Molecular Phylogenetics of Caryophyllales Based on Nuclear 18S Rdna and Plastid Rbcl, Atpb, and Matk Dna Sequences1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Molecular Phylogenetics of Caryophyllales Based on Nuclear 18S Rdna and Plastid Rbcl, Atpb, and Matk Dna Sequences1 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography American Journal of Botany 89(1): 132±144. 2002. MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS OF CARYOPHYLLALES BASED ON NUCLEAR 18S RDNA AND PLASTID RBCL, ATPB, AND MATK DNA SEQUENCES1 PHILIPPE CUE NOUD,2,5 VINCENT SAVOLAINEN,2 LARS W. C HATROU,3 MARTYN POWELL,2 RENE E J. GRAYER,4 AND MARK W. C HASE2 2Molecular Systematics Section, Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS, UK; 3National Herbarium of the Netherlands, Utrecht University Branch, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and 4Biological Interaction Section, Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS, UK To study the inter- and infrafamilial phylogenetic relationships in the order Caryophyllales sensu lato (s.l.), ;930 base pairs of the matK plastid gene have been sequenced and analyzed for 127 taxa. In addition, these sequences have been combined with the rbcL plastid gene for 53 taxa and with the rbcL and atpB plastid genes as well as the nuclear 18S rDNA for 26 taxa to provide increased support for deeper branches. The red pigments of Corbichonia, Lophiocarpus, and Sarcobatus have been tested and shown to belong to the betacyanin class of compounds. Most taxa of the order are clearly grouped into two main clades (i.e., ``core'' and ``noncore'' Caryophyllales) which are, in turn, divided into well-de®ned subunits. Phytolaccaceae and Molluginaceae are polyphyletic, and Por- tulacaceae are paraphyletic, whereas Agdestidaceae, Barbeuiaceae, Petiveriaceae, and Sarcobataceae should be given familial recog- nition. Two additional lineages are potentially appropriate to be elevated to the family level in the future: the genera Lophiocarpus and Corbichonia form a well-supported clade on the basis of molecular and chemical evidence, and Limeum appears to be separated from other Molluginaceae based on both molecular and ultrastructural data. Key words: betalain; Caryophyllales; DNA evolution; matK; phylogeny. Caryophyllales sensu stricto (s.s), sometimes also called Downie and Palmer, 1994; Manhart and Rettig, 1994; Downie, Centrospermae, have long been identi®ed as a natural assem- Katz-Downie, and Cho, 1997; Fay et al., 1997; Lledo et al., blage of families (Braun, 1864; Eichler, 1876). Morphological 1998; Hoot, MagalloÂn, and Crane, 1999; Soltis, Soltis, and characters diagnostic of the group include free-central (some- Chase, 1999; Meimberg et al., 2000; Savolainen et al., 2000a, times basal) placentation, perisperm, and curved embryos (Bit- b; Soltis et al., 2000; Clement and Mabry, in press). As a trich, 1993a). Studies on pigment chemistry (reviewed in result, additional families have been shown to be related to Clement et al., 1994; see also Clement and Mabry, in press) Caryophyllales: Droseraceae, Drosophyllaceae, Nepenthaceae, have shown that all Caryophyllales families, except Cary- Plumbaginaceae, and Polygonaceae (Albert, Williams, and ophyllaceae and Molluginaceae, produce betalain pigments in- Chase, 1992; Williams, Albert, and Chase, 1994), Asteropei- stead of anthocyanins (as is the case in the rest of ¯owering aceae and Physenaceae (Morton, Karol, and Chase, 1997), An- plants). Studies of the ultrastructure of sieve-element plastids cistrocladaceae, Dioncophyllaceae, Frankeniaceae, Rhabdod- have revealed that Caryophyllales share a unique type (P3; endraceae, Simmondsiaceae, and Tamaricaceae (Fay et al., Behnke, 1994), which is characterized by a peripheral ring of 1997). These increasing data led the Angiosperm Phylogeny proteinaceous ®laments, generally surrounding a protein crys- Group (APG, 1998) to rede®ne Caryophyllales to include the tal of either globular or angular shape. Cronquist and Thorne families listed above (``noncore Caryophyllales'') in addition (1994), summarizing the data available on Caryophyllales, list- to those recognized previously (``core Caryophyllales''), a to- ed 11 families included in this order: Aizoaceae, Amarantha- tal of 26 families. The closest relatives of Caryophyllales are ceae, Basellaceae, Cactaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Chenopodi- not yet known with con®dence, although Dilleniaceae and per- aceae, Didiereaceae, Molluginaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Phytolac- haps Santalales are the most likely candidates (Hoot, Magal- caceae, and Portulacaceae. In addition, seven families were loÂn, and Crane, 1999; Soltis, Soltis, and Chase, 1999; Soltis excluded: Bataceae, Gyrostemonaceae, Plumbaginaceae, Poly- et al., 2000). gonaceae, Rhabdodendraceae, Theligonaceae, and Viviana- Despite the data available, uncertainties remain as to the ceae. delimitation of several families, their phylogenetic relation- Molecular systematic studies, starting with Giannasi et al. ships, and the placement of some enigmatic genera. Bittrich (1992), have substantially increased our knowledge of the phy- (1993a) listed six families that lack clear delimitation or valid logeny of the Caryophyllales (Albert, Williams, and Chase, synapomorphies: Amaranthaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Portula- 1992; Rettig, Wilson, and Manhart, 1992; Chase et al., 1993; caceae, Nyctaginaceae, Phytolaccaceae, and Molluginaceae. 1 Manuscript received 22 February 2001; revision accepted 27 July 2001. Generic composition of Phytolaccaceae, for example, has un- The authors thank James R. Manhart, who provided DNA of Phaulotham- dergone a continuous thinning, with the recognition of Steg- nus; Wendy L. Applequist, who provided most of the Portulacaceae samples, nospermataceae, Achatocarpaceae (as in APG, 1998), and as well as leaf tissue of Alluaudiopsis; Tom J. Mabry, who provided a copy sometimes also Petiveriaceae, Agdestidaceae, Gisekiaceae, and of his paper in press; and the late Patricia Geissler for her help in getting Barbeuiaceae (Nakai, 1942) as separate families. A morpho- funding for this study. This study was funded by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, the Royal Society (London), the Swiss NSF (31-52378.97), and the logical phylogenetic analysis of the order by Rodman et al. Academic Society of Geneva. (1984) was criticized by Hershkovitz (1989), who wrote that 5 Author for reprint requests (e-mail: [email protected]). because of several problems (mainly choice of outgroup, def- 132 January 2002] CUE NOUD ET AL.ÐMOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS OF CARYOPHYLLALES 133 inition of taxonomic units, and polymorphic characters within taxon addition with equal weights and tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) units) the results were less satisfactory than Cronquist's clas- branch swapping, with only 50 trees held at each replicate to reduce time si®cation (1981). spent in searching nonoptimal tree lengths. Using only the matK matrix, heu- In this paper, we investigate the phylogeny of the order at ristic searches did not swap to completion, therefore only 10 000 of the trees inter- and infrafamilial levels using partial sequences of the found in 200 independent replicates were retained for discussion. Internal matK plastid gene (sometimes referred to as ORF 542; Hira- support was assessed using 1000 bootstrap replicates with TBR swapping and tsuka et al., 1989). We also combined these matK sequences simple addition of taxa, with a limit of ten trees kept in each replicate. with those from plastid rbcL and atpB genes and nuclear 18S For calculation of substitution patterns, nucleotide changes for each of the rDNA to provide increased support for several deeper branch- four genes were optimized with ACCTRAN onto the four-gene tree (Delos- es of the order. In addition, the chemical nature of the red- perma being excluded for the plastid genes). Sequences of the three coding purple pigments in Corbichonia (Molluginaceae), Lophiocar- genes were translated into amino acids using MacClade 3.04 (Maddison and Maddison, 1992), and the amino acid changes were computed after optimi- pus (Phytolaccaceae), and Sarcobatus (Sarcobataceae) is re- zation onto the combined tree. ported here for the ®rst time. For chemical analysis of pigments, ;10±50 mg of dried stems of Sarcobatus vermiculatus Torr., Corbichonia decumbens (Forsk.) Exell, Adenogramma sp., MATERIALS AND METHODS and Lophiocarpus polystachyus Turcz. were cut into small pieces and extracted Sequences of the rbcL and atpB exons and 18S rDNA were taken from the for 5 min in boiling 50% aqueous methanol. The extracts were cooled, ®ltered, studies of Soltis, Soltis, and Chase (1999) and Soltis et al. (2000); all available and evaporated to dryness at 408C under vacuum. The precipitates were dis- members of the Caryophyllales from the three-gene matrix were included. solved in two drops of distilled water, and 0.5 mL of 80% aqueous methanol Alignment of 18S sequences was as in Soltis et al. (2000). In a few cases, was added to this solution. Extracts of fresh red leaves of Iresine sp. (Amar- we could not get all four sequences for the same genus (i.e., the18S rDNA anthaceae; containing betacyanins) and Papaver sp. (Papaveraceae; containing of Trichodiadema is missing, and rbcL, atpB, and 18S rDNA of Stellaria and anthocyanins) were prepared in a similar way and used for comparison. The Mollugo were combined with matK of Moehringia and Pharnaceum, respec- extracts were analyzed for the presence of anthocyanins or betacyanins in two tively). After comparisons of the published rbcL sequence of Delosperma with ways. First, we used reverse-phase, high-performance liquid chromatography those from other Aizoaceae, it was found to be too divergent and doubtful (HPLC)
Recommended publications
  • Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto De Biología, UNAM September 17-23
    Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto de Biología, UNAM September 17-23 LOCAL ORGANIZERS Hilda Flores-Olvera, Salvador Arias and Helga Ochoterena, IBUNAM ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Walter G. Berendsohn and Sabine von Mering, BGBM, Berlin, Germany Patricia Hernández-Ledesma, INECOL-Unidad Pátzcuaro, México Gilberto Ocampo, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México Ivonne Sánchez del Pino, CICY, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Thomas Borsch, BGBM, Germany Fernando O. Zuloaga, Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, Argentina Victor Sánchez Cordero, IBUNAM, México Cornelia Klak, Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa Hossein Akhani, Department of Plant Sciences, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran Alexander P. Sukhorukov, Moscow State University, Russia Michael J. Moore, Oberlin College, USA Compilation: Helga Ochoterena / Graphic Design: Julio C. Montero, Diana Martínez GENERAL PROGRAM . 4 MONDAY Monday’s Program . 7 Monday’s Abstracts . 9 TUESDAY Tuesday ‘s Program . 16 Tuesday’s Abstracts . 19 WEDNESDAY Wednesday’s Program . 32 Wednesday’s Abstracs . 35 POSTERS Posters’ Abstracts . 47 WORKSHOPS Workshop 1 . 61 Workshop 2 . 62 PARTICIPANTS . 63 GENERAL INFORMATION . 66 4 Caryophyllales 2018 Caryophyllales General program Monday 17 Tuesday 18 Wednesday 19 Thursday 20 Friday 21 Saturday 22 Sunday 23 Workshop 1 Workshop 2 9:00-10:00 Key note talks Walter G. Michael J. Moore, Berendsohn, Sabine Ya Yang, Diego F. Registration
    [Show full text]
  • Creation and Carnivory in the Pitcher Plants of Nepenthaceae and Sarraceniaceae
    OPEN ACCESS JCTS Article SERIES B Creation and Carnivory in the Pitcher Plants of Nepenthaceae and Sarraceniaceae R.W. Sanders and T.C. Wood Core Academy of Science, Dayton, TN Abstract The morphological adaptations of carnivorous plants and taxonomic distributions of those adaptations are reviewed, as are the conflicting classifications of the plants based on the adaptations, reproductive morphology, and DNA sequences. To begin developing a creationist understanding of the origin of plant carnivory, we here focus specifically on pitcher plants of Nepenthaceae and Sarraceniaceae because their popularity as cultivated curiosities has generated a literature resource amenable to baraminological analysis. Hybridization records were augmented by total nucleotide differences to assess species similarities. Nonhybridizing species falling within the molecular range of hybridizing species were included in the monobaramin of the hybridizing species. The combined data support each of the three genera of the Sarraceniaceae as a monobaramin, but the three could not be combined into a larger monobaramin. With the Nepenthaceae, the data unequivocally place 73% of the species in a single monobaramin, strongly suggesting the whole genus (and, thus, family) is a monobaramin. The lack of variation in the carnivorous habit provides no evidence for the intrabaraminic origin of carnivory from non-carnivorous plants. An array of fascinating symbiotic relationships of pitchers in some species with unusual bacteria, insects, and vertebrates are known and suggest the origin of carnivory from benign functions of the adaptive structures. However, these symbioses still do not account for the apparent complex design for carnivory characteristic of all species in the two families. Editor: J.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Lacks Stem Succulents but Is It Depauperate in Plants With
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Australia lacks stem succulents but is it depauperate in plants with crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM)? 1,2 3 3 Joseph AM Holtum , Lillian P Hancock , Erika J Edwards , 4 5 6 Michael D Crisp , Darren M Crayn , Rowan Sage and 2 Klaus Winter In the flora of Australia, the driest vegetated continent, [1,2,3]. Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), a water- crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), the most water-use use efficient form of photosynthesis typically associated efficient form of photosynthesis, is documented in only 0.6% of with leaf and stem succulence, also appears poorly repre- native species. Most are epiphytes and only seven terrestrial. sented in Australia. If 6% of vascular plants worldwide However, much of Australia is unsurveyed, and carbon isotope exhibit CAM [4], Australia should host 1300 CAM signature, commonly used to assess photosynthetic pathway species [5]. At present CAM has been documented in diversity, does not distinguish between plants with low-levels of only 120 named species (Table 1). Most are epiphytes, a CAM and C3 plants. We provide the first census of CAM for the mere seven are terrestrial. Australian flora and suggest that the real frequency of CAM in the flora is double that currently known, with the number of Ellenberg [2] suggested that rainfall in arid Australia is too terrestrial CAM species probably 10-fold greater. Still unpredictable to support the massive water-storing suc- unresolved is the question why the large stem-succulent life — culent life-form found amongst cacti, agaves and form is absent from the native Australian flora even though euphorbs.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Widespread Paleopolyploidy, Gene Tree Conflict, and Recalcitrant Relationships Among the 3 Carnivorous Caryophyllales1 4 5 Joseph F
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/115741; this version posted March 10, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 2 Widespread paleopolyploidy, gene tree conflict, and recalcitrant relationships among the 3 carnivorous Caryophyllales1 4 5 Joseph F. Walker*,2, Ya Yang2,5, Michael J. Moore3, Jessica Mikenas3, Alfonso Timoneda4, Samuel F. 6 Brockington4 and Stephen A. Smith*,2 7 8 2Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University Avenue, 9 Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA 10 3Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland St., Oberlin, Ohio 44074- 11 1097 USA 12 4Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom 13 5 Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 14 55108 15 CORRESPONDING AUTHORS: Joseph F. Walker; [email protected] and Stephen A. Smith; 16 [email protected] 17 18 1Manuscript received ____; revision accepted ______. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/115741; this version posted March 10, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 19 ABSTRACT 20 • The carnivorous members of the large, hyperdiverse Caryophyllales (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carpology and Taxonomy of Some Chinese Corispermum (Amaranthaceae S.L.)
    Phytotaxa 172 (2): 081–093 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.172.2.3 The carpology and taxonomy of some Chinese Corispermum (Amaranthaceae s.l.) ALEXANDER P. SUKHORUKOV1,2, MINGLI ZHANG1,3* & MAYA V. NILOVA2 1 Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresource in Arid Land, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China; [email protected] 2 Department of Higher Plants, Biological Faculty, Moscow Lomonosov State University, 119234, Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 3 Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. *Corresponding author Abstract Corispermum iljinii from Qinghai and Ningxia provinces and C. nanum from Xizang (Tibet) are described as new species. The new variety C. dutreuilii var. montanum is described. Lectotypes of C. declinatum, C. elongatum and C. macrocarpum have been designated. The fruit anatomy of 16 Chinese taxa has been investigated for the first time. Both molecular and carpological data support the specific status of C. ellipsocarpum. The general fruit structure of Corispermoideae is specified and discussed. Key words: Chenopodiaceae, China, distribution, fruit anatomy, lectotypification, new taxon Introduction The genus Corispermum (Linnaeus 1753: 4) comprises at least 70 annual taxa distributed in Eurasia and North America. Central Asia appears to be one of the richest regions in Corispermum species. Twenty-seven species are recorded in temperate China (Zhu et al. 2003). All of them belong to various groups distinguished in having a perianth with 1(−2) hyaline segments. Concerning the other reproductive characters, especially in fruit morphology, the Chinese taxa highlight an high differentiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar
    The Red List of Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar Emily Beech, Malin Rivers, Sylvie Andriambololonera, Faranirina Lantoarisoa, Helene Ralimanana, Solofo Rakotoarisoa, Aro Vonjy Ramarosandratana, Megan Barstow, Katharine Davies, Ryan Hills, Kate Marfleet & Vololoniaina Jeannoda Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK. © 2020 Botanic Gardens Conservation International ISBN-10: 978-1-905164-75-2 ISBN-13: 978-1-905164-75-2 Reproduction of any part of the publication for educational, conservation and other non-profit purposes is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder, provided that the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. Recommended citation: Beech, E., Rivers, M., Andriambololonera, S., Lantoarisoa, F., Ralimanana, H., Rakotoarisoa, S., Ramarosandratana, A.V., Barstow, M., Davies, K., Hills, BOTANIC GARDENS CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL (BGCI) R., Marfleet, K. and Jeannoda, V. (2020). Red List of is the world’s largest plant conservation network, comprising more than Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar. BGCI. Richmond, UK. 500 botanic gardens in over 100 countries, and provides the secretariat to AUTHORS the IUCN/SSC Global Tree Specialist Group. BGCI was established in 1987 Sylvie Andriambololonera and and is a registered charity with offices in the UK, US, China and Kenya. Faranirina Lantoarisoa: Missouri Botanical Garden Madagascar Program Helene Ralimanana and Solofo Rakotoarisoa: Kew Madagascar Conservation Centre Aro Vonjy Ramarosandratana: University of Antananarivo (Plant Biology and Ecology Department) THE IUCN/SSC GLOBAL TREE SPECIALIST GROUP (GTSG) forms part of the Species Survival Commission’s network of over 7,000 Emily Beech, Megan Barstow, Katharine Davies, Ryan Hills, Kate Marfleet and Malin Rivers: BGCI volunteers working to stop the loss of plants, animals and their habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • ASHY DOGWEED (Thymophylla [=Dyssodia] Tephroleuca)
    ASHY DOGWEED (Thymophylla [=Dyssodia] tephroleuca) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photograph: Chris Best, USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Corpus Christi Ecological Services Field Office Corpus Christi, Texas September 2011 1 FIVE YEAR REVIEW Ashy dogweed/Thymophylla tephroleuca Blake 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Reviewers Lead Regional Office: Southwest Regional Office, Region 2 Susan Jacobsen, Chief, Threatened and Endangered Species, 505-248-6641 Wendy Brown, Endangered Species Recovery Coordinator, 505-248-6664 Julie McIntyre, Recovery Biologist, 505-248-6507 Lead Field Office: Corpus Christi Ecological Services Field Office Robyn Cobb, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 361- 994-9005, ext. 241 Amber Miller, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 361-994-9005, ext. 247 Cooperating Field Office: Austin Ecological Services Field Office Chris Best, Texas State Botanist, 512- 490-0057, ext. 225 1.2 Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species once every five years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing as endangered or threatened is based on the species’ status considering the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synopsis of the Family Chenopodiaceae in India
    Pleione 6(2): 273 - 297. 2012. ISSN: 0973-9467 © East Himalayan Society for Spermatophyte Taxonomy A synopsis of the Family Chenopodiaceae in India T. K. Paul Botanical Survey of India, Central National Herbarium, Howrah-711103, India E- mail: [email protected] Received revised 07.12.2012; Accepted 11.12.2012 Abstract The present paper presents a concise account of Chenopodiaceae in India. In all 19 genera with 50 species, 1 subspecies, 3 varieties have been recognized and another 2 genera and 14 species are cultivated or introduced. The genera and species are arranged in alphabetical order. Within the enumeration Key to genera and species, correct nomenclature, reference to type materials wherever available, phenology and distribution also have been added. Key words: India, Chenopodiaceae, Synopsis, comb. et stat. nov. INTRODUCTION The plants of Chenopodiaceae Ventenat, commonly known as ‘Goosefoot’ family, are mostly grow as weed and some are food plants like spinach, chard, beets, sugar beet and quinoa. The family is placed in the order Caryophyllales by Cronquist (1981), Takhtajan (1969) and Dahlgren (1975). Hutchinson (1959) and Thorne (1968, 1992) included the family in the order Chenopodiales, Ulbrich in Engler & Prantl (1934) in the order Centrospermae and Bentham & Hooker (1880) in the series Curvembryeae. Bentham & Hooker (1880) divided the family into two series, cyclobeae and spirolobeae. Cyclobeae is characterized by annular embryo, albumen copious whereas in spirolobeae the embryo is spiral and albumen scanty or absent. Williams & Ford-Lloyd (1974) recognised three subfamilies: Chenopodieae (embryo cyclical, operculum absent, endosperm absent, ovary superior), Salsoleae (embryo spiral, operculum absent, endosperm absent, ovary superior), Beteae (embryo cyclical, operculum present in fruit, endosperm present, ovary semi-inferior).
    [Show full text]
  • Nectaries, Nectar and Flower Visitors in Nyctaginaceae from Southern South
    bs_bs_banner Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 171, 551–567. With 4 figures Four o’clock pollination biology: nectaries, nectar and flower visitors in Nyctaginaceae from southern South America MARÍA J. NORES1*†, HERNÁN A. LÓPEZ1†, PAULA J. RUDALL2, ANA M. ANTON1 and LEONARDO GALETTO1 1Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, CONICET – Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Casilla de Correo 495, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina 2Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK Received 23 February 2012; revised 23 September 2012; accepted for publication 12 November 2012 Floral nectary structure and nectar sugar composition were investigated in relation to other floral traits and flower visitors in contrasting species of Nyctaginaceae from southern South America, representing four tribes (Bougain- villeeae, Colignonieae, Nyctagineae, Pisoneae). Our comparative data will aid in the understanding of plant– pollinator interactions and in the development of hypotheses on the origin of floral and reproductive characters in this family. The nectaries are located on the inner side of the staminal tube. The nectariferous tissue is composed of an epidermis and three to ten layers of secretory parenchymal cells, supplied indirectly by the filament vascular bundles. Stomata appear to be associated with nectar secretion. For the first time in Nyctaginaceae, nectary ultrastructure is described in Boerhavia diffusa var. leiocarpa. Nectary parenchyma cells are densely cytoplasmic and contain numerous starch grains. Plasmodesmata connect the nectariferous cells. Flowers of Nyctaginaceae secrete a small volume of nectar of variable concentration (10–47%). Nectar is dominated by hexoses, but Mirabilis jalapa showed a balanced proportion of sucrose and hexoses. Hymenoptera are the most common visitors for most species; nocturnal Lepidoptera are the most common visitors for M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae Linda M
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 24 | Issue 1 Article 8 2007 A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae Linda M. Prince Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Prince, Linda M. (2007) "A Brief Nomenclatural Review of Genera and Tribes in Theaceae," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 24: Iss. 1, Article 8. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol24/iss1/8 Aliso 24, pp. 105–121 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden A BRIEF NOMENCLATURAL REVIEW OF GENERA AND TRIBES IN THEACEAE LINDA M. PRINCE Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Ave., Claremont, California 91711-3157, USA ([email protected]) ABSTRACT The angiosperm family Theaceae has been investigated extensively with a rich publication record of anatomical, cytological, paleontological, and palynological data analyses and interpretation. Recent developmental and molecular data sets and the application of cladistic analytical methods support dramatic changes in circumscription at the familial, tribal, and generic levels. Growing interest in the family outside the taxonomic and systematic fields warrants a brief review of the recent nomenclatural history (mainly 20th century), some of the classification systems currently in use, and an explanation of which data support various classification schemes. An abridged bibliography with critical nomen- clatural references is provided. Key words: anatomy, classification, morphology, nomenclature, systematics, Theaceae. INTRODUCTION acters that were restricted to the family and could be used to circumscribe it.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Angiosperm Pollen. 5. Early Diverging Superasteridae
    Evolution of Angiosperm Pollen. 5. Early Diverging Superasteridae (Berberidopsidales, Caryophyllales, Cornales, Ericales, and Santalales) Plus Dilleniales Author(s): Ying Yu, Alexandra H. Wortley, Lu Lu, De-Zhu Li, Hong Wang and Stephen Blackmore Source: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 103(1):106-161. Published By: Missouri Botanical Garden https://doi.org/10.3417/2017017 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3417/2017017 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/ page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. EVOLUTION OF ANGIOSPERM Ying Yu,2 Alexandra H. Wortley,3 Lu Lu,2,4 POLLEN. 5. EARLY DIVERGING De-Zhu Li,2,4* Hong Wang,2,4* and SUPERASTERIDAE Stephen Blackmore3 (BERBERIDOPSIDALES, CARYOPHYLLALES, CORNALES, ERICALES, AND SANTALALES) PLUS DILLENIALES1 ABSTRACT This study, the fifth in a series investigating palynological characters in angiosperms, aims to explore the distribution of states for 19 pollen characters on five early diverging orders of Superasteridae (Berberidopsidales, Caryophyllales, Cornales, Ericales, and Santalales) plus Dilleniales.
    [Show full text]