DOCSLIB.ORG

R.Harte Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
R.Harte Dissertation UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Poetic Philosophy in Plato and Zhuangzi Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/10m115xg Author Harte, Ryan Publication Date 2020 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Poetic Philosophy in Plato and Zhuangzi A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature by Ryan J. Harte June 2020 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Lisa Raphals, Chairperson Dr. Perry Link Dr. Yang Ye Dr. Zina Giannopoulou Copyright by Ryan J. Harte 2020 The Dissertation of Ryan J. Harte is approved: ——————————————————————————— ——————————————————————————— ——————————————————————————— ——————————————————————————— Committee Chairperson ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I’ve always liked this remark from Cornel West: “I am who I am because somebody loved me.” It would be impractical to list everyone whose love in one way or another sustained me throughout my academic trip thus far, but a few names deserve outstanding mention: Kathleen (“mom”) for everything, Aunt Julie for getting all “verklempt” when I got into college, Tim for actually choosing to be my brother, Carly for seeing me and being seen, Sean for the sustenance of true friendship and the scraping heart-to-hearts, Wing for lung-fulls of fresh air when I needed them early on, and Ariel for the love and the generosity and the desert—in other words, for making southern California not only bearable but sometimes beautiful. The first question my supervisor, Lisa Raphals, asked upon meeting me in-person was whether I had food in my fridge and an acceptable place to sleep. My endless thanks to her for recognizing that there is a whole person attached to the scholar. Graduate students talk, and so I am keenly aware of my good fortune in having an advisor with whom I can openly disagree, caustically joke, and enjoy a meal (usually generously cooked by her). I am so glad my expansive search years ago turned me on to her. I write a lot about form, and she has been formative. Perry Link asks the best questions I have ever received. He can seize on a single word in a way that forces me to reëvaluate my entire argument, and this puts me on thrillingly precarious ground whenever I speak with him. I deeply admire his integrity in speaking his mind across all contexts, and his thoughtfulness towards equity in the case of graduate students and non-tenured faculty. Finally, I am grateful for his sheer sense of fun when getting into the nitty gritty of an argument. I thank him for the all the dinner invitations. iv I am indebted to the generosity of Yang Ye, whose pure delight in the beauty of literature and language is something the academic humanities need more of. He has always been ready to share feedback on my half-baked essays and ideas, always willing to sit and comb through the details of a text, but also to just visit and get to know me. In particular, his willingness to guide me through Classical Chinese was indefatigable. Having been his TA for several years, I can say that his love of fine literature is infectious: undergraduates sense it, and I have learned much from him. His encouragement to flex my creative muscles in the dissertation was welcome—any disastrous results are my own fault. Zina Giannopoulou has my thanks for hopping aboard an untested vessel when she agreed to serve on my prospectus committee only on the basis of our getting along well at a lunch. As a student, I felt affectionately seen when she correctly observed that I am a person who thinks as I write. Her candor and enthusiasm have been appreciated not just as a student but as a person (driving to Riverside from LA for drinks with a relative stranger is a kindness I have yet to fully fathom, let alone repay). Alba Curry, who, in Tennyson’s words, has “toil'd, and wrought, and thought with me,” deserves my undying thanks. We are very different thinkers, but we make each other better. I am always happy to be angry on her behalf, and I am very sorry for leaving her alone in Riverside. Thomas Sorensen has listened to this entire dissertation. “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” I love his generosity, among much else. v This dissertation is dedicated to the memory of Herman Sinaiko. He taught me how to read. vi ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Poetic Philosophy in Plato and Zhuangzi by Ryan J. Harte Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program Comparative Literature University of California, Riverside, June 2020 Dr. Lisa Raphals, Chairperson This dissertation argues that written form is essential, not accessory, to philosophical content, with particular focus on Plato and Zhuangzi. In the case of these two thinkers, the written forms they have left us are what I call poetic: full of metaphor, imagery, narrative, and so on—characterized in largely by a lack of systematic analysis. Attending to form thus entails (1) expanding our notion of what counts as philosophically meaningful and (2) radically different interpretations of what Plato and Zhuangzi are up to—i.e., reading their forms as inherently meaningful rather than as containers for preconceived notions of Platonism or Daoism. The dissertation speaks, hopefully, to audiences in comparative literature, philosophy (especially the history of philosophy), classics, and sinology. vii CONTENTS Preface…………………………………………………………………………………….ix Chapter I Introduction: Forms & Poetic Philosophy…………………………………………………1 Chapter II The Torqued Unity of the Phaedrus………………………………………………………69 Chapter III Plato & Gestalt Thinking……………………………………………………………….134 Chapter IV Murdoch & Metaphysical Metaphors…………………………………………….…….166 Chapter V Perceiving & Selfing in the Qi wu lun 齊物論……………………………………….......215 Chapter VI Skillful Seeing in the Zhuangzi 莊⼦…………………………………………………...258 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….……..294 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………313 viii PREFACE ⼦曰：「予欲無⾔。」⼦貢曰：「⼦如不⾔，則⼩⼦何述焉︖」⼦曰：「天何⾔哉︖四時 ⾏焉，百物⽣焉，天何⾔哉︖」 Confucius said, “I desire to be wordless.” Zi Gong said, “But, master—if you don’t talk, then what will we disciples transmit?” Confucius said, “Does Heaven talk? Hmm? The four seasons come and go, everything springs up, but does Heaven ever talk?” Analects of Confucius, 論語 17.19 This dissertation argues that written form is essential, not accessory, to philosophical content, with particular focus on Plato and Zhuangzi. My starting premise is that form is an instantiation of ideas or content, not a container for them. When we attend to Plato’s and Zhuangzi’s forms, we come away with a different Plato and Zhuangzi than we are used to. I propose what I call poetic philosophy in contrast to most modern professional philosophy. By “poetic” here I refer to Aristotle’s sense of “poetics”: an interest in how a text does what it does rather than in what a text means. “Stylistics” or “formalism” capture somewhat of what I mean. I have opted for “poetic philosophy” because I want the resonance of that word: poetic, poiēsis (“to make, fabricate”). I also want to challenge our distinctions between poetry and philosophy, and so any discomfort that “poetic philosophy” evokes is probably deliberate. I rely on a broad notion of “form,” including written style but extending to the large idea that seeing how some form hang together is the fundamental experience of meaning itself. Here I draw on the largely neglected field of gestalt theory, which has in recent years benefitted from much experimental research, and which helps me treat form itself as a comparative category. ix Chapter One will give an overview of my theoretical approach, my poetic philosophy, as well as briefly look at how this approach differs from typical approaches to Plato and Zhuangzi. Chapter Two is a poetic reading of Plato’s Phaedrus with special attention to (1) its torqued unity as a poetic text and (2) Plato’s intertextual use of lyric poets Stesichorus and Sappho. Chapter Three zooms out to discuss more general affinities between Platonic metaphysics and gestalt thought, including a poetic model of truth as a kind of coherence. Chapter Four builds on this model of truth and offers my theory of metaphor not as decoration but as a way of saying something true; I then apply that to argue for Plato’s Theory of the Forms as a poetic metaphor. Chapter Five turns to Zhuangzi and shows how many of the same themes from Plato (knowledge as perception rather than analysis, for example) show up in the Qi wu lun 齊物論. Chapter Six expands this discussion to several of the famous skill stories in the Zhuangzi, which not only show some of poetic philosophy’s basic tenants but also blur several dichotomies that commonly distort the text (e.g., theory versus practice, mind versus body). The Conclusion recaps the project and suggests a direction for future work. Finally, a brief note on the structure and division of the dissertation. By sheer happenstance, my suspicion that the form of a text should be primary in any interpretation arose in reading Plato long before I was ever exposed to early Chinese philosophy. I have had at least an extra decade’s worth of thinking about these issues in Plato than in Zhuangzi—which is not to say that I have just taken a problem in Plato and thrown it onto Zhuangzi. Indeed, one of my hopes is that this project as a whole makes an argument for form as a comparative category. My theories of metaphor and of truth x apply to both thinkers but get explained in the Plato half, which helps account for why there are more Plato chapters. That said, Plato was my philosophical first love, and there is not much use in trying to hide that fact here—even as I carry on a torrid love/hate affair with Zhuangzi.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Goosegoose
    TheThe GooseGoose ISSUE 4.1 SPRING 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITOR’S NOTEBOOK: PAUL HUEBENER NEWS FROM THE EXECUTIVE: RICHARD PICKARD EDGE EFFECTS: JAN ZWICKY REGIONAL FEATURE: LAKE MASSAWIPPI, QUÉBEC with an INTRODUCTION by FENN STEWART BOOK REVIEWS by ALANNA F. BONDAR; NICK BRADLEY; AFRA KAVANAGH; JENNIFER BOWERING DELISLE; SONNET L’ABBÉ; JOSÉ CARLOS REDONDO-OLMEDILLA; ROBYN READ; MARYANN MARTIN; JENNY KERBER; OWEN PERCY GRAD NETWORK: UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA NEW/UPCOMING PUBLICATIONS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS EDITOR’S NOTEBOOK With spring comes another issue of The Goose, and our contributors have provided some wonderful features. Richard Pickard gives an update about the ASLE 2009 conference in Victoria. In Edge Effect, Jan Zwicky offers three poems: “Small Song: Blue,” “Song for the breeze before dawn,” and “Small Song: December Light.” The Regional Feature puts the spotlight on Québec, where Fenn Stewart takes us under the surface of Lake Massawippi, and Tom Berryman reflects on Québec and ecocriticism. And the Grad Network highlights the University of Victoria’s West Coast Literature program. Book reviews in this issue present Alanna F. Bondar’s review of Don Domanksi’s and Tom Wayman’s latest poetry collections. Jenny Kerber reviews Other Selves: Animals in the Canadian Literary Imagination; Robyn Read reviews Tim Bowling’s memoir The Lost Coast; Nick Bradley reviews Dennis Lee’s YesNo, as well as the essay collection Coming into Contact: Explorations in Ecocritical Theory and Practice; José Carlos Redondo- Olmedilla reviews Intent for a Nation: What is Canada for? by Michael Byers; Sonnet L’Abbé reviews A Gathering of Flowers from Shakespeare by Gerard Brender à Brandis (with F.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence Cahoone Professor of Philosophy
    Lawrence Cahoone Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA 01610-2395 Smith517 (508)793-2460 [email protected] Department Phone/Fax:-2468/-3841 Education Ph.D. Philosophy, Stony Brook University, 1985. Dissertation: "The Dynamics of Subjectivism: A Philosophy of Modernity," directed by Edward Casey. B.A. Psychology and Philosophy double major, Clark University, 1976. Areas of Specialization (research and advanced courses): American Philosophy, Continental Philosophy, Social and Political Philosophy, Philosophy of Culture, Metaphysics and Natural Science, Modernism and Postmodernism Areas of Competence (introductory/intermediate courses): History of Western Philosophy, Ethics, Logic Books 1. The Orders of Nature. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2013. 2. Cultural Revolutions: Reason versus Culture in Philosophy, Politics, and Jihad. State College, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005. 3. From Modernism to Postmodernism: An Anthology. Expanded Second Edition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2003. (First Edition 1996) 4. Civil Society: The Conservative Meaning of Liberal Politics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2002. 5. The Ends of Philosophy: Pragmatism, Foundationalism, and Postmodernism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2002. (rpt. of The Ends of Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995). 6. The Dilemma of Modernity: Philosophy, Culture, and Anti-Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988. (Chinese translation: Commercial House, Beijing, 2008) Other Media 1. Modern Political Tradition: From Hobbes to Habermas, 36-lecture course on CD and DVD. The Great Courses. June 2014. 2. Wise Guys. A Philosophical Comedy. Heartland Plays Inc. 2014. www.heartlandplays.com 3. Modern Intellectual Tradition: From Descartes to Derrida, 36-lecture course on CD and DVD.
    [Show full text]
  • PLATO's SYMPOSIUM J
    50 ccn~ PLATO'S SYMPOSIUM j - - -- ________j e Library of Liberal Arts PLATO'S SYMPOSIUM Tran lated by BENJAMIN JOWETT With an Introduction by FULTON H. ANDERSON Professor of Philosophy, University of Toronto THE LIBERAL ARTS PRESS NEW YORK CONTENTS SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY .. .... ................................... ......... ... ........... 6 EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION ................... ............................................. 7 SYMPOSIUM APOLLODORUS 13 THE SPEECH OF PHAEDRUS ...... .......................... .......................... .. 19 THE SPEECH OF PAU ANIAS ................. ... ................................. ... .. 21 THE SPEECH OF ERYXIMACHUS 27 THE SPEECH OF ARISTOPHAN E .. ............................... .................. 30 THE SPEECH OF AGATHON ............ .............................................. .. 35 THE SPEECH OF SocRATES ................................ .. ................... ..... .. 39 THE SPEECH OF ALCIBIADES ................. ............... ... ........... ...... .... .. 55 8 PLATO INTROD CTION 9 crescendo, and culminates in the report by Socrates on wi dom and epistemology, upon all of which the Symposium ha bearing, learned from the "wi e" woman Diotima. are intertwined, we m ay set down briefly a few of the more general The dialogue i a "reported" one. Plato himself could not have principles which are to be found in it author's many-sided thought. been present at the original party. (What went on there was told The human soul, a cording to Plato, is es entially in motion. time and time again about Athens.) He was a mere boy when it It is li fe and the integration of living functions. A dead soul is a con­ took place. Nor could the narrator Apollodorus have been a guest; _lladiction in terms. Man throughout his whole nature is erotically he was too young at the time. The latter got his report from motivated. His "love" or desire i manifest in three mutually in­ Aristodemus, a guest at the banquet.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Freedom in Necessity Or in Happiness? Guo Xiang's and Lin Xiyi's Controversial Readings of Zhuangzi's »Free Rambling«
    Is Freedom in Necessity or in Happiness? Guo Xiang’s and Lin Xiyi’s Controversial Readings of Zhuangzi’s »Free Rambling« David Machek The opening of Zhuangzi 莊子1 is subject of a long and ongoing controversy in both Chinese and Western interpretive tradition.2 The most debated issue in this discussion is the nature of relationship between big things, as represented by a huge Peng bird, and small things, as embodied by a cicada and dove. This paper will work with two traditional Chinese commentaries on Zhuangzi that represent the earliest articulations of two opposing perspectives on this relationship, charting the battlefield for later interpreters.3 Since this study will confine itself solely to the commentaries on the first 1 As tradition has it, the author of Zhuangzi is the philosopher Zhuangzi who lived in the fourth century B.C. Today, scholars generally agree that the received and the only extant version of the text in the edition of Guo Xiang consists of several textual layers written in different times by different authors. For a detailed overview and discussion of the history of the text, see David Chai, Early Zhuangzi Commentaries (München: Verlag Dr. Müller, 2008). Nonetheless, the authorship of the first chapter is ascribed to Zhuangzi himself. 2 The most recent discussion of the controversy, as well as a critique of Guo Xiang’s reading was presented by Lian Xinda, »Zhuangzi the Poet: Re-Reading the Peng Bird Image«, Dao 8 (2009), 233– 254. The present study is much indebted to Lian Xinda’s article and endorses a great deal of his conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Skepticism and Pluralism Ways of Living a Life Of
    SKEPTICISM AND PLURALISM WAYS OF LIVING A LIFE OF AWARENESS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ZHUANGZI #±r A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY AUGUST 2004 By John Trowbridge Dissertation Committee: Roger T. Ames, Chairperson Tamara Albertini Chung-ying Cheng James E. Tiles David R. McCraw © Copyright 2004 by John Trowbridge iii Dedicated to my wife, Jill iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In completing this research, I would like to express my appreciation first and foremost to my wife, Jill, and our three children, James, Holly, and Henry for their support during this process. I would also like to express my gratitude to my entire dissertation committee for their insight and understanding ofthe topics at hand. Studying under Roger Ames has been a transformative experience. In particular, his commitment to taking the Chinese tradition on its own terms and avoiding the tendency among Western interpreters to overwrite traditional Chinese thought with the preoccupations ofWestern philosophy has enabled me to broaden my conception ofphilosophy itself. Roger's seminars on Confucianism and Daoism, and especially a seminar on writing a philosophical translation ofthe Zhongyong r:pJm (Achieving Equilibrium in the Everyday), have greatly influenced my own initial attempts to translate and interpret the seminal philosophical texts ofancient China. Tamara Albertini's expertise in ancient Greek philosophy was indispensable to this project, and a seminar I audited with her, comparing early Greek and ancient Chinese philosophy, was part ofthe inspiration for my choice ofresearch topic. I particularly valued the opportunity to study Daoism and the Yijing ~*~ with Chung-ying Cheng g\Gr:p~ and benefited greatly from his theory ofonto-cosmology as a means of understanding classical Chinese philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • L Rathnam Dissertation
    The Politics of Skepticism: Montaigne and Zhuangzi on Freedom, Toleration, and the Limits of Government by Lincoln Edward Ford Rathnam A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Lincoln Edward Ford Rathnam 2018 ii The Politics of Skepticism: Montaigne and Zhuangzi on Freedom, Toleration, and the Limits of Government Lincoln Rathnam Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science 2018 Abstract: Contemporary political discourse often centers on a shared set of normative commitments: freedom, toleration, and limited government. This dissertation examines the theoretical basis for these commitments, through a comparative study of two eminent skeptics: Michel de Montaigne and Zhuangzi. Both develop forms of skepticism that are rooted in analyses of the phenomena of diversity and disagreement. They contend that our inability to reach convergence on central philosophical questions demonstrates the fundamental limitations of human knowledge. I argue that both offer novel and powerful arguments connecting these skeptical epistemological theses with the relevant normative commitments. In particular, both take skepticism to advance human freedom, by clearing away obstacles to effective action. As beings who are raised within a particular community, we inevitably acquire certain habits that constrain the forms of thought and action open to us. Skepticism helps us to recognize the contingency of those forms. In the interpersonal realm, both writers contend that skepticism generates an attitude of toleration towards others who live differently. This is because it undermines the theoretical claims upon which most forms of intolerance are constructed. I defend this claim with reference to the various forms of intolerance that existed in each writer’s context, Warring States era China and France during the Wars of Religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Phi 260: History of Philosophy I Prof
    Phi 260: History of Philosophy I Prof. Brandon C. Look University of Kentucky Spring 2007 Plato’s Symposium Although we will be looking at the Symposium as work of philosophy, its literary qualities should not be ignored. It can easily be read as a Comedy in three acts (see below), with a prologue (the conversation between Apollodorus and his friend) and an epilogue (Alcibiades’ drunken, tragic (?) account of his love). Consider also the narrative complexity of the work. By the time we get to Diotima’s speech, we have the following levels of narration: Plato says that Apollodorus says that Aristodemus says that Socrates says that Diotima says…Why is there so much distance placed within the narration? Is it supposed to show us how far away the Truth lies? The six speeches given by the attendants can be group into three pairs: Phaedrus and Pausanias; Eryximachus and Aristophanes; and Agathon and Socrates. 1st speech: Phaedrus • There is no greater good for a young boy than a gentle lover, and for a lover a boy to love. • Consider Phaedrus’ suggestion regarding the nature of the relation between lover and beloved: “if a man in love is found doing something shameful… then nothing would give him more pain than being seen by the boy he loves. … If only we could have cities and armies of lovers…” (178d-179a) So, gays in the military would actually be a good thing, right? • Gods honor virtue most highly when it belongs to Love. (180b) 2nd speech: Pausanias • There are two kinds of love: Urania, or Heavenly Aphrodite, and Pandemos, or Common Aphrodite.
    [Show full text]
  • Poetry, Place, and Spiritual Practices by Katharine Bubel BA, Trinity
    Edge Effects: Poetry, Place, and Spiritual Practices by Katharine Bubel B.A., Trinity Western University, 2004 M.A., Trinity Western University, 2009 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English Katharine Bubel, 2018 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Edge Effects: Poetry, Place, and Spiritual Practices by Katharine Bubel B.A., Trinity Western University, 2004 M.A., Trinity Western University, 2009 Supervisory Committee Dr. Nicholas Bradley, Department of English Supervisor Dr. Magdalena Kay, Department of English Departmental Member Dr. Iain Higgins, Department of English Departmental Member Dr. Tim Lilburn, Department of Writing Outside Member iii Abstract "Edge Effects: Poetry, Place, and Spiritual Practices” focusses on the intersection of the environmental and religious imaginations in the work of five West Coast poets: Robinson Jeffers, Theodore Roethke, Robert Hass, Denise Levertov, and Jan Zwicky. My research examines the selected poems for their reimagination of the sacred perceived through attachments to particular places. For these writers, poetry is a constitutive practice, part of a way of life that includes desire for wise participation in the more-than-human community. Taking into account the poets’ critical reflections and historical-cultural contexts, along with a range of critical and philosophical sources, the poetry is examined as a discursive spiritual exercise. It is seen as conjoined with other focal practices of place, notably meditative walking and attentive looking and listening under the influence of ecospiritual eros.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato's Symposium: the Ethics of Desire
    Plato’s Symposium: The Ethics of Desire FRISBEE C. C. SHEFFIELD 1 Contents Introduction 1 1. Ero¯s and the Good Life 8 2. Socrates’ Speech: The Nature of Ero¯s 40 3. Socrates’ Speech: The Aim of Ero¯s 75 4. Socrates’ Speech: The Activity of Ero¯s 112 5. Socrates’ Speech: Concern for Others? 154 6. ‘Nothing to do with Human AVairs?’: Alcibiades’ Response to Socrates 183 7. Shadow Lovers: The Symposiasts and Socrates 207 Conclusion 225 Appendix : Socratic Psychology or Tripartition in the Symposium? 227 References 240 Index 249 Introduction In the Symposium Plato invites us to imagine the following scene: A pair of lovers are locked in an embrace and Hephaestus stands over them with his mending tools asking: ‘What is it that you human beings really want from each other?’ The lovers are puzzled, and he asks them again: ‘Is this your heart’s desire, for the two of you to become parts of the same whole, and never to separate, day or night? If that is your desire, I’d like to weld you together and join you into something whole, so that the two of you are made into one. Look at your love and see if this is what you desire: wouldn’t this be all that you want?’ No one, apparently, would think that mere sex is the reason each lover takes such deep joy in being with the other. The soul of each lover apparently longs for something else, but cannot say what it is. The beloved holds out the promise of something beyond itself, but that something lovers are unable to name.1 Hephaestus’ question is a pressing one.
    [Show full text]
  • Zwicky 2012: What Is Ineffable?
    International Studies in the Philosophy of Science ISSN: 0269-8595 (Print) 1469-9281 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cisp20 What Is Ineffable? Jan Zwicky To cite this article: Jan Zwicky (2012) What Is Ineffable?, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 26:2, 197-217, DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2012.703480 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2012.703480 Published online: 05 Oct 2012. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 332 View related articles Citing articles: 2 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cisp20 International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. 26, No. 2, June 2012, pp. 197–217 What Is Ineffable? Jan Zwicky In this essay, I argue, via a revision of Freud’s notions of primary and secondary process, that experiences of resonant form lie at the root of many serious ineffability claims. I suggest further that Western European culture’s resistance to the perception of resonant form underlies some of its present crises. Is there anything that is genuinely ineffable? If so, how is it possible to think about it or to understand it? It is fashionable in some philosophical circles to express impatience with these ques- tions. The word ‘ineffable’, some will urge, is itself a predicate—one that obviously cannot be predicated of anything on pain of self-contradiction.1 Others, content to dismiss the paradox as a minor metalinguistic knot, nonetheless assert
    [Show full text]
  • Magical Practice in the Latin West Religions in the Graeco-Roman World
    Magical Practice in the Latin West Religions in the Graeco-Roman World Editors H.S. Versnel D. Frankfurter J. Hahn VOLUME 168 Magical Practice in the Latin West Papers from the International Conference held at the University of Zaragoza 30 Sept.–1 Oct. 2005 Edited by Richard L. Gordon and Francisco Marco Simón LEIDEN • BOSTON 2010 Th is book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Magical practice in the Latin West : papers from the international conference held at the University of Zaragoza, 30 Sept.–1 Oct. 2005 / edited by Richard L. Gordon and Francisco Marco Simon. p. cm. — (Religions in the Graeco-Roman world, ISSN 0927-7633 ; v. 168) Includes indexes. ISBN 978-90-04-17904-2 (hardback : alk. paper) 1. Magic—Europe—History— Congresses. I. Gordon, R. L. (Richard Lindsay) II. Marco Simón, Francisco. III. Title. IV. Series. BF1591.M3444 2010 133.4’3094—dc22 2009041611 ISSN 0927-7633 ISBN 978 90 04 17904 2 Copyright 2010 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, Th e Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to Th e Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of Zhuangzi and the Commentatorial Tradition of Guo Xiang
    THE PHILOSOPHY OF ZHUANGZI AND THE COMMENTATORIAL TRADITION OF GUO XIANG Desislava Damyanova Guo Xiang (also known as Kuo Hsiang or Zixuan) is the author of the most important commentary on Zhuangzi – one of the classical Daoist texts.1 He is also known as the person who implemented the current arrangement of thirty-three chapters divided into inner, outer and miscellaneous sections. Although Guo’s initial aim might have been to elucidate the ideas in the original text, his commentary on Zhuangzi represents a substantial philosophical achievement compared to the core text. It contains many original ideas and we shall examine the textual issues on which he is commenting in a try to get a deeper insight into their meaning. Guo Xiang2 practiced his philosophical pursuits this way – within the framework of the Daoist classic – and his manner has served as a blueprint for the later Neo-Confucian synthesis of the Chinese thought. 1 There is some controversy in the recent years over the true authorship of Guo’s commentary - the earliest source, the Jin Shu (Standard History of the Jin Dynasty), accuses Guo Xiang of plagiarizing all but two chapters of the commentary from Xiang Xiu (d. 300 CE, writing a generation earlier). “Current scholarship, while acknowledging that Guo made use of Xiang Xiu’s work and other earlier commentaries, still credits Guo as the principal author. The evidence for this recognition falls into three main areas. Firstly, the most innovative philosophical features in the commentary do not correspond with those in other works by Xiang Xiu. Secondly, in the early twentieth century, a postface to the commentary was discovered which details the work Guo carried out and finally, various linguistic analyses and references in other works suggest that Guo is the principal author.” <http://www.iep.utm.edu/guoxiang/>10.10.2012 2 Actually very little is known about the life of Guo Xiang: he lived in a time of great political upheaval and his own career was one of consistent and significant success.
    [Show full text]