State Forests and Parks of Massachusetts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Stony Brook University
SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... Exploratory Steatite Source Characterization in the Long Island Sound Watershed A Thesis Presented by Mark Stephenson Tweedie to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology (Archaeology) Stony Brook University December 2014 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Mark Stephenson Tweedie We, the thesis committee for the above candidate for the Master of Arts degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this thesis. John J. Shea, PhD. - Advisor Associate Professor, Anthropological Sciences E. Troy Rasbury, PhD. - Second Reader Associate Professor, Geosciences Nina M. Versaggi, PhD. - Outside Reader Associate Professor, Binghamton University This thesis is accepted by the Graduate School Charles Taber Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Thesis Exploratory Steatite Source Characterization in the Long Island Sound Watershed by Mark Stephenson Tweedie Master of Arts in Anthropology (Archaeology) Stony Brook University 2014 For as long as humans have incorporated stone into their material culture, they have used cooperative strategies (i.e., exchange networks) to mitigate the uneven distribution of available resources on the landscape. The procurement, transport, and selective distribution of lithic materials are thus uniquely human social institutions. One of the few ways to examine the limited evidence for this behavior in the archaeological record is through the geochemical characterization of artifacts and their potential source areas. Steatite cooking vessels recovered on the outer coastal plain of Long Island, New York, are unique in that their acquisition required water-borne transportation from quarries in Connecticut, Massachusetts, or Rhode Island. -
Chapter 4: Outdoor Recreational Resources— Hampshire County
CHAPTER 4: OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL RESOURCES— HAMPSHIRE COUNTY Introduction With its rolling hills, cascading waters, deep forests, open meadows, and abundance of open space, the Route 112 Scenic Byway corridor is an extraordinary outdoor playground for residents and visitors alike. Opportunities abound in the region to hike, camp, swim, boat, cross‐country ski, hunt, fish, and cycle. In the Hampshire County section of the corridor, there are nearly 30 square miles of open space available for multiple recreational opportunities, including 5,803 acres within state forests and parks, 10,669 acres within wildlife management areas, and 1,919 acres within other significant open space lands. The greatest recreational treasures in Hampshire County include the Westfield River with its federal Wild and Scenic designation, and the extensive 7,900‐acre wilderness area created by the adjoining lands of the Knightville Dam Wildlife Management and Recreation Area, the Gilbert A. Bliss State Forest, and the Hiram H. Fox Wildlife Management Area. This Outdoor Recreational Resources chapter and accompanying map provide an inventory of recreational resources developed through a review of Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation listings, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s MassWildlife listings, information from the Commonwealth’s Office of Geographic and Environmental Information (MassGIS), and narratives within the Open Space and Recreation Plans of Byway towns. Resources are described here by type of facility (State Forest and Parks, and Wildlife The Westfield River Wildwater Races, an annual spring event for more Management Areas) and than 55 years, attracts boating enthusiasts from across the northeast. by type of activity (hiking trails, camping, swimming, boating, cross‐country skiing and snowshoeing, hunting and fishing, bicycling, and golfing). -
Developing a Strategy Guide for Trail Planning in Princeton, Massachusetts
2020 DEVELOPING A STRATEGY GUIDE FOR TRAIL PLANNING IN PRINCETON, MASSACHUSETTS Matthew Karns Mason Ocasio Steven Pardo Mackenzie Warren Advisors John-Michael Davis 0 Hektor Kashuri Developing a Strategy Guide for Trail Planning in Princeton, Massachusetts An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science by: Matthew Karns Mason Ocasio Steven Pardo Mackenzie Warren Date: May 13th, 2020 Report Submitted to: Rick Gardner Princeton Open Space Committee Professor John-Michael Davis Professor Hektor Kashuri Worcester Polytechnic Institute This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects. ABSTRACT Princeton, Massachusetts, has faced challenges negotiating with private and government entities to develop a town-wide connected recreational trail system. This project provides a detailed strategy guide for the Princeton Open Space Committee to overcome these challenges and develop future trails in Princeton. To achieve this, we conducted a GIS analysis of existing trails, consulted with key stakeholders to determine trail building regulations, and interviewed 11 local trail planning groups to determine best practices for trail standards and maintenance plans. Based on our findings, we provided a comprehensive trail map and recommendations to advance future trail projects. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Our group would like to thank the following people and organizations for supporting this project: ● The Princeton Open Space Committee, for an opportunity to complete this project. -
LANDKEEPERS REPORT Fall 2020
BERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL Fall 2020 LANDKEEPERSREPORT Make Some Autumn Memories Resilience and Heritage You’ve Protected More Land—Thank You! Wildlife on Camera LANDKEEPERS REPORT Fall 2020 Board of Directors Jenny Hansell, President Tim Crane, Chairman Pat Callahan, Vice Chairman Kim Seward, Secretary Tom Curtin, Treasurer Stephen Alsdorf Jeffrey Belair Gregg Charbonneau Walter Cliff Susan Crofut Henry Flint Caroline Holland Larry Lane Wendy Linscott The view from Spruce Hill in North Adams. Tim Lovett BNRC STAFF PHOTO: Donald MacGillis John Mancia Karen Coy Ross FINDING MOMENTS OF GRACE Ron Shaw Elena Traister My college-aged children arrived rescuing them. They counted nearly Staff home abruptly last March, and a thousand dead on the road, but Mariah Auman have barely left the house since. It’s saved at least that many. Learn more Volunteer & Outreach Coordinator been hard, but we made the best about wildlife on BNRC reserves on Tyler Fogg of it: family movie nights, ping pong page 4 and be sure to let us know Trails Coordinator tournaments and, especially, hiking. what you are seeing on the trails. Adam Galambos My daughter Abbey, 21, is Just as this issue was going to Conservation Associate always game to accompany me on press, we learned that Don MacGillis, Roxanne Gawthrop a new trail. For both of us, hiking is a long-time BNRC supporter and Donor Relations Manager break from phones, politics and the Board member since 2018, died in a Mackenzie Greer pandemic, and it’s a great chance hiking accident on Mount Katahdin. Director of Public Programs to build a new mother-daughter We will have a full appreciation of Josh Hopmans Stewardship Associate connection. -
Draft Report
IPSWICH BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT ACT PLANNING GRANT FY17 DRAFT REPORT 20173509.001A JUNE 19, 2017 This project has been financed partially with State Capital Funds from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (the Department) under a Sustainable Water Management Initiative Grant. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Department, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. TOWN OF DANVERS TOWN OF MIDDLETON TOWN OF HAMILTON LYNNFIELD CENTER WATER DISTRICT TOWN OF TOPSFIELD TOWN OF WENHAM WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report © 2017 Kleinfelder THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report © 2017 Kleinfelder A Report Prepared for: The Town of Danvers, MA In partnership with: Town of Middleton, MA Town of Hamilton, MA Lynnfield Center Water District Town of Topsfield, MA Town of Wenham, MA IPSWICH BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT ACT PLANNING GRANT FY17 DRAFT REPORT Prepared by: Kirsten N. Ryan, P.G.(NH) Project Manager; Principal Hydrogeologist Reviewed by: Elizabeth C. Frederick Principal Planner KLEINFELDER 215 First Street, Suite 320 Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617.497.7800 Fax: 617.498.4630 June 19, 2017 20173509.001A WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report Page i of v DRAFT June 19, 2017 © 2017 Kleinfelder ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS to be added WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report Page ii of v DRAFT June 19, 2017 © 2017 Kleinfelder TABLE OF CONTENTS ____________________________________________________________________________ Section Page 0 EXECUTIVE -
Continuous Forest Inventory 2014
Manual for Continuous Forest Inventory Field Procedures Bureau of Forestry Division of State Parks and Recreation February 2014 Massachusetts Department Conservation and Recreation Manual for Continuous Forest Inventory Field Procedures Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation February, 2014 Preface The purpose of this manual is to provide individuals involved in collecting continuous forest inventory data on land administered by the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation with clear instructions for carrying out their work. This manual was first published in 1959. It has undergone minor revisions in 1960, 1961, 1964 and 1979, and 2013. Major revisions were made in April, 1968, September, 1978 and March, 1998. This manual is a minor revision of the March, 1998 version and an update of the April 2010 printing. TABLE OF CONTENTS Plot Location and Establishment The Crew 3 Equipment 3 Location of Established Plots 4 The Field Book 4 New CFI Plot Location 4 Establishing a Starting Point 4 The Route 5 Traveling the Route to the Plot 5 Establishing the Plot Center 5 Establishing the Witness Trees 6 Monumentation 7 Establishing the Plot Perimeter 8 Tree Data General 11 Tree Number 11 Azimuth 12 Distance 12 Tree Species 12-13 Diameter Breast Height 13-15 Tree Status 16 Product 17 Sawlog Height 18 Sawlog Percent Soundness 18 Bole Height 19 Bole Percent Soundness 21 Management Potential 21 Sawlog Tree Grade 23 Hardwood Tree Grade 23 Eastern White Pine Tree Grade 24 Quality Determinant 25 Crown Class 26 Mechanical Loss -
Massachusetts
Geology and Ground-Water Conditions in the Wilmington-Reading Are? Massachusetts By JOHN A. BAKER, HENRY G. HEALY, and O. M. HACKETT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WAT E R-S U P.PLY PAPER 1694 Prepared in cooperation with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Public ff^orks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 IOT mIOR ^Ucrtlon appears after the The CONTENTS Page Abstract-...________.-_---_----_-_________________________-______-_ 1 Introduction._____________________________________________________ 2 Location and description of the area____-__-i________-___________ 2 Purpose and scope of the report.________________________________ 3 Acknowledgments.__-----_-___-________-___--___-_---____----_ 4 Previous investigations._-_-_--_______________-___-_----____-___ 5 Methods of investigation_______________________________________ 5 General features of the area.________________________________________ 6 Climate_ ________--_-__---_-_________-___-________-_-__-____-_ 6 Topography and drainage______________________________________ 8 Soils and land cover.__________________________________________ 9 Summary of general hydrology and water supply ______________________ 10 Geologic units and the occurrence of ground water_____________________ 13 Bedrock._____________________________________________________ 15 Tin consolidated deposits. -__-_-_____-__--____-_____._______----_ 21 Till-__-_-___-_--------_---______-----_----_-__----------_ 23 Ice-contact deposits..._____________________________________ 26 Outwash.________________________________________________ -
Singletracks #41 December 1998
The Magazine of the New England Mountain Bike Association December 1998 Number 41 SSingleingleTTrackrackSS FlyingFlyingFlyingFlying HighHighHighHigh WithWithWithWith MerlinMerlinMerlinMerlin NEMBANEMBA goesgoes WWestest HotHot WinterWinter Tips!Tips! BlueBlue HillsHills MountainMountain FFestest OFF THE FRONT Howdy, Partner! artnerships are where it's at. Whether it's captain NEMBA is working closely with the equestrian group, and stoker tandemming through the forest, you the Bay State Trail Riders Association. Not only did the Pand your buds heading off to explore uncharted groups come together to ride and play a bit of poker to trails, or whether it's organizations like NEMBA teaming celebrate the new trails at Mt. Grace State Forest in up with other groups, partnerships make good things Warwick MA, but over the course of the summer they happen. also built new trail loops in Upton State Forest. Many of the misunderstandings between the horse and bike Much of this issue is about partnerships -- set were thrown out the window as they jockeyed for well, maybe not of the squeeze kind-- and position and shared the trails. There are already plans why they're good for New England trails. In for a second Hooves and Pedals, so if you missed the October, GB NEMBA's trail experts took first one, don't miss the next. leadership roles in an Appalachian Mountain Club project designed to assess NEMBA's been building many bridges over the last year, the trails of the Middlesex Fells both literally and figuratively. We're working closely Reservation. Armed with cameras and clip- with more land managers and parks than I can count boards, they led teams across the trails to and we've probably put in just as many bridges and determine the state of the dirt and to figure boardwalks! We’ve also secured $3000 of funding to out which ones needed some tender loving overhaul the map of the Lynn Woods working together care. -
New Marlborough Open Space 2004
New Marlborough Open Space and Recreation Plan March, 2004 2 Table of Contents Section One: Plan Summary 5 Section Two: Statement of Purpose 7 Planning Process and Public Participation 7 Section Three: Community Se�ing 9 Section Four: Environmental Inventory and Analysis 15 A. Geology, Soils, and Topography 15 B. Landscape Character 18 C. Water Resources 18 D. Vegetation 21 E. Fisheries and Wildlife 26 F. Scenic Resources and Unique Environments 27 G. Environmental Challenges 29 Section Five: Inventory of Lands of Conservation 31 and Recreation Interest 31 A. Private Parcels With Permanent Protection 32 B. Private Parcels With Temporary Protection 35 C. Public and Nonprofit Protected Parcels 35 Section Six: Community Goals 39 A. Description of Process 39 B. Statement of Open Space and Recreation Goals 39 Section Seven: Analysis of Needs 41 A. Summary of Resource Protection Needs 41 B. Summary of Community’s Needs 43 C. Management Needs 44 Section Eight: Goals and Objectives 47 Section Nine: Five-Year Action Plan 49 Section Ten: Public Comments 59 Section Eleven: References 61 Appendix 64 3 4 Section One: Plan Summary Section One: Plan Summary Preserving rural character and protecting natural resources are the primary goals for the 2004 New Marlborough Open Space and Recreation Plan (OSRP). Situated in the most southern part of Berkshire County, New Marlborough is off the beaten path, roughly twenty miles from the nearest exit of the Massachuse�s Turnpike. The residents take pride in their sense of place and wish to maintain it. Recent decades of broad economic and demographic changes in New England are affecting the small, rural community of New Marlborough. -
A Strategic Plan
MISSION: Rehabilitation Schell Memorial Bridge A Strategic Plan Friends of Schell Bridge • Northfield, Massachusetts Credits Friends of Schell Bridge Cover photo: Bruce Kahn In 2003 Schell Memorial Bridge was named by PreservatiON Mass as Back Cover Photo: Marie Ferré one of the ten most endangered historical landmarks in Massachusetts. Layout: allthumbs.org Galvanized by this honor, Friends of Schell Bridge in 2004 formally incorporated as a non-profit organization to save the bridge and to generate interest in rehabilitating the bridge for pedestrian and bicycle Sources paths. Friends of Schell Bridge (FSB) contacted the Picker Engineering Schell Memorial Bridge Program at Smith College for an independent assessment of the HAER #MA-111 condition of the bridge. A senior student design team, working with memory.loc.gov/ammem/ two professional structural engineers from New York City evaluated and tested components of the bridge. Their detailed report in 2005 Core Habitats of Northfield emphasized that the bridge structure, while some components needed BioMap and Living Waters: to be replaced, was structurally sound and a good candidate for Guiding Land Conservation for rehabilitation. Biodiversity in In 2006, FSB spent significant energy in building community support. Massachusetts. A petition circulated gathered 1400 supporters, including 700 in the Massachusetts Division of small town of Northfield. In 2007, FSB successfully rallied voters to Fisheries and Wildlife © 2004. reverse a Select Board decision so that the Schell Bridge, eligible since 1982, will finally be nominated for the National Register of Historic Schell Bridge, Places. Historic Bridges of Michigan & Elsewhere Following an informational meeting with the Massachusetts Highway Department in September 2006, FSB decided to develop a strategic www.historicbridges.org plan to save the bridge as an historic treasure by highlighting the recreational, economic and environmental values of Schell Bridge Carl Compton, “Story of the for the twenty-first century. -
Baker-Polito Administration Announces 13Th Annual Park Serve Day State Park Clean-Up Events Set for Saturday, April 27, 2019
Mass.gov PRESS RELEASE Baker-Polito Administration Announces 13th Annual Park Serve Day State Park Clean-Up Events Set for Saturday, April 27, 2019 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 4/10/2019 Department of Conservation & Recreation MEDIA CONTACT Olivia Dorrance, Press Secretary Phone (617) 626-4967 (tel:6176264967) Online [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) BOSTON — The Baker-Polito Administration today announced that the 13th Annual Park Serve Day event will be held on Saturday, April 27, 2019, with more than 37 volunteer activities coordinated throughout the Commonwealth with the assistance of several organizations and stakeholders. Created in 2006 as a statewide initiative to encourage a day of volunteerism, Park Serve Day enables the public to partner with state government in an effort to prepare the Commonwealth’s many state parks and beaches for the upcoming spring and summer seasons. Since Park Serve Day began, thousands of individuals have volunteered in an effort to make a difference, such as assisting in cleaning coastlines, clearing trails, picking up litter, planting flowers, and other important tasks. “Our administration is grateful to the thousands of volunteers who will get outside with friends and neighbors to improve state parks throughout the Commonwealth on Park Serve Day,” said Governor Charlie Baker. “We look forward to working with local officials on a successful 2019 recreational season.” “We thank the teams of volunteers in state parks across Massachusetts for their dedication and hard work to help get the state park system ready for this year’s season,” said Lieutenant Governor Karyn Polito. -
Town of Erving
Design Alternatives for the Reuse of USHER MILLS Prepared for Town of Erving 12 East Main Street Index Erving, MA 01344 INTRODUCTION AND GOALS 1 CONTEXT 2 CONTEXT-HISTORY 3 BROWNFIELD DESIGNATION 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS CROSS SECTION 6 ACCESS, CIRCULATION, AND RARE SPECIES 7 LEGAL ANALYSIS 8 SUMMARY ANALYSIS 9 COMMON ELEMENTS OF DESIGN ALTERNATIVES 10 DESIGN ALTERNATIVE #1 11 DESIGN ALTERNATIVE #2 12 DESIGN ALTERNATIVE #3 13 DESIGN ALTERNATIVE #4 14 DESIGN PRECEDENTS ALTERNATIVES #1 & #2 15 DESIGN PRECEDENTS ALTERNATIVES #3 & #4 16 PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE 17 RECOMMENDATIONS 18 Design Alternatives for the Reuse of Karen H. Dunn FALL 2010 Karen H. Dunn, FALL 2010 USHER MILLS Conway School of Landscape Design1 Conway School of Landscape Design Town of Erving 332 South Deerfield Road, Conway, MA 01341 12 E Main Street, Erving, MA 01344 332 South Deerfield Road, Conway, MA 1801341 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. THIS DRAWING IS PART OF A STUDENT PROJECT AND IS NOT BASED ON A LEGAL SURVEY. All of the Usher Mills project goals are in harmony with the goals and objectives of the Town of Erving 2002 Master Plan and the 2010 Open Space and Recreation Plan. These guides provide a framework for decisions dealing with land uses that may impact valuable natural resources and the lands that contain unique historical, recreational, and scenic values. Goals and objectives of the two plans that relate to the Usher Mills site include • Prioritize Town-sponsored land protection projects that conserve forestland, drinking water, streams and ponds, open fields, scenic views, wildlife habitat, river access and wetlands.