National Socialist Model Enterprise”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Socialist Model Enterprise” 3 The “National Socialist Model Enterprise” Though the seizure of power by the National Socialists on 30 January 1933 did not attract much attention in the Kaiser Wilhelm Society or give particular cause for concern, it was certainly apparent to a man with clear political insight, like Haber, that this regime change would have significant consequences. In a letter to his friend and colleague, Richard Willstätter, from 24 February 1933, in addition to lamenting several personal problems, Haber reported “a feeling of disquiet with regards to the future.”1 Haber’s disquiet could only have increased in the coming days. Three days later the Reichstag burned. This introduced a state of emergency that was the pretext for the Enabling Act, the overriding of German constitu- tional law and the systematic persecution of political opponents and dissidents – primarily Communists in the beginning, then Social Democrats, trade unionists and leftwing intellectuals as well. However, political developments were not the only cause for concern at the time. The military also tried to take advantage of the rapid political changes, pushing forward plans for a secret central military chemical research institute. The primary party responsible was the Army Ord- nance Office (Heereswaffenamt), which had already funded secret research into poisonous gases by Göttingen chemist Gerhart Jander. The Prussian Ministry of Culture, led by Bernhard Rust, and the Reich Ministry for Home Affairs, led by Wilhelm Frick, both of whom were amongst Hitler’s Guard “Old Fighters,”also sup- ported plans to offer Jander better and broader research opportunities in Berlin, as he had only a modest laboratory in Göttingen. This also fulfilled a promise Hitler had made to Jander; Jander had been assured a promotion should the National Socialists come to power.2 Haber’s institute came to play a central role in these plans because of its chemical weapons research during the First World War. It also appears that Haber knew about the proposal relatively early in its development, having been asked in February of 1933 about possible locations for such an insti- tute. As the “father of chemical warfare,” Haber had no fundamental objections to such an institute nor to ramping up research into chemical weapons in Germany, but he wanted to protect his own institute from being taken over by the military and the new government. Hence, he argued that Dahlem was not a suitable loca- tion for an armaments research institute because the area had become densely populated with villas in the years since the First World War, and he recommended that the research facility be located near the gas plant in Breloh instead. 1Werner,HaberWillstätter, p. 123. 2 Szöllösi-Janze, Haber, p. 652. 3 The “National Socialist Model Enterprise” Fig. 3.1. Institute grounds circa 1939. Notice the dedicationto Haber around the “Haber Linden” has been removed. There was an inspection of possible premises for the new institute on April 11 – not, as it turned out, of the gas plant in Breloh but of the former Prussian Research Institute for Hygiene and Immunology on Garystrasse in Dahlem, which had not been used since the death of its director. The idea of refitting this institute also appears to have been provided by Haber, since after the inspection Jander voiced his suspicion that Haber had only suggested the Hygiene institute, which was small and unsuitable for the proposed research, to prevent them taking over the more generous rooms of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.3 Ousters and Reorganizations Haber’s institute was not the only target of intrigues by the new regime and the military; the entire KWG became a focus for National Socialist revisions of Ger- man science policy. Given that a significant share of its investment capital came from Jewish donors, a considerable number of its senators were Jewish and many Jewish scientists had made the most of the career opportunities offered by its non-university research institutes, the Kaiser Wilhelm Society came to be seen in National Socialist circles as under Jewish influence, even “part of the Jewish clan.” To quote Philipp Lenard, a long-standing Nazi and the father of the Deutsche 3 GSTA, Bl. 33. 90 Ousters and Reorganizations Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service “The Reich Government has enacted the following Law … § 3 (1) Civil servants who are not of Aryan descent are to be retired; … § 4 Civil servants whose pre- vious political activities afford no assur- ance that they will at all times give their fullest support to the national state, can be dismissed from the service.” This law, promulgated on 7 April 1933, served to enforce the political conformity of civil servants and formed an early peak in the persecution and disenfranchisement of citizens of Jew- ish descent in Germany. As there were no strict regulatory statutes attached, the law was also used as a basis for the dismissal of privately employed as well as self-employed professionals such as physicians and lawyers. The so- called “Paragraph on Aryans” allowed – until the Nürnberg Laws of 1935 – the exemption of civil servants who entered service before WWI, WWI frontline sol- diers and civil servants whose fathers or sons fell in WWI. Since the KWG was a private organization, the law applied only to those of its institutes that received more than half of their funding from the state. Such institutes were then treated like universities or state research institutions, and this was in fact the case for Haber’s institute. On 27 April 1933, the General Administration of the KWG sent out directives to the institutes requesting that their members fill out ques- tionnaires about their descent and political allegiance. Dismissals were issued based on the evaluation of these questionnaires. In the KWG, there were 126 dismissals, or about 11%; the KWI for Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry was affected more adversely than any other KWG institute. German universities lost on average about a third of their faculty as a conse- quence of the Law, but there were substantial disciplinary and regional differences. For instance the universities of Rostock or Tübingen remained essentially intact, as the spirit of anti-Semitism endemic at these universities had tacitly precluded appoint- ments of Jewish faculty even before 1933. On the other hand, liberal universities, such as Berlin or Frankfurt University, were affected so strongly that their international rep- utation and academic status were considerably damaged. Disciplinary differences were also significant: disciplines such as theoretical physics or art history largely relocated to Anglo-Saxon countries, whereby the forced migration of figures such as Albert Einstein or Aby Warburg represented but the tip of the iceberg. 91 3 The “National Socialist Model Enterprise” Physik movement, “this entirely Jewish affair simply needs to be gotten rid of.” His colleague, Johannes Stark, wanted a “new spirit” to be imposed upon the Society at the very least. The Prussian Minister of Culture expressed a similar sentiment, which had more serious bureaucratic implications. It was hardly a coincidence, given the grounds for their criticism of the KWG, that they came to focus much of their attention on Haber’s institute. As a result, in the following years, the Institute would become a textbook example of National Socialist science policy.4 The Institute had the highest share of “non-Aryan” permanently-employed sci- entists of any KWG. This had been a cause for public debate even during the Weimar Republic, and in spring of 1933, it led to denunciations and attracted other forms of unwanted attention from the Party and the ministerial bureau- cracy.5 The landmark “Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service” was passed on 7 April 1933. In light of this law, on April 21, the personnel officer of the Ministry of Culture, Johannes Achelis, threatened to post a State Commis- sioner at the KWG, an act which would have threatened the very existence of the Society, if the KWI for Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry did not imme- diately respond to the new legislation and fundamentally change its staff by the end of the Easter break.6 It is difficult to assess accurately whether this was an expression of the anti-Semitic policies of the government or the ambitions of the military with respect to its plans to use the Institute for weapons research. Regard- less, the Civil Service Law became the gateway for Jander and his backers to take over the Institute. Initially, the KWG’s General Administration heeded the ministerial demands and pressured Haber to do the same. The institute was required to make immediate and significant changes to its personnel. According to a memo from Achelis’s this was the only way “to keep leading intellectuals, should they be Jewish.”This technique was part of the Society’s strategy of “self-adjustment” or “Selbstgleichschaltung.” By anticipating and obediently following the minutiae of state requirements, they hoped to avoid serious National Socialist interventions, such as the appointment of a State Commissioner at the KWG, and retain as much institutional auton- omy as possible. Enforcing the Civil Service Law was a central element in the KWG self-adjustment policy, as were aligning Society research activities with the expectations set by government policy and reorganizing the Senate and other governing bodies. The hope was that by strictly implementing the law in the mid- dle and lower ranks of its staff, the Society would be granted permission to keep its preeminent Jewish scientists. Max Planck, President of the KWG, expressed this view in May 1933 on his first official visit to Hitler. He not only said that getting rid of important scientists, such as Haber, would damage German sci- ence and Germany as a whole, but added “that there are, in fact, different types 4 Cf.
Recommended publications
  • Lesson 12: Handout 4, Document 1 German Youth in the 1930S: Selected Excerpted Documents
    Lesson 12: Handout 4, Document 1 German Youth in the 1930s: Selected excerpted documents Changes at School (Excerpted from “Changes at School,” pp. 175–76 in Facing History and Ourselves: Holocaust and Human Behavior ) Ellen Switzer, a student in Nazi Germany, recalls how her friend Ruth responded to Nazi antisemitic propaganda: Ruth was a totally dedicated Nazi. Some of us . often asked her how she could possibly have friends who were Jews or who had a Jewish background, when everything she read and distributed seemed to breathe hate against us and our ancestors. “Of course, they don’t mean you,” she would explain earnestly. “You are a good German. It’s those other Jews . who betrayed Germany that Hitler wants to remove from influence.” When Hitler actually came to power and the word went out that students of Jewish background were to be isolated, that “Aryan” Germans were no longer to associate with “non-Aryans” . Ruth actually came around and apologized to those of us to whom she was no longer able to talk. Not only did she no longer speak to the suddenly ostracized group of class - mates, she carefully noted down anybody who did, and reported them. 12 Purpose: To deepen understanding of how propaganda and conformity influence decision-making. • 186 Lesson 12: Handout 4, Document 2 German Youth in the 1930s: Selected excerpted documents Propaganda and Education (Excerpted from “Propaganda and Education,” pp. 242 –43 in Facing History and Ourselves: Holocaust and Human Behavior ) In Education for Death , American educator Gregor Ziemer described school - ing in Nazi Germany: A teacher is not spoken of as a teacher ( Lehrer ) but an Erzieher .
    [Show full text]
  • Ein Bisher Unbekanntes Zeitzeugnis
    N. T. M. 16 (2008) 103–115 0036-6978/08/010103–13 OUND DOI 10.1007/S00048-007-0277-7 © 2008 BIRKHÄUSER VERLAG, BASEL F & OST /L UNDSTÜCK Ein bisher unbekanntes Zeitzeugnis. F Otto Warburgs Tagebuchnotizen von Februar–April 1945 Kärin Nickelsen Warburg’s diary notes February–April 1945 Personal notes in the form of a diary, written by the German cell biologist Otto Warburg in the weeks before the collapse of Germany’s Third Reich (Feb.-April 1945), were found at the end of one of his labo- ratory notebooks, which are preserved in the Archives of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. These notes are unique in form and content: there seem to be no other surviving diary notes of this type. Written from a very personal perspective, they provide a detailed account of how Warburg experienced local events in this decisive and turbulent period. Furthermore, they clearly demonstrate Warburg’s embittered attitude towards some of his long-standing collaborators, whom he suspected of having denounced him to the Nazi authorities. In this paper, Warburg’s notes are fully transcribed and integrated into the historical context. Keywords: Otto Warburg, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Society, National Socialism, diary notes Schlüsselwörter: Otto Warburg, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft, Nationalsozialismus, Tagebuchnotizen | downloaded: 29.9.2021 Otto Warburg (1883–1970) ist in der Wissenschaftsgeschichte vor allem bekannt für seine bahnbrechenden Arbeiten zur Zellatmung, für die ihm 1931 der Nobelpreis verliehen wurde.1 In anderen Kontexten wiederum ist er bekannt als einer der ganz wenigen Wissenschaftler jüdischer Abstam- mung, die während der gesamten Zeit des Nationalsozialismus in Amt und Würden blieben: Nicht nur wurde Warburg nicht deportiert, er blieb bis 1945 Direktor des Kaiser-Wilhelm-Instituts (KWI) für Zellphysiologie in Berlin-Dahlem.2 Unter anderem stand er eigenen Angaben zufolge bis 1937 unter dem persönlichen Schutz von Friedrich Glum, damals Generaldirektor der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft (Werner 1991: 284).
    [Show full text]
  • Famous Physicists Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh
    Fun Quiz FAMOUS PHYSICISTS HIMANSU SEKHAR FATESINGH 1. The first woman to 6. He first succeeded in receive the Nobel Prize in producing the nuclear physics was chain reaction. a. Maria G. Mayer a. Otto Hahn b. Irene Curie b. Fritz Strassmann c. Marie Curie c. Robert Oppenheimer d. Lise Meitner d. Enrico Fermi 2. Who first suggested electron 7. The credit for discovering shells around the nucleus? electron microscope is often a. Ernest Rutherford attributed to b. Neils Bohr a. H. Germer c. Erwin Schrödinger b. Ernst Ruska d. Wolfgang Pauli c. George P. Thomson d. Clinton J. Davisson 8. The wave theory of light was 3. He first measured negative first proposed by charge on an electron. a. Christiaan Huygens a. J. J. Thomson b. Isaac Newton b. Clinton Davisson c. Hermann Helmholtz c. Louis de Broglie d. Augustin Fresnel d. Robert A. Millikan 9. He was the first scientist 4. The existence of quarks was to find proof of Einstein’s first suggested by theory of relativity a. Max Planck a. Edwin Hubble b. Sheldon Glasgow b. George Gamow c. Murray Gell-Mann c. S. Chandrasekhar d. Albert Einstein d. Arthur Eddington 10. The credit for development of the cyclotron 5. The phenomenon of goes to: superconductivity was a. Carl Anderson b. Donald Glaser discovered by c. Ernest O. Lawrence d. Charles Wilson a. Heike Kamerlingh Onnes b. Alex Muller c. Brian D. Josephson 11. Who first proposed the use of absolute scale d. John Bardeen of Temperature? a. Anders Celsius b. Lord Kelvin c. Rudolf Clausius d.
    [Show full text]
  • Florian Schmaltz. Kampfstoff-Forschung Im
    Florian Schmaltz. Kampfstoff-Forschung im Nationalsozialismus: Zur Kooperation von Kaiser-Wilhelm- Instituten, Militär und Industrie.Geschichte der Kaiser-Wilhelm- Gesellschaft im Nationalsozialismus. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2005. 676 pp. Illustrations. EUR 39.00 (paper), ISBN 9783892448808. Wolfgang Schieder and Achim Trunk, eds. Adolf Butenandt und die Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft: Wissenschaft, Industrie und Politik im Dritten Geschichte der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft im Nationalsozialismus. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2004. 456 pp. Table of contents. EUR 34.00 (paper), ISBN 9783892447528. Reviewed by Avraham Barkai, Leo Baeck Institute. Published by H-German (January,2007) Belated Confrontation Tw o generations after the fall of the "Third Rürup and Wolfgang Schieder.InJune 2001, the Reich" at the hands of the Allied victors, German president of the Max Planck Gesellschaft (MPG), public opinion, as far as reflected in the media, Hubert Markl, announced its first publications, seems to have faced the uneasy recognition that before an audience that included survivors of Hitler and his regime, its policy, its war and its Auschwitz as invited guests, in a remarkable atrocious crimes were based not only on broad speech, stating: "For way too long, manyquestions consent but also on the willing cooperation and were not asked; for way too long manyquestions welcome of its "benefits" by the greater part of the remained uninvestigated and only dealt with by German people. Since the early 1990s outsiders; ... For too long, colleagues supported governmental, municipal and other public agencies each other by remaining silent and not asking have created commissions that have unearthed questions instead of opening the door to honest proof of such acceptance and have broadened our investigation that was needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Favorite Chemists?
    ability and on uncertainty evaluation of chemical mea- surement results. Participants can take this expertise back to their home countries and/or become regional coordinators for IMEP in their respective countries. In collaboration with EUROMET and CCQM, IMEP samples are offered for the organization of EUROMET key or supplementary comparisons and, where appro- priate, for the organization of CCQM key comparisons or pilot studies. In its role as a neutral, impartial international evalu- ation program, IMEP displays existing problems in chemical measurement. IRMM is dedicated to tackling this problem and will, where possible, collaborate with international bodies, education and accreditation au- thorities, and NMIs to achieve more reliable measure- ments and contribute to setting up an internationally structured measurement system. Ellen Poulsen (Denmark) preparing graphs for the IMEP-9 participants’ report on trace elements in water. Europe’s Favorite Chemists? Choosing Europe’s Top 100 Chemists: birth of Christ is quite forgotten in general. An addi- A Difficult Task tional irony lies in the fact that recent evidence from history, archaeology, and astronomy suggests a birthdate This article by Prof. Colin Russell (Department of His- about seven years earlier, so the real millennium came tory of Science and Technology, Open University, and went unnoticed in the early 1990s. However that Milton Keynes, England MK6 7AA, UK) was com- may be, the grand spirit of revelry and bonhomie can- missioned by Chemistry in Britain and published by not be quenched by such mundane considerations, and that magazine in Vol. 36, pp. 50–52, February 2000. celebration there shall be. Nor are societies to be left The list of Europe’s 100 distinguished chemists was behind in the general euphoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Racial State
    Beyond the Racial State Rethinking Nazi Germany Edited by DEVIN 0. PENDAS Boston College MARK ROSEMAN Indiana University and · RICHARD F. WETZELL German Historical Institute Washington, D.C. GERMAN lflSTORICAL INSTITUTE Washington, D.C. and CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS I Racial Discourse, Nazi Violence, and the Limits of the Racial State Model Mark Roseman It seems obvious that the Nazi regime was a racial state. The Nazis spoke a great deal about racial purity and racial difference. They identified racial enemies and murdered them. They devoted considerable attention to the health of their own "race," offering significant incentives for marriage and reproduction of desirable Aryans, and eliminating undesirable groups. While some forms of population eugenics were common in the interwar period, the sheer range of Nazi initiatives, coupled with the Nazis' willing­ ness to kill citizens they deemed physically or mentally substandard, was unique. "Racial state" seems not only a powerful shorthand for a regime that prioritized racial-biological imperatives but also above all a pithy and plausible explanatory model, establishing a strong causal link between racial thinking, on the one hand, and murderous population policy and genocide, on the other. There is nothing wrong with attaching "racial. state" as a descriptive label tci the Nazi regime. It successfully connotes a regime that both spoke a great deal about race and acted in the name of race. It enables us to see the links between a broad set of different population measures, some positively discriminatory, some murderously eliminatory. It reminds us how sttongly the Nazis believed that maximizing national power depended on managing the health and quality of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernest Rutherford and the Accelerator: “A Million Volts in a Soapbox”
    Ernest Rutherford and the Accelerator: “A Million Volts in a Soapbox” AAPT 2011 Winter Meeting Jacksonville, FL January 10, 2011 H. Frederick Dylla American Institute of Physics Steven T. Corneliussen Jefferson Lab Outline • Rutherford's call for inventing accelerators ("million volts in a soap box") • Newton, Franklin and Jefferson: Notable prefiguring of Rutherford's call • Rutherfords's discovery: The atomic nucleus and a new experimental method (scattering) • A century of particle accelerators AAPT Winter Meeting January 10, 2011 Rutherford’s call for inventing accelerators 1911 – Rutherford discovered the atom’s nucleus • Revolutionized study of the submicroscopic realm • Established method of making inferences from particle scattering 1927 – Anniversary Address of the President of the Royal Society • Expressed a long-standing “ambition to have available for study a copious supply of atoms and electrons which have an individual energy far transcending that of the alpha and beta particles” available from natural sources so as to “open up an extraordinarily interesting field of investigation.” AAPT Winter Meeting January 10, 2011 Rutherford’s wish: “A million volts in a soapbox” Spurred the invention of the particle accelerator, leading to: • Rich fundamental understanding of matter • Rich understanding of astrophysical phenomena • Extraordinary range of particle-accelerator technologies and applications AAPT Winter Meeting January 10, 2011 From Newton, Jefferson & Franklin to Rutherford’s call for inventing accelerators Isaac Newton, 1717, foreseeing something like quarks and the nuclear strong force: “There are agents in Nature able to make the particles of bodies stick together by very strong attractions. And it is the business of Experimental Philosophy to find them out.
    [Show full text]
  • Purges in Comparative Perspective: Rules for Exclusion and Inclusion in the Scientific Communityunder Political Pressure
    Purges in Comparative Perspective: Rules for Exclusion and Inclusion in the Scientific Communityunder Political Pressure Richard Beyler,Alexei Kojevnikov,and Jessica Wang* ABSTRACT During the intense political upheavalthat dominatedthe middle decades of the twentiethcentury, modem states intensifiedtheir drives to disciplinebroad sectors of society and ensuretheir political reliability.Subjected to such pressures,scien- tific institutionsfaced the challenge of admittingnew, officially mandatedcriteria into the regulationof scientificlife. We examinethe effects of these policies on the KaiserWilhelm Society in NationalSocialist Germany,the Max PlanckSociety in occupied Germanyafter 1945, the USSR Academy of Sciences throughoutthe Stalinera, and the NationalAcademy of Sciences in early cold warAmerica. In all these cases, while academicelites largelyaccepted the requiredradical changes in the rules for membershipin the scientificcommunity, they also soughtto manipu- late the processto theirown institutionaladvantage. INTRODUCTION The relationship between state power and professional autonomy has long constituted a major theme in the history of science. Throughout the eras of turmoil that defined their respective nations' politics from the 1930s through the 1950s, the states in Ger- many, the Soviet Union, and the United States became obsessively, at times para- noically, preoccupied with defining and adjudicating their citizens' political, ethnic, or moral acceptability. These concerns frequently resulted in purges from scientific institutions of persons deemed undesirable: "non-Aryans," communists, and social- ists in National Socialist Germany; "bourgeois experts" and "cosmopolites" in Stal- inist Russia; "communist sympathizers" and "subversives" in cold war America. Purges of this kind have often been understood as morality plays, with an under- standable emphasis on the victimization of the innocent by the repressive state. In what follows, we attempt to broaden the discussion by going beyond the phenomenon of purges as such.
    [Show full text]
  • Indictment Presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945)
    Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945) Caption: On 18 October 1945, the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg accuses 24 German political, military and economic leaders of conspiracy, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. Source: Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal sitting at Berlin on 18th October 1945. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, November 1945. 50 p. (Cmd. 6696). p. 2-50. Copyright: Crown copyright is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office and the Queen's Printer for Scotland URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/indictment_presented_to_the_international_military_tribunal_nuremberg_18_october_1945-en- 6b56300d-27a5-4550-8b07-f71e303ba2b1.html Last updated: 03/07/2015 1 / 46 03/07/2015 Indictment presented to the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg, 18 October 1945) INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS — AGAINST — HERMANN WILHELM GÖRING, RUDOLF HESS, JOACHIM VON RIBBENTROP, ROBERT LEY, WILHELM KEITEL, ERNST KALTEN BRUNNER, ALFRED ROSENBERG, HANS FRANK, WILHELM FRICK, JULIUS STREICHER, WALTER FUNK, HJALMAR SCHACHT, GUSTAV KRUPP VON BOHLEN UND HALBACH, KARL DÖNITZ, ERICH RAEDER, BALDUR VON SCHIRACH, FRITZ SAUCKEL, ALFRED JODL, MARTIN BORMANN, FRANZ VON PAPEN, ARTUR SEYSS INQUART, ALBERT SPEER, CONSTANTIN VON NEURATH, AND HANS FRITZSCHE,
    [Show full text]
  • THEODOR Ft5rster 1910
    THEODOR Ft5RSTER 1910 - 19714 Journal of Luminescence 12/13 (1976) 8—12 © North-Holland Publishing Company MEMORIAL FOR THE LATE PROFESSOR THEODOR FORSTER A. WELLER Max-Planck-Institut für Biophysikalische Chemie Göttingen, Fed. Rep. Germany On the 20th of May 1974 Theodor Forster died of a heart attack at the age of 64 while he was on his way to the Institute of Physical Chemistry at the University of Stuttgart whose director he had been for 23 years. In view of his numerous important and fundamental contributions to almost all aspects of luminescence, it is indeed appropriate to pay honour to the man and his work today. Theodor Forster was born on May 15, 1910, in Frankfurt, Germany. He went to school there (the same school which about 30 years before Otto Hahn had attended), and after completing his Abitur in 1929, he became a student of physics and mathe- matics at Frankfurt University. At that time there was very little red tape at German Universities. It was for in- stance possible to study physics and/or mathematics without an examination except for the final oral examination after having finished the PhD thesis. As a consequence the good student, in general, was able to finish the University in surprisingly short time; and so in 1933 at the age of 23 Theodor Förster was promoted to Dr. phil. with a thesis entitled “ZurPolarisation von Elektronen durch Reflexion” under the tutelage of E. Madelung. Still before having finished his thesis he had become an Assistant (scientific co- worker) of ProfessorKarl-Friedrich Bonhoeffer.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred O. C. Nier
    CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION ALFRED O. C. NIER Transcript of Interviews Conducted by Michael A. Grayson and Thomas Krick at University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota on 7, 8, 9, and 10 April 1989 (With Subsequent Corrections and Additions) ACKNOWLEDGMENT This oral history is one in a series initiated by the Chemical Heritage Foundation on behalf of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. The series documents the personal perspectives of individuals related to the advancement of mass spectrometric instrumentation, and records the human dimensions of the growth of mass spectrometry in academic, industrial, and governmental laboratories during the twentieth century. This project is made possible through the generous support of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry Upon Alfred O.C. Nier’s death in 1994, this oral history was designated Free Access. Please note: Users citing this interview for purposes of publication are obliged under the terms of the Chemical Heritage Foundation Oral History Program to credit CHF using the format below: Alfred O.C. Nier, interview by Michael A. Grayson and Thomas Krick at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 7-10 April 1989 (Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation, Oral History Transcript # 0112). Chemical Heritage Foundation Oral History Program 315 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 The Chemical Heritage Foundation (CHF) serves the community of the chemical and molecular sciences, and the wider public, by treasuring the past, educating the present, and inspiring the future. CHF maintains a world-class collection of materials that document the history and heritage of the chemical and molecular sciences, technologies, and industries; encourages research in CHF collections; and carries out a program of outreach and interpretation in order to advance an understanding of the role of the chemical and molecular sciences, technologies, and industries in shaping society.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of Nazi Cultural Policy and Institutions Responsible for Its
    Kultura i Edukacja 2014 No 6 (106), s. 173–192 DOI: 10.15804/kie.2014.06.10 www.kultura-i-edukacja.pl Sylwia Grochowina, Katarzyna Kącka1 Foundations of Nazi Cultural Policy and Institutions Responsible for its Implementation in the Period 1933 – 1939 Abstract The purpose of this article is to present and analyze the foundations and premises of Nazi cultural policy, and the bodies responsible for its imple- mentation, the two most important ones being: National Socialist Society for German Culture and the Ministry of National Enlightenment and Propa- ganda of the Reich. Policy in this case is interpreted as intentional activity of the authorities in the field of culture, aimed at influencing the attitudes and identity of the population of the Third Reich. The analysis covers the most important documents, statements and declarations of politicians and their actual activity in this domain. Adopting such a broad perspective al- lowed to comprehensively show both the language and the specific features of the messages communicated by the Nazi authorities, and its impact on cultural practices. Key words Third Reich, Nazi, cultural policy, National Socialist Society for German Culture, Ministry of National Enlightenment and Propaganda of the Reich 1 Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Polnad 174 Sylwia Grochowina, Katarzyna Kącka 1. INTRODUCTION The phenomenon of culture is one of the most important distinctive features of individual societies and nations. In a democratic social order, creators of culture can take full advantage of creative freedom, while the public can choose what suits them best from a wide range of possibilities. Culture is also a highly variable phenomenon, subject to various influences.
    [Show full text]