• -. • ' ' - R the Patina, the Bible, the .Chalice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

• -. • ' ' - R the Patina, the Bible, the .Chalice

SUPPLEMENT TQ THE LONDON GAZETTE;OCTOBER^,' 19&2.' , 637T The Lord Mayor of London, Deputy Garter King of Gentleman Usher of.the in his Robe, Collar Arms, in his Tabard and Black Rod, - - and Jewel, Collar, carrying his Crown. Gen. • Si-r Michael Biddiilph, bearing the City Mace, and Sceptre, G.C.B. Rt. Hon. William H. Weldon, Esq. Sir Joseph C. Dimsdale, Bart. ' . ' ' The Lord Great Chamberlain of England, Marquess of Cholmondeley (P.O.), his Coronet carried by his Page, Lord George Hugo Cholmondeley. - -- . • . 1 The High Constable of Ireland, The High Constable of Scotland, the Duke of Abercorn, K.G., C.B. (P.O.); Earl of Errolj, K.T.; C.B.; " ' his Coronet -carried by his Page, his Coronet carried by his Page, • Geoffrey Lambton, Esq. Christian Seymour H. Combe, Esq. The Lord High Steward of Ireland, The Lord High Steward of .Scotland, . Earl of Shrewsbury, Earl of Crawford, K.T., as Deputy to His with his White Staff; Royal Highness The Duke of Rothesay his Coronet carried by his Page, (the Prince of Wales);; :.; Gilbert Talbot, Esq. his Coronet carried by his-Page, G. Humphrey Lindsay, Esq. The Earl Marshal of England, The Sword of State, The Lord High.Constable of : the Duke of Norfolk, borne by the England, KG., K.C.V.O. (P.C.), Marquess of Londonderry, the Duke of Fife, ' . with his Baton, K.G. (P.O.); • K.T., G.C.V.O. (P.O.), attended by his two Pages, his Coronet carried by with his Staff, : Henry Stewart, and his Page, attended by his two Pages, Lyulph Howard, Esquires. Wentworth Beaumont, Esq. Eric Mackenzie, and Angus Cuningham-Graham, Esquires. • -• ;•-" '-* The Sceptre with the Dove, St. Edward's Crown, .: The-Orb,. borne by the borne by the . , borne by the'.; ^ Earl of Lucan, K.P. ; DukeofMarlborough,K.G.(P.G), Duke of Somerset; his Coronet carried by Lord High Steward, his Coronet carried by his Page, attended by his two Pages, his Page, David Bingham, Esq. Hon. Rupert Anson, 'and Harold Sargent, Esq; .- Ernald Anscn, Esq. • -. • ' ' - r The Patina, The Bible, The .Chalice, . ' /- borne by the Bishop of borne by the Bishop of borne by the Bishop of Ely, D.D. London, D.D. (P.O.) ~ Winchester, D.D. ' ' THE KING tT< The Bishop in His Royal Crimson The Bishop i—'« of Robe of .State, of . CD «-t--' Bath and Wells, D.D. wearing the Collar Durham, D.D. CD .j. of the Garter, H on His Head the Cap CD of State, Q His Majesty's Train CD borne by a 1 Earl of Portarlington. Marquess Conyrgham. CD 3 Duke of Leinster. Earl of Caledon. hH P MH (D CD Lord Vernon. Lord Somers. • «rf- CD PP O H. E. Festinge, Esq. Hon. V. A. Spencer. .p assisted by Lord Suffield, G.C.V.O., K.C.B! (P.O.), O the Master of the Robes, £ • his Coronet carried by his Page, P CO Hon. C. T. Mills; . and followed by the Groom of the Robes* H. D. Krskine, Esq., C.V.O. - • -.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Catalogue of the Earl Marshal's Papers at Arundel
CONTENTS CONTENTS v FOREWORD by Sir Anthony Wagner, K.C.V.O., Garter King of Arms vii PREFACE ix LIST OF REFERENCES xi NUMERICAL KEY xiii COURT OF CHIVALRY Dated Cases 1 Undated Cases 26 Extracts from, or copies of, records relating to the Court; miscellaneous records concerning the Court or its officers 40 EARL MARSHAL Office and Jurisdiction 41 Precedence 48 Deputies 50 Dispute between Thomas, 8th Duke of Norfolk and Henry, Earl of Berkshire, 1719-1725/6 52 Secretaries and Clerks 54 COLLEGE OF ARMS General Administration 55 Commissions, appointments, promotions, suspensions, and deaths of Officers of Arms; applications for appointments as Officers of Arms; lists of Officers; miscellanea relating to Officers of Arms 62 Office of Garter King of Arms 69 Officers of Arms Extraordinary 74 Behaviour of Officers of Arms 75 Insignia and dress 81 Fees 83 Irregularities contrary to the rules of honour and arms 88 ACCESSIONS AND CORONATIONS Coronation of King James II 90 Coronation of King George III 90 Coronation of King George IV 90 Coronation of Queen Victoria 90 Coronation of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra 90 Accession and Coronation of King George V and Queen Mary 96 Royal Accession and Coronation Oaths 97 Court of Claims 99 FUNERALS General 102 King George II 102 Augusta, Dowager Princess of Wales 102 King George III 102 King William IV 102 William Ewart Gladstone 103 Queen Victoria 103 King Edward VII 104 CEREMONIAL Precedence 106 Court Ceremonial; regulations; appointments; foreign titles and decorations 107 Opening of Parliament
[Show full text]
Lord Henry Howard, Later 6Th Duke of Norfolk (1628 – 1684)
THE WEISS GALLERY www.weissgallery.com 59 JERMYN STREET [email protected] LONDON, SW1Y 6LX +44(0)207 409 0035 John Michael Wright (1617 – 1694) Lord Henry Howard, later 6th Duke of Norfolk (1628 – 1684) Oil on canvas: 52 ¾ × 41 ½ in. (133.9 × 105.4 cm.) Painted c.1660 Provenance By descent to Reginald J. Richard Arundel (1931 – 2016), 10th Baron Talbot of Malahide, Wardour Castle; by whom sold, Christie’s London, 8 June 1995, lot 2; with The Weiss Gallery, 1995; Private collection, USA, until 2019. Literature E. Waterhouse, Painting in Britain 1530 – 1790, London 1953, p.72, plate 66b. G. Wilson, ‘Greenwich Armour in the Portraits of John Michael Wright’, The Connoisseur, Feb. 1975, pp.111–114 (illus.). D. Howarth, ‘Questing and Flexible. John Michael Wright: The King’s Painter.’ Country Life, 9 September 1982, p.773 (illus.4). The Weiss Gallery, Tudor and Stuart Portraits 1530 – 1660, 1995, no.25. Exhibited Edinburgh, Scottish National Portrait Gallery, John Michael Wright – The King’s Painter, 16 July – 19 September 1982, exh. cat. pp.42 & 70, no.15 (illus.). This portrait by Wright is such a compelling amalgam of forceful assurance and sympathetic sensitivity, that is easy to see why that doyen of British art historians, Sir Ellis Waterhouse, described it in these terms: ‘The pattern is original and the whole conception of the portrait has a quality of nobility to which Lely never attained.’1 Painted around 1660, it is the prime original of which several other studio replicas are recorded,2 and it is one of a number of portraits of sitters in similar ceremonial 1 Ellis Waterhouse, Painting in Britain 1530 to 1790, 4th integrated edition, 1978, p.108.
[Show full text]
Introduction to the Abercorn Papers Adobe
INTRODUCTION ABERCORN PAPERS November 2007 Abercorn Papers (D623) Table of Contents Summary ......................................................................................................................2 Family history................................................................................................................3 Title deeds and leases..................................................................................................5 Irish estate papers ........................................................................................................8 Irish estate and related correspondence.....................................................................11 Scottish papers (other than title deeds) ......................................................................14 English estate papers (other than title deeds).............................................................17 Miscellaneous, mainly seventeenth-century, family papers ........................................19 Correspondence and papers of the 6th Earl of Abercorn............................................20 Correspondence and papers of the Hon. Charles Hamilton........................................21 Papers and correspondence of Capt. the Hon. John Hamilton, R.N., his widow and their son, John James, the future 1st Marquess of Abercorn....................22 Political correspondence of the 1st Marquess of Abercorn.........................................23 Political and personal correspondence of the 1st Duke of Abercorn...........................26
[Show full text]
Imagereal Capture
113 The Law of Arms in New Zealand: A Response Gregor Macaulay* :Noel Cox has written that "Ifany laws of arms were inherited by New Zealand, it 'was the Law of Arms of England, in 1840",1 and that in England and l'Jew Zealand today "the Law of Arms is the same in each jurisdiction",2 The statements cannot both be true; each is individually mistaken; and the English la~N of arms is in any case unworkable in New Zealand. In England, the laws of arms may be defined as the law governing "the use of anms, crests, supporters and other armorial insignia [which] is to be found in the customs and usages of the [English] Court ofChivalry",3 "augmented either by rulings of the [English] kings of arms or by warrants from the Earl Marshal [of England]".4 There are several standard reference books in English heraldry, but not even one revised and edited by a herald may, in his own words, be considered "authoritative in any official sense",5 and a definitive volume detailing the law of arms of England has never been published. A basic difficulty exists, therefore, in knowing precisely what the content of the law is that is being discussed. Even in England there are some extraordinary lacunae. For instance, the English heralds seem not to know who may legally inherit heraldic badges.6 If the English law of arms of 1840 had been inherited by New Zealand it would have come within the ambit of the English Laws Act 1858 (succeeded by the English Laws Act 1908).
[Show full text]
2224 Supplement to the London Gazette, March 17, 1879
2224 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, MARCH 17, 1879. Third Carriage. His Royal Highness The Prince Albert Victor of Wales. Her Royal Highness The Princess Beatrice. THE QUEEN. The Clerk Marshal, the Equerries, the Groom, the Maids of Honour, and the Woman of the Bedchamber in Waiting, and the Groom of the Robes, met The Queen at the Chapel. On arrival at the West Entrance, The Queen was received by the Great Officers, and conducted to the Haut Pas by The Lord Chamberlain, Her Majesty's Procession being formed in the following order:— Heralds. York, Lancaster, Mr. John de Havilland. Mr. George E. Cokayne. Clerk Marshal, Lieutenaut-General The Lord Alfred Paget. Equerry in Waiting, Equeny in Waiting, Colonel ' Major-General The Honourable H. W. J. Byhg. The Lord Charles Fitzroy, C.B. Comptroller of the Household, Treasurer of the Household, The Earl of Yarmouth. The Lord Henry Thynne. Keeper of Her Majesty's Privy Purse, Lieutenant-General Sir H. F. Ponsonby, K.C.B. The Groom in Waiting, The Lord in Waiting, . Major C. E. Phipps. The Viscount Hawardeii. The Gentleman Usher in Garter. The Gentleman Usher in Waiting, Sir Albert Woods. Waiting, Mr. Alpin Macgregor. Mr. Con way Seymour. The Vice-Chamberlain, The Viscount Barrington. The Lord Chamberlain, The Lord Steward, The Marquis of Hertford, G.C.B. The Earl Beauchamp. THE QUEEN, . Her Majesty's Train borne by The Groom of the Robes, Mr. H. D. Erskine of Car dross, and ' Two Pages of Honour, Honourable V. A. Spencer. Count A. E. Gleichen. Her Royal Highness His Royal Highness THE PRINCESS BEATRICE.
[Show full text]
PLEASE NOTE This Is a Draft Paper Only and Should Not Be Cited Without
PLEASE NOTE This is a draft paper only and should not be cited without the author’s express permission THE SHORT-TERM IMPACT OF THE >GLORIOUS REVOLUTION= ON THE ENGLISH JUDICIAL SYSTEM On February 14, 1689, The day after William and Mary were recognized by the Convention Parliament as King and Queen, the first members of their Privy Council were sworn in. And, during the following two to three weeks, all of the various high offices in the government and the royal household were filled. Most of the politically powerful posts went either to tories or to moderates. The tory Earl of Danby was made Lord President of the Council and another tory, the Earl of Nottingham was made Secretary of State for the Southern Department. The office of Lord Privy Seal was given to the Atrimming@ Marquess of Halifax, whom dedicated whigs had still not forgiven for his part in bringing about the disastrous defeat of the exclusion bill in the Lords= house eight years earlier. Charles Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury, who was named Principal Secretary of State, can really only be described as tilting towards the whigs at this time. But, at the Admiralty and the Treasury, both of which were put into commission, in each case a whig stalwart was named as the first commissioner--Lord Mordaunt and Arthur Herbert respectivelyBand also in each case a number of other leading whigs were named to the commission as well.i Whig lawyers, on the whole, did rather better than their lay fellow-partisans. Devonshire lawyer and Inner Temple Bencher Henry Pollexfen was immediately appointed Attorney- General, and his cousin, Middle Templar George Treby, Solicitor General.
[Show full text]
The Sovereign and Parliament
Library Note The Sovereign and Parliament The Sovereign fulfils a number of ceremonial and formal roles with respect to Parliament, established by conventions, throughout the parliamentary calendar. The State Opening of Parliament marks the beginning of each new session of Parliament. It is the only routine occasion when the three constituent parts of Parliament—that is the Sovereign, the House of Lords and the House of Commons—meet. The Queen’s Speech during State Opening is the central element around which the ceremony pivots, without which no business of either the House of Lords or the House of Commons can proceed. Each ‘Parliament’ lasts a maximum of five years, within which there are a number of sessions. Each session is ‘prorogued’ to mark its end. An announcement is made in the House of Lords, to Members of both Houses following the Queen’s command that Parliament should be prorogued by a commissioner of a Royal Commission. At the end of the final session of each Parliament—which is immediately prior to the next general election—Parliament is also dissolved. Following the Prime Minister’s advice, the Sovereign issues a proclamation summoning the new Parliament, appointing the day for the first meeting of Parliament. All bills must be agreed by both Houses of Parliament and the Sovereign before they can become Acts of Parliament. Once a bill has passed both Houses, it is formally agreed by the Sovereign by a process known as royal assent. Additionally, Queen’s consent is sometimes required before a bill completes its passage through Parliament, if the bill affects the Sovereign.
[Show full text]
Ireland: an Island of Cultural Variety
1 INTRODUCTION IRELAND: AN ISLAND OF CULTURAL VARIETY Throughout its history, Ulster, the northern province of Ireland, has been a place where many different peoples have left their influence. In the last millennium Vikings, Anglo-Normans, Huguenots, Moravians, Italians, Jews and many others have settled here. The strongest cultural influences, however, have been English, Irish and Scottish, a triple blend that has given Ulster its distinctive character. At the narrowest part, only 13 miles separate Ulster – Ireland’s northern province – and Scotland. The sea has been a bridge rather than a barrier. Almost 2 million people make the crossing by ferry every year. THREE NAMES FOR THE SAME PEOPLE Ulster-Scots, Scotch-Irish and Scots-Irish are three names for a people whose origins can be traced to Scotland. In Ulster, where they settled in large numbers in the 1600s, they are known as the Ulster-Scots. In America, they are known as the Scotch-Irish or Scots-Irish. All three terms have a long pedigree – the earliest recorded use of ‘Scotch-Irish’ can be found in Maryland in 1690. THE SCOTCH-IRISH AND AMERICA Over the centuries Scotch-Irish families have travelled to every corner of the globe in search of new lives and new opportunities. In the United States their influence has been huge and their legacy includes pioneers, presidents, military commanders, religious leaders, educators, philanthropists Only two names appear on the printed Declaration of Independence. and giants of industry and commerce. John Hancock is thought to have had County Down ancestry, while Charles Thomson was born in County Londonderry.
[Show full text]
Grenzeloos Actuariaat
grenzeloos actuariaat BRON: WIKIPEDIA grenzeloos actuariaat: voor u geselecteerd uit de buitenlandse bladen q STATE OPENING OF PARLIAMENT In the United Kingdom, the State Opening of Parliament is an the Commons Chamber due to a custom initiated in the seventeenth annual event that marks the commencement of a session of the century. In 1642, King Charles I entered the Commons Chamber and Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is held in the House of Lords attempted to arrest five members. The Speaker famously defied the Chamber, usually in late October or November, or in a General King, refusing to inform him as to where the members were hiding. Election year, when the new Parliament first assembles. In 1974, Ever since that incident, convention has held that the monarch cannot when two General Elections were held, there were two State enter the House of Commons. Once on the Throne, the Queen, wearing Openings. the Imperial State Crown, instructs the house by saying, ‘My Lords, pray be seated’, she then motions the Lord Great Chamberlain to summon the House of Commons. PREPARATION The State Opening is a lavish ceremony. First, the cellars of the Palace SUMMONING OF THE COMMONS of Westminster are searched by the Yeomen of the Guard in order to The Lord Great Chamberlain raises his wand of office to signal to the prevent a modern-day Gunpowder Plot. The Plot of 1605 involved a Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, who has been waiting in the failed attempt by English Catholics to blow up the Houses of Commons lobby.
[Show full text]
Biographical Appendix
Biographical Appendix The following women are mentioned in the text and notes. Abney- Hastings, Flora. 1854–1887. Daughter of 1st Baron Donington and Edith Rawdon- Hastings, Countess of Loudon. Married Henry FitzAlan Howard, 15th Duke of Norfolk, 1877. Acheson, Theodosia. 1882–1977. Daughter of 4th Earl of Gosford and Louisa Montagu (daughter of 7th Duke of Manchester and Luise von Alten). Married Hon. Alexander Cadogan, son of 5th Earl of Cadogan, 1912. Her scrapbook of country house visits is in the British Library, Add. 75295. Alten, Luise von. 1832–1911. Daughter of Karl von Alten. Married William Montagu, 7th Duke of Manchester, 1852. Secondly, married Spencer Cavendish, 8th Duke of Devonshire, 1892. Grandmother of Alexandra, Mary, and Theodosia Acheson. Annesley, Katherine. c. 1700–1736. Daughter of 3rd Earl of Anglesey and Catherine Darnley (illegitimate daughter of James II and Catherine Sedley, Countess of Dorchester). Married William Phipps, 1718. Apsley, Isabella. Daughter of Sir Allen Apsley. Married Sir William Wentworth in the late seventeenth century. Arbuthnot, Caroline. b. c. 1802. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. She did not marry. Arbuthnot, Marcia. 1804–1878. Daughter of Rt. Hon. Charles Arbuthnot. Stepdaughter of Harriet Fane. Married William Cholmondeley, 3rd Marquess of Cholmondeley, 1825. Aston, Barbara. 1744–1786. Daughter and co- heir of 5th Lord Faston of Forfar. Married Hon. Henry Clifford, son of 3rd Baron Clifford of Chudleigh, 1762. Bannister, Henrietta. d. 1796. Daughter of John Bannister. She married Rev. Hon. Brownlow North, son of 1st Earl of Guilford, 1771. Bassett, Anne. Daughter of Sir John Bassett and Honor Grenville.
[Show full text]
Alaris Capture Pro Software
John HowardQDuke of Norfolk: A Possible Murderer of the Princes? ANNE CRAWFORD THAT JOHN, Loan HOWARD, created Duke of Norfolk by Richard III, was the man responsible for the deaths of Edward V and Richard, Duke of York, is a comparatively new theory.l For five hundred years after they died, no mention is made of Howard in the context of the murder. The first suggestio'n that he might have been involved was made in 1844 by Payne Collier, who edited Howard’s second volume of household accounts. In them he found an entry noting payment made on May 21, 1483, to six men for a day’s labour at the Tower, -to the carpenter for making three beds and for two sacks of lime.2 The reference to the beds and lime set Payne Collier’s mind working upon novel lines, but his suggestion that Howard might have had something to do with the murders was not followed up for more than a hundred years. A much more elaborate case is propounded by Melvin 1. Tucker in his biography of Thomas Howard, second Duke of Norfolk, John’s son and heir. He bases his case on “a strong motive and a series of interesting coincidences”.3 The motive was the Howards’ desire to gain their rightful half-share of the Mowbray inheritance of the‘ dukes of Norfolk, at that time vested in Richard, Duke of York and Norfolk, widower of the Mowbray heiress, and possibly the dukedom itself.‘ The coincidences may briefly be summarised. They include, according to Tucker, the fact that Howard was Constable of the Tower and therefore had access to the princes, the entry in his accéunts for the beds and lime, his past friendship with the Protector, the role he played in persuading the queen to give up York and the support he continued to give Richard for the rest of his reign.
[Show full text]
Our Old Nobility. by Noblesse Oblige [Pseud.]
Gc 929.7201 Evlo v.l 1267345 GENEALOGY COLLECTl V im ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00726 8128 OUR OLD NOBILITY. OUR OLD NOBILITY. - NOBLESSE OBLIGE, p s ~u A V. ^•i^CO'A'Z? EDITION, PUBLISHED FOR THE POLITICAL TRACT SOCIETY, By E. J. KIBBLEWHITE, 3f, TAVISTOCK STREET, COVENT GARDEN, W.C. 1S7;, PREFACE^ I HIS book is a reprint, with a few corrections and additions, of a series of articles which have ap- peared in the Echo. Should it meet with public approbation I intend in due time to reprint a second series which is now appearing every Saturday in the same journal I desire to express my obligations to Mr. Macqueen, Sec- retary of the Financial Reform Association, for the valuable information which he has compiled from the Landowners Return, and published in the Financial Reformer diXid Financial Reform Almanack. I have also to tender my thanks to various correspondents, some of them being members of the families of whom I have written, for information by which I have been enabled to correct and add to the original articles in the EcJio. It has been my endeavour to state facts as accurately as possible, and scarcely any of the statements I have made have been called in question; in fact the only important correction which I have been compelled to make was in regard to a living duke, who is credited in a County History with having discharged his father's debts. Unpaid ; VI Preface written to me denying this, I have been creditors having J statement.
[Show full text]