Final ULP PEIS 3: Affected Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final ULP PEIS 3: Affected Environment Final ULP PEIS 3: Affected Environment 1 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 2 3 4 The ROIs affected by the proposed action presented in the ULP PEIS are described for 5 each resource area evaluated (see Appendix D for additional discussion on the determination of 6 the ROIs). This site-specific information will be 7 used as the basis for evaluating the potential Regions of Influence (ROIs) for the Various Resource Areas Evaluated 8 impacts from the alternatives discussed in in the ULP PEIS 9 Chapter 4. 10 Air Quality: Mostly within 31 mi (50 km) from the 11 source(s) but up to several hundred miles, a minimal but cumulative contribution to air quality- 12 3.1 AIR QUALITY related values (such as visibility and acid 13 deposition) 14 Noise: Within 2–3 mi (3–5 km), from noise 15 3.1.1 Climate source(s) at best 16 Paleontological Resources: Lease tracts and any 17 other areas on adjacent lands that could be affected 18 3.1.1.1 General Climate by mining activities 19 Soil Resources: The lease tracts and any other 20 Wide variations in elevation and areas on adjacent lands (e.g., unpaved access roads) that could be affected by mining activities 21 topographic features within the area Water Resources: Montrose, Mesa, and 22 surrounding the ULP lease tracts have an San Miguel Counties, primarily on the lease tracts; 23 impact on wind patterns, temperatures, and also the Dolores River, San Miguel River, and their 24 storm tracks in all seasons (NCDC 2011a). The tributaries 25 area has a semi-arid, mid-continental climate Human Health: 50-mi (80-km) radius of the lease 26 characterized by abundant sunshine, low tracts 27 humidity, low precipitation, and cold, snowy Land Use: The lease tracts and land within a 25-mi 28 winters. Strong, outgoing terrestrial radiation (40-km) radius of each lease tract, with an 29 provides cool nights. In midwinter, air emphasis on specially designated public land areas 30 temperatures are often low, but strong solar Ecological Resources: Montrose, Mesa, and San Miguel Counties, primarily on the lease tracts; 31 radiation and dry air combine to provide the Dolores River, San Miguel River, and Colorado 32 generally pleasant conditions. River (for threatened and endangered species 33 evaluation only) 34 The local climate is strongly influenced Socioeconomics: Montrose, Mesa, and San Miguel 35 by microclimatic features such as slope, aspect, Counties 36 and elevation. The prevailing wind direction Environmental Justice: 50-mi (80-km) radius of 37 aloft over the region is from the west or the the lease tracts 38 southwest (the westerlies), as it is in most of the Transportation: 25-mi (40-km) radius from the 39 United States; however, complex terrains in boundary of the lease tracts 40 western Colorado are responsible for deflecting Cultural Resources: Lease tracts and any other areas on adjacent lands that could be affected by 41 these winds. Accordingly, wind patterns are mining activities 42 sometimes dissimilar even over short distances. Visual Resources: 25 mi (40 km) from the lease 43 tracts 44 The ULP lease tracts are located in Waste Management: Surface mine plants on the 45 southwestern Mesa County and in western lease tracts 46 Montrose and San Miguel Counties in 3-1 March 2014 Final ULP PEIS 3: Affected Environment 1 southwestern Colorado. The elevations of lease tracts range from 5,100 ft (1,500 m) to 8,000 ft 2 (2,439 m) with an average elevation of about 6,401 ft (1,951 m). The area surrounding the ULP 3 lease tracts is characterized by complex topography with valleys, canyons, and plateaus, so the 4 climate varies considerably from place to place. 5 6 7 3.1.1.2 Wind 8 9 Wind roses (which graphically display the distribution of wind speed and direction) are 10 presented here based on data available from weather stations in place for the proposed Piñon 11 Ridge Mill, because they are located in the center of the ULP lease tracts scattered over a wide 12 area. These stations are referred to as Site 1 (33-ft [10-m] level) and Site 2 (98-ft [30-m] level). 13 Data for a 3-year period (April 2008–March 2011) are shown in Figure 3.1-1 (Rogers 2011). The 14 proposed Piñon Ridge Mill site is located in the eastern Paradox Valley in western Montrose 15 County, which is roughly at the center of ULP lease tracts. The Paradox Valley is aligned in a 16 northwest–southeast direction. Winds are controlled in large part by the valley and ridge 17 topography. At Site 1 (33-ft [10-m] level), winds blow more frequently from the northwest and 18 southeast, reflecting the channeling of winds parallel to the valley axis. The annual average wind 19 speed is about 6.3 mph (2.8 m/s). Average wind speeds are highest in spring at 7.9 mph (3.5 m/s) 20 and lowest in winter at 4.6 mph (2.1 m/s). Prevailing wind directions are from the southeast 21 (about 14% of the time) and the east–southeast (about 14% of the time). Secondary prevalent 22 wind directions are from the northwest and west-northwest about 18% of the time combined. 23 Thus, about half of the time, upslope and downslope winds along the valley axis prevail. 24 However, effects of prevailing westerlies aloft are relatively minor at the surface. Northwesterly 25 upslope winds blow more frequently during daytime, while southeasterly downslope winds (also 26 called drainage winds) prevail at night. 27 28 Wind rose at Site 2 (98-ft [30-m] level) of the proposed Piñon Ridge Mill site, which is 29 located about 1.3 mi (2.1 km) south–southeast of Site 1 on the same valley floor but closer to the 30 valley wall, is provided in Figure 3.1-1(b). Wind patterns are somewhat different from those at 31 Site 1 (33-ft [10-m]) level. Daytime upslope winds observed are like those at Site 1, while 32 nighttime downslope winds are relatively weak. Typically, downslope winds are shallower than 33 upslope winds, with little or no turbulence because of the stable temperature structure of the air. 34 Throughout the year, westerly or southwesterly winds prevail at Site 2, especially during 35 nighttime hours, suggesting it is more affected by regional winds than by local flows. Average 36 wind speed at Site 2 is about 5.9 mph (2.6 m/s). As it is at Site 1, wind speed at Site 2 is highest 37 in spring and lowest in winter. Prevailing wind direction at Site 2 is from the west–northwest 38 (about 12% of the time) and secondarily is from the west (about 12% of the time). Winds that 39 range from the southeast clockwise to northwest sectors, which is the lower-left half of the valley 40 axis, account for more than three-fourths of the time. 41 42 Typically, wind speeds at higher elevations are faster than those at lower elevations 43 because of surface friction. However, the reverse is observed at the proposed Piñon Ridge Mill. 44 The upslope-downwind speed at Site 2 is lower than that at Site 1, which is located on the central 3-2 March 2014 3-3 March March 3-3 F inal ULPPEIS 1 2 (a) (b) 3 FIGURE 3.1-1 Wind Roses at the Proposed Piñon Ridge Mill, Montrose County, Colorado, April 2008–March 2011: (a) Site 1, 33-ft 4 (10-m) Level; and (b) Site 2, 98-ft (30-m) Level (Source: Rogers 2011) 5 3: AffectedEnvironmen 2014 t Final ULP PEIS 3: Affected Environment 1 valley floor, due to friction with the nearby valley wall at Site 2 and because local flows seem 2 somewhat stronger than regional westerly winds. 3 4 Aside from the weather stations at the proposed Piñon Ridge Mill, there is also a BLM 5 Remote Automated Weather Station at Nucla near the ULP lease tracts. Nucla station is located 6 outside the southeastern edge of Paradox Valley, about 2 mi (3 km) south of Nucla and about 7 11 mi (18 km) east of the proposed Piñon Ridge Mill site. However, wind patterns are quite 8 different from those at Piñon Ridge Mill. As shown in Figure 3.1-2, prevailing wind directions 9 are from the east throughout the year due to predominant nighttime drainage winds from the 10 San Miguel River valley to the east (DRI 2011). During daytime hours, effects of the San Miguel 11 River valley, which runs in a northwest–southeast direction, parallel those of the Paradox Valley, 12 and regional westerly winds are more prominent. 13 14 15 16 FIGURE 3.1-2 Wind Rose at 20-ft (6.1-m) Level at Nucla, Montrose 17 County, Colorado, 2006–2010 (Source: DRI 2011) 18 3-4 March 2014 Final ULP PEIS 3: Affected Environment 1 3.1.1.3 Temperature 2 3 Temperatures in the region vary widely with elevation, latitude, season, and time of day. 4 In western Colorado, topography plays a large role in determining the temperature of any 5 specific location (NCDC 2011a). The ULP lease tracts sit at a higher elevation; thus, 6 temperatures there are lower than at lower elevations of comparable latitude. Historical annual 7 average temperatures measured at selected meteorological stations around the ULP lease tracts 8 range from 45.3F (7.4C) in Northdale (about 10 mi [16 km] south of the southernmost ULP 9 lease tract at an elevation of 6,680 ft [2,040 m]) to 53.9F (12.2C) in Gateway 1 SE (about 6 mi 10 [10 km] northwest of the northernmost ULP lease tract at an elevation of 4,550 ft [1,390 m]), as 11 presented in Table 3.1-1 (WRCC 2011a; DRI 2011).
Recommended publications
  • San Luis Valley Conservation Area Land Protection Plan, Colorado And
    Land Protection Plan San Luis Valley Conservation Area Colorado and New Mexico December 2015 Prepared by San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex 8249 Emperius Road Alamosa, CO 81101 719 / 589 4021 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 6, Mountain-Prairie Region Branch of Refuge Planning 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80228 303 / 236 8145 CITATION for this document: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Land protection plan for the San Luis Valley Conservation Area. Lakewood, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 151 p. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service policy, an environmental assessment and land protection plan have been prepared to analyze the effects of establishing the San Luis Valley Conservation Area in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico. The environmental assessment (appendix A) analyzes the environmental effects of establishing the San Luis Valley Conservation Area. The San Luis Valley Conservation Area land protection plan describes the priorities for acquiring up to 250,000 acres through voluntary conservation easements and up to 30,000 acres in fee title. Note: Information contained in the maps is approximate and does not represent a legal survey. Ownership information may not be complete. Contents Abbreviations . vii Chapter 1—Introduction and Project Description . 1 Purpose of the San Luis Valley Conservation Area . 2 Vision for the San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex . 4 Purpose of the Alamosa and Monte Vista National Wildlife Refuges . 4 Purpose of the Baca national wildlife refuge . 4 Purpose of the Sangre de Cristo Conservation Area .
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Unaweep Tabeguache Byway Corridor Management Plan
    UNAWEEP-TABEGUACHE SCENIC AND HISTORIC BYWAY CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN UNAWEEP-TABEGUACHE SCENIC AND HISTORIC BYWAY CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN Embrace and maintain the area’s history, lifestyles, cultures and unique community spirit. Embrace and protect the natural beauty, outdoor experiences and recreation opportunities. Increase the economic viability and sustainability of Byway communities. Facilitate synergy and collaboration with all Byway communities, partners and governing agencies. The UTB Mission September 12, 2013 Advanced Resource Management, Inc. Advanced Resource Management, Inc.706 Nelson The Park National Drive Longmont, Trust CO 80503 for Historic 303-485-7889 Preservation Whiteman Consulting UNAWEEP-TABEGUACHE SCENIC AND HISTORIC BYWAY CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary……. ....................................................................... 3 2. Byway Overview……. ............................................................................. 6 3. Updating the CMP .................................................................................. 8 4. Intrinsic Qualities .................................................................................. 10 A. Archaeological Quality ..................................................................................... 11 B. Cultural Quality ................................................................................................ 12 C. Historic Quality ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Moki Messenger
    THE MOKI MESSENGER AUGUST 2019 SAN JUAN BASIN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY www.sjbas.org Next Meeting – August 14th Table of Contents Our next meeting will be held on Wednesday, August 14th, at 7:00 p.m. in the lyceum at the Center of Page 1 Next meeting – August 14th Southwest Studies at Fort Lewis College. After a brief Page 1 Volunteer Opportunities business meeting, Richard Friedman will present: Page 2 New AV system at Lyceum "Using Computer Technology to aid in the Page 2 Board Meeting Highlights – July 18th Identification, Documentation, and Visualization of the Page 2 SJBAS President’s Job Description th Chacoan Landscape (Built Environment)." There will be Page 3 John W. Sanders Lecture – September 14 Page 4 Four Corners Lectures Series - August a social at 6:30 p.m. in the CSWS foyer. Page 4 Field Trip Report – Local Rock Art – July 11th Page 5 New sites at Lone Mesa State Park Richard Friedman combines diverse skillsets in geology, Page 6 Upcoming Field Trips and Activities - 2019 remote sensing, archaeology, and new digital Page 7 CAS News technologies to study the Chaco world. He worked with Page 7 Regional Archaeology News the Navajo Nation Chaco Sites Protection Program to Page 9 SJBAS Officers and Board members document countless Great Houses and roads throughout the Four Corners region. Friedman is also a remote sensing expert who has studied Chaco roads for over 30 years using a variety of techniques including low sun angle aerial photography, thermal infrared multispectral imaging (TIMS), and most recently, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 State Park Land and Water Regulations SCHENDEL/CPW VERDON/CPW MUELLER/CPW SCHENDEL/CPW Cpw.State.Co.Us Map of Colorado State Parks
    COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE 2019 State Park Land and Water Regulations SCHENDEL/CPW VERDON/CPW MUELLER/CPW SCHENDEL/CPW cpw.state.co.us Map of Colorado state parks HIKING • BOATING • CABINS • BIRD WATCHING • FISHING • SCHENDEL/CPW SCHENDEL/CPW DELLIVENERI/CPW BIKING • HUNTING • NATURE PROGRAMS • WILDLIFE VIEWING • 2 Visit Your Beautiful 41 State Parks! CAMPING PICNICKING • OHV RIDING • ROCK CLIMBING SCHENDEL/CPW SCHENDEL/CPW DOSKOCIL/CPW PAPALEO/CPW RAFTING • GEOCACHING • SNOWMOBILING • SNOWSHOEING 3 Table of Contents CHAPTER P-1 - PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS ................... 7 ARTICLE 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS AND WATERS ...................... 7 #100 - PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS ..........................................7 CAMPING ...........................................................................................................8 FIRES ...........................................................................................................8 COMMERCIAL USE ...........................................................................................................8 BOAT DOCKS ...........................................................................................................8 GLASSWARE ...........................................................................................................8 NIGHT ACTIVITY ...........................................................................................................9 SWIM BEACH ...........................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Colorado Big Game APPLICATION & CORRECTION DEADLINE: APRIL 2 DEER ELK PRONGHORN MOOSE BEAR
    C OLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE 2019 Colorado Big Game APPLICATION & CORRECTION DEADLINE: APRIL 2 DEER ELK PRONGHORN MOOSE BEAR cpw.state.co.us ONLINE FEATURES Check out more Colorado Parks & Wildlife on our VIMEO & YOUTUBE CHANNELS VIDEOS: WHAT’S NEW: 2019 HOW TO APPLY FOR THE DRAW & ACCOUNT SET-UP 5-YEAR SEASON STRUCTURE: CPW NEEDS YOUR INPUT LIVIN’ THE WILDLIFE: ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK & SHIRAS MOOSE HUNTING IN WARM WEATHER © Justin Park 2019 BIG GAME BROCHURE CORRECTIONS UPDATED: JULY 17, 2019 Please see the Colorado Parks and Wildlife website at cpw.state.co.us/bg/regulations for complete regulation information. NOTE: THE ONLINE VERSION OF THE BROCHURE HAS THE MOST ACCURATE, UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION. PAGE CORRECTION AS PRINTED IN BROCHURE LICENSE OPTIONS, AVAILABILITY & DATES: LICENSE SALE DATES Information about reissued license availability was incorrect at the time of publication. The brochure stated that reissued licenses would not be available until Aug. 13. The correct information is: Reissued licenses will be available on the leftover 5 license list. (Leftover licenses will go on sale starting Aug. 6). All additional reissued page 5 hunt codes that aren’t on the initial leftover list will be added starting Aug. 13. The online version of the brochure has been updated with this correction. 2019 BIG GAME BROCHURE CORRECTIONS UPDATED: MARCH 20, 2019 Please see the Colorado Parks and Wildlife website at cpw.state.co.us/bg/regulations for complete regulation information. NOTE: THE ONLINE VERSION OF THE BROCHURE HAS THE MOST ACCURATE, UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION. PAGE CORRECTION AS PRINTED IN BROCHURE WHAT’S NEW: 2019; BEAR The list of GMUs for new List B bear licenses was incorrect at the time of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Right Track 2004 Annual Review Colorado Lottery a Division of the Colorado Department of Revenue
    We're on the Right Track 2004 Annual Review Colorado Lottery A division of the Colorado Department of Revenue COLORADO LOTTERY Looking n behalf of the Colorado Lottery, a division of the Colorado Department of ORevenue, I am pleased to present the calendar year 2004 annual review. And yes, the Colorado Lottery is "on the right track" in our efforts to maximize revenues, provide new and exciting games, and maintain our commitment to customer service Ahead and efficient operations. Through hard work and dedication, the Lottery was able to set new sales records in to 2005 2004, while at the same time identifying efficiencies that allowed us to return additional dollars to our proceeds recipients. s in 2004 The Lottery celebrated yet another successful year with sales over $408 million, breaking the previous calendar year record of $398 million in 2002. The Scratch product line once again led the way in setting the new sales record. In 2004, the Lottery sold more than The Colorado Lottery ended fiscal year 2004 by setting an The Colorado Lottery will undergo $274 million in Scratch tickets. all-time Scratch sales record of $260.9 million. a major computer conversion in Proceeds recipients received more than $ 104 million during 2005. Changes will include new, In addition, the Colorado Lottery began implementation of an entirely new computer game system and fiscal year 2004. This was the second-highest proceeds state-of-the-art terminals that introduced state-of-the-art Scratch game vending machines. These changes will provide the opportunity for produce Powerball, Lotto and distribution in the Lottery's 22-year history.
    [Show full text]
  • All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2020 INTRODUCTION and KEY
    All Grants Awarded Through Fiscal Year 2020 INTRODUCTION AND KEY This report is a list of all grants awarded by the Colorado Historical Society’s State Historical Fund (SHF) since its inception in 1992 (state Fiscal Year 1993) through the end of Fiscal Year 2020. The amounts listed are the original award amounts. If for some reason the entire grant amount was not used (i.e. a project was terminated or was completed under budget) the full amount awarded will appear. In other instances grant awards were increased either to enable project completion or to cover the costs of easements. In these instances, the additional award amount is shown in a separate entry as an increase. In those cases where no work was accomplished and the funds were either declined by the grant recipient or were required to be returned to the SHF through rescissions, no entry will appear. For this reason, projects listed in one version of this report may not appear in later versions, and the financial information shown in this report may not be comparable to other revenue reports issued by the SHF. Grants listed in this report are identified by project ID number. The first two characters in the project ID number represent the fiscal year from which the grant was scheduled to be paid. The state is on a July 1 – June 30 fiscal year. So, for example, all grants made between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2007 will be coded “07”. The next two characters identify the type of grant. In the case of grants that are awarded based on specific application due dates, the grant round in which the project was funded will be paired with either a letter or number.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Prepare Prepared
    Proposal to Prepare GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY PLAN OWENS VALLEY GROUNDWATER BASIN Prepared for County of Inyo Water Department Prepared by William R. Hutchison Independent Groundwater Consultant July 2018 Cover Letter July 30, 2018 Mr. Bob Harrington, Director Inyo County Water Department 135 S. Jackson Street Independence, California 93526 Subject: LSCE Team Proposal for Support Services to Develop a Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Owens Valley Groundwater Basin Dear Mr. Harrington: Luhdorff & Scalmanini Consulting Engineers (LSCE), in association with TEAM Engineering and Management Inc., Dr. Bill Hutchison, Pacific Agroecology, Consensus and Collaboration Program (CCP), and ERA Economics (ERA) are pleased to submit this proposal in response to the June 20, 2018 Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to develop a single Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for the Owens Valley Groundwater Basin. To assist the Owens Valley Groundwater Authority (OVGA, exclusive GSA for the Basin) with the development of a GSP, we have assembled this team of highly experienced firms. LSCE will serve as the prime contractor; TEAM will provide local support for many tasks in the scope; Bill Hutchison will support tasks relating to water budget analyses and lead the task related to evaluation of existing groundwater flow models and recommendations; Pacific Agroecology (PAE) will support tasks related to outreach to beneficial users, particularly as related to groundwater dependent ecosystems and fish habitat and ecological considerations; the Consensus and Collaboration Program (CCP) group will lead the preparation of a public engagement plan and activities necessary to comply with SGMA requirements for public outreach and communication; and ERA will prepare a cost and rate study and provide a preliminary evaluation of the economic and financial feasibility of projects and potential management actions.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Message
    A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE COLORADO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 17, ISSUE 1, Winter 2020 President’s Message In this column, I want to talk about Experimental Archaeology. It is a subject that may be of interest to chapters as a way for members to participate in archaeology. I am a member of the Egypt Work Group (EWG), which is an experimental archaeology group that emphasizes the archaeology of Ancient Egypt. It meets once a week in a classroom at the Denver Museum of Nature & Science (DMNS). All participants are DMNS volunteers and also are members of the Egyptian Study Society (ESS). ESS is similar in size and organization to the Denver Chapter of the Colorado Archaeological Society (Denver CAS). ESS and Denver CAS hold a joint lecture meeting in August of each year with the organizations alternating the hosting of the meeting. This year, the joint meeting will be hosted by ESS. The EWG sessions consist of the following: discussions by the participants of the results of research activities related to the current project; agreement as to the hands- on experiments to be conducted at that session; conducting the experiments; and reviewing the results. In the process, there is teamwork and much conversation. (Sometimes, there is more conversation than work.) Periodically, the EWG makes stand-up presentations at ESS meetings about the results of the projects. The next presentation is scheduled for October. Let me give you a couple of examples of EWG projects to give CAS chapters some ideas for possible projects. The current EWG project is investigating the wax cones that are depicted on the tops of the heads of Ancient Egyptians.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PARADOX TRAIL CONTACT INFORMATION Montrose West Recreation (MWR) United States Forest Service Established in 1995 by the Colorado Plateau Mountain Bike Trail P.O
    THE PARADOX TRAIL CONTACT INFORMATION Montrose West Recreation (MWR) United States Forest Service Established in 1995 by the Colorado Plateau Mountain Bike Trail P.O. Box 281 Norwood Ranger District Association (COPMOBA) in collaboration with Montrose West Nula, CO 81424 P.O. Box 388 — 1150 Forest Recreation, the US Forest Service, and the Bureau of Land Management, (970) 428-7880 Norwood, CO 81423 the 110 mile long Paradox Trail traverses the unique landscape of western www.montrosewest.com (970) 327-4261 Montrose County, utilizing some of the hundreds of miles of backcountry www.paradoxtrail.org www.fs.usda.gov jeep roads and trails that exist here. The route links two other long distant trails in the region, the Tabeguache Trail to the east on the Uncompahgre Colorado Plateau Mountain United States Forest Service Plateau and the Kokopelli Trail to the west in the La Sal Mountains of Bike Association (COPMOBA) Moab Ranger District Utah. Together, the three trails form the “Grand Loop”, a grueling 360 P.O. Box 4602 62 East 100 North mile backcountry system sure to challenge the strongest mountain bikers. Grand Junction, CO 81502 Moab, UT 84532 The Paradox Trail forms the southern leg of the Grand Loop and even (970) 244-8877 (435) 259-7155 though no singletrack was created (as of 2011) for the trail, the area offers www.copmoba.org www.fs.usda.gov trail users some of the most rugged and remote backcountry terrain in the lower 48. There are six large tracks of public lands being administered as Bureau of Land Management Nucla-Naturita Area wilderness or wilderness study areas in the region, and while the trail is Uncompahgre Field Office Chamber of Commerce predominantly on two-track, don’t be fooled thinking this is an easy or 2465 S Townsend Ave PO Box 425 fast ride.
    [Show full text]