Ground Covers for Arizona Landscapes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SALT TOLERANT PLANTS Recommended for Pender County Landscapes
North Carolina Cooperative Extension NC STATE UNIVERSITY SALT TOLERANT PLANTS Recommended for Pender County Landscapes Pender County Cooperative Extension Urban Horticulture Leaflet 14 Coastal Challenges Plants growing at the beach are subjected to environmental conditions much different than those planted further inland. Factors such as blowing sand, poor soils, high temperatures, and excessive drainage all influence how well plants perform in coastal landscapes, though the most significant effect on growth is salt spray. Most plants will not tolerate salt accumulating on their foliage, making plant selection for beachfront land- scapes particularly challenging. Salt Spray Salt spray is created when waves break on the beach, throwing tiny droplets of salty water into the air. On-shore breezes blow this salt laden air landward where it comes in contact with plant foliage. The amount of salt spray plants receive varies depending on their proximity to the beachfront, creating different vegetation zones as one gets further away from the beachfront. The most salt-tolerant species surviving in the frontal dune area. As distance away from the ocean increases, the level of salt spray decreases, allowing plants with less salt tolerance to survive. Natural Protection The impact of salt spray on plants can be lessened by physically blocking salt laden winds. This occurs naturally in the maritime forest, where beachfront plants protect landward species by creating a layer of foliage that blocks salt spray. It is easy to see this effect on the ocean side of maritime forest plants, which are “sheared” by salt spray, causing them to grow at a slant away from the oceanfront. -
Asiatic Jasmine Trachelospermum Asiaticum
Asiatic Jasmine Trachelospermum asiaticum The small, dark green glossy leaves of dwarf jasmine have prominent veins of a lighter green. The slender, wiry stems simply sprawl on the ground, providing a dense groundcover within two years after planting in full sun, slower in shade. The small, pale yellow, star-shaped, very fragrantblooms are rare in Florida. General Information Pronunciation: tray-kell-loe-SPER-mum ay-shee-AT-tickkum Common name(s): Dwarf Jasmine, Small-Leaf Confederate Jasmine, Asiatic Jasmine Family: Apocynaceae Plant type: vine USDA hardiness zones: 7B through 10 Planting month for zone 9: year round Origin: not native to North America Uses: cascading down a wall Availability: generally available in many areas within its hardiness range Description Height: depends upon supporting structure Spread: depends upon supporting structure Plant habit: spreading Plant density: dense Growth rate: fast Texture: fine Foliage Leaf arrangement: opposite/subopposite Leaf type: simple Trunk and Branches Leaf margin: entire Leaf shape: ovate Leaf venation: pinnate Leaf type and persistence: evergreen Leaf blade length: less than 2 inches Leaf color: variegated Fall color: no fall color change Fall characteristic: not showy Flower Flower color: yellow Flower characteristic: inconspicuous and not showy; pleasant fragrance Fruit Fruit shape: pod or pod-like Fruit length: 1 to 3 inches Fruit cover: dry or hard Fruit color: unknown Fruit characteristic: inconspicuous and not showy Trunk/bark/branches: not applicable Current year stem/twig -
Field Release of the Leaf-Feeding Moth, Hypena Opulenta (Christoph)
United States Department of Field release of the leaf-feeding Agriculture moth, Hypena opulenta Marketing and Regulatory (Christoph) (Lepidoptera: Programs Noctuidae), for classical Animal and Plant Health Inspection biological control of swallow- Service worts, Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench and V. rossicum (Kleopow) Barbarich (Gentianales: Apocynaceae), in the contiguous United States. Final Environmental Assessment, August 2017 Field release of the leaf-feeding moth, Hypena opulenta (Christoph) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), for classical biological control of swallow-worts, Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench and V. rossicum (Kleopow) Barbarich (Gentianales: Apocynaceae), in the contiguous United States. Final Environmental Assessment, August 2017 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. -
Sunbow Ii, Phase 3 Project Fire Protection Plan
Appendix H3 Fire Protection Plan SUNBOW II, PHASE 3 PROJECT FIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared for: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 16465 Via Esprillo, Suite 150 San Diego, California 92127 Contact: David Shepherd Project Applicant ACI Sunbow, LLC 2356 Moore Street San Diego, California 92110 Contact: Bill Hamlin Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 MARCH 2021 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Table of Contents SECTION PAGE NO. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. VII 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Applicable Codes and Existing Regulations .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Proposed Project Summary ................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Location ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Proposed Project Description ................................................................................................... 2 2 PROPOSED PROJECT SITE RISK ANALYSIS................................................................................................... -
FINAL Programmatic Environmental Assessment Wildfire Hazard Mitigation Projects in the State of Montana
FINAL Programmatic Environmental Assessment Wildfire Hazard Mitigation Projects in the State of Montana September 2019 Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VIII Department of Homeland Security Denver Federal Center Building 710, Box 25267 Denver, CO 80225-0267 This document was prepared by Contract No.: HSFE60‐15‐D‐0015 Task Order: HSFE60‐17-J-0026 Cover Photo Credit: Nicky Ouellet, Montana Public Radio Table of Contents SECTION 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Wildfire Hazard Mitigation .......................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Area of Study ................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 Process for the Use of This PEA .................................................................................. 1-4 SECTION 2. Purpose and Need .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Project Purpose ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Project Need .................................................................................................................. 2-1 SECTION 3. Alternatives ........................................................................................................ -
Plants for Sun & Shade
Plants for Dry Shade Blue Shade Ruellia Ruellia tweediana Bugleweed Ajuga Cast Iron Plant Aspidistra Cedar Sage Salvia roemeriana Columbine Aquilegia Coral Bells Heuchera Flax Lily Dianella tasmanica ‘variegata’ Frog Fruit Phyla nodiflora Heartleaf Skullcap Scutellaria ovata ssp. Bracteata Japanese Aralia Fatsia japonica Katie Ruellia Ruellia tweediana Majestic Sage Salvia guaranitica Red Skullcap Scuttelaria longifolia Tropical or Scarlet Sage Salvia coccinea Turk’s Cap Malvaviscus arboreus var. drummondii Virginia Creeper Parthenocissus quinquefolia Plants for Moist Shade Australian Violet Viola hederacea Carex grass Sedge spp. Cardinal Flower Lobelia cardinalis Chinese Ground Orchid Bletilla striata Creeping Daisy Wedelia trilobata Creeping Jenny Lysimachia nummularia Crinum lily Crinum spp. False Spirea Astilbe spp. Fall Obedient Plant Physostegia virginiana Firespike Odontenema strictum Ferns various botanical names Gingers various botanical names Gulf Coast Penstemon Penstemon tenuis Inland Sea Oats Chasmanthium latifolium Ligularia Ligularia spp. Spikemoss Selaginella kraussiana Toadlily Tricyrtis spp. Turk’s Cap Malvaviscus arboreus var. drummondii Tropical or Scarlet Sage Salvia coccinea Water Celery Oenanthe javanica This and other plant care tip sheets are available at Buchanansplants.com. 01/15/16 Plants for Dry Sun Artemisia Artemisia spp. BiColor Iris Dietes bicolor Black-eyed Susan Rudbeckia spp. Blackfoot Daisy Melampodium leucanthum Blanket Flower Gaillardia spp. Bougainvillea Bougainville Bulbine Bulbine frutescens Butterfly Iris Dietes iridioides (Morea) Copper Canyon Daisy Tagetes lemmonii Coral Vine Antigonon leptopus Crossvine Bignonia capreolata Coreopsis Coreopsis spp. Dianella Dianella spp. Four Nerve Daisy Tetraneuris scaposa (Hymenoxys) Gulf Coast Muhly Muhlenbergia capillaris Ice Plant Drosanthemum sp. Mexican Hat Ratibida columnaris Plumbago Plumbago auriculata Rock Rose Pavonia spp. Sedum Sedum spp. Salvias Salvia spp. -
Ground Covers for Georgia Landscapes
Ground Covers for Georgia Landscapes Gary L. Wade, Extension Horticulturist Center: Japanese Spurge. Outside: Dwarf Mondograss Junipers planted on a bank. round covers are spreading, low-growing plants Ground covers are also valued for aesthetic reasons. used in landscapes to cover an area of ground. They soften harsh architectural lines of buildings and TheyG may be woody plants, like junipers, or herba- paved areas. When skillfully interplanted with trees ceous perennial plants, like sedum or daylilies. Gener- and shrubs, ground covers impart a textural balance ally, ground cover plants are evergreen and spread by and unity to the landscape by bridging the gaps be- horizontal stems, stolons (above-ground stems that tween trees and shrubs. root along their nodes) or rhizomes (below-ground creeping stems that spread outward). For the purposes Selecting Ground Covers of this publication, plants that spread by seed or are One of the first considerations when selecting a taller than 3 feet in height are not considered ground ground cover is whether it is cold hardy for the area in covers. which it is to be grown. Georgia has five cold-hardi- ness zones, according the 1990 USDA cold-hardiness Ground covers have many practical uses. Some can zone map. The zones are based on the average mini- be used to control erosion when planted on slopes or mum temperatures of each region of the state. banks. Others are effective lawn substitutes in areas that are too shady to support the growth of grasses or areas that are difficult to mow. Densely growing ground covers also effectively control weeds by block- ing light from reaching the ground. -
Range Condition Influences on Chihuahuan Desert Cattle and Jackrabbit Diets
J. Range Manage. 46:296-301, July 1993 Range condition influences on Chihuahuan Desert cattle and jackrabbit diets ALIPAYOU DANIEL, JERRY L. HOLECHEK, RAUL VALDEZ, ACKIM TEMBO, LEWIS SAIWANA, MICHAEL RUSCO, AND MANUAL CARDENAS Authors are graduate research assistant (deceased) andprofessor, Dept. of Animal and Range Sciences; professor, Dept. of Fishery and Wildlife Sciences; graduate research assistant, graduate research assistant, andgraduate research assistant, Dept. of Animal and Range Sciences; and professor, Dept. of Exp. Sta. New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, 88003. Abstract Knowledge of comparative diet selection by cattle and black- desert rangeland. The objective of this study was to determine the tailed jackrabbits (Lepus californicus) would permit better estima- influence of range condition on jackrabbit and cattle diets on tion of grazing capacity on Chibuabunn desert ranges. Cattle and Chihuahuan desert rangelands. Diet composition of both species black-tailed jackrabbit diets were evaluated seasonally on good was quantified with microhistological analysis of fecal material. and fair condition ranges over a Z-year period. Fecal samples Material and Methods analyzed by the microhistological technique were used to deter- mine diets of both animals. Key forage species in cattle diets were The 2 study ranges are located 37 km north of Las Cruces, N.M. dropseeds (Sporobolus sp.), black grama (Bouteloua eriopoda Their western boundaries are adjacent to Interstate 25. The study Torr.), leatherweed croton (CrotonpottsiiLam.), and bush muhly area is on the southern end of the Jornada Del Muerto Plain, a (Muhlenbergiaporteri Scribn.). Key forage species in jackrabbit desert basin which varies from 1,188 to I,37 1 m elevation with level diets were honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr.), cactus or gently rolling hills. -
OSU Gardening with Oregon Native Plants
GARDENING WITH OREGON NATIVE PLANTS WEST OF THE CASCADES EC 1577 • Reprinted March 2008 CONTENTS Benefi ts of growing native plants .......................................................................................................................1 Plant selection ....................................................................................................................................................2 Establishment and care ......................................................................................................................................3 Plant combinations ............................................................................................................................................5 Resources ............................................................................................................................................................5 Recommended native plants for home gardens in western Oregon .................................................................8 Trees ...........................................................................................................................................................9 Shrubs ......................................................................................................................................................12 Groundcovers ...........................................................................................................................................19 Herbaceous perennials and ferns ............................................................................................................21 -
Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae
SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII. -
Literature Cited
Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes. -
Groundcovers Vs. Lawns
Groundcovers vs. Lawns By Valerie Jean Rose June 3, 2011 Goodbye lawn? Groundcovers: The Lawn You Don’t Have to Mow Groundcovers are a creative alternative to problematic grass lawns, or areas that are hazardous to maintain. Have you ever seen people doing daredevil stunts while mowing a steep hillside? I’ve seen folks holding onto a bush with one hand while guiding the mower with the other, even using a rope tied around the handle to pull it up and down a hillside. These are not safe practices, don’t try this at home! Consider planting groundcovers, and say goodbye to (at least some of) your mowing chores. Some groundcovers grow horizontally, creating a solid mass. They spread by rhizomes (horizontal underground stems which can send out shoots and roots) or above ground by stolons (stems that grow roots when they touch the ground.) Established groundcovers can crowd out weeds and retain moisture in sunny areas. Many groundcovers are drought tolerant, but must be watered the first few years until they become established. One advantage of a turf lawn is how good it feels beneath bare feet. Some groundcovers do tolerate foot traffic –ask for them at you favorite Skagit County nursery. A few short groundcovers (i.e. wooly thyme or creeping thyme) grow beautifully between pavers in sunny areas. Though they are technically not true mosses, Scotch moss and Irish moss can also be walked upon. They need at least partial sun to grow into a thick mat and less water than a “true” moss, which dries up in summer.