DOCSLIB.ORG

Algebra & Number Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Algebra & Number Theory Algebra & Number Theory Volume 2 2008 No. 8 mathematical sciences publishers Algebra & Number Theory www.jant.org EDITORS MANAGING EDITOR EDITORIAL BOARD CHAIR Bjorn Poonen David Eisenbud University of California University of California Berkeley, USA Berkeley, USA BOARD OF EDITORS Georgia Benkart University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA Susan Montgomery University of Southern California, USA Dave Benson University of Aberdeen, Scotland Shigefumi Mori RIMS, Kyoto University, Japan Richard E. Borcherds University of California, Berkeley, USA Andrei Okounkov Princeton University, USA John H. Coates University of Cambridge, UK Raman Parimala Emory University, USA J-L. Colliot-Thel´ ene` CNRS, Universite´ Paris-Sud, France Victor Reiner University of Minnesota, USA Brian D. Conrad University of Michigan, USA Karl Rubin University of California, Irvine, USA Hel´ ene` Esnault Universitat¨ Duisburg-Essen, Germany Peter Sarnak Princeton University, USA Hubert Flenner Ruhr-Universitat,¨ Germany Michael Singer North Carolina State University, USA Edward Frenkel University of California, Berkeley, USA Ronald Solomon Ohio State University, USA Andrew Granville Universite´ de Montreal,´ Canada Vasudevan Srinivas Tata Inst. of Fund. Research, India Joseph Gubeladze San Francisco State University, USA J. Toby Stafford University of Michigan, USA Ehud Hrushovski Hebrew University, Israel Bernd Sturmfels University of California, Berkeley, USA Craig Huneke University of Kansas, USA Richard Taylor Harvard University, USA Mikhail Kapranov Yale University, USA Ravi Vakil Stanford University, USA Yujiro Kawamata University of Tokyo, Japan Michel van den Bergh Hasselt University, Belgium Janos´ Kollar´ Princeton University, USA Marie-France Vigneras´ Universite´ Paris VII, France Hendrik W. Lenstra Universiteit Leiden, The Netherlands Kei-Ichi Watanabe Nihon University, Japan Yuri Manin Northwestern University, USA Andrei Zelevinsky Northeastern University, USA Barry Mazur Harvard University, USA Efim Zelmanov University of California, San Diego, USA PRODUCTION [email protected] Paulo Ney de Souza, Production Manager Silvio Levy, Senior Production Editor See inside back cover or www.jant.org for submission instructions. Regular subscription rate for 2008: $180.00 a year ($120.00 electronic only). Subscriptions, requests for back issues from the last three years and changes of subscribers address should be sent to Mathe- matical Sciences Publishers, Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3840, USA. Algebra & Number Theory, ISSN 1937-0652, at Mathematical Sciences Publishers, Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3840 is published continuously online. Periodical rate postage paid at Berkeley, CA 94704, and additional mailing offices. PUBLISHED BY mathematical sciences publishers http://www.mathscipub.org A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION Typeset in LATEX Copyright c 2010 by Mathematical Sciences Publishers ALGEBRA AND NUMBER THEORY 2:8(2008) Integral points on hyperelliptic curves Yann Bugeaud, Maurice Mignotte, Samir Siksek, Michael Stoll and Szabolcs Tengely 2 n Let C V Y D an X C···C a0 be a hyperelliptic curve with the ai rational inte- gers, n ≥ 5, and the polynomial on the right-hand side irreducible. Let J be its Jacobian. We give a completely explicit upper bound for the integral points on the model C, provided we know at least one rational point on C and a Mordell– Weil basis for J.Q/. We also explain a powerful refinement of the Mordell–Weil sieve which, combined with the upper bound, is capable of determining all the integral points. Our method is illustrated by determining the integral points on 2 − D 5 − Y D X the genus 2 hyperelliptic models Y Y X X and 2 5 . 1. Introduction Consider the hyperelliptic curve with affine model 2 n n−1 C V Y D an X C an−1 X C···C a0; (1-1) with a0;:::; an rational integers, an 6D 0, n ≥ 5, and the polynomial on the right- hand side irreducible. Let H D maxfja0j;:::; janjg. In one of the earliest appli- cations of his theory of lower bounds for linear forms in logarithms, Baker [1969] showed that any integral point .X; Y / on this affine model satisfies 2 max.jXj; jY j/ ≤ exp exp exp.n10n H/n : Such bounds have been improved considerably by many authors, including Sprin- dzukˇ [1977], Brindza [1984], Schmidt [1992], Poulakis [1991], Bilu [1995], Bu- geaud [1997] and Voutier [1995]. Despite the improvements, the bounds remain astronomical and often involve inexplicit constants. In this paper we explain a new method for explicitly computing the integral points on affine models of hyperelliptic curves (1-1). The method falls into two distinct steps: MSC2000: primary 11G30; secondary 11J86. Keywords: curve, integral point, Jacobian, height, Mordell–Weil group, Baker’s bound, Mordell–Weil sieve. 859 860 Y. Bugeaud, M. Mignotte, S. Siksek, M. Stoll and Sz. Tengely (i) We give a completely explicit upper bound for the size of integral solutions of (1-1). This upper bound combines many refinements found in the papers of Voutier, Bugeaud, and others, together with Matveev’s bounds [2000] for linear forms in logarithms, and a method for bounding the regulators based on a theorem of Landau [1918]. (ii) The bounds obtained in (i), whilst substantially better than bounds given by earlier authors, are still astronomical. We explain a powerful variant of the Mordell–Weil sieve which, combined with the bound obtained in (i), is capa- ble of showing that the known solutions to (1-1) are the only ones. Step (i) requires two assumptions: (a) We assume that we know at least one rational point P0 on C. (b) Let J be the Jacobian of C. We assume that a Mordell–Weil basis for J.Q/ is known. For step (ii) we need assumptions (a), (b) and also: (c) We assume that the canonical height hO V J.Q/ ! R is explicitly computable and that we have explicit bounds for the difference O 0 µ1 ≤ h.D/ − h.D/ ≤ µ1 (1-2) where h is an appropriately normalized logarithmic height on J that allows us to enumerate points P in J.Q/ with h.P/ ≤ B for a given bound B. Assumptions (a)–(c) deserve a comment or two. For many families of curves of higher genus, practical descent strategies are available for estimating the rank of the Mordell–Weil group; see for example [Cassels and Flynn 1996; Poonen and Schaefer 1997; Schaefer 1995; Stoll 2001]. To provably determine the Mordell– Weil group one however needs bounds for the difference between the logarithmic and canonical heights. For Jacobians of curves of genus 2 such bounds have been determined by Stoll [1999; 2002], building on previous work of Flynn and Smart [1997]. At present, no such bounds have been determined for Jacobians of curves of genus ≥3, though work on this is in progress. The assumption about the knowledge of a rational point is a common sense assumption that brings some simplifications to our method, though the method can be modified to cope with the situation where no rational point is known. However, if a search on a curve of genus ≥ 2 reveals no rational points, it is probable that there are none, and the methods of Bruin and Stoll [2008a; 2008b; ≥ 2008] are likely to succeed in proving this. We illustrate the practicality of our approach by proving: Theorem 1.1. The only integral solutions to the equation Y 2 − Y D X 5 − X (1-3) Integral points on hyperelliptic curves 861 are .X; Y / D .−1; 0/; .−1; 1/; .0; 0/; .0; 1/; .1; 0/; .1; 1/; .2; −5/; .2; 6/; .3; −15/; .3; 16/; .30; −4929/; .30; 4930/: Theorem 1.2. The only integral solutions to the equation Y X D (1-4) 2 5 are .X; Y / D .0; 0/; .0; 1/; .1; 0/; .1; 1/; .2; 0/; .2; 1/; .3; 0/; .3; 1/; .4; 0/; .4; 1/; .5; −1/; .5; 2/; .6; −3/; .6; 4/; .7; −6/; .7; 7/; .15; −77/; .15; 78/; .19; −152/; .19; 153/: Equations (1-3) and (1-4) are of historical interest and Section 2 gives a brief outline of their history. For now we merely mention that these two equations are the first two problems on a list of 22 unsolved Diophantine problems, compiled by Evertse and Tijdeman [2007] following a recent workshop on Diophantine equations at Leiden. To appreciate why the innocent-looking (1-3) and (1-4) have resisted previous attempts, let us briefly survey the available methods which apply to hyperelliptic curves and then briefly explain why they fail in these cases. To determine the inte- gral points on the affine model C given by (1-1) there are four available methods: (I) The first is Chabauty’s elegant method which in fact determines all rational points on C in many cases, provided the rank of the Mordell–Weil group of its Jacobian is strictly less than the genus g; see for example [Flynn 1997; Wetherell 1997]. Chabauty’s method fails if the rank of the Mordell–Weil group exceeds the genus. (II) The second method is to use coverings, often combined with a version of Chabauty called Elliptic Curve Chabauty. See [Bruin 1999; 2003; Flynn and Wetherell 1999; 2001]. This approach often requires computations of Mordell–Weil groups over number fields (and does fail if the rank of the Mordell–Weil groups is too large). (III) The third method is to combine Baker’s approach through S-units with the LLL algorithm to obtain all the solutions provided that certain relevant unit groups and class groups can be computed; for a modern treatment, see [Bilu and Hanrot 1998] or [Smart 1998, Section XIV.4]. This strategy often fails in practice as the number fields involved have very high degree. 862 Y. Bugeaud, M. Mignotte, S. Siksek, M. Stoll and Sz. Tengely (IV) The fourth approach is to apply Skolem’s method to the S-unit equations (see [Smart 1998, Section III.2]).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mathematical Association of America Ohio Section
    Program of Activities For the 90 th Annual Meeting of the Mathematical Association of America Ohio Section Spring 2006 The University of Akron Akron, Ohio March 31-April 1, 2006 MAA Ohio Section Program Friday, March 31, 2006 8:00—Noon NExT Workshop College of Arts and Sciences Building (CAS) Room 134 Noon—4:30 Registration Student Union, Second Floor, Theatre Area Book exhibits Student Union, Second Floor, Atrium Noon—1:20 Student problem-solving team competition CAS 107 12:15—1:15 Committee Meetings CONCUR Student Union, 308 CONSACT Student Union, 310 CONSTUM Student Union, 312 CONTEAL Student Union, 314 Program Committee Student Union, 316 1:30—1:45 Welcome and Announcements Student Union Theatre 1:45—2:45 Invited address: Student Union Theatre “Going Up and Down” Georgia Benkart, University of Wisconsin – Madison 2:45—3:10 Break & refreshments Lobby Area, Student Union 3:10—4:05 Retiring President’s address: Student Union Theatre “Some Thoughts on Rings and Things” Dwight Olson, John Carroll University 4:20—6:15 Contributed p aper sessions College of Arts and Sciences Bldg (CAS) 4:20—6:15 Special session on Applied Mathematics CAS 4:20—6:15 Executive Committee Meeting CAS 124 Conference Room 6:15—6:45 Social Time Martin University Center (Fir Street) 6:45—8:00 Banquet Martin University Center (Fir Street) 6:15—8:00 Student Pizza Party CAS Atrium and nearby rooms 8:00—8:45 After-dinner talk: Martin University Center (Fir Street) “Developing an undergraduate research program” Tom Price, The University of Akron 8:45 Business meeting
    [Show full text]
  • Algebra & Number Theory Vol. 7 (2013)
    Algebra & Number Theory Volume 7 2013 No. 3 msp Algebra & Number Theory msp.org/ant EDITORS MANAGING EDITOR EDITORIAL BOARD CHAIR Bjorn Poonen David Eisenbud Massachusetts Institute of Technology University of California Cambridge, USA Berkeley, USA BOARD OF EDITORS Georgia Benkart University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA Susan Montgomery University of Southern California, USA Dave Benson University of Aberdeen, Scotland Shigefumi Mori RIMS, Kyoto University, Japan Richard E. Borcherds University of California, Berkeley, USA Raman Parimala Emory University, USA John H. Coates University of Cambridge, UK Jonathan Pila University of Oxford, UK J-L. Colliot-Thélène CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, France Victor Reiner University of Minnesota, USA Brian D. Conrad University of Michigan, USA Karl Rubin University of California, Irvine, USA Hélène Esnault Freie Universität Berlin, Germany Peter Sarnak Princeton University, USA Hubert Flenner Ruhr-Universität, Germany Joseph H. Silverman Brown University, USA Edward Frenkel University of California, Berkeley, USA Michael Singer North Carolina State University, USA Andrew Granville Université de Montréal, Canada Vasudevan Srinivas Tata Inst. of Fund. Research, India Joseph Gubeladze San Francisco State University, USA J. Toby Stafford University of Michigan, USA Ehud Hrushovski Hebrew University, Israel Bernd Sturmfels University of California, Berkeley, USA Craig Huneke University of Virginia, USA Richard Taylor Harvard University, USA Mikhail Kapranov Yale University, USA Ravi Vakil Stanford University,
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013
    Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013 AMS Short Course on Random Matrices, Part Monday, January 7 I MAA Short Course on Conceptual Climate Models, Part I 9:00 AM –3:45PM Room 4, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center 8:30 AM –5:30PM Room 5B, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center Organizer: Van Vu,YaleUniversity Organizers: Esther Widiasih,University of Arizona 8:00AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Mary Lou Zeeman,Bowdoin upper level. College 9:00AM Random Matrices: The Universality James Walsh, Oberlin (5) phenomenon for Wigner ensemble. College Preliminary report. 7:30AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Terence Tao, University of California Los upper level. Angles 8:30AM Zero-dimensional energy balance models. 10:45AM Universality of random matrices and (1) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University (6) Dyson Brownian Motion. Preliminary 10:30AM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy report. (2) balance models, I. Laszlo Erdos, LMU, Munich Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 2:30PM Free probability and Random matrices. Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota (7) Preliminary report. Alice Guionnet, Massachusetts Institute 2:00PM One-dimensional energy balance models. of Technology (3) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University 4:00PM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy NSF-EHR Grant Proposal Writing Workshop (4) balance models, II. Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 3:00 PM –6:00PM Marina Ballroom Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota F, 3rd Floor, Marriott The time limit for each AMS contributed paper in the sessions meeting will be found in Volume 34, Issue 1 of Abstracts is ten minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • AMS Council Minutes
    American Mathematical Society Council Minutes Chicago, Illinois 24 April 2010 at noon Prepared 13 May 2010 Abstract The Council of the Society met at noon on Saturday, 24 April 2010, in the Chicago Room of the Chicago O’Hare Hilton Hotel, O’Hare International Airport, Chicago, IL, 60666.These are the minutes of that meeting. Although some items were treated in Executive Session, all actions taken are reported in these minutes. Council Minutes 24 April 2010 Page 5 I. MINUTES 1. Call to Order 1.1. Opening of the Meeting and Introductions AMS President George Andrews called the meeting to order promptly at noon, CDT, and presided throughout. He asked those present to introduce themselves. Other Council members present were: Alejandro Adem, Georgia Benkart, Sylvain E. Cappell, Ralph L. Cohen, Robert J. Daverman, John M. Franks, Eric M. Friedlander, Robert Guralnick, Richard Hain, Bryna Kra, William A. Massey, Frank Morgan, Jennifer Schultens, Chi-Wang Shu, Joseph H. Silverman, Ronald M. Solomon, Panagiotis E. Souganidis, Janet Talvacchia, Christophe Thiele, Michelle L. Wachs, Steven H. Weintraub, Sarah J. Witherspoon, and David Wright. Other interested parties and guests were: Sandy Golden (Administrative Assistant, AMS Secretary), Sheldon H. Katz (Chair, AMS Nominating Committee), Ellen Maycock (AMS Associate Executive Director), Donald McClure (AMS Executive Director), and Ronald J. Stern (AMS Board of Trustees). Steven Weintraub was the voting Associate Secretary. 1.2. 2009 Elections and More Newly elected or appointed members of the Council took office on 01 February 2010, and they are: President Elect Eric Friedlander Vice President: Sylvain Cappell Members at Large Alejandro Adem Richard Hain Jennifer Schultens Janet Talvacchia Christophe Thiele Math Reviews Editorial Committee Chair Ronald M.
    [Show full text]
  • Algebra & Number Theory
    Algebra & Number Theory Volume 4 2010 No. 2 mathematical sciences publishers Algebra & Number Theory www.jant.org EDITORS MANAGING EDITOR EDITORIAL BOARD CHAIR Bjorn Poonen David Eisenbud Massachusetts Institute of Technology University of California Cambridge, USA Berkeley, USA BOARD OF EDITORS Georgia Benkart University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA Susan Montgomery University of Southern California, USA Dave Benson University of Aberdeen, Scotland Shigefumi Mori RIMS, Kyoto University, Japan Richard E. Borcherds University of California, Berkeley, USA Andrei Okounkov Princeton University, USA John H. Coates University of Cambridge, UK Raman Parimala Emory University, USA J-L. Colliot-Thel´ ene` CNRS, Universite´ Paris-Sud, France Victor Reiner University of Minnesota, USA Brian D. Conrad University of Michigan, USA Karl Rubin University of California, Irvine, USA Hel´ ene` Esnault Universitat¨ Duisburg-Essen, Germany Peter Sarnak Princeton University, USA Hubert Flenner Ruhr-Universitat,¨ Germany Michael Singer North Carolina State University, USA Edward Frenkel University of California, Berkeley, USA Ronald Solomon Ohio State University, USA Andrew Granville Universite´ de Montreal,´ Canada Vasudevan Srinivas Tata Inst. of Fund. Research, India Joseph Gubeladze San Francisco State University, USA J. Toby Stafford University of Michigan, USA Ehud Hrushovski Hebrew University, Israel Bernd Sturmfels University of California, Berkeley, USA Craig Huneke University of Kansas, USA Richard Taylor Harvard University, USA Mikhail Kapranov Yale
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics People
    NEWS Mathematics People “In 1972, Rainer Weiss wrote down in an MIT report his Weiss, Barish, and ideas for building a laser interferometer that could detect Thorne Awarded gravitational waves. He had thought this through carefully and described in detail the physics and design of such an Nobel Prize in Physics instrument. This is typically called the ‘birth of LIGO.’ Rai Weiss’s vision, his incredible insights into the science and The Royal Swedish Academy of Sci- challenges of building such an instrument were absolutely ences has awarded the 2017 Nobel crucial to make out of his original idea the successful Prize in Physics to Rainer Weiss, experiment that LIGO has become. Barry C. Barish, and Kip S. Thorne, “Kip Thorne has done a wealth of theoretical work in all of the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration, general relativity and astrophysics, in particular connected for their “decisive contributions to with gravitational waves. In 1975, a meeting between the LIGO detector and the observa- Rainer Weiss and Kip Thorne from Caltech marked the tion of gravitational waves.” Weiss beginning of the complicated endeavors to build a gravi- receives one-half of the prize; Barish tational wave detector. Rai Weiss’s incredible insights into and Thorne share one-half. the science and challenges of building such an instrument Rainer Weiss combined with Kip Thorne’s theoretical expertise with According to the prize citation, gravitational waves, as well as his broad connectedness “LIGO, the Laser Interferometer with several areas of physics and funding agencies, set Gravitational-Wave Observatory, is the path toward a larger collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 September-October Newsletter
    Newsletter VOLUME 51, NO. 5 • SEPTEMBER–OCTOBER 2021 PRESIDENT’S REPORT This is a fun report to write, where I can share news of AWM’s recent award recognitions. Sometimes hearing about the accomplishments of others can make The purpose of the Association for Women in Mathematics is us feel like we are not good enough. I hope that we can instead feel inspired by the work these people have produced and energized to continue the good work we • to encourage women and girls to ourselves are doing. study and to have active careers in the mathematical sciences, and We’ve honored exemplary Student Chapters. Virginia Tech received the • to promote equal opportunity and award for Scientific Achievement for offering three different research-focused the equal treatment of women and programs during a pandemic year. UC San Diego received the award for Professional girls in the mathematical sciences. Development for offering multiple events related to recruitment and success in the mathematical sciences. Kutztown University received the award for Com- munity Engagement for a series of events making math accessible to a broad community. Finally, Rutgers University received the Fundraising award for their creative fundraising ideas. Congratulations to all your members! AWM is grateful for your work to support our mission. The AWM Research Awards honor excellence in specific research areas. Yaiza Canzani was selected for the AWM-Sadosky Research Prize in Analysis for her work in spectral geometry. Jennifer Balakrishnan was selected for the AWM- Microsoft Research Prize in Algebra and Number Theory for her work in computa- tional number theory.
    [Show full text]
  • From Algebras to Varieties
    F EATURE Principal Investigator Alexey Bondal Research Area：Mathematics From Algebras to Varieties geometry of varieties superlatively developed by Derived categories after Grothendieck Italian school of the late 19th and early 20th century. Both groups had very strong representatives, but Homological algebra is considered by they had scarce overlap in research. mathematicians to be one of the most formal Perhaps, one of the reasons for this strange state subjects within mathematics. Its formal austerity of affairs was a side effect of the great achievement requires a lot of efforts to come through basic of one of the best Grothendieck’s students, Pierre denitions and frightens off many of those who Deligne, who used complicated homological algebra starts studying the subject. This high level of to prove Weil conjectures. These conjectures are, formality of the theory gives an impression that it probably, more of arithmetic nature and do not is a ding an sich, something that has no possible have so much to do with geometry of algebraic way of comprehension for outsiders and efforts for varieties in the classical sense of Italian school. learning the theory would never be paid back. For years, applications of derived categories were After Alexander Grothendieck, the great creator developed rather in the area of number theoretical of modern homological algebra who introduced the and topological aspects of varieties and, later, in concept of derived categories, had left the stage Representation Theory than in classical geometry of where he occupied a central place for decades, the varieties. opinion that the homological theory had reached its bounds and become a useless formal theory Associative algebras was widely spread in the mathematical community.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Math/0202284V1 [Math.RA] 26 Feb 2002 (∆G1) (∆G3) (∆G2) 1 Ento 1.1
    LIE SUPERALGEBRAS GRADED BY THE ROOT SYSTEM A(m,n) Georgia Benkart1 Alberto Elduque2 February 25, 2002 Abstract. We determine the Lie superalgebras that are graded by the root systems of the basic classical simple Lie superalgebras of type A(m, n). §1. Introduction Our investigation is a natural extension of work on the problem of classifying Lie algebras graded by finite root systems. Many important classes of Lie algebras such as the affine and toroidal Lie algebras and various generalizations of them, such as the intersection matrix Lie algebras of Slodowy [S], which arise in the study of singularities, or the extended affine Lie algebras of [AABGP], exhibit a grading by a finite (possibly nonreduced) root system ∆. The formal definition, as first given by Berman and Moody in [BM], depends on a finite-dimensional split simple Lie algebra g over a field F of characteristic zero having a root space decomposition g = h ⊕ µ∈∆ gµ relative to a split Cartan subalgebra h. Such a Lie algebra g is an analogue over F of a finite-dimensional complex simple Lie algebra. L Definition 1.1. A Lie algebra L over F is graded by the (reduced) root system ∆ or is ∆-graded if arXiv:math/0202284v1 [math.RA] 26 Feb 2002 (∆G1) L contains as a subalgebra a finite-dimensional split simple Lie algebra g = h ⊕ µ∈∆ gµ whose root system is ∆ relative to a split Cartan subalgebra h = g0; L (∆G2) L = µ∈∆∪{0} Lµ, where Lµ = {x ∈ L | [h, x] = µ(h)x for all h ∈ h} for µ ∈ ∆ ∪{0}; and L (∆G3) L0 = µ∈∆[Lµ,L−µ].
    [Show full text]
  • Officers and Committee Members AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY
    Officers and Committee Members Numbers to the left of headings are used as points of reference 1.1. Liaison Committee in an index to AMS committees which follows this listing. Primary and secondary headings are: All members of this committee serve ex officio. Chair George E. Andrews 1. Officers John B. Conway 1.1. Liaison Committee Robert J. Daverman 2. Council John M. Franks 2.1. Executive Committee of the Council 3. Board of Trustees 4. Committees 4.1. Committees of the Council 4.2. Editorial Committees 2. Council 4.3. Committees of the Board of Trustees 4.4. Committees of the Executive Committee and Board of 2.0.1. Officers of the AMS Trustees President George E. Andrews 2010 4.5. Internal Organization of the AMS Immediate Past President 4.6. Program and Meetings James G. Glimm 2009 Vice President Robert L. Bryant 2009 4.7. Status of the Profession Frank Morgan 2010 4.8. Prizes and Awards Bernd Sturmfels 2010 4.9. Institutes and Symposia Secretary Robert J. Daverman 2010 4.10. Joint Committees Associate Secretaries* Susan J. Friedlander 2009 5. Representatives Michel L. Lapidus 2009 6. Index Matthew Miller 2010 Terms of members expire on January 31 following the year given Steven Weintraub 2010 unless otherwise specified. Treasurer John M. Franks 2010 Associate Treasurer Linda Keen 2010 2.0.2. Representatives of Committees 1. Officers Bulletin Susan J. Friedlander 2011 Colloquium Paul J. Sally, Jr. 2011 President George E. Andrews 2010 Executive Committee Sylvain E. Cappell 2009 Immediate Past President Journal of the AMS Karl Rubin 2013 James G.
    [Show full text]
  • Monica Vazirani CURRICULUM VITAE
    Monica Vazirani CURRICULUM VITAE Monica Vazirani cell phone: (510) 364-2486 Department of Mathematics office phone: (530) 554-2596 UC Davis fax: (530) 752-6635 One Shields Ave [email protected] Davis, CA 95616-8633 http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~vazirani USA citizenship: USA Education A.B. Harvard, May 1993, supervised by Nantel Bergeron; Summa Cum Laude with highest honors in Mathematics Ph.D. University of California (UC) Berkeley, May 1999, supervised by I. Grojnowski and T.Y. Lam Academic Positions National Science Foundation Mathematical Sciences Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, host in- stitutions: UC Berkeley, Fall 2000, 2001-2002; UC San Diego, Fall 1999, Spring 2001 Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI) Postdoc, Spring 2000 California Institute of Technology, Olga Taussky-John Todd Instructor in Mathematics, 2002-2003 Visiting position: MSRI member, Berkeley, California, Winter 2008 University of California Davis Department of Mathematics, Associate Professor, July 2006-present; Assistant Professor, July 2002-2006 (on leave 2002-2003) Research Interests Combinatorial representation theory, , Hecke algebras, crystal graphs, quantum groups, Khovanov- Lauda-Rouquier algebras, categorification Academic Honors and Grants John Harvard Scholarship for Academic Achievement, 1990{93 TRW Space & Technology Group Affirmative Action Scholar, 1991 National Science Foundation Incentives for Excellence Scholarship Prize, 1992 Phi Beta Kappa, 1993 Eugene Cota-Robles Fellowship, 1993{94 National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 May-June
    Newsletter VOLUME 51, NO. 3 • MAY–JUNE 2021 PRESIDENT’S REPORT I wrote my report for the previous newsletter in January after the attack on the US Capitol. This newsletter, I write my report in March after the murder of eight people, including six Asian-American women, in Atlanta. I find myself The purpose of the Association for Women in Mathematics is wondering when I will write a report with no acts of hatred fresh in my mind, but then I remember that acts like these are now common in the US. We react to each • to encourage women and girls to one as a unique horror, too easily forgetting the long string of horrors preceding it. study and to have active careers in the mathematical sciences, and In fact, in the time between the first and final drafts of this report, another shooting • to promote equal opportunity and has taken place, this time in Boulder, CO. Even worse, seven mass shootings have the equal treatment of women and taken place in the past seven days.1 Only two of these have received national girls in the mathematical sciences. attention. Meanwhile, it was only a few months ago in December that someone bombed a block in Nashville. We are no longer discussing that trauma. Many of these events of recent months and years have been fomented by internet communities that foster racism, sexism, and white male supremacy. As the work of Safiya Noble details beautifully, tech giants play a major role in the creation, growth, and support of these communities.
    [Show full text]