Channel 4’S Response March 2021 Big Debate Channel 4 Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Channel 4’S Response March 2021 Big Debate Channel 4 Contents Small Screen The Future of Public Service Media Channel 4’s response March 2021 Big Debate Channel 4 Contents Foreword 2 Question 3 What do you think should be included in the PSM ‘offer’? 25 Summary of recommendations 3 Question 4 What options do you think we should consider on the terms of PSM availability? 27 Introduction 4 1. Public service broadcasting has never been more Question 5 important, culturally or economically 4 What are the options for future funding of PSM and are there lessons we can learn from other countries’ approaches? 28 Case study Gogglebox 7 Question 6 What do you think about the opportunities for Case study collaboration we have referred to? Are there other It’s A Sin 8 opportunities or barriers we haven’t identified? 34 2. Channel 4 plays a unique role for the British public Question 7 and British creative industries 10 What are your views on the opportunities for new providers of PSM? 37 Case study Yinka Bokinni 12 Case study Joe Lycett’s Got Your Back 40 Case study Hollyoaks 14 Case study 3. Our 4 All the UK strategy sees Channel 4 take Grayson’s Art Club 41 a leading role ‘levelling up’ the media and creative economy in the UK 15 Question 8 Given changes to audience consumption patterns 4. Channel 4 is transitioning to a digital future and wider market developments, is there any aspect with its Future4 strategy 18 of Ofcom’s Guidance on commissioning of independent productions which Ofcom should update to ensure 5. Regulatory intervention must be modernised it remains fit-for purpose? urgently to reflect technological change and 42 structural power shifts 19 Question 9 Is there any change to the independent production quota which Ofcom should recommend to Government Consultation questions as part of its ‘Small Screen Big Debate’ programme? 46 Response to consultation questions 20 Question 10 Question 1 Do you have any recommendations for potential changes Do you agree that a new regulatory framework for PSM to the definitions of ‘qualifying programmes’ or delivery should support a more flexible ‘service neutral’ ‘independent production’ which Ofcom should delivery approach that is more outcomes focused? 21 recommend to Government as part of its ‘Small Screen Big Debate’ programme? 47 Case study Channel 4 News 23 Question 2 Do you agree with our proposals for a clear accountability framework? 24 1 Channel 4 Foreword When I was 19 years old, I sat and watched the very first night of Channel 4 as it beamed out into the world. Brookside. Walter. The Comic Strip. What a night! Immediately, programmes with a style and content that felt new, tough, young, funny, risky and brave. In the space of one night, I could feel a distinct and powerful change. Seventeen years later, the channel changed my life. In 1999, Of course, we’re British. We’d rather apologise than boast. it broadcast Queer As Folk, a programme which confirmed But here, in this industry, right now, I have to make a stand and my hope that original work could be done, that I was capable be proud. I’ve spent a lifetime working in and promoting PSB, of finding a voice in this industry, that minority voices could and I’m more certain than ever that these voices are needed. become the mainstream. It set me on a path which has lasted Breaking the silence. Shining a light. Showing us the new, and until today. 22 years after that, I launched It’s A Sin on Channel showing us the old through new eyes. This form of broadcasting 4, and I’m now receiving emails, texts and DMs daily, telling me is one of Britain’s greatest traditions, and I’m so excited to see how lives have changed as a result of the show. Families now what it can achieve in the years to come. able to tell the truth about how their uncle died; men and women freely stating their HIV status out loud, for the first time, without Russell T Davies shame; charities telling me that HIV testing numbers have gone 11 March 2021 through the roof. £300,000 for charity has been raised from the sale of a single t-shirt design, based on the show’s catchphrase. That, to me, is public service broadcasting. Far more than a service. It’s a joy. I’ve done my best over the years, to recognise my responsibilities within broadcasting, and to use that authority well, I hope. (Aided and abetted by thousands of others, in case I make myself the hero of my own story!) Under Jane Tranter’s leadership, I took Doctor Who to Cardiff, which helped to revolutionise the Welsh film and TV industry. And working with Nicola Shindler, we’ve seen the Northern production centre go from strength to strength. And always, always, lives change. Lives are changed by television. I’ve seen it happen. These shows create ambitions, they foster dreams in the young, they use age-old skills and broadcast them in shows that are seen around the world. I often think, when we talk about a show’s budget, it sounds like the money is spent on champagne. But the money is spent on jobs. On people. On lives. As well as the dreamers, like the actors, writers and designers, it pays the riggers and drivers and hotels and caterers, the electricians and the carpenters and the accountants, security and secretaries, trainees and interns, hundreds of them for every show. The money goes out into the world and makes those lives better. I think we’ve seen the power of TV more than ever during the lockdown. We’ve all loved a good bit of telly in these strange days, but I think the PSB institutions in particular have provided a voice, a comfort, a debate, a challenge, even a friendship. Streamers will stream no matter what the weather; PSB loves to look at the world, and react, and help. The act of broadcasting with public service in mind creates a voice, an attitude, a dynamic, a drive, and a capacity to adapt, that simply does not exist in programmes created purely to be sold. 2 Channel 4 Summary of recommendations Channel 4 strongly supports Ofcom’s commitment to securing a robust public service media (PSM) framework for the future. To deliver this commitment, Channel 4 believes that Ofcom should: • Champion the value of national institutions in • Modernise the current quota system to give delivering significant long-term investment in flexibility over how PSM providers can best PSM content and infrastructure (e.g. skills, talent deliver programming commitments (for example, base, reaching young and diverse audiences), and by delivering news across digital and linear). ensure these institutions are the heart of any new Channel 4 is committed to maintaining its current PSM framework. Whilst we support sustainable remit and believes there will still be a role for provision of more PSM, it is vital that any benefits specific commitments that guarantee provision received by new providers of PSM are also of certain types of content that other matched by an appropriate level of obligations. broadcasters will not provide, such as news. Any future provision of PSM should also retain the • Acknowledge the imbalance of power between fundamental features of universal availability and UK PSBs and global digital platforms and free to air, which have been the cornerstone to the recommend that the relationship between success of the existing system. online platforms and PSBs is one of the • Urgently address the growing gap in PSM issues addressed in the ‘code of conduct’ prominence and risk of reduced availability recommended by the Competition & Markets by accepting the PSBs’ joint proposal on Authority (CMA), which is aimed at ensuring prominence, inclusion and fair value and platforms cannot abuse their market dominance. recommending that the Government legislate • Continue to encourage and enable PSB at the earliest opportunity. This would ensure collaboration so Channel 4 and the other PSBs a standardised regulated version of the PSB maintain scale in response to growing digital streaming players is offered for free to all major competition. This would include Ofcom support platforms, and ensure that these players were for PSB initiatives to future-proof free to air carried and made prominent on these platforms TV platforms. with built-in flexibility for platforms and PSBs to negotiate for anything beyond the standard • Identify ways to further support commercial regulated offer. broadcasters, including ensuring a level playing field with online providers in relation • Support the current funding model for PSM, with to advertising regulation and identifying its mix of public and commercial funding and opportunities to unlock further commercial funding universal, free to air provision. We call on Ofcom through reducing restrictions such as advertising to support Channel 4’s unique publicly-owned, minutage and product placement rules. not for profit business model. Channel 4 has a robust, resilient commercial funding model which • Endorse broadcasters updating their will remain driven primarily by advertising; and, as commissioning Codes of Practice to reflect highlighted by our Future4 strategy, Channel 4 is the wider set of rights needed to deliver PSM, well-placed to pivot its business model from linear including the central importance to broadcasters to digital advertising revenues, and to diversify its of VoD rights and an archive proposition. PSBs revenue beyond advertising. are now streaming services, and viewers expect to access streamed content from them as standard. A clear steer from Ofcom could be provided by an update to the existing guidance that supports the Codes of Practice, or as part of Ofcom’s Statement on the future of public service media.
Recommended publications
  • Pay TV in Australia Markets and Mergers
    Pay TV in Australia Markets and Mergers Cento Veljanovski CASE ASSOCIATES Current Issues June 1999 Published by the Institute of Public Affairs ©1999 by Cento Veljanovski and Institute of Public Affairs Limited. All rights reserved. First published 1999 by Institute of Public Affairs Limited (Incorporated in the ACT)␣ A.C.N.␣ 008 627 727 Head Office: Level 2, 410 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia Phone: (03) 9600 4744 Fax: (03) 9602 4989 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ipa.org.au Veljanovski, Cento G. Pay TV in Australia: markets and mergers Bibliography ISBN 0 909536␣ 64␣ 3 1.␣ Competition—Australia.␣ 2.␣ Subscription television— Government policy—Australia.␣ 3.␣ Consolidation and merger of corporations—Government policy—Australia.␣ 4.␣ Trade regulation—Australia.␣ I.␣ Title.␣ (Series: Current Issues (Institute of Public Affairs (Australia))). 384.5550994 Opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily endorsed by the Institute of Public Affairs. Printed by Impact Print, 69–79 Fallon Street, Brunswick, Victoria 3056 Contents Preface v The Author vi Glossary vii Chapter One: Introduction 1 Chapter Two: The Pay TV Picture 9 More Choice and Diversity 9 Packaging and Pricing 10 Delivery 12 The Operators 13 Chapter Three: A Brief History 15 The Beginning 15 Satellite TV 19 The Race to Cable 20 Programming 22 The Battle with FTA Television 23 Pay TV Finances 24 Chapter Four: A Model of Dynamic Competition 27 The Basics 27 Competition and Programme Costs 28 Programming Choice 30 Competitive Pay TV Systems 31 Facilities-based
    [Show full text]
  • Media Nations 2019
    Media nations: UK 2019 Published 7 August 2019 Overview This is Ofcom’s second annual Media Nations report. It reviews key trends in the television and online video sectors as well as the radio and other audio sectors. Accompanying this narrative report is an interactive report which includes an extensive range of data. There are also separate reports for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. The Media Nations report is a reference publication for industry, policy makers, academics and consumers. This year’s publication is particularly important as it provides evidence to inform discussions around the future of public service broadcasting, supporting the nationwide forum which Ofcom launched in July 2019: Small Screen: Big Debate. We publish this report to support our regulatory goal to research markets and to remain at the forefront of technological understanding. It addresses the requirement to undertake and make public our consumer research (as set out in Sections 14 and 15 of the Communications Act 2003). It also meets the requirements on Ofcom under Section 358 of the Communications Act 2003 to publish an annual factual and statistical report on the TV and radio sector. This year we have structured the findings into four chapters. • The total video chapter looks at trends across all types of video including traditional broadcast TV, video-on-demand services and online video. • In the second chapter, we take a deeper look at public service broadcasting and some wider aspects of broadcast TV. • The third chapter is about online video. This is where we examine in greater depth subscription video on demand and YouTube.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel 4 - a Change of Ownership?
    By John Woodhouse 15 September 2021 Channel 4 - a change of ownership? Summary 1 Background 2 Further reading commonslibrary.parliament.uk Number 9280 Channel 4 - a change of ownership? Contributing Authors Maria Lalic Image Credits Channel 4 building by Tom Morris. Licensed by CC BY-SA 3.0 Disclaimer The Commons Library does not intend the information in our research publications and briefings to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. We have published it to support the work of MPs. You should not rely upon it as legal or professional advice, or as a substitute for it. We do not accept any liability whatsoever for any errors, omissions or misstatements contained herein. You should consult a suitably qualified professional if you require specific advice or information. Read our briefing ‘Legal help: where to go and how to pay’ for further information about sources of legal advice and help. This information is provided subject to the conditions of the Open Parliament Licence. Feedback Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in these publicly available briefings is correct at the time of publication. Readers should be aware however that briefings are not necessarily updated to reflect subsequent changes. If you have any comments on our briefings please email [email protected]. Please note that authors are not always able to engage in discussions with members of the public who express opinions about the content of our research, although we will carefully consider and correct any factual errors. You can read our feedback and complaints policy and our editorial policy at commonslibrary.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement: Ofcom's Plan of Work 2021/22
    Ofcom’s plan of work 2021/22 Making communications work for everyone Ofcom’s plan of work 2021/22 – Welsh translation STATEMENT: Publication Date: 26 March 2021 Contents Section 1. Chief Executive’s foreword 1 2. Overview 3 3. Our goals and priorities for 2021/22 9 4. Delivering good outcomes for consumers across the UK 31 Annex A1. What we do 37 A2. Project work for 2021/2022 39 Plan of Work 2021/22 1. Chief Executive’s foreword Ofcom is the UK’s communications regulator, with a mission to make communications work for everyone. We serve the interests of consumers and businesses across the UK’s nations and regions, through our work in mobile and fixed telecoms, broadcasting, spectrum, post and online services. Over the past year we have learned that being connected is everything. High-quality, reliable communications services have never mattered more to people’s lives. But as consumers shift their habits increasingly online, our communications sectors are transforming fast. It is an exciting moment for our industries and for Ofcom as a regulator - it requires long-term focus alongside speed and agility in response to change. Against this backdrop our statement sets out our detailed goals for the coming financial year, and how we plan to achieve them. On telecoms, Ofcom has just confirmed a new long-term framework for investment in gigabit- capable fixed networks. In the coming year, we will shift our focus to support delivery against this programme, alongside investment and innovation in 5G and new mobile infrastructure. Following legislation in Parliament, we will put in place new rules to hold operators to account for the security and resilience of their networks.
    [Show full text]
  • ITV Plc Final Results 2007
    ITV plc Final Results 2007 5th March 2008 1 Introduction Michael Grade Executive Chairman 2 Agenda Introduction Financial and operating review Current trading and strategy update 3 Overview 2007 financial results Total revenue £2,082m (2006: £2,181m) Operating EBITA £311m (2006: £375m) Impacted by legacy issues and digital investment 2007 operational and strategic progress ITV viewing increased year-on-year for first time in over a decade ITV NAR stabilised at £1,489m (2006: £1,494m) Strengthened management team appointed Strategic plan and targets announced 2008 current trading ITV outperforming market in revenues and ratings Î Turnaround plan on track 4 Board and management changes Executive Chairman term extended to four years and end of 2010 John Cresswell becomes dedicated COO, with new FD to be appointed Dawn Airey and Rupert Howell join plc Board Peter Fincham to join as ITV Director of Television 5 Financial and operating review John Cresswell Chief Operating Officer 6 Final Results 12 months to 31st Dec - £m 2007 2006 Change Published Published % Revenue 2,082 2,181 (5) Operating EBITA 311 375 (17) Amortisation Normal (56) (56) CSA Impairment (28) (20) Exceptional items inc gains on sales (9) 4 Associates, JVs and investment income 3 11 Profit before interest and tax 221 314 (30) Interest (33) (26) 27 Profit before tax 188 288 (35) 7 Final Results 12 months to 31st Dec - £m 2007 2006 Change Published Published % Profit before tax 188 288 (35) Tax (50) (66) (24) Profit after tax 138 222 (38) Minority interests (1)
    [Show full text]
  • New Series of a Place to Call Home for Foxtel
    Seven confirms new series of A Place To Call Home for Foxtel Commissioning builds on Seven’s momentum in creation of new content in Australian and international markets The Seven Network – Australia’s most-watched broadcast television platform and a key business of Seven West Media, one of Australia’s leading integrated media and content creation companies - today confirmed the signing of an agreement with Foxtel for a new series of Seven Productions’ A Place To Call Home. This will be the fifth series for A Place To Call Home. A Place To Call Home and Home and Away are two of Seven Productions’ most successful drama series seen around the world. My Kitchen Rules – another Seven Productions creation – is seen in 160 territories and will launch a “local version” next January in primetime on FOX, one of the “big four” networks in the United States. My Kitchen Rules has also recently launched on Channel 4 in the United Kingdom. These significant commissions signal Seven’s next move in its long-term strategy in the development and creation of market-leading content. Commenting, Therese Hegarty, Seven’s Director of Content Distribution and Rights said: “We take great pride in A Place To Call Home. It is a clear indication of the future for Seven Productions. We are now creating more content than at any time in our history and expanding our presence in international content production. We look forward to further dramatically expanding our content creation and production over the coming twelve months.” Commenting, Julie McGuaran, Head of Drama for Seven, said: “All of us at Seven Productions are delighted to take A Place To Call Home to a new series.
    [Show full text]
  • BBC Trust’S Review of BBC Services for Younger Audiences
    Channel 4 submission to the BBC Trust’s review of BBC services for younger audiences 1. Channel 4 welcomes the opportunity to provide its views to the BBC Trust’s review of BBC services for younger audiences. Channel 4 is a publicly-owned, commercially-funded public service broadcaster. Its core public service channel, Channel 4, is a free-to-air service funded predominantly by advertising. Unlike the other commercially-funded public service broadcasters, Channel 4 is not shareholder owned: commercial revenue is only a means to delivering Channel 4’s public purpose end and any surplus revenues are reinvested in the delivery of its public service remit. 2. In recent years, Channel 4 has broadened its portfolio to offer a range of digital services, including the free-to-air, commercially-funded digital television channels Channel 4+1, E4, E4+1, Film4, More4 and 4Music. Channel 4 also offers a video on demand service, 4oD, and it is expanding its range of services at channel4.com. In addition, Channel 4 offers a range of online education projects for 14 to 19 year olds and has launched an innovation pilot fund, 4iP, which seeks to stimulate whole new digital media services across a range of areas, including video games, the arts, democracy and sport. 3. These innovations have allowed Channel 4 to stay in touch with audiences— especially younger viewers—who are rapidly migrating to digital media. Ever since its launch in 1982, Channel 4’s brand has resonated particularly strongly with teenagers and younger adults, and the organisation speaks with an authenticity of voice which is not easily replicated by other public institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Television Transmitters: Pre-Switchover Network
    Digital Television Transmitters: pre-switchover network This leaflet provides details of the Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) transmitters which have not yet switched over to fully-digital operation (the 'low power' DTT network). Detailed information on post-switchover transmitter characteristics is available on the Ofcom website at www.ofcom.org.uk. Transmitters are grouped according to the ITV1 region that they broadcast, which will determine each transmitter's place in the digital switchover sequence. Details of the programme services carried in each multiplex are available on the Digital Television Group's website, www.dtg.org.uk/retailer. While this information is believed to be correct at the time of preparation, changes to the DTT network will occur, particularly as more transmitters switch to digital. For the latest information, please see the Ofcom website, www.ofcom.org.uk, or Digital UK's website, www.digitaluk.co.uk. Multiplex 1 Multiplex 2 Multiplex A Multiplex B Multiplex C Multiplex D Multiplex 1 Multiplex 2 Multiplex A Multiplex B Multiplex C Multiplex D BBC Digital 3&4 SDN BBC Arqiva Arqiva BBC Digital 3&4 SDN BBC Arqiva Arqiva Avg. Avg. Aerial ERP ERP ERP ERP ERP ERP Aerial ERP ERP ERP ERP ERP ERP Site Name NGR Aerial Site Name NGR Aerial Group (kW) (kW) (kW) (kW) (kW) (kW) Group (kW) (kW) (kW) (kW) (kW) (kW) Offset Offset Offset Offset Offset Offset Offset Offset Offset Offset Offset Height Offset Height Channel Channel Channel Channel Channel Channel Channel Channel Channel Channel Channel Channel Anglia Tyne Tees
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing the Line Between News and the Business of News: Exploring Journalists' Use of Twitter Jukes, Stephen
    www.ssoar.info Crossing the line between news and the business of news: exploring journalists' use of Twitter Jukes, Stephen Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Jukes, S. (2019). Crossing the line between news and the business of news: exploring journalists' use of Twitter. Media and Communication, 7(1), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1772 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183–2439) 2019, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 248–258 DOI: 10.17645/mac.v7i1.1772 Article Crossing the Line between News and the Business of News: Exploring Journalists’ Use of Twitter Stephen Jukes Faculty of Media and Communication, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 7 September 2018 | Accepted: 4 January 2018 | Published: 21 March 2019 Abstract Anglo-American journalism has typically drawn a firm dividing line between those who report the news and those who run the business of news. This boundary, often referred to in the West as a ‘Chinese Wall’, is designed to uphold the inde- pendence of journalists from commercial interests or the whims of news proprietors. But does this separation still exist in today’s age of social media and at a time when news revenues are under unprecedented pressure? This article focuses on Twitter, now a widely used tool in the newsroom, analysing the Twitter output of 10 UK political correspondents during the busy party conference season.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching Digital on Screen Graphics Executive Sum M Ary
    Researching Digital On Screen Graphics Executive Sum m ary Background In Spring 2010, the BBC commissioned independent market research company, Ipsos MediaCT to conduct research into what the general public, across the UK thought of Digital On Screen Graphics (DOGs) – the channel logos that are often in the corner of the TV screen. The research was conducted between 5th and 11th March, with a representative sample of 1,031 adults aged 15+. The research was conducted by interviewers in-home, using the Ipsos MORI Omnibus. The key findings from the research can be found below. Key Findings Do viewers notice DOGs? As one of our first questions we split our sample into random halves and showed both halves a typical image that they would see on TV. One was a very busy image, with a DOG present in the top left corner, the other image had much less going on, again with the DOG in the top left corner. We asked respondents what the first thing they noticed was, and then we asked what they second thing they noticed was. It was clear from the results that the DOGs did not tend to stand out on screen, with only 12% of those presented with the ‘less busy’ screen picking out the DOG (and even fewer, 7%, amongst those who saw the busy screen). Even when we had pointed out DOGs and talked to respondents specifically about them, 59% agreed that they ‘tend not to notice the logos’, with females and viewers over 55, the least likely to notice them according to our survey.
    [Show full text]
  • S4C's Response to the Future Pricing of Spectrum Used for Terrestrial Broadcasting Consultation Introduction S4C Is a Statutor
    S4C’s Response to the Future pricing of spectrum used for terrestrial broadcasting Consultation Introduction S4C is a statutory corporation originally established under the Broadcasting Act 1981 and now regulated by the Communications Act 2003 and the Broadcasting Act s1990 and 1996. S4C (Sianel Pedwar Cymru – the Welsh Fourth Channel, www.s4c.co.uk) was established to provide a broad range of high quality and diverse programming in which a substantial proportion of the programmes shown are in Welsh. S4C currently broadcasts S4C on analogue, S4C Digidol and S4C2 on the digital platforms and the best of its content on broadband. On S4C analogue S4C broadcasts the best of Channel 4. S4C has a crucial role to play in providing entertainment and news through the Welsh language throughout Wales and beyond via its services. S4C is uniquely funded through a mixture of grant in aid and advertising and commercial revenue. It has an annual turnover of just over £95 million, and receives some programming from the BBC. During 2005 £8m was spent on carriage costs. Like the other established public service broadcasters, S4C is having to manage the technological challenges of switchover and the rise of other new platforms and other technological development that will become the norm over the next 10 years. S4C Digidol (the Welsh language only service) and S4C2 are currently carried on capacity reserved for S4C on Mux A (50% of the capacity in Wales is reserved for use by S4C Companies). S4C has always operated in a manner that ensures that it utilises that which it requires and frees up the capacity to ensure most efficient use.
    [Show full text]
  • Children, Technology and Play
    Research report Children, technology and play Marsh, J., Murris, K., Ng’ambi, D., Parry, R., Scott, F., Thomsen, B.S., Bishop, J., Bannister, C., Dixon, K., Giorza, T., Peers, J., Titus, S., Da Silva, H., Doyle, G., Driscoll, A., Hall, L., Hetherington, A., Krönke, M., Margary, T., Morris, A., Nutbrown, B., Rashid, S., Santos, J., Scholey, E., Souza, L., and Woodgate, A. (2020) Children, Technology and Play. Billund, Denmark: The LEGO Foundation. June 2020 ISBN: 978-87-999589-7-9 Table of contents Table of contents Section 1: Background to the study • 4 1.1 Introduction • 4 1.2 Aims, objectives and research questions • 4 1.3 Methodology • 5 Section 2: South African and UK survey findings • 8 2.1 Children, technology and play: South African survey data analysis • 8 2.2 Children, technology and play: UK survey data analysis • 35 2.3 Summary • 54 Section 3: Pen portraits of case study families and children • 56 3.1 South African case study family profiles • 57 3.2 UK case study family profiles • 72 3.3 Summary • 85 Section 4: Children’s digital play ecologies • 88 4.1 Digital play ecologies • 88 4.2 Relationality and children’s digital ecologies • 100 4.3 Children’s reflections on digital play • 104 4.4 Summary • 115 Section 5: Digital play and learning • 116 5.1 Subject knowledge and understanding • 116 5.2 Digital skills • 119 5.3 Holistic skills • 120 5.4 Digital play in the classroom • 139 5.5 Summary • 142 2 Table of contents Section 6: The five characteristics of learning through play • 144 6.1 Joy • 144 6.2 Actively engaging • 148
    [Show full text]