Seed Value Chain Mapping and Analysis of Finger Millet in Debub Achefer Wereda, Ethiopia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seed Value Chain Mapping and Analysis of Finger Millet in Debub Achefer Wereda, Ethiopia DSpace Institution DSpace Repository http://dspace.org Agricultural Economics Thesis and Dissertations 2019-10-04 SEED VALUE CHAIN MAPPING AND ANALYSIS OF FINGER MILLET IN DEBUB ACHEFER WEREDA, ETHIOPIA Nigus, Tadesse http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9793 Downloaded from DSpace Repository, DSpace Institution's institutional repository BAHIR DAR UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM SEED VALUE CHAIN MAPPING AND ANALYSIS OF FINGER MILLET IN DEBUB ACHEFER WEREDA, ETHIOPIA MSc Thesis By Nigus Tadesse November 2018 Bahir Dar BAHIR DAR UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF AGRICUTLURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES GRADUATE PROGRAM SEED VALUE CHAIN MAPPING AND ANALYSIS OF FINGER MILLET IN DEBUB ACHEFER WEREDA, ETHIOPIA MSc Thesis By Nigus Tadesse Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (MSc.) in “Agricultural Economics” November 2018 Bahir Dar ii THESIS APPROVAL SHEET As member of the Board of Examiners of the Master of Sciences (M.Sc.) thesis open defense examination, we have read and evaluated this thesis prepared by Mr Nigus Tadesse Ferede entitled Seed Value Chain Mapping and Analysis of Finger Millet in Debub Achefer Wereda, Ethiopia. We hereby certify that, the thesis is accepted for fulfilling the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Sciences (M.Sc.) in Agricultural Economics. Board of Examiners ______________ ________________ _______________ Name of External Examiner Signature Date ______________ ________________ _______________ Name of Internal Examiner Signature Date ______________ ________________ _______________ Name of Chairman Examiner Signature Date iii DECLARATION This is to certify that this thesis entitled “SEED VALUE CHAIN MAPPING AND ANALYSIS OF FINGER MILLET IN DEBUB ACHEFER WEREDA, ETHIOPIA” submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science in “Agricultural Economics” to the Graduate Program of College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University by Mr. Nigus Tadesse (ID. No. BDU0906146 PR) is an authentic work carried out by him under our guidance. The matter embodied in this project work has not been submitted earlier for award of any degree or diploma to the best of our knowledge and belief. Name of the Student _______________________ Signature & date _____________________ Name of the Supervisors 1) _________________________ (Major Supervisor) Signature & date_____________________ 2) __________________________ (Co-Supervisor) Signature & date_____________________ iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Always, I am in the hands of God!!! God is everything for me. That is why God is the secret of my success. Always thanks to Almighty God!!! It is not possible to thank by referring names of all people and institutions that contribute for the accomplishment of this research work, but I want to deserve special mention. First I would like to thank my major advisor Dr. Zemen Ayalew for his priceless advice, insight and guidance to the completion of the research work. I similarly thank my co-advisor Dr. Derejie Ayalew in assistance and guidance starting from the inception of the research idea up to the completion of the thesis. I am highly indebted to both of you! I would like to appreciate and recognize the fruitful program of Integrated Seed Sector Development/ISSD Ethiopia. Since ISSD Ethiopia plays an inevitable role for the successful accomplishment of this research through granting me the research fund. My sincere gratitude and indebtedness is also extended to Dr. Amsalu Ayana (ISSD National Program Management Unit) for accepting my concept note and granting me the research fund on behalf of ISSD Ethiopia Program. I am highly indebted to ISSD Amhara Regional program Manager Mr. Ahimed and Finance Officer Mr. Getu for their cooperative assistance, for their facilitation to all logistics and timely response for all my requests. In addition, I would like to express my sincere appreciation and gratitude to Wereda and kebele level agricultural and rural development, trade and development administrative offices of the study area. I want also to take this opportunity to thank Ato Nigatu Desta for his motive advises. Last but not least my heartfelt thanks go to my dearest family for unlimited help and encouragement to see my success. v DEDICATION This Thesis manuscript is dedicated to my mother Wedie Abesha and my father Tadesse Ferede. Their contribution is an Engine for the success of my academic carrier and my life. vi ABBREVIATION ADLI Agricultural Development Led Industrialization APE Average Partial Effect BDS Business Development Service BoARD Beauro of Agriculture and Rural Development CSA Central Statistical Agency CBSS Community Based Seed System ESE Ethiopian Seed Enterprise FAO Food and Agricultural Organization GDP Gross Domestic Product GTZ Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit ILO International Labor Organization IMR Invers Mills Ratio LSBs Local Seed Businesses MoARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development NARS National Agriculture Research System RSE Regional Seed Enterprise SNNP South Nation, Nationalities and Peoples SNV Stichting Nederland Vrijwilligers SWOT Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat TLU Tropical Livestock Unit UNIDO United Nation International Development Organization vii ABSTRACT This thesis is focused on seed value chain mapping and analysis of finger millet in Debub Achefer Wereda of Ethiopia. The objectives of the study were to develop value chain map of the finger millet seed, identify determinants of household participation decision and level of participation in finger millet seed marketing and examine the performance of finger millet seed value chain. The study used both primary and secondary data. A total of 194 respondents that is 26 from traders and 168 from household farmers were interviewed using different structured survey questionnaires. Focus group discussion and key informant interviews were used. Unlike to marketing systems of finger millet grain, seed market is informal and has no licensed middlemen actors. Seed value chain map was developed and based on the map over 80% of marketed finger millet seed product is directly flow from producers to farmers and the producers have more power for making initial price. Both in finger millet grain and seed, farmers took the highest profit margins which are 375.5 ETB/qt and 669.05 ETB/qt respectively. Double hurdle model was employed to identify factors that determine market participation decision and intensity of participation in finger millet seed market. The model result showed that market distance have negative and literate household head and extension contacts have positive significant effect for participation decision and total finger millet output has positive significant effect for intensity of participation. The SWOT analysis result showed lack of trend for allocating land alone for seed production, trend of using grains for seed, absence of seed business association, absence of full extension package, expensiveness of the crop’s threshing activity in terms of time, cattle power and labor consumption and expansion of eucalyptus trees were the observed weaknesses and threats of the value chain. Establishing local seed businesses, developing full finger millet extension package, formalizing the seed market system, providing technical support for small land holders and introducing a finger millet variety having high grain and straw yield, high market demand and inexpensive threshing activity in terms of labor, time and cattle power are recommended for finger millet grain and seed value chain development. Key words: finger millet, seed, grain, value chain analysis, SWOT analysis, double hurdle. viii TABLE OF CONTENT Contents Page THESIS APPROVAL SHEET ----------------------------------------------------------------- iii DECLARATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- v DEDICATION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vi ABBREVIATION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vii ABSTRACT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- viii LIST OF TABLES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- xii LIST OF FIGURES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xiii LIST OF APPENDECS TABLES ----------------------------------------------------------- xiv Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Justification ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Statement of the Problem ............................................................................................ 3 1.3 Research Objective ...................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Research Question ....................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Scope and Limitations of the Study ............................................................................ 5 1.6 Significance of the Study ............................................................................................ 6 1.7 Organization of the
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study for a Lake Tana Biosphere Reserve, Ethiopia
    Friedrich zur Heide Feasibility Study for a Lake Tana Biosphere Reserve, Ethiopia BfN-Skripten 317 2012 Feasibility Study for a Lake Tana Biosphere Reserve, Ethiopia Friedrich zur Heide Cover pictures: Tributary of the Blue Nile River near the Nile falls (top left); fisher in his traditional Papyrus boat (Tanqua) at the southwestern papyrus belt of Lake Tana (top centre); flooded shores of Deq Island (top right); wild coffee on Zege Peninsula (bottom left); field with Guizotia scabra in the Chimba wetland (bottom centre) and Nymphaea nouchali var. caerulea (bottom right) (F. zur Heide). Author’s address: Friedrich zur Heide Michael Succow Foundation Ellernholzstrasse 1/3 D-17489 Greifswald, Germany Phone: +49 3834 83 542-15 Fax: +49 3834 83 542-22 Email: [email protected] Co-authors/support: Dr. Lutz Fähser Michael Succow Foundation Renée Moreaux Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald Christian Sefrin Department of Geography, University of Bonn Maxi Springsguth Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald Fanny Mundt Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald Scientific Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Michael Succow Michael Succow Foundation Email: [email protected] Technical Supervisor at BfN: Florian Carius Division I 2.3 “International Nature Conservation” Email: [email protected] The study was conducted by the Michael Succow Foundation (MSF) in cooperation with the Amhara National Regional State Bureau of Culture, Tourism and Parks Development (BoCTPD) and supported by the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) with funds from the Environmental Research Plan (FKZ: 3510 82 3900) of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU).
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Khat Production on Household Welfare in Amhara Region of Ethiopia
    Impact of khat production on household welfare in Amhara region of Ethiopia by Hanna Lynn Ruder B.S., Kansas State University, 2016 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Agricultural Economics College of Agriculture KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2018 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Benjamin Schwab Copyright © Hanna Ruder 2018. Abstract Khat, a lucrative cash crop cultivated in and near the Horn of Africa, is gaining the interest of researchers around the globe. Despite its potential to provide excess income, economic opportunity, and access to technology to those who produce it, the conflicting legal status around the globe causes policy and trade disputes between countries. Research on the impact of khat production on household welfare is sparse. To address this, the purpose of this research is to determine what factors affect the decision to grow khat and subsequently determine the impact of khat production on labor, income, education expenditure, and food security. Data was extracted from a survey conducted in early 2017. A total of 365 households in the Amhara Region of Ethiopia were surveyed. We estimate the factors affecting the decision to grow khat by employing use of two logit models and one linear probability model to calculate marginal effects. We estimate the impact of khat production on labor, income, education expenditure, and food security through propensity score matching. Khat production appears to be adopted by households who are educated and apt to adopt improved technologies. These households are likely to own a donkey, own irrigation, and own more plots than a non-producing household.
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Opinion 2017;9(7) 60
    Report and Opinion 2017;9(7) http://www.sciencepub.net/report Community Based Knowledge, Attitude And Practice Of Rabies In Injibara Town And Its Surroundings, Awi Zone, Amhara Regional State, North-Western Ethiopia Yigardush Wassihune1, Melese Yenew1, Ayalew Niguse2 1 College of Veterinary Medicine, Jigjiga University, P.O. Box.1020, Jigjiga, Ethiopia. 2Lecturer at Jigjiga university, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jigjiga University, P.O. Box.1020, Jigjiga, Ethiopia. [email protected] Abstract: Rabies is a viral disease of all warm blooded animals, which causes acute fatal encephalitis, with almost 100% case fatality rate. It is caused by rabies virus (genus Lyssa virus) which is mainly transmitted by rabid animal bites. This disease occurs in more than 150 countries and territories and about 55,000 people die of rabies every year, mostly in developing world despite that it is preventable disease by vaccination. Ethiopia is highly endemic for rabies; yet, a nationwide data on rabies has not been gathered to reveal the actual magnitude of the problem and public awareness levels. With a conviction that a handful of works on public knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) in rabies be done to plan, execute any control and/or eradication programs, this study was conducted in Injibara town and its surroundings from November, 2015 to April, 2016 to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) on rabies and related factors. The design was: ccommunity-based retrospective, quantitative study design to assess the KAP on rabies and related factors. The entire three kebeles of the town and its surrounding rural kebeles were considered in the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Dairy Value Chain in West Amhara (Bahir Dar Zuria and Fogera Woreda Case)
    Dairy Value Chain in West Amhara (Bahir Dar Zuria and Fogera Woreda case) Paulos Desalegn Commissioned by Programme for Agro-Business Induced Growth in the Amhara National Regional State August, 2018 Bahir Dar, Ethiopia 0 | Page List of Abbreviations and Acronyms AACCSA - Addis Ababa Chamber of Commerce and Sectorial Association AGP - Agriculture Growth Program AgroBIG – Agro-Business Induced Growth program AI - Artificial Insemination BZW - Bahir Dar Zuria Woreda CAADP - Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program CIF - Cost, Insurance and Freight CSA - Central Statistics Agency ETB - Ethiopian Birr EU - European Union FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FEED - Feed Enhancement for Ethiopian Development FGD - Focal Group Discussion FSP - Food Security Program FTC - Farmers Training Center GTP II - Second Growth and Transformation Plan KI - Key Informants KM (km) - Kilo Meter LIVES - Livestock and Irrigation Value chains for Ethiopian Smallholders LMD - Livestock Market Development LMP - Livestock Master Plan Ltr (ltr) - Liter PIF - Policy and Investment Framework USD - United States Dollar 1 | Page Table of Contents List of Abbreviations and Acronyms .................................................................................... 1 Executive summary ....................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables ............................................................................................................... 4 List of Figures
    [Show full text]
  • AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (As of 13 February 2013)
    AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (as of 13 February 2013) Tigray Tigray Interventions/Projects at Woreda Level Afar Amhara ERCS: Lay Gayint: Beneshangul Gumu / Dire Dawa Plan Int.: Addis Ababa Hareri Save the fk Save the Save the df d/k/ CARE:f k Save the Children:f Gambela Save the Oromia Children: Children:f Children: Somali FHI: Welthungerhilfe: SNNPR j j Children:l lf/k / Oxfam GB:af ACF: ACF: Save the Save the af/k af/k Save the df Save the Save the Tach Gayint: Children:f Children: Children:fj Children:l Children: l FHI:l/k MSF Holand:f/ ! kj CARE: k Save the Children:f ! FHI:lf/k Oxfam GB: a Tselemt Save the Childrenf: j Addi Dessie Zuria: WVE: Arekay dlfk Tsegede ! Beyeda Concern:î l/ Mirab ! Concern:/ Welthungerhilfe:k Save the Children: Armacho f/k Debark Save the Children:fj Kelela: Welthungerhilfe: ! / Tach Abergele CRS: ak Save the Children:fj ! Armacho ! FHI: Save the l/k Save thef Dabat Janamora Legambo: Children:dfkj Children: ! Plan Int.:d/ j WVE: Concern: GOAL: Save the Children: dlfk Sahla k/ a / f ! ! Save the ! Lay Metema North Ziquala Children:fkj Armacho Wegera ACF: Save the Children: Tenta: ! k f Gonder ! Wag WVE: Plan Int.: / Concern: Save the dlfk Himra d k/ a WVE: ! Children: f Sekota GOAL: dlf Save the Children: Concern: Save the / ! Save: f/k Chilga ! a/ j East Children:f West ! Belesa FHI:l Save the Children:/ /k ! Gonder Belesa Dehana ! CRS: Welthungerhilfe:/ Dembia Zuria ! î Save thedf Gaz GOAL: Children: Quara ! / j CARE: WVE: Gibla ! l ! Save the Children: Welthungerhilfe: k d k/ Takusa dlfj k
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Users at the Different Levels of Wash Projects
    Briefing note – No. 6 The Role of Users at the Different Levels of WaSH Projects Learning and Communications in WASH in Amhara Introductio n recommendations for increasing community management of WaSH in the Amhara Region. The In Africa and other developing countries, sustainability of rural water supply is quite low with 30 to 60% of the main research document will soon be available at schemes becoming non-functional at some point after www.wateraidethiopia.org and www.bdu.edu.et. implementation (Brikké and Bredero, 2003). The lack of community participation especially in management has been recognized as one of the reasons for the low Background sustainability (Carter.1999). For example, limited Harvey and Reed (2006) explain that “community involvement of the community at all stages of water participation does not automatically lead to effective development, the lack of a modest water service fee community management, nor should it have to. and a shortage of adequate skill and capacity to Community participation is a prerequisite for maintain water resources are specific aspects of sustainability, i.e. to achieve efficiency, effectiveness, community participation that have decreased equity, and replicablity, but community management is sustainability of rural water supply in the Amhara not. The community management in rural Ethiopia is Region of Ethiopia (Mengesha et al, 2003). based on the formation of water user committees All water supply providers in Ethiopia are currently usually at each water point in order to follow up the following the principle of community participation and implementation process, to manage the WaSH scheme community management in the rural area.
    [Show full text]
  • Broad Bed Maker Technology Package Innovations in Ethiopian Farming Systems: an Ex Post Impact Assessment
    ILRI International Livestock Research Institute Research Report 20 Broad bed maker technology package innovations in Ethiopian farming systems: An ex post impact assessment ISBN 92–9146–226–8 Broad bed maker technology package innovations in Ethiopian farming systems: An ex post impact assessment Arlene S Rutherford (PhD) ILRI International Livestock Research Institute INTERNATIONAL LIVESTOCK RESEARCH INSTITUTE i Author’s affiliation Arlene S Rutherford (PhD), Consultant to ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya © 2008 ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute). All rights reserved. Parts of this publication may be reproduced for non-commercial use provided that such reproduction shall be subject to acknowledgement of ILRI as holder of copyright. Editing, design and layout—ILRI Publication Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ISBN 92–9146–226–8 Correct citation: Rutherford AS. 2008. Broad bed maker technology package innovations in Ethiopian farming systems: An ex post impact assessment. Research Report 20. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya. 89 pp. ii Table of Contents List of Tables iv Acknowledgements v Executive summary vi 1 Introduction 1 2 Methodology 4 3 Results and discussion 6 3.1 National and regional impacts 6 3.2 The policy environment 9 3.3 Farmer survey results 16 3.4 Crop yields and prices with and without the BBM TP: Gross margins (GM) 27 3.5 Welfare with and without the BBM TP: Economic surplus (ES) 28 4 Conclusions and recommendations 31 References 32 Annex 1 Drawings
    [Show full text]
  • English-Full (0.5
    Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Building Climate Resilient Green Economy in Ethiopia Strategy for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations Wubalem Tadesse Alemu Gezahegne Teshome Tesema Bitew Shibabaw Berihun Tefera Habtemariam Kassa Center for International Forestry Research Ethiopia Office Addis Ababa October 2015 Copyright © Center for International Forestry Research, 2015 Cover photo by authors FOREWORD This regional strategy document for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State, with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations, was produced as one of the outputs of a project entitled “Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Ethiopia’s Climate Resilient Green Economy”, and implemented between September 2013 and August 2015. CIFOR and our ministry actively collaborated in the planning and implementation of the project, which involved over 25 senior experts drawn from Federal ministries, regional bureaus, Federal and regional research institutes, and from Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources and other universities. The senior experts were organised into five teams, which set out to identify effective forest management practices, and enabling conditions for scaling them up, with the aim of significantly enhancing the role of forests in building a climate resilient green economy in Ethiopia. The five forest management practices studied were: the establishment and management of area exclosures; the management of plantation forests; Participatory Forest Management (PFM); agroforestry (AF); and the management of dry forests and woodlands. Each team focused on only one of the five forest management practices, and concentrated its study in one regional state.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Amhara Region Administrative Map (As of 05 Jan 2015)
    Ethiopia: Amhara region administrative map (as of 05 Jan 2015) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abrha jara ! Tselemt !Adi Arikay Town ! Addi Arekay ! Zarima Town !Kerakr ! ! T!IGRAY Tsegede ! ! Mirab Armacho Beyeda ! Debark ! Debarq Town ! Dil Yibza Town ! ! Weken Town Abergele Tach Armacho ! Sanja Town Mekane Berhan Town ! Dabat DabatTown ! Metema Town ! Janamora ! Masero Denb Town ! Sahla ! Kokit Town Gedebge Town SUDAN ! ! Wegera ! Genda Wuha Town Ziquala ! Amba Giorges Town Tsitsika Town ! ! ! ! Metema Lay ArmachoTikil Dingay Town ! Wag Himra North Gonder ! Sekota Sekota ! Shinfa Tomn Negade Bahr ! ! Gondar Chilga Aukel Ketema ! ! Ayimba Town East Belesa Seraba ! Hamusit ! ! West Belesa ! ! ARIBAYA TOWN Gonder Zuria ! Koladiba Town AMED WERK TOWN ! Dehana ! Dagoma ! Dembia Maksegnit ! Gwehala ! ! Chuahit Town ! ! ! Salya Town Gaz Gibla ! Infranz Gorgora Town ! ! Quara Gelegu Town Takusa Dalga Town ! ! Ebenat Kobo Town Adis Zemen Town Bugna ! ! ! Ambo Meda TownEbinat ! ! Yafiga Town Kobo ! Gidan Libo Kemkem ! Esey Debr Lake Tana Lalibela Town Gomenge ! Lasta ! Muja Town Robit ! ! ! Dengel Ber Gobye Town Shahura ! ! ! Wereta Town Kulmesk Town Alfa ! Amedber Town ! ! KUNIZILA TOWN ! Debre Tabor North Wollo ! Hara Town Fogera Lay Gayint Weldiya ! Farta ! Gasay! Town Meket ! Hamusit Ketrma ! ! Filahit Town Guba Lafto ! AFAR South Gonder Sal!i Town Nefas mewicha Town ! ! Fendiqa Town Zege Town Anibesema Jawi ! ! ! MersaTown Semen Achefer ! Arib Gebeya YISMALA TOWN ! Este Town Arb Gegeya Town Kon Town ! ! ! ! Wegel tena Town Habru ! Fendka Town Dera
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT of CHALLENGES of SUSTAINABLE RURAL WATER SUPPLY: QUARIT WOREDA, AMHARA REGION a Project Paper Presented to the Facult
    ASSESSMENT OF CHALLENGES OF SUSTAINABLE RURAL WATER SUPPLY: QUARIT WOREDA, AMHARA REGION A Project Paper Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Professional Studies by Zemenu Awoke January 2012 © 2012 Zemenu Awoke Alemeyehu ABSTRACT Sustainability of water supplies is a key challenge, both in terms of water resources and service delivery. The United Nations International Children’s Fund (UNICEF) estimates that one third of rural water supplies in sub-Saharan Africa are non- operational at any given time. Consequently, the objective of this study is to identify the main challenges to sustainable rural water supply systems by evaluating and comparing functional and non-functional systems. The study was carried out in Quarit Woreda located in West Gojjam, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. A total of 217 water supply points (169 hand-dug wells and 50 natural protected springs) were constructed in the years 2005 to 2009. Of these water points, 184 were functional and 33 were non-functional. Twelve water supply systems (six functional and six non-functional) among these systems were selected. A household survey concerning the demand responsiveness of projects, water use practices, construction quality, financial management and their level of satisfaction was conducted at 180 households. All surveyed water projects were initiated by the community and the almost all of the potential users contributed money and labor towards the construction of the water supply point. One of the main differences between the functional and non-functional system was the involvement of the local leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Debre Markos-Gondar Road
    The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ethiopian Roads Authority , / International Development Association # I VoL.5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE FIVE Public Disclosure Authorized ROADS SELECTED FOR REHABILITATION AND/OR UPGRADING DEBRE MARKOS-GONDAR ROAD # J + & .~~~~~~~~i-.. v<,,. A.. Public Disclosure Authorized -r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - -':. a _- ..: r. -. * .. _, f_ £ *.. "''" Public Disclosure Authorized Final Report October 1997 [rJ PLANCENTERLTD Public Disclosure Authorized FYi Opastinsilta6, FIN-00520HELSINKI, FINLAND * LJ Phone+358 9 15641, Fax+358 9 145 150 EA Report for the Debre Markos-Gondar Road Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................... i ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................... iv GENERALMAP OF THE AREA ........................... v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................... vi I. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Location of the StudyArea. 1 1.3 Objectiveof the Study. 1 1.4 Approachand Methodologyof the Study. 2 1.5 Contentsof the Report. 3 2. POLICY,LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONALFRAMEWORK ....... 4 2.1 Policy Framework..Framewor 4 2.2 Legal Framework..Framewor 6 2.3 InstitutionalFramework. .Framewor 8 2.4 Resettlement and Compensation .12 2.5 Public Consultation 15 3. DESCRIPTIONOF THE PROPOSEDROAD PROJECT........... 16 4. BASELINEDATA ............. ........................... 18 4.1 Descriptionof the Road.18 4.2 Physical Environment nvironmt. 20 4.2.1 Climate and hydrology ................. 20 4.2.2 Physiography ............ ....... 21 4.2.3 Topography and hydrography ............ 21 4.2.4 Geology ....... ............ 21 4.2.5 Soils and geomorphology ................ 21 4.3 BiologicalEnvironment......................... 22 4.3.1 Land use and land cover .22 4.3.2 Flora .22 4.3.3 Fauna .22 4.4 Human and Social Environent .23 4.4.1 Characteristics of the population living by/alongthe road .....................
    [Show full text]