DOCSLIB.ORG

EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER and STUDIES Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER and STUDIES Vol EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUDIES Vol EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUDIES Vol. 33, No. 1 Spring 2002 Auberon Waugh, 1939-2001 Auberon Waugh, eldest son of Evelyn Waugh, died at his home, Combe Florey in Somerset, in January 2001. He was 61 years old. Tributes came from luminaries such as V. S. Naipaul; others preferred to dance on his grave. Many of Auberon Waugh’s English obituaries can still be read at Doubting Hall. Auberon Waugh’s American obituaries were consistently positive, perhaps because of distance. Both the New York Times and the Philadelphia Inquirer compared him to Jonathan Swift; as a “scourge of pomposity and hypocrisy” (Times, 18 Jan. 2001), Auberon Waugh would have been the first to denounce such a pretentious stretch. The Times noted that he was a “charming and courteous man,” while the Inquirer described him as a “beaming figure, generous, hospitable, and invariably well-mannered.” Drawing heavily on Auberon Waugh’s autobiography, Will This Do? (1991), the Times managed to make a few errors and neglected to mention the “Bad Sex Awards.” The Inquirer duly observed that Auberon Waugh “delighted in presenting . an annual accolade feared by novelists and awarded for the ‘worst, most embarrassing or most redundant description of the sexual act’” (18 Jan. 2001). What has not been said is that Auberon Waugh was a friend of scholarship. He is acknowledged, often in first place, in books written or edited by Mark Amory, Alain Blayac, Artemis Cooper, Michael Davie, Paul A. Doyle, Donat Gallagher, Robert R. Garnett, Selina Hastings, Charlotte Mosley, and Martin Stannard. Auberon Waugh also wrote introductions to books by Iain Gale and Annette Wirth. Auberon Waugh occasionally contributed to Evelyn Waugh Newsletter and Studies. His autobiography is an invaluable record of his family’s private life, especially his father’s idiosyncrasies. His father referred to one of his son’s headmasters as “The Conjurer,” and on a visit to the school Evelyn Waugh watched the headmaster’s “every movement with exaggerated attention as if he expected him to draw a rabbit from his pocket.” If Auberon Waugh had been more circumspect, we would know less about Evelyn Waugh’s life and its relationship to his writing. I was fortunate enough to acknowledge Auberon Waugh in my last book. I proposed a visit, and he invited me to luncheon. The food was excellent: roast chicken, rice, and salad, with cheese, fruit, and coffee afterward. Auberon Waugh served claret; later I acquired his and his wife’s The Entertaining Book (1986) and read that chicken impels the host “to upgrade the wine . or guests will feel they are being short-changed.” I certainly did not feel that way: I was shown a number of relics of Evelyn Waugh, including his grave, and Auberon Waugh submitted to yet another interview. Auberon Waugh’s encouragement of scholars is curious, since his mother was shy, his father notoriously hostile to those in search of material for theses. Auberon Waugh won an exhibition to Christ Church, Oxford, a feat that impressed even his father. He followed his father’s advice, however, switched from English to Politics Philosophy and Economics (PP&E), lost interest, and dropped out after a year. Though he never became an academic, Auberon Waugh recognized the importance of scholarship in the long-term evaluation of a writer. Many inquisitors were interested only in his father, and he graciously yielded. Through the years of questions that must have grown tedious, Auberon Waugh earned a modest kind of immortality: anyone who writes about Evelyn Waugh should be grateful to the memory of his eldest son. Auberon Waugh is the third of Evelyn Waugh’s children to pass away. He is survived by his wife, two brothers, two sisters, two sons, two daughters, and several grandchildren, nieces and nephews. (JHW) file:////uol.le.ac.uk/...c144/My%20Documents/Evelyn%20Waugh/Evelyn%20Waugh%20Studies/Newsletters/Newsletters/Newsletter_33.1.htm[04/12/2013 14:44:43] EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUDIES Vol My Father the Anarchist by Alexander Waugh In his autobiography, Will This Do?, Auberon Waugh touched on the problem of writing about his father. “I had thought, at one stage, of a short memoir of Evelyn Waugh but could not decide what to call him: Evelyn? Unthinkable. Papa? Too sentimental. Waugh? I did not dare. The problem remains unresolved . .” I face the same anxieties now. To his face I called him Papa (pronounced “Pupper,” not “Puppah,” as he called Evelyn), but I blush to see that word in print. From here on in, let us call him Edwidge. He would not have minded in the least, for names were a constant confusion to him, even within the family. For the first eight or ten years of my life, he addressed me as “Fat Fool.” I was very happy with this, even introducing myself at parties as “Fat Fool, pleased to meet you!” but someone earnest must have told him to desist and at some point, Fat Fool disappeared to be replaced with a string of names that weren’t mine: Timmy, Nidge, Roge, Jockey (once when he saw my flies were undone); every time it was different, but I don’t think he ever called me Alexander. Perhaps the closest he got was “Arlex” in a satirical Scottish accent once or twice. When my father-in-law (who is also called Alexander) came to stay, Edwidge threw up his hands in dismay. “This is too confusing,” he said, “I shall have to call you Billy 1 and Billy 2.” Faces were just as confusing to him as names. He often upset people by failing to recognize them, but the problem was much graver than they realized. He once sat next to one of my sisters on a train and talked to her for ten minutes, eventually inquiring “Do you have children of your own? ” Sophia was stunned. “It’s me!” she cried. “Ah, Sophia, how lovely to see you!” Edwidge was a workaholic, up at crack of dawn, writing till lunch time, back after lunch at his desk, there until supper, often retiring to the library after supper as well, all through the holidays, even on Christmas Day. He could not live without his work and on the rare occasions that he rested would feel distinctly queer: “For a week I have done no work at all,” he wrote in his diary, “and marvel at the stamina of the English, who somehow manage to do none all their lives. After a few days, I found myself in a state of nervous exhaustion and moral collapse.” But his workaholism somehow never excluded other passions. He was a brilliant croquet player, loved bridge, collected polished stones and, as is well known, was an expert on wine and libel law, but ultimately he strove only for simple pleasures. “I would be surprised,” he said, “if there is any greater happiness than that provided by a game of croquet played on an English lawn through a summer’s afternoon, after a good luncheon and with a reasonable prospect of a good dinner ahead.” Inevitably, with his mind so much on his work, there was a detectable va et viens between the articles he was writing and the conversations we had at meal times. When I was chucked by a school girlfriend and made a pimply speech to the whole family, he listened quietly as I squeaked and squealed “I never want another girlfriend as long as I live!” (hammering the table) “Girls are odious!” The next day Edwidge called me into the library for a talk—an extremely rare event that must have happened no more than three times in my life. I was apprehensive and stood stiffly in front of his desk waiting for him to speak: “My dear boy,” he said, “the anus was designed for the retention and expulsion of faecal matter, not for the reception of foreign organs, however lovingly placed there.” I left the room, clutching my sides with laughter and was not surprised to see the sentence repeated a few years later in an article he wrote for the Spectator. As a rule he hated bossing as much as he hated being bossed and so, as children, we were seldom if ever disciplined by him. He believed that good behavior, particularly good manners, were taught by example and could never be learned by any system of punishment however subtly contrived. If anyone tried to boss him, he would automatically do the reverse to that which the bosser had intended. His pathological dislike of politicians was grounded in a belief that they only entered politics in the first place to satisfy craven power urges. “The problem with democracy,” he wrote, “is that it is not democracy at all but a zealotocracy or rule by file:////uol.le.ac.uk/...c144/My%20Documents/Evelyn%20Waugh/Evelyn%20Waugh%20Studies/Newsletters/Newsletters/Newsletter_33.1.htm[04/12/2013 14:44:43] EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUDIES Vol enthusiasts. This is a polite way of saying that as many bossy people as possible get a chance to throw their weight around. It may be lovely for bossy people who like deciding how the rest of us should live, but it is hell for those at the receiving end.” Walking into Westminster Cathedral for a memorial service a few years ago, he spotted a bright plastic sign stuck to its medieval doors, a circular traffic-style notice with a picture of an ice cream and a diagonal red line drawn across it. “Fascists!” he said as he walked past. If he had had the time, I am sure he would have doubled back to buy an ice cream and lick it noisily during the service.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Analysis on the Novels of Evelyn Waugh and Their Adaptations Evan J
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2016 The alueV of Attending University: An Analysis on the Novels of Evelyn Waugh and their Adaptations Evan J. Molineux Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Molineux, Evan J., "The alueV of Attending University: An Analysis on the Novels of Evelyn Waugh and their Adaptations" (2016). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 1407. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1407 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College The Value of Attending University: An Analysis on the Novels of Evelyn Waugh and their Adaptations submitted to Professor Kathryn Stergiopoulos by Evan Molineux for Senior Thesis Spring 2016 April 25, 2016 i Table of Contents Acknowledgements I. Introduction . 1 – 7 II. The Transformative Effects of Oxford in Brideshead Revisited . 8 - 30 III. Paul Pennyfeather’s Chaotic Journey through Decline and Fall . 31 - 55 IV. The Bright Young Things of Vile Bodies . 56 - 70 V. The Reaffirming Power of Evelyn Waugh Through Film and Television . 71 - 85 Works Cited ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Professor Kathryn Stergiopoulos, for her patience, guidance, support, and constructive criticism over the past two semesters. Without her or her colloquiums, this thesis would not have been nearly as enjoyable to work on. I would also like to thank the rest of the literature department for helping to nurture my love for a subject that I have truly enjoyed studying over the past four years.
    [Show full text]
  • Displacement and Exile in Evelyn Waugh's Post-War Fiction
    Brno Studies in English Volume 42, No. 2, 2016 ISSN 0524-6881 DOI: 10.5817/BSE2016-2-6 Carlos Villar Flor Displacement and Exile in Evelyn Waugh’s Post-War Fiction Abstract Evelyn Waugh’s later fiction, especially his acclaimed trilogy known as Sword of Honour, is an indispensable source for a first-hand depiction of Britain’s in- volvement in the Second World War. Waugh’s millitary service in Croatia from 1944 to 1945 strengthened his concern for the predicament of the displaced per- sons and exiles he met there. Perhaps the clearest evidence of this new aware- ness is the privileged space that such characters find in these stories and the degree to which their suffering permeates the narratives they inhabit. My paper discuses Waugh’s treatment of displacement and exile in the final stages of the war trilogy and provides a historical background to his presentation of displaced persons, using Papastergiadis’s concept of deterritorialization as analytical tool. Keywords Evelyn Waugh; Sword of Honour; Scott-King’s Modern Europe; displacement; war refugees; World War II in literature For a first-hand depiction of Britain’s involvement in the Second World War, Evelyn Waugh’s later fiction is an indispensable source, especially his war trilogy known as Sword of Honour, which has received considerable critical acclaim.1 Very little, however, has been said about Waugh’s treatment of displacement and exile, even though these issues play a vital role in the final stages of the war tril- ogy. My paper sets out to fill this critical gap by providing a historical background to Waugh’s presentation of displaced persons, individuals removed from their na- tive country as refugees or prisoners who have managed to survive the slaughter but at the cost of becoming homeless, dispossessed and materially or spiritually humiliated.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Talk in the Novel: the Distribution of Tea and Talk in a Scene from Evelyn Waugh’S Black Mischief
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Bournemouth University Research Online Multiparty Talk in the Novel: The Distribution of Tea and Talk in a Scene from Evelyn Waugh’s Black Mischief Bronwen E. Thomas Linguistics and Literature, Bournemouth University Abstract This article argues that studies of fictional dialogue have hitherto neglected the specific dynamics of multiparty talk. I will contend that this neglect contributes to the perpetuation of an ‘‘ideal’’ of conversation that allows no space for either the frus- trations and inequalities of such encounters or the unique pleasures they may bring to the reader. I urge the importance of distinguishing between group talk, in which there is some element of cohesion and shared goals, and multiparty talk, in which the representation foregrounds fragmentation and explores the often subtle power games played by the participants. Focusingon a scene from EvelynWaugh’s Black Mis- chief ( []), I argue that Waugh is sensitive to the dynamics of multiparty talk while orchestrating the representation for comic effect. I propose that analyzing such scenes of multiparty talk must make us reassess not only how we theorize fictional dialogue, but how far our models of everyday speech serve to privilege and univer- salize certain conversational practices and mechanisms based almost exclusively on the duologue. Multiparty Talk: Some Preliminaries The study of literary representations of speech has been largely preoccu- pied with what Andrew Kennedy () has called the ‘‘duologue of per- sonal encounter.’’ This has meant that little attention has been given to The excerpt from Black Mischief (copyright © Evelyn Waugh ) is reproduced by permis- sion of PFD on behalf of the Evelyn Waugh Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • An Eden with No Snake in It: Pure Comedy and Chaste Camp in The
    An Eden With No Snake in It: Pure Comedy and Chaste Camp in the English Novel by Joshua Gibbons Striker Department of English Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Victor Strandberg, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Katherine Hayles, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Kathy Psomiades ___________________________ Michael Moses Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 ABSTRACT An Eden With No Snake in It: Pure Comedy and Chaste Camp in the English Novel by Joshua Gibbons Striker Department of English Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Victor Strandberg, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Katherine Hayles, Co-Supervisor ___________________________ Kathy Psomiades ___________________________ Michael Moses An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 Copyright by Joshua Gibbons Striker 2019 Abstract In this dissertation I use an old and unfashionable form of literary criticism, close reading, to offer a new and unfashionable account of the literary subgenre called camp. Drawing on the work of, among many others, Susan Sontag, Rita Felski, and Peter Lamarque, I argue that P.G. Wodehouse, E.F. Benson, and Angela Thirkell wrote a type of pure comedy I call chaste camp. Chaste camp is a strange beast. On the one hand it is a sort of children’s literature written for and about adults; on the other hand it rises to a level of literary merit that children’s books, even the best of them, cannot hope to reach.
    [Show full text]
  • EVELYN WAUGH STUDIES Vol
    EVELYN WAUGH STUDIES Vol. 48, No. 2 Fall 2017 CONTENTS Paul Pennyfeather and the Victorian Governess: 2 The Rejection of Nineteenth-Century Idealism in Decline and Fall Ellen O’Brien Put Out More Flags and Literary Tradition 13 Robert Murray Davis REVIEWS Fictional Counterparts 19 Commando General: The Life of Major General Sir Robert Laycock KCMG CB DSO, by Richard Mead. Reviewed by Donat Gallagher A Slow Build 25 Evelyn Waugh’s Satire: texts and Contexts, by Naomi Milthorpe. NEWS A Personal Note I Owe It All to Brideshead 29 David Bittner Evelyn Waugh Studies 2 Paul Pennyfeather and the Victorian Governess: The Rejection of Nineteenth-Century Idealism in Decline and Fall Ellen O’Brien Much has been written on the disputed use of satire in Evelyn Waugh’s first novel.1 While critics have offered various readings of the satirical elements in Decline and Fall (1928), the novel also invites discussion of the role of parody, farce, black humour, burlesque, the bildungsroman, the picaresque and the anti-hero in creating an amusing but damning representation of society between the wars. This difficulty identifying a clear style is possibly due to the elusive nature of Waugh’s moral critique, which is so subtle as to be “everywhere felt but nowhere expressed” (Heath 77). His satirical target has been variously described as the “the beastliness of undergraduate societies and the leniency of college authorities toward wealthy and aristocratic members… the morals and outlook of ‘smart’ society,” the mismanagement of private boarding schools, the prison system, and modern religion, (Nichols 51) and more broadly as “inconsistency, hypocrisy, cruelty and folly… a satirical engagement with contemporary anxieties about English cultural decline in the years following the Great War” (Milthorpe 2, 20).
    [Show full text]
  • EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER and STUDIES Volume 27, Number 3 Winter 1993
    EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUDIES Volume 27, Number 3 Winter 1993 BARD IA MARTIN STANNARD'S MILITARY MUDDLE By Donat Gallagher (James Cook University, Australia) When reading Martin Stannard's No Abiding City [entitled Evelyn Waugh, The Later Years in the USA], for review, I was struck by what seemed an exceptionally large number of factual errors, unsupported claims, imputations of motive, overstatements and misreadings. The inaccuracy seemed so pervasive as to undermine the book's value as a work of record. In order to test this impression, I decided to examine a short neutral passage that would serve as a fair sample. The passage chosen for scrutiny had to be brief, and about an easily researched subject. The subject also had to be incapable of having stirred the prejudices of the biographer or the reviewer, or of awakening those of the readers of the book or review. Pages 28-31 of No Abiding City were selected because they dealt with a very minor military operation, viz. a Commando raid on Bardia, and with a humdrum article Waugh wrote about it. No issue of class, religion, politics, literary theory or internal military squabbling arises. Nor does the spectre of professional rivalry, for no one, I imagine, seeks the bubble reputation in a war of words about Bardia. The three pages narrate the events of the raid, using information drawn from Waugh's article and diaries. In addition, criticisms are made of Waugh on the basis of real and purported discrepancies between the article and the diaries. Little is said about the genesis of the article or about the administrative difficulties attending its publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Hilary Mantel Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8gm8d1h No online items Hilary Mantel Papers Finding aid prepared by Natalie Russell, October 12, 2007 and Gayle Richardson, January 10, 2018. The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © October 2007 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Hilary Mantel Papers mssMN 1-3264 1 Overview of the Collection Title: Hilary Mantel Papers Dates (inclusive): 1980-2016 Collection Number: mssMN 1-3264 Creator: Mantel, Hilary, 1952-. Extent: 11,305 pieces; 132 boxes. Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: The collection is comprised primarily of the manuscripts and correspondence of British novelist Hilary Mantel (1952-). Manuscripts include short stories, lectures, interviews, scripts, radio plays, articles and reviews, as well as various drafts and notes for Mantel's novels; also included: photographs, audio materials and ephemera. Language: English. Access Hilary Mantel’s diaries are sealed for her lifetime. The collection is open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information, contact Reader Services. Publication Rights The Huntington Library does not require that researchers request permission to quote from or publish images of this material, nor does it charge fees for such activities. The responsibility for identifying the copyright holder, if there is one, and obtaining necessary permissions rests with the researcher.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (4MB)
    Evelyn Waugh in his library at Piers Court In 1950. This photograph by Douglas Glass appeared in "Portrait Gallery" ln the Sunday T;m~s, January 7, 1951. Waugh had recently published Hel~nQ (1950), and he was about to start writing M~n at Arms (1952), the first volume of the trilogy that became Sword o/Honour (1965). C J. C. C. Glass "A Handful of Mischief" New Essays on Evelyn Waugh Edited by Donat Gallagher, Ann Pasternak Slater, and John Howard Wilson Madison· Teaneck Fairleigh Dickinson University Press Published by Fairleigh Dickinson University Press Co-publisbed with The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 www.rlpgbooks.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Copyright C 2011 by The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or me<:hanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data on file under LC#2010016424 ISBN: 978-1-61147-048-2 (d. : alk. paper) eISBN: 978-1-61147-049-9 e"" The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences- Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSIINISO Z39.48-1992. Printed in the United States of America To Alexander Waugh, who keeps the show on the road Contents Acknowledgments 9 Abbreviations 11 Introduction ROBERT MURRAY DAVIS 13 Evelyn Waugh, Bookman RICHARD W.
    [Show full text]
  • EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER and STUDIES Vol
    EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUDIES Vol EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUDIES Vol. 33, No. 3 Winter 2003 Wights Errant: Suffixal Sound Symbolism in the Novels of Evelyn Waugh by Simon Whitechapel He who hesitates is lost. Particularly in the novels of Evelyn Waugh, where little serves to damn a character as readily as hesitation and uncertainty. In the prologue to Brideshead Revisited (1945), for example, Charles Ryder accompanies his C.O. on an inspection of the camp: ‘Look at that,’ said the commanding officer. ‘Fine impression that gives to the regiment taking over from us.’ ‘That’s bad,’ I said. ‘It’s a disgrace. See that everything there is burned before you leave camp.’ ‘Very good, sir. Sergeant-major, send over to the carrier-platoon and tell Captain Brown that the C.O. wants this ditch cleared up.’ I wondered whether the colonel would take this rebuff; so did he. He stood irresolutely prodding the muck in the ditch, then he turned on his heel and strode away.1 The C.O. is never named, perhaps because Waugh had already bestowed his favorite suffix of contempt on another character in the prologue, Hooper, who accordingly joins Beaver, Trimmer, Atwater, Dr Messinger, Mulcaster, Corker, Salter, Lord Copper, Peter Pastmaster, Box-Bender, Pennyfeather, and Ryder among what might be called Waugh’s wights errant. The last two characters, who are partly autobiographical, prove that Waugh did not spare himself: Paul Pennyfeather, the hero of Decline and Fall (1928), suffers misfortune after misfortune because he is too trusting and unassertive, and Charles Ryder, the narrator of Brideshead, though perhaps partly shielded by his patrician “y”, is still worthy of serious blame for his behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Marston Lafrance SWORD of HONOUR
    Marston LaFrance SWORD OF HONOUR: THE IRONIST PLACATUS Sword of Honour offers plenty of critical problems quite sufficient unto themselves, but they are further complicated by the mere fact of the trilogy's place in the canon. Because it comes at the end of Waugh's long career the reader is bound to be influenced, more or less unavoidably, by his general view of the earlier work, by his overall conception of an author whom he has enjoyed- or resented- for almost four decades. At least three such general views seem to have emerged over the years, and a brief look at them will suggest that a fourth might prove useful. Those readers who consider Waugh "essentially a comedian", 1 for example, should find Men at Arms the most attractive part of the trilogy, and thus it should surprise no one that this book, the least important of the three, has been called "the best of Waugh's novels".2 Readers convinced that Waugh is the twentieth century's archetypal snob, and prejudiced champion of a defunct aristocracy, must find Officers and Gentlemen impossible and parts of Unconditional Surrend er difficult to accept. Those who view him as primarily a disgruntled Tory satirist- probably the majority, and the best of the lot- will find abundant grist for their aesthetic mills throughout the trilogy, but they will also encounter solid blocks of material which their machinery canno t easily accommodate. There is nothing conspicuously satiric about the relationship between Guy and his father,3 about the deaths of Gervase and lvo, Tony Box-Bender's becoming a monk, Guy's betrayal by Virgini a, Guy's devotion to the ideal represented by Sir Roger of Waybroke, Guy's escape from Crete, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Books and Articles by Evelyn Waugh Black Mischief (1930), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1938
    BIBLIOGRAPHY Books and articles by Evelyn Waugh Black Mischief (1930), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1938. Brideshead Revisited: The Sacred and Profane Memories of Captain Charles Ryder (1945), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1962. Decline and Fall (1928), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1937. Edmund Campion (1935), London: Cassell, 1987. A Little Learning, London: Chapman and Hall, 1964. Put Out More Flags (1942), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976. Scott-King’s Modern Europe, in Work Suspended and Other Stories (1947), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1982. The Sword of Honour Trilogy (1952, 1955, 1961), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984. Vile Bodies (1930), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1938. “Beau Brummells on £60 A Year”, Daily Express, 13 February 1929, 5. “Commando Raid on Bardia”, Life, 17 November 1941, 63-66, 71, 72, 74. “Failure of a Mission”, review of Miss Fire, by Jasper Rootham, The Tablet, 11 May 1946, 241. “Fan-Fare”, Life, 8 April 1946, 53, 54, 56, 58, 60. “Introduction”, to Christie Lawrence, Irregular Adventure, London: Faber and Faber, 1947, 11-13. “Marshal Tito’s Regime”, The Times, 23 May 1945, 5. “Marshal Tito’s Regime”, The Times, 5 June 1945, 5 [both under the pseudonym “A British Soldier Lately in Yugoslavia”]. “Marshal Tito’s Visit”, Spectator, 19 December 1952, 846. “Marshal Tito’s Visit”, Sunday Times, 1 February 1953, 6. “Mr Waugh Replies”, Sunday Express, 14 December 1952, 3. “Our Guest of Dishonour”, Sunday Express, 30 November 1952, 2. “President Tito’s Visit”, The Times, 24 March 1953, 9. “A Self-Made Myth”, review of Tito Speaks: His Self Portrait and Struggle with Stalin by Vladimir Dedijer, The Month NS 9 (April 1953), 240-45. 332 In the Picture “Tito and Stepinac”, New Statesman and Nation, 31 January 1953, 122.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannibals and Catholics: Reading the Reading of Evelyn Waugh
    Cannibals and Catholics: Reading the Reading of Evelyn Waugh’s Black Mischief Jonathan Greenberg I Evelyn Waugh, even more than Wyndham Lewis, is probably the most enduring satirist among British modernists, even though he rejected both labels for his own work.1 Yet while Lewis’s reputation has undergone a triumphant rehabilitation in recent decades, Waugh still suffers from the preconception that his work is minor. Symptomatically, Fredric Jameson’s Fables of Aggression, a book in part responsible for Lewis’s soaring reputation, initiated its restorative project in 1978 precisely at Waugh’s expense: “At best, in Britain today, [Lewis] retains a kind of national celebrity and is read as a more scandalous and explosive Waugh.”2 In other words, Waugh is merely a less scandalous and explosive version of Lewis – a less scandalous and explosive version, moreover, of the “old,” misread, unreconstructed Lewis, of Lewis the eccentric gadfly rather than of Lewis the radical innovator and analyst of modernity who emerges in Jameson’s compelling, if feverish, study. Perhaps because his jokes are funnier than Lewis’s, his prose more burnished, and his extra-fictional writing less theoretically challenging, Waugh has yet to find a Jameson to champion his work and bring him into wider accounts of modernism.3 Located between the high and the low, he fits awkwardly into a narrative of the modernist “great divide”; conservative but not extremist, his politics, unlike those of Lewis or Marinetti, have rarely proved interesting to dialecticians.4 But it is precisely as a satirist, I maintain, that Waugh is important to accounts of modernism.
    [Show full text]