Research on the Epitaph of the Southern Han Emperor Gaozu, with Discussion on the Royal Liu Family’S Ancestry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Research on the Epitaph of the Southern Han Emperor Gaozu, with Discussion on the Royal Liu Family’S Ancestry BIBLID 0254-4466(2008)26:2 pp. 285-316 યᗟᄃ੅ኢ 漢學研究第26卷第2 期(民國97年 6 月) ݖΊ͛ij҂ᛖޓݑ႔IJ੼য়͇࠱̂ ęęࣘᄲᆒͩАয়ҕ௚યᗟ 劉 文 鎖Ŏ ၡࢋ ݖΊ͛ij༫ĂඕЪݑ႔ѣᙯޓώ͛ಶ൫ࡉາ΍˿ݑ႔૵౗IJ੼য়͇࠱̂ Ϯ඾үү˘҂ᛖĂഇ၆੼য়ᆒ㓢˘ϠҖྫ̈́ݑ႔ΫѣܛΫफ़̈́୻΃ͽֽѣᙯ Ăᆒ㓢̝̖ਕăّଐᄃטݑ႔ᇁ̈́ޘטՀБࢬᒢྋĄٙኢΒ߁̣΃ݖă⺭Ί ᄃ͛טϠπְᖹĂΒ߁׎੠಴Аয়ᄃĶဇંķયᗟăĶΔᜪࣧ̚ķયᗟăᖃ Ј้Шăّଐᄃ̖ਕඈ͞ࢬĄТॡಶ૵౗IJݖΊܫăڒझ໒ࡿޙనăᎸޙ̼ ೀ࣎ࢦࢋ͞ࢬܑٙன΍ֽ۞পט᎝۞ԛޙ˯ͽ̈́੠಴Аয়યᗟăဪט͛ijԛ ள̝఍Ăಶᘼϣᖳˣٙኢݑ႔ᆒͩАয়ҕ௚યᗟ೩΍ႷཌྷĈIJݖΊ͛ij̚۞ ć˫ፂѣᙯཱྀڒ᎗೻ܧ׎छ୉̝Δֽ͞໚̈́ځЈ้ШĂܑܫ੠಴Аয়׶ᆒ㓢 Ϋफ़၆ᆒ̝ͩА͵ᚱరăؖЩֽ໚ăݑዏೀ࣎͞ࢬ۞ࢦາᑭ੅Ăଯീݑ႔ᆒ ࣫ϐᔖใᐌݑٺĂཱྀޢࡧęęщͩĶ˝ؖࡧķ̝ྥ۞઼̚اࠎ࣫΃ˢරؠͩ ٛܠϲ౷ፂᑏݑ۞ͳഈĂ׎ҕ௚̙ߏޙΑڠዏᇃэĂͽޢĂޙ჊اዏሗ߹ଁ ೻ཱྀĄگұٕ ઼˩ݖΊ͛ăᆒ㓢ăྥࡧặ΃ޓᙯᔣෟ Ĉݑ႔ă੼য়͇࠱̂ ˘ă݈ā֏ ҂Οࡁտٙд൫ࡉડາౄᗉۏ2003ѐ 6 ͡Ҍ2004ѐ 10͡มĂᇃэξ͛ 收稿日期:2006年11 月13日,通過刊登日期:2008年4月23日。 Ŏ 作者係廣州中山大學人類學系副教授。 285 286 漢學研究第 26 卷第 2 期 ܩफҘొ۞ΔٺဪĂ̶ҾҜވ቉ಛफĶ̂ጯݱķ̍гአߤ֭൴ଧ˞׌ळ᎑̈ ૯Ąགྷ൴ଧᙋ၁Ă఺׌ळဪ˘ळߏݑ႔੼য়ᆒ㓢Ğ917-942在ܦՅ̂ࢶ̋׶ ᆒᔳ۞ᇇ౗Ą1؟૯ğፂᄮࠎߏধܦՅ̂ࢶ̋ğĂΩ˘ळĞܩ位ğ۞૵౗ĞΔ ݖΊ͛ijϮ༫Ă߇Ξͽቁᄮဪޓ઎ܲхѣIJ੼য়͇࠱̰̂ܝ׎̚۞૵౗Яဪ ણ៍ĄЯࠎ၆ݑ႔઼Ϋ۞ض͹̶֗׶౗ဪّኳ൑ႷĄд൴ଧ༊̚Ăඊ۰അѣ ѣטᎸ኷Ă˫҂ᇋᇃэĶঔ˯කძ̝ྮķ҂ΟࡁտયᗟĂ྾၆༫͛̈́౗ဪԛ Ϋ۰ᔿڼពĂځٙࢦෛĄ९ݑ႔઼ΫĂΫ३̚ᔵѣ੃ྶĂҭ௖ரăઐᅲҌࠎ ࠎࢦෛ۞ࣧЯĂ׎̚༊ѣѩΫफ़̙֖۞યᗟĄΩγĂݑ႔઼ৣൺܳĂд࣫ă ԇ׌̂ͳഈ̝มĂ˵ధѣˠᄮࠎ·׎ณߏ˘߱࿅ഭ۞г͞Ϋć̙࿅Ăֶඊ۰ ࠻Ă׎ΫጯࡁտຍཌྷΞਕវனд׌࣎͞ࢬĈ˘ߏд઼̼͛̚۞॰ߛ˭Ă఺࣎ ൺᇶ҃፾ϲ۞ͳഈᄃࣧ̚۞ᙯܼć˟ߏιд̚γᙯܼΫ˯۞гҜĂְঘ࣫ă ۰ٙޢķ۞જၗયᗟĄމॾԊ۞ᖼݭͽ̈́ྥࡧăĶᏀـԇ̝ᅫ઼̚၆γϹ ĂٙࣅᏥ۞ߏ።Ϋ͛ᚥĂ҃ٽঘĂ࿅Νࡁտ̚ઐࢦ࣫ăԇ׌΃၆γϹ఼ᄃ෶ ࡁտͽ᎚ീ̼͛ΫăۤົΫ۞ࢬᄻĂ͍׎ߏˢරᏀથ۞ۏ఼࿅҂Ο᏷ྫă᏷ ฟण۞ᅳાĄಶݑ႔Ϋफ़યᗟ҃֏Ă୻ޞإဋϔ۞̼͛ᄃۤົϠ߿Ăߏމࡧ Ăۏݑ႔۞᏷ྫă᏷ٺ఼Ԡįඈ඾ү̚Ă඾ᐂѣ˘ొ̶ᛳڌϮጯ̈́Įᇃܛ΃ ΐ˯ன΃҂Ο̍үٙᒔ଀۞ဪཨ׶༫ڍिćтܫ׎̚Β߁IJ૵౗༫ij۞ᖎர फ़Ă̏Ξͽಶࡶ̒યᗟणฟ੅ኢĄனݑ႔˟౗۞າྤफ़̏གྷ̳οĂ၆ݑྤג ֏Ąώ͛ॲፂ׎ޞ႔઼Ϋ׶ݑ႔҂Ο۞ࡁտֽᓾĂౌߏІ஽ְĂ׎ຍཌྷҋ̙ ݖΊ͛ijү˘҂ᛖĂ֭ಶΫफ़̈́IJݖΊޓ൴ଧಡӘĂྏ၆૵౗IJ੼য়͇࠱̂ ඈቢ৶Ă၆ᘼϣᖳˣٙኢݑ႔ᆒͩয়Аҕ௚યᗟග̟੅ኢĂͽט͛ijăဪཨԛ ᙊ۰ĄٺՐϒ ăIJݖΊ͛ijᐂ͛ᄃ඾ᐂ˟ ҂ΟࡁտٙበĮᅜ᎕̇௢į൴ܑ۞ྍ༫٤ͯĂ֭ણ҂ྍۏனፂᇃэξ͛ ٙIJᇃэݑ႔ᇇ౗ă૵౗൴ଧᖎಡij۞ᐂ͛Ă၆༫͛ࢦઇᐂ७тѨĄ༫͛຿ ݖΊ͛ķĂ38ҖĂ႕Җ34фĂВ1062фĄ2ޓ३ĂࢵᗟĶ੼য়͇࠱̂ 1 廣州市文物考古研究所,〈廣州南漢德陵、康陵發掘簡報〉,《文物》2006.7: 4-25。 2 廣州市文物考古研究所,《銖積寸累——廣州考古十年出土文物選萃》(北京:文物出版 劉文鎖∕南漢〈高祖天皇大帝哀冊文〉考釋——兼說劉氏先祖血統問題 287 ݖΊ͛ޓ੼য়͇࠱̂ ᄳ˯ߗ઼ࡰวᎩฟ઼շࢴ֠ˬѺט३νϳۢإЍ༯͈̂Җܦጯ̀ٚўᅙڒᎰ Ҋᎊᑕ؇ᇤя३Ą͗ ჯ̂ѣ˩̣ѐ໐Ѩ͆૘α͡ϥ૘४˟˩α͟˚̗Ă੼য়͇࠱̂ޓ૪˷ϒ၃Ă གЍ͇̮ѐ˝͆̾͡४˟˩˘͆͟૘ዏৠ˷૵౗Ăᖃ˵Ą௑Λܛ҃㟋ྻĂ௜ ј׹҃ݬቑĂቊ͵য়҃ڱĂྶ֭؄ჯĄޙୈĞఏğ̝ฟૄĄᖬТ Ğ઀ğ ү݋Ăຯ̂ຽ̠҃௣Ăઅλވ̙҃ೊĄ๠͹̥ԂĂ⪢ᲄৣลĂԺଐ൳ҜĂຏ Ăඥ൒࣒ፋĂᆆЏᦉᔃĂछ઼ᔨְˬعᘃĄજᏲ᏷෢Ă┇㉀ܻ౥Ă̱۝ඕ Ă͟͡ޓᇉĄ൭எਭᇍĂୁ͔ৠ Ăᅟ޳࿴෢Ă׻Ҋ⢺୮ĄЄଘ੼য়͇࠱̂ ٮऱ͛ٗĂມಜڠθ ĞីğĂߐ֚ኚཐĂࠖώϛ௑Ăёษഀ׻Ąགྷ͇ቛгĂ јચĂۢۏ඲Ăᔙࡈ෹഼ĄӖᓜ༱઼Ăߐ㗝ˬࡔĂαঔᙡ୻Ă˝эࢲᙴĄฟ Ă᝘ഈ̝ዶĂ٣ᜓۭסᄐϔĄ೎߉̣֘Ăཀྵ߸༱ێ፟׎ৠĂЍш ᎩĂΦ ҘࢳᅦĂ׹͋ဦԛĄ׻ᕃጏͽᓜ ĂᏴჇϠ҃ڌࢽĄຫৈѺͩĂ௒ᖊ̱གྷĂ ⼐ᴍĞ७ğĂᅑՁ⛝̝ྃ˸Ăࢩዑϛ̝ј Ğड़ğĄጬᚼ̲ᗬ͛ Ğќğ᜖Ă ᖟЩĄݡณҏᖱĂҾϨࢦᅅĂ༰ᇷຠһĂ㇯ Ⴏ఩Ąᐷᙵ܎ᙵĂڠ೭୮̲ᆅ ፈ˛ᓂĄ԰ඦΔᜪĂࣧ̚кְĂУЂдᘃĂϏҩჁԠĄᰏᰏͳຽĂᛴᛴ࠱˛ ◀Ă጖ଐᛖҁĂଉ Ğஅğ຋ĂݚᎷځᙱ጑Ą͇ᓂᓐޓ໼ĂˬͳΞᑢẶ ๸Ąᙌϛ݋ត̼д͘Ăႊᛖ˜ͪ͡ঙ͇ĄৠྼⳐ⒳ĞࡿğĂം߽۫ Ğ઀ğĄ ࡶ˜ౚวଯՎĂߐ֚ፌᇴĂЈ៍ࢼ၅Ăۭε૱৏Ąѩγ঻ଐᘽݡĂჟտᗁ ३ĂٕݑΔҊ૷ĂٕҀ኎๔ӆĄ়ⷷٙᎧĂ଄͞ାᒚĂЩᗁ޾͘Ăቊ㎑ৠ ĂຟڠӻĄ૟ཐкਕĂෛϔт๋Ăഈ౎᪫ᔏĂᆆЏ㓯૵Ąк̖кᘹĂ̯̯͛ ݖݙĊ͇፟սளĂ㎎ᖣࢲ߹Ăᖑᒉ⒳ĞࡿğݫĂຐײĄ๣ܥᙱл̵Ăᑯࢲ՚ ؈Ăሁᄂਫ਼૾Ą༱̝፟ີĂ Ğჴğޖ๵ĂͪϮ܅ᝆĂ ࡍڗ෪˩߷Ą᜷ϲ රࠖ఍Ă܅ഈ́͡Ăᆮ ዆ྮĄ ᜇว˝Ă̙ྈ̚ߋĂカϮᘽᅸĂ Ⴝჟ Ąࠖ׻๠ͳĂчҜٚ⇝Ăטય Ă޾ᐵ҃ੜĂѣΐ൑ⷵĂጱೳ᏷ڃᎷĄ୐ ᏲԂ೎Ăᝉቑ׍хĂͶ੊ۭആĄ̚γ૷ܕј׹Ăڱࣖτ৴Ăয়ࢗ࣫ಜĄᅈ ݖݙĊϜࢰд҅Ă̂႙ᑓ঻ĄᆆЏཱི͇Ăࡶಉ҂ӺĂᘆײચĂଉ༷ᖯ໼Ă๣ ጁ̙̈́Ăၨ⤄҃̏Ą㟋ଂᐸ༾ĂАᅈѣഇĂϛझ૟⠏Ăᐷ⻐дরĄЃЕਊ ኜ࢐㢰Ă༱ѐ̙ѤĄ׎ෟ͠ĈגЍĂᄃ͇ԾĞଊğ˳Ă ၮĂݑว࣊Ğ૦ğ੓Ą΃̙ͻཐĂ Ğ઀ğқޙĂᖳ՗ͩצಜෳࡥĂྠᐷޓ јચĂۢ፟׎ৠĂᐷࢳ௜႔Ă܎ෛۏ௜ҜĂ፨జˣ₠Ăᙡ୻ˬࡔĄ׎˘Ąฟ ᎚২ĄᐽĞᆖğһ Ğ৥ğ੺ĂჁԠϏҩĂୗ̋ਝঔĂ๒ཌྷᕩ̥Ą׎˟Ąᚑ 社,2005),頁212-213。 288 漢學研究第 26 卷第 2 期 ະд੔ĂА೶ॻ፹ĂЕཐϲঢ়ĂᖃТ˝ᇁĄয়҂ֽॾĂីᝦ߽໰Ă࡚ջԂ ࢳᅦĂ׹͋ဦԛĄ˙؆٣ސĂЍᅈѣᚹĄ׎ˬĄ២ࡁѺͩĂᏩ០̱གྷĂ၆ޥ ĂೈᒖցઃĂཏጏଖिĂूᛵᙴှĄ׎αĄͳຽᓞᙱĂฟૄؠᜦĂᑯࢲ՚ᜓ ˬĂѝഈ ቪĄགྷᒉα͞Ăկ᝕˝౎Ăְ΍፟АĂඉ൑᏷۰Ą׎̣Ąຫৈܥ ΃ĂથྵѺͳĂࢦᅅ ௢Ă࣠ ୮֊Ąࢲ࿺ฯ᜜Ă࿪়ᅬเĂҌᝦۭീĂҌ ംᙱณĄ׎̱Ą ཐкਕĂ Ğ౾ğ఼ఙᇴĂӖҊᘽݡĂౚวଯՎĄ͉Ϋᓙ ˬຽͳ໼ĂเϮޓĂڠΡᇳ Ă޾ᐵ൑ᄬĄ׎˛Ąཐ͛ࡻކĂڷၦĂ׶ቤҒ ݖײ੺ЃͱĂჁԠϏಶĂ̂႙ᑓ঻Ą׎ˣĄ๣ێĂסரĂ߸ቑ˝ᘞĄԠഇय ܦᖟЩĂᗬ͛ ᆊĂ̙͵ࡻ̖Ă॔ϠͳᜦĄڠݙĊช࡭੼ଐĂࢲ߹㎎ᖣĄᆅ ݖݙĊᐷ⻐ୁ͔Ă૟⠏ϛझĂёೳ͛ײΫ̏በĂ୺ ĞᙜğߔᆷĄ׎˝Ą๣ Ϯᚥ࿵Ăϖᇫ൑቎Ą׎˩ĄגΑĄ჊߹๠͹Ă֘३஄ТĂڠᇇĂࠖࡔ Ă።ԇă̮׌΃Ϗ֍඾ᐂĂΞۢ૵౗ޢѩ༫ҋ̂ѣ˩̣ѐĞ942ğ3 ᐌཨ ϐĄॡˠጌ྾஧Ğ1602-1646Ăځ։рĂϏഅዎ൴னă൸ଧĂۡҌڶېᖟܲ ώğĂ̚ѣIJ͓ݑג൫ࡉˠğᇤĮቷᝰᅦะįĞ୻૵Ⴇมጌؼয়ڌф࡚׹Ăᇃ ྍဪ׶༫۞౵ѝٺ႔ᆒͩဪኬ֭Ԕij׶IJ៍ᆒͩ๯੃ij׌͛Ăߏϫ݈ٙۢᙯ ࡔᐂĄIJ͓ݑ႔ᆒͩဪኬԔij੃ૣ჉˝ѐĞ1636ğᆒ㓢ဪజ൴னགྷ࿅Ĉ රࡿгĂАˠѣϣдپĂႷӈڌĂ༊̣ѿݱ̝ܩѣ߷ЩΔث፜Ă၆ڕछ̟ ஘Ąૣ჉ʹ̄ࡌĂϣมѣ࿩΍Ăጬ҃јϱĄਆ۰ୖͭ࿅҃֍̝ĂЯԸͽλ ߏத̄ٺϮĂ۩۩ѣᓏĂ˜̰˘ฯᗗ׎̚ĂҋҨчĂҌ؆ႽĂჷᗗᆀ൑सĄ ˠтਃЅ̝ᛳ۰˲ᇴĂᓝ̝Чࢦ˩̣ă̱͝Ą׎ϒܛԙˢĂ૟̂൴̝Ă֍ѣ ឭ঴֓᎝̝Ąѣܛညક҃ӱĂࡶͳ۰ᄃЬ̝ᆇĂЧ̣ă̱˩͝Ąг࠰ܛ˟఍ ۏᙡ˘Ăҋ൴ЍĂᒍࠕຳ̚тϨ͟Ąᚗൽ˘ĂൽѰ̚ѣϜ౦ਕྼજĄ׎΁ள Ą྾ᔌـۋ༤̝Ăዐˠᛇ҃ܨĂ۽кĂ̙Ξ޽ᙊĄҭАᛸᙡᕩछĂЍજዐإ ˘Ꮠᓜ׎гෛĂຩ൴˘όĂ̳ռᚱ՟൑ዶĄ׎̚ܨᘭ̝ĂٲĂѣΦя֠ءϨ ഉӈࠎଧ۰ٙᒴĂ੻ጎൾѣх۰Ą̫׎ϱ߇дĂ༫͛ᔳᔳΞ᝝Ăᄏݑ႔ᆒͩ ๯˵Ą4 ဪ̚۞༫Ĉ˞זIJ៍ᆒͩ๯੃ijࢦᕇ೩ ܩݑܩĄݑঔৠᇁ̝ҘݑѣٙᏜΔސ፜Ăٙ࿅߷ᑎڕ˷ᔘـҋ̈ॡଂ΅ݱ̟ ۰ჍĂᆒ⻴Аဪֽޢჷฏˠܝ۰Ă௫็̝̙҃ۢ׎ٙ〔ЩĄͧ࢒̳֘Ăдౌ 3 大有為南漢高祖劉龑年號(928-942)。 4 明.黎遂球,〈弔南漢劉氏墓賦並序〉,《蓮鬚閣集》(《四庫禁燬書叢刊》集部第 183 冊, 北京:北京出版社,2000),卷1,頁30-31。 劉文鎖∕南漢〈高祖天皇大帝哀冊文〉考釋——兼說劉氏先祖血統問題 289 ҃ـࠎਆ۰ٙ൴Ăְࠤ؈ĄЯᅄͽ׎ᄬࢗࠎኬĂ͓̝ĄߊቪĄᕩĂ࠹ᄃࢷҐ Ăϲۻᓂ៍஘Ą׎ᖟ̏۩Ă୸᭕̝ٙ๗Ăා ఏ਷̝ٙᄃ఍ĂϮᕝෘଂᏊ҃ ጯ̀ۢڒݖΊ͛ijĂᎰޓᨰሑ۰̙ۢ˲ೀĄѣ༫˘൘дĂჍࠎIJ੼য়͇࠱̂ٺ ۰Ă૪˷໐͆ޓఠҊᎊᑕ㞾ᇤя३Ą׎ٙࠎ̂ܛ३Πϳ˯඘إᄳϒᛉ͈̂ט ૘α͡ϥ૘४෸͒α͟˚̗Ăཱིࠎ̂ѣ˩̣ѐĂཨͽ̮Ѝ̮ѐĂჍ૵౗Ą5 ӮĞ1630-1696Ăфਃ̋Ă˫ф̬̄Ă̂ئĂ඾ᐂྵкĄ൫ࡉޢጌͩͽ 19IJᆨᄬij੃Ķᆒ㓢ဪķĂྵࠎྎႽĂ̰ट̂࡭סາᄬįڌ൫ࡉˠğĮᇃڌᇃ ࠹ТĄ6 ˟ͩٙᐂ۞ᆒ㓢ဪӈ̫҂Ο൴ଧ̝૵౗ĂĶݖΊ͛ķӈ˯ᐂ̝IJݖ ჉ˬѐĞ1630ğĂ૵౗జ൸ૣٺϐѣЩ۞͛ˠăԠ̀Ă̂ӮϠځΊ͛ijĄጌߏ າᄬį۞੃ྶᑕྍߏણ໰˞ጌͩ۞ڌॡѐ̱͞໐Ąଂၡᐂ۞༫͛࠻ĂĮᇃ ĮቷᝰᅦะįĄ 47ğăष઀ጯסะįܩγĂѦᕓ಴Ğ1629-1709ćĮᘉ३ͩ˟ئጌă ס90ğăͳ̀჉Ğ1634-1711ćĮ࠱රࡔჷįסĞ1631-1694ćĮ᝝ᖃ఼҂į 1ğăӓᜋ࣒Ğ1789-1839ćסϮரįܛڌ4ğăਃ͞ჩĞ1733-1818ćĮག Ϯጯ௫ၚܛ1ğඈˠ˵ѣ඾ᐂĂ׎̚ӓͩ౵୎΍Ą΁ࣇӮ޷סϮԠįܛĮݑ႔ ჍĶ૵౗༫ķĄଂ׎඾ᐂ۞͛ф࠻Ă่ᐂ༫͛۞ฟࢵొ̶ĂΞͽ࠻΍ιࣇ̝ม ٙ੃ߏТͩئߏᔒᖼԨ᝚۞Ă҃׎ᖡώ˫̙ႽΞያĄҭፂ׎ٙᐂĂ༊׶ጌă ѣ໰ౌڱϮԠįĂЯࠎߏ౵୎΍Ăᔵ၆ೀछᄲܛ๴൑ႷĄҌӓᜋ࣒ᇤĮݑ႔˘ ĂΞͽ൴ன׎̚඾ᐂ˯۞યۏ၁גછ༫ͧڍᐂĂҭ҂ፂ่௭௭ᇴᄬĄ7 т ะįć҃Ѧᕓ಴ٙፂĂፂIJᜈ३ЍԂܩϮԠįٙፂĂߏĮᘉ३ܛᗟĈĮݑ႔ ijĂߏ΁дЍԂъॡ᝘ౘ̮ԂٙᄲĂ҃ౘ̮Ԃ˫ߏጴᖣ੃ጸĄ8ޢъᜠ๰ᅛ Į࠱රࡔჷįٙᐂĂ˵ߏ᝘ჷ҃̏Ą9 ϤѩΞ֍ĂѦăͳăਃăӓЧछౌ̙അ Ӯ˵ߏ̙അᏐ̂ئϨ൑ᄱĄځᏐ༜૵౗ࣧ༫Ă҃ᖼ࠹ԨᐂĂ׎̚᏾ప̝఍ 5 黎遂球,〈觀劉氏塚記〉,《蓮鬚閣集》,卷16,頁215。 6 清.屈大均,《廣東新語》(北京:中華書局,1985),卷19,頁495-496。 7 清.吳蘭修,《南漢金石志》(《石刻史料新編》第 3 輯第 4 冊,臺北:新文豐出版公司, 1986),卷1〈康陵碑〉,頁384-385。 8 清.朱彝尊,〈跋五.續書光孝寺鐵塔銘後〉,《曝書亭集》(《景印文淵閣四庫全書》集部 第257冊別集類,臺北:臺灣商務印書館,1986),卷47,頁178-179。 9 參見清.王士禎,《皇華紀聞》(《四庫全書存目叢書》子部第 245 冊,濟南:齊魯書社, 1995),卷4〈劉龑塚〉,頁229。 290 漢學研究第 26 卷第 2 期 ༜Ą઱˘ϫ༜ࣧ༫۞Ăᑕߏጌ྾஧Ą ˬă҂ ᛖ ѐĂ917ˬځ࢐ୖޢĶ̂෸ķĂ።ॡ่˘ѐĞӈ઀қ̮ѐĂ༊ཱིܐݑ႔ ۰Ğ917-971ğĄ11 Яܜྵৣ઼ٺѐğĄ௩ѐԼ઼ཱིĶ႔ķĄ10 д̣΃˩઼̚ᛳ ڼ໛఼ĂາăᖞĮ̣΃Ϋį̈́ĮԇΫįඈϒΫ̈́Įྤ͌ޝઐ఍ᑏݑĂᄃࣧ̚ ரįĞԇĆͳְౌڌ఼ᝥį̚၆׎੃ྶᖎரĂ҃Į˝઼ԠįĞԇĆྮॎᇤğăĮ ჍᇤğăĮӓ෸౯ΫįĞԇĆ᏿ᝀᇤğăĮ઼̣߇ְįĞԇĆҷЩᇤğăĮᜈ఼Ԡį ఼ԠįĞ୻Ćጆഅ໱ඈበᚷğăĮݑ႔३įڌĞ୻Ć಺፿ăᆒ⡗ඈ؇ୄᇤğăĮᇃ Ğ୻Ćୖԗ ᇤğă12Įݑ႔ߋࡌįĞ୻ĆᆒᑕអᇤğăĮ˩઼ߋࡌįĞ୻ĆӓЇ ҊᇤğăĮݑ႔ࡔįĞ୻Ćӓᜋ࣒ᇤğඈΫԠᔵ੃ྶྵྎĂݒЯΫफ़ֽ໚׶በ Ϋў኷ăॡมඈયᗟĂֽ̫͇࠻৿ጹ׽൒̙͌ĄϒЯѩĂѩIJݖΊ͛ijүࠎ ѣᙯ۞➰ޘט༊ॡ঻х˭ֽ۞͛ᚥĂಶព଀ᑓ֖ࠡෳĄүࠎ˘჌ᄃ็௚ಉཨ ֏Ăι޷ѩᙷ͛ౢ็௚ໄࢗ˞ᆒ㓢˘Ϡޞ༫Ķ͛ώķĂݖΊ͛۞Ϋफ़ᆊࣃҋ̙ ຍڦ੃ᐂ׶͌ޝҖྫĂ׎̚ঘ̈́΁࣎ˠϠ߿۞˘ֱ͞ࢬĂߏϒΫ՟ѣٕ۰ Ăͽ̈́ᇤ۰ᎊᑕĞĉ-958ğޘטᇁ؟׶ޘטćѩγĂᔘঘ̈́ݑ႔ݖă⺭Ί۞ Ϋफ़Ąಶѩ༫҃֏Ă࿅Νኜछ҂ᙋ̍үĂЯࠎᐂ͛ౌֽҋ็ᄲă੃ጸĂ҃۞ 10 宋.薛居正等,《舊五代史》(北京:中華書局,1976),卷 135〈僭偽列傳二〉,頁 1808: 「梁貞明三年八月,陟乃僭號於廣州,國號大漢,偽改元為乾亨」。宋.歐陽修,《新五代 史》(北京:中華書局,1974),卷 65〈南漢世家〉,頁 811:「貞明三年,龑即皇帝位,國 號大越,改元曰乾亨」。「二年,祀天南郊,大赦境內,改國號漢」。宋.司馬光編著,元. 胡三省音注,《資治通鑑》(北京:中華書局,1956),卷 270〈後梁紀五〉,頁 8817、 8836:貞明三年八月,「清海、建武節度使劉巖即皇帝位於番禺,國號大越,大赦,改元 乾亨」;貞明四年冬十一月,「越主巖祀南郊,大赦,改國號曰漢」。另參見宋.袁樞, 《通鑑紀事本末》(北京:中華書局,1964),卷39〈劉氏據廣州〉,頁3679-3680。 11 宋.路振,《九國志》(《續修四庫全書》史部第 333 冊別史類,上海:上海古籍出版社, 2003),卷 9〈南漢臣傳〉,頁 310:「南漢。唐天祐元年,烈宗為廣州節度使,至後主大寶 十四年國滅,凡六十七年。斷自高祖乾亨元年為始,凡四主實五十五年」。路氏此說,以為 劉氏的割據廣州實際從劉隱(烈宗)已經開始形成,未曾稱帝而已。 12 梁廷 另撰有《南漢叢錄》二卷及《南漢文字略》四卷,見《續修四庫全書》子部第334冊 別史類,頁1-242。 劉文鎖∕南漢〈高祖天皇大帝哀冊文〉考釋——兼說劉氏先祖血統問題 291 ˯ኢ˵дᆒ㓢˭ཨॡม׶ᇤ۰ᎊᑕ 13 ׌࣎યᗟۋͷΪᐂIJݖΊ͛ij۞ฟᐝĂ ࢬĂனдፂࣧ༫ͧ໰Ă׎ᖞયᗟ̏ߌ൒ࡶ೬Ă҃າયᗟ˵࠹ᑕ҃ϠĄͽ˭ྏ ಶΊ͛ٙͅߍ۞ೀ࣎યᗟү˘҂ᙋĄ ט׶ᇁޘטĞ˘ğݑ႔ݖă⺭Ί ⺭͛ώѣ˟इĈݖΊĞ˫үĶݖඉķğᄃ۞هݖଔă੠ٺͳ̝ѪĂϡޓ ࡁտĄĮ͉π଄ᜓįޞإ̝ؕޘטΊĞ˫үĶ⺭ඉķğĄࠎ˯⺭ᔘѣĶ⺭ᛉķĄѩ ੼৺Ҿ۞ٺIJ͓͛ij͔Į͛ౢ߹Ҿ็ኢįĈĶ̫ٙݖඉ۰ĂΟ➰̝ཌྷķĄ14 ᛳ Ąࢮߌޘט۞ޢͳă͉̄ă͉ЬඈĂߏྵޓٺ➰͛Ąݖă⺭Ί֭ϡͷ૞ϡ ᓨĂ͇̄ኢҖͽኲ⺭Ąଘͳ۰൑˯ĂܭĞ204-273ğĮ᜜ᛖЩįᄲĈĶΟ۰ኜ к⺭̝ܭ຋ĂҊ̄⺭׎ӖͭĂ߇ኜןވݑࢠჍ͇ͽ⺭̝Ą༊ߋࡌॡĂ׹ٺ߇ Ąځ̙ڶĂҭ⺭ඉଐܭ׶ኜ͇̄ٺА২Ăϡٺ੓໚ט⺭ͽ၁˵ķĄ15 ߏ̙ ѣٙត̼Ą݈႔ޢă݈ޘט΍னĄፂΫ३Ă႔΃ݖă⺭Ίޢྵטݖඉ̝ Ăܭͳ׶ЕܭኜٺĂϡڱ⺭ٺĂҭѣ⺭ΊĂჍĶ⺭➰ඉķĂଂᛳޘטҬ൑ݖΊ Ăݖă⺭Ί̈́ޘט႔ݖă⺭ΊޢҾϤ̂ᕃᚺ׶̂Җᇤᆷă˯ݶĄ16 Ϋྶ̶ ᇁĄ͉ٺѨࡊᖟޓဓĄ࠱ܛѨࡊķߏ̶ฟˢᖟ۞ĈĶ͉૝᝝⺭ඉĂᖟޓĶ࠱ 13 〈哀冊文〉撰者盧應的銜名不合問題,朱彝尊、翁方綱曾有懷疑,參見朱彝尊,〈續書光 孝寺鐵塔銘後〉,《曝書亭集》,卷 47,頁178 -179;清.翁方綱,〈光孝寺鐵塔識〉,《粵 東金石略》(《石刻史料新編》第 17 冊地方類,臺北:新文豐出版公司,1986),卷 1,頁 12373 -12374。《十國春秋》〈南漢列傳〉說盧膺高祖時任工部侍郎,大有中加太尉,中宗 時拜中書侍郎、同平章事,乾和(中宗年號)十五年冬卒於官(清.吳任臣,《十國春秋》 ,北京:中華書局,1983,卷 64,頁 903)。梁廷 《南漢書考異》〈盧膺傳〉據此與《曝 書亭集》、《皇華紀聞》、《粵東金石略》考證,以為〈康陵碑〉撰者盧應有兩個名字(應 初、應敕),而與史載之盧膺為同一人(清.梁廷 ,林梓忠校點,《南漢書.南漢書考 異》,廣州:廣東人民出版社,1981,卷 12,頁168 -169)。《蓮鬚閣集》以來諸書所著的 「翰林學士知制誥正議大夫尚書右丞上紫金袋」,與原碑差別大,可以推斷各氏著述皆是轉相 抄襲,而藍本無疑是美周的《蓮鬚閣集》。黎氏當年攜友往觀康陵墓穴、碑刻時,僅是一般 觀光,對碑文未做拓錄,回去後得憑記憶寫此遊記,故於盧應官職上多有錯誤。 14 宋.李昉等,《太平御覽》(北京:中華書局,1960),卷596〈文部.弔文〉,頁2687。 15 《太平御覽》卷 562〈禮儀部四十二.諡〉說是出自《釋名》,今據清.王先謙,《釋名疏證 補》(上海:上海古籍出版社,1984),卷 6〈釋典藝〉,頁 318,考證為出自韋昭之《辯釋 名》。 16 宋.徐天麟,《西漢會要》(北京:中華書局,1955),卷 20〈禮十五.凶禮〉,頁 181:「孝景中二年令:諸王薨,大鴻臚奏諡誄策;列侯薨,大行奏諡誄策。……」 292 漢學研究第 26 卷第 2 期 טĂϤ׎ଂĶඉķфͽ̈́႔΃३ᆷវטΫ؇ݖඉཥ⯇ྔ౗ķĄ17 ݖă⺭ඉ̝ԛ ĄܭͳăЕܭኜٺĂ˫ϡޓ࠱ٺć⺭Ίߊϡޓ࠱ٺ࠻ĂߏଳϡѻᖎĄݖΊϡ ൴Ϡ̂ត̼ĄĮν็įĶఄ̳̮ѐķ͋᎖྿ழĈޘטᗬॢͽֽݖă⺭Ί ߏᅋಧ᝝̝Ăౘ̂ҖΑᇇĂୃҊ̄ݖٺᗬॢͽֽĂ઱͇̄૪˜ѣݖඉĂ૟ཨ ᐁॱ̳׻ķ̝Ķᐁ׻ķęę͔۰ğĄˠҊֽ̝ץѩᙷ˵Ğ९޽ĶͳֹၷܧଐĂ ඉĂ૟ཨኲ׎छĂٺĂኒᇇԔݖĂྶ̝ءĂٕᙑ̝ͽלಉ̙үݖඉĄ։Ҋߊ ͽӘߞĂт̫ݖඉᄏѩᏜ˵Ą18 Ă˵Ξͽྶ̝ͽ➰͛ĂཨءኒረᙑצޢߏΪѣ͇̄ѣݖඉĄˠҊ̚۞։ҊѪ Ăҭѩ჌ඉдڱ᝝ğĂ˵ߏ˘჌ݖଔ̝ඉĄ࣫ॡؼᜈѩކᖃॡĶӘߞķĞ༊ഉ ᑕᄃ͇̄ݖඉ̙ТĄ˯טԛ ѣݖΊă⺭Ίă⺭ᛉĂݖΊă⺭ΊޓĂፂΫྶ࠻Ă࠱ޘט࣫΃ݖă⺭Ί ࠱ЬՔͩğă࠱Ь؟ͽ̈́˘჌Ķᚗჲķᄃ။ăϜ˘྽ᐌཨć19 ࣎Ҿ࠱͉ЬĞ΃ ѣ⺭ΊĂˢᖟ౗ᇁٕ͉ᇁĄ׎͛ώ̝ᇤ۰âਠౌߏ༊ޓ݋͇ğă੠⺭࠱ڠĞ ݋͇̝૫ᏉğĄڠᄨ྾։Ă̝؟ഈࢦҊ׶Щ̀ĶෟҊķĞт੼য়ཱ̝͵ݑĂ͉ ࢡĞТπౢְğ׶ַ˭ܝĂ̶ҾϤ̚३ַࢡĞТπౢְğăטॡؕјؠ؟Ҍ͛ Ğ͌ğࣦٕᖃొַࢡᇤᆷĄ20 ॲፂ҂Οྤफ़ĂߙֱপҾࡦഀ۞͉̄Ğᝉ૱͉ ķĞՂጳğĂ˵ᐌཨѣݖΊٕݖă⺭ΊĄ21ޓᇇ͉̄ă༼ຜ͉̄ඈğ׶Ķឰ࠱ Ă⺭ΊܜğĄݖΊ͛фᇴטĂჍĶϜΊķĞ⺭ΊТԛېڕӔϜኳט࣫΃ݖΊԛ ෟĄĶ⺭ᛉķࠎ˯⺭̝ݶᛉĄޢ͛фᇴྵ͌Ăଳϡα̱វᐧ͛ĂݖΊ݈͛Ԕ ౗ĂޓѣͅߍĄ̣΃˯ޘטᇁ؟ߏ୎̝࣫ዶᜈĂдݖă⺭Ί̈́ט΃ᖃ̣ ፂ੃ྶֽ࠻ౌѣݖΊă⺭Ί׶Ķ⺭ᛉķĂ̶ҾϤ༊͵ࢦҊă͛ˠĞĶෟҊķğᇤ 17 劉宋.范曄,《後漢書》(北京:中華書局,1965),卷96〈禮儀志下〉「大喪」,頁3145。 18 晉.杜預注,孔穎達疏,《春秋左傳注疏》,卷 8〈莊元年盡十年〉,清.阮元校刻,《十三 經注疏》(北京:中華書局,1980),頁1762。 19 參唐.杜佑撰,王文錦點校,《通典》(北京:中華書局,1988),卷 86〈禮四十六.凶禮 八〉,頁2349。 20 參見宋.王溥,《唐會要》(北京:中華書局,1955),卷1、2〈帝號〉,頁1-22。 21 參見陝西省文物管理委員會等,〈唐懿德太子墓發掘簡報〉,《文物》1972.7: 26 -32;陝西 省考古研究所、富平縣文物管理委員會,《唐節愍太子墓發掘報告》(北京:科學出版社, 2004),頁 143 -159;陝西省考古研究所,《唐李憲墓發掘報告》(北京:科學出版社, 2005),頁224-269。 劉文鎖∕南漢〈高祖天皇大帝哀冊文〉考釋——兼說劉氏先祖血統問題 293 ַ˭ܝĂ׎ᇤ۰̶ҾϤ̚३ַࢡĞТπౢְğăטͽֽ۞ؠ؟ᆷĂؼᜈ˞࣫͛ ࢡĞТπౢְğ׶͉૱Ğ͌ğࣦٕᖃొַࢡፉЇĄ22 ९Įᖞ̣΃ΫįIJᖃԠ ᐸݶڈăᇁཱིયᗟĂ౾̀ӕ⺭ޓ͇࣫јˬѐĞ928ğ˩˘͡ࠎؠ࣫͌ޢijĂ˭ ᛉĈ ळ݈Ă֭дីٺⴰ͸Ăਫ਼᝝ٺČČߏͽώഈ߇ְĂ׻͉૝தѺဈ؇⺭ΊӘ͇ ώᇁĄ23ٺᇁĂᖟΊ͉ٺĂ⺭Ίˢ౗Ąࡶ੠಴ؠ⺭Ă׻͉૝᝝⺭Ί̰̝͡˛ ˫ፂĮ̣΃ົࢋįIJޓཱིᗔᐂijĈ ĈĶ੼য়಴ཱི⺭̈́ᇁཱིĂЄࣞ߇ېݶ̋౗ᖃᆇֹ˭ܝ჊˛ѐˣ͡Ă̚३͇ॢ ⴰ͸ĄலĂ؇⺭ΊྱٺĂ૟ୁᕪझ݈Ăፄ͟Ă׻͉૝தѺဈ؇⺭ΊĂӘְ͇ ĄČČķ24טĄѩ௢ഈ̝݈ីٺ᝝ ⺭ᑕࠎϜΊĄ⺭ᚗᄃטᔘѣĶ⺭ᚗķĄ25 ̣΃⺭Ίԛॢޢ࣫ăޢੵѩγĂҌ͌ Ί˘྽ˢ౗ᇁΊӘޢᖟˢ౗̚Ą ѣ̙ٙТĂд݈ླྀͳڶፂ҂Ο൴ଧ۞̣΃˩઼౗ဪྤफ़Ă׎ݖă⺭Ίଐ ⺭ޓҖ࠱̂גᄃϜᘛ࠹ТĂ˯ቓטဪߏᐌཨϜݖă⺭Ί׶⺭ᚗĂ⺭ᚗԛޙ ᚗ⛟̚ć26 ݑ࣫ഢăึ˟౗˵̶ҾᐌཨϜăϮኳ۞ݖΊĄ27 ҃ݑ႔ٺĂ஽ཱི ݋ڶΊă⺭ᚗ۞ଐ⺭ٺĂҌטဪᄫ۞ԛܕᆷݖΊ͛ĂՀତגᆒ㓢ဪ݋ͽϮ༫ ԇ΃͵ޢᄃி̙Т̝఍ĂӈᄃޘטΞ଀ۢĄϤѩΞͽ࠻΍ݑ႔ݖă⺭Ί̙ ࠹ͧ˵̙࠹ᙷĄ࣎ࣧ̚Яࣃ଀ଯၬĄטݖă⺭Ί ځ఼ᝥį੃Ĉ࢐ڼĂፂѩIJݖΊ͛ij˵Ξពᜨ˘˟ĄĮྤޘטᇁ؟ݑ႔ ˬѐĞ917ğˣ͡Ăᆒ㓢 28 ӈ࠱ޓҜĂĶޙˬᇁĂ੠಴য়щ̥͉͠য়͛࠱ 22 參見宋.王溥,《五代會要》(北京:中華書局,1978),卷1〈帝號〉,頁1-9。 23 《舊五代史》,卷143〈禮志下〉,頁1916。 24 《五代會要》,卷1〈帝號雜錄〉,頁7。 25 《舊五代史》,卷 33〈唐書九.莊宗紀〉,頁 458:「丁卯,奉皇太后尊諡寶冊赴西宮靈座, 宰臣豆盧革攝太尉讀冊文,吏部尚書李琪讀寶文,百官素服班於長壽宮門外奉慰」。「諡寶 冊」即諡冊和諡寶,可能都是玉制,分別由太尉和吏部尚書宣讀於靈堂柩前。《舊五代史》 ,卷81〈晉書七.少帝紀〉,頁1072:「甲辰,上大行皇帝尊諡寶冊」。 26 馮漢驥,《前蜀王建墓發掘報告》(北京:文物出版社,1964),頁42。 27 宿白,《中華人民共和國重大考古發現》(北京:文物出版社,1999),頁425-427。 28 清.梁廷 著,林梓忠校點,《南漢書》(廣州:廣東人民出版社,1981),卷 2〈高祖紀 一〉,頁5:「高祖天皇大帝,初名巖,更名陟,復名巖,改名龔,終名龑」。 294 漢學研究第 26 卷第 2 期 ᇁĄ؟ķĄ29 ఺ߏฟ઼ॡٙϲ۞ޓᓷ࠱؟ĂΈᔳ͠ধޓ࠱ڠĂͭᓽ͠΃য়ཐޓ ᇁĂߏၟҌݑ႔઼˸Вϲ̣ᇁĄᄃ።΃αă˟؟Ă˫ΐ੼য়ă̚ޢ̝؟ধ ႔ޢαᇁĂॢޢ࣫˛ᇁĂޢαᇁĂୖޢ࠹ͧౌ̙ТĞט΃ᇁ̣̈́טă˛ᇁ̱ ׹αᇁğĄ30 Яࠎ׎য়ͭͽ˯̙̏୻຾Ă၁д൑Ξ੠಴ϲᇁ۰ĄኜޢᇁĂ̱
Recommended publications
  • The Reunification of China: Peace Through War Under the Song Dynasty Peter Lorge Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-08475-9 - The Reunification of China: Peace through War under the Song Dynasty Peter Lorge Index More information Index Alexander the Great, 281 Changzhou, 82 An Lushan Rebellion, 41 Chanyuan, 4, 6–7, 9, 11–12, 15, 17–20, Ancestral Rules, 38 153, 238–9, 244–5, 247, 262–4, Anguozhen, 235 266–75, 277, 286 Anyang River, 99 Chanyuan Covenant, 4, 6–7, 9, 11, 15, 18–20, autumn defense, 256, 262 30–3, 41, 43, 225, 238–9, 244–5, 247, 269–70, 272–5, 277 Bagongyuan, 51 Chen Feng, 38–9 Bai Jiyun, 233 Chen Hongjin, 190 Bai River, 204 Chen Qiao, 173, 176 Bai Zhongzan, 51 Chen Shiqing, 230 Baidimiao, 145 Chen Yaosou, 264 Baigou River, 217 Chengdu, 146, 225, 227–32, 234 Baitian, 161 Chengtian, 18 Baozhou, 245, 265 Chengzhou, 63 Battle of Gaoping, 32, 38, 48, 71, 100 Chiang Kai-shek, 35 Battle of Wangdu, 257 Chinese Ways in War,41 Bazhou, 231 Chizhou, 170–1 Beiping Fort, 265 Chu, 119, 121–4, 126, 128, 131, Beizhou, 266 236, 265 Bi Shi’an, 264 Chu Zhaofu, 166–7 Bian Canal, 92 Chuzhou, 79, 84, 93 Bian Hao, 89 Cizhou, 50 Bian River, 90–1, 98 Clausewitz, 271 Biankou, 95 Comprehensive Mirror Bozhou, 221 Comprehensive Mirror for Aid in Governing, 26–8, 34 Cai River, 118 Caishi, 168, 172, 175 Dahui Fort, 109 Caishiji, 171 Daizhou, 60, 219, 221 Cangzhou, 98, 244 Daming, 156, 197 Cao Bin, 137, 145–6, 149, 169–72, Damingfu, 197 174–5, 179, 186, 190, 193, 208–9, Dangtu, 171 214–19 David Curtis Wright, 42, 272, 274, 276 Cao Han, 87, 179, 203 Davis, Richard, 31, 40 Cao Keming, 226 Dechong, 209 Cao Liyong, 268–9, 271 Defang, 182–3,
    [Show full text]
  • Fine-Scale Population Structure and Demographic History of Han Chinese Inferred from Haplotype Network of 111,000 Genomes
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.03.166413; this version posted July 3, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Fine-scale Population Structure and Demographic History of Han Chinese Inferred from Haplotype Network of 111,000 Genomes Ao Lan1,†, Kang Kang2,1,†, Senwei Tang1,2,†, Xiaoli Wu1,†, Lizhong Wang1, Teng Li1, Haoyi Weng2,1, Junjie Deng1, WeGene Research Team1,2, Qiang Zheng1,2, Xiaotian Yao1,* & Gang Chen1,2,3,* 1 WeGene, Shenzhen Zaozhidao Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518042, China 2 Shenzhen WeGene Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen 518118, China 3 Hunan Provincial Key Lab on Bioinformatics, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China † These authors contributed equally to this work. * Correspondence: Xiaotian Yao: [email protected] & Dr. Gang Chen: [email protected] ABSTRACT Han Chinese is the most populated ethnic group across the globe with a comprehensive substructure that resembles its cultural diversification. Studies have constructed the genetic polymorphism spectrum of Han Chinese, whereas high-resolution investigations are still missing to unveil its fine-scale substructure and trace the genetic imprints for its demographic history. Here we construct a haplotype network consisted of 111,000 genome-wide genotyped Han Chinese individuals from direct-to-consumer genetic testing and over 1.3 billion identity-by-descent (IBD) links. We observed a clear separation of the northern and southern Han Chinese and captured 5 subclusters and 17 sub-subclusters in haplotype network hierarchical clustering, corresponding to geography (especially mountain ranges), immigration waves, and clans with cultural-linguistic segregation.
    [Show full text]
  • From Warhorses to Ploughshares: the Later Tang Reign of Emperor Mingzong
    《中國文化研究所學報》 Journal of Chinese Studies No. 61 – July 2015 Book Reviews 353 From Warhorses to Ploughshares: The Later Tang Reign of Emperor Mingzong. By Richard L. Davis. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2014. Pp. xiii + 219. $60.00. Within the emerging field of Five Dynasties and Ten States studies, starting with 1 Edward H. Schafer, Brigitte Amthor, and Wang Hongjie, biographies of rulers have played an important part. The present study of Emperor Mingzong 明宗 (r. 926–933) of the Later Tang 後唐 by Richard L. Davis is thus a most welcome addition. Davis conveniently summarizes the history of the Shatuo 沙陀 and Shatuo rule in northern China until the end of the Later Tang dynasty. Previous studies have examined Shatuo rule in the general context of Five Dynasties history whereas Davis singles out the reign of one ruler, that of the second Later Tang ruler Mingzong, whom he clearly sees as an exemplary “good” ruler in terms of his adoption of cultural policies and leanings towards peaceful policies. The writing style is fluid, and the contents covers much more than just the life of Mingzong. This book starts with a preface (pp. xi–xvi), followed by Chapter 1 “People and Places” (pp. 1–31), an introduction to Shatuo history, family relations, and the main political actors. Chapter 2 “Royal Passage” (pp. 33–61) describes the rise of Li Siyuan 李嗣源, the later Mingzong, to the throne of the Later Tang. Chapters 3 and 4 “Political Events” look at Mingzong’s reign according to his reign titles Tiancheng 天 成 (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction of Sino-Muslim Histories and Identities in the Early Twentieth Century
    “Awakening” Country and Faith: The Construction of Sino-Muslim Histories and Identities in the Early Twentieth Century Mengyu Huang Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite for Honors in East Asian Studies April 2012 © 2012 Mengyu Huang Acknowledgments It is my pleasure to thank the many people who made this thesis possible. Foremost, I must express sincere gratitude to my advisors Professors C. Pat Giersch and Y. Tak Matsusaka. Their guidance, encouragement, patience, and knowledge were all key ingredients in bringing this thesis to fruition. Professor Giersch’s “Chinese Frontier Experience, 1600 to the Present” seminar deserves credit for sparking and sustaining my interest in exploring Chinese ethnopolicy and Sino-Muslims. I am indebted to his advice throughout the initial planning and research stages. I am equally indebted to Professor Matsusaka for his assistance throughout the writing process. His careful reading of the drafts and always-insightful comments helped me sharpen my arguments and bring out the “melody” of each chapter. Any remaining mistakes are, of course, my own. I must also extend my gratitude to the East Asian Studies Department for being my academic home throughout my four years at Wellesley and to director Professor Katharine Moon for her tremendous efforts in strengthening the program and resources available to majors. Professors Ellen Widmer and David Lindauer also deserve many warm and heartfelt thanks for serving as my major advisors and for further enriching my undergraduate academic experience. The History Department deserves recognition for generously allowing me to participate in its honor thesis writing workshop. A special thanks to Professor Alejandra Osorio for leading the workshop and providing the extra push (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • From Warhorses to Ploughshares: the Later Tang Reign of Emperor Mingzong
    《中國文化研究所學報》 Journal of Chinese Studies No. 61 – July 2015 Book Reviews 353 From Warhorses to Ploughshares: The Later Tang Reign of Emperor Mingzong. By Richard L. Davis. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2014. Pp. xiii + 219. $60.00. Within the emerging field of Five Dynasties and Ten States studies, starting with 1 Edward H. Schafer, Brigitte Amthor, and Wang Hongjie, biographies of rulers have played an important part. The present study of Emperor Mingzong 明宗 (r. 926–933) of the Later Tang 後唐 by Richard L. Davis is thus a most welcome addition. Davis conveniently summarizes the history of the Shatuo 沙陀 and Shatuo rule in northern China until the end of the Later Tang dynasty. Previous studies have examined Shatuo rule in the general context of Five Dynasties history whereas Davis singles out the reign of one ruler, that of the second Later Tang ruler Mingzong, whom he clearly sees as an exemplary “good” ruler in terms of his adoption of cultural policies and leanings towards peaceful policies. The writing style is fluid, and the contents covers much more than just the life of Mingzong. This book starts with a preface (pp. xi–xvi), followed by Chapter 1 “People and Places” (pp. 1–31), an introduction to Shatuo history, family relations, and the main political actors. Chapter 2 “Royal Passage” (pp. 33–61) describes the rise of Li Siyuan 李嗣源, the later Mingzong, to the throne of the Later Tang. Chapters 3 and 4 “Political Events” look at Mingzong’s reign according to his reign titles Tiancheng 天 成 (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Gate to the South
    Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften / Austrian Academy of Sciences AAS WORKING PAPERS IN SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY Volume 29 Angela Schottenhammer CHINA’S GATE TO THE SOUTH: IRANIAN AND ARAB MERCHANT NETWORKS IN GUANGZHOU DURING THE TANG-SONG TRANSITION (c.750–1050), PART II: 900–c.1050 Band 29 ÖAW ARBEITSPAPIERE ZUR SOZIALANTHROPOLOGIE AAS Working Papers in Social Anthropology / ÖAW Arbeitspapiere zur Sozialanthropologie ISBN-Online: 978-3-7001-7880-4 DOI:10.1553/wpsa29 Wien 2015 Editors / Herausgeber: Andre Gingrich & Guntram Hazod © Institut für Sozialanthropologie Zentrum Asienwissenschaften und Sozialanthropologie Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften Apostelgasse 23 A-1030 Wien Fax: 01/ 51581-6450 E-Mail: [email protected] CHINA’S GATE TO THE SOUTH: Iranian and Arab Merchant Networks in Guangzhou during the Tang-Song Transition (c.750–1050), Part II: 900–c.1050* ANGELA SCHOTTENHAMMER In a world of tumult many courtiers [sic] of the Middle Kingdom journeyed to the far reaches of Lingnan in search of sanctuary. There were famous courtiers banished for life in the far south during Tang times who often left behind survivors; or officials on recent assignment who encountered tumult that impeded their safe passage back north – these are the sorts of persons to become itinerants beyond the Lingnan Mountains1 1. Introduction “In late Tang times, Nanhai was the last region to succumb to chaos, so senior courtiers after Xizong’s reign [, r. 873–888] serving locally as governors could find no place untouched by turmoil, safe for Nanhai. Yet it also turned independent beginning with Yin’s [that is, Liu Yin , A.S.] rule” (Davis 2004: 537).
    [Show full text]
  • Cremation and Body Burning in Five Dynasties China*
    《中國文化研究所學報》 Journal of Chinese Studies No. 55 - July 2012 Cremation and Body Burning in Five Dynasties China* Christina Han University of Toronto Cremation—the disposal of the dead body by incineration—has a long history in China dating back to the Neolithic period, although throughout much of this historic era it was stigmatized and its use was largely localized to a limited number of ethnic minorities and religious groups. China, however, did witness a period of the widespread popularity of cremation, a development that began in the Tang (618–907), quickly expanded during the Five Dynasties (907–960), and reached its peak in the early Song (960–1276). This paper examines the practice of cremation during the Five Dynasties period. A number of factors contributed to the rapid growth of cremation in China during the tenth century. Increased interaction with powerful northern ethnic groups and the influence of Buddhism helped familiarize the practice among the Han Chinese. Moreover, in the period characterized by incessant warfare and political upheavals, the convenient practi- cality of cremation transformed it into a realistic alternative to traditional burial. Yet, besides these three widely agreed-upon factors, there was another largely overlooked connection which, I believe, was responsible for popularizing the practice: namely, crema- tion’s connection to positive body burning, which became particularly prominent during the Five Dynasties. As Ebrey observed, although cremation in China has largely been perceived as a Buddhist practice, the religious connection is not easily noticeable in the archaeological and textual findings related to the Song and Yuan period cremation burials.1 That is to say that Buddhist or outside cultural influence alone fails to paint a full and complex picture of the Chinese practice of cremation in the tenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Summer 2016 Issue
    新 西 籣 東 增 會 館 THE TUNG JUNG ASSOCIATION OF NZ INC PO Box 9058, Wellington, New Zealand www.tungjung.org.nz Newsletter Summer 2016 issue ______ ——— The Tung Jung Association of New Zealand Committee 2016—2017 President Gordon Wu 388 3560 Membership Kaye Wong 388 8060 Vice President Peter Moon 389 8819 499 8082 Secretaries- English Eugenie McCabe 475 7707 Property Alex Chang 0278110551 Chinese Kevin Zeng 021 669628 Sam Kwok 388 3560 Treasurer Robert Ting 478 6253 Newsletter Gordon Wu 389 8819 Assistant treasurer Virginia Ng 232 9971 Peter Moon 388 3560 Social Peter Wong 388 5828 Website Gordon Wu 389 8819 Andrina Chang 499 8032 Peter Moon Peter Moon 389 8819 388 3560 Valerie Ting 565 4421 Public Gordon Wu relations Please visit our website at http://www.tungjung.org.nz 1 President’s report……… The last three months has gone by so quickly and Christmas is almost here so we all can have a quiet time after a hectic year. Since the last newsletter, we have had the annual general meeting and three committee stalwarts have decided to retire. There has been a re-shuffle of the committee, and whereas I am still president, Peter Moon is now vice-president. Taking over the secretarial duties is Eugenie McCabe, who recently joined us and Alex Chang and Sam Kwok have taken over the property management. The Moon Festival dinner at the Dragon’s Restaurant was well attended though numbers were slightly down from last year probably due to the fact that other organisations all had their celebrations on the same day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Later Tang Reign of Emperor Mingzong
    From Warhorses to Ploughshares The Later Tang Reign of Emperor Mingzong Richard L. Davis Hong Kong University Press The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Road Hong Kong www.hkupress.org © 2014 Hong Kong University Press ISBN 978-988-8208-10-4 (Hardback) All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any infor- mation storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed and bound by Paramount Printing Co., Ltd., Hong Kong, China Contents Acknowledgments ix Preface xi Chart 1: Ancestry of Li Siyuan xvi Map 1: Map of Later Tang, ca. 926 xiv Chapter 1: People and Places 1 The conI 1 The Shatuo People 6 The Life and Legacy of Li Keyong 11 Imperial Women 15 Sons 18 Surrogate Sons 21 The upremeS Sibling Rivalry 24 Cast of Political Characters 26 Chapter 2: Royal Passage 33 The Slow Climb 33 The bortedA Reign of Zhuangzong 39 Unruly Guards and Bodyguards 42 The epidT Regent 49 Chapter 3: Political Events: The Tiancheng Reign, 926–930 63 Chapter 4: Political Events: The Changxing Reign, 930–933 89 Chapter 5: Institutions, Reforms, and Political Culture 121 Governing Officials 121 Law and Order 126 Campaign against Corruption 131 Historical Practices and Projects 134 Culture 137 Education and Examinations 140 From Finances to Technology 147 viii Contents Chapter 6: Volatile Periphery 155 The Shatuo-Kitan Rivalry 155 Nanping 162 Sichuan in Revolt 164 Epilogue 177 The bortedA Rule of Li Conghou (r.
    [Show full text]
  • War, Politics and Society Inearly Modern China, 900-1795
    War, Politics and Society in Early Modern China, 900–1795 In this new take on China’s early modern history, Peter Lorge presents a fresh overview of the repeated recreation of the Chinese empire through military force. Emphasizing the relationship between the military and politics, and China’s power as an empire, Lorge argues that the strength of the territorial claims and political impact of each dynasty were determined primarily by their military capacity rather than by their cultural characteristics. Using a chronological narrative, War, Politics and Society in Early Modern China, 900–1795 breaks free of the dynastic boundaries that shape much scholarship in this area, focusing instead on the growing power of local elites. This power eventually led to a system of loose central control – to the sacrifice of real, centralized power over local affairs. Ideal for students of military and Asian studies, War, Politics and Society in Early Modern China, 900–1795 is essential reading for anyone interested in the military history of China. Peter Lorge is Senior Lecturer in Chinese History and Film at Vanderbilt University. WARFARE AND HISTORY Series Editor: Jeremy Black Professor of History, University of Exeter AIR POWER IN THE AGE OF TOTAL WAR MODERN CHINESE WARFARE, 1795–1989 John Buckley Bruce A. Elleman THE ARMIES OF THE CALIPHS: MODERN INSURGENCIES AND MILITARY AND SOCIETY IN THE COUNTER-INSURGENCIES: GUERRILLAS EARLY ISLAMIC STATE AND THEIR OPPONENTS SINCE 1750 Hugh Kennedy Ian F.W. Beckett THE BALKAN WARS, 1912–1913: PRELUDE MUGHAL WARFARE: IMPERIAL FRONTIERS TO THE FIRST WORLD WAR AND HIGHROADS TO EMPIRE 1500–1700 Richard C.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing China, 150-1850
    Gove rni ng Chi na 15 0–1850 John W. Dardess GOVERNING CHINA 150–1850 GOVERNING CHINA 150–1850 JOHN W. DARDESS Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. Indianapolis/Cambridge Copyright © 2010 by Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 14 13 12 11 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 For further information, please address Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. P.O. Box 44937 Indianapolis, Indiana 46244-0937 www.hackettpublishing.com Cover design by Abigail Coyle Text design by Mary Vasquez Maps by William Nelson Composition by Cohographics Printed at Sheridan Books, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dardess, John W., 1937– Governing China : 150–1850 / John W. Dardess. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-60384-311-9 (pbk.) — ISBN 978-1-60384-312-6 (cloth) 1. China—Politics and government. 2. China—Social conditions. 3. China—History—Han dynasty, 202 B.C.–220 A.D. 4. China—History— Qing dynasty, 1644–1912. 5. Political culture—China—History. 6. Social institutions—China—History. 7. Education—China—History. I. Title. DS740.2.D37 2010 951—dc22 2010015241 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences— Permanence of paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI z39.48–1984. CONTENTS Preface vii Introduction: Comparing China in 150 and China in 1850 x Timelines xxiii Maps xxvii PART 1. FROM FRAGMENTATION TO REUNIFICATION, 150–589 1 The Unraveling of the Later Han, 150–220 3 The Three Kingdoms, 221–264 5 The Western Jin, 266–311 6 A Fractured Age, 311–450 8 Unity in the North: The Northern Wei, 398–534 12 Not by Blood Alone: Steps to Reunification, 534–589 16 PART 2.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Zizhi Tongjian and Its Sources
    Scuola Dottorale di Ateneo Graduate School Dottorato di ricerca in Lingue Culture e Società Ciclo XXVI Anno di discussione 2014 Historiography and Narrative Construction of the Five Dynasties Period (907-960) in the Zizhi tongjian and its Sources. Settore scientifico disciplinare di afferenza: L-OR/21, L-OR/23 Tesi di dottorato di Maddalena Barenghi, 955781 Coordinatore del Dottorato Tutori del Dottorando Prof. Federico Squarcini Prof. Tiziana Lippiello Prof. Hans van Ess Table of Contents Chronology .................................................................................................................. iv Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Writing Historical Guides for Proper Government in the Eleventh Century........ 1 Chronological Framework of the Zizhi tongjian................................................. 11 Structure of the Annals…………………………………………………………………15 Lessons from a Period of Disunity……………………………………………………22 Recent Scholarship……………………………………………………………………..28 Abridgments……………………………………………………………………..32 Chapter One: The Zizhi tongjian and its Sources for the History of the Five Dynasties Period .......................................................................................................................... 39 1. Early Tenth-Century History Writing ................................................................ 40 1.1. The Liang Taizu shilu and the Da Liang bianyi lu ........................................ 41 1.2.
    [Show full text]