Grand County Scenic Byways Corridor Management Plan Grand County, Utah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grand County Scenic Byways Corridor Management Plan Grand County, Utah Grand County Scenic Byways Corridor Management Plan Grand County, Utah SR-128—Upper Colorado River Scenic Byway SR-279—Potash–Lower Colorado River Scenic Byway SR-313—Dead Horse Mesa Scenic Byway (with Island in the Sky Road) Prepared for Grand County, Utah by Randolph Jorgen, Moab, Utah August, 2008 Grand County Scenic Byways Corridor Management Plan Grand County, Utah SR-128—Upper Colorado River Scenic Byway SR-279—Potash–Lower Colorado River Scenic Byway SR-313—Dead Horse Mesa Scenic Byway (with Island in the Sky Road) Prepared for Grand County, Utah Researched, written, and designed by Randolph Jorgen, Moab, Utah Changes made by the Grand County Scenic Byway Committee August, 2008 The author wishes to thank members of the Scenic Byway Committee and other managers and citizens of Grand County who helped devise strategies to keep the byways the special places they are. Text © 2008 Randolph Jorgen. Used by permission. All photos © 2008 Randolph Jorgen unless otherwise noted. Use or reproduction for purposes other than those of this document is prohibited without written permission. Maps p. 1 and p. 2 by Mike Price, Entrada/San Juan, Inc. Cover photos: Top: Central section of SR-128. Bottom left: Monitor and Merrimac Buttes, SR-313. Bottom right: Colorado River at The Portal, SR-279. ii CONTENTS Maps ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Grand County scenic byway corridors .......................................................................................... 3 1.1 Quick tour: SR-128—Upper Colorado River Scenic Byway .................................................................... 3 1.2 Quick tour: SR-279—Potash–Lower Colorado River Scenic Byway ....................................................... 5 1.3 Quick tour: SR-313—Dead Horse Mesa Scenic Byway (with Island in the Sky Road) ............................ 6 2. Purposes of the corridor management plan (CMP) ..................................................................... 8 3. Public involvement .......................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Scenic Byway Committee (SBC) and the CMP consultant ....................................................................... 9 3.2 Key persons consultations ......................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Public participation .................................................................................................................................. 10 3.3.1 Agency public involvement processes • 3.3.2 Public meetings and written comments • 3.3.3 SBC and Grand County Council review and public comment period • 3.3.4 Future public involvement 4. Key findings and priorities: Citizens’ desired future for the scenic byways ........................... 11 4.1 The Grand County community ................................................................................................................ 11 4.2 Vision, goals, and guiding principles ....................................................................................................... 12 4.3 Achieving our goals ................................................................................................................................. 13 5. Land ownership, administration, and uses ................................................................................. 13 5.0.1 Public lands • 5.0.2 Atlas mill site (UMTRA) • 5.0.3 Private lands • 5.0.4 National park lands • 5.0.5 Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands • 5.0.6 Utah Sovereign Lands • 5.0.7 Utah State Park lands • 5.0.8 Utah Department of Transportation rights-of-way 6. Intrinsic resources and their significance ................................................................................... 14 6.1 Scenic resources: Internationally significant ........................................................................................... 15 6.2 Natural resources: Internationally significant .......................................................................................... 17 6.2.1 Geology • 6.2.2 Plants • 6.2.3 Wildlife • 6.2.4 Special status species • 6.2.5 Soils • 6.2.6 Wilderness 6.3 Recreational resources: Internationally significant .................................................................................. 20 6.3.1 Sightseeing and photography • 6.3.2 Camping and picnicking • 6.3.3 Multi-use trails: jeeping, biking, and hiking • 6.3.4 Bicycling • 6.3.5 Hiking • 6.3.6 Rafting and boating • 6.3.7 Rock climbing • 6.3.8 Wildlife viewing • 6.3.9 Star watching • 6.3.10 Horseback riding • 6.3.11 Cultural tourism 6.4 Historical resources: Regionally significant ............................................................................................ 24 6.5 Cultural expressions: Internationally significant ..................................................................................... 25 6.5.1 Ranching and open-range grazing • 6.5.2 Global recognition through filmmaking • 6.5.3 Events 6.6 Archaeological resources: Regionally significant.................................................................................... 26 7. Visitor experience plan ................................................................................................................. 26 8. Visitor services and facilities ........................................................................................................ 27 8.0.1 Information services • 8.0.2 Emergency services/law enforcement • 8.0.3 Phone service • 8.0.4 Campgrounds • 8.0.5 Picnic areas • 8.0.6 Restrooms • 8.0.7 Trails • 8.0.8 Lodging, dining, gasoline, retail, and mechanic services • 8.0.9 Water • 8.0.10 Recreational rentals and tours • 8.0.11 Common carrier byways access 9. Resource protection and enhancement ....................................................................................... 31 9.1 Goals ........................................................................................................................................................ 31 9.2 Agency-specific strategies ....................................................................................................................... 31 9.2.1 Grand County • 9.2 2 Department of Energy (DOE) • 9.2.3 Bureau of Land Management • 9.2.4 National Park Service (NPS) • 9.2.5 Utah State Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) • 9.2.6 Utah Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands (FFSL) • 9.2.7 Utah Division of State Parks and Recreation (State Parks) • 9.2.8 Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) 9.3 Issue-specific concerns and strategies ..................................................................................................... 36 9.3.1 Scenic preservation/enhancement • 9.3.2 Mining and drilling • 9.3.3 Recreation management: general • 9.3.4 OHVs, bicycles, trails, and recreational conflicts • 9.3.5 Camping • 9.3.6 Climbing • 9.3.7 Special events • 9.3.8 Wild and scenic rivers • 9.3.9 Wilderness designations • 9.3.10 Ecosystems and wildlife • 9.3.11 Invasive species • 9.3.12 Soil crusts • 9.3.13 Air quality • 9.3.14 Noise pollution • 9.3.15 Dark night skies • 9.3.16 Archaeological resources • 9.3.17 Paleontological resources • 9.3.18 Historical resources • 9.3.19 Litter control • 9.3.20 Law enforcement • 9.3.21 Scientific research 9.4 Project funding priorities ......................................................................................................................... 49 iii 10. Interpretation and information services ................................................................................... 49 10.1 Goals ...................................................................................................................................................... 49 10.2 Guidelines .............................................................................................................................................. 50 10.3 Existing facilities, services, and products .............................................................................................. 50 10.4 Themes .................................................................................................................................................. 51 10.5 On-site interpreters ................................................................................................................................ 51 10.6 Recommended new electronic and print products ................................................................................. 51 10.6.1 Guidelines • 10.6.2 Products 10.7 Roadside facilities .................................................................................................................................. 52 10.7.1 Guidelines • 10.7.2 Facilities 10.8 Funding priorities .................................................................................................................................. 52 10.9 How a National Scenic Byway would be interpreted ............................................................................ 53 11. Highway design, operation, maintenance, and improvements ................................................ 53 11.1 Goals ..................................................................................................................................................... 53 11.2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Majestic Moab
    ABOUT WORLD RECENT ISSUES E-MAIL US FREE INFORMATION MAGAZINE ADVERTISE LINKS & RESOURCES APRILAAAW 2 013 RLD TRAVEL GUIDE MOAB, UTAH This tiny town on Utah’s eastern border is an outdoor-lover’s paradise. Text and photos by Rebecca L. Rhoades Majestic Moab I’M HEADING DOWN HIGHWAY 279, also known They’re climbers, and they’re tackling other holes to use,” says Drew Peterson Wall Street, one of the most popular of Bend, Oregon. “There are thousands as Potash Road, on my way to view some ancient climbing spots in the region. This of climbing routes in these canyons, so approximately one-mile-long stretch, you can pick and choose depending on Anasazi petroglyphs when I see them. At first, they where 500-foot-tall Navajo sandstone your style.” cliffs meet the Colorado River, is just Peterson, a native of Lancaster, appear simply as brightly colored dots high on the outside the town confines of Moab, Pennsylvania, has been traveling the red-rock cliffs that hem the western side of the road. Utah, a destination renowned for country for two months with friends, outdoor and extreme adventures. seeking out great rock-climbing As I get closer, I notice more colorful figures on the “The sandstone here is really good for destinations. It is his first day in Moab what climbers call ‘crack climbing.’ You when I meet him. ground and ropes attached to the shapes above. just climb the cracks; there are very few “Moab is definitely an international ABOUT WORLD RECENT ISSUES E-MAIL US FREE INFORMATION MAGAZINE ADVERTISE LINKS & RESOURCES APRILAAAW 2 013 RLD TRAVEL GUIDE MOAB, UTAH destination for this type of climbing,” he says.
    [Show full text]
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) I Acv j ..a °" "^ i^e!<►)e ^r^}er Rim ^^^ the 1Q*re*t of wly arel w* d ►s- ,9*W,Ratieie of Wh Reaouries Survey ProgMM iobrmaiion and without liability ^CH00 #or Mry M Fade o thereof," ^ atK , !t4 O 'er E7.6- 1 0.1 9.9. s. z \IS74 GEOLOGIC INTERPRETATION OF SKYLAB PHOTOGRAPHS by Keenan Lee and Robert J. Weimer Remote Sensing Report 75-6 EREP Investigations 380 Contract NAS9-13394 National Aeronautics and Space Administration 8618 ON OF N /b-1 (E76 - 10199) GEOLOGIC INTERPRETATI SKYLAB PHOTOGRAPHS (Cclorado School CSCL 086 Mines) 85 p HC $5.00 Unclas G3/43 00199 December 1975 044: G: O ^d ci b C!] r4y ^ ^ x Frontispiece. View eastward from Island in the Sky area of Canyonlands National Park, across the canyon of the Colorado River, to the La Sal Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • SW CASC Science Agenda 2013-2018
    Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Climate Science Center 2013 Strategic Science Agenda Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Relation of the Southwest Climate Science Center to the Stakeholder Advisory Committee and Partners 5 Climatic Context of the Southwest ............................................................................................................... 6 Vision ........................................................................................................................................................... 13 Guiding Principles ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Goals of the Southwest Climate Science Center ......................................................................................... 14 Leadership goal ............................................................................................................................ 14 Research goal ............................................................................................................................ 14 Synthesis goal ............................................................................................................................ 15 Critical Information Needs .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Major Landforms and Their Economic Significance MODULE - 2 Changing Face of the Earth 7 Notes MAJOR LANDFORMS and THEIR ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE
    Major Landforms and their Economic Significance MODULE - 2 Changing face of the Earth 7 Notes MAJOR LANDFORMS AND THEIR ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE You have learnt in the previous lesson that the landforms found on the earth’s surface are the result of interplay between internal and external forces. The soft rocks are easily worn down by these forces. While the relatively harder rocks are not so easily worn down. Therefore, rocks have a great influence on the landforms developed in an area. The internal forces are perpetually elevating the earth’s surface and the external forces about which you will study in the next lessons are constantly wearing down such elevations to make ,the surface level. This is how various landforms are formed by constant action of agents of gradation. These landforms are not only the physical features of the earth’s surface but also the basis of human civilization. The major landforms found on the earth’s surface are mountains, plateaus and plains. In this lesson, we will study the major landforms of the earth and their economic importance for us. OBJECTIVES After studying this lesson you will be able to : differentiate among the three major landforms found on the earth’s surface; explain the process of formation of various landforms with the help of illustrations; classify mountains on the basis of their mode of formation; discuss the usefulness of mountains to man; list different types of plateaus and describe their economic significance; GEOGRAPHY 121 MODULE - 2 Major Landforms and their Economic Significance Changing face of the Earth enumerate major types of plains and explain their influence on human life; locate major mountains, plateaus and plains on the outline map of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Depositional Environment and Petrology of the White Rim
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The Depositional Environment and Petrology of the White Rim Sandstone Member of the Permian Cutler Formation, Canyonlands National Park, Utah by Brenda A. Steele-Mallory Open-File Report 82-204 1982 This report is preliminary and has not been been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................................................ 1 Introducti on..........................................................2 Methods of Study......................................................4 Geologic Setting......................................................6 Stratigrapic Relationships............................................9 Economic Geology.....................................................11 Field Observations................................................... 12 Sedimentary Structures..........................................12 Dune Genetic Unit..........................................12 Interdune Genetic Unit.....................................13 Miscellaneous Sedimentary Structures.......................20 Petrology....................................................... 23 Texture.................................................... 23 Mineralogy.................................................25 Bi ologi c Consti tuents...................................... 26 Chemical Constituents......................................26 Diagenetic Features........................................26
    [Show full text]
  • The Moki Messenger
    THE MOKI MESSENGER AUGUST 2019 SAN JUAN BASIN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY www.sjbas.org Next Meeting – August 14th Table of Contents Our next meeting will be held on Wednesday, August 14th, at 7:00 p.m. in the lyceum at the Center of Page 1 Next meeting – August 14th Southwest Studies at Fort Lewis College. After a brief Page 1 Volunteer Opportunities business meeting, Richard Friedman will present: Page 2 New AV system at Lyceum "Using Computer Technology to aid in the Page 2 Board Meeting Highlights – July 18th Identification, Documentation, and Visualization of the Page 2 SJBAS President’s Job Description th Chacoan Landscape (Built Environment)." There will be Page 3 John W. Sanders Lecture – September 14 Page 4 Four Corners Lectures Series - August a social at 6:30 p.m. in the CSWS foyer. Page 4 Field Trip Report – Local Rock Art – July 11th Page 5 New sites at Lone Mesa State Park Richard Friedman combines diverse skillsets in geology, Page 6 Upcoming Field Trips and Activities - 2019 remote sensing, archaeology, and new digital Page 7 CAS News technologies to study the Chaco world. He worked with Page 7 Regional Archaeology News the Navajo Nation Chaco Sites Protection Program to Page 9 SJBAS Officers and Board members document countless Great Houses and roads throughout the Four Corners region. Friedman is also a remote sensing expert who has studied Chaco roads for over 30 years using a variety of techniques including low sun angle aerial photography, thermal infrared multispectral imaging (TIMS), and most recently, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 State Park Land and Water Regulations SCHENDEL/CPW VERDON/CPW MUELLER/CPW SCHENDEL/CPW Cpw.State.Co.Us Map of Colorado State Parks
    COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE 2019 State Park Land and Water Regulations SCHENDEL/CPW VERDON/CPW MUELLER/CPW SCHENDEL/CPW cpw.state.co.us Map of Colorado state parks HIKING • BOATING • CABINS • BIRD WATCHING • FISHING • SCHENDEL/CPW SCHENDEL/CPW DELLIVENERI/CPW BIKING • HUNTING • NATURE PROGRAMS • WILDLIFE VIEWING • 2 Visit Your Beautiful 41 State Parks! CAMPING PICNICKING • OHV RIDING • ROCK CLIMBING SCHENDEL/CPW SCHENDEL/CPW DOSKOCIL/CPW PAPALEO/CPW RAFTING • GEOCACHING • SNOWMOBILING • SNOWSHOEING 3 Table of Contents CHAPTER P-1 - PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS ................... 7 ARTICLE 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS AND WATERS ...................... 7 #100 - PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS ..........................................7 CAMPING ...........................................................................................................8 FIRES ...........................................................................................................8 COMMERCIAL USE ...........................................................................................................8 BOAT DOCKS ...........................................................................................................8 GLASSWARE ...........................................................................................................8 NIGHT ACTIVITY ...........................................................................................................9 SWIM BEACH ...........................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Castle Valley Water Study Report Part 1
    HYDROLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF THE SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF CASTLE VALLEY, UTAH: PART 1: HYDROLOGIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (HESA) AND PRELIMINARY WATER BUDGET Authors: Dr. Kenneth E. Kolm, Hydrologic Systems Analysis, LLC., Golden, Colorado and Paul K.M. van der Heijde, Heath Hydrology, Inc., Boulder, Colorado Prepared For: Town of Castle Valley, Utah March 2016 Front Page: Town of Castle Valley, Utah (November 2013) Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………... 1 2. DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF HYDROLOGIC SYSTEMS OF THE CASTLE VALLEY (TCV) STUDY AREA ……………………..…………………….. 3 2.1 Climate ………………………………………………………………………….... 3 2.2 Topography and Geomorphology ………………………………………………... 6 2.3 Surface Water Characteristics and Springs ………………………………………. 9 2.4 Hydrogeologic Framework ………………………………………………………. 16 2.4.1 Regional Hydrogeologic Units ………………………………………… 17 2.4.2 Hydrogeologic Units of the TCV Area..…………………….………….. 20 2.4.3 Hydro-structural Units of the TCV Area ………………………………. 24 2.5 Groundwater Flow Systems …………………………………………………….... 28 2.6 Groundwater System Conceptual Site Models by Subsystem …….………….….. 31 2.6.1 La Sal Mountain Subsystems …………………………………………... 32 2.6.2 Hillslope and Valley Bottom Shallow Aquifer Subsystems ………….... 37 2.7 Anthropogenic Influences ……………………………………………………….. 40 2.7.1 Effects of Land Use Changes on Groundwater Systems …………….… 40 2.7.2 Potential Effects of Groundwater Use on Water Quality ……………… 42 2.7.2.1 Hillslope Subsystems Water Quality ………………………... 43 2.7.2.2 Valley Bottom
    [Show full text]
  • Owyhee High Plateau Major Land Resource Area (MLRA)
    MLRA 25 – Owyhee High Plateau (Utah portion) MLRA 25 – Owyhee High Plateau (Utah portion) Ecological Zone Upland Mountain High Mountain Subalpine Precipitation (inches) 12-17 inches 16-22 inches 16-22 inches 20-27 inches Elevation 5,000 -7,000 6,000 – 8,600 8,000-9,000 9,000 - 9,300 Soil Moisture Regime Typic Xeric Typic Xeric Typic Xeric Udic Soil Temp Regime Mesic Frigid Cryic Cryic Freeze free Days 80-120 60 - 90 30 - 40 20 -35 Mountain mahogany, Sagebrushes and Mountain big Aspen, Mountain big Subalpine Fir, browse Notes sagebrush sagebrush Subalpine sagebrush 300 – 500 and 1,100-2,100 and 2,400-2,500 lbs/ac 800 – 1000 lbs.ac 400-600 lbs/ac All values in this table are approximate and should be used as guidelines. Different combinations of temperature, precipitation and soil type can place an ecological site into different zones. Major Land Resource Area (MLRA) D25 D25 - Owyhee High Plateau E47A - and Ui D28A 030 60 120 Miles Great Salt 1:3,000,000 Lake Area 25—Owyhee High Plateau This area is in Nevada (52 percent),Idaho (29 percent), Oregon (16 percent), and Utah (3 percent). It makes up about 28,930 square miles (74,960 square kilometers). The city of Elko, Nevada, which is along Interstate 80, occurs in this MLRA. The Humboldt-Toiyabe and Sawtooth National Forests and numerous wilderness study areas also occur in this MLRA. Most of the wilderness study areas are in the high desert canyon lands of southern Idaho. The Duck Valley, South Fork, Ruby Valley, and Te-Moak Indian Reservations are in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Colorado Big Game APPLICATION & CORRECTION DEADLINE: APRIL 2 DEER ELK PRONGHORN MOOSE BEAR
    C OLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE 2019 Colorado Big Game APPLICATION & CORRECTION DEADLINE: APRIL 2 DEER ELK PRONGHORN MOOSE BEAR cpw.state.co.us ONLINE FEATURES Check out more Colorado Parks & Wildlife on our VIMEO & YOUTUBE CHANNELS VIDEOS: WHAT’S NEW: 2019 HOW TO APPLY FOR THE DRAW & ACCOUNT SET-UP 5-YEAR SEASON STRUCTURE: CPW NEEDS YOUR INPUT LIVIN’ THE WILDLIFE: ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK & SHIRAS MOOSE HUNTING IN WARM WEATHER © Justin Park 2019 BIG GAME BROCHURE CORRECTIONS UPDATED: JULY 17, 2019 Please see the Colorado Parks and Wildlife website at cpw.state.co.us/bg/regulations for complete regulation information. NOTE: THE ONLINE VERSION OF THE BROCHURE HAS THE MOST ACCURATE, UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION. PAGE CORRECTION AS PRINTED IN BROCHURE LICENSE OPTIONS, AVAILABILITY & DATES: LICENSE SALE DATES Information about reissued license availability was incorrect at the time of publication. The brochure stated that reissued licenses would not be available until Aug. 13. The correct information is: Reissued licenses will be available on the leftover 5 license list. (Leftover licenses will go on sale starting Aug. 6). All additional reissued page 5 hunt codes that aren’t on the initial leftover list will be added starting Aug. 13. The online version of the brochure has been updated with this correction. 2019 BIG GAME BROCHURE CORRECTIONS UPDATED: MARCH 20, 2019 Please see the Colorado Parks and Wildlife website at cpw.state.co.us/bg/regulations for complete regulation information. NOTE: THE ONLINE VERSION OF THE BROCHURE HAS THE MOST ACCURATE, UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION. PAGE CORRECTION AS PRINTED IN BROCHURE WHAT’S NEW: 2019; BEAR The list of GMUs for new List B bear licenses was incorrect at the time of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Right Track 2004 Annual Review Colorado Lottery a Division of the Colorado Department of Revenue
    We're on the Right Track 2004 Annual Review Colorado Lottery A division of the Colorado Department of Revenue COLORADO LOTTERY Looking n behalf of the Colorado Lottery, a division of the Colorado Department of ORevenue, I am pleased to present the calendar year 2004 annual review. And yes, the Colorado Lottery is "on the right track" in our efforts to maximize revenues, provide new and exciting games, and maintain our commitment to customer service Ahead and efficient operations. Through hard work and dedication, the Lottery was able to set new sales records in to 2005 2004, while at the same time identifying efficiencies that allowed us to return additional dollars to our proceeds recipients. s in 2004 The Lottery celebrated yet another successful year with sales over $408 million, breaking the previous calendar year record of $398 million in 2002. The Scratch product line once again led the way in setting the new sales record. In 2004, the Lottery sold more than The Colorado Lottery ended fiscal year 2004 by setting an The Colorado Lottery will undergo $274 million in Scratch tickets. all-time Scratch sales record of $260.9 million. a major computer conversion in Proceeds recipients received more than $ 104 million during 2005. Changes will include new, In addition, the Colorado Lottery began implementation of an entirely new computer game system and fiscal year 2004. This was the second-highest proceeds state-of-the-art terminals that introduced state-of-the-art Scratch game vending machines. These changes will provide the opportunity for produce Powerball, Lotto and distribution in the Lottery's 22-year history.
    [Show full text]