Salience and Defaults in Utterance Processing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Salience and Defaults in Utterance Processing Salience and Defaults in Utterance Processing Edited by Kasia M. Jaszczolt and Keith Allan Contents Contributors vii Chapter 1. Introduction Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt 1 Chapter 2. Default meanings, salient meanings, and automatic processing Kasia M. Jaszczolt 11 Chapter 3. Salient meanings: The whens and wheres Orna Peleg and Rachel Giora 35 Chapter 4. Graded salience effects on irony production and interpretation Eleni Kapogianni 53 Chapter 5. Salience in language production Istvan Kecskes 81 Chapter 6. On salience and enrichment in expressions of negation Alyson Pitts 103 Chapter 7. Understanding acronyms: The time course of accessibility Morton Ann Gernsbacher 151 Chapter 8. Graded salience: Probabilistic meanings in the lexicon Keith Allan 165 Chapter 9. Practices and defaults in interpreting disjunction Michael Haugh 189 Index 227 Contributors Keith Allan: Emeritus Professor, Linguistics Program, Monash University Vic 3800, Australia. http://www.arts.monash.edu.au/linguistics/staff/ kallan.php; [email protected] Morton Ann Gernsbacher: Vilas Research Professor and Sir Frederic Bartlett Professor of Psychology at the University of Wisconsin– Madison, USA. http://www.gernsbacherlab.org; [email protected] Rachel Giora: Professor of Linguistics, Tel Aviv University, Israel 69978; http://www.tau.ac.il/~giorar/; [email protected] Michael Haugh: Senior Lecturer in Linguistics, Griffith University, Nathan Qld 4122, Australia; http://www.griffith.edu.au/arts-languages- criminology/school-languages-linguistics/staff/dr-michael-haugh; [email protected] Kasia M. Jaszczolt: Professor of Linguistics and Philosophy of Language, Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge, CB3 9DA, UK. http://people.pwf.cam.ac.uk/kmj21; [email protected] Eleni Kapogianni: PhD Candidate,Department of Linguistics, University of CambridgeCB3 9DA, UK; [email protected] Istvan Kecskes: Professor of Linguistics and Education, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY 12222, USA; http://www.albany.edu/ ~ik692; [email protected] Orna Peleg: Research Fellow, Institute of Information Processing and De- cision Making (IIPDM), University of Haifa, Haifa 31905; http:// iipdm.haifa.ac.il/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=68 &Itemid=48; [email protected] Alyson Pitts: Lecturer in English Language and Linguistics University of Turku, FI-20014 Turun yliopisto, Finland; http://www.hum.utu.fi/ oppiaineet/englantilainenfilologia/staff/pitts.html; [email protected] Chapter 1 Introduction Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt In the last couple of decades we have witnessed great progress and the pro- liferation of approaches in post-Gricean pragmatics, aimed at providing an adequate account of utterance meaning and utterance processing. The main debates focus on the controversy around the conscious vs automatic pro- cessing of available contextual information and the controversy surrounding the distinction between literal and nonliteral meaning. This book adds some ground-breaking research to these debates. It brings the two issues together demonstrating that they are in fact two sides of the same question: the lit- eral/nonliteral distinction is closely bound with the distinction between the automatic and conscious retrieval of information. In particular, the articles in this collection focus on the concept of salient meaning as discussed in Giora’s seminal work and the concept of pragmatic defaults as utilised un- der different guises in the neo-Gricean tradition (e.g. Levinson 2000; Jaszczolt 1999, 2005, 2006, 2010a; Recanati 2004, 2010). For example Gio- ra writes: Though literal meanings tend to be highly salient, their literality is not a component of salience. The criterion or threshold a meaning has to reach to be considered salient is related only to its accessibility in memory due to such factors as frequency of use or experiential familiarity. (Giora 2003: 33) In this way evidence of direct access sheds light on what theoretical distinc- tions we should be drawing in pragmatics. In particular, it constitutes a sound argument for redrawing the literal/nonliteral distinction in order to make it reflect the processing of information – a task already begun, albeit not on the basis of experimental findings, in Recanati’s Literal Meaning (Recanati 2004) and taken further for example in Recanati 2010. Experi- mental findings are also increasingly revealing of the need for redrawing boundaries (see for example the contributing papers to Sauerland and Yatsushiro 2009). The question of literal meaning is inherently interwoven with the ques- tion of salience. The extent of this interrelation is best exemplified in the ordinary-language philosophers’ recognition of what was subsequently pop- ularised as the concept of illocutionary act, and in particular in the late- Introduction 2 Wittgensteinian (Wittgenstein 1953) slogan that meaning is use; instead of a quest for concepts as abstractions over uses that can be discussed and de- fined in isolation, it is possible that the creation of meaning in context is all there is. This common-sense idea has also slowly made its way into post- Gricean pragmatics in the form of what Recanati (2005: 189) calls ‘meaning eliminativism’ whereby concepts are constructed directly, ‘online’ with the direct help from past uses of a word in past contexts. Less radically, with the commitment to the distinction between the logical and the encyclopedic entry for concepts, relevance theorists also seem to be tacitly weakening the logical-form-based distinction between the explicit and the implicit content, recognising the powerful role of ad hoc concept-adjustment (Carston, e.g. 2002, 2010) and construing the logical entry as inference rules rather than propositional representations.1 What we are left with at the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century is a very interesting multi-faceted picture: either the literal-nonliteral distinction is utterly uninteresting because it is based on a questionable construct of context-free ‘core meaning’, or we can make it interesting by radically revising the concept of literality, allowing context to play its role directly in concept construction. At this point the consideration of salience of an interpretation proves to be very revealing. Giora’s (e.g. 2003) experimental work leading to her Graded Salience Hy- pothesis strongly suggests that salience of an interpretation maps onto its’ being foremost on our minds, which need not coincide with being literal but instead does coincide with familiarity and frequency of use. If we are to be guided by the considerations of automatic vis-à-vis conscious inferential retrieval, then it would make sense to revise the concept of literality in the 1. Cf.: On the relevance-theoretic view, what the encoded atomic concept amounts to is an address in memory or, viewed from a different perspective, a basic element of the language of thought (a monomorphemic ‘word’ in Men- talese). The content or semantics of this entity is its denotation, what it refers to in the world, and the lexical form that encodes it, in effect, inherits its de- notational semantics. This conceptual address (or “file name”) gives access to a repository of mentally represented information about the concept’s de- notation, some of which is general and some of which, such as stereotypes, applies only to particular subsets of the denotation. This information in- cludes conceptually represented assumptions and beliefs, held with varying degrees of strength, and also, in some cases at least, imagistic and/or senso- ry-perceptual representations. A distinction is standardly made in the theory between this kind of information, which is stored in the ‘encyclopaedic en- try’ associated with the concept, and the ‘logical entry’ for the concept. Log- ical entries consist of inference rules (rather than propositional representa- tions) which are, crucially, taken to be content-constitutive. (Carston 2010: 161). 3 Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt direction of, so to speak, ‘locutionary literality’ that is informed by the fast, automatic, salient arrival of some content. But it would make even more sense to construe literality as informed by the main content that the speaker intended to communicate. We can call it, say, ‘illocutionary literality’. Guided by the considerations of modelling such primary intended content, Jaszczolt’s Default Semantics (e.g. 2005, 2010b) departs from the system- based (grammar- and lexicon-based) defaults postulated in Levinson (2000), as well as from the unconstrained context-dependence of interpretations of the followers of ‘nonce-inference’ and proposes salient, default interpreta- tions which are defaults for the context and for the speaker and come from socio-cultural, epistemic, general-knowledge, and other sources. Now, if what is ‘literal’ is to be permeated with the consideration as to whether ab- stract concepts are justified tout court, then we may be left with only the latter route to pursue, acknowledging that concepts are themselves created in context. To summarize, we may thereby not be able to assess ‘how lit- eral’, in the traditional core-concept-driven sense, the interpretation is. On the other hand, ‘locutionary literality’, or ‘neo-literality’, to review and re- label Recanati’s (2004) rather convoluted typology, coincides with salience, frequency, entrenchment, frequent patterns of neural activation, depending on the approach and level of explanation at which the discussion is conduct- ed.
Recommended publications
  • The Semiotics of Images Photographic Conventions in Advertising NEDELJKOVIC Uros, Mag
    The semiotics of Images Photographic conventions in advertising NEDELJKOVIC Uros, Mag. F. Arts – PUSKAREVIC Irma, MSc University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Novi Sad Serbia 1. INTRODUCTION 3. PHOTOGRAPHY IN ADVERTISING This presentation explores semiotic power of photography in advertising. > popular for distributing propaganda messages The photographic image has become the most preferable visual tool of the mass culture on the account of its correlation with reality and, conse- > has ability to attract and hold attention quently, its ability to visually transfer cultural and social conventions. > commercial photographers use well known and popular forms ENABLE EASIER codes&forms RECEPTION BY In the world of advertising where there is tendency to minimize the noise THE VIEWER between the meaning that sender is transmitting and the meaning that the receiver might understand, the sender predicts the visual and verbal resources that a typical receiver holds and uses them to compose the 4. PRODUCTION OF MEANING THROUGH message. This composition is made possible with conventions, estab- PHOTOGRAPHIC GENRE lished principles and norms by which meaning is formed. In our investi- gation we use photography as a carrier of these visual resources with an > connection of photographic content with specific conventions of the genre overview of social dimension within advertising discourse. > selection of genre triggers connotations that the viewer holds > photography in advertising employs various genres to direct the message 2. PHOTOGRAPHIC CONVENTIONS FOR EXAMPLE > if advertiser wants to call upon the truth and sincerity, he borrows the characteristics of the documentary photography genre. SOCIALLY 1. derived from art history & ESTABLISHED cultural heritage NORMS 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Poststructuralism Understanding Movements in Modern Thought Series Editor: Jack Reynolds
    understanding poststructuralism Understanding Movements in Modern Thought Series Editor: Jack Reynolds Th is series provides short, accessible and lively introductions to the major schools, movements and traditions in philosophy and the history of ideas since the beginning of the Enlightenment. All books in the series are written for undergraduates meeting the subject for the fi rst time. Published Understanding Existentialism Understanding Virtue Ethics Jack Reynolds Stan van Hooft Understanding Poststructuralism James Williams Forthcoming titles include Understanding Empiricism Understanding Hermeneutics Robert Meyers Lawrence Schmidt Understanding Ethics Understanding Naturalism Tim Chappell Jack Ritchie Understanding Feminism Understanding Phenomenology Peta Bowden and Jane Mummery David Cerbone Understanding German Idealism Understanding Rationalism Will Dudley Charlie Heunemann Understanding Hegelianism Understanding Utilitarianism Robert Sinnerbrink Tim Mulgan understanding poststructuralism James Williams For Richard and Olive It is always about who you learn from. © James Williams, 2005 Th is book is copyright under the Berne Convention. No reproduction without permission. All rights reserved. First published in 2005 by Acumen Acumen Publishing Limited 15a Lewins Yard East Street Chesham Bucks HP5 1HQ www.acumenpublishing.co.uk ISBN 1-84465-032-4 (hardcover) ISBN 1-84465-033-2 (paperback) Work on Chapter 3 was supported by British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British
    [Show full text]
  • Donna E. West Myrdene Anderson Editors Before and Beyond Consciousness
    Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics Donna E. West Myrdene Anderson Editors Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit Before and Beyond Consciousness Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics Volume 31 Series editor Lorenzo Magnani, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy e-mail: [email protected] Editorial Board Atocha Aliseda Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Coyoacan, Mexico Giuseppe Longo Centre Cavaillès, CNRS—Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France Chris Sinha Lund University, Lund, Sweden Paul Thagard Waterloo University, Waterloo, ON, Canada John Woods University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada About this Series Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (SAPERE) publishes new developments and advances in all the fields of philosophy, epistemology, and ethics, bringing them together with a cluster of scientific disciplines and technological outcomes: from computer science to life sciences, from economics, law, and education to engineering, logic, and mathematics, from medicine to physics, human sciences, and politics. It aims at covering all the challenging philosophical and ethical themes of contemporary society, making them appropriately applicable to contemporary theoretical, methodological, and practical problems, impasses, controversies, and conflicts. The series includes monographs, lecture notes, selected contributions from specialized conferences and workshops as well as selected Ph.D. theses. Advisory Board A. Abe, Chiba, Japan A. Pereira, São Paulo, Brazil H. Andersen, Copenhagen, Denmark L.M. Pereira, Caparica, Portugal O. Bueno, Coral Gables, USA A.-V. Pietarinen, Helsinki, Finland S. Chandrasekharan, Mumbai, India D. Portides, Nicosia, Cyprus M. Dascal, Tel Aviv, Israel D. Provijn, Ghent, Belgium G.D. Crnkovic, Västerås, Sweden J. Queiroz, Juiz de Fora, Brazil M.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory
    Journal of Feminist Scholarship Volume 4 Issue 4 Spring 2013 Article 5 Spring 2013 Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory Susan Archer Mann University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Women's History Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Mann, Susan A.. 2018. "Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory." Journal of Feminist Scholarship 4 (Spring): 54-73. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs/vol4/iss4/5 This Viewpoint is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Feminist Scholarship by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory Cover Page Footnote The author wishes to thank Oxford University Press for giving her permission to draw from Chapters 1, 5, 6, 7, and the Conclusion of Doing Feminist Theory: From Modernity to Postmodernity (2012). This viewpoint is available in Journal of Feminist Scholarship: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jfs/vol4/iss4/5 Mann: Third Wave Feminism's Unhappy Marriage VIEWPOINT Third Wave Feminism’s Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory Susan Archer Mann, University of New Orleans Abstract: This article first traces the history of unhappy marriages of disparate theoretical perspectives in US feminism. In recent decades, US third-wave authors have arranged their own unhappy marriage in that their major publications reflect an attempt to wed poststructuralism with intersectionality theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualia NICHOLAS HARKNESS Harvard University, USA
    Qualia NICHOLAS HARKNESS Harvard University, USA Qualia (singular, quale) are cultural emergents that manifest phenomenally as sensuous features or qualities. The anthropological challenge presented by qualia is to theorize elements of experience that are semiotically generated but apperceived as non-signs. Qualia are not reducible to a psychology of individual perceptions of sensory data, to a cultural ontology of “materiality,” or to philosophical intuitions about the subjective properties of consciousness. The analytical solution to the challenge of qualia is to con- sider tone in relation to the familiar linguistic anthropological categories of token and type. This solution has been made methodologically practical by conceptualizing qualia, in Peircean terms, as “facts of firstness” or firstness “under its form of secondness.” Inthephilosophyofmind,theterm“qualia”hasbeenusedtodescribetheineffable, intrinsic, private, and directly or immediately apprehensible experiences of “the way things seem,” which have been taken to constitute the atomic subjective properties of consciousness. This concept was challenged in an influential paper by Daniel Dennett, who argued that qualia “is a philosophers’ term which fosters nothing but confusion, and refers in the end to no properties or features at all” (Dennett 1988, 387). Dennett concluded, correctly, that these diverse elements of feeling, made sensuously present atvariouslevelsofattention,wereactuallyidiosyncraticresponsestoapperceptions of “public, relational” qualities. Qualia were, in effect,
    [Show full text]
  • Nudge-Ansätze Beim Nachhaltigen Konsum: Ermittlung Und Entwicklung Von Maßnahmen Zum „Anstoßen“ Nachhaltiger Konsummuster Abschlussbericht
    TEXTE 69 /2017 Nudge-Ansätze beim nachhaltigen Konsum: Ermittlung und Entwicklung von Maßnahmen zum „Anstoßen“ nachhaltiger Konsummuster Abschlussbericht TEXTE 69/2017 Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit Forschungskennzahl 3714 93 303 0 UBA-FB 002451 Nudge-Ansätze beim nachhaltigen Konsum: Ermittlung und Entwicklung von Maßnahmen zum „Anstoßen“ nachhaltiger Konsummuster von Prof. Dr. Christian Thorun, Dr. Jana Diels und Dr. Max Vetter ConPolicy – Institut für Verbraucherpolitik, Berlin Prof. Dr. Lucia Reisch und Manuela Bernauer, M.A. Copenhagen Business School, Kopenhagen (DK) Zeppelin Universität, Friedrichshafen Prof. Dr. Hans-W. Micklitz Europäisches Hochschulinstitut, Florenz (I) und Prof. Dr. Kai Purnhagen Wageningen University, Wageningen (NL) Dr. Jan Rosenow und Daniel Forster Ricardo-AEA, Oxfordshire (UK) Mit freundlicher Unterstützung durch Prof. Dr. Cass R. Sunstein Harvard Law School, Cambridge (USA) Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes Impressum Herausgeber: Umweltbundesamt Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau Tel: +49 340-2103-0 Fax: +49 340-2103-2285 [email protected] Internet: www.umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt.de /umweltbundesamt Durchführung der Studie: ConPolicy – Institut für Verbraucherpolitik Crellestraße 37 10827 Berlin Abschlussdatum: August 2016 Redaktion: Fachgebiet III 1.1 Übergreifende Aspekte des Produktbezogenen Umweltschutzes, Nachhaltige Konsumstrukturen Lisa Kossolobow Publikationen als pdf: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen ISSN 1862-4359 Dessau-Roßlau, August 2017 Das diesem Bericht zu Grunde liegende Vorhaben wurde mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit unter der Forschungskennzahl 3714 93 303 0 finanziert. Die Verantwortung für den Inhalt dieser Veröffentlichung liegt bei den Autorinnen und Autoren. Kurzbeschreibung Im vorliegenden Forschungsvorhaben wird das Potential von Nudges für den Bereich des nachhaltigen Konsums mit Schwerpunkt auf ökologischen Konsum untersucht.
    [Show full text]
  • Salience in Sociolinguistics
    Salience in Sociolinguistics A quantitative approach Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorw¨urde der Philologischen Fakult¨at der Albert-Ludwigs-Universit¨at Freiburg i. Br. vorgelegt von P´eterR´acz aus Budapest Wintersemester 2012/2013 Indem wir vom Wahrscheinlichen sprechen, ist ja das Un- wahrscheinliche immer schon inbegriffen und zwar als Grenzfall des M¨oglichen, und wenn es einmal eintritt, das Unwahrschein- liche, so besteht f¨urunsereinen keinerlei Grund zur Verwunderung, zur Ersch¨utterung, zur Mystifikation. (Frisch: Homo Faber) Contents Foreword ix 1 Preliminaries 1 1.1 Aims and concepts . .2 1.1.1 On the notations . .5 1.1.2 Salience in sociolinguistics . .5 1.1.3 Salience as low probability . .9 1.2 Structure of the dissertation . 14 1.2.1 Methodology . 14 1.2.2 Chapter structure . 17 1.2.3 The case studies . 21 1.3 Concluding remarks . 28 2 Defining Salience 31 2.1 Salience as a general term . 32 2.1.1 Salience in sociolinguistics . 34 2.1.2 Salience in visual cognition . 43 2.1.3 Selective attention in hearing . 48 2.2 Operationalising sociolinguistic salience . 49 2.2.1 Preliminaries . 49 2.2.2 Defining salience . 50 2.2.3 Exemplars and transitional probabilities . 53 2.3 Concluding remarks . 59 v CONTENTS 3 Methodology 61 3.1 General considerations . 62 3.2 Step-by-step corpus editing . 65 3.3 Calculating transitional probabilities . 71 4 Definite Article Reduction 75 4.1 Background . 76 4.1.1 Details of the process . 76 4.1.2 DAR as a salient variable . 80 4.2 Analysis .
    [Show full text]
  • Sociosemiotics and Metalanguage: the Case of Translanguaging Linguistic Frontiers
    Linguistic Frontiers • 3(2) • 57—65 • 2020 DOI: 10.2478/lf-2020-0015 Linguistic Frontiers Sociosemiotics and Metalanguage: The Case of Translanguaging Original Study Anti Randviir Department of Semiotics, University of Tartu, Estonia. Received: July 2020 ; Accepted: September 2020 Abstract: The age of transdiscipinarity has brought along the fading of boundaries between disciplines. This has engaged both the fusion of metalanguages that are used for the description of cultures and sign-proce- sses, and the launch of novel proposals for metalinguistic vocabularies. In the case of the study of culture, communication and sign-processes, it is natural that all such developments are connected with the paradigm of semiotics. At times the relevant metalinguistic and methodological proposals challenge traditional semiotic vocabulary, methods and methodological truths. This has brought along the need to recall the semiotic roots of the study of semiosis and communication, and to review transdisciplinary metalanguage in order to avoid possible misinterpretations or unnecessary repetitions of the established agreements in the paradigm of se- miotics as a possible ground for transdisciplinary study of human interaction and cultural processes. Howe- ver, besides occasional theoretical confusion, the spread of the semiotic methodology and vocabulary across applied scholarship has enriched semiotics in its faculties of field studies. Keywords : sociosemiotics, metalanguage, transdisciplinarity, modality, multimodality, mediality, coding, semiosis, modelling, translanguaging. Contemporary scholarship has, both in the domain of studies were founded. Secondly, it is useful to recall the humanities and social sciences, as also in the so-called proximity of interdisciplinary studies and interdisciplinary hard sciences, passed a fairly clear transition from mono- education as proposed by American pragmatism.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing Teens and Technology: a Social Semiotic Analysis of Stock Photography and News Media Imagery
    This is a repository copy of Visualizing teens and technology: A social semiotic analysis of stock photography and news media imagery. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/151189/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Thurlow, C, Aiello, G orcid.org/0000-0002-9636-1016 and Portmann, L (2020) Visualizing teens and technology: A social semiotic analysis of stock photography and news media imagery. New Media & Society, 22 (3). pp. 528-549. ISSN 1461-4448 https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819867318 © 2019, the Author(s). This is an author produced version of a paper published in New Media & Society. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ VISUALIZING TEENS AND TECHNOLOGY 1 Visualizing teens and technology: A social semiotic analysis of stock photography and news media imagery Crispin Thurlow, Giorgia Aiello, Lara Portmann New Media & Society (2019, Online First) Abstract Previous research on verbal representations shows how the news media consistently depicts young people’s uses of digital media in a narrow, negative light.
    [Show full text]
  • Salience, Focus and Second Language Acquisition S.E
    Salience, Focus and Second Language Acquisition S.E. Carroll & Christine Shea Department of Linguistics University of Calgary [email protected] Abstract In the literature on second language acquisition, salience is assumed to automatically render input available for processing. The precise nature of “salience” is rarely clarified; it is simply assumed that prosodic constructs such as focal accent or stress are universally perceptually salient. We examined this relationship between intrinsic salience and second language learning by using focal accent to highlight familiar and unfamiliar lexical items in sentences presented to adult second language learners. If learners perceive unfamiliar focally accented words as perceptually salient, they will recognize them with greater accuracy than items without focal accent. 1. Introduction The research reported on here is part of a larger program examining the complex relationships between input, language processing and second language acquisition. It investigates the commonplace assumption in second language acquisition research that parts of the signal are inherently more prominent or salient than others and that a learner’s attention during speech processing will necessarily be drawn to those prominent parts of the input. In other words, the learner will be better able to process (i.e., analyze faster and with more accuracy) the parts of the signal that are marked in ways which result in perceptual salience, to the detriment of those which are not so marked. Upon close examination, however, many of the common claims regarding input do not stand up to scrutiny. Specifically, perceptual salience is not an objective, acoustic property of the speech signal. Instead, salience is a perceptual effect resulting from speech perception and language processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Definite Article of the English Language                 6HQLRU7KHVLV 'HSDUWPHQWRI/LQJXLVWLFV 6ZDUWKPRUH&ROOHJH 'HFHPEHU 1
    %HQMDPLQ5*HRUJH the Definite Article of the English Language 6HQLRU7KHVLV 'HSDUWPHQWRI/LQJXLVWLFV 6ZDUWKPRUH&ROOHJH 'HFHPEHU 1. Overview 1.1 Introduction The goal of this paper is to identify a viable analysis of the for use in semantic theories in ∗ the tradition of Montague (1974a,b). I shall argue that the sentiment expressed by Lewis (1983), and developed in more formal detail by von Heusinger (1997), is essentially correct, and that, when an analysis is placed in a suitable formal context, it is capable of accounting for a much greater range of phenomena than Lewis and von Heusinger consider. The basic claim is that the expression “the N” denotes the uniquely most salient N, when such an entity exists. I shall begin by enumerating every credible semantic effect attributed to “the” when used in connection with count nouns that I have encountered in the literature or noticed in the course of personal reflection on the subject. Sometimes several conflicting views on the same basic phenomenon will be condensed into one entry in the interests of compactness, and sometimes well known effects will be omitted altogether on the grounds that they seem not to be semantic at all, but to be of an entirely pragmatic, psychological, or metaphysical nature1. The decision to restrict my attention to count nouns is motivated by a desire to pick out a problem of reasonable size, and to avoid discussion of the difficult but tangential subject of the semantics of mass nouns. ∗ I would like to thank Rebecca Kuipers and David January for giving earlier drafts of this paper far more attentive readings than they were entitled to, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Welby's Influence on Russell's Turn To
    WELBY’S INFLUENCE ON RUSSELL’S TURN TO USE? SCOTT METZGER, MCMASTER UNIVERSITY [email protected] “Two really important works on logic are these [Welby’s What is Meaning? and Russell’s Principles of Mathematics]… Yet it is almost grotesque to name them together, so utterly disparate are their characters.” –Charles Sanders Peirce, Review in The Nation, CP 8.171 A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF THE CORE PROBLEM: MY MOTIVATION • Welby and Russell correspond about meaning and denotation in 1905. • Russell dismisses Welby, claiming that she misunderstands the scope of his project. The early Russell was not interested in meaning. • Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen: “In 1908 Russell confessed privately to Jourdain how he had “in the past been very rude to Welby, in refusing to go there” because he found it “quite impossible to be sincere” if he saw her. He no longer wanted “to be a party to” those philosophers encouraging Welby’s work, which in his opinion was “very wrong.”” (157) AND YET… • In his later review of Ogden & Richard’s The Meaning of Meaning, Russell writes that: “When in youth, I learned what was called “philosophy”…no one ever mentioned to me the question of “Meaning.” Later, I became acquainted with Lady Welby’s work on the subject, but failed to take it seriously. […] I have now come to believe that the order of words in time or space is an ineradicable part of much of their significance—in fact, that the reason they can express space time occurrences is that they are space-time occurrences, so that a logic independent of the accidental nature of space- time becomes an idle dream.” (Russell 109) • Also, Misak writes that, in My Philosophical Development, Russell “cites Welby and Schiller as those who sparked his interest in the topic [of meaning], although at the time they had pressed him on the point, he resisted” (Misak 143).
    [Show full text]