Current Understandings and Future Perspectives for Research of Icy Moons
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Current understandings and future perspectives for research of icy moons Jun Kimura Osaka University Is there a life elsewhere in the universe? Pursuing this question is a fundamental part for human beings, and a clue to the answer of this question may be found on the icy moons around giant planets. After magnificent achievements of the Cassini, Galileo and Voyager spacecraft missions, the existence of a thick liquid water layer underneath solid ice crusts with various icy tectonic features has been inferred for several icy moons. Such liquid layers are now understood as subsurface oceans. To date, the evidence for oceans is not fully conclusive and mainly based on electro-magnetic induction signals, surface morphology and thermal modeling. In addition, hydrated salts on surface and water pluming including non-water volatiles and organics support to exist the subsurface ocean and the environment to emerge and sustain life there. In the following, I review our current knowledge for the icy moons in terms of interior, surface tectonics, chemical composition and habitability, and also present possible science research targets and exploration missions in future. On each giant planet system, only one or two explorations have been performed to date. No spacecraft explorations orbiting icy moons have not yet been achieved and there are still many big issues to be solved for direct investigation of extra-terrestrial life. ⽔星 惑星・準惑星・ (直径150km以上の) 衛星 ⾦星 地球系 ⽕星系 ⽊星系 ⼟星系 天王星系 海王星系 カイパーベルト Pluto Amalthea Janus 衛星研究の現状と将来展望 Eris Haumea Makemake Larissa 5268 km Galatea Ceres Despina Sycorax 惑星以外の37天体は 木村 淳 (大阪大学) correct relative sizes 惑星圏研究会@東北大学 28th Feb., 2018 Himalia Science of icy moons Spacecraft Explorations History of Outer Solar System Juno Interior Atmo/Magnetosphere Galileo Cassini •Ocean: depth, thick, composition • (Tomoki‐san’s & Shimizu‐san’s talk) • Degree and timing of layering • When magnetosphere formed? • Type of “Rock” •Chemical reactions (Titan) Habitability Voyager 1 Voyager 2 Pioneer 10 Tectonics Composition Pioneer 11 • Origin of crustal stress • Identification of organics New Horizons • Ice rheology • Primordial? Delivered? • Subduction/material transfer • Oxidants/Reductants flux •Geologic age • Role of clathrates Moons & Interior • Bulk density! (Radius & mass) dwarf planets Pluto • Geodetic measurements 1.9 3.5 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.9 1.2 Eris • Global shape, Gravity field 1.6 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.6 2.5 Haumea • Tidal responses (deformation, libration, obliquity) 3.3 g/cc 3.0 1.5 1.4 • Moment of Inertia Makemake ? 1.2 2.6‐3.3? >1.4 1.7 • Electro‐Magnetic responses 1.9 • Inductive M‐field, Aurora 1.9 Ceres 1.6 2.2 • Radar/Radio wave Most of moons & dwarf planets 1.8 0.5 have a surface composed mostly • Plume dynamics of ice. • Seismological measurements 1.1 Entire ice abundance? Bulk density 1.6 Water = 1.0 g/cc Rock = 3.0‐3.5 5.5 How can we know about ice abundance (ice/rock ratio)? Interior • Bulk density! (Radius and mass) Bulk density (Rock wt frac.) vs. Radius • Geodetic measurements • Global shape, Gravity field • Tidal responses (deformation, libration, obliquity) ~1.0 large response = soft interior (e.g., ocean) I=0.4 ~3.0 ? I<0.4 Eris • Moment of Inertia 2.0 g/cc 2.0 g/cc Small MoI = high deg of mass concentration • I=0.346 Electro‐Magnetic responses 0.311 • Inductive magnetic field, Aurora 0.355 (e.g., salty ocean) Assuming: int. conductivity 表層200km厚 がH O Water = 1.0 g/cc 2 表層1500km • 0.341 厚が Rock = 3.5 Radar/Radio wave H2O • Plume dynamics 0.33‐34? 表層30km厚 • Seismological measurements がH O 2 Magnetic field Atmosphere/ionosphere HST G140L spectra Hall+ 1998 • Inductive field (Eu, Ga, Ca), depends on… • Thin, radiolytically/thermally‐formed • Eu (O , 0.1uPa), Ga (O , 1uPa), Ca (CO , 0.8uPa), • Primary field changing and subsurface ocean properties; depth, 2 2 2 Rh (O2,CO2), Di (CO2), Tt (CO2) thickness and conductivity (Galileo MAG couldn’t discern, but JUICE MAG will!) • Metallic core driven field (Ga) • Convection in the molten core : recently induced? Reflected sunlight model • When the core has been formed? • Accretional heat is insufficient (cold start). Johnson+ 2004 CMB温度 • If the core has a low eutectic point • Thin, volcanically‐formed Excess oxygen line emission is interpreted as airglow (e.g., FeS‐Fe O , 1250 K) from tenuous oxygen atms. 3 4 , only radiogenic heat • Io (SO2, 0.1u‐0.1mPa), En (H2O), Tr (N2, 1Pa) could form the core later (Kimura in prep.). 核内断熱温度勾配 • Thick, Earth‐like (Titan) CMB熱流量 • How to know the timing of core formation • 1.45 atm@surface, N2 (97%), CH4 (2.7%), H2 and of starting dynamo? [Kimura+, 2009] (0.1%), hydrocarbons, tholins, lack of noble gases. • Climate (CH ‐C H ‐circulation: cloud, rain and lake, season) • e.g., Irradiated alteration signature on surface? 4 2 6 (Tomoki‐san’s talk) Eu=Europa, Ga=Ganymede, Ca=Callisto En=Enceladus, Rh=Rhea, Di=Dione, Tt=Titania, Tr=Triton Surface Morphology/Tectonics Coloring agent and process • Linear deformation: • Spotted deformation: • Agents: non‐H2O compounds crack, ridge, fault, band, groove… chaos, macula, lenticula… Rocks, organics, salts(?), acids(?)… • Lithospheric stress • Localized heat from below NaCl: 10 keV electrons, Europa • Processes: Icy sublimation and irradiation 20.9h 465 Grad dose Europa Iapetus Kimura+ 2011 4 Gyr Hand and Carlson 2016 Moore+ 1999 • Impact crater: Europa central peak/pit, rampart, multi‐ring, palimpsest… 10 km Surface Morphology/Tectonics How drive surface tectonics Ocean thickness evolution of Europa • Linear deformation: crack, ridge, fault, band, groove… 1565 Schematic view of stress build‐up and tectonism Water layer • Lithospheric stress stress source & ice shell thickness/rheology Rocky mantle 1428 Europa • Global: tide, nonsynchronous rotation, Metallic 575 polar wander, volume change core Ocean duration highly • Local: convection, flexure, impact depends on the ice rheology Europa stress field under perijove (Harada & Kurita, 2006) 1015 (CI) Tidal and/or convective stress w/ shorter timescale Kimura+ 2007, Kimura in prep.170220‐6‐7‐9‐8 Kimura+ 2007 Surface tensile stress build‐up w/ time Ocean freezing generates volume change Nimmo & Gaidos, 2002 0.1 MPa Caveat: and surface tensile stress Insufficient for Tensile strength of water ice ice strength Lithosphere viscosity 1023 Pas Solid‐state conv. in the shell Shear heating? Kimura+ 2007 Icy Plate Tectonics? Icy Plate Tectonics? • Missing surface area to balance the observed extension • Missing surface area to balance the observed extension • Transporting surface materials (e.g., irradiated‐formed oxidants) in • Transporting surface materials (e.g., irradiated‐formed oxidants) in deep? deep? Tectonic reconstruction Shell dynamics highly depends on the ice shell thickness/rheology Kattenhorn and Prockter, 2014 Surface Morphology/Tectonics Surface Morphology/Tectonics • Spotted deformation: • Linear deformation: • Spotted deformation: chaos, macula, lenticula… crack, ridge, fault, band, groove… chaos, macula, lenticula… Structure and dynamics • Localized heat from below • Lithospheric stress • Localized heat from below of the ice shell Europa Europa Europa • Solid‐state ice convection • Shallow ocean • Melt pocket in the shell Depends on interior evolution & Ice shell thickness changing 40 km Thin conductive shell period? Thick convective shell period? • Impact crater: Europa central peak/pit, rampart, multi‐ring, palimpsest… Collins & Nimmo, 2009 Sotin+, 2002 10 km 10 km Surface Morphology/Tectonics Cratering rates and estimated age are highly ambiguous 10 Projectiles Halley‐type + Callisto Projectiles [km‐2 yr‐1] population based Long‐period comet • Impact Crater: central peak/pit, rampart, multi‐ring, population based on Triton’s CSFD Smith+ 1981 1 palimpsest… on Eu & Ga’s CSFD • Size‐depth rel.: larger craters penetrate deeper 0.1 Reflects heat flux, ice shell thickness and Depth (km) 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 rheology mainly when the crater was formed. Diameter (km) 10 Dones+ 2009 Ganymede and Callisto Ganymede 1 Saturnian moons 0.1 30 km Depth (km) Cratering rates could be changed >10 times 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Dones+ 2009 because of unknown population of projectiles Europa Diameter (km) to form crater with D>10km 10 Europa 1 Quite different than rocky planets Estimated ages have a great uncertainty 10 km (e.g., Mimas’ age ~4.4 Gyr? or 0.75 Gyr?). 0.1 • Size‐freq. distribution: surface age estimation Depth (km) Need to know a population of ecliptic 0.01 Large ambiguity (~Gyr) : low res. image & unk. impact flux 0.1 1 10 100 comets (e.g., by impact flash of Giant Planets?). Diameter (km) Schenk, 2002 CSFD=Cater Size‐Frequency Distribution Chemical composition Water + plume(s) Enceladus • Constraints: Bulk density, IR/UV reflectance, plume analysis • ~100 indv. jets in some cases turn on/off • no systematic relation to orbital phase • Major: H O and Rock (CI‐chondritic? should be confirmed by future Trojan expl.) 2 • ~1 km/s (vapor), ~10s m/s (grain), ~ 100 kg/s • Minor: no‐H2O ices, Salts, Acids, Organics SP • Comet‐like compositions CO , SO , CH , H SO C H , Europa by Keck Tele. IR 2 2 4 MgSO4, 2 4 x y • Gas: H O, CO , CH , NH , organics NH , N , CO Na SO H CO, 2 2 4 3 3 2 2 4 2 4 • Solid: H O, NaCl, carbonates, silica CH3CHO, SO Porco+ 2006 2 Ganymede CO2 abs. 2 (4.26 um) map by Galileo CH3OH, H Dark old Enceladus 3.44 um HCN cratered abs. by Cassini Europa terrain • 3~4 jets in some cases turn on/off O ice 2 • Bright ~ 1 km/s, ~ 500 kg/s/plume Organics younger Pure H • terrain (C‐H stretch) Not all observations could detect. • Likely