Australian Federal Constitutional

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Australian Federal Constitutional LAWBOOK CO. CASEBOOK WINTERTON’S AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW COMMENTARY AND MATERIALS THIRD EDITION PETER GERANGELOS (General Editor) HP LEE • NICHOLAS ARONEY • SARAH MURRAY • SIMON EVANS • PATRICK EMERTON BIBLIOGRAPHY TO THE THIRD EDITION Lawbook Co. Winterton’s Australian Federal Constitutional Law: Commentary and Materials, Third Edition Select Bibliography [APP.10] CASEBOOKS ............................................................................................................... 2 [APP.20] REFERENCE BOOKS ................................................................................................... 2 [APP.20] Annotations of Commonwealth Constitution ...................................... 2 [APP.30] Historical Background ............................................................................. 2 [APP.60] Constitutional Reform Proposals: Official Publications ...................... 12 [APP.70] Bibliographies ........................................................................................ 13 [APP.80] High Court ............................................................................................. 14 [APP.90] Justices .................................................................................................... 18 [APP.480] CHAPTER 1: CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTALS .............................................. 30 [APP.490] CHAPTER 2: PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY AND STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ........................................................................................................................... 38 [APP.500] CHAPTER 3: THE EXECUTIVE .................................................................................. 41 [APP.510] CHAPTER 4: INCONSISTENCY ............................................................................... 46 [APP.520] CHAPTER 5: COMMERCE AND CORPORATIONS ................................................. 46 [APP.520] Commerce Power ................................................................................. 46 [APP.530] Corporations Power .............................................................................. 47 [APP.540] CHAPTER 6: EXTERNAL AFFAIRS AND DEFENCE ................................................... 49 [APP.540] External Affairs Power ........................................................................... 49 [APP.550] Defence Power ...................................................................................... 53 [APP.560] CHAPTER 7: COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL POWERS ........................................ 54 [APP.560] Taxation ................................................................................................. 54 [APP.570] Grants ..................................................................................................... 54 [APP.580] Appropriation ........................................................................................ 57 [APP.590] CHAPTER 8: FREEDOM OF INTERSTATE TRADE AND COMMERCE .................... 57 [APP.600] CHAPTER 9: EXCISE DUTIES ................................................................................... 59 [APP.610] CHAPTER 10: EXPRESS RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS ................................................ 61 [APP.610] General ................................................................................................... 61 [APP.620] Acquisition of Property ......................................................................... 64 [APP.630] Right of State Electors ........................................................................... 64 [APP.640] Trial by jury ............................................................................................ 64 [APP.650] Religion .................................................................................................. 65 [APP.660] Rights of Residents ................................................................................ 66 [APP.670] CHAPTER 11: IMPLIED RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS ............................................... 66 1 Winterton’s Australian Federal Constitutional Law [APP.680] CHAPTER 12: INTERGOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITIES ............................................ 72 [APP.690] CHAPTER 13: THE SEPARATION OF JUDICIAL POWER ......................................... 74 [APP.700] CHAPTER 14: CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION ............................................ 77 [APP.710] INTERNET CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SITES ............................................................. 85 [APP.710] Australia .................................................................................................. 85 [APP.720] National Constitutions .......................................................................... 86 [APP.730] United States ......................................................................................... 86 CASEBOOKS [APP.10] Blackshield T and Williams G, Australian Constitutional Law and Theory: Commentary and Materials, 5th ed, Federation Press, Sydney, 2010. Howard C and Saunders C, Cases and Materials on Constitutional Law, Law Book Co, Sydney, 1979. Keyzer P, Clarke J and Stellios J, Hanks’ Australian Constitutional Law: Materials and Commentary, 9th ed, Lexis Nexis Butterworths, Sydney, 2012. Lane P, A Digest of Australian Constitutional Cases, 5th ed, LBC Information Services, Sydney, 1996. Ratnapala S, John T, Karean V and Koch C, Australian Constitutional Law: Commentary and Cases, Oxford UP, Melbourne, 2006. Zines L and Lindell G, Sawer’s Australian Constitutional Cases, 4th ed, Law Book Co, Sydney, 1982. REFERENCE BOOKS Annotations of Commonwealth Constitution [APP.20] Attorney-General’s Department, The Australian Constitution Annotated, AGPS, Canberra, 1980 (1976-1979 Cumulative Supplement, AGPS, Canberra, 1980). Australian Government Solicitor, Australia’s Constitution: With Overview and Notes by the Australian Government Solicitor, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 2010. Lane PH, Lane’s Commentary on the Australian Constitution, 2nd ed, Law Book Co, Sydney, 1997 (First Supplement, 1999). Lane PH, The Australian Federal System with United States Analogues, Law Book Co, Sydney, 1972. Moens G and Trone J, Lumb, Moens and Trone The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia: Annotated, 8th ed, LexisNexis Butterworths, Sydney, 2011. Quick J and Garran RR, The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth, Angus & Robertson, Sydney, 1901 (reprinted by Legal Books, Sydney, 1976, 1995). Saunders C, The Australian Constitution (Annotated), Constitution Centenary Foundation, Melbourne, 2000. Historical Background [APP.30] Anderson H (ed), Tocsin: Radical Arguments Against Federation, Drummond, Melbourne, 1977. 2 [APP.10] Select Bibliography Aroney N, “A Commonwealth of Commonwealths: Late Nineteenth-Century Conceptions of Federalism and their Impact on Australian Federation, 1890-1901” (2002) 23(3) Journal of Legal History 253. Aroney N, “Imagining a Federal Commonwealth: Australian Conceptions of Federalism, 1890-1901” (2002) 30 Federal Law Review 265. Aroney N, The Constitution of a Federal Commonwealth: The Making and Meaning of the Australian Constitution, Cambridge UP, Cambridge, 2009. Aveling M, A History of the Australian Natives Association 1871-1900, PhD thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, 1970. Bannon J, The Crucial Colony: South Australia’s Role in Reviving Federation 1891 to 1897, Federalism Research Centre, Canberra, 1994. Barton GB, Notes on Australian Federation and the Draft Constitution Bills Framed by the Conventions of 1891 and 1897, Government Printer, Sydney, 1897. Bastin J, The West Australian Federation Movement, MA thesis, Department of History, University of Melbourne, 1951. Bennett S (ed), Federation, Cassell Australia, Melbourne, 1975. Bennett S (ed), The Making of the Commonwealth, Cassell Australia, Melbourne, 1971. Bennett SC, Annotated Documents on the Making of the Commonwealth of Australia,MA thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, 1967. Brazil P and Mitchell B (eds), Opinions of Attorneys-General of the Commonwealth of Australia with Opinions of Solicitors-General and the Attorney-General’s Department: Volume 1: 1901–14, Volume 2: 1914-23, AGPS, Canberra, 1981 and 1988. Clark D, “Kingston’s Draft Constitution for a United Australia” (2004) 7 Constitutional Law & Policy Review 1. Craig DJ, The Federal Movement in Tasmania 1880–1900, MA thesis, Department of History, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 31 December 1971. Crisp LF, Australian National Government, 5th ed, Longman Cheshire, Melbourne, 1983, pp 1–39 (“The Fathers and their Constitution”). Crisp LF and Hart J (ed), Federation Fathers, Melbourne UP, Melbourne, 1990. de Garis BK, British Influence on the Federation of the Australian Colonies, 1880–1901,D Phil thesis, Oxford University, December 1965. Department of the Senate, The Constitution Makers, 30 Papers on Parliament, Canberra, 1997. Eastman D, The Founding Documents of Australia, Privately Printed, Canberra, 1995. Ely R, A Living Force: Andrew Inglis Clark and the Ideal of the Commonwealth, Centre for Tasmanian Historical Studies, Hobart, 2001. Ely R, “Andrew Inglis Clark on the Preamble of the Australian Constitution” (2001) 75 Australian Law Journal 36. Evans R, Moore C, Saunders K and Jamison B, 1901 – Our Future’s Past, Pan Macmillan, Sydney, 1997. Foster SG, Marsden S and Russell R, Federation: The Guide to the Records, Australian Archives, Canberra, 1998. Gambling J, Aspects of the South Australian Referenda on the Commonwealth Bill,BA (Hons) thesis, University of Adelaide, 1957. Garran RR,
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Negative Implications in the Interpretation of Commonwealth Legislative Powers
    THE ROLE OF NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF COMMONWEALTH LEGISLATIVE POWERS MICHAEL STOKES* One of the bases for the view that Commonwealth powers should be interpreted broadly is the idea that it is wrong to draw negative implications from positive grants of power. The paper argues that far from being wrong to draw negative implications from positive grants of power it is necessary to do so in that it is impossible to interpret such grants sensibly without drawing negative implications from them. This paper considers Isaacs J’s argument in Huddart Parker that it is wrong to draw negative implications from positive grants of power, as it is the most detailed defence of that position, and the adoption of similar arguments in Work Choices. It then considers the merits of Isaacs J’s argument, rejecting it because it is impossible to interpret positive grants of power without drawing negative implications from them in any context and in the Australian constitutional context in particular. This paper looks at how the scope of such implications is to be determined and how constitutional grants of power ought to be interpreted in the light of negative implications. It concludes that it is possible to determine the scope of the negative implications implicit in the s 51 grants of power and to interpret those powers in the light of the implications while accepting that state powers are residual and that their content cannot be determined until the content of all Commonwealth powers is known. CONTENTS I Introduction .............................................................................................................. 176 II The Origin of the Argument That It Is Wrong to Draw Negative Implications from Positive Grants of Power .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Academy of the Humanities
    Australian Academy of the Humanities AUSTRALIAN ACADEMY OF THE HUMANITIES ANNUAL REPORT 2017–18 annual report 2017–18 AUSTRALIAN ACADEMY OF THE HUMANITIES ANNUAL REPORT 2017–18 This document is a true and accurate account of the activities and abridged financial report of the Australian Academy of the Humanities for the financial year 2017–18, in accordance with the reporting requirements of the Academy’s Royal Charter and By-laws, and for the conditions of grants made by the Australian Government under the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (Cth). CONTENTS The Year at a Glance iv Publications and Communications 17 From the President vi Grants and Awards 18 From the Executive Director viii International Activities 21 Governance 1 Obituaries 23 The Fellowship 3 Treasurer’s Statement 46 Policy and Research 9 Abridged Financial Statements 47 Events 12 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for the production of this report and a number of the activities described herein has been provided by the Australian Government through the Department of Education and Training. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Education and Training. The photographs and certain identified inclusions in the text are held under separate copyright and may not be reproduced in any form without the permission of the respective copyright holders. Every reasonable effort has been made to contact relevant copyright holders for illustrative material in this report. Where this has not proved possible, the copyright holders are
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving Individual Labour Disputes: a Comparative Overview
    Resolving Individual Labour Disputes A comparative overview Edited by Minawa Ebisui Sean Cooney Colin Fenwick Resolving individual labour disputes Resolving individual labour disputes: A comparative overview Edited by Minawa Ebisui, Sean Cooney and Colin Fenwick International Labour Office, Geneva Copyright © International Labour Organization 2016 First published 2016 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. Ebisui, Minawa; Cooney, Sean; Fenwick, Colin F. Resolving individual labour disputes: a comparative overview / edited by Minawa Ebisui, Sean Cooney, Colin Fenwick ; International Labour Office. - Geneva: ILO, 2016. ISBN 978-92-2-130419-7 (print) ISBN 978-92-2-130420-3 (web pdf ) International Labour Office. labour dispute / labour dispute settlement / labour relations 13.06.6 ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of the Federal Political Career of Andrew Fisher
    SOME ASPECTS OF THE FEDERAL POLITICAL CAREER OF ANDREW FISHER By EDWARD WIL.LIAM I-IUMPHREYS, B.A. Hans. MASTER OF ARTS Department of History I Faculty of Arts, The University of Melbourne Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degr'ee of Masters of Arts (by Thesis only) JulV 2005 ABSTRACT Andrew Fisher was prime minister of Australia three times. During his second ministry (1910-1913) he headed a government that was, until the 1940s, Australia's most reformist government. Fisher's second government controlled both Houses; it was the first effective Labor administration in the history of the Commonwealth. In the three years, 113 Acts were placed on the statute books changing the future pattern of the Commonwealth. Despite the volume of legislation and changes in the political life of Australia during his ministry, there is no definitive full-scale biographical published work on Andrew Fisher. There are only limited articles upon his federal political career. Until the 1960s most historians considered Fisher a bit-player, a second ranker whose main quality was his moderating influence upon the Caucus and Labor ministry. Few historians have discussed Fisher's role in the Dreadnought scare of 1909, nor the background to his attempts to change the Constitution in order to correct the considered deficiencies in the original drafting. This thesis will attempt to redress these omissions from historical scholarship Firstly, it investigates Fisher's reaction to the Dreadnought scare in 1909 and the reasons for his refusal to agree to the financing of the Australian navy by overseas borrowing.
    [Show full text]
  • WD Scott and Co Pty Ltd the Judicial Role
    341 ---------,-------SEMINARSE~nNl\R ON 01DIRECTIONS RECTIONS IN PUDLIC POLICY WEN1'WOg:ri~ .'!!'C;TEL,_'!!'C;TEL, SYDNEY, FRIDAY, 25 JUNE 1982 THE JUDICIAI.JillLL ADMINISTRATIyEADMINISTRATIVE REFORM,REFORM. THE CQU[(Ulli1lCOUlill.JlliD. GOING TOO FAR? The Bon. Mr. Justice M. D. Kirby Chairman of the Australian Law Reform Commission June 1982 . -~-~"------~-~"-----------.._------------- W.D. SCOTT AND CO., PTY LIMITED MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS SEMINAR ON DIRECTIONS IN PUBLIC POLICY WENTWORTH HOTEL, SYDNEY, FRIDAY, 25 JUNE 1982 THE JUDICIAL ROLE, ADMINISTRATIVEADMlNISTRATIVE REFORM, THE COURTS AND GOING TOO FAR? The Hon Mr Justice M.D. Kirby Chairman of the Australian Law Reform Commission CHRISTIAN VIRTUES, THE JUDICIARY AND RETIREMENT This is a time of change in the jUdiciary.judiciary. Sir NinjanNinian Stephen, a High Court Judge,JUdge, has become Governor-General Designate. Sir Keith Aickin, a Judge of the High Court of Australia for only six years died last week. Two vacancies remain to be filled on our highest court. Judges are retiring early. A New Zealand ju'dge, Mr Justice Speight retired last month after 15 years on the bench of the SU[H'eme Court, now called the High Court of New Zealand. He is aged 60 years but he had a potential of 12 further years ahead on him in th? judicial harness. In New Zealand judges retire at 72. In Australia (save for Victoria) they retire, generaUy, at 70. Mr Justice Speight· explained '1 just feel I have had enough'. Those of you who read the pape['"spapers earlier in the week will have seen that jUdgesjudges emerged once again as number one in the Australian social status of occupations, according to an opinion poll.
    [Show full text]
  • Right to Freedom of Association in the Workplace: Australia's Compliance with International Human Rights Law
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title The Right to Freedom of Association in the Workplace: Australia's Compliance with International Human Rights Law Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/98v0c0jj Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 27(2) Author Hutchinson, Zoé Publication Date 2010 DOI 10.5070/P8272022218 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ARTICLES THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: AUSTRALIA'S COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW Zoe Hutchinson BA LLB (Hons, 1st Class)* ABSTRACT The right to freedom of association in the workplace is a well- established norm of internationalhuman rights law. However, it has traditionally received insubstantial attention within human rights scholarship. This article situates the right to freedom of as- sociation at work within human rights discourses. It looks at the status, scope and importance of the right as it has evolved in inter- nationalhuman rights law. In so doing, a case is put that there are strong reasons for states to comply with the right to freedom of association not only in terms of internationalhuman rights obliga- tions but also from the perspective of human dignity in the context of an interconnected world. A detailed case study is offered that examines the right to free- dom of association in the Australian context. There has been a series of significant changes to Australian labor law in recent years. The Rudd-Gillard Labor government claimed that recent changes were to bring Australia into greater compliance with its obligations under internationallaw. This policy was presented to electors as in sharp contrast to the Work Choices legislation of the Howard Liberal-Nationalparty coalitiongovernment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Expediency Queensland
    THE POLITICS OF EXPEDIENCY QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT IN THE EIGHTEEN-NINETIES by Jacqueline Mc0ormack University of Queensland, 197^1. Presented In fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts to the Department of History, University of Queensland. TABLE OP, CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION SECTION ONE; THE SUBSTANCE OP POLITICS CHAPTER 1. The Men of Politics 1 CHAPTER 2. Politics in the Eighties 21 CHAPTER 3. The Depression 62 CHAPTER 4. Railways 86 CHAPTER 5. Land, Labour & Immigration 102 CHAPTER 6 Separation and Federation 132 CHAPTER 7 The Queensland.National Bank 163 SECTION TWO: THE POLITICS OP REALIGNMENT CHAPTER 8. The General Election of 1888 182 CHAPTER 9. The Coalition of 1890 204 CHAPTER 10. Party Organization 224 CHAPTER 11. The Retreat of Liberalism 239 CHAPTER 12. The 1893 Election 263 SECTION THREE: THE POLITICS.OF EXPEDIENCY CHAPTER 13. The First Nelson Government 283 CHAPTER Ik. The General Election of I896 310 CHAPTER 15. For Want of an Opposition 350 CHAPTER 16. The 1899 Election 350 CHAPTER 17. The Morgan-Browne Coalition 362 CONCLUSION 389 APPENDICES 394 BIBLIOGRAPHY 422 PREFACE The "Nifi^ties" Ms always" exercised a fascination for Australian historians. The decade saw a flowering of Australian literature. It saw tremendous social and economic changes. Partly as a result of these changes, these years saw the rise of a new force in Australian politics - the labour movement. In some colonies, this development was overshadowed by the consolidation of a colonial liberal tradition reaching its culmination in the Deakinite liberalism of the early years of the tlommdhwealth. Developments in Queensland differed from those in the southern colonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Law Note
    CONSTITUTIONAL LAW NOTE Topic 1, 2 – The Structure of Parliament and Legislative Procedures o The Structure .......................................................................................................... 3 o Duration and Membership ..................................................................................... 5 o Standard Legislative Procedures: Commonwealth and States ............................... 8 o Commonwealth Alternative Procedures (section 57) ............................................ 10 o Commonwealth Restrictive Procedures (section 128) .......................................... 13 o Special Procedures for Financial Legislation (section 53, 54, 55) ........................ 15 o State Restrictive Procedures .................................................................................. 19 Topic 3 – Characterisation and Interpretation o Principles of Constitutional Interpretation ............................................................. 25 o The Process of Characterisation ............................................................................. 28 Topic 4 – Financial and Economic Powers o Taxation Power – section 51(ii) ............................................................................. 33 o Grants Power – section 96 ..................................................................................... 36 o Appropriation Power – section 81 ......................................................................... 38 o Corporations Power – section 51(xx) ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 the Return of the Repressed
    Chapter 15 The Return of the Repressed XTINCTION in philosophy is not forever. Any opinion or argument, no matter how finally it seems to have been hunted Edown and refuted into oblivion, has the chance of being redis- covered by a new generation eager for novelties. In this chapter, we examine the revival of two old philosophies once thought well off the agenda: idealism and Catholic natural law philosophy. They have not been seen much in philosophy departments, but have flourished in, respectively, literature departments and the High Court of Australia. As we saw in chapter 6, David Stove wrote that idealism, the doc- trine that everything is mind-dependent, was sustained by what he identified as the ‘Worst argument in the world’: We can know things only as they are related to us/under our forms of perception and un- derstanding/in so far as they fall under our conceptual schemes, etc, so, we cannot know things as they are in themselves. In Berkeley’s version, ‘we cannot have trees-outside-the-mind in mind without them being in mind, so there cannot be trees outside the mind (or if there could be, they could not be thought of). That argument did not vanish with the 1890s. We saw in chapter 11 that John Burnheim adopted an ‘inevitably partisan’ reading of the Sydney disturbances on the grounds that philosophy ‘rests not on ultimate truths, but on a reading of our specific historical situation’ (that is, we cannot know things except through our specific historical situation, therefore we cannot know things as they are in themselves).
    [Show full text]
  • Who's That with Abrahams
    barTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSWnews BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2008/09 Who’s that with Abrahams KC? Rediscovering Rhetoric Justice Richard O’Connor rediscovered Bullfry in Shanghai | CONTENTS | 2 President’s column 6 Editor’s note 7 Letters to the editor 8 Opinion Access to court information The costs circus 12 Recent developments 24 Features 75 Legal history The Hon Justice Foster The criminal jurisdiction of the Federal The Kyeema air disaster The Hon Justice Macfarlan Court NSW Law Almanacs online The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina The Hon Justice Ward Saving St James Church 40 Addresses His Honour Judge Michael King SC Justice Richard Edward O’Connor Rediscovering Rhetoric 104 Personalia The current state of the profession His Honour Judge Storkey VC 106 Obituaries Refl ections on the Federal Court 90 Crossword by Rapunzel Matthew Bracks 55 Practice 91 Retirements 107 Book reviews The Keble Advocacy Course 95 Appointments 113 Muse Before the duty judge in Equity Chief Justice French Calderbank offers The Hon Justice Nye Perram Bullfry in Shanghai Appearing in the Commercial List The Hon Justice Jagot 115 Bar sports barTHE JOURNAL OF THE NSWnews BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2008-09 Bar News Editorial Committee Cover the New South Wales Bar Andrew Bell SC (editor) Leonard Abrahams KC and Clark Gable. Association. Keith Chapple SC Photo: Courtesy of Anthony Abrahams. Contributions are welcome and Gregory Nell SC should be addressed to the editor, Design and production Arthur Moses SC Andrew Bell SC Jeremy Stoljar SC Weavers Design Group Eleventh Floor Chris O’Donnell www.weavers.com.au Wentworth Chambers Duncan Graham Carol Webster Advertising 180 Phillip Street, Richard Beasley To advertise in Bar News visit Sydney 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Australian Labour Law
    Ul/d"I',"I"'''/iIlK Austruliun Labour '''</\1' '27 Understanding Australian Labour Law Kerl Spooner University of Technology, Sydney TIll' purpose of II';.~paper is 10 provide an (}\'erl'iew ofthe legaljramework with in which employmetu ronditions are established in Australia. Comparative studies in lirefield of employment relations can promote understanding ofthe factors and processes that determine such phenomena and ('(III genera te a better understanding I!f our own country's institutions and practices. 71,1' need/ill" such understanding is becoming more urgent in the context (!{ globalisatio« lind the quest for some understanding of what might be deemed as socially responsible employment conditions. However, comparative international employment relation '.I' StII{~Valso presents particular chollenges, as there are international differences ill terminology as 11'1'/1 as problems in distinguishing between the loll' and actual practice. This paper aims lit assisting the development ofcomparative empkrytnen! relations studv by providing 0 detailed but simplified examination o] Australian labourIaw which mightform the basesforfuture comparative studv. Introduction Governments of all political persuasions in all industrial and industriajising countries pass laws establishing the framework within which employment relations institutions and processes are determined. The rights of individuals in employment flow either directly from legal standards established by government 01' from thlf operations of institutions and processes provided under the law. The forces of globalisation have a siglfificanl impact upon employment conditions and have increased the need for understanding of labour law at internauonal and naiional levels. There is considerable and growing pressure for multi- national organisations operating in countries offering cheap labour to provide employment conditions that are socially responsible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Idea of a Federal Commonwealth
    Chapter One Th e Idea of a Federal Commonwealth* Dr Nicholas Aroney Arguably the single most important provision in the entire body of Australian constitutional law is s. 3 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK). Th is section authorised Queen Victoria to declare by proclamation that the people of the several Australian colonies should be united in a Federal Commonwealth under the name of the Commonwealth of Australia. Several things are at once noticeable about this provision. Of primary importance for present purposes is that, while the formation of the Commonwealth depended upon an enactment by the Imperial Parliament at Westminster and a proclamation by the Queen, the Australian Commonwealth was itself premised upon the agreement of the people of the several colonies of Australia to be united into a federal commonwealth. Th e framers of the Constitution could arguably have used any one of a number of terms to describe the nature of the political entity that they wished to see established. Th e federation was established subject to the Crown and under a Constitution, so they might have called it the Dominion of Australia and describeddescribed it as a constitutional monarchy. Th e Constitution was arguably the most democratic and liberal that the world had yet seen, so perhaps they could have called it the United States of Australia and describeddescribed it as a liberal democracy. But to conjecture in this way is to hazard anachronism. Th e framers of the Constitution chose to name it the Commonwealth of Australia and toto describedescribe it as a federal commonwealth.
    [Show full text]