Water Cycle Evidence for the Vale of Aylesbury Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Cycle Evidence for the Vale of Aylesbury Plan Water cycle evidence for the Vale of Aylesbury Plan Final document Document: 001 Version: 4 Aylesbury Vale District Council September 2012 Water cycle evidence for the Vale of Aylesbury Plan Final document Document: 001 Version: 4 Aylesbury Vale District Council September 2012 Halcrow Group Limited Burderop Park, Swindon, Wiltshire SN4 0QD tel 01793 812479 fax 01793 812089 halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of client Aylesbury Vale District Council for the client’s sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2012 Halcrow Group Limited Burderop Park, Swindon, Wiltshire SN4 0QD tel 01793 812479 fax 01793 812089 halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of client Aylesbury Vale District Council for the client’s sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2012 Water cycle evidence for the Vale of Aylesbury Plan Introduction Document history Water cycle evidence base for the Vale of Aylesbury Plan Aylesbury Vale District Council This document has been issued and amended as follows: Version Date Description Created by Verified by Approved by 1 17/01/2012 Draft document template for Andy McConkey approval 2 21/03/2012 Draft final report for steering Andrew Kamunda Andy Andy group consultation only McConkey McConkey 3 25/07/2012 Final version for signoff Lizzie Shipman Andy McConkey 4 10/09/2012 Final version for publication Lizzie Shipman Andy McConkey Water cycle evidence for the Vale of Aylesbury Plan Introduction Contents 1 Introduction 14 1.1 Project background 14 2 Planning and Development 15 2.1 Context and Vale of Aylesbury Plan 15 3 Flood Risk and Surface Water Management 23 4 Water services infrastructure and water companies 31 4.1 Legislation 31 4.2 Regulation 34 4.3 Developer Contributions 34 5 Water quality and wastewater treatment 36 5.1 Wastewater and Water quality 36 5.2 Water quality and wastewater treatment methodology – larger settlements 36 5.3 Water quality and wastewater treatment methodology – smaller settlements 37 5.4 Wastewater treatment capacity 37 6 Drainage network infrastructure 39 6.1 Assessment methodology 39 7 Water resources and water supply 40 7.1 Water supply infrastructure assessment methodology 40 8 Sustainable settlement analysis 41 8.1 Larger settlements in the Northern Vale market area 41 8.1.1 Buckingham market sub area 42 8.1.2 Winslow 46 8.2 Smaller settlements in the Northern Vale market area 49 8.2.1 Beachampton 49 8.2.2 Akeley 51 8.2.3 Gawcott 54 8.2.4 Thornborough 57 8.2.5 Tingewick 60 8.2.6 Chackmore 63 8.2.7 Radclive 66 8.2.8 Newton Longeville 68 Water cycle evidence for the Vale of Aylesbury Plan Introduction 8.2.9 Drayton Parslow 70 8.2.10 Great Horwood 73 8.2.11 Little Horwood 77 8.2.12 Hillesden 80 8.2.13 Thornton 83 8.2.14 Middle Claydon 85 8.2.15 Chetwode 89 8.2.16 Padbury 91 8.2.17 Calvert Green 94 8.2.18 Steeple Claydon 97 8.2.19 Stowe 100 8.2.20 Mursley 102 8.2.21 Swanbourne 105 8.2.22 Nash 108 8.2.23 East Claydon 111 8.2.24 Granborough 114 8.2.25 Stewkley 117 8.2.26 Marsh Gibbon 120 8.3 Larger settlements in the Southern Vale market area 124 8.3.1 Aylesbury 125 8.3.2 Haddenham 129 8.3.3 Wendover 132 8.4 Smaller settlements in the Southern Vale market area 136 8.4.1 Aston Abbots 136 8.4.2 Slapton 139 8.4.3 Ivinghoe 143 8.4.4 Pitstone 146 8.4.5 North Marston 148 8.4.6 Oving 151 8.4.7 Whitchurch 154 8.4.8 Edlesborough 157 8.4.9 Cublington 161 8.4.10 Wing 164 8.4.11 Wingrave 167 8.4.12 Rowsham 169 8.4.13 Creslow 171 8.4.14 Aston Clinton 173 8.4.15 Buckland 176 8.4.16 Drayton Beauchamp 179 8.4.17 Halton 182 8.4.18 Hardwick 185 8.4.19 Hulcott 189 8.4.20 Ashendon 193 Water cycle evidence for the Vale of Aylesbury Plan Introduction 8.4.21 Cheddington 196 8.4.22 Chilton 200 8.4.23 Chearsley 203 8.4.24 Cuddington 206 8.4.25 Grendon Underwood 209 8.4.26 Kingswood 212 8.4.27 Long Crendon 215 8.4.28 Ludgershall 217 8.4.29 Marsworth 220 8.4.30 Boarstall 223 8.4.31 Shabbington 226 8.4.32 Dinton 229 8.4.33 Quainton 232 8.4.34 Waddesdon 235 8.4.35 Westcott 238 8.4.36 Oakley 241 8.4.37 Worminghall 244 8.4.38 Brill 247 8.4.39 Ickford 250 8.4.40 Weedon 253 9 Conclusions and recommendations 256 Appendix A - Aylesbury Sub-Market Area flood risk management maps Appendix B - Buckingham Sub-Market Area flood risk management maps Appendix C - Aylesbury Vale Northern Area flood risk management maps Appendix D- Aylesbury Vale Southern Area flood risk management maps Appendix E - Interactive SUDS map Water cycle evidence for the Vale of Aylesbury Plan Introduction Glossary Annual Exceedance Probability – Used in this report to refer to flood risk and flood defence standard of protection. A standard of protection to the 1 in 100 year event means that the location has a 1% chance (1 in 100) of flooding in any year, this is the 1% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP). This does not mean that if the location floods in one year, it will definitely not flood again for the next 99 years, or that if it has not flooded for the previous 99 years, that it will definitely flood this year. Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) - Assesses the implementation of the Local Development Scheme and the extent to which policies in Local Development Documents are being successfully implemented. Appropriate Assessment – Required by the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) for all plans or projects which, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects, would be likely to have a significant effect on a European classified conservation site, or are not directly connected with the management of the site for nature conservation. Its purpose is to assess the implications of a proposal in respect to the site’s conservation objectives. The assessment process is not specified by the regulations but is usually an iterative process at a level dependent on the location, size and significance of the proposed plan or project. English Nature can advise on whether a plan or project is likely to have a significant effect and thus require assessment. Area Action Plans – Development Plan Documents that provide a planning framework for areas of change and areas of conservation. Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) - Were brought into being by the same legislation as National Parks - the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act of 1949. They are fine landscapes, of great variety in character and extent. The criteria for designation are their outstanding natural beauty. Many AONBs also fulfil a recreational role but, unlike national parks, this is not a designation criteria. The Countryside Agency and the Countryside Council for Wales are responsible for designating AONBs and advising Government on policies for their protection. Asset Management Plan (AMP) - a plan for managing an water companies’ infrastructure and other assets in order to deliver an agreed standard of service. The Asset Management Plans are submitted to Ofwat every 5 years and forms the basis by which water rates are set. These plans identify the timescales and levels of investment required to maintain and upgrade the serviceability of the assets. Biochemical oxygen demand (B.O.D) – This is the amount of dissolved oxygen needed by aerobic biological organisms in a body of water to break down organic material present in a given water sample at certain temperature over a specific time period. The term also refers to a chemical procedure for determining this amount. This is not a precise quantitative test, although it is widely used as an indication of the organic quality of water. The BOD value is most commonly expressed in milligrams of oxygen consumed per litre of sample during 5 days of incubation at 20 °C and is often used as a robust surrogate of the degree of organic pollution of Water cycle evidence for the Vale of Aylesbury Plan Introduction water.BOD can be used as a gauge of the effectiveness of wastewater treatment plants. BREEAM - The Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. This is a method of assessing the environmental sustainability of a new building. The BREEAM has been superseded by the Code for Sustainable homes for residential developments, but is still in common usage for non-residential developments. Catchment Abstraction Management Strategy (CAMS) – a strategy to assess how much water can be abstracted to meet its many economic uses – agriculture, industry, and drinking water supply – while leaving sufficient water in the environment to meet ecological needs. Catchment Flood Management Plan (CFMP) – A strategic planning tool through which the Environment Agency seeks to work with other key decision-makers within a river catchment, to identify and agree policies for sustainable flood risk management. Code for Sustainable Homes – the Code for Sustainable Homes - a new national standard for sustainable design and construction of new homes—was launched in December 2006. The code measures the sustainability of a new home against a range of sustainability criteria.
Recommended publications
  • River Cherwell Catchment Management Plan
    NRA Thames 228 RIVER CHERWELL CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT ACTION PLAN National Rivers Authority November 1995 Thames Region - West Area Isis House Howbery Park Wallingford Oxon 0X10 8BD KEY CATCHMENT STATISTICS Catchment area: 906 km2 Average Annual rainfall (1941-70): 682mm Total Main River length: 506km Population (estimate): 137,000 NRA National Rrvers Authority Thames Region General Features Local Authorities CMP Boundary Water Body Urban Areas Stratford-on-Avon West Oxfordshire Main Rivers Lock County Boundary' Daventry South Oxfordshire Non Main Rivers Motorway □ S. Northants. Oxford City Oxford Canal A Road Chcrwell Aylesbury Vale VISION 1-OR TIIE RIVER Cl IER WELL CATCHMENT In preparing the catchment visiou, the NRA has defined what it would wish the catchment to be aud the principle we will be following in working towards that visiou. The catchmeut visiou may not be something that cau be achieved iu the next five years, but something we can all work towards. Whilst the Cherwell Catchment lies largely within Oxfordshire it also encroaches into Buckinghamshire to the east and Warwickshire and Northamptonshire to the north. From its source at Charwelton to the Thames confluence, the river generally flows north to south and over a length of about 96 bn falls 100 metres, draining an area o f over 900 Ian2. Agriculture is the main land use in the catchment and has influenced the character of its countryside and landscape. The contribution made by the River Cherwell to the character of Oxfordshire in particular is recognised by several policies in the Structure Plan which seek to protect and enhance its natural features.
    [Show full text]
  • Lillingstone House
    Understanding Historic Parks & Gardens in Buckinghamshire The Buckinghamshire Gardens Trust Research & Recording Project ‘Lillingstone Dayrell House built 1845’ Historic England Archive Lillingstone House December 2016 Bucks Gardens Trust The Stanley Smith (UK) Horticultural Trust Bucks Gardens Trust, Site Dossier: Lillingstone House, AVDC 04 December 2016 HISTORIC SITE BOUNDARY 1 Bucks Gardens Trust, Site Dossier: Lillingstone House, AVDC 04 December 2016 Background to the Project This site dossier has been prepared as part of The Buckinghamshire Gardens Trust (BGT) Research and Recording Project, begun in 2014. This site is one of several hundred designed landscapes county‐wide identified by Bucks County Council (BCC) in 1998 (including Milton Keynes District) as potentially retaining evidence of historic interest, as part of the Historic Parks and Gardens Register Review project carried out for English Heritage (now Historic England) (BCC Report No. 508). The list is not definitive and further parks and gardens may be identified as research continues or further information comes to light. Content BGT has taken the Register Review list as a sound basis from which to select sites for appraisal as part of its Research and Recording Project for designed landscapes in the historic county of Bucks (pre‐1974 boundaries). For each site a dossier is prepared by volunteers trained on behalf of BGT by experts in appraising designed landscapes who have worked extensively for English Heritage/Historic England on its Register Upgrade Project. Each dossier includes the following for the site: A site boundary mapped on the current Ordnance Survey to indicate the extent of the main part of the surviving designed landscape, also a current aerial photograph.
    [Show full text]
  • Aylesbury Vale WCS Granborough CP
    Aylesbury Vale District Granborough CP Aylesbury Vale District Parish Boundaries Development Sites Winslow Proposed Development Sites Surface Water WFD Surface Water Classifications High Good Moderate Poor Swanbourne CP Bad Groundwater Superficial Aquifers Secondary (undifferentiated) Secondary A Unproductive Granborough CP Bedrock Aquifers Principal Secondary (undifferentiated) Secondary A Secondary B Unproductive Source Protection Zones Zone 1 - Inner Protection Zone Zone 2 - Outer Protection Zone Zone 3 - Total Catchment Aylesbury Vale WCS Water Constraints Oving CP and Opportunities 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Km Contains Ordnance Survey data (c) Crown copyright and database right 2016 Aylesbury Vale District Great Horwood CP Aylesbury Vale District Nash CP Parish Boundaries Development Sites Whaddon CP Proposed Development Sites Surface Water WFD Surface Water Classifications High Good Moderate Poor Bad Groundwater Superficial Aquifers Secondary (undifferentiated) Great Horwood CP Secondary A Unproductive Adstock CP Bedrock Aquifers Principal Little Horwood CP Secondary (undifferentiated) Secondary A Secondary B Unproductive Source Protection Zones Zone 1 - Inner Protection Zone Zone 2 - Outer Protection Zone Zone 3 - Total Catchment Aylesbury Vale WCS Water Constraints Swanbourne CP and Opportunities Winslow 0 0.3 0.6 1.2 Km Contains Ordnance Survey data (c) Crown copyright and database right 2016 Aylesbury Vale District Grendon Underwood CP Steeple Claydon CP Aylesbury Vale District Parish Boundaries Development Sites Proposed Development Sites
    [Show full text]
  • Age 25 Army Unit 3Rd Brigade Canadian Field Artillery Enlisted: January 1915 in Canadian Expeditionary Force
    Arthur Kempster Corporal - Service No. 42703 - Age 25 Army Unit 3rd Brigade Canadian Field Artillery Enlisted: January 1915 in Canadian Expeditionary Force Arthur was born on the 8th May 1893 in Wingrave. The son of George and Sarah (nee Jakeman) Kempster, he was brought up in Crafton with 6 other children, his father was a shepherd. In 1911 he and his brother were butcher’s assistants in Wealdstone, Middlesex. He died on the 19th November 1918 from mustard gas and influenza. He is buried in Wingrave Congregational Chapel Yard and is also commemorated at All Saints, Wing. His brother, Harry Fredrick Kempster was born in Wingrave in 1890. He died on the 2nd October 1917 in Flanders, Belgium. Harry was a rifleman with the Royal Irish Rifles, 7th Battalion. Whilst killed in action, he is not mentioned on the Mentmore War Memorial. © Mentmore Parish History Group. With thanks to Andy Cooke, John Smith (Cheddington History Soc), Lynda Sharp and Karen Thomas for research and information. Ernest Taylor Private - Service No. 29168 - Age 30 6th Battalion Duke of Wellington’s [West Riding] Regiment. Enlisted: Huddersfield Died July 27th 1918, in the No 3 Australian Causality Clearing station, Brandhoek. Suffered gunshot wounds to his back, forehead and neck. Buried Esquelbecq Military Cemetery III D 14. Born 1887 Cheddington, Son of William and Mary (nee Baker) Taylor Ernest married Elizabeth Kelly (nee Firth). Elizabeth was a widow with four small children. The couple met and married in Huddersfield and had a child of their own on 11th Nov 1916. Ernest had worked on a local farm in Cheddington then he moved to Huddersfield where he became a goods porter.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Wing Neighbourhood Plan
    Wing Neighbourhood Plan 2014 – 31 Draft: April 2014 0 Contents CONTENT PAGE CONTENT PAGE NO. NO. Foreword 2 Policy VE1 18 1. Introduction 3 9. Economy 19 What is a Neighbourhood Plan? 3 Community 19 Why should Wing have a 3 Commercial Businesses 19 Neighbourhood Plan 2. Planning Context 4 Policies E1, E2, E3, E4 20 National Planning Policy 4 10. Traffic and Transport 21 Aylesbury Vale District Council Planning 4 Public Transport 21 Policy 3. Vision and Objectives 5 Roads 21 4. Community Involvement 6 Congestion and Pedestrians 22 5. Countryside and Green Space 6 Parking 23 Landscape and Trees 7 Policies T1, T2, T3 23 Green Spaces 7 11. Housing 24 Footpaths 8 Housing Market 24 Access to Strategic Green Spaces, Long 8 Infill Housing 25 Distance Footpaths and Bridleways Long Spinney 10 Housing Mix 26 Allotments 10 Housing Needs 26 Wildlife 10 Policies HO1, HO2, HO3 27 Policies CGS 1,2,3 11, 12 12. Housing Allocations 28 6. Facilities 13 Methodology 28 General Facilities 13 Stewkley Road/Dormer Avenue 30 Allotments Leisure 13 Policy A1 30 Healthcare 13 Meadow Way/Moorlands 31 Policy F1 14 Policy A2 31 7. Heritage 15 13. Community Facilities for the 32 Future History 15 Required Facilities List 33 Conservation Area 16 14. Implementation and 34 Monitoring Heritage Group 17 Neighbourhood Plan Map 35 Policies HE1, HE2 17 Glossary 36 8. Visiting and Enjoying Wing 18 Table showing relationship 37 between Policies and objectives Wing Heritage and Wildlife Trails 18 1 Foreword In 2011, the Localism Act introduced a new opportunity for local communities to shape their future formally as part of the planning system.
    [Show full text]
  • Aylesbury Vale North Locality Profile
    Aylesbury Vale North Locality Profile Prevention Matters Priorities The Community Links Officer (CLO) has identified a number of key Prevention Matters priorities for the locality that will form the focus of the work over the next few months. These priorities also help to determine the sort of services and projects where Prevention Matters grants can be targeted. The priorities have been identified using the data provided by the Community Practice Workers (CPW) in terms of successful referrals and unmet demand (gaps where there are no appropriate services available), consultation with district council officers, town and parish councils, other statutory and voluntary sector organisations and also through the in depth knowledge of the cohort and the locality that the CLO has gained. The CLO has also worked with the other CLOs across the county to identify some key countywide priorities which affect all localities. Countywide Priorities Befriending Community Transport Aylesbury Vale North Priorities Affordable Day Activities Gentle Exercise Low Cost Gardening Services Dementia Services Social Gardening Men in Sheds Outreach for Carers Background data Physical Area The Aylesbury Vale North locality (AV North) is just less than 200 square miles in terms of land area (500 square kilometres). It is a very rural locality in the north of Buckinghamshire. There are officially 63 civil parishes covering the area (approximately a third of the parishes in Bucks). There are 2 small market towns, Buckingham and Winslow, and approximately 70 villages or hamlets (as some of the parishes cover more than one village). Population The total population of the Aylesbury Vale North locality (AV North) is 49,974 based on the populations of the 63 civil parishes from the 2011 Census statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Aylesbury Vale Councillor Update Economic Profile of Brill Ward
    Aylesbury Vale Councillor Update Economic Profile of Brill Ward April 2014 Produced by Buckinghamshire Business First’s research department P a g e | 2 1.0 Introduction Brill is home to 2,578 people and provides 800 jobs in 143 businesses. Of these businesses, 29 (20.3 per cent) are Buckinghamshire Business First members. There were 1,341 employed people aged 16-74 living in Brill ward at the 2011 Census, 14 fewer than the 1,355 recorded in 2001. Over that period the working age population fell 130 to 1,592 while the total population fell 147 to 2,578. The number of households rose by 7 (0.7 per cent) to 1,068. This was the 27th fastest increase in Aylesbury Vale and the 94th fastest . The largest companies in Brill include: Chilton House; Chilton Home Farms Ltd; Fennell Blake & Co Ltd; G S Mechanicals Ltd; L G Kimber Engineering Ltd; Merson I-Level Retail; and Magnolia Park Golf & Country Club There are nine Brill, representing 0.5 per cent of working age residents, including five claimants aged 18-24 and five who have been claiming for more than twelve months. Commercial fibre coverage (as provided by BT and Virgin Media) is set to cover 1 per cent of Brill by 2015. The Connected Countiesi project run by BBF will deliver a further 80 per cent through intervention in the Bicester, Brill, Ickford, Long Crendon and Stanton St John exchange areas. The project will deliver extended superfast footprint via additional funding, adaptation of downstream technology and contract claw-back mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Coaching Days on the Oxford Road
    Coaching days on the Oxford Road Before the A40 was constructed, travellers from London to Oxford and Worcester came through Wheatley and details of royalty and others who did so have already been described. It is important to understand the differing routes which have run through Wheatley from 1593, with these being shown on Jack Turner’s excellent interpretation of the 1593 All Souls College map onto which he has added more recent features and names. Coming from London in 1593, the traveller crossed over Wheatley bridge (at the bottom of the map). Shortly afterwards, and whilst still in the parish of Holton, there was a choice of either turning left or continuing straight on. A ‘dry route’ avoided the brook along the valley through the village, by taking the left turn to Shotover and turning left again at the Cley Hill field. It is described on the 1593 map as the ‘waye leading from Wheatley bridge to Shotover’ and leads on into Oxford. The route which went straight on followed the line of the London Road (including the ‘bulge’, now Old London Road), turning left into what is now Church Road (merely a track at the time), and thence into, and across, Westfield towards Forest Hill, and on to Islip and Worcester. By the time that coaches were travelling from London to Oxford, they would have taken the left turn after the bridge which linked up with Roman Road, ignoring the Cley Hill turn, before becoming Crown Road, and thence Wheatley High Street, thus enabling the coaches to avoid the steep climb up Castle Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Version of AVDLP
    AYLESBURY VALE DISTRICT COUNCIL AAyylleessbbuurryy VVaallee DDiissttrriicctt LLooccaall PPllaann WWrriitttteenn SStatatteemmeenntt Part AVJJAANNUUAARRYYD 22000044 LPaPrtII The Aylesbury Vale District Local Plan is published in two parts: Part I - the Written Statement and Conservation Area map insets - and Part II which comprises the Proposals Map. The Written Statement and Proposals Map should be read in conjunction with each other. Part II contains 33 sheets to a scale of 1:20,000 covering the whole District - where necessary insets to a larger scale are included to show details clearly. It includes insets for Aylesbury, Buckingham, Haddenham, Wendover & Winslow on two loose sheets. Norman Skedge Director Department of Environment and Planning Friars Square Offices 4 Great Western Street Aylesbury Bucks HP20 2TW JANUARY 2004 Tel: 01296 585439 Fax: 01296 398665 Minicom: 01296 585055 DX: 4130 Aylesbury E-mail: [email protected] AVDLPForeword FOREWORD We live in times of constant change. This Development Plan, the most important yet produced for our District, reflects - even anticipates - change in a way that earlier plans did not come close to doing. Yet the Council's corporate mission - to make Aylesbury Vale the best possible place for people to live and work - remains a timeless guiding principle. So comprehensive is this District Local Plan for Aylesbury Vale that it will affect the lives of people over the next seven years to 2011. There are two main themes: sustainability and accessibility. Sustainability, in its purest sense, requires us to take no more from the environment than we put back. The Council has striven to minimise consumption of natural resources by looking carefully at the demands development makes on land, air and water, and its impact on the natural and historical environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Family and Estate Papers
    Family and estate papers Reference AL Family ALEXANDER of Pavenham Bury Archive type Deeds to land Places included Bedfordshire: Ampthill; Felmersham; Kempston; Oakley; Pavenham; Stevington; Riseley; Wilstead Berkshire: Bourton Essex: Woodford Middlesex: Finsbury Wiltshire: Bishopstone Reference AN Family ALINGTON of Little Barford Archive type: Deeds to land Places included: Bedfordshire: Arlesey; Eaton Socon; Great Barford; Henlow; Little Barford; Renhold; Stotfold Essex: West Ham Hertfordshire: Ashwell; Baldock; Bygrave; Clothall; Hitchin; Letchworth; Norton; Sandon; Wallington; Weston Huntingdonshire: Abbotsley Kent: Bromley; Wrotham Middlesex: Holborn; Westminster Northamptonshire: Burton Latimer; Finedon; Twywell Reference S/AM Family ASHBURNHAM of Ampthill Archive type Deeds to land; estate administration Places included Bedfordshire: Ampthill; Bedford; Bolnhurst; Brogborough; Clapham; Goldington; Higham Gobion; Lidlington; Marston Moretaine; Millbrook; Oakley; Ridgmont; Steppingley; Streatley; Thurleigh Reference BD Family BARNARD of Bedford and Cople Archive type Barnard's Bank; family papers; executors/trustees papers; deeds to land Places included Bedfordshire: Bedford; Roxton; Wilden Reference B Family BRANDRETH of Houghton Regis Archive type Genealogical; correspondence re Whitehead's School, Houghton Regis; estate papers; deeds to land Places included Bedfordshire: Ampthill; Caddington; Chalgrave; Houghton Regis; Stanbridge Reference BW Family BROWNLOW of Ashridge [Hertfordshire] Archive type Estate papers; deeds to land
    [Show full text]
  • The Transport System of Medieval England and Wales
    THE TRANSPORT SYSTEM OF MEDIEVAL ENGLAND AND WALES - A GEOGRAPHICAL SYNTHESIS by James Frederick Edwards M.Sc., Dip.Eng.,C.Eng.,M.I.Mech.E., LRCATS A Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Salford Department of Geography 1987 1. CONTENTS Page, List of Tables iv List of Figures A Note on References Acknowledgements ix Abstract xi PART ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter One: Setting Out 2 Chapter Two: Previous Research 11 PART TWO THE MEDIEVAL ROAD NETWORK 28 Introduction 29 Chapter Three: Cartographic Evidence 31 Chapter Four: The Evidence of Royal Itineraries 47 Chapter Five: Premonstratensian Itineraries from 62 Titchfield Abbey Chapter Six: The Significance of the Titchfield 74 Abbey Itineraries Chapter Seven: Some Further Evidence 89 Chapter Eight: The Basic Medieval Road Network 99 Conclusions 11? Page PART THREE THr NAVIGABLE MEDIEVAL WATERWAYS 115 Introduction 116 Chapter Hine: The Rivers of Horth-Fastern England 122 Chapter Ten: The Rivers of Yorkshire 142 Chapter Eleven: The Trent and the other Rivers of 180 Central Eastern England Chapter Twelve: The Rivers of the Fens 212 Chapter Thirteen: The Rivers of the Coast of East Anglia 238 Chapter Fourteen: The River Thames and Its Tributaries 265 Chapter Fifteen: The Rivers of the South Coast of England 298 Chapter Sixteen: The Rivers of South-Western England 315 Chapter Seventeen: The River Severn and Its Tributaries 330 Chapter Eighteen: The Rivers of Wales 348 Chapter Nineteen: The Rivers of North-Western England 362 Chapter Twenty: The Navigable Rivers of
    [Show full text]
  • Ray CTA (Conservation Target Area) the Alluvial
    Ray CTA (Conservation Target Area) The alluvial floodplain of the River Ray extending along a number of small tributary streams and including some areas of land between these streams. This area extends into Buckinghamshire. The area extends onto the clay to included known areas of wet grassland and the main areas of ridge and furrow. Joint Character Area: Thames and Avon Vales Landscape Types: Alluvial Lowland with some areas of Clay Vale. Geology: Mainly alluvium along the Ray. Alluvium is also present in narrow bands along the small streams and there are Oxford Clay mudstones away from the streams and river. Topography . Flat riverside land. Area of CTA: 1192 hectares Biodiversity: • Lowland Meadow. The key habitat in this area. It is found in a number of SSSIs and Local Wildlife Sites mainly at least partly on the alluvium. North-west of Blackthorn Hill there is a larger group of meadows which are largely on the Oxford Clay. Remnants of this habitat are found elsewhere especially between Bicester and Blackthorn Hill and in some meadows in Buckinghamshire including BBOWT’s recent addition to their Upper Ray Meadows Reserve at Leaches Farm. • Wet Grassland/Floodplain Grazing Marsh. Wet grassland is found in meadows along with lowland meadow habitat with remnants elsewhere. Parts of the BBOWT Upper Ray Reserves have been restored to floodplain grazing marsh. • Hedgerows. Some rich and well structured hedgerows with brown and black hairstreak. • Ponds at Leaches Farm BBOWT reserve. • Other Species: true fox sedge is found in a number of sites in the area. Access: Largely restricted to bridleways and footpaths.
    [Show full text]