DOCSLIB.ORG

Military History Group U3A Dorking Newsletter Number 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Military History Group U3A Dorking Newsletter Number 6 14 January 2021 Military History Group U3A Dorking Newsletter Number 6 Meetings via Zoom during Pandemic From Group Leader Barrie Friend Parish Notes Fellow enthusiasts Greetings and good hopes for a speedy permanent change in direction of those wretched Covid graphs as we remain sensibly isolated and the vaccine’s effect starts to show. Our monthly talks will continue on Zoom for a little while longer yet and we will be introducing more guest speakers. Our January Zoom talk was well attended by over forty members and guests. You gave our first guest speaker, Mike Smith, a warm welcome and positive comments on his talk on The Battle of Gallipoli 1915/16. One of the guests invited to hear the talk was Mike Fox, U3A’s Military History Advisor, and member of the U3A Banstead group. 1 He has sent a link to his talk on Arnhem which includes errors in the film A Bridge too Far: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTUC79o4Kmc We look forward to his support in the coming months. Another guest invited was our speaker’s cousin, Valerie Steele, who lives in New Zealand showing the reach of Zoom as a powerful communication tool. Maybe Dorking U3A can claim to be the first British U3A group which has a New Zealand ‘Chapter’? New Zealand has some 84 U3A groups across both North and South Islands and viewing their website www.u3a.nz makes for extremely interesting reading. In The Great War the troops from New Zealand were described as ‘coming from the furthest ends of the earth’ to fight for king and country and further support came from Britain’s other colonies and dominions. Without the help of these countries the British Expeditionary Forces at Gallipoli and the Western Front would have suffered severe setbacks. The statistics are eye opening. 12% British population, some 5.7 million, served in the war. The colonies and dominions supplied a further 3 million, increasing the British figure by nearly 50% . 8.5% of the Australian population and 12% of the New Zealand population served. 18,000 New Zealand troops were killed, 60,000 Australians. Their memorials and headstones remain sad reminders on the Western Front and Gallipoli. The story of the Australians and New Zealanders were included in Mike Smith’s talk on Gallipoli, the first battle for the ANZACs. This talk is now available Dorking U3A YouTube. Our next Zoom talk is on Tuesday 2nd February at 1030 am. Was the Royal Navy ‘Invincible’ in 1914? Find out the truth behind this headline in George Blundell- Pound’s talk. Our Royal Navy ‘ruled the waves’ but lost its first battle against the Imperial German Navy in November 1914 at Coronel, off the Chilean coast. Five weeks later the tables were turned at the Battle of The Falklands. It’s all in George’s talk! MH Zoom Meeting Time: Feb 2, 2021 10:30 AM London Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/94980775518?pwd=Vnk3Ukt0TGJlT1JSYVAyaFpIZ1UyQT09 Meeting ID: 949 8077 5518 Passcode: 247543 2 Programme for 2021 February 2 Was the Royal Navy ‘Invincible’ in 1914? George Blundell- Pound’s March 3 Jim Barnes April 6 May 4 June 8 July 6 August 3 September 7 Zoom Presentations https://www.danhillmilitaryhistorian.com/archive DARDANELLES / GALLIPOLI February 1915 to January 1916 Michael Smith – January Zoom presentation to MHG YouTube link to Mike's talk: https://youtu.be/ExmfxReZ9gI Recurring and enduring perceptions of this campaign in the Great War include: • It was an unmitigated disaster for the Allies • It was the sole idea & responsibility of Winston Churchill, as First Lord of the Admiralty • The greatest contribution was by the ANZACs (Australia & New Zealand Army Corps), who were under incompetent British field officers • Mustafa Kemal’s (later Ataturk) leadership was largely responsible for the Ottoman Victory • The only successful aspect from the Allies side was the evacuation Mike Smith’s presentation sought to review and re consider the above, as well as the chronology of the campaign. Germany’s strategy for the Great war (mainly the Schlieffen Plan) was to NOT be fighting on two fronts. To this end it would firstly, quickly knock out France 3 in the West, then using its railway network move its army to the East to fight the real threat: Russia, which would take much longer to fully mobilise than the French. There is some argument that when the Germans failed to capture Paris (the miracle of the Marne, etc) in 1914, it would then inevitably eventually lose the war, as it was then destined to fight on two fronts Britain’s role in this early part of the war was to dominate the seas and blockade Germany with its huge Navy; contributing only a small army force (The BEF) to help Belgium & France. The Ottomans were seen as a collapsing empire, “The Sick Man of Europe “(by 1914 they had lost almost all of their European possessions) and perceived as a soft touch for circling predatory powers (Russia, France, Britain. Germany and its Central Powers allies naturally wanted the Ottomans as allies. As early as 3 November 1914 Churchill ordered a Naval attack on the Dardanelles (2 British Battle cruisers & 2 French Battleships). The 20-minute bombardment was to test the Ottoman defences and of course alerted the defenders to strengthen their defences and lay more sea minefields. The Ottomans declared war on the Allies on 11 Nov 1914 and the defences of the Dardanelles/ Gallipoli were under the direction of senior officers from Germany (General Otto Liman von Sanders). With the strategic situation in Europe in stalemate in winter 1914/1915 a new front using part of Britain’s huge Navy (which had been engaged in relatively small battles, while waiting for German Navy to try to break out of port into the North Sea) to mount a Naval attack through the Dardanelles to capture Constantinople ( Istanbul ) thereby allowing supplies through the Black Sea to help keep struggling Russia in the War seemed like a god plan….to some . 4 The Navy, however, was not over enthusiastic and part grudgingly allocated a rather second division pre dreadnought fleet, in addition to the modern battleship HMS Queen Elizabeth, Battlecruiser HMS Inflexible and the world’s first seaplane carrier: HMS Ark Royal. The fleet set sail with contingents from Britain, France, Russia & Australia. Long range bombardment of the Ottoman forts guarding the Dardanelles started on 19 February 1915 and the attempt to sail through the narrow would be made on 18 March 1915. The Dardanelles are 38 miles long and 1500 metres wide at narrowest point, heavily defended by gun emplacements and multiple ranks of sea minefields. The fleet losses were the highest since Trafalgar and the decision was made to withdraw. The failure was attributed to gross underestimation of Ottoman/ German defences, outdated fleet, failure to realise extent of minefields (despite use of Scout planes), accurate fire from stable land-based howitzers and lack of aggressive follow through. The invasion plan was revised and it was decided to deploy a Combined Operations assault by the Navy, the Army and a few aircraft. The army’s role would be to knock out the forts allowing the Navy to sail through the Dardanelles, capture Istanbul and so on, as before (note Army to enable Navy: not to invade Gallipoli, as such) The British army contingent contained only one regular division: the 29th under Lt Gen Aylmer Hunter-Weston, who Douglas Haig had described as “ rank amateur” ) and a three Gurkha battalions, all the rest of the Army , including the ANZACS ( who were ALL volunteers) were basically recently recruited “ Citizens soldiers”, who had never been in battle & were scarcely trained. The Navy was to land the Army at several beaches: the French on the Asian side, the main force on five beaches at Helles Point in the South of Gallipoli and the Anzacs further north on the European side. There was also a feint towards Bulair from Skyros (where the Germans had initially expected the amphibious assault was to take place) 5 There was not the slightest element of secrecy or surprise The targets for the first day were capture of the town of Krithia and the heights of Achi Baba by the main force and the heights of Gaba Tepe by the ANZACs. A brief summary of the Cape Helles beaches: “S” beach:2/South Wales Borderers: Largest beach; smallest force; almost no opposition: a complete success “V” beach: the main landing force (1/Royal Munster Fusiliers; 1/ Royal Dublin Fusiliers & 2/ Hampshires) from converted collier SS River Clyde. Very heavily opposed, small beach surrounded by high cliffs. Very heavy British casualties (1,200). 6 “W” beach (aka “the Lancashire landing”). Men of the 1/ Lancs Fusiliers were awarded the famous Six VCs before breakfast. Very well defended, but British had firm hold after 533 casualties “X” beach 2/ Royal Fusiliers: almost no opposition “Y” beach 1/ Kings Own Scottish Borderers: landed unopposed; a British officer strolled into Krithia & bought some fruit. “Z” Beach (aka Ari Burnu/ Gaba Tepe / later called ANZAC Cove) Troops landed north of intended landing area (various reasons cited) but this, at least, meant that landings were only lightly opposed and almost all of the 16,00 were able to make their way inland: to then face fierce, mainly trench based, opposition. 7 Again, the plan was to take & hold the high ground, but again this largely failed due to underestimating Ottoman opposition & numbers who were fighting from the high ground and on their homeland soil. In the south the French, who had made only 7 km progress on the Asian side crossed back over the strait and joined the British in three major assaults to attempt capture Krithia, and Achi Baba (28 April; 6-8 May and 4 June): remember this had been planned to be done on first day: April 25th In addition to the above listed causes of failure could be added: inadequate artillery and disease accounting for 50% of casualties.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'There's a Lot of People Who Say They Were at Rorke's Drift'
    ‘There’s A Lot of People Who Say They Were At Rorke’s Drift’ The problems which beset those trying to compile a definitive list of defenders. Ian Knight ___________________________________________________________________________ In his seminal work on the rolls of the 24th Regiment at iSandlwana and Rorke’s Drift, The Noble 24th (Savanah Books, 1999), the late Norman Holme observed ruefully that The defenders of Rorke’s Drift were comparatively few in number, furthermore the garrison mainly consisted of soldiers belonging to one Company of a particular Regiment. On the basis of these facts the accurate identification of the individual men present during the action on 22nd-23rd January 1879 would appear to be a relatively simple task; however, such is not the case. Indeed, it is not - nor, nearly fifteen years after Holme made that remark, and despite the continuing intense interest in the subject, is the task likely to get any easier. The fundamental problem lies with the incompleteness of contemporary records. The only valid sources are the rolls compiled by those who were in a position of authority at the time, and, whilst these agree on the majority of those present, there are contradictions, inaccuracies and omissions between them, and the situation is further complicated because it is impossible to arrive at a definitive conclusion on the question of who ought to have been there. The earliest roll of defenders seems to have been compiled by the senior officer at the action, Lieutenant John Chard of the Royal Engineers. As early as 25 January 1879 - two days after the battle - Chard produced an official report of the battle.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatton – Another Lost Hamlet ………………………
    WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY JOURNAL ________________________________________________ VOL 35 No.1 March 2017 General Roy and the Ordnance Survey markers ISSN 01452-517X WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Joint Presidents: Rob and Bridget Purr Executive Committee Chairman Kirsty Gray 3 Wintergreen, Calne, Wiltshire, SN11 0RS [email protected] Vice Chairman Brian Page 121 Shenley Avenue, Ruislip, Middlesex, HA4 6BU Secretary Roland Bostock Flat 8, 167 Park Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0BP [email protected] Treasurer Muriel Sprott 1 Camellia Place, Whitton, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW2 7HZ [email protected] Membership Patricia Candler Secretary 57 The Vale, Feltham, Middlesex, TW14 0JZ [email protected] Bookstall Manager Margaret Cunnew 25 Selkirk Road, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW2 6PS [email protected] Projects Co-ordinator Brian Page Programme Kirsty Gray Co-ordinator [email protected] Society Yvonne Masson Archivist Webmaster Roland Bostock [email protected] Committee Ann Greene Member Post Holders not on the Executive Committee Editor Bridget Purr 8 Sandleford Lane, Greenham, Thatcham, Berkshire, RG19 8XW [email protected] Examiner Vacant Society Website www.west-middlesex-fhs.org.uk Subscriptions All categories: £15 per annum Subscription year 1 January to 31 December If you wish to contact any of the above people, please use the postal or email address shown. In all correspondence please mark your envelope WMFHS in the upper left-hand corner; if a reply is needed, a SAE must be enclosed. Members are asked to note that receipts are only sent by request, if return postage is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Isandlwana and Rorke's Drift Revisited
    We, ‘The children of Isandlwana’: Isandlwana and Rorke’s Drift revisited Themba Mthethwa B.PROC, LLB (NATAL) __________________________________________________________________________________________ One hundred years ago, King Cetshwayo’s people’s army spoke to the invading enemy with their spears at the battle of Isandlwana. It engaged and defeated the pride of the British colonial army – a feat which has gone down in history as one of the most glorious and spectacular achievements in world struggles to resist foreign domination. Faced with the might of the superior army, our heroic warriors knew no fear. They shed rivers of blood to remain free in the land that was undoubtedly theirs. In a war which was deliberately provoked by the enemy, the people’s army gave a clear motive that a time comes in the life of people when there is only one way out – the way of challenging oppression by force and violence In doing so, they added a glorious page to a long history of our people’s heroic resistance to the invasion of the land of their forefathers. Isandlwana has left us with a heritage, whose spirit of no surrender, whose spirit of sacrifice and discipline, inspires and guides our whole nation in the battles to come, a heritage which is a challenge to all of us – the children of Isandlwana. (1) In the heart of Mitchell Street, Darwin, in Australia’s Northern Territory, I came across a British Redcoat, similar to those who fought at Isandlwana. On a closer look, it was a café, called Rorke’s Drift bar/café. He called the patrons to come and enjoy “the best of British hospitality in the heart of Mitchell Street.” Darwin is not only well known for its tropical climate and as a major tourist destination, but is also known for being the only major target of Japanese bombings during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of 119 Infantry Brigade in the Great War with Special Reference To
    The History of 119 Infantry Brigade in the Great War with Special Reference to the Command of Brigadier-General Frank Percy Crozier by Michael Anthony Taylor A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract 119 Brigade, 40th Division, had an unusual origin as a ‘left-over’ brigade of the Welsh Army Corps and was the only completely bantam formation outside 35th Division. This study investigates the formation’s national identity and demonstrates that it was indeed strongly ‘Welsh’ in more than name until 1918. New data on the social background of men and officers is added to that generated by earlier studies. The examination of the brigade’s actions on the Western Front challenges the widely held belief that there was an inherent problem with this and other bantam formations. The original make-up of the brigade is compared with its later forms when new and less efficient units were introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Islanders
    JOURNAL December 35 2010 The Basra Memorial, 2010 Please note that Copyright for any articles contained in this Journal rests with the Authors as shown. Please contact them directly if you wish to use their material. 1 Hello All We come to the end of another interesting year in Great War terms, and as ever, it is remarkable that new information continues to emerge to shed a light upon the efforts and involvement of Channel Islanders. Again and again I ask myself why was this or that piece of information not addressed at the time? They are mentioned later in the Journal, but as an example, the deaths of Sergeant Horace Champion and Sister Elsie Gladstone were, as I recently discovered, featured in Jersey Evening Posts in early-1919, yet neither was referred to in any Roll of Honour. The Occupation is often used as an excuse for forgetting about the Great War, but it does not explain what now seems to be indifference for the period of 20 years before. Well, time to step off the soapbox and to acknowledge the contributors for their excellent articles, material, information and contact, not just for this particular issue of the Journal, but for all of this year’s Journals. If I find that assembling the Journal is difficult at times, it is not through as lack of worthy input on your part, it is because my brain has seized up! My thanks and a Merry Christmas to all, in the hope that 2011 will be a peaceful year. This Month’s Cover We recently received a set of photographs (164 in all) of the Basra Memorial in Iraq provided by a contact with American friends working in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Plaques in Bromley
    Blue Plaques in Bromley Blue Plaques in Bromley..................................................................................1 Alexander Muirhead (1848-1920) ....................................................................2 Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins (1807-1889)...................................................3 Brass Crosby (1725-1793)...............................................................................4 Charles Keeping (1924-1988)..........................................................................5 Enid Blyton (1897-1968) ..................................................................................6 Ewan MacColl (1915-1989) .............................................................................7 Frank Bourne (1855-1945)...............................................................................8 Harold Bride (1890-1956) ................................................................................9 Heddle Nash (1895-1961)..............................................................................10 Little Tich (Harry Relph) (1867-1928).............................................................11 Lord Ted Willis (1918-1992)...........................................................................12 Prince Pyotr (Peter) Alekseyevich Kropotkin (1842-1921) .............................13 Richmal Crompton (1890-1969).....................................................................14 Sir Geraint Evans (1922-1992) ......................................................................15 Sir
    [Show full text]
  • 3178 Supplement to the London Gazette, May 2,1879
    3178 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, MAY 2,1879, Regiment. Names. Acts of Courage for which recommended. 2nd Battalion 24th Private Henry Hook These two men together, one -man working .whilst Regiment the other fought and held the enemy at bay with his bayonet, broke through three more partitions, and were thus enabled to bring eight patients through a small window into the inner line of defence. 2nd Battalion 24th Private .William Jones and In another ward, facing the hill, Private William Regiment Private Robert Jones Jones and Private Robert Jones defended the post to the last, until six out of the seven patients it contained had been removed. The seventh, Sergeant Maxfield, 2nd Battalion 24th Regiment, was delirious from fever. Although they had previously dressed him, they were un- able to induce him to move. When Private Robert Jones returned to endeavour to carry him away, he found him being stabbed by the Zulus as he lay on his bed. 2nd Battalion 24th Corporal William Allen and It was chiefly due to the courageous conduct of Regiment Private Frederick Hitch these men that communication with the hospital was kept up at all. Holding together at all costs a most dangerous post, raked in re- verse by the enemy's fire from the hill, they were both severely wounded, but their de- termined conduct enabled the patients to be withdrawn from the hospital, and when incapaci- tated by their wounds from fighting, they con- tinued, as soon as their wounds had been dressed, to serve out ammunition to their comrades during the night.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012
    PRESS RELEASE Thursday, 15 May 2014 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Documents from the Royal Family's private archive go on display at Windsor Castle A new exhibition and book mark the centenary of the Royal Archives From the title deed of Buckingham Palace to George III's reflections on the loss of America, the Royal Archives contains an unparalleled collection of documents that capture key moments in the history of the British Monarchy. To mark the centenary of the establishment of a permanent home for the Archives in the Round Tower at Windsor Castle, more than 100 documents from the private archive of the Royal Family are published in a new book, Treasures from the Royal Archives, and 25 of the most fascinating items go on display at the Castle from Saturday, 17 May, many for the first time. In the exhibition, and among the documents on display for the first time, is the title deed for Buckingham Palace. Dated 20 April 1763 and bearing George III's wax seal, it records the purchase of Buckingham House from Sir Charles Sheffield for the sum of £28,000 (over £2,000,000 today). Named after its previous owner, the sixth Duke of Buckingham, the property was bought by the King for his wife, Queen Charlotte, to accommodate their growing family – they had 15 children. Often remembered as the monarch who lost the American colonies, George III wrote his personal reflections on Britain's relationship with America following the end of the War of Independence in 1783. The Crown and Government received much public criticism for the manner in which the conflict was handled; however the King's essay takes a surprisingly sanguine approach to the defeat.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Services and Military Medicine During the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879
    Medical Services and Military Medicine during the Anglo-Zulu war of 1879. Part 1. By Dr Andres Traverse ____________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction The Anglo-Zulu war of 1879 coincided with the mid-point of an era signifying important changes in the organisation of medical services and delivery of military medicine. During this period, the desperate need for an improved service within both the British army and naval medical establishments, resulted in an evolution. This began with major reforms in the late 1850s, which continued through a long transition period to the Boer war in 1899 and beyond. The changes commenced with the establishment of improved living conditions in the British army and recognition of the need to elevate the standard and delivery of healthcare to the common soldier. This aimed to ensure a higher average standard of fitness and improve the recovery rate among the sick and wounded, especially during Foreign Service. However, the conflicts in South Africa during the late 1870s would test the limits of the medical services in terms of organisation, manpower, efficiency and improvisation. The military medical service was never an attractive proposition, except to the desperate or adventurous minority and for good reason. The status of medical officers began as generally second class soldiers of position within the military establishment, during the mid-nineteenth century. Eventually, with reforms, the dawn of the twentieth century would herald a new beginning, in terms of the importance and recognition of medical officers within the army and navy. The Ninth Frontier war in South Africa signalled the beginning of relentless conflict, of varying degrees, in the region against different tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Rorkes Drift Free Download
    RORKES DRIFT FREE DOWNLOAD Adrian Greaves | 464 pages | 01 Feb 2004 | Orion Publishing Co | 9780304366415 | English | London, United Kingdom Rorke’s Drift, South Africa: The Complete Guide The fighting now concentrated on the wall of biscuit barrels linking the mission house with the mealie wall. The corner room that John Williams had pulled the two patients into was occupied by Private Hook and another nine patients. Carnage and Culture. Depleted by injuries and fielding only ten men for much of the second half, the English outclassed and outfought the Australians in what quickly became known as the " Rorke's Drift Test ". More Zulus are estimated to have died in this way than in Rorkes Drift, but the executions were hushed up to preserve Rorke's Drift's image as a bloody but clean fight between two forces which saluted the other's courage. However, the force turned out to be the vanguard of Lord Chelmsford 's relief column. Documents have been uncovered which show that Rorke's Drift was the scene of an atrocity - a war crime, in today's language - which Britain covered up. The surviving patients were rescued after soldiers hacked holes in the walls separating the rooms, and dragged them through and into the barricaded yard. The British garrison set to fortifying the mission station. These regiments had not been involved in the battle and looked for a way to join in the success. The Zulus captured some 1, Martini Henry breech loading rifles Rorkes Drift a large amount of ammunition. And the defenders forced back any who did manage to climb over.
    [Show full text]
  • Commemorations & Burials on St Tysilio
    Walk, churchyard of St Tysilio, Menai Bridge – 1 Commemorations & Burials on St Tysilio associated with WWI & WWII This is about those remembered on the headstones of Ynys St Tysilio who had involvement with the Great War of 1914 – 1918 and the Second World War of 1939 - 1945. Some were lost in war; others were civilians who kept the town going, including H Harold Hughes the Architect who designed the Cenotaph. There are many others commemorated on the Cenotaph who are not mentioned here. As always, there are many people to thank: Karl Simpson who had the idea in the first place; Clive Hughes, Anne Pedley and Al Poole, all associated with the RWF, who have been more than generous with help and information; Warren Kovach who adapted the information for the Touch Screen display in Canolfan Thomas Telford, opposite Waitrose. Walk, churchyard of St Tysilio, Menai Bridge – 2 St Tysilio Burials and Commemorations connected with WWI and WWII: There are 8 official Commonwealth War Graves Commission burials here, 7 from the Great War and 1 from WWII, all marked ✿. Others are commemorations and burials for people who contributed to public life. Where there are inconsistencies in date and spelling, I have transcribed faithfully. The title line for each person is the wording on their headstone. Enter through the large gate, walk to the left and follow the unofficial path to the far corner of the churchyard, on your left – in the furthest corner, CWGC slate headstone with RWF badge ✿ 1 - 2785 Private L. Branwood - Royal Welch Fusiliers Leonard James Branwood, Private Royal Welsh Fusiliers – son of Hannah Elizabeth and Leonard James; father worked as a Linesman; accident with a horse caused a broken skull in Training Camp in Cambridgeshire; contracted meningitis; died in hospital, age 17; given a military funeral, younger brother age 9 also in grave, probably died from flu 2785 Private - L.
    [Show full text]
  • Zulu War Victoria Cross Holders Brian Best ______
    Zulu War Victoria Cross Holders Brian Best __________________________________________________________________________________________ The Victoria Cross - the ultimate accolade, Britain’s highest honour for bravery in battle. The award that has an awesome mystique. There is something brooding about the dark bronze of the medal with its dull crimson ribbon that sets it apart from the glittering silver and colourful ribbons of other awards. The medals were awarded for acts performed in terrifying and bloody circumstances; the tunnel vision of spontaneous bravery in saving a helpless comrade; the calculated act because there was no alternative or that the risk is worth taking. There may have been a handful that deliberately sought the highest decoration but, to the great majority, a medal was the last thing to be considered in the mind-numbing heat of battle. After the hero was feted by a grateful nation, the Victoria Cross could bring it’s own problems for its recipient. The qualities that made a man a hero in battle could elude him in times of peace. Of the 1,354 men who have won the VC, 19 committed suicide, far higher than the national average, although almost all were Victorian. About the same number have died in suspect circumstances (see Cecil D’Arcy). Many fell on hard times and died in abject poverty, having sold their hard earned Cross for a pittance. Most officer recipients, in contrast, prospered, as did many other ranks who were held in high esteem by their neighbours. To some men, the Cross changed their lives for the better while others could not come to terms with it’s constant reminder of nightmarish events.
    [Show full text]