DOCSLIB.ORG

Shabbat-B'shabbato – Parshat Korach No 1579: 3 Tammuz 5775 (20 June 2015)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shabbat-B'shabbato – Parshat Korach No 1579: 3 Tammuz 5775 (20 June 2015) Shabbat-B'Shabbato – Parshat Korach No 1579: 3 Tammuz 5775 (20 June 2015) AS SHABBAT APPROACHES Is it Good to Have a King or Not? - by Rabbi Oury Cherki, Machon Meir, Rabbi of Beit Yehuda Congregation, Jerusalem In the Haftorah for this week, Shmuel tries to strengthen the status of the King. "And Shmuel said to the people, Let us go to Gilgal, where we will renew the kingdom." [Shmuel I 11:14]. It seems that Shmuel has resigned himself to accept the will of the nation to appoint a king as their head, in spite of his objections when the people first turned to him (ibid, 8:6). It is therefore surprising to see that Shmuel still rebukes the people at this point, even at an event where he seems to support Shaul and gives him the title, "anointed by G-d" [12:3]. The rebuke, which is accompanied by a sign of thunder and rain in the season of the harvest, leads the people to cry out, "we have added on to our sins, by asking for a king for ourselves" [12:19]. Evidently Shmuel's intention is to create the proper awareness with respect to the government institutions. Anybody who prays for the appearance of the Kingdom of G-d has doubts about any other government authority. The Rebbe of Satmar, Rabbi Yoel Teitelbaum, expressed this doubt very well when he said that to establish any government, even a religious one, before the coming of the Mashiach, would be a revolt against the Kingdom of Heaven. While it is true that his words are not halachically valid with respect to the government of the State of Israel for the simple reason that we were commanded in the Torah to establish this government (see Ramban, commenting on the Sefer Hamitzvot, positive mitzva 4), such that in this case it is a mitzva and not a sin, there is a grain of truth in his approach – we must make sure that the government will not block the way to the Kingdom of Heaven but rather that it will be a reflection of this kingdom. The events as they took place clarify the essence of the role of the prophet who accompanies a king - and this is to pray. "And the entire nation said to Shmuel, Pray for your slaves to your G-d, so that we will not die" [12:19]. The people do not see prayer as a request or as an expression of religious fervor, but as the exclusive prerogative of the prophet. Since he is the one who is familiar with G-d, it is his obligation to turn to Him, and then the prayer will be answered. As opposed to classic religious training, where the teacher tries to encourage his pupils to join in the prayers, Shmuel understands that since he is the prophet it is his job to pray. This position feeds the link to G-d for a society whose political situation blocks any direct Divine contact. While the prophet does not fulfill the role of the King, it is his merit that allows the kingdom to exist. The presence of the prophets in the house of the King provides an element of criticism which keeps the path of the King in balance. Even at a time when there was no longer any prophecy in Yisrael, and even when the authoritative establishment was limited to the size of a community "vaad" – a local administrative committee – the halacha insists that it is necessary to have the agreement of an "important man" in order for the rules established by the community to have authority. Moral authority is what gives the political establishment a soul. Rabbi Cherki is the head of Brit Olam – Noahide World Center, Jerusalem *** A new book by Rabbi Cherki: "A Clear Viewpoint: The World and Man in the Teachings of Rav Kook" (in Hebrew). To order, phone: 050-5556775, or send mail to [email protected]. POINT OF VIEW One Boycott Deserves Another - by Rabbi Yisrael Rozen, Dean of the Zomet Institute "Every property that is banned will belong to you" [Bamidbar 18:14]. 1 The Boycott is on You, Yisrael! We have just experienced a threat of an economic boycott of Israel by the French company "Orange" (with its trademark of an "orange square"). As far as I can see this affair is over, it rose overnight and dissipated within a week, as a result of a threat of a counter-boycott based on international Jewish solidarity. Similarly, the threat of forcing Israel out of FIFA, the international soccer organization, has also been suppressed or at least delayed for the time being. The threat of academic boycotts is still floating around in universities and international conferences, but it seems that the publicity is much greater than the actual effect, and that they are not very important for the time being. There is also the matter of leading performers who refuse to appear in Israel (thank heaven...) in response to propaganda by anti-Israeli organizations, with support of the radical- traitorous left in Israel. These organizations have banded together in their anti-Israel activities under the BDS banner – boycott, divestment, sanctions. Not everybody is aware that Israel surrendered to the European Union and now marks all the produce that comes from the settlements, which no longer has the same benefits as agricultural produce from the "original" Israel. About six months ago we were given the "news" that the Ministry of Agriculture sent to Europe a list of producers of milk from the Golan Heights and from the Jordan Valley (what does the new Minister of Agriculture, Uri Ariel have to say about this?). I assume that this is also linked to some activity by leftists in Israel. And let us not forget the infamy of the newspaper Haaretz, which published in the past lists of companies in Yehuda, the Shomron, and the Golan, with a call to boycott them. Mending a Faulty Law In order to fight such traitorous Israelis, a Boycott Law (2011) was passed in Israel, which prohibits calling for or actions "leading to instituting an economic, cultural, or academic boycott on Israel, on an institution of Israel, or on an area under its control." This law was promoted by the rightist side of the political spectrum, but the Knesset and the Supreme Court have joined forces to greatly water it down (could it be otherwise?). In the Knesset, it was made into a law that entails civil damages only and which does not include criminal action. The Supreme Court gave the law its (almost) final blow by striking down the clause that allows compensation without a need for proof of the amount of damage caused (such a clause exists, for example, in the laws against libel). Every child can understand that such a ruling is not purely legal but shows a desire to negate the nationalistic atmosphere of the law, since as we all know the Supreme Court, which we are discussing, represents nothing so much as the United Nations... I can safely assume that nobody has ever been sued under the provisions of this law, and I predict that it will not happen – unless the law is amended to allow public institutions to accuse others based on the law and to bring class action suits, and unless the clause not requiring the damage to be specified is returned to the law. And here is a worthy challenge for the new and energetic Minister of Justice, Ayelet Shaked, who recently spoke out against such boycotts as "a new brand of anti-Semitism." Such an amended law, if it has teeth in it, can act as a response to Israelites, spiritual heirs of Datan and Aviram, the ideological informers of the time of Moshe, who showed the way for apostates and informers throughout the exiles, up to the collaborators of today who sell their souls to the enemy. Back to "The Elders of Zion" However, what can we do about the other nations of the world, who want to boycott and ban us? The reply in economic and commercial terms is what we saw in the "Orange" affair. Institute one boycott in return for another, with support from the forces of the Jewish nation in the Diaspora. Remember how the Nazi anti-Semites distributed a counterfeit document, "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," which claimed that the Jews plan to take over the world, using the power of their money and their solidarity contacts. I 2 suggest that we "freshen" these "protocols" and make use of the power of the Jews, both financially and politically, to mount a boycott in reaction. This is not the first time that I have called out to strike out against the enemy by turning his own weapons against him. As in other realms, here too what is needed is cooperation at a government level, either open or covert (or even denied), together with representatives of new Jewish organizations, both antagonistic and polite at the same time. We must draft the wealthy people of the Jews ("the elders of Zion") to fight boycotts with counter-boycotts, and we can hope for Divine support. And this is a worthy challenge for the new and energetic Deputy Foreign Minister, Miri Regev, who is a seasoned warrior against those who would boycott us. The same approach should be taken in the realm of legal action, without reference to economics: We must bring nuisance suits in the international court of justice in the Hague, in sports organizations, in academic halls, and in the realms of culture, art, and entertainment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parashat Korach 5773 June 8, 2013
    Parashat Korach 5773 June 8, 2013 This week’s Dvar Tzedek takes the form of an interactive text study. We hope that you’ll use this text study to actively engage with the parashah and contemporary global justice issues. Consider using this text study in any of the following ways: • Learn collectively. Discuss it with friends, family or colleagues. Discuss it at your Shabbat table. • Enrich your own learning. Read it as you would a regular Dvar Tzedek and reflect on the questions it raises. • Teach. Use the ideas and reactions it sparks in you as the basis for your own dvar Torah. Please take two minutes to share your thoughts on this piece by completing this feedback form . Introduction Parashat Korach opens with a scene of intense political drama in which a coalition of disgruntled Israelites challenges Moses and Aaron’s leadership. An analysis of this rebellion and the motivations of its leaders provides an opportunity to explore questions of politics, power and leadership—our associations with them, why they are important and how we might be able to utilize them to achieve the justice that we seek for our communities and the world. The Torah describes the opening of the showdown between Korach’s coalition and Moses and Aaron, as follows: במדבר טז:א ד, ח יא Numbers 16:1 ---4, 8 ---111111 ַוִ ַ ח ֹקַרח, ֶ ִיְצָהר ֶ ְקָהת ֶ ֵלִוי; ְוָדָת Now Korach, son of Izhar son of Kohat son of Levi, took, along ַוֲאִביָר ְֵני ֱאִליב, ְואֹו ֶ !ֶ לֶת ְ נֵי —with Datan and Abiram sons of Eliab, and On son of Pelet ְרא%ֵב.
    [Show full text]
  • Parshat Korach 5770 by Guy Izhak Austrian June 12, 2010
    Parshat Korach 5770 By Guy Izhak Austrian June 12, 2010 “We will keep the victims and their families in our prayers.” So said President Barack Obama after the devastating earthquake in Haiti last January, before concluding with just such a prayer: “May God bless the people of Haiti and those working on their behalf.”1 At the same time, the Rabbinical Assembly of Conservative Judaism distributed a “Prayer for Haiti” by Rabbi Naomi Levy,2 and no doubt, many other Americans prayed as well. Given all of the options for taking action after a crisis in a developing country—donating, organizing and volunteering—why do the President, a rabbi in Los Angeles and ordinary people across the U.S. feel compelled to pray for the victims? What impact can these prayers have? We can find a clue in the haftarah for Parshat Korach, a passage from the First Book of Samuel.3 There, Samuel bids farewell to the Israelites, and he rebukes the people for insisting on being ruled by a king. Yet Samuel promises that though he is no longer their prophet and judge, he will continue to pray for them: “Moreover as for me, far be it from me that I should sin against the Lord in ceasing to pray for you.”4 Samuel juxtaposes his own prayerful support of the people with his prophecy, in an earlier passage, of the king’s coming oppression. The king, he says, “yikach”—will take—your children, vineyards and olive groves, your servants and livestock.5 In contrast, Samuel asks rhetorically, “Whose ox have I taken … from whom have I taken a bribe…?” and the people affirm, “You have not taken anything from anyone.”6 Samuel suggests that a righteous leader prays for the people, while an exploitative leader such as a king will only take.
    [Show full text]
  • Parshat Korach Weekly Dvar Torah for the Sake of Heaven
    Parshat Korach 3 Tammuz 5778 /June 16, 2018 Daf Yomi: Zevachim 64; Nach Yomi: Isaiah 24 Weekly Dvar Torah A project of the NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL SPONSORED BY THE HENRY, BERTHA AND EDWARD ROTHMAN FOUNDATION ROCHESTER, NY,CLEVELAND, OHIO, CIRCLEVILLE, OHIO For the Sake of Heaven Rabbi Naphtali Burnstein Mara D'atra, Young Israel of Greater Cleveland In Pirkei Avot, Chapter 5, Mishna 20, we are reminded of the difference between a machlokes sh’le L’Shem Shamayim ─ “a dispute that is for the sake of Heaven, and a machlokes sh’eino L’Shem Shamayim ─ a dispute not for the sale of Heaven.” In giving us the examples of each, the Mishna chooses that of Hillel and Shammai as that of a machlokes sh’le L’Shem Shamayim, and that of Korach and his entire community as that of a machlokes sh’eino L’Shem Shamayim. The question is asked why the two examples given in the Mishna do not seem to be comparablel. In the first example, Hillel and Shammai are the ones chosen as having disputes for the sake of heaven, and in the latter example, rather than choosing Korach together with Moshe and Aharon, Korach and his community are chosen. Did Korach indeed dispute with his followers or with Moshe and Aharon? Many suggestions have been offered; perhaps the most well-known approach is the following: The Mishna, mentioned above, points out that a machlokes L’Shem Shamayim will have a constructive outcome, whereas a machlokes sh’einoL’Shem Shamayim will not. The reasoning for this striking difference is in the motivation behind each.
    [Show full text]
  • Shlach – the Few That Are Many Simon Wolf Respect to the Antecedent
    בס"ד פרשת שלח Parshat Shlach – The Few that are Many Simon Wolf respect to the antecedent. In order to gain a better understanding of this phenomenon, it is worthwhile The Mishna in Megillah records a series of religious to take a deeper look at a couple of examples. The practices that require ten men (Minyan) to be most prominent illustration of this vagueness is the performed.1 Included in the list are reading the Pasuk that we quoted above found in Parshat Torah, Birkat Kohanim, Kaddish, Kedusha, Barchu, Korach. items that are otherwise known as Devarim במדבר פרק טז or expressions of (דברים שבקדושה) Sh’b’Kedusha (כ) וַיְ ַד ֵּ֣בר יְקֹ֔וָק ֶאל־מ ֹ ֶׁ֥שה וְ ֶ ֽא ֲל־ַאה ֖ר ֹן ֵל ֽאמ ֹר: sanctity.2 The Gemara then queries as to the (כא) ִה ָּ֣ב ְד ֔לּו ִמ ּ֖תֹוְך ָה ֵע ָ ֣דה ַה ּ֑ז ֹאת וַ ֲא ַכ ֶּ֥לה א ֹ ָ֖תם ְּכ ָ ֽר ַגע: source of the Mishna’s contention that ten men are (כב) וַּיִ ְּפ ֤לּו ַע ְל־ּפנֵ ֶיה ֙ם וַּ֣י ֹ ְאמ ֔רּו ֕ ֵאל ֱא ֵֹ֥להי ָה ֖רּוח ֹת ְל ָכ ָל־ּב ָׂ֑שר essential for creating a Minyan. In response, Rabbi ָה ִ֤איׁש ֶא ָח ֙ד יֶ ֱח ֔ ָטא וְ ַ֥על ָּכל ָ־ה ֵע ָ ֖דה ִּת ְק ֽצ ֹף: פ Yochanan references to the verse in Parshat Emor,3 (כג) וַיְ ַד ֵּ֥בר יְק ָֹ֖וק ֶאל־מ ֹ ֶׁ֥שה ֵּל ֽאמ ֹר: and I will be sanctified amongst Bnei Yisrael“ (כד) ַּד ֵּ֥בר ֶאל־ ָה ֵע ָ ֖דה ֵל ֑אמ ֹר ֵ ֽה ָע ֙לּו ִמ ָּס ֔ ִביב ְל ִמ ְׁש ַּכ ֖ן־ק ֹ ַרח ָּד ָ֥תן which he claims asserts ”(ונקדשתי בתוך בני ישראל) וַ ֲא ִב ָ ֽירם: that “any expression of holiness should not be recited in a quorum of fewer than ten.” Perplexed by the response, the Gemara inquires as to from where At the climax of Korach’s rebellion, God commands in the verse can this be inferred.
    [Show full text]
  • Parshat Shelach Weekly Dvar Torah
    Parshat Shelach 26 Sivan 5779 /June 29, 2019 Daf Yomi: Erchin 13; Nach Yomi: Mishlei 19 Mevorchim HaChodesh Tammuz Weekly Dvar Torah A project of the NATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL SPONSORED BY THE HENRY, BERTHA AND EDWARD ROTHMAN FOUNDATION ROCHESTER, NY,CLEVELAND, OHIO, CIRCLEVILLE, OHIO Fleeing from Fame Brings Respite from Reproach Rabbi Dovid Sochet Associate Member, Young Israel Council of Rabbis This week's parsha relates the mission of the twelve meraglim - spies or scouts - who were sent to scout the land of Cana'an before the Jewish nation entered it. When they returned from their reconnaissance, ten of the meraglim reported that the people would not be able to conquer the land. Only two of those sent - Yehoshua and Caleiv - insisted that Israel would prevail against the Cananites. How were those two able to withstand the pressure of the other meraglim and act independently? Rashi cites a medrash which says that when “Moshe called Hoshea bin Nun, Yehoshua" (Bamidbar 13:16) he was praying that Yehoshua should not be influenced by the evil plans of the other meraglim. The name change implies (as Rashi notes) this prayer. “May Hashem (Yud-Hay) save you from the plot of the Spies." The Targum Yonasan (See Tractate Megillah 3A where the Gemarah attributes its authorship to Reb Yonasan ben Uziel. Its overall style is very similar to that of Targum Onkelos, though at times it seems to be a looser paraphrase.) adds: "When Moshe saw his extreme humility, he called Hoshea bin Nun, Yehoshua." Caleiv, however, managed, on his own, that is without Moshe interceding on his behalf, to withstand the mergalim's scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tribe Weekly Newsletter This Week's Parasha Is Eikev
    The Tribe Weekly Newsletter This Week’s Parasha is Eikev Shabbat Times in London Shabbat begins: 8.24pm Shabbat ends: 9.31pm In this week’s Parasha (Weekly Torah portion), Eikev, Moshe (Moses) continued to address the Children of Israel, assuring them that if they follow the Mitzvot (Commandments) of the Torah, they would have no need to fear the Canaanites and they would conquer and settle in the Land, with God as their protector. Moshe (Moses) described the richness of the Land of Israel, including the seven varieties of fruit/grain (Shivat Haminim); wheat, barley, grapes, figs, pomegranates, olives and dates). Moshe (Moses) then reminded the people of their acts of rebellion during their forty years in the Wilderness. He reminded them how they had worshipped the Golden Calf when they thought Moshe (Moses) would not return from the top of the mountain. Moshe (Moses) also reminded them of the rebellion of Korach, the sin of the spies and when they made God angry at different places, namely; Taveirah, Massah, Kivrot Hataavah and Kadesh Barneah. But Moshe (Moses) also reminded the Children of Israel that God forgave them and gave them another chance with the second set of Luchot (Tablets of stone). Moshe (Moses) told the Children of Israel that all the great events they had witnessed during their forty years in the Wilderness (the deliverance from Egypt, the splitting of the Red Sea, the miraculous punishment given to Korach and his rebellion, the Manna and the miraculous source of water), would ensure their observance of and commitment to all of God’s laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Candc-Family
    בקע עשת " ט Eikev 5779 The Politics of Memory WELCOME TO COVENANT & CONVERSATION 5779 FAMILY EDITION Covenant & Conversation: Family Edition is a new and exciting initiative from The Office of Rabbi Sacks for 5779. Written as an accompaniment to Rabbi Sacks’ weekly Covenant & Conversation essay, the Family Edition is aimed at connecting teenagers and families with his ideas and thoughts on the parsha. To receive this via email please make sure you are subscribed to Rabbi Sacks’ main mailing list at www.RabbiSacks.org/Subscribe. PARSHAT EIKEV IN A NUTSHELL In Eikev Moses continues his speech, setting out the Moses reminds them of the people’s sins during the principles of the covenant the Israelites made with God, and wilderness years, the Golden Calf, the Korach rebellion, and what it demands of them as a chosen nation in a Promised other similar stories. He reminds them, too, of God’s Land. If they are faithful to the covenant, they will be forgiveness. Remembering their history, they must love and blessed, both materially and spiritually. But they should not respect God and teach their children to do the same. This attribute their success solely to themselves or their entire set of beliefs is summarised in the passage that righteousness. They must never forget that God is helping became the second paragraph of the Shema (Devarim with every step along the way. 11:13–21). Israel’s fate depends on Israel’s faith. THE CORE IDEA This week Moses continues to speak to the people, setting and all you have is multiplied, then your heart will become out an ideology that holds such wisdom that it will remain proud and you will forget the Lord your God who brought you relevant for all of their lives and for every generation that out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery… You may say to follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Keshet Pride Shabbat Sermon Guide
    Keshet Pride Shabbat Sermon Guide Developed for Keshet by Leora Spitzer The goal of this guide is to provide some suggestions, themes, and resources for clergy planning to give a sermon about or related to Pride Month. “Queer joy is revolutionary. Protect every spark and feed it until it catches and ignites. Having a moment of delight or pleasure doesn’t make your fury less real, it makes it more sustainable.” ~S. Bear Bergman • Questions and Themes by Parsha / Weekly Torah Portion: o Shlach L’kha. In this portion, the spies report that “we looked like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and so we must have seemed to them.” How can we avoid making anyone feel like “grasshoppers?” How do we ensure that everyone in our communities feels seen and valued? (Num:13:3) We repeat Numbers 14:18 and 14:20 over and over throughout the Yom Kippur liturgy. How can we think about this model of accountability, forgiveness, and relationship in the context of reckoning with institutional homophobia, transphobia, and queerphobia? o Korach Korach frames his rebellion as an act of solidarity and allyship with regular Israelites, but many commentators understand it as motivated by his own personal desire for power. What can we learn from this story about how to be a good ally and truly stand in solidarity with marginalized people? God plans to punish the whole community for Korach’s rebellion, but Moses and Aaron argue that it’s unfair to hold everyone accountable for one person’s actions. God gives the people an opportunity to distance themselves from Korach before everyone in his vicinity is swallowed by the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fresh Start Comes from God: Theological, Historical, and Sociological Background of the Clean-Slate Acts of Leviticus 25 and Deuteronomy 15
    A Fresh Start Comes from God: Theological, Historical, and Sociological Background of the Clean-Slate Acts of Leviticus 25 and Deuteronomy 15 Von der Theologischen Fakultät der Universität Leipzig angenommene D I S S E R T A T I O N zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades DOCTRIX PHILOSOPHIAE (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt von SandyJo Dorothea Rogers geboren am 15.08.1979 in Fort Huachuca, Arizona, the United States of America Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Schüle Dr. habil. Takayoshi Oshima Tag der Verteidigung: 11. Mai 2020 ii Selbständigkeitserklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, die vorliegende Dissertation selbständig und ohne unerlaubte fremde Hilfe angefertigt zu haben. Ich habe keine anderen als die im Schriftenverzeichnis angeführten Quellen benutzt und sämtliche Textstellen, die wörtlich oder sinngemäß aus veröffentlichten oder unveröffentlichten Schriften entnommen wurden, und alle Angaben, die auf mündlichen Auskünften beruhen, als solche kenntlich gemacht. Ebenfalls sind alle von anderen Personen bereitgestellten Materialien oder erbrachten Dienstleistungen als solche gekennzeichnet. I hereby declare that I have completed the present dissertation independently and without unauthorized assistance. I have not used any sources other than those listed in the bibliography and I have marked as such all passages of text taken literally or in spirit from published or unpublished writings and all information based on oral information. All materials or services provided by other persons are also marked as such. Leipzig, am 30.01.2020 SandyJo Dorothea Rogers Abstract The clean-slate acts of the Hebrew Bible, i.e., the Year of Jubilee in Leviticus 25 and the Šemittah Year and the Law of Slave Release in Deut 15:1-18, are a part of the tradition of clean-slate acts in the ancient Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • Parashat Korach
    Creang and Destroying: Parashat Korach It took the city of New York almost seven full years to build the iconic Twin Towers, a project that began in August of 1966 and ended in July of 1973. It took an hour and forty-two minutes for the buildings to fall aGer being struck by two hijacked commercial airlines in the terrorist aHacks of September 11. ConstrucKon of the famed ship, the Titanic, took 26 months, with over 14,000 men working for the company Harland and Wolff to build the vast luxury liner and its sister, The Olympic. It took a small fracKon of that Kme, 2 hours and forty minutes, for the great vessel to sink upon hing an iceberg on just its fourth day out of port. And although Notre Dame Cathedral, the crown jewel of France, took 182 years (!) to be constructed, it was devastated aGer burning for just 15 hours, now remaining closed unKl it can be slowly and carefully rebuilt. How much exponenKally longer does it take to create than to destroy! How very easy it is, in an instant, to wipe away all that it has taken months, years, or even decades, to culKvate and build! Of course, it is not only in the world of manufacturing or architecture that the doing of a thing is a far lengthier process than the undoing. GestaKng a human fetus takes nine full months while exKnguishing a human life can occur in an instant. While we may talk about “love at first sight,” genuine connecKon, trust, and affecKon generally grow over Kme yet can be erased almost immediately by infidelity, cruelty, and dishonest words.
    [Show full text]
  • Re'eh While It Is Becoming Cliché to Describe Events As Being
    ב " ה Re’eh While it is becoming cliché to describe events as being “different from usual” when they are held online instead of in person, it certainly felt different from usual to make my annual brief AGM appearance via Zoom. It was a pleasure seeing so many of your faces there, but I sensed the absence of certain faces which are usually part of every AGM – the faces of Mizrachi’s Presidents and Rabbis on the walls of the Goldberger Hall. When looking at the portraits of my esteemed predecessors, I am reminded that the strengths and successes we can be so proud of today are built on the immense efforts, vision and contributions of Mizrachi’s spiritual leadership of years gone by. Last Shabbat marked the 19th Yahrzeit of Rabbi Boruch Abaranok zt”l, and I am pleased to include this week some of his thoughts on Parshat Re’eh, as edited and translated by another one of my predecessors, Rabbi J Simcha Cohen zt”l. Our community is exceptionally blessed, not only to be able to speak of a proud history, but also of great promise for the future. One of the central ingredients in developing future leadership is Bnei Akiva’s Shnat programs in Israel. My heart goes out to the students and families whose Shnat plans have been frustrated and disrupted this year, and I very much hope that timing and conditions will allow for every single participant to be able to enjoy a meaningful learning experience in Israel at this formative stage of their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging Authority a D’Var Torah on Parashat Korach (Num
    Challenging Authority A D’var Torah on Parashat Korach (Num. 16:1 – 17:15) By Alan I. Friedman “Vayikach Korach … vayakumu lifnei Moshe….” “Korach took the initiative … to rise up against Moses….” Only five Torah portions — Noach, Yitro, Korach, Balak, and Pinchas — are named for individuals. (A sixth, Chayei Sarah, includes Sarah’s name but is actually about her death.) All of these parashiot have interesting messages, but only Parashat Korach provides us with a unique opportunity to examine the concept of challenging authority. In Parashat Korach, Dathan, Abiram and 250 leaders of the community join with Korach to confront Moses and Aaron and challenge their leadership and authority. “You have gone too far,” they accuse God’s chosen leaders, “for all the community are holy, all of them, and Adonai is in their midst. Why then do you raise yourselves above Adonai’s congregation?”1 When the matter is ultimately resolved, God has made clear the divine sanction of Moses and Aaron and the spiritual supremacy of the Kohanim: The earth has opened up and swallowed Dathan, Abiram, Korach, and all of their households;2 fire has consumed the 250 supporters of Korach;3 and 14,700 additional Israelites who either did not disassociate themselves from the rebellion or were unhappy with Korach’s punishment have died of a plague.4 What was wrong with Korach’s challenge to Moses and Aaron? Aren’t dissent and challenge part of the political process? Dissent, per se, is not troublesome. In fact Jewish tradition encourages dissent, but only when it serves a holy purpose, such as that between the schools of Hillel and Shamai.
    [Show full text]