Friends of Florham – Spring 2004
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
RETROSPECTIVE BOOK REVIEWS by Esley Hamilton, NAOP Board Trustee
Field Notes - Spring 2016 Issue RETROSPECTIVE BOOK REVIEWS By Esley Hamilton, NAOP Board Trustee We have been reviewing new books about the Olmsteds and the art of landscape architecture for so long that the book section of our website is beginning to resemble a bibliography. To make this resource more useful for researchers and interested readers, we’re beginning a series of articles about older publications that remain useful and enjoyable. We hope to focus on the landmarks of the Olmsted literature that appeared before the creation of our website as well as shorter writings that were not intended to be scholarly works or best sellers but that add to our understanding of Olmsted projects and themes. THE OLMSTEDS AND THE VANDERBILTS The Vanderbilts and the Gilded Age: Architectural Aspirations 1879-1901. by John Foreman and Robbe Pierce Stimson, Introduction by Louis Auchincloss. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991, 341 pages. At his death, William Henry Vanderbilt (1821-1885) was the richest man in America. In the last eight years of his life, he had more than doubled the fortune he had inherited from his father, Commodore Cornelius Vanderbilt (1794-1877), who had created an empire from shipping and then done the same thing with the New York Central Railroad. William Henry left the bulk of his estate to his two eldest sons, but each of his two other sons and four daughters received five million dollars in cash and another five million in trust. This money supported a Vanderbilt building boom that remains unrivaled, including palaces along Fifth Avenue in New York, aristocratic complexes in the surrounding countryside, and palatial “cottages” at the fashionable country resorts. -
Family Law Section Chair Mitchell Y
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION Family Law Section Chair Mitchell Y. Cohen, Esq. Johnson & Cohen LLP White Plains Program Co-Chairs Rosalia Baiamonte, Esq. Gassman Baiamonte Gruner, P.C. Garden City NYSBA Dylan S. Mitchell, Esq. Blank Rome LLP New York City Family Law Section Peter R. Stambleck, Esq. Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP Summer Meeting New York City Family Law Section The Newport Marriott Hotel CLE Committee Co-Chairs Rosalia Baiamonte, Esq. 25 Americas Cup Ave. Gassman Baiamonte Gruner, PC Garden City Newport, RI Henry S. Berman, Esq. Berman Frucco Gouz Mitchel & Schub PC July 13–16, 2017 White Plains Charles P. Inclima, Esq. Inclima Law Firm, PLLC Rochester Peter R. Stambleck, Esq. Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP New York City Under New York’s MCLE rule, this program may qualify for UP Bruce J. Wagner, Esq. TO 6.5 MCLE credits hours in Areas of Professional Practice. This McNamee, Lochner, Titus & program is not transitional and is not suitable for MCLE credit for Williams, P.C. newly-admitted attorneys. Albany SCHEDULE OF EVENTS Thursday, July 13 9:00 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Officers Meeting 12:00 p.m. Registration and Exhibits — South Foyer 2:00 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Executive Committee Meeting — Salons II, III, IV 6:00 p.m. – 10:00 p.m. Kid’s Dinner & Activities — Portsmouth Room 6:15 p.m. Shuttle will leave for the reception/dinner at the Newport Yachting Center (Bohlin); The shuttle will run a continuous loop 6:30 p.m. – 9:30 p.m. Reception and lobster bake at the Newport Yachting Center (Bohlin) Friday, July 14 7:30 a.m. -
GORHAM BUILDING, 390 Fifth Avenue, Aka 386-390 Fifth Avenue and 2-6 West 36Th Street, Manhattan
Landmarks Preservation Commission December 15, 1998, Designation List 300 LP-2027 GORHAM BUILDING, 390 Fifth Avenue, aka 386-390 Fifth Avenue and 2-6 West 36th Street, Manhattan. Built 1904-1906; architect Stanford White of McKim, Mead and White. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 837, Lot 48. On September 15, 1998, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Gorham Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Seven witnesses representing Manhattan Community Board 5, the Murray Hill Association, the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Beaux Arts Alliance, the Society for the Architecture of the City, the Municipal Art Society, and the Historic Districts Council spoke in favor of designation. The owner of the building submitted a letter asking that the hearing be adjourned to another date. The hearing was closed with the proviso that it could be reopened at a later date if the owner wished to testify. The owner subsequently declined to do so. There were no speakers in opposition to this designation. The Commission also has received a letter in support of the designation from a local resident. Summary This elegant commercial building, constructed in 1904-05 for the Gorham Manufacturing Company, contained its wholesale and retail showrooms, offices, and workshops. Designed by Stanford White of the prominent architectural firm of McKim, Mead & White, the eight-story building is an adaptation of an early Florentine Renaissance sty le palazzo incorporating a two-story arcade, a four-story mid-section, and a two-story loggia. -
Louis Comfort Tiffany: a Bibliography, Relevant to the Man, His Work, and His Oyster Bay, Long Island, Home.”
Please cite as: Spinzia, Judith Ader, “Louis Comfort Tiffany: A Bibliography, Relevant to the Man, His Work, and His Oyster Bay, Long Island, Home.” www.spinzialongislandestates.com Louis Comfort Tiffany: A Bibliography Relevant to the Man, His Work, and His Oyster Bay, Long Island, Home compiled by Judith Ader Spinzia . The Charles Hosmer Morse Museum, Winter Park, FL, has photographs of Laurelton Hall. Harvard Law School, Manuscripts Division, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, has Charles Culp Burlingham papers. Sterling Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT, has papers and correspondence filed under the Mitchell–- Tiffany papers. Savage, M. Frederick. Laurelton Hall Inventory, 1919. Entire inventory can be found in the Long Island Studies Institute, Hofstra University, Hempstead, LI. The Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe College, Cambridge, MA, has Edith Banfield Jackson papers. Tiffany & Company archives are in Parsippany, NJ. “American Country House of Louis Comfort Tiffany.” International Studio 33 (February 1908):294-96. “Artists Heaven; Long Island Estate of Louis Tiffany To Be an Artists' Home.” Review 1 (November 1, 1919):533. Baal-Teshuva, Jacob. Louis Comfort Tiffany. New York: Taschen Publishing Co., 2001. Bedford, Stephen and Richard Guy Wilson. The Long Island Country House, 1870-1930. Southampton, NY: The Parrish Art Museum, 1988. Bing, Siegfried. Artistic America, Tiffany Glass, and Art Nouveau. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, [1895-1903] 1970. [reprint, edited by Robert Koch] Bingham, Alfred Mitchell. The Tiffany Fortune and Other Chronicles of a Connecticut Family. Chestnut Hill, MA: Abeel and Leet Publishers, 1996. Brownell, William C. “The Younger Painters of America.” Scribner's Monthly July 1881:321-24. Burke, Doreen Bolger. -
H. H. Richardson's House for Reverend Browne, Rediscovered
H. H. Richardson’s House for Reverend Browne, Rediscovered mark wright Wright & Robinson Architects Glen Ridge, New Jersey n 1882 Henry Hobson Richardson completed a mod- flowering, brief maturity, and dissemination as a new Amer- est shingled cottage in the town of Marion, overlook- ican vernacular. To abbreviate Scully’s formulation, the Iing Sippican Harbor on the southern coast of Shingle Style was a fusion of imported strains of the Eng- Massachusetts (Figure 1). Even though he had only seen it lish Queen Anne and Old English movements with a con- in a sadly diminished, altered state and shrouded in vines, in current revival of interest in the seventeenth-century 1936 historian Henry-Russell Hitchcock would neverthe- colonial building tradition in wood shingles, a tradition that less proclaim, on the walls of the Museum of Modern Art survived at that time in humble construction up and down (MoMA) in New York, that the structure was “perhaps the the New England seaboard. The Queen Anne and Old most successful house ever inspired by the Colonial vernac- English were both characterized by picturesque massing, ular.”1 The alterations made shortly after the death of its the elision of the distinction between roof and wall through first owner in 1901 obscured the exceptional qualities that the use of terra-cotta “Kent tile” shingles on both, the lib- marked the house as one of Richardson’s most thoughtful eral use of glass, and dynamic planning that engaged func- works; they also caused it to be misunderstood—in some tionally complex houses with their landscapes. -
CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY PHASE III: Chatham Borough, Chatham Township, Dover, Madison, Montville, Mount Arlington
CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY PHASE III: Chatham Borough, Chatham Township, Dover, Madison, Montville, Mount Arlington Principal Investigators: Jennifer B. Leynes Kelly E. Wiles Prepared by: RGA, Inc. 259 Prospect Plains Road, Building D Cranbury, New Jersey 08512 Prepared for: Morris County Department of Planning and Public Works, Division of Planning and Preservation Date: October 15, 2015 BOROUGH OF MADISON MUNICIPAL OVERVIEW: THE BOROUGH OF MADISON “THE ROSE CITY” TOTAL SQUARE MILES: 4.2 POPULATION: 15,845 (2010 CENSUS) TOTAL SURVEYED HISTORIC RESOURCES: 136 SITES LOST SINCE 19861: 21 • 83 Pomeroy Road: demolished between 2002-2007 • 2 Garfield Avenue: demolished between 1987-1991 • Garfield Avenue: demolished c. 1987 • Madison Golf Club Clubhouse: demolished 2007 • George Wilder House: demolished 2001 • Barlow House: demolished between 1987-1991 • Bottle Hill Tavern: demolished 1991 • 13 Cross Street: demolished between 1987-1991 • 198 Kings Road: demolished between 1987-1991 • 92 Greenwood Avenue: demolished c. 2013 • Wisteria Lodge: demolished 1988 • 196 Greenwood Avenue: demolished between 2002-2007 • 194 Rosedale Avenue: demolished c. 2013 • C.A. Bruen House: demolished between 2002-2006 • 85 Green Avenue: demolished 2015 • 21, 23, 25 and 63 Ridgedale Avenue in the Ridgedale Avenue Streetscape/Bottle Hill Historic District: demolished c. 2013 • 21 and 23 Cook Avenue in the Ridgedale Avenue Streetscape: demolished between 1995-2002 RESOURCES DOCUMENTED BY HABS/HAER/HALS: • Bottle Hill Tavern (117 Main -
Bronx Community College University Heights Campus
Bronx Community College University Heights Campus The University Heights Campus of Bronx Community College, a 19th century gem, is the first community college campus to be named a national historic landmark. Announcing the designation on Oct. 17, 2012, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar called the original buildings “a nationally significant example of Beaux-Arts architecture in the United States, and among the most important works by Stanford White, partner in McKim, Mead & White, the preeminent American architectural firm at the turn of the 20th century.” The New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission first designated the buildings a landmark in 1966. The City University of New York bought the University Heights Campus from New York University in 1973 as a new home for Bronx Community College. In 1979, the buildings joined the National Register of Historic Places. In 2012, CUNY completed Stanford White’s quadrangle – first conceived in 1892 – with the architecturally harmonious and technologically advanced North Hall and Library, designed by Robert A.M. Stern. What follows comes from the college’s National Historic Landmark application. It was written by Easton Architects, a consultant to Bronx Community College on historic preservation. The University Heights Campus is a tour-de-force of Beaux-Arts influenced American Renaissance architecture. Stanford White of the renowned firm of McKim, Mead & White designed the campus for New York University in a bucolic setting on a bluff in the Bronx overlooking the Harlem River. NYU’s desire for a more spacious and architecturally unified campus followed important design trends for academic institutions of higher learning at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth. -
BOWERY BANK of NEW YORK BUILDING, 124 Bowery (Aka 124-126 Bowery, 230 Grand Street), Manhattan Built: 1900-02; Architect(S): York & Sawyer
Landmarks Preservation Commission June 26, 2012, Designation List 457 LP-2518 BOWERY BANK OF NEW YORK BUILDING, 124 Bowery (aka 124-126 Bowery, 230 Grand Street), Manhattan Built: 1900-02; architect(s): York & Sawyer Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 470, Lot 64 On May 15, 2012, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Bowery Bank of New York Building and the proposed designation of the Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with provisions of law. Four people testified in favor of designation, including representatives of City Councilmember Margaret Chin, the Bowery Alliance of Neighbors, the Historic Districts Council, and the Metropolitan Chapter of the Victorian Society in American. The Commission has also received a letter from the owner in opposition to designation. Summary Completed in 1902, the Bowery Bank of New York is the earliest surviving building by the architectural firm of York & Sawyer in New York City. Located at the northwest corner of the Bowery and Grand Street, it is flanked on both sides by the former Bowery Savings Bank, a designated Landmark that was constructed during the years when both York and Sawyer were employed by the building’s architect, McKim Mead & White. While the neighboring facades are distinguished by massive pediments and Corinthian columns that suggest an ancient Roman temple, the straightforward monumentality of the Bowery Bank expressed its function as a modern place of work. The New York Daily Tribune praised the building when it opened, saying it “ranks with the best of our modern New York banks.” Edward P. -
The Rhode Island State House
THE RHODE ISLAND STATE HOUSE: The Competition (1890-1892) by Hilary A. Lewis Bachelor of Arts Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey 1984 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 1988 (c) Hilary A. Lewis 1988 The Author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. .Signature of author Hilary A. Lewis artment of Architecture January 15, 1988 Certified by Sta ford Anderson Professor of Architecture Thesis Supervisor Accepted by 'Julian Beinart Chairman Departmental Committee for Graduate Students OF E-THNOLOGY UBMan Rot' CONTENTS A. Contents......... .............................. .1 B. Acknowledgements. ............. ................. .2 C. Abstract......... ...............................3 I. Introduction....................................4 II. Body of the Text: The Beginnings of the Commission.... ........... 8 The Selection of McKim, Mead & White .......... 23 Following the Competition........... .......... 39 III. Conclusion.....................................44 IV. Appendices "A" The Conditions for the Competition. ....... 47 "B" Statements of the Governors........ ....... 57 Letters................................. ....... 79 McKim and Burnham...................... ...... 102 The City Plan Commission Report........ 105 Illustrations of Competing Designs..... ...... 110 V. Bibliography............................ ...... 117 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis was written under the direction of Professor Neil Levine, Chairman of the Fine Arts Department at Harvard University. Professor Levine has not only been extremely helpful with this project; he has been a wonderful teacher who has a gift for instilling his love of the subject in others. I thank him for all of his guidance. H.A.L. Cambridge 2 THE RHODE ISLAND STATE HOUSE: The Competition (1890-1892) by Hilary A. -
Friends Portrait Project Update
Friends of FRIENDSF lorham PORTRAIT PROJECT UPDATE SPRING 2018 BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRIENDS OF FLORHAM Valerie Adams Christine Adrignolo Carol Bere Samuel M. Convissor Dawn Dupak Elaine Earlywine Susan Garrubbo Beth Hennessy James Howard Jennifer Johnson Lisa MacNair Suzy Moran Antoinette C. Petrocelli Natalia Semenova Ann Wellbrock Peter Woolley Edward Zimmermann HONORARY TRUSTEES Susan Adams Linda Carrington Phyllis Conway Walter Cummins CHARLES FOLLEN MCKIM STANFORD WHITE Gabriella D’Amico The significant and enterpris- Among the portraits to be in- curator of collections, gave Emma Joy Dana ing Portrait Project, initiated in cluded in Phase II of the project Darden and Hillringhouse a Kim Dougherty 2013 by Gary Helm Darden, are those of Florham architects, tour of the club and facilitated Carol C. Knauff Linda Meister historian, associate professor access to the image of McKim. Charles Follen McKim and Stan- Audrey Parker of history, chair of the social sci- ford White, partners in the lead- In September 2017, Darden Troy Simmons ences and history department ing architectural firm of McKim, and Hillringhouse visited Box Arthur T. Vanderbilt, II and member of the Friends Mead & White, founded in 1872 Hill, the legendary country home Board, was designed to tell and joined by White in 1879. of Stanford White in St. James, UNIVERSITY LIAISONS through portraits the “history of Their work embodied the Beaux Long Island, N.Y., which was Carol Black this estate within the larger nar- Arts style imported from Paris completed in 1885. They were Christopher A. Capuano rative of American history from that brought Neoclassical forms given a tour of Box Hill by Daniel Katie Carpenter Gary Helm Darden the Gilded Age well into the to their height in the late Gilded White, great-grandson of Stan- 20th century.” Phase I, which Matthew Dikovics Age. -
VANDERBILT MAUSOLEUM, Staten Island
Landmarks Preservation Commission April 12, 2016, Designation List 487 LP-1208 VANDERBILT MAUSOLEUM, Staten Island Built: c. 1884-87; Richard Morris Hunt, architect; F. L. & J. C. Olmsted, landscape architects; John J. R. Croes, landscape engineer Landmark Site: Borough of Staten Island, Tax Map Block 934, Lot 250 in part, consisting of the entire mausoleum, its steps, and retaining walls; the hillock enclosing the mausoleum; the terrace in front of the mausoleum’s main facade and the base and walls of the terrace; the pathway leading from the terrace northeasterly, southeasterly, southwesterly, and southeasterly, beneath the arch near the southernmost entrance to the lot, to the lot boundary; the entrance arch and gates, and the adjoining stone retaining walls extending from the south face and sides of the arch northeasterly and southwesterly to the north and south lot lines; the stone retaining walls extending from the north face of the arch along both sides of a portion of the pathway; the land beneath the opening in the entrance arch; and the land upon which these improvements are sited. On September 9, 1980, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Vanderbilt Mausoleum and Cemetery and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 5). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. A representative of the trustees overseeing the property testified in opposition to the proposed designation. A representative of New Dorp Moravian Church also testified in opposition to the proposed designation. Two people spoke in favor of the proposed designation, including a representative of the Preservation League of Staten Island. -
Newport, Rhode Island As Ward Mcallister Found It
“The Glare and Glitter of that Fashionable Resort”: Newport, Rhode Island as Ward McAllister Found It By Emily Parrow A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Liberty University Lynchburg, Virginia April 2021 ‘THE GLARE AND GLITTER OF THAT FASHIONABLE RESORT’: NEWPORT, RHODE ISLAND AS WARD MCALLISTER FOUND IT by Emily Parrow Liberty University APPROVED BY: David Snead, Ph.D., Committee Chair Michael Davis, Ph.D., Committee Member Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: The Southern Connection ............................................................................................17 Chapter 2: The European Connection ............................................................................................43 Chapter 3: The New York Connection and the Era of Formality ..................................................69 Chapter 4: The New York Connection and the Era of Frivolity ..................................................93 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................130 1 Introduction “Who the devil is Ward McAllister?” The New York Sun posed to its readers in 1889, echoing “a question that has been asked more times of late than any other by reading men all over the country and even in this city.”1 The journalist observed, “In the