DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Monday Volume 512 28 June 2010 No. 22 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 28 June 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 545 28 JUNE 2010 546 Mrs May: The hon. Gentleman has been a long-standing House of Commons campaigner on the issue of drugs. As it happens, he and I take a different view on how we should approach the issue. What we need to be doing in this country is Monday 28 June 2010 looking at making abstinence much more of a goal for individuals and looking seriously at ensuring that the The House met at half-past Two o’clock treatment and rehabilitation provided to drug addicts mean that they do not simply go back on drugs in future. PRAYERS Defendant Anonymity (Rape Trials) [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] 2. Kerry McCarthy (Bristol East) (Lab): What discussions she has had with the Secretary of State for Justice on the effects on police investigations of plans to give anonymity to defendants in rape trials; and if Oral Answers to Questions she will make a statement. [4220] The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department (Lynne Featherstone): My right hon. HOME DEPARTMENT Friend the Home Secretary has had a number of discussions on this issue with her cabinet colleague the Secretary of The Secretary of State was asked— State for Justice. We have made it clear that we will progress our commitment on this subject with the care Drugs that it merits. Our consideration of the options will of course include a full examination of any impact on 1. Sarah Newton (Truro and Falmouth) (Con): What police investigations. recent assessment she has made of the level of problem drug use in this country compared to other EU Kerry McCarthy: The Minister will know that this member states. [4219] issue has been brought up time and again in the Chamber. The Secretary of State for the Home Department We have had a confusing and mixed set of responses (Mrs Theresa May): The most recent estimate of problem from the various Ministers who have answered. Could drug users for England is 328,767 for 2006-07. Estimates she now confirm whether it is the Government’s intention for 2008-09 will be available in October. The European to bring forward legislation to give anonymity to rape Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction estimates defendants, and if so, what is the timetable for that, and show the UK with the highest rate, although there is no on what basis have they made that decision? consistent methodology for calculating estimates across different countries, which prevents direct comparisons. Lynne Featherstone: There have been a number of Nevertheless, that level of problem drug use is unacceptable. discussions, as I just said, and the Prime Minister The Government are committed to tackling it and himself has said that the issue will be brought forward rebalancing the treatment system so that abstinence is for debate in this Chamber at an appropriate point. the clear goal. Alan Johnson (Kingston upon Hull West and Hessle) Sarah Newton: I thank my right hon. Friend for her (Lab): I would be interested at some stage to learn the answer, but does she agree that one of the biggest Home Secretary’s views on the issue, because it is a problems at the moment is the availability of so-called crucial one both for the Home Department and for legal highs? Does she agree that the previous Government equalities. The Lord Chancellor told the House the were slow to address the issue, and can she assure the other day that he had voted for anonymity in 2003. I House—and especially the families in my constituency voted against it, and that is still my view, but at some who have young people going off to university for the stage I would like to know the Home Secretary’s view. first time this autumn—that she will take action to As for the Minister, she will know that the Prime Minister protect people from such substances? recently told the House when he replied to a question on the issue that Baroness Stern had Mrs May: I thank my hon. Friend for that question. She has made an extremely valid point on an issue that “found that 8 to 10% of reported rape cases could result in false will concern a large number of parents and others. She allegations.”—[Official Report, 9 June 2010; Vol. 511, c. 329.] is right to say that the previous Government were slow The Minister should know that the Stern report made to deal with the issue of legal highs, particularly no such finding and that what Baroness Stern recommended mephedrone. It was only pushing from our party while was independent research to study the frequency of in opposition that led them to do something about it, false allegations of rape compared with other offences. and we are committed to introducing a temporary ban Does the Minister agree that the Government ought to on legal highs. be implementing that recommendation, instead of proposing to introduce anonymity? Paul Flynn (Newport West) (Lab): The United Kingdom has the harshest drug laws in Europe and the highest Lynne Featherstone: In the first instance, I am sure number of addicts. Portugal has the least harsh policies that the Home Secretary and the Secretary of State for in all of Europe and the smallest number of addicts. Justice will indeed look at what sort of research is Why is this? necessary, prior to bringing any debate to the House. 547 Oral Answers28 JUNE 2010 Oral Answers 548 Fiona Mactaggart (Slough) (Lab): I was slightly taken Lynne Featherstone: The British crime survey is a aback by the hon. Lady’s “Oh, we’re going to look at good source of information, but I will refer this matter the research before we do this”, given that, up until now, back and the Minister will write. it seems there has been a failure to talk to those tasked with implementing the policy. Has she or any of her Detention (Terrorist Suspects) colleagues spoken to the Association of Chief Police Officers lead on rape about the policy, and what has his 4. Bob Blackman (Harrow East) (Con): Whether she response been? plans to renew the legislation which permits terrorist suspects to be detained for 28 days without charge. Lynne Featherstone: I have not spoken to the ACPO [4222] lead on the issue, but I will refer that question to the Secretary of State for Justice, who may well have 6. Mr David Davis (Haltemprice and Howden) (Con): done so. Whether she plans to renew the legislation which permits terrorist suspects to be detained for 28 days Domestic Violence without charge. [4224] 3. Mr Chuka Umunna (Streatham) (Lab): How she The Secretary of State for the Home Department plans to take forward the conclusions of the work of (Mrs Theresa May): The Government laid an order last the “Together we can end violence against women and Thursday to renew the existing 28-day maximum period for pre-charge detention for terrorist suspects for six girls” strategy consultation on domestic violence. [4221] months, while we conduct a review of counter-terrorism measures and programmes, including pre-charge detention. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Both coalition parties are clear that the 28-day period Home Department (Lynne Featherstone): Violence against should be a temporary measure, and one that we shall women and girls ruins lives and destroys families, and be looking to reduce over time. its impact is felt down the generations. A cross-government strategy is the best way to address domestic violence Bob Blackman: I thank the Home Secretary for her and other forms of violence against women. In July, the answer. We are, of course, all committed to safeguarding Home Secretary will chair a meeting of Ministers across Britain against terrorist activities. How many people government that will be dedicated to this issue, and we have been detained for 28 days under these powers in look forward to discussing how we will take forward the past three years? our approach in this area. Mrs May: I am sure that my hon. Friend has followed Mr Umunna: I am a supporter of the Cassandra the old adage about not asking a question to which one learning centre, which is an organisation in my community does not know the answer. The answer is that, since that works on these issues. It was set up by the family of 2007, no one has been detained for 28 days. Before that a victim whose killer was one of the first to be retried date, a number of people were detained for periods of and sentenced following the revision of the rules on between 14 and 28 days. As I made clear in my opening double jeopardy. What funding do the Government answer, we see the 28-day period as a temporary measure, intend to make available to such third sector organisations and we are committed to reducing it over time. working in this field and, importantly, will that funding be ring-fenced, given last week’s Budget? Mr Davis: I, too, thank my right hon. Friend for her answer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interpreting Parliamentary Scrutiny
    Interpreting Parliamentary Scrutiny An enquiry concerning everyday practices of parliamentary actors in select committees of the House of Commons Marc Geddes A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Politics Faculty of Social Sciences The University of Sheffield May 2016 Contents Abstract v Acknowledgements vi List of tables and figures viii Introduction 1 Part I: Theoretical Foundations Chapter 1: Traditions 9 Chapter 2: Theory 35 Chapter 3: Methodology 58 Part II: Interpreting Scrutiny Chapter 4: Members 81 Chapter 5: Chairs 111 Chapter 6: Staff 137 Part III: Scrutiny Landscapes Chapter 7: Relationships 165 Chapter 8: Evidence 194 Chapter 9: Conclusions 223 iii Notes Appendix A: List of select committees 245 Appendix B: Ethics agreement 247 Appendix C: House of Commons confidentiality agreement 249 Appendix D: Standard interview consent form 251 Appendix E: Interview themes and checklist 253 Appendix F: Summary statistics for committee members 255 Appendix G: Summary data for witnesses 257 Appendix H: Summary of witness database categories 259 Bibliography 261 iv Abstract This doctorate looks at the role of parliamentary select committees in the UK House of Commons. Though the literature on this topic is extensive, this research project explores the issue from a distinctive vantage point. While research on committees has predominantly focused on their outputs, such as committee reports, in order to assess the effectiveness of Parliament in holding the executive to account, this thesis looks at the input-side to committee work. It explores the individual beliefs, everyday practices and perennial dilemmas of parliamentary actors in select committees. In doing so, this thesis argues that understanding beliefs and practices of committee members, chairs and staff are crucial ways to better comprehend the way that scrutiny works in the House of Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the 91St Session of the United Nations Human Rights Committee
    Submission to the 91st Session of the United Nations Human Rights Committee on Respect for Freedom of Expression in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland London October 2007 ARTICLE 19 à 6-8 Amwell Street à London EC1R 1UQ à United Kingdom Tel +44 20 7278 9292 à Fax +44 20 7278 7660 à [email protected] à http://www.article19.org 1. Introduction This submission outlines ARTICLE 19’s main concerns regarding respect for the right to freedom of expression in the United Kingdom. Our submissions is presented in respect of the consideration by the United Nations Human Rights Committee of the Sixth Periodic Report of the United Kingdom on the implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). A list of possible questions to be posed to the United Kingdom representation is appended to this submission. ARTICLE 19 is an international, non-governmental human rights organisation which works around the world to protect and promote the right to freedom of expression and information. 2. Summary of concerns The United Kingdom is a long-standing member of the Council of Europe and European Union and a party to the European Convention of Human Rights as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. While the right to freedom of expression is generally respected, there are currently problems in five key areas: Access to information: i) The Freedom of Information Act 2000 contains exemptions which allow access to information to be refused on arbitrary or inappropriate grounds. ii) The government has proposed FOIA amendments to the way the costs of processing a request under the Act are assessed, making it easier to reject politically sensitive or complex requests on the grounds of costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of the Right to Protest at Parliament
    Law, Crime and History (2013) 1 LETTING DOWN THE DRAWBRIDGE: RESTORATION OF THE RIGHT TO PROTEST AT PARLIAMENT Kiron Reid1 Abstract This article analyses the history of the prohibition of protests around Parliament under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005. This prohibited any demonstrations of one or more persons within one square kilometre of the Houses of Parliament unless permission had been obtained in writing from the police in advance. This measure both formed part of a pattern of the then Labour Government to restrict protest and increase police powers, and was symbolically important in restricting protest that was directed at politicians at a time when politicians have been very unpopular. The Government of Tony Blair had been embarrassed by a one-man protest by peace campaigner, Brian Haw. In response to sustained defiance, Mr. Blair’s successor as Labour Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, and opposition Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs pledged to remove the restrictions, but this was not acted on by Parliament until September 2011. This article argues that the original restrictions were unnecessary, and that the much narrower successor provisions could be improved by being drafted more specifically. Keywords: protest, demonstration, protest at Parliament, freedom of speech, Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, Brian Haw. Introduction This is about the sorry tale of sections 132-138 Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (SOCPA).2 These prohibited any demonstrations of one or more persons within one square kilometre of the Houses of Parliament unless advance written permission had been obtained from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis.
    [Show full text]
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely
    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 587 10 November 2014 No. 59 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 10 November 2014 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2014 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1161 10 NOVEMBER 2014 1162 delayed? An answer was expected in December, but it House of Commons has been delayed to January and then to the end of January. Will he tell us when he will make a decision? Monday 10 November 2014 Mr Pickles: As the hon. Gentleman knows, we do not call in many applications for consideration. Last year, The House met at half-past Two o’clock we called in only about eight. The one he has mentioned has some degree of complexity, and he will understand PRAYERS that I cannot comment about the individual application until all the facts are before me. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr Mark Prisk (Hertford and Stortford) (Con): I strongly support the Minister’s excellent work in devolving Mr Speaker: I remind the House that tomorrow, powers to our city regions. Will he assure us that our Tuesday 11 November, is Armistice day. At 11 o’clock counties and rural areas such as those in east Hertfordshire tomorrow, I regard it as appropriate that we, and staff will have the same opportunity for these new responsibilities? working for us, should join the nation in observing the two-minute silence so that we might remember those Mr Pickles: Such areas most certainly do have the who gave their lives for their country to help preserve same opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Leeds Century House
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT Region: Yorkshire & Humber Location Century House, Pudsey, Leeds, LS28 7RQ. To withdraw from Century House and relocate staff to other Original Proposal HMRC offices within Reasonable Daily Travel. The intention is to withdraw from Century House, relocating Decision staff to 1 Munroe Court, Leeds by spring 2009. Travel times for some staff may exceed or be at the limit of Risks/Issues Reasonable Daily Travel if relocating to 1 Munroe Court, Leeds. Further examination of individual circumstances will be undertaken through one to one discussions between Mitigating Action managers and staff. No staff will be required to relocate beyond Reasonable Daily Travel. Issued by Workforce Change 17 October 2007 Impact Assessment: Century House, Pudsey, Leeds IMPACT ASSESSMENT Contents 1 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Background ........................................................................................... 3 1.2. Enquiry Centre Customers.................................................................... 3 1.3. Socio-Economic .................................................................................... 3 1.4. Staff....................................................................................................... 3 1.5. Staff Diversity ........................................................................................ 3 1.6. Business Units .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Human Rights Approach to Policing Protest
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights Demonstrating respect for rights? A human rights approach to policing protest Seventh Report of Session 2008–09 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 3 March 2009 Ordered by the House of Lords to be printed 3 March 2009 HL Paper 47-I HC 320-I Published on 23 March 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Joint Committee on Human Rights The Joint Committee on Human Rights is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom (but excluding consideration of individual cases); proposals for remedial orders, draft remedial orders and remedial orders. The Joint Committee has a maximum of six Members appointed by each House, of whom the quorum for any formal proceedings is two from each House. Current membership HOUSE OF LORDS HOUSE OF COMMONS Lord Bowness John Austin MP (Labour, Erith & Thamesmead) Lord Dubs Mr Andrew Dismore MP (Labour, Hendon) (Chairman) Lord Lester of Herne Hill Dr Evan Harris MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Lord Morris of Handsworth OJ Abingdon) The Earl of Onslow Mr Virendra Sharma MP (Labour, Ealing, Southall) Baroness Prashar Mr Richard Shepherd MP (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Mr Edward Timpson MP (Conservative, Crewe & Nantwitch) Powers The Committee has the power to require the submission of written evidence and documents, to examine witnesses, to meet at any time (except when Parliament is prorogued or dissolved), to adjourn from place to place, to appoint specialist advisers, and to make Reports to both Houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Msps Mps and Meps: Session 4 11 May 2012 Msps: Current Series
    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament I nfor mation C entre l ogo Scottish Parliament Fact sheet MSPs MPs and MEPs: Session 4 11 May 2012 MSPs: Current Series This Fact Sheet provides a list of current Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs), Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represent. Abbreviations used: Scottish Parliament and European Parliament Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Ind Independent Lab Scottish Labour Party LD Scottish Liberal Democrats NPA No Party Affiliation SNP Scottish National Party UK Parliament Con Conservative and Unionist Party Co-op Co-operative Party Lab Labour Party LD Liberal Democrats NPA No Party Affiliation SNP Scottish National Party Scottish Parliament and Westminster constituencies do not cover the same areas, although the names of the constituencies may be the same or similar. At the May 2005 general election, the number of Westminster constituencies was reduced from 72 to 59, which led to changes in constituency boundaries. Details of these changes can be found on the Boundary Commission’s website at www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/westminster Scottish Parliament Constituencies Constituency MSP Party Aberdeen Central Kevin Stewart SNP Aberdeen Donside Brian Adam SNP Aberdeen South and North Maureen Watt SNP Kincardine Aberdeenshire East Alex Salmond SNP Aberdeenshire West Dennis Robertson SNP Airdrie and Shotts Alex Neil SNP Almond Valley Angela
    [Show full text]
  • Download the List of Councillors Ward by Ward
    The Thoresby Society The Leeds Historical Society founded in 1889 Leeds City Councillors 1980-2021 Ward by Ward with an alphabetical index of names This document lists for each Ward its Councillors from 1980 onwards. The lists of Councillors are ordered first by the date of their first election, then by their length of service, and then alphabetically. There are Leeds City Council elections in three years out of four, with no elections in 1981, 1985, 1989 and so on, except that because of the Covid pandemic, there were no elections in2020, but elections in 2021. The elections in 1980, 2004 and 2018 were contested on new ward boundaries, with three seats up for election in each ward. In other years only one seat was up for election in each ward, except in a few cases when there was also a casual vacancy to be filled. Sometimes when the boundaries of a ward were changed, its name also changed. The years from 1980 in which a ward of a given name existed are given after the name. Current wards are listed first, followed by former wards. The lists of Councillors by ward are followed by an alphabetical index of all the Councillors elected in the given period. Leaders of the Council 1980-1989 George Mudie (Labour) 1989-1996 Jon Trickett (Labour) 1996-2003 Brian Walker (Labour) 2003-2004 Keith Wakefield (Labour) 2004-2007 Mark Harris (Liberal Democrat) [Joint Leader] 2004-2010 Andrew Carter (Conservative) [Joint Leader] 2007-2010 Richard Brett (Liberal Democrat) [Joint Leader] 2010-2015 Keith Wakefield (Labour) 2015-2021 Judith Blake (Labour) 2021- James Lewis (Labout) It is too much to be hoped that this document contains no errors.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces And
    The New Spatial Planning Providing a critical examination of how devolution has influenced the ways that practices of planning have evolved, this book looks at how planning has sought to become more strategic, more spatial and better integrated with other policy sectors. It challenges traditional views of what planning is about and how best to study it. The book highlights the new spaces of planning – the devolved nations of the UK and a variety of new sub-national spaces. Arguing that the reality of spatial planning is that it is producing better quality paper plans whilst still delivering poor quality physical development on the ground, this book takes a provocative tone questioning whether spatial planning is having the kinds of impacts its advocates would wish. Original research undertaken across Ireland and the devolved nations and regions of the UK is the base of the book, which emphasises the divergence of planning practices that devolution has allowed to unfold. Separate chapters present cases of spatial planning experience in Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, and two English regions – the Thames Gateway and the Leeds City Region. New insights into spatial planning, regeneration and territorial politics are clearly presented here, resulting in an invaluable source book on the first decade or so of planning experience post-devolution for researchers and students interested in urban and regional studies, geography and planning. Graham Haughton is Professor of Human Geography at the University of Hull. His research is in the areas of spatial planning, sustainable urban development, local and regional economic development, and urban and regional regeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • 26/03/2015 Luciana Berger Written Question in Vitro Fertilisation 26/03
    Date Member(s) Type Topic (click for transcript) 26/03/2015 Luciana Berger Written Question In Vitro Fertilisation 26/03/2015 Fiona Bruce Written Question Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome 25/03/2015 Jim Dowd Written Question Domestic Violence 25/03/2015 Jim Shannon Written Question Contraceptives: Inflammatory Bowel Disease 25/03/2015 Andrew Smith Written Question Democratic Republic of Congo 25/03/2015 Nicholas Brown Written Question International Assistance 24/03/2015 Richard Fuller Written Question Immigrants: Pregnant Women 24/03/2015 Andrew Smith Written Question Rape: Democratic Republic of Congo 23/03/2015 Jamie Reed Written Question Midwives 23/03/2015 Fiona Bruce Written Question Abortion 20/03/2015 Fiona Bruce Written Question Contraceptives: Young People 20/03/2015 Fiona Bruce Written Question Contraceptives 18/03/2015 Mark Pawsey, Ann Clwyd, Malcolm Bruce, Valerie Vaz, Mary Oral Questions Female Genital Mutilation / Early Forced Marriage Macleod 18/03/2015 Graeme Morrice Early Day Motion Hormone Pregnancy Test Drugs 18/03/2015 Seema Malhotra Written Question Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence 18/03/2015 Mike Freer Written Question Human Papillomavirus: Vaccination 17/03/2015 Frank Field, Emily Thornberry, Henry Smith, Fiona Mactaggart, Legislation Modern Slavery Bill [Consideration of Lords Amendments] David Burrowes, David Hanson, Michael Connarty, Mark Durkan, Caroline Spelman, Chloe Smith, Andrew Stunell, Caroline Nokes, Heather Wheeler, Paul Blomfield,
    [Show full text]