Executive Summary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The “Jūdō Sukebei”
ISSN 2029-8587 PROBLEMS OF PSYCHOLOGY IN THE 21st CENTURY Vol. 9, No. 2, 2015 85 THE “JŪDŌ SUKEBEI” PHENOMENON: WHEN CROSSING THE LINE MERITS MORE THAN SHIDŌ [MINOR INFRINGEMENT] ― SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR IN JŪDŌ COACHES AND INSTRUCTORS Carl De Crée University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium International Association of Judo Researchers, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The sport of jūdō was intended as an activity “for all”. Since in 1996 a major sex abuse scandal broke out that involved a Dutch top jūdō coach and several female elite athletes, international media have identified many more abuses. To date no scholarly studies exist that have examined the nature, extent, and consequences of these anomalies. We intend in this paper to review and analyze sexual abuses in jūdō. To do so we offer a descriptive jurisprudence overview of relevant court and disciplinary cases, followed by a qualitative-analytical approach looking at the potential factors that prompt jūdō-related bullying and sexual harassment. Sex offenders may be attracted to jūdō because of: 1. the extensive bodily contact during grappling, 2. the easy access to voyeuristic opportunities during contest weigh-ins and showering, 3. Jūdō’s authoritarian and hierarchical structure as basis for ‘grooming’, 4. lack of integration of jūdō’s core moral component in contemporary jūdō coach and instructor education, and 5. its increasing eroti- cization by elite jūdō athletes posing for nude calendars and media and by specialized pornographic jūdō manga and movies. Cultural conceptions and jurisprudence are factors that affect how people perceive the seriousness and how these offences are dealt with. -
Last Name First Name Federation Weight Agegroup Jones
Last Name First Name Federation Weight AgeGroup Jones Amber USA Judo (USA) 52 Kg F1 (30-34) De Lima Cipollini Michelle Confederaco Brasileira de Judo (BRA) 52 Kg F1 (30-34) Matrosova Ekaterina USA Judo (USA) 57 Kg F1 (30-34) Roland Delphine Federation Francaise de Judo (FRA) 63 Kg F1 (30-34) Added Amanda Federation Francaise de Judo (FRA) 63 Kg F1 (30-34) Baur Nora German Judo Federation (GER) 63 Kg F1 (30-34) Silva Joana Confederaco Brasileira de Judo (BRA) 63 kg F1 (30-34) Silva Joana Confederaco Brasileira de Judo (BRA) 63 kg F1 (30-34) Rodrigues Phyllis Confederaco Brasileira de Judo (BRA) 63 kg F1 (30-34) Stahn Claudia Austrian Judo Federation (AUT) 78 Kg F1 (30-34) Vallejo Chelys Judo Canada (CAN) +78 Kg F1 (30-34) Morrell-Pruitt Rhonda USA Judo (USA) +78 Kg F1 (30-34) Berg Cornelia German Judo Federation (GER) +78 Kg F2 (35-39) Legden Bayarmaa Mongolian Judo Association (MNG) +78 Kg F2 (35-39) Batmunkh Bolortsatsral Mongolian Judo Association (MNG) +78 Kg F2 (35-39) Got Sēverine Federation Francaise de Judo (FRA) 48 Kg F2 (35-39) Carta Alessandra Italian Judo Federation (ITA) 52 Kg F2 (35-39) Kuzmenko Ella Russian Judo Federation (RUS) 57 Kg F2 (35-39) Bastient Patricia Federation Francaise de Judo (FRA) 63 Kg F2 (35-39) Paillard Karine Federation Francaise de Judo (FRA) 63 Kg F2 (35-39) Jähnke Sandra German Judo Federation (GER) 63 Kg F2 (35-39) Mijiddorj Sarangua Mongolian Judo Association (MNG) 63 Kg F2 (35-39) Markelova Marketa Czech Judo Federation (CZE) 63 kg F2 (35-39) Luttringer Angéliques Federation Francaise de Judo (FRA) -
A EUROPEAN SECTOR SKILLS ALLIANCE for SPORT and PHYSICAL ACTIVITY (ESSA-Sport)
A EUROPEAN SECTOR SKILLS ALLIANCE FOR SPORT AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY (ESSA-Sport) NATIONAL REPORT GERMANY Agreement reference number – 2016-3283/001-001 Project number – 575668-EPP-1-2016-1-FR-EPPKA2-SSA-N TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ 2 1. THE ESSA-SPORT PROJECT AND BACKGROUND TO THE NATIONAL REPORT ........................................ 4 2. NATIONAL KEY FACTS AND OVERALL DATA ON THE LABOUR MARKET ............................................... 8 3. THE NATIONAL SPORT AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SECTOR .................................................................. 12 4. SPORT LABOUR MARKET STATISTICS ............................................................................................... 24 5. NATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING SYSTEM .............................................................................. 44 6. NATIONAL SPORT EDUCATION AND TRAINING SYSTEM ................................................................... 56 7. FINDINGS FROM THE EMPLOYER SURVEY ........................................................................................ 62 8. REPORT ON NATIONAL CONSULTATIONS ........................................................................................ 88 9. NATIONAL CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................... 95 10. NATIONAL ACTION PLAN AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................... -
Kōdōkan Jūdō's Three Orphaned Forms of Counter Techniques
REVIEW ARTICLE Kōdōkan Jūdō’s Three Orphaned Forms of Counter Techniques – Part 1: The Gonosen-no-kata – “Forms of Post-Attack Initiative Counter Throws” Carl De CréeABDE Authors’ Contribution: Department of Languages and Cultures, Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent University, Belgium A Study Design B Data Collection Source of support: private resources C Statistical Analysis D Manuscript Preparation E Funds Collection Received: 30 October 2014; Accepted: 26 March 2015; Published online: 23 April 2015 ICID: 1151330 Abstract Background & Study Aim. The purpose of the present paper is to provide a comprehensive study ofgonosen-no-kata [“Forms of Post- Attack Initiative Counter Throws”], a non-officially accepted kata of Kōdōkan jūdō made popular in Western Europe by Kawaishi Mikinosuke (1899-1969). Material & Methods. To achieve this we apply historical methods and source criticism to offer a careful critical analysis of the ori- gin, history and background of this kata. Results. The first verifiable appearance of gonosen-no-kata is in 1926 at the occasion of the London Budōkwai’s 9th Annual Display, where it was publicly demonstrated by Ishiguro Keishichi (1897-1974), previously at Waseda University and since 1924 living in Paris. Thekata builds on intellectual material conceived by Takahashi Kazuyoshi. A 1932 program brochure of an Oxford University Judo Club event is the oldest known source to link Kawaishi and gonosen-no-kata. Kawaishi considered gonosen-no-kata as the third randori-no-kata. Kawaishi’s major role in spreading jūdō in France and continental Europe between 1935 and 1965, and the publication of his seminal jūdō kata book in 1956, connected his name to this kata forever. -
Benchmarking – German Report Document Produced by Sport Structures Ltd
Benchmarking – German Report Document produced by Sport Structures Ltd Sport Structures Ltd, Company Number 4492940 PO Box 10710, Sutton Coldfield, B75 5YG (t): +44(0)845 241 7195 (m): +44(0)7766 768 474 (f): +44(0)845 241 7197 (e): [email protected] (w): www.sportstructures.com Sport Structures Ltd September 2011 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1 Country characteristics ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Demographic structure ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Health indicators ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Sports participation ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Sports success ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Sports/GDP ................................................................................................................................................................................... -
Study on Sports Agents in the European Union
STUDY ON SPORTS AGENTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A study commissioned by the European Commission (Directorate-General for Education and Culture) November 2009 KEA – CDES – EOSE: Study on sports agents in the European Union 2 KEA – CDES – EOSE: Study on sports agents in the European Union EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. Overview of the study In March 2007, the European Parliament invited the European Commission to assist football bodies and organisations in improving the regulations governing sports agents 1. In July 2007, the European Commission indicated in its White Paper on Sport 2 that it would “ carry out an impact assessment to provide a clear overview of the activities of players’ agents in the EU and an evaluation of whether action at EU level is necessary, which will also analyse the different possible options ”. The European Commission’s terms of reference for this study confirm that the European Commission “ wants to have an analysis of the situation regarding sports agents in all the sports they deal with”. The aim of the study is therefore to examine the situation of sports agents in the European Union and to identify, analyse and describe the questions that their activities give rise to as well as the solutions that have already been provided by public and/or private actors, thus enabling the European Commission to assess – on the basis of the data collected, the problems identified and the analyses carried out – whether intervention is required and, if so, at what level and in what form. The study develops, for the first time, a European outlook on the issue of sports agents. -
23-25 February 2018 DÜSSELDORF GRAND PRIX Germany
DÜSSELDORF GRAND PRIX Germany 23-25 February 2018 Dusseldorf GRAND PRIX 2018 Germany 23-25 February 2018 The IJF World Judo Tour arrives in Europe in February following back-to-back Grand Prix in Africa. Germany is one of the most famous legs on the IJF World Judo Tour and the Dusseldorf Grand Prix is an event that attracts top- level judoka and teams from all continents due to its first-class reputation and the strength of judo in the country. The start of the Tokyo 2020 Olympic qualification is fast approaching and begins in May. We are already at a vital juncture in the year and this cycle for all nations and judoka as they prepare for an arduous but incredibly worthwhile journey towards @MariusVizer an Olympics where they hope to realise their dreams. This year the main target for all athletes will be the 2018 World Judo Championships in Baku, Azerbaijan, and places are already being snapped by the most successful judoka on the tour. Dusseldorf will see Olympic and world medallists in action and it will all be enjoyed by a wonderful audience. I would like to thank German Judo Federation for their fine efforts in developing, promoting and hosting this Grand Prix. I would like to wish good luck to all the competing countries, athletes, coaches, officials and staff. Marius L. VIZER President International Judo Federation Dusseldorf GRAND PRIX 2018 Germany 23-25 February 2018 Distinguished guests, On behalf of the German Judo-Federation (DJB) I would like to welcome you to the Judo Grand Prix 2018 in Germany. -
German Olympic Sports Confederation (DOSB) DOSB-Institutions Patron: Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier
Affiliated German Olympic Sports Confederation (DOSB) DOSB-Institutions Patron: Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier German Olympic Academy „Willi Daume“ German Sports Youth (dsj) German Sports & Olympics Museum Presidential Board Commissions Alfons Hörmann · President Uschi Schmitz · Vice President High Perfomance Sports Executive Committee German Sports Marketing Ltd. · High Performance Sports Commission Andreas Silbersack · Vice President Sport for All/Sports Development · Coaches‘ Commission Kaweh Niroomand · Vice President Economic and Financial Affairs Veronika Rücker · CEO · Medical Commission German SportsPass Ltd. Gudrun Doll-Tepper · Vice President Education appoints Dirk Schimmelpfennig · High Performance Sports appoints · Environment Commission Petra Tzschoppe · Vice President Women and Gender Equality Karin Fehres · Sports Development · Health Commission German Sports Aid Jan Holze · Chairman German Sports Youth (dsj) Christina Gassner · Youth Sports · Education Commission Jonathan Koch · Chairman Athletes‘ Commission Thomas Arnold · CFO · Finance Commission German Sports Foundation Thomas Bach · IOC Member Britta Heidemann · IOC Member · Ethics Commission Leadership Academy of the German Olympics Sports Confederation · Athletes' Commission Coaches Academy of the German (elected by the General Assembly of Athletes) Olympics Sports Confederation elects Association IAT/FES r. A. 10 votes ·Institute for Applied Training Science (IAT) General Assembly ·Institute for Research and Development of Sports Equipment (FES) highest -
Sexual Harassment and Inappropriate Behavior in Jūdō Coaches and Instructors
ISSN 2029-8587 PROBLEMS OF PSYCHOLOGY IN THE 21st CENTURY Vol. 9, No. 2, 2015 85 The “Jūdō Sukebei” PheNOMENON: When Crossing the Line MeritS MORE THAN Shidō [Minor infringeMent] ― SexuaL harassment and inappropriate behavior in Jūdō CoaCheS and inStruCtorS Carl De Crée university of rome “tor vergata”, rome, italy ghent university, ghent, belgium international association of Judo researchers, united kingdom e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The sport of jūdō was intended as an activity “for all”. Since in 1996 a major sex abuse scandal broke out that involved a Dutch top jūdō coach and several female elite athletes, international media have identified many more abuses. To date no scholarly studies exist that have examined the nature, extent, and consequences of these anomalies. We intend in this paper to review and analyze sexual abuses in jūdō. To do so we offer a descriptive jurisprudence overview of relevant court and disciplinary cases, followed by a qualitative-analytical approach looking at the potential factors that prompt jūdō-related bullying and sexual harassment. Sex offenders may be attracted to jūdō because of: 1. the extensive bodily contact during grappling, 2. the easy access to voyeuristic opportunities during contest weigh-ins and showering, 3. Jūdō’s authoritarian and hierarchical structure as basis for ‘grooming’, 4. lack of integration of jūdō’s core moral component in contemporary jūdō coach and instructor education, and 5. its increasing eroti- cization by elite jūdō athletes posing for nude calendars and media and by specialized pornographic jūdō manga and movies. Cultural conceptions and jurisprudence are factors that affect how people perceive the seriousness and how these offences are dealt with. -
Booking Veterans Reservas Veteranos
Row Labels NOM CLUB Given Name Nº BOOKING Argentina Judo Confederation ARG Quilmes MdP RUIZ DIAZ WILLY WV00328 (blank) BITONTO MARCELO ADRIAN WV00580 BUSTOS FIERRO RAFAEL WV00277 CARRANZA HECTOR WV00538 CORULO LUIS PABLO WV00061 CRUCES NICOLÁS WV00277 DUARTE DIEGO MARTIN WV00363 GONZALEZ MARCELO WV00538 LANDOLFI LUCAS ALFREDO WV00363 Martín Kovalovsky Gustavo WV00363 MOLINA MARCELO EDUARDO WV00511 MONTRASI MARIO DANIEL WV00543 MORALES JOSE WV00277 PUNTILLO PABLO MARCELO WV00061 Armenia Judo Federation ARM (blank) SARGSYAN ARMEN WV00512 [email protected] ARAKELYAN TARON WV00289 Australia Judo Federation AUS (blank) CUTAJAR MICHAEL WV00480 FRANKOWSKI KRISTOF WV00480 MCAVINEY KENNETH WV00480 Austrian Judo Federation AUT JC Wallern LOOS CLAUDIA WV00223 JC Yama Arashi Wien MILENKOVIC OLIVERA WV00223 JK Oberpullendorf HACKL CHRISTIAN WV00223 RASZTOVITS KORNELIA WV00223 JK Raika Krems CHUDIK PETER WV00223 Judo Union Raiffeisen Osttirol WOLSEGGER MICHAEL WV00223 (blank) HANBAUER HOLGER WV00227 HIERMANN SONJA WV00291 JUNGWIRTH Gerold WV00540 LAMPRECHT ANDREA WV00421 BOOKING VETERANS Page 1 of 40 RESERVAS VETERANOS Row Labels NOM CLUB Given Name Nº BOOKING Austrian Judo Federation AUT LAMPRECHT MARCO WV00421 PICHL Max WV00540 REINHOLD KURZ WV00395 REISCHER Andreas WV00540 SCHNABEL GOTTFRIED WV00312 Azerbaijan Judo Federation AZE (blank) ABBASOV AZAD WV00379 ALAKBAROV INTIGAM WV00379 ASGAROV AZAR WV00379 ASGAROV SEYFAL WV00379 BAGHIROV ZAUR WV00379 BUDAGOV VUGAR WV00379 FATIYEV YAMAN WV00379 HASANOV TARLAN WV00379 HUSEYNOV VUGAR WV00379 HUSEYNOV -
01 ADAMS 2014 LABORATORY REPORT Executive Summary.Xlsx
2014 Anti-Doping Testing Figures Report Please click on the sub-report title to access it directly. To print, please insert the pages indicated below. Laboratory Report – pp. 2-16 (15 pages) Sport Report – pp. 18-65 (47 pages) Testing Authority Report – pp. 66-172 (106 pages) ABP Report-Blood Analysis – pp. 173-202 (29 pages) 2014 Anti‐Doping Testing Figures by Laboratory ____________________________________________________________________________________ 2014 Anti‐Doping Testing Figures Samples Analyzed and Reported by Accredited Laboratories in ADAMS Table of Contents Total Samples Analyzed Table 1 : Total Samples Analyzed (All Sports) Table 2 : Comparison of Years 2009 to 2014 ‐ Olympic and Non‐Olympic Figures Table 3 : Summary ‐ Total Samples Analyzed Table 4 : Summary ‐ Samples Analyzed per Laboratory (as reported in ADAMS) Table 5 : Summary ‐ Samples Analyzed per Laboratory (not reported in ADAMS) Table 6 : Total IC and OOC Samples Analyzed per Laboratory (as reported in ADAMS) Table 7 : Total IC and OOC Samples Analyzed per Laboratory (not reported in ADAMS) Tests Conducted: GC/C/IRMS, hGH, HBOCs, HBT Table 8 : GC/C/IRMS and ESA Tests Conducted in Urine per Laboratory Table 9 : ESAs and hGH Tests Conducted in Blood per Laboratory Table 10 : HBT (Transfusion) and HBOCs Tests Conducted in Blood per Laboratory Substances Identified Table 11 : Summary ‐ Substances Identified as AAFs in Each Drug Class in ADAMS (All Sports) Table 12 : Summary ‐ Substances Identified as ATFs in Each Drug Class in ADAMS (All Sports) Table 13 : Substances -
2018 NADA Jahresbericht EN
The foundation National Anti Doping Agency of Germany (NADA) is the relevant institution for clean sport in Germany. It works nationally and internationally to promote fairness, transparency and equal opportunities for all athletes. Its tasks comprise implementation of a standardised testing programme for Germany, execution of education and doping preven- tion measures, issuing Therapeutic Use Exemptions and answering medical inquiries, providing legal advice for federa- tions and athletes, as well as international cooperation. NADA thus essentially contributes to preserving value in sports. In July 2002, NADA was founded with a festive act in the Old City Hall of Bonn and has been recognised by the foundati- on supervisory authority on 21st November in the same year. Since then, it has been pursuing its valuable mission and supports the athletes who honestly pursue their sport. As a non-profit foundation under public law, financed according to the stakeholder model, it is an independent body. NADA opposes doping in sports nationally and internationally alike. For the future of sport. For Germany as a sport nation. For clean athletes, for transparent success and honest results. FOR CLEAN PERFORMANCE – this is NADA’s vision. This is what brought the initiative „GIVE EVERYTHING, TAKE NOTHING“ to life. It serves as a platform for everyone who wants to commit to the cause of clean sport. For more information on NADA, see www.nada.de. Imprint National Anti Doping Agency of Germany (NADA). Heussallee 38. 53111 Bonn. www.nada.de Printed by Druckerei Franz Paffenholz GmbH . Königstraße 82 . 53332 Bornheim NADA Material No. 76, May 2019, Number of copies 1.000 The masculine designations for persons and job titles refer to men and women equally.