Cox Enterprises, Inc., ) 12-Ml-02048-C Se
Case 5:12-ml-02048-C Document 372 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 88 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA IN RE: ) ) COX ENTERPRISES, INC., ) 12-ML-02048-C SET-TOP CABLE TELEVISION ) BOX ANTITRUST LITIGATION ) __________ Trial Docket ________________________________ ) This document relates to: ) ) Richard Healy, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Cox Communications, Inc., ) ) Defendant. ) ) AMENDED FINAL PRETRIAL REPORT All counsel who will appear at trial: Appearing for Plaintiff: Michael J. Blaschke, Esq., Rachel Lawrence Mor, Esq., Oklahoma City, OK; Allan Kanner, Esq., Cynthia St. Amant, Esq., New Orleans, LA; Todd M. Schneider, Esq., Jason Kim, Esq., San Francisco, CA; Joe R. Whatley, Jr., Esq., New York, NY; W. Tucker Brown, Esq., Birmingham, AL; and Henry C. Quillen, Esq., Portsmouth, NH. Appearing for Defendant: Margaret M. Zwisler, Washington, D.C.; Alfred C. Pfeiffer, Jr., Jason L. Daniels, San Francisco, CA; Jennifer L. Giordano, Allyson M. Maltas, Andrew J. Robinson, Katherine M. Cheng, Washington, D.C.; D. Kent Meyers, Molly H. Tolbert, Oklahoma City, OK. Jury Trial Demanded x - Non-Jury Trial □ 1 Case 5:12-ml-02048-C Document 372 Filed 09/24/15 Page 2 of 88 1. BRIEF PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. State briefly and in ordinary language the facts and positions of the parties (appropriate for use during jury selection in jury cases). This case is a class action alleging that Defendant Cox Communications, Inc. (“Cox”) violated United States and Oklahoma antitrust laws. The antitrust laws prohibit certain agreements that unreasonably restrain competition and allow those harmed by such arrangements to recover damages. A class action brings together the claims of many plaintiffs in a single lawsuit.
[Show full text]