DOCSLIB.ORG

United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Case 3:11-cv-00202-KRG Document 1 Filed 09/08/11 Page 1 of 154 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF CIVIL ACTION NO.: LLOYD’S SYNDICATE 3500 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA, THE SAUDI HIGH COMMISSION FOR RELIEF OF BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA, SAUDI JOINT RELIEF COMMITTEE FOR KOSOVO AND CHECHNYA, SAUDI RED CRESCENT SOCIETY, NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK, AL RAJHI BANKING AND INVESTMENT COMPANY, PRINCE SALMAN BIN ABDUL AZIZ AL SAUD, SULEIMAN ABDEL AZIZ AL RAJHI, YASSIN AL QADI Defendants. THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Underwriting Members of Lloyd’s Syndicate 3500, in its own right and as successor in interest to Lloyd’s Syndicate 271, is a United Kingdom based insurance syndicate with a principal place of business located at 161-163 Preston Road, Brighton, England. 2. Defendant Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a foreign state within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §1603(a). Saudi Arabia maintains an Embassy within the United States at 601 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. 3. Defendant Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina (“Saudi High Commission” or “SHC”) is a controlled agent and alter-ego of the government of Saudi Arabia. Although the Saudi High Commission has its headquarters in the Kingdom, its operations are conducted primarily outside of Saudi Arabia. Case 3:11-cv-00202-KRG Document 1 Filed 09/08/11 Page 2 of 154 4. Defendant Saudi Joint Relief Committee for Kosovo and Chechnya (“SJRC”) is a controlled agent and alter-ego of the government of Saudi Arabia. Although the SJRC has its headquarters in the Kingdom, its operations are conducted primarily outside of Saudi Arabia. 5. Defendant Saudi Red Crescent Society (“SRC”) is a controlled agent and alter- ego of the government of Saudi Arabia. Although the SRC has its headquarters in the Kingdom, its operations are conducted primarily outside of Saudi Arabia. 6. Defendant National Commercial Bank (“NCB”) is a Saudi-based international financial institution, with a principal place of business located at King Abdul Aziz Street, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. NCB maintains operations throughout the World, providing a broad range of financial services, including Shariah compliant finance products and services, to individual and institutional clients. 7. Defendant al Rajhi Bank (“al Rajhi Bank”), formerly known as al Rajhi Banking and Investment Company, (“al Rajhi Bank”) is a Saudi-based international financial institution, with a principal place of business located at Olaya Street, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Al Rajhi Bank maintains operations throughout the World, providing a broad range of financial services, including Shariah compliant finance products and services, to individual and institutional clients. 8. Defendant Prince Salman bin Abdul Aziz al Saud (“Prince Salman”) is a resident of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and at times material hereto headed the SHC. 9. Defendant Suleiman Abdel Aziz al Rajhi is a citizen and resident of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and at times material hereto was the CEO of al Rajhi Bank, founder of the Saar Foundation, and an officer of the International Islamic Relief Organization. 2 Case 3:11-cv-00202-KRG Document 1 Filed 09/08/11 Page 3 of 154 10. Defendant Yassin al Qadi is a citizen and resident of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and at times material hereto was an agent of National Commercial Bank, employee of al Rajhi Bank, and the founder of the Muwaffaq Foundation. A. JURISDICTION 11. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2) (diversity), and 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Alien Tort Claims Act). 12. The jurisdiction of this Court over defendants Saudi Arabia, Saudi High Commission, Saudi Joint Relief Committee, Saudi Red Crescent, and National Commercial Bank is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1330, as the claims against those defendants fall within the exception to immunity set forth at 28 U.S.C. §1605(a)(5) (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act). 13. Venue in this district is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)(2) and 1391(f)(1), as a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims asserted herein occurred in this district. B. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 14. On September 11, 2001, nineteen members of the al Qaeda terrorist network, fifteen of whom were citizens of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, hijacked four commercial airliners, and used those planes as weapons in a coordinated terrorist attack upon the United States and its citizens (the “September 11th Attacks”). 15. The September 11th Attacks resulted in the tragic loss of several thousand lives, personal injuries to countless other persons, and property damage on a catastrophic scale, including the complete destruction of the World Trade Center Complex. 3 Case 3:11-cv-00202-KRG Document 1 Filed 09/08/11 Page 4 of 154 16. Following the September 11th Attacks, various persons injured as a result of the Attacks, including families of individuals killed in the Attacks and parties who suffered economic losses as a result of the Attacks, brought civil claims against certain airlines, airport authorities, security companies, airplane manufacturers and other parties, generally alleging that those defendants were in some way responsible for their September 11 injuries under unintentional tort theories (the 9/11 Aviation cases). 17. By Order dated July 24, 2002, as amended by an Order issued on November 1, 2002, all of the 9/11 Aviation cases were consolidated before the Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein, under the consolidated caption In Re September 11 Litigation, 21 MC 101 (the 9/11 Aviation Litigation). 18. By Order dated November 1, 2002, Judge Hellerstein prohibited the defendants in the 9/11 Aviation Litigation from joining as additional defendants any alleged terrorist or terrorist supporter, thereby precluding the defendants from asserting third-party claims in that litigation against those intentional tortfeasors. 19. After several years of pre-trial proceedings, the vast mority of the claims advanced in the 9/11 Litigation were resolved through a series of individual settlements. 20. At all times material hereto, plaintiff herein provided liability insurance coverage to one or more of the parties named as defendants in the 9/11 Aviation cases. 21. Pursuant to the terms of the applicable policies of insurance, plaintiff herein made payments on behalf of its liability insureds towards the settlements referenced above, in an amount in excess of $215,000,000.00. 4 Case 3:11-cv-00202-KRG Document 1 Filed 09/08/11 Page 5 of 154 22. Through the instant action, plaintiff seeks recovery of amounts paid on behalf of its insureds in settlement of the 9/11 Aviation cases, and amounts expended in relation to the defense of its insureds in the 9/11 Aviation Litigation, from parties who knowingly provided material support and resources to al Qaeda in the years leading up to the September 11th Attacks, and who by virtue of their intentional conduct bear primary responsibility for the injuries resulting from the September 11th Attacks. 23. As set forth above, the September 11th Attacks were carried out by the al Qaeda terrorist organization. Althought the Attacks represented a tragedy of historic proportions to America and its allies, the Attacks were, to al Qaeda and its adherents, simply a targeted operational strike carried out as part of a broader mission to wage jihad against the United States. 24. The success of al Qaeda’s agenda, including the September 11th Attacks themselves, has been made possible by the lavish sponsorship al Qaeda has received from its material sponsors and supporters over more than a decade leading up to September 11, 2001. 25. Each of the defendants named herein was a knowing and material participant in al Qaeda’s conspiracy to wage jihad against the United States, its nationals and allies. 26. The conspiracy among the defendants to wage jihad against the United States, its nationals and allies, included the provision of material support and resources to defendant al Qaeda and affiliated terrorist organizations, persons, and entities, as discussed herein. 27. Absent the sponsorship of al Qaeda’s material sponsors and supporters, including the defendants named herein, al Qaeda would not have possessed the capacity to conceive, plan and execute the September 11th Attacks. C. THE ORIGINS OF AL QAEDA 5 Case 3:11-cv-00202-KRG Document 1 Filed 09/08/11 Page 6 of 154 28. Al Qaeda has its origins in the jihad against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, although the ideological foundation for the al Qaeda movement long pre-dates that conflict. 29. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan served as a rallying point for Islamic extremists in the Middle East, who flocked to Afghanistan to wage jihad against the Soviet Union. 30. Osama bin Laden travelled to Afghanistan in 1980 to participate in the jihad, and gained prominence during this period for his role in establishing the financial and logistical infrastructure that sustained the Arab-Afghan fighters, commonly referred to as the mujahideen. According to the Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (the 9/11 Commission): Bin Ladin understood better than most of the volunteers the extent to which the continuation and eventual success of the jihad in Afghanistan depended on an increasingly complex, almost world- wide organization. This organization included a financial support network that came to be known as the “the Golden Chain,” put together mainly by financiers in Saudi Arabia and Persian Gulf states. Donations flowed through charities and other non- governmental organizations (NGOs). Bin Ladin and the “Afghan Arabs” drew largely on funds raised by this network, whose agents roamed world markets to buy arms and supplies for the mujahideen or “holy warriors.” 31.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chronology of Public Information Relating to the Cases of Messrs. Almalki, El Maati and Nureddin April 11, 2007
    Chronology of public information relating to the cases of Messrs. Almalki, El Maati and Nureddin April 11, 2007 Researched and written by Kerry Pither for organizations with Intervenor Status at the Internal Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Abdullah Almalki, Ahmad Abou El Maati and Muayyed Nureddin1 1 Amnesty International, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, Canadian Arab Federation, Canadian Council on American Islamic Relations, Canadian Muslim Civil Liberties Association, International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group. Chronology of public information relating to the cases of Messrs. Almalki, El Maati and Nureddin The following timeline draws on information in the public domain: the Arar Commission Report released on September 18, 2006; public evidence presented at the Arar Commission; the Report of Professor Stephen J. Toope, Fact Finder, October 14, 2005; publicly accessible court documents; information in the media; and the public chronologies, biographies and other documents filed by Messrs. Arar, El Maati, Almalki and Nureddin as exhibits at the Arar Commission. Care has been taken to accurately record this information and it has been verified and corroborated where possible, however much of the information has not been entered as sworn testimony, or subjected to cross-examination. Please note that while care has been taken to consult and include a fulsome range of significant sources of information, this chronology is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of all information relevant to these cases. Because of privacy issues, some of those referred to in this chronology are described, but not named. Early summer 1998 Abdullah Almalki says his first encounter with any security agency was when CSIS agent Theresa Sullivan telephoned and asked if they could meet.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDF File
    S E C R E T / / NOFORN / / 20321104 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HEADQUARTERS, JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO U.S. NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA APO AE 09360 JTF-GTMO-CDR 4 November 2007 MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, United States Southern Command, 3511 NW 9lst Avenue, Miami, FL 33172. SUBJECT: Recommendation for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD) for Guantanamo Detainee, ISN US9TS-000168DP (S) JTF-GTMO Detainee Assessment 1. (S//NF) Personal Information: JDIMS/NDRC Reference Name: Muhammad Ibn Arfhan Shahin Aliases and Current/True Name: Adel Bin Ahmed Ibrahim Hkimi, Abdel Khalek, Abu Bilal al-Tunisi, Abu Hind al- Tunisi, Muhammad Bin Erfane Bin Chahine Place of Birth: Ben Arous, Tunisia (TS) Date of Birth: 27 March 1965 Citizenship: Tunisia Internment Serial Number (ISN): US9TS-000168DP 2. (U//FOUO) Health: Detainee is in overall good health. 3. (S//NF) JTF-GTMO Assessment: a. (S) Recommendation: JTF-GTMO recommends this detainee for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD). JTF-GTMO previously recommended detainee for Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD) on 11 August 2006. b. (S//NF) Executive Summary: Detainee is assessed to be a senior member of the Global Jihadist Support Network (GJSN) with specific membership in the Tunisian Combat Group (TCG) and the Armed Islamic Group (GIA).1 Detainee is a veteran terrorist with a proven 1 The GJSN is a National Intelligence Priority Framework (NIPF) Priority 1A counter terrorism (CT) target. Priority 1A targets are defined as terrorist groups, countries that sponsor terrorism, or countries that have state organizations involved in terrorism that pose a clear and immediate danger to US persons or interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Bibliography (From Sheikhs to Sultanism)
    FULL BIBLIOGRAPHY (FROM SHEIKHS TO SULTANISM) Academic sources (books, chapters, and journal articles) P. Aarts and C. Roelants, Saudi Arabia: A Kingdom in Peril (London: Hurst & Co., 2015) A. Abdulla, The Gulf Moment in Contemporary Arab History (Beirut: Dar Al-Farabi, 2018) [in Arabic] I. Abed and P. Hellyer (eds.), United Arab Emirates: A New Perspective (Dubai: Trident, 2001) P. Abel and S. Horák, ‘A tale of two presidents: personality cult and symbolic nation-building in Turkmenistan’ in Nationalities Papers, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2015 A. Abrahams and A. Leber, ‘Framing a murder: Twitter influencers and the Jamal Khashoggi incident' in Mediterranean Politics [April 2020 online first view] D. Acemoglu, T. Verdier, and J. Robinson, ‘Kleptocracy and Divide-and-Rule: A Model of Personal Rule’ in Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 2, Nos. 2-3, 2004 G. Achcar, The People Want: A Radical Exploration of the Arab Uprising (London: Saqi, 2013) A. Adib-Moghaddam (ed.), A Critical Introduction to Khomeini (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014) I. Ahyat, ‘Politics and Economy of Banjarmasin Sultanate in the Period of Expansion of the Netherlands East Indies Government in Indonesia, 1826-1860’ in Tawarikh: International Journal for Historical Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2012 A. Al-Affendi, ‘A Trans-Islamic Revolution?’, Critical Muslim, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012 M. Al-Atawneh, ‘Is Saudi Arabia a Theocracy? Religion and Governance in Contemporary Saudi Arabia’ in Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 45, No. 5, 2009 H. Albrecht and O. Schlumberger, ‘Waiting for Godot: Regime Change Without Democratization in the Middle East’ in International Political Science Review, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The BCCI Affair
    The BCCI Affair A Report to the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate by Senator John Kerry and Senator Hank Brown December 1992 102d Congress 2d Session Senate Print 102-140 This December 1992 document is the penultimate draft of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee report on the BCCI Affair. After it was released by the Committee, Sen. Hank Brown, reportedly acting at the behest of Henry Kissinger, pressed for the deletion of a few passages, particularly in Chapter 20 on "BCCI and Kissinger Associates." As a result, the final hardcopy version of the report, as published by the Government Printing Office, differs slightly from the Committee's softcopy version presented below. - Steven Aftergood Federation of American Scientists This report was originally made available on the website of the Federation of American Scientists. This version was compiled in PDF format by Public Intelligence. Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF INVESTIGATION ............................................................................... 21 THE ORIGIN AND EARLY YEARS OF BCCI .................................................................................................... 25 BCCI'S CRIMINALITY .................................................................................................................................. 49 BCCI'S RELATIONSHIP WITH FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS CENTRAL BANKS, AND INTERNATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Muhammad Succeeded Individuals and Clans—With a New As a Prophet Is Undeniable; a I Command Structure
    G ABR L the traditional way of fighting—as hat Muhammad succeeded individuals and clans—with a new as a prophet is undeniable; a I command structure. He also relates E T prominent military historian now Muhammad’s masterful use of suggests that he might not have done so nonmilitary methods—bribery, alliance had he not also been a great soldier. building, and political assassination—to Best known as the founder of a major strengthen his long-term position, even religion, Muhammad was also a military at the expense of short-term military ISLA leader—Islam’s first great general. While considerations. MUHA there have been numerous accounts of Muhammad’s transformation of Arab Muhammad the Prophet, this is the first “To think of Muhammad as a military man will come as something of a new warfare enabled his successors to defeat M military biography of the man. experience to many. And yet Muhammad was truly a great general. He was the armies of Persia and Byzantium and ’ S F In Muhammad: Islam’s First Great General, establish the core of the Islamic empire— a military theorist, organizational reformer, strategic thinker, operational-level MUHA mm AD Richard A. Gabriel shows us a type of an accomplishment that, Gabriel argues, combat commander, political and military leader, heroic soldier, revolutionary, and I RST GREAT GENERAL warrior never before seen in antiquity—a would have been militarily impossible inventor of the theory of insurgency. It was Muhammad who forged the military leader of an all-new religious movement without Muhammad’s innovations. instrument of the Arab conquests that began within two years of his death by who in a single decade fought eight Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • An End Run Around the First Amendment: „Libel Tourists‟ Take Aim Overseas
    An End Run Around the First Amendment: „Libel Tourists‟ Take Aim Overseas By Ryan Feeney 2008 Pulliam Kilgore Intern Bruce W. Sanford Bruce D. Brown Laurie A. Babinski BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Washington, D.C. Counsel to the Society of Professional Journalists September 2008 In the throes of the American Civil Rights movement as Southern blacks flexed their political might against segregation, a city commissioner in Alabama sued the country‟s most prominent newspaper, The New York Times. L.B. Sullivan‟s libel suit sought to silence the implication of his critics that he was part of a racist Southern oligarchy responsible for the violent suppression of black protests in Montgomery. It failed, and an uniquely American brand of free speech was born. In deciding that landmark free-speech case, New York Times v. Sullivan, 1 the U.S. Supreme Court noted how libel suits such as Sullivan‟s threatened “the very existence of an American press virile enough to publish unpopular views on public affairs.” Throughout modern American history, linking a person to an unpopular group has often led to a rash of libel suits against the press. It happened with communism in the 1940s, organized crime in the 1970s, and homosexuality in the 1980s under the stigmatizing glare of the AIDS epidemic. Yet in the more than four decades since the New York Times decision, American libel plaintiffs have found it acutely difficult to muzzle the press. But these free speech protections apply only on American soil, which means they cannot be used against the latest wave of libel litigants who bring suits overseas – foreigners accused of terrorism ties.
    [Show full text]
  • Charkaoui and Bill C-3 Craig Forcese
    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 42 (2008) Article 12 A Bismarckian Moment: Charkaoui and Bill C-3 Craig Forcese Lorne Waldman Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Forcese, Craig and Waldman, Lorne. "A Bismarckian Moment: Charkaoui and Bill C-3." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 42. (2008). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol42/iss1/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. A Bismarckian Moment: Charkaoui and Bill C-3 Craig Forcese and Lorne Waldman* I. INTRODUCTION The German statesman Otto von Bismarck once said that “[i]f you like laws and sausages, you should never watch either one being made.”1 The recent enactment of Bill C-32 — the government’s response to the Supreme Court’s February 2007 decision in Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)3 — can best be described as a “Bismarckian moment”. An effort to remedy the core defects of the prior immigration security certificate regime, the new law cobbles together a potentially half-hearted “special advocate” regime and converts immigration law into a de facto system of indefinite limits on liberty for foreigners. The new system will generate an inevitable series of new constitutional challenges, some of which may succeed at the Supreme Court unless the deficiencies of Bill C-3 are cured by careful innovation at the Federal Court level.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Brief on Second Circuit Decision
    Case 1:03-md-01570-GBD-FM Document 2140 Filed 10/17/2008 Page 1 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) IN RE: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON ) Civil Action No. 03 MDL 1570 (GBD) SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 ) ) ) This document relates to: All Actions SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON SECOND CIRCUIT DECISION October 17, 2008 Case 1:03-md-01570-GBD-FM Document 2140 Filed 10/17/2008 Page 2 of 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY............................................................................................1 ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................................4 I. THE SECOND CIRCUIT’S DECISION COMPELS DISMISSAL OF ALL OFFICIAL-CAPACITY CLAIMS AGAINST REMAINING FSIA DEFENDANTS ...................................................................................................................4 A. The FSIA Protects Individuals Acting in Their Official Capacity ..........................5 B. The Two Remaining Saudi Entities Are “Agencies or Instrumentalities” of Saudi Arabia...........................................................................6 C. The FSIA’s Torts Exception Does Not Apply Here ................................................9 D. The Commercial Activities Exception to the FSIA Does Not Apply Here.............................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Dist~Ct of Columbia
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DIST~CT OF COLUMBIA BOUDELLAAL HAJJ, et al. Petitioners, Civil Action No. 04-CV-1166(RJL) GEORGEW. BUSH, Presidentof the UnitedStates, et al., Respondents. DECLARATIONOF JAMES R, CRISF1ELD JR. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, CommanderJames R. Crisfield Jr., Judge Advocate General’s Corps, United States Navy, hereby state that to the best of myknowledge, information and belief, the followingis tree, accurate and correct: 1. I am the Legal Advisor to the CombatantStatus ReviewTribunals. In that capacity I amthe principal legal advisor to the Director, CombatantStatus ReviewTribunals, and provide advice to Tribunals on legal, evidentiary, procedural, and other matters. I also reviewthe record of proceedingsin each Tribunal for legal sufficiency in accordancewith standards prescribed in the CombatantStatus ReviewTribunal establishment order and implementingdirective. 2. I hereby certify that the documentsattached hereto constitute a tree and accurate copy of the portions of the record of proceedings before the CombatantStatus ReviewTribunal related to petitioner BoudellaAI Hajj that are suitable for public release. Theportions of the record that are classified or consideredtaw enforcementsensitive are not attached hereto. I have redacted information that wouldpersonally identify other detainees and the family membersof detainees, as well as certain U.S. Governmentpersonnel in order to protect the personal security of those 5069 individuals. I have also redacted internee serial numbersbecause certain
    [Show full text]
  • Origination, Organization, and Prevention: Saudi Arabia, Terrorist Financing and the War on Terror”
    Testimony of Steven Emerson with Jonathan Levin Before the United States Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs “Terrorism Financing: Origination, Organization, and Prevention: Saudi Arabia, Terrorist Financing and the War on Terror” July 31, 2003 Steven Emerson Executive Director The Investigative Project 5505 Conn. Ave NW #341 Washington DC 20015 Email: [email protected] phone 202-363-8602 fax 202 966 5191 Introduction Terrorism depends upon the presence of three primary ingredients: Indoctrination, recruitment and financing. Take away any one of those three ingredients and the chances for success are geometrically reduced. In the nearly two years since the horrific attacks of 9/11, the war on terrorism has been assiduously fought by the US military, intelligence and law enforcement. Besides destroying the base that Al Qaeda used in Afghanistan, the United States has conducted a comprehensive campaign in the United States to arrest, prosecute, deport or jail those suspected of being connected to terrorist cells. The successful prosecution of terrorist cells in Detroit and Buffalo and the announcement of indictments against suspected terrorist cells in Portland, Seattle, northern Virginia, Chicago, Tampa, Brooklyn, and elsewhere have demonstrated the resolve of those on the front line in the battle against terrorism. Dozens of groups, financial conduits and financiers have seen their assets frozen or have been classified as terrorist by the US Government. One of the most sensitive areas of investigation remains the role played by financial entities and non-governmental organizations (ngo’s) connected to or operating under the aegis of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Since the July 24 release of the “Report of the Joint Inquiry into the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001,” the question of what role Saudi Arabia has played in supporting terrorism, particularly Al Qaeda and the 9/11 attacks, has come under increasing scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Al Qaeda Finances and Funding to Affiliated Groups
    Al Qaeda Finances and Funding to Affiliated Groups Strategic Insights, Volume IV, Issue 1 (January 2005) by Victor Comras Strategic Insights is a monthly electronic journal produced by the Center for Contemporary Conflict at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. The views expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of NPS, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. For a PDF version of this article, click here. This paper provides a case study of al Qaeda finances and funding to affiliated groups. It is based in large part on my observations and experience as one of five international monitors charged by the UN Security Council to oversee the effectiveness of the measures adopted by the Security Council against al Qaeda and the Taliban. Some of the material in this paper is drawn directly from the five reports our monitoring group made to the Security Council during my tenure.. Considerable mystery and intrigue still surrounds the al Qaeda terrorist network and its sources of funding. We know more today than we did three years ago about its financial tools and structure, but we still have not identified much of its sources of supply and funding. And much of what we know may only be conjecture. The CIA has estimated, for example, that it cost Al Qaeda’ some $30 million a year to sustain itself during the period preceding 9/11, but the agency is still not sure what al Qaeda needs or expends today. And we still do not know with any precision just how much, and from whom, al Qaeda raises its money, or how it allocates it.[1] The roots of al Qaeda’s financial network, we believe, trace back directly to the extensive recruitment and financing networks established to support anti-Soviet jihad activities in Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraordinary Rendition« Flights, Torture and Accountability – a European Approach Edited By: European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights E.V
    WITH A PREFACE BY MANFRED NOWAK (UNITED NATIONS SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON TORTURE) 1 SECOND EDITION 2 3 CIA- »EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION« FLIGHTS, TORTURE AND ACCOUNTABILITY – A EUROPEAN APPROACH EDITED BY: EUROPEAN CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS E.V. (ECCHR) SECOND EDITION 4 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 09 PREFACE by Manfred Nowak, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture © by European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights e.V. (ECCHR) 13 JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN EUROPE – DISCUSSING Second Edition, Originally published in March 2008 STRATEGIES by Wolfgang Kaleck, ECCHR This booklet is available through the ECCHR at a service charge of 6 EUR + shipping. Please contact [email protected] for more information. 27 THE U.S. PROGRAM OF EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION AND SECRET DETENTION: PAST AND FUTURE Printed in Germany, January 2009 by Margaret Satterthwaite, New York University All rights reserved. 59 PENDING INVESTIGATION AND COURT CASES ISBN 978-3-00-026794-9 by Denise Bentele, Kamil Majchrzak and Georgios Sotiriadis, ECCHR European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) I. The Freedom of Information Cases (USA/Europe) Greifswalder Strasse 4, D-10405 Berlin 59 FOIA Cases in the U.S. Phone: + 49 - (0) 30 - 40 04 85 90 / 40 04 85 91 62 Freedom of Information Cases in Eastern Europe Fax: + 49 - (0) 30 - 40 04 85 92 Mail: [email protected], Web: www.ECCHR.eu II. The Criminal Cases Council: Michael Ratner, Lotte Leicht, Christian Bommarius, Dieter Hummel 68 The Case of Ahmed Agiza and Mohammed Al Zery (Sweden) Secretary General: Wolfgang
    [Show full text]