DOCSLIB.ORG

If You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File, Please Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
If You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File, Please Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. ~rJ ~ U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Topical +Search 1-800-732-3277 • :, ' , :•~' i +~ i ¸I ,J.... A Service of the Bureau of Justice Statistics Clearinghouse/NCJRS +, 4. UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS for the United States 1993 HOMICIDE PATTERNS - PAST AND PRESENT LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL PRINTED ANNUALLY Federal Bureau of Investigation U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20535 AI:)'vIS C)RY.- Committee on Uniform Crime Records International Association of Chiefs of Police; Committee on Uniform Crime Reporting National Sheriffs' Association; Criminal Justice Information Services Data Providers Advisory Policy Board For sale by the U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN 0-16-045321-6 _CH~kRT 2.1~:~ l~ ME199 CLOC !( .... one • MURDER every 21 minutes one FORCIBLE RAPE ' every 5 minutes one ROBBERY every 48 seconds one VIOLENT CRIME one every 16 seconds AGGRAVATED ASSAULT. every 28 seconds one CRIME INDEX OFFENSE every 2 seconds one .j- one- BURGLARY PROPERTY CRIME every 11 seconds every 3 seconds One LARCENY-THEFT every 4 seconds one MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT The Crime~C;Iock should be viewed with every 20 seconds care., Bein.g the most aggregate representatibn of UCR data, it is designed to convey the annual reported crime exper!enc.¢ by showing the relative frequency, of occurrence of the Index Offenses. This mode of display should not be taken to imply a regularity in. the commission of the Part I OffenseS; rather, it repreSents the annual ratio of crime to fixed -time-intervals. - ~. 4 During the conference, three overall endorsements were pation, meeting all NIBRS data submission requirements. passed without dissent. First, that there be established a The pace of NIBRS implementation will be commensu- new. incident-based national crime reporting system; sec- rate with the resources, abilities, and limitations of the ond, that the FBI manage this Program; and third, that an contributing law enforcement agencies. The FBI was able to Advisory Policy Board composed of law enforcement execu- accept N IBRS data as of January, 1989, and-nine-state-level tives be formed to assist in the direction and implementa- UCR Programs (Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, North tion of the new Program. Dakota, South Carolina, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia) are Information about the redesigned UCR Program, called now supplying data in the NIBRS format. An additional 18 the National Incident-Based Reporting System or NIBRS, state agencies, as well as three local law enforcement agen- is contained in four documents produced subsequent to the cies in non-Program states and one federal agency (the Orange Beach Conference. Volume 1, Data Collection FBI), have submitted test tapes or disks containing the Guidelines, Contains a system overview and descriptions of expanded data. Seventeen other state UCR Programs and the offenses, offense codes, reports, data elements, and data agencies in the District of Columbia and Guam are in values used in the system. Volume 2, Data Submission Speci- various stages of planning and development. Test tapes for fications, is for the use of state and •local systems personnel six of these states, the District of Columbia, and Guam are who are responsible for-preparing magnetic tapes/floppy expected during 1994. disks/etc., for submission to the FBI. Volume3, Approaches to Implementing an Incident-Based Reporting (IBR) System, is Recent Developments for use by computer programmers, analysts, etc., respon- sible for developing a state or local IBR system which will STATE UCR PROGRAMS - UCR welcomed two states meet NIBRS' reporting requirements, Volume 4, Error Mes- to the ranks of state-level programs, Louisiana and Nevada. sage Manual, contains designations of mandatory and In 1993, the Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement optional data elements, data element edits and error mes- and the Nevada Highway Patrol each commenced collection sages. of UCR data from local law enforcement within their A NIBRS edition of the UCR Handbook~has been pro- respective states. With their addition, there are now state duced to assist law enf0rcementagency data contributors Programs in 44 states and the. District-of. Columbia: implementing NIBRS within their departments.This docu- HATE CRIME STATISTICS - The Hate Crime Statis- ment is geared toward familiarizing local and state law tics~Act, passed by the U.S. Congress andsigned by the enforcement personnel with the definitions, policies, and President in April, 1990, mandates .a data collection of procedures of NIBRS. It does not contain the technical crimes motivated by religious, ethnic, racial, Or sexual- coding and data transmission requirements presented in orientation prejudice. Collection commenced January 1, Volumes 1 through 4. 1991, and the UCR Program has distributed hate crime NIBRS will collect data on each single incident' and Data Collection• Guidelines and Training 'Guides to city; arrest within 22 crime categories. For each :offense known county, and state law.enforcement agencies.~Training ses- to police within these categories, incident, victim, property, sions have been held across the Nation-to educate federal; offender, and arrestee information will be gathered when state, and local law enforcement- agencies in the. hate crime available. The goal of the redesign is to modernize crime reporting procedures. The:first armual hate crime pUbli- information by collecting data presently maintained in law - c~iiioii,~fii~h 66ntainea°i992 s:tatistics; has been produce d, enforcement records; the enhanced UCR Program is, there- and a 1993. issue is planned for late 1994. Participation fore, a byproduct of current records, systems. The integrity continues_-to.grow; :i993. submissions were received from of UCR's-long-running statistical series will, of course, be 6,8401aw enforcement agencies covering 56percent-of the maintained. U.S. population. It became apparent during the ~development of the VIOLENCE AGAINST POLICE OFFICERS - A "Vio- prototype system that the level-one and level two reporting lence Against Law Enforcement Officers" study funded by proposed in the "Blueprint" may not be the most practical a grant from the National Institute of Justice is now under- approach. Many state and local law enforcement admin- way. It will examine 40 selected incidents of Serious assault istrators indicated that the collection of data on all perti- by cutting instrument or firearm where the victim officer nent offenses could be handled with more ease than could survived the incident. Extensive interviews of victim officers the extraction of selected ones. While "Limited" partici- and convicted assailants are' now being conducted, and a pation, equivalent to the "Blueprint's" level one, will remain special report is planned for 1995. The report will attempt an option, it appears that most reporting jurisdictions, upon to answer questions raised in the earlier report, Killed in the implementation, will go immediately to "Full" partici- Line of Duty. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER DEFINITION Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, as defined in the Uniform Crime Reporting Pro- gram, is the willful (nonnegligent) killing of one human being by another. The classification of this offense, as for all other Crime Index offenses, is based solely on police investigation as opposed to the determination of a court, medical examiner, coroner, jury, or other judicial body. NOt included in the count for this offense classification are deaths caused by negligence, suicide, or.accident; justifiable homicides; and attempts to murder or assaults to murder, which are scored as aggravated assaults. TREND Rate per 100,000 Year Number of offenses inhabitants 1992 ................... 23,760 9.3 1993 ................... 24,526 9.5 Percent change. ....... + 3.2 +2.2 13 The total number of murders in the United States during Rate 1993 was estimated at 24,526. Monthly figures show that Up 2 percent over the 1992 rate, the national murder rate more persons were murdered in the month of December in in 1993 was 10 per 100,000 inhabitants. Five- and 10-year 1993, while the fewest were killed in February. (See Table 2.3.) trends showed the 1993 rate was 9 percent higher than in 1989 and 20 percent above the 1984 rate. On a-regional basis, the South averaged 11 murders per Table 2.3-Murder by Month, 1989-1993 ]Percent distribution] 100,000 people; the West, 10 per 100,000; and the Midwest Months 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 and Northeast, 8 per 100,000. Compared to 1992, murder January ................. 8.1 7.9 8.0 8.1 8.1 rates in 1993 increased in three of the four geographic regions. February ................ 7.1 7.0 7.0 7.5 6.7 The Midwest experienced no change. (See Table 4.) March ................... 7.8 8.0 7.7 8.2 7.9 April ..................... 7.9 7.4 Z8 _ 8.0 7.6 The Nation's metropolitan areas reported a 1993 murder May ..................... 7.8 8.1 8.1 8.5 7.8 rate of 11 victims per 100,000 inhabitants. In the rural lune ..................... 8.2 8.4 8.6 7.9 8.6 luly ............... : ...... 9.1 9.6 9.1 9.1 9.3 counties and in cities outside metropolitan areas, the rate August ................... 9.0 9:3 9.4 9.1 9.2 was 5 per 100,000. ~eptember ................ 8.8 9.2 8.8 8.7 8.3 Dctober .................. 8.9 8.8 8.6 8.0 8,4 November ................ 8.5 7.6 7.8 8.1 8.2 Nature December ................ 8.7 8.8 9.0 8.8 9.8 Supplemental data provided by contributing agencies When viewing the regions of the Nation, the Southern recorded information for 23,271 of the estimated 24,526 States, the most populous region, accounted for 41 percent murders in 1993.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Applicant Rankings by State
    Applicant Rankings by State *For additional information on the creation of these indices please see www.cops.usdoj.gov/Default.asp?Item=2208 **Note that this list contains 7,202 agencies. There were 58 agencies that were found to be ineligible for funding and 12 that withdrew after submitting applications, for a total of 7,272 applications received. Crime and Crime and Fiscal Need Community Final Index: Community Index: 0-50 Policing Index: 0- 0-100 Fiscal Need Policing Possible 50 Possible Possible Index Index Final Index State ORI Agency Name Points Points Points Percentile Percentile Percentile Akiachak Native Community Police AK AK002ZZ Department 31.20 36.75 67.95 99.9% 91.6% 99.9% AK AK085ZZ Tuluksak Native Community 21.18 39.44 60.62 98.5% 95.6% 99.2% AK AK038ZZ Akiak Native Community 18.85 38.40 57.25 96.7% 94.5% 98.0% AK AK033ZZ Manokotak, Village of 20.66 35.68 56.35 98.3% 89.4% 97.5% AK AK065ZZ Anvik Tribal Council 20.53 34.91 55.44 98.2% 87.6% 97.0% AK AK090ZZ Native Village of Kotlik 11.10 43.90 54.99 52.1% 98.9% 96.6% AK AK062ZZ Atmautluak Traditional Council 21.26 33.06 54.31 98.6% 82.7% 96.0% AK AK008ZZ Kwethluk, Organized Village of 25.85 25.97 51.82 99.7% 56.9% 93.8% AK AK057ZZ Gambell Police Department 20.37 30.93 51.30 98.1% 76.2% 93.0% AK AK095ZZ Alakanuk Tribal Council 22.18 26.44 48.61 99.0% 58.8% 89.4% AK AK00109 Sitka, City and Borough of 10.48 37.16 47.64 44.1% 92.3% 87.5% AK AK00102 Fairbank Department of Public Safety 11.64 35.25 46.89 58.8% 88.5% 85.8% AK AK00115 Yakutat Department of Public Safety 8.16 38.39 46.56 15.2% 94.5% 85.1% AK AK00101 Anchorage Police Department 13.52 31.27 44.79 77.3% 77.2% 80.7% AK AK00107 Petersburg Police Department 9.70 32.48 42.18 32.8% 81.3% 73.4% AK AK123ZZ Native Village of Napakiak 14.49 25.32 39.81 84.1% 54.2% 66.1% AK AK119ZZ City of Mekoryuk 12.65 26.94 39.59 69.7% 61.0% 65.4% Klawock Department of Public AK AK00135 Safety/Police Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles. Leslie Alabaster Police Department 201 1St Street North
    Charles. Leslie Alabaster Police Department 201 1st Street North Alabaster, Alabama 35007 205- 664-6817 [email protected] Charles W. Wood Calhoun County Sheriff's Office 400 West 8th Street Anniston, Alabama 36201 (256) 820-6710 [email protected] Capt. Tom Stofer Auburn Department of Public Safety 161 North Ross Street Auburn, Alabama 36830 334-501- 3119 [email protected] La'Quaylin Parhm or Damon Johnson Birmingham Police Department 1710 First Avenue North Birmingham, Alabama 35203 (205) 933-4175 [email protected] James G. Fadely Jefferson County Sheriff's Office Reserves 2200 8th Avenue North Birmingham, Alabama 35203 205- 325-5700 [email protected] Robert Burnett Chelsea Citizen Observer Patrol City of Chelsea P.O. Box 111 Chelsea, Alabama 35043 205-281- 4082 [email protected] Officer David Hicks Clanton Police Department Police Explorers 601 1st Ave. Clanton, Alabama 35045 (205) 755-1194 [email protected] Jim Smith Police Chief Cottonwood Police Department P. O. Box 447 Cottonwood, Alabama 36320 334- 691-2113 [email protected] Capt. David J. Sandlin Cullman County Sheriff's Office 1910 Beech Avenue, S.E. Cullman, Alabama 35055 256-734- 0342 [email protected] Tom Barry Decatur Citizens Police Academy Alumni Association P O Box 5581 Decatur, Alabama 35601 256-301- 3139 [email protected] Tommie J. Reese, Chief of Police Demopolis Police Department 301 East Washington Street Demopolis, Alabama 36732 334- 289-3073 [email protected] Samuel Crawford Wiregrass Retired Senior Volunteer Program 501 North Foster St. Dothan, Alabama 36303 334-836- 1300 [email protected] Alan Hicks, Asst. Chief Douglas Police Reserves P.
    [Show full text]
  • State Police (Also Called State Troopers Or Highway Patrol) Are a Police Body Unique to 49 of the U.S
    United States In the United States, state police (also called state troopers or highway patrol) are a police body unique to 49 of the U.S. states, having statewide authority to conduct law enforcement activities and criminal investigations. Hawaii, being a widely dispersed A North Carolina state trooper's car archipelago, has four separate on I-85 in 2008. county-based police agencies, rather than a single statewide police agency. In general, these police agencies perform functions outside the jurisdiction of the county sheriff, such as enforcing traffic laws on state highways and interstate expressways, overseeing the security of the state capitol complex, protecting the governor, training new officers for local police forces too small to operate an academy, providing technological and scientific services, supporting local police and helping to coordinate multi-jurisdictional task force activity in serious or complicated cases in those states that grant full police powers statewide. A general trend has been to bring all of these agencies under a state Department of Public Safety. Additionally, they may serve under different state departments such as the Highway Patrol under the state Department of Transportation and the Marine patrol under the state Department of Natural Resources. Twenty-two U.S. states use the term "State Police", fifteen use the term "Highway Patrol", seven use the term "State Patrol", three use the term "State Highway Patrol", while Alaska's agency is the "Division of Alaska State Troopers" and Arkansas has a "Highway Police" in addition to its "State Police". The term "highway patrol" tends to be more common in the southeast and mountain west States.
    [Show full text]
  • Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency by State Fiscal Year 2015
    Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency by State Fiscal Year 2015 Alabama Agency Name Agency Type Cash Value Sales Proceeds Totals 17th Judicial Circuit Drug Task Force Local $321,799 $12,177 $333,976 32nd Judicial Circuit, Cullman District Attorney's Office Local $3,038 $0 $3,038 41st Judicial Circuit, District Attorney's Office Local $18,265 $1,933 $20,198 Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Board - Law Enforcement Division State $20,854 $23,716 $44,570 Alabama Department Of Public Safety State $97,465 $0 $97,465 Alabama Law Enforcement Agency Local $71,935 $0 $71,935 Alabama National Guard Counterdrug Program State $7,491 $1,406 $8,897 Alabama Office Of The Attorney General State $1,326 $20,388 $21,714 Alabama Port Authority Police Department Local $1,761 $2,454 $4,215 Auburn City Police Department Local $753 $26,602 $27,355 Autauga County Sheriff's Office Local $836 $1,673 $2,509 Baldwin County Sheriff's Office Local $35,190 $4,068 $39,258 Bessemer Police Department Local $612,867 $3,900 $616,767 Birmingham Police Department Local $64,551 $6,772 $71,323 Calera Police Department Local $8,394 $2,900 $11,294 Central Alabama Drug Task Force Task Force $21,336 $42,614 $63,950 City Of Daphne Police Department Local $11,328 $0 $11,328 City Of Hoover Police Department Local $207,607 $2,433 $210,040 City Of Jasper Police Department Local $8,804 $0 $8,804 City Of Montgomery Police Department Local $196,774 $21,588 $218,362 Cullman Police Department Local $196 $0 $196 Daleville Department Of Public Safety
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Crime Data Reporting a Step-By-Step Guide for Native American Tribes to Begin Sharing Crime Data Statistics Using Ucr
    TRIBAL CRIME DATA REPORTING A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES TO BEGIN SHARING CRIME DATA STATISTICS USING UCR THE NATIONAL CENTER_ FOR. R.UR.ALLAWENFOR.CEMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE NATIONAL CENTER FOR RURAL LAW ENFORCEMENT UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS SYSTEM 7723 COLONEL GLENN ROAD, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72204-7503 TOLL-FREE: 1-877-478-5477 WWW.TJISS.NET TRIBAL CRIME DATA REPORTING CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 The Criminal Data Collection and Information Sharing Training for Tribes (CDCISTT) .........1 Manual Overview ...................................................................................................................... 1 Tribal Justice Information Sharing System (TJISS) .................................................................2 CDCISTT and TJISS Affiliations ................................................................................................. 2 What is UCR?................................................................................................................................... 3 The Summary Reporting System .............................................................................................3 The National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) .......................................................6 Similarities Between the Summary Reporting System and NIBRS .......................................6 The Benefits of UCR .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Enforcement Administration Official Notification Posted
    DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION POSTED ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 DEA OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION POSTED ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 LEGAL NOTICE ATTENTION The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) gives notice that the property listed below was seized for federal forfeiture for violation of federal law. Laws and procedures applicable to the forfeiture process can be found at 19 U.S.C. Sections 1602 - 1619, 18 U.S.C. Section 983, and 28 C.F.R. Parts 8 and 9. To File a Petition for Remission or Mitigation: The government may consider granting petitions for remission or mitigation, which pardons all or part of the property from the forfeiture. You may file both a claim and a Petition for Remission or Mitigation (Petition). If you file only a petition and no one else files a claim, your petition will be decided by the seizing agency and will not be heard in U.S. District Court. The petition must include a description of your interest in the property supported by documentation, include any facts you believe justify the return of the property, and be signed under oath, subject to the penalty of perjury or meet the requirements of an unsworn statement under penalty of perjury. See 28 U.S.C. Section 1746. For the regulations pertaining to remission or mitigation of the forfeiture, see 28 C.F.R. Sections 9.1 – 9.9. The criteria for remission of the forfeiture are found at 28 C.F.R. Section 9.5(a). The criteria for mitigation of the forfeiture are found at 28 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • GPD PERSONNEL Hence, the Creation of the Government of Guam
    FISCAL YEAR 2016 PUBLISHED AUGUST 2017 CITIZEN CENTRIC REPORT GUAM POLICE DEPARMENT D ipåttamenton Polisian Guåhan Guam Police Department MISSION STATEMENT Bldg. 13-16A Mariner Avenue Tiyan, Guam 96913 Tel: 475-8509 The Guam Police Department continues to serve the community and is charged Fax: 472-4036 with the enforcement of all criminal laws. Each police officer is authorized to Website:DUI www.gpd.guam.gov Checkpoint protect life and property, enforce the law, prevent crime, preserve the peace, Email: [email protected] arrest violators of the law, serve the public, appropriately conduct searches and seizures, and perform the duties of a peace officer. The Department is authorized to cooperate with any Federal, state, national or international law enforcement agency, including any law enforcement entity of any INSIDE THIS GUIDE possession of the United States, where a reciprocal agreement exists in detecting Mission Statement 1 crime, apprehending criminal offenders and preserving law and order. Performance 2 The Guam Police Department shall have jurisdiction within the Territory of Guam Financial Report 3 over all lands, whether titled to the government or not, including submerged lands, all waterways whether navigable or not, and over all air space above such land and Future Outlook 4 waterways with respect to which the Territory has jurisdiction. ABOUT THE GUAM POLICE DEPARTMENT Full-Time Personnel in GPD Guam’s first local policing effort was established on August 14, 1905 under the control of the United States Navy. The first policemen were As of December 2016: 2014 2015 2016 natives of Guam who were members of the Insular Patrol Force, a Sworn Personnel 300 325 303 component of the Guam Insular Guard.
    [Show full text]
  • Programs Across the United States That Aid Motorists in the Reporting of Impaired Drivers to Law Enforcement
    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Programs Across the United States That Aid Motorists in the Reporting of Impaired Drivers to Law Enforcement Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date March 2007 Programs Across the United States That Aid Motorists in the Reporting of Impaired Drivers to Law Enforcement 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Dary Fiorentino, Magda Cure, Joshua Kipper 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Southern California Research Institute 11914 West Washington Blvd. 11. Contract or Grant No. Los Angeles, California 90066 DTNH22-04-H-05087 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered DOT/National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Final Report Office of Behavioral Safety Research NTI-131, Room 5119 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 400 Seventh Street SW. Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes Amy Berning and Christine Sicinski served as the project Contracting Officer’s Technical Representatives. 16. Abstract The objective of this project was to identify States that use a statewide cellular drunk driving reporting program which provide free airtime and allow motorists with cell phones to dial a special number (such as *DUI) to report suspected drunk drivers. Through contacts at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Regional Offices and State Highway Safety Offices, researchers identified the entity in each State and United States territory most likely to be able to discuss cellular-telephone-based reporting of impaired drivers. Each person was then contacted via telephone and was asked to provide information regarding the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Officers Water Safety and Survival
    Florida Officer’s Water Safety and Survival Doug Seely Abstract Officers have lost their lives in the performance of their duties. We train to prevent or mitigate these situations as much as possible with firearms training, defensive tactics training, driver training, etc. Florida is known as a very progressive state in its training for Officers. However we do not provide state wide training in water safety and survival. Our state is surrounded by water and is third in square mileage for water to land ratio in the nation. What can be done about this? It should be mandated that there is an evaluation system to test and train our officers in water safety. Introduction An often overlooked cause of police fatalities is drowning. It is in the top ten reasons why officers die in the performance of their duties (Table 1). Florida is third in the nation for land to water ratio. Merriam-Webster 11Th Collegiate Dictionary defines drowning as to suffocate by submersion especially in water. Drowning could be intentional or, as in most cases, unintentional. Many agencies have overlooked this in their job task analysis for their officers at the street level usually because nothing has happened to anyone in the agency in this area. Even the academies have possibly overlooked this for it is not being taught in most police academies. The media and movies have shown what they think is the correct way for an officer to handle a water type scenario by shedding their gear. Is the correct way? This writer’s interest in this problem comes from attending a water safety class and realizing that this is an overlooked problem in our state.
    [Show full text]
  • State Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Contacts
    State Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Contacts Alabama Alabama Criminal Justice Information Center Crime Statistics and Information Division 201 South Union Street Montgomery, AL 36130 (334) 517-2601 www.alea.gov Alaska Alaska Department of Public Safety Criminal Records & Identification Bureau 5700 East Tudor Road Anchorage, AK 99507 (907) 269-5526 www.dps.alaska.gov/Home American Samoa American Samoa Department of Public Safety Uniform Crime Reporting Post Office Box 1086 Pago Pago, AS 96799 011 (684) 633-1111 x54 Arizona Arizona Department of Public Safety Compliance & Information Services Bureau Uniform Crime Reporting Program Access Integrity Unit Post Office Box 6638 | Mail Drop 3160 Phoenix, AZ 85005-6638 (602) 223-2488 www.azdps.gov Arkansas Arkansas Crime Information Center 322 South Main, Suite 615 Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 682-7408 www.acic.org Bureau of Indian Affairs Office of Justice Services Bureau of Indian Affairs MIB MS 4551 1849 C Street Northwest Washington, DC 20240 (916) 978-6060 California California Department of Justice Criminal Justice Statistics Center Post Office Box 903427 Sacramento, CA 94203-4270 (916) 210-4126 www.oag.ca.gov/crime Colorado Colorado Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reporting Suite 3000 690 Kipling Street Denver, CO 80215 (303) 239-4214 www.colorado.gov/cbi Connecticut Connecticut State Police Crimes Analysis Unit 1111 Country Club Road Middletown, CT 06457 (860) 685-8030 www.dpsdata.ct.gov/dps/ucr/ucr.aspx Delaware Delaware Bureau of Identification Post Office Box 430 Dover,
    [Show full text]
  • Guam Police Department Dipåttamentondipåttamenton Polisianpolisian Guåhanguåhan
    Fiscal Year 2013 Published December 26, 2013 AA CitizenCitizen--CentricCentric ReportReport forfor Guam Police Department DipåttamentonDipåttamenton PolisianPolisian GuåhanGuåhan Mission Statement Table of Contents Mission Statement 1 The Guam Police Department exists to serve the community by protecting life and property; by preventing crime; by enforcing the laws; and by maintaining order for all Performance 2 citizens. Central to our mission are the values that guide our work and decisions, and help us Financial Report 3 contribute to the quality of life on Guam. Our values are characteristics or qualities of worth. They are non-negotiable. Although Future Outlook 4 we may need to balance them, we will never ignore them for the sake of expediency or Guam Police Department personal preferences. Bldg. 13-16A Mariner Ave. Tiyan, Guam 96913 We hold our values constantly before us to teach and remind us, and the community we serve, of our ideals. They are the foundation on which our policies, goals, and Tel: 475-8509 operations are built. Fax: 472-4036 In fulfilling our mission, we need the support of citizens, elected representatives and Web: http://gpd.guam.gov island officials in order to provide the quality of service our values commit us to providing. We, the men and women of the Guam Police Department, value: Human Life, Integrity, Laws and Constitution, Excellence, Accountability, Cooperation, Problem Solving, and Ourselves. ABOUT THE GUAM POLICE DEPARTMENT On August 14, 1905, Guam’s first true local policing effort was established under the control of the United States Navy. The first policemen were natives of Guam. These brave and heroic men were members of the Insular Patrol Force as part of the Guam Insular Guard.
    [Show full text]
  • IACP Law Enforcement Leadership Institutes on Violence Against Women Number of Departments Trained by State
    IACP Law Enforcement Leadership Institutes on Violence Against Women Number of Departments Trained by State Alabama (3) Hawaii (0) Missouri (16) Rhode Island (2) Alaska (3) Idaho (4) Montana (5) South Carolina (7) Arizona (14) Illinois (60) Nebraska (1) South Dakota (6) Arkansas (1) Indiana (4) Nevada (4) Tennessee (7) California (13) Iowa (12) New Hampshire (10) Texas (18) Canada (1) Kansas (10) New Jersey (5) Utah (6) Colorado (10) Kentucky (6) New Mexico (2) Vermont (25) Connecticut (8) Louisiana (7) New York (12) Virginia (13) District of Columbia Maine (1) North Carolina (9) Washington (7) (2) Maryland (11) North Dakota (3) West Virginia (1) Delaware (3) Massachusetts (26) Ohio (35) Wisconsin (10) Florida (4) Michigan (8) Oklahoma (3) Wyoming (1) Georgia (16) Minnesota (17) Orgon(8) Guam (1) Mississippi (8) Pennsylvania (7) IACP Law Enforcement Leadership Institute on Violence Against Women Alumni Departments Alabama (3) Boaz Police Department, Boaz, AL Calera Police Department, Calera, AL Florence Police Department, Florence, AL Alaska (3) Alaska Department of Public Safety, Anchorage, AK Alaska State Troopers, Anchorage, AK Ketchikan Police Department, Ketchikan, AK Arizona (14) Apache Junction Police Department, Apache Junction, AZ Arizona State University Police Department, Tempe, AZ City of St. Johns Police Dept, St. Johns, AZ Cottonwood Police Department, Cottonwood, AZ Flagstaff Police Department, Flagstaff, AZ Fort McDowell (Yavapai Nation) Police Department, Fort McDowell, AZ Glendale Police Department, Glendale, AZ Lake
    [Show full text]