DOCSLIB.ORG

Seismic Waves

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seismic Waves Seismic Waves The deepest places where people have seen the Earth’s interior are located in South Africa gold mines, some 3.5 kilometers below the surface. The deepest wells are about 10 km deep, which only scratch the surface of the Earth. Most of what we know of the Earth’s interior has come from the study of earthquakes. Earthquakes send out seismic waves in all directions similar to the way that throwing a stone into a pond sends out waves through water. Observing the behavior of these seismic waves as they travel through the earth gives us insight into the structure within the earth. HOW EARTHQUAKES FORM An earthquake occurs when rocks in a fault zone suddenly slip past each other releasing stress that has built up over time. The slippage releases seismic energy, which is dissipated through three kinds of waves: Primary (P)-waves, secondary (S)-waves, and surface (L)-waves. The distinction between these waves is similar to the wave properties we studied earlier in the semester: Primary (P)-waves are compressional or longitudinal waves that push and pull on the rocks through which they are traveling creating a back and forth movement on the Earth's surface. Primary waves travel the fastest and can move through solid and liquid rock. Secondary (S)-waves are transverse waves create an up-and-down or side-to-side motion in the underground rock through which they are traveling. S-waves travel only through solid rock and cannot travel through liquids. S-waves also travel slower than P-waves. Surface (L)-waves are produced by the motion of the primary and secondary waves striking the earth’s surface. Surface waves travel slightly slower than S-waves producing large displacements of the surface and are the most destructive of the three types of earthquake waves. epicenter The waves travel outward from the spot where rocks of the earth's crust snapped under the strain. This spot is called the hypocenter. The spot on fault line the earth's surface right above the hypocenter is called the epicenter. Earthquakes are felt the strongest at the epicenter. THE SEISMOGRAPH There are hundreds of earthquake recording stations around the hypocenter earth. Some have also been placed on the Moon and Mars to detect volcanic activity. A seismograph is an instrument that records the vertical and horizontal motion of the earth caused by an earthquake, recording the intensity of the vibration, as measured by the height of the line on the seismogram, and the vibration's frequency, which is measured by the distance between the peaks or valleys on the graph. Seismologists have developed a way of identifying the size, or magnitude of earthquakes using the Richter Scale, developed by Charles Richter in 1935. The Richter scale is a logarithmic scale so that as the magnitude increases by 1 unit the amplitude of the earthquake increases 10 times. In this laboratory you will investigate the process how the distance to an earthquake epicenter is located and how to estimate the magnitude of an earthquake. Seismic Waves 1 PART I: SIMULATING AN EARTHQUAKE During an earthquake, primary waves, or P-waves, move the fastest through the rock and thus are the first waves to be recorded by a seismograph. Secondary waves, or S-waves, are the second waves to be recorded since they travel slower than the P-waves. Knowing the difference in arrival times of these waves at a recording station allows us to determine the distance to the focus. If multiple recording stations are used it is possible to determine the location of the epicenter of the earthquake by triangulation. Launch the Gizmo from ExploreLearning The map indicates the locations of an earthquake and a recording station, and a seismogram displaying signal strength on the vertical axis and time on the horizontal axis. Click Play ( ). What does the purple circle represent? ______________________ What does the green circle represent? ______________________ Which wave (P wave or S wave) has the greater speed? _____________________ Which type of wave appears to be stronger as displayed on the seismogram? ___________________ Click Reset ( ) and then click Show Grid below the map and examine the geographical data in the legend in the lower left corner. What is the unit of distance represented by each square of the grid on the map? ______________ What is the distance from the station to the epicenter of the earthquake? ______________ Click Play ( ) to watch the animation. When the vibrations have mostly subsided, click Pause. When an earthquake occurs, it sends out fast-moving P waves and slower-moving S waves. P waves cause a fairly small vibration. S waves are much stronger and cause taller "spikes" in the seismogram. The amount of time between the arrival of the first P wave and the arrival of the first S wave is the lag time between waves, or T. Select Show time probe. Click and drag the left-hand (green) time probe to align with the onset of the first P-wave recorded on. Click and drag the right-hand (blue) time probe to align with the onset of the first S-wave recorded on the seismogram. How long did it take for the primary wave to reach the recording station? _______________ The secondary wave? _______________ Record the times for the P-wave and S-wave to reach the recording station, the difference in their times (Δ T) and the distance the recording station was from the earthquake in the table below. With the cursor grab the epicenter and move it to another location and click Play again. Record the P-wave, S-wave, Δ T, and the distance in the table. Repeat the process for three more earthquakes or a total of 5 simulations. Try to place the epicenter and recording station at distances apart that are convenient to plot, such as 400 km, 600 km, etc, keeping the distances below 1000 km. Plot the set of points for each earthquake simulation and draw a best-fit straight line for each set of data (P-wave, S-wave, Δ T). Label each of the lines. Seismic Waves 2 P-Wave Time S-Wave Time Δ T (seconds) Distance from (seconds) (seconds) Epicenter (km) S & P Wave Arrival Times 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 Distance (kilometers) Distance 200 100 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Time (seconds) Primary waves travel between 5.95 and 6.75 kilometers per second depending on the compressibility and density of the rock and are the first to arrive from a distant earthquake. Secondary waves move between 2.7 and 3.7 km/sec. What are the approximate slopes (speeds) for each wave? P-Wave _______________ km/sec S-Wave _______________ km/sec Δ T _______________ km/sec Seismic Waves 3 PART II: DETERMINING THE LOCATION OF AN EPICENTER To determine the location of an epicenter, data from multiple recording stations are triangulated. Launch the Gizmo from ExploreLearning Notice the three small graphs at the top left corner of the Gizmo. These are simulated seismograms from seismographs, which run constantly at many locations around the world. Click Play ( ) and watch the seismograms as an earthquake occurs somewhere in the world. When the vibrations have mostly subsided, click Pause. Drag one of the vertical probes and place it on the first seismogram where the first P wave arrived. Then place the second probe where the first S wave arrived. What is T for Recording station A? What is T for Recording Station B? For Recording station C? Station A Station B Station C T Distance T Distance T Distance (sec) (km) (sec) (km) (sec) (km) Using your graph from Part I, determine how far Recording station A was from the epicenter. (Make your best estimate, based on how this value for T fits in with your previous data.) In the Gizmo, select Show station A. Set the Radius slider to the distance from the epicenter. You will see a circle around Recording station A. A circle shows all the points that are the same distance from the center. In this case, the circle shows all the points that are the correct distance from Recording station A. According to your calculations, the epicenter lies somewhere on that circle. Repeat the process for Recording station B and Recording station C and record your distances in the table above. Once you have all three radii set, the three circles shown in the Gizmo should intersect at one point. That point was the epicenter of the earthquake. If you have found the correct epicenter you will see a red symbol like this: (A small red dot will appear if the three circles intersect at a point that is not the epicenter.) PART III: USING ACTUAL DATA TO DETERMINE THE EPICENTER In the real world, data from stations around the world recording the earthquake will be used to estimate the focus, epicenter, and magnitude. In this part you will use actual seismograph data to determine the epicenter. The data table on the next page shows the arrival times for the P-wave and S-waves from an earthquake that occurred in 1998. Determine the difference in arrival times (lag time) for the P and S waves. Using the distance vs time graph you obtained in Part I, estimate the distance of the epicenter to the recording station using the lag-time between the waves (ΔT). Using the scale provided on the map, spread the compass to the distance the first recording station is to the epicenter. Draw a circle centered on the recording station with a radius equal to the distance to the epicenter.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effect of Fabric Anisotropy on the Dynamic Mechanical Behavior Of
    EFFECT OF FABRIC ANISOTROPY ON THE DYNAMIC MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF GRANULAR MATERIALS by Bo Li Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Prof. Xiangwu Zeng Department of Civil Engineering Case Western Reserve University January, 2011 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Bo Li Candidate for Ph. D. degree*. (signed) Xiangwu Zeng Chair of Commitee Adel Saada Wojbor A. Woyczynski Xiong Yu (date) 11/15/2010 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein Table of Contents Table of Contents I List of Tables IV List of Figures VI Acknowledgement XI Abstract XII Notation XIV Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Effect of Anisotropy on Granular Materials ........................................................................... 1 1.2 Research Objectives ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Outline of the Dissertation ...................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Review of the Effect of Fabric Anisotropy on Clay ............................................................... 3 1.4.1 Experimental Study on Effect of Fabric Anisotropy on Clay ......................................... 3 1.4.2 Analytical Method on Effect of Fabric Anisotropy
    [Show full text]
  • Confidential Manuscript Submitted to Engineering Geology
    Confidential manuscript submitted to Engineering Geology 1 Landslide monitoring using seismic refraction tomography – The 2 importance of incorporating topographic variations 3 J S Whiteley1,2, J E Chambers1, S Uhlemann1,3, J Boyd1,4, M O Cimpoiasu1,5, J L 4 Holmes1,6, C M Inauen1, A Watlet1, L R Hawley-Sibbett1,5, C Sujitapan2, R T Swift1,7 5 and J M Kendall2 6 1 British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Nicker Hill, Keyworth, 7 Nottingham, NG12 5GG, United Kingdom. 2 School of Earth Sciences, University 8 of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, United 9 Kingdom. 3 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Earth and 10 Environmental Sciences Area, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, United 11 States of America. 4 Lancaster Environment Center (LEC), Lancaster University, 12 Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, United Kingdom 5 Division of Agriculture and Environmental 13 Science, School of Bioscience, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, 14 Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom 6 Queen’s University Belfast, School of 15 Natural and Built Environment, Stranmillis Road, Belfast, BT9 5AG, United 16 Kingdom 7 University of Liege, Applied Geophysics, Department ArGEnCo, 17 Engineering Faculty, B52, 4000 Liege, Belgium 18 19 Corresponding author: Jim Whiteley ([email protected]) 20 21 Copyright British Geological Survey © UKRI 2020/ University of Bristol 2020 22 1 Confidential manuscript submitted to Engineering Geology 23 Abstract 24 Seismic refraction tomography provides images of the elastic properties of 25 subsurface materials in landslide settings. Seismic velocities are sensitive to 26 changes in moisture content, which is a triggering factor in the initiation of many 27 landslides.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Wave Bottom Shear Stress in Shallow Depths: the Role of Wave Period and Bed Roughness
    water Article On the Wave Bottom Shear Stress in Shallow Depths: The Role of Wave Period and Bed Roughness Sara Pascolo *, Marco Petti and Silvia Bosa Dipartimento Politecnico di Ingegneria e Architettura, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (S.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0432-558-713 Received: 6 September 2018; Accepted: 25 September 2018; Published: 28 September 2018 Abstract: Lagoons and coastal semi-enclosed basins morphologically evolve depending on local waves, currents, and tidal conditions. In very shallow water depths, typical of tidal flats and mudflats, the bed shear stress due to the wind waves is a key factor governing sediment resuspension. A current line of research focuses on the distribution of wave shear stress with depth, this being a very important aspect related to the dynamic equilibrium of transitional areas. In this work a relevant contribution to this study is provided, by means of the comparison between experimental growth curves which predict the finite depth wave characteristics and the numerical results obtained by means a spectral model. In particular, the dominant role of the bottom friction dissipation is underlined, especially in the presence of irregular and heterogeneous sea beds. The effects of this energy loss on the wave field is investigated, highlighting that both the variability of the wave period and the relative bottom roughness can change the bed shear stress trend substantially. Keywords: finite depth wind waves; bottom friction dissipation; friction factor; tidal flats; bottom shear stress 1. Introduction The morphological evolution of estuarine and coastal lagoon environments is a widely discussed topic in literature, because of its complexity and the great variability of morphological patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • STRUCTURE of EARTH S-Wave Shadow P-Wave Shadow P-Wave
    STRUCTURE OF EARTH Earthquake Focus P-wave P-wave shadow shadow S-wave shadow P waves = Primary waves = Pressure waves S waves = Secondary waves = Shear waves (Don't penetrate liquids) CRUST < 50-70 km thick MANTLE = 2900 km thick OUTER CORE (Liquid) = 3200 km thick INNER CORE (Solid) = 1300 km radius. STRUCTURE OF EARTH Low Velocity Crust Zone Whole Mantle Convection Lithosphere Upper Mantle Transition Zone Layered Mantle Convection Lower Mantle S-wave P-wave CRUST : Conrad discontinuity = upper / lower crust boundary Mohorovicic discontinuity = base of Continental Crust (35-50 km continents; 6-8 km oceans) MANTLE: Lithosphere = Rigid Mantle < 100 km depth Asthenosphere = Plastic Mantle > 150 km depth Low Velocity Zone = Partially Melted, 100-150 km depth Upper Mantle < 410 km Transition Zone = 400-600 km --> Velocity increases rapidly Lower Mantle = 600 - 2900 km Outer Core (Liquid) 2900-5100 km Inner Core (Solid) 5100-6400 km Center = 6400 km UPPER MANTLE AND MAGMA GENERATION A. Composition of Earth Density of the Bulk Earth (Uncompressed) = 5.45 gm/cm3 Densities of Common Rocks: Granite = 2.55 gm/cm3 Peridotite, Eclogite = 3.2 to 3.4 gm/cm3 Basalt = 2.85 gm/cm3 Density of the CORE (estimated) = 7.2 gm/cm3 Fe-metal = 8.0 gm/cm3, Ni-metal = 8.5 gm/cm3 EARTH must contain a mix of Rock and Metal . Stony meteorites Remains of broken planets Planetary Interior Rock=Stony Meteorites ÒChondritesÓ = Olivine, Pyroxene, Metal (Fe-Ni) Metal = Fe-Ni Meteorites Core density = 7.2 gm/cm3 -- Too Light for Pure Fe-Ni Light elements = O2 (FeO) or S (FeS) B.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential of Soil by Down Borehole Method
    Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conferences on Recent Advances 2010 - Fifth International Conference on Recent in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Soil Dynamics Engineering and Soil Dynamics 26 May 2010, 4:45 pm - 6:45 pm Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential of Soil by Down Borehole Method Sumit Ghose Bengal Engineering and Science University, India Ambarish Ghosh Bengal Engineering and Science University, India Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icrageesd Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Ghose, Sumit and Ghosh, Ambarish, "Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential of Soil by Down Borehole Method" (2010). International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. 15. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icrageesd/05icrageesd/session01/15 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVALUATION OF LIQUEFACTION
    [Show full text]
  • The Growing Wealth of Aseismic Deformation Data: What's a Modeler to Model?
    The Growing Wealth of Aseismic Deformation Data: What's a Modeler to Model? Evelyn Roeloffs U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Team Vancouver, WA Topics • Pre-earthquake deformation-rate changes – Some credible examples • High-resolution crustal deformation observations – borehole strain – fluid pressure data • Aseismic processes linking mainshocks to aftershocks • Observations possibly related to dynamic triggering The Scientific Method • The “hypothesis-testing” stage is a bottleneck for earthquake research because data are hard to obtain • Modeling has a role in the hypothesis-building stage http://www.indiana.edu/~geol116/ Modeling needs to lead data collection • Compared to acquiring high resolution deformation data in the near field of large earthquakes, modeling is fast and inexpensive • So modeling should perhaps get ahead of reproducing observations • Or modeling could look harder at observations that are significant but controversial, and could explore a wider range of hypotheses Earthquakes can happen without detectable pre- earthquake changes e.g.Parkfield M6 2004 Deformation-Rate Changes before the Mw 6.6 Chuetsu earthquake, 23 October 2004 Ogata, JGR 2007 • Intraplate thrust earthquake, depth 11 km • GPS-detected rate changes about 3 years earlier – Moment of pre-slip approximately Mw 6.0 (1 div=1 cm) – deviations mostly in direction of coseismic displacement – not all consistent with pre-slip on the rupture plane Great Subduction Earthquakes with Evidence for Pre-Earthquake Aseismic Deformation-Rate Changes • Chile 1960, Mw9.2 – 20-30 m of slow interplate slip over a rupture zone 920+/-100 km long, starting 20 minutes prior to mainshock [Kanamori & Cipar (1974); Kanamori & Anderson (1975); Cifuentes & Silver (1989) ] – 33-hour foreshock sequence north of the mainshock, propagating toward the mainshock hypocenter at 86 km day-1 (Cifuentes, 1989) • Alaska 1964, Mw9.2 • Cascadia 1700, M9 Microfossils => Sea level rise before1964 Alaska M9.2 • 0.12± 0.13 m sea level rise at 4 sites between 1952 and 1964 Hamilton et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining P-Wave and S-Wave Stratal Surfaces with Nine-Component Vsps
    INTERPRETER’S CORNER Coordinated by Rebecca B. Latimer Defining P-wave and S-wave stratal surfaces with nine-component VSPs BOB A. HARDAGE, MICHAEL DEANGELO, and PAUL MURRAY, Bureau of Economic Geology, Austin, Texas, U.S. Nine-component vertical seismic profile (9C VSP) data were acquired across a three-state area (Texas, Kansas, Colorado) to evaluate the relative merits of imaging Morrow and post-Morrow stratigraphy with compressional (P-wave) seismic data and shear (S-wave) seismic data. 9C VSP data generated using three orthogonal vector sources were used in this study rather than 3C data generated by only a ver- tical-displacement source because the important SH shear mode would not have been available if only the latter had been acquired. The popular SV converted mode (or C wave) utilized in 3C seismic technology is created by P-to-SV mode conversions at nonvertical angles of incidence at subsurface interfaces rather than propagating directly from an SV source as in 9C data acquisition. In contrast, 9C acquisition generates a P-wave mode and both fundamental S-wave modes (SH and SV) directly at the source station and allows these three basic compo- nents of the elastic seismic wavefield to be isolated from each other for imaging purposes. The purpose of these field tests was to compare SH, SV, and P reflectivity at targeted inter- faces. Because C waves were not an imaging objective, we used zero-offset acquisition geometry, which caused C-wave reflectivity to be quite small. We consider zero offset a source- to-receiver offset that is less than one-tenth of the depth to the shallowest receiver station.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquake Measurements
    EARTHQUAKE MEASUREMENTS The vibrations produced by earthquakes are detected, recorded, and measured by instruments call seismographs1. The zig-zag line made by a seismograph, called a "seismogram," reflects the changing intensity of the vibrations by responding to the motion of the ground surface beneath the instrument. From the data expressed in seismograms, scientists can determine the time, the epicenter, the focal depth, and the type of faulting of an earthquake and can estimate how much energy was released. Seismograph/Seismometer Earthquake recording instrument, seismograph has a base that sets firmly in the ground, and a heavy weight that hangs free2. When an earthquake causes the ground to shake, the base of the seismograph shakes too, but the hanging weight does not. Instead the spring or string that it is hanging from absorbs all the movement. The difference in position between the shaking part of the seismograph and the motionless part is Seismograph what is recorded. Measuring Size of Earthquakes The size of an earthquake depends on the size of the fault and the amount of slip on the fault, but that’s not something scientists can simply measure with a measuring tape since faults are many kilometers deep beneath the earth’s surface. They use the seismogram recordings made on the seismographs at the surface of the earth to determine how large the earthquake was. A short wiggly line that doesn’t wiggle very much means a small earthquake, and a long wiggly line that wiggles a lot means a large earthquake2. The length of the wiggle depends on the size of the fault, and the size of the wiggle depends on the amount of slip.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Magnitude: a Historical Perspective
    Pure Appl. Geophys. 176 (2019), 3815–3849 Ó 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1994-7 Pure and Applied Geophysics Energy and Magnitude: A Historical Perspective 1 EMILE A. OKAL Abstract—We present a detailed historical review of early referred to as ‘‘Gutenberg [and Richter]’s energy– attempts to quantify seismic sources through a measure of the magnitude relation’’ features a slope of 1.5 which is energy radiated into seismic waves, in connection with the parallel development of the concept of magnitude. In particular, we explore not predicted a priori by simple physical arguments. the derivation of the widely quoted ‘‘Gutenberg–Richter energy– We will use Gutenberg and Richter’s (1956a) nota- magnitude relationship’’ tion, Q [their Eq. (16) p. 133], for the slope of log10 E versus magnitude [1.5 in (1)]. log10 E ¼ 1:5Ms þ 11:8 ð1Þ We are motivated by the fact that Eq. (1)istobe (E in ergs), and especially the origin of the value 1.5 for the slope. found nowhere in this exact form in any of the tra- By examining all of the relevant papers by Gutenberg and Richter, we note that estimates of this slope kept decreasing for more than ditional references in its support, which incidentally 20 years before Gutenberg’s sudden death, and that the value 1.5 were most probably copied from one referring pub- was obtained through the complex computation of an estimate of lication to the next. They consist of Gutenberg and the energy flux above the hypocenter, based on a number of assumptions and models lacking robustness in the context of Richter (1954)(Seismicity of the Earth), Gutenberg modern seismological theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Foreshocks and Short Term Deformation in the Source Area of Major Earthquakes
    Characteristics of Foreshocks and Short Term Deformation in the Source Area of Major Earthquakes Peter Molnar Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 USGS CONTRACT NO. 14-08-0001-17759 Supported by the EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM OPEN-FILE NO.81-287 U.S. Geological Survey OPEN FILE REPORT This report was prepared under contract to the U.S. Geological Survey and has not been reviewed for conformity with USGS editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Opinions and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the USGS. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. Appendix A A Study of the Haicheng Foreshock Sequence By Lucile Jones, Wang Biquan and Xu Shaoxie (English Translation of a Paper Published in Di Zhen Xue Bao (Journal of Seismology), 1980.) Abstract We have examined the locations and radiation patterns of the foreshocks to the 4 February 1978 Haicheng earthquake. Using four stations, the foreshocks were located relative to a master event. They occurred very close together, no more than 6 kilo­ meters apart. Nevertheless, there appear to have been too clusters of foreshock activity. The majority of events seem to have occurred in a cluster to the east of the master event along a NNE-SSW trend. Moreover, all eight foreshocks that we could locate and with a magnitude greater than 3.0 occurred in this group. The're also "appears to be a second cluster of foresfiocks located to the northwest of the first. Thus it seems possible that the majority of foreshocks did not occur on the rupture plane of the mainshock, which trends WNW, but on another plane nearly perpendicualr to the mainshock.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal and Spatial Evolution Analysis of Earthquake Events in California and Nevada Based on Spatial Statistics
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article Temporal and Spatial Evolution Analysis of Earthquake Events in California and Nevada Based on Spatial Statistics Weifeng Shan 1,2 , Zhihao Wang 2, Yuntian Teng 1,* and Maofa Wang 3 1 Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China; [email protected] 2 School of Emergency Management, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Langfang 065201, China; [email protected] 3 School of Computer and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Science and Technology, Guilin 541004, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Studying the temporal and spatial evolution trends in earthquakes in an area is beneficial for determining the earthquake risk of the area so that local governments can make the correct decisions for disaster prevention and reduction. In this paper, we propose a new method for analyzing the temporal and spatial evolution trends in earthquakes based on earthquakes of magnitude 3.0 or above from 1980 to 2019 in California and Nevada. The experiment’s results show that (1) the frequency of earthquake events of magnitude 4.5 or above present a relatively regular change trend of decreasing–rising in this area; (2) by using the weighted average center method to analyze the spatial concentration of earthquake events of magnitude 3.0 or above in this region, we find that the weighted average center of the earthquake events in this area shows a conch-type movement law, where it moves closer to the center from all sides; (3) the direction of the spatial distribution of earthquake events in this area shows a NW–SE pattern when the standard deviational ellipse (SDE) Citation: Shan, W.; Wang, Z.; Teng, method is used, which is basically consistent with the direction of the San Andreas Fault Zone across Y.; Wang, M.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is an Earthquake?
    A Violent Pulse: Earthquakes Chapter 8 part 2 Earthquakes and the Earth’s Interior What is an Earthquake? Seismicity • ‘Earth shaking caused by a rapid release of energy.’ • Seismicity (‘quake or shake) cause by… – Energy buildup due tectonic – Motion along a newly formed crustal fracture (or, stresses. fault). – Cause rocks to break. – Motion on an existing fault. – Energy moves outward as an expanding sphere of – A sudden change in mineral structure. waves. – Inflation of a – This waveform energy can magma chamber. be measured around the globe. – Volcanic eruption. • Earthquakes destroy – Giant landslides. buildings and kill people. – Meteorite impacts. – 3.5 million deaths in the last 2000 years. – Nuclear detonations. • Earthquakes are common. Faults and Earthquakes Earthquake Concepts • Focus (or Hypocenter) - The place within Earth where • Most earthquakes occur along faults. earthquake waves originate. – Faults are breaks or fractures in the crust… – Usually occurs on a fault surface. – Across which motion has occurred. – Earthquake waves expand outward from the • Over geologic time, faulting produces much change. hypocenter. • The amount of movement is termed displacement. • Epicenter – Land surface above the focus pocenter. • Displacement is also called… – Offset, or – Slip • Markers may reveal the amount of offset. Fence separated by fault 1 Faults and Fault Motion Fault Types • Faults are like planar breaks in blocks of crust. • Fault type based on relative block motion. • Most faults slope (although some are vertical). – Normal fault • On a sloping fault, crustal blocks are classified as: • Hanging wall moves down. – Footwall (block • Result from extension (stretching). below the fault). – Hanging wall – Reverse fault (block above • Hanging wall moves up.
    [Show full text]