DOCSLIB.ORG

In-Depth Study on the United Nations Contribution to the Implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In-Depth Study on the United Nations Contribution to the Implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action In-depth study on the United Nations contribution to the implementation of the Hyogo Framework For Action External study commissioned for the Mid-Term Review 2010-2011 In-depth study on the United Nations contribution to the implementation of the Hyogo Framework For Action External study commissioned for the Mid-Term Review 2010-2011 Prepared by Ms. Eva von Oelreich January 2011 … The Chile earthquake is yet another tragic reminder that disaster risk is increasing globally. The Hyogo Framework for Action commits all countries to make major eff orts to reduce their disaster risk by 2015. The entire UN system is engaged in supporting these eff orts. It is clear that much more needs to be done to ensure that disaster risk reduction becomes natural part of our development eff orts. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon’s remarks to informal plenary meeting of the General Assembly on Chile, 10 March 2010. Hyogo Framework for Action Acknowledgements UNISDR is grateful to all members of the Advisory Group of the Mid-Term Review, who dedicated their time and advice to this project free of charge and with great commitment to the cause of disaster risk reduction, including by providing insightful comments on various drafts of this report under time pressure. In particular, we want to thank Susanne Frueh for advising on the methodology of the Mid-Term Review, Mukesh Kapila for facilitating the online debate on a post-2015 framework, Ronald Jackson for initiating the study on disaster risk reduction in the Caribbean, Virginia Murray for spearheading the study on databases for disaster risk reduction, Marco Ferrari for helping in defi ning the issue of international governance for disaster risk reduction, and Kenzo Oshima for requesting that the Japan International Cooperation Agency conduct an internal review of its contribution to the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action. Several UN colleagues contributed to the Mid-Tem Review throughout 2010. Special thanks are in order to Kamal Kishore of UNDP and David Jackson of UNCDF for dedicating their personal time to this project and contributing with signifi cant pieces of work: the literature review and the study on fi nancial mechanisms at national and local levels for disaster risk reduction. Salvano Briceño has kindly provided valuable advice throughout the Mid-Term Review process. Helena Molin Valdes and Bina Desai of UNISDR and Joern Birkmann at the United Nations University in Bonn facilitated the on-line debates. Marco Toscano-Rivalta contributed on the defi nition of international governance issues, post-2015 elements, on the study on the UN implementation of HFA, and provided critical advice throughout the process. Thanks are Ialso due to UNISDR colleagues in our regional offi ces for their help with the organization of regional workshops, facilitation of contacts with national experts and access to national literature. The UNISDR Information Management Unit provided key support in setting up the Mid-Term Review dedicated pages on PreventionWeb and in backstopping the on-line debates. A word of thanks also goes to Mohammed Omer Mukhier at IFRC, Melisa Bodenhamer at World Vision, and Catherine Dennis at Oxfam International for their contributions. Three interns from the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva - Nena Nedeljkovic, Luca Corredig, and Carina Strahl - collaborated at diff erent times with the Mid-Term Review project and provided valuable support. Letizia Rossano was the Senior Coordinator for the Mid-Term Review in UNISDR. UNISDR also wishes to thank the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation Disaster Management Centre, the United States Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction of the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, National Science and Technology Council and the government of Japan for the organization of thematic sub-regional workshops for the Mid-Term Review as well as the European and Mediterranean Major Hazards Agreement (EUR-OPA) for hosting a meeting to test the Key Questions developed for the Mid-Term Review. The Italian Civil Protection Department of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers organized and supported the launch of the Mid-Term Review Report. 2 The governments of Australia, Japan, and Switzerland provided fi nancial contributions to the Mid-Term Review process. Foreword by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for External study — Mid-Term Review Introduction This in-depth study on the United Nations contribution to the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015 (HFA) is one of a series undertaken within the Mid-Term Review of the HFA. The objective is to review actions taken by the United Nations system as a whole and by its specialized agencies, funds and programmes more directly involved in disaster risk reduction, to ascertain how and to what extent the United Nations is undertaking the tasks outlined in the HFA for international organizations; and to suggest ways in which the engagement of the United Nations System and its specialized agencies focusing on disaster risk reduction can be increased, including by looking at other fi elds where diff erent parts of the UN System have been required to work together on a cross-cutting issue, i.e. HIV/AIDS, mine action, gender issues. The HFA states that its implementation “will be appropriately reviewed” and requests partners (in particular the Inter-Agency Task Force, which in 2007 was replaced by the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction) in the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR) to “prepare periodic reviews on progress towards achieving [its] objectives and priorities....and provide reports and summaries to the [General] Assembly and other United Nations bodies ... based on information from national platforms, regional and international organizations and other stakeholders ...”. Anticipating the approaching mid-point of the HFA, in 2008 the Secretary-General indicated to the General Assembly (GA) that the second session of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction in June 2009 would initiate the Mid-Term Review of the HFA expected by 2010; this was welcomed by the GA. The second session of the Global Platform for Disaster Reduction, held in Geneva on 16-19 June 2009, discussed the scope and modalities for the Mid-Term Review and concluded that it should “address strategic and fundamental matters concerning its implementation to 2015 and beyond”. 3 Hyogo Framework for Action the Implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action In 2005 the 168 countries that endorsed the Hyogo Framework for Action agreed to achieve by 2015 “the substantial reduction of disaster losses, in lives and in the social, economic (HFA) and environmental assets of communities and countries”. An ambitious task to achieve in ten years. Yet, as Henri David Thoreau wrote in 1854, “In the long run, men hit only what they aim at. Therefore, they had better aim at something high”. The Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action has been a critical step in formulating a clear understanding of some of the key strategic issues that will require our full attention and commitment to ensure the further implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action. The Hyogo Framework for Action has been determinant in strengthening and guiding international cooperation eff orts, in generating the political momentum necessary to ensure that disaster risk reduction be used as foundation for sound national and international development agendas as well as in giving a common language and a framework of critical actions to follow to which governments have clearly responded. Whereas it is evident that more eff orts are required and that the challenges at hand are complex, we do have the knowledge, the means and the resources to tackle them. In most cases it is a matter of harnessing these resources (fi nancial, institutional, and human) in more creative, integrated and thus eff ective ways. Strengthening of communities’ resilience requires IInew and innovative forms of public-private partnerships in the political, economic, fi nancial, and research fi elds. This report shows that the HFA has been instrumental in embarking on a path of change that is now irreversible, yet our continued commitment is a critical requirement for success. We are still far from having empowered individuals to adopt a disaster risk reduction approach in their daily lives and demand that development, environmental and humanitarian policies and practices be based on sound risk reduction measures. For the devastating eff ects in terms of lives lost and impact on the social and economic fabric of the societies brought about by the earthquake in Haiti in January 2010 and New Zealand in September 2010 and February 2011, the fl oods in Pakistan in July 2010 and in Australia in December 2010 are only the most recent examples of the long way we still have to go – as individuals, as governments and as an international community – in putting in place eff ective measures to strengthen communities’ resilience to disasters and ensure truly sustainable and resilient development policies and practices. This report provides a contribution to catalyze discussion and focus attention on some of the most urgent and important activities that can be undertaken if we are to achieve the outcome 4 External study — Mid-Term Review Disaster risk reduction, its mandate and the United Nations System II.1 Milestones prior to the Hyogo Framework for Action In 1971, the General Assembly asked the Secretary-General of the United Nations to appoint an Emergency Relief Coordinator for assistance in cases of natural disasters (resolution 2816 (XXVI)): it was a concrete step forward in supporting the need for international coordination. At that time the focus was on relief, warning systems, stock piling and other pre-disaster planning. Prevention was barely mentioned. During the same period, a separate strand of thinking emanated from the development and environment sides.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S.-Japan Approaches to Democracy Promotion
    U.S. JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY PROMOTION U.S. JAPAN Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA 1819 L St NW #300 Washington, DC 20036 [email protected] U.S.-JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY SASAKAWA USA SASAKAWA PROMOTION Edited by Michael R. Auslin and Daniel E. Bob ISBN 9780996656764 51000 > 9 780996 656764 U.S.-JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY PROMOTION Edited by Michael R. Auslin Daniel E. Bob Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA is an independent, American non-profit and non- partisan institution devoted to research, analysis and better understanding of the U.S.-Japan relationship. Sasakawa USA accomplishes its mission through programs that benefit both nations and the broader Asia Pacific region. Our research programs focus on security, diplomacy, economics, trade and technology, and our education programs facilitate people-to-people exchange and discussion among American and Japanese policymakers, influential citizens and the broader public in both countries. ISBN: 978-0-9966567-6-4 Printed in the United States of America. © 2017 by Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA LCCN Number applied for Sasakawa USA does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views expressed herein are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Sasakawa USA, its staff or its board. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by and means without permission in writing from Sasakawa USA. Please direct inquiries to: Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Research Department 1819 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036 P: +1 202-296-6694 This publication can be downloaded at no cost at http://spfusa.org/ Cover photo: © EPA/Barbara Walton Contents Preface .............................................................................................................................v Dennis Blair and Yasushi Akashi INTRODUCTION U.S.-Japan Approaches to Democracy Promotion ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • IV International Conference CHERNOBYL CHILDREN – HEALTH EFFECTS and PSYCHOSOCIAL REHABILITATION June 2-6 2003, Kiev, Ukraine
    1 First Announcement IV International Conference CHERNOBYL CHILDREN – HEALTH EFFECTS AND PSYCHOSOCIAL REHABILITATION June 2-6 2003, Kiev, Ukraine … Millions of people continue to be directly affected by the consequences of this disaster. I remain deeply concerned by their plight. It is particularly disturbing that few people realize the multitude of problems that are still linked to this event and its aftermath. Acute suffering continues. At least three million children require physical treatment. Vast areas of forest and agricultural land have been contaminated. Radiation levels in some areas are still well above normal. People still live with great fear, and those who contemplate having children see one of the great joys in life become yet another source of insecurity. This disaster is a matter of global concern. International assistance has been an important part of the response, including through the United Nations. We are now moving towards a long-term approach that would bring help to the most affected people and communities, and promote a return to normalcy… Kofi A. Annan Secretary-General of the United Nations (Remarks at visit to the museum of Chernobyl, Ukraine, 3 June 2002) 2 ORGANISERS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR THE HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS (OCHA) WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION (WHO) UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (UNDP), UKRAINE ASSOCIATION “PHYSICIANS OF CHERNOBYL” In co-operation with: • United Nations Representative Office in Ukraine • United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) • International Atomic
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Overview Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
    world development report2011 Overview Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Conflict, Security, and Development world development report2011 Confl ict, Security, and Development world development report2011 Confl ict, Security, and Development Overview © 2011 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org All rights reserved 1 2 3 4 14 13 12 11 This document summarizes the World Development Report 2011. It is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • CPC Outreach Journal #531
    USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Maxwell AFB, Alabama Issue No. 531, 10 October 2006 Articles & Other Documents: U.N. Warns N. Korea On Nuclear Test U.N. Council Urges N. Korea Not To Conduct Nuclear Test Six Powers Agree To Take Next Step On Iran Nuclear Test Threat Strains Korea Border North Korea's Nuclear Intentions, Out There For All To N. Korea Might Lose Its Only Ally See U.S. Project Could Start Atomic War, Experts Warn U.S. Urges Sanctions On North Korea U.S. Doubts Korean Test Was Nuclear Pentagon Assesses Responses, Including A Possible Blockade For U.S., A Strategic Jolt After North Korea's Test Condemnation Swift, But Options Are Limited Pentagon Hunting For Clues On Power, Makeup Of Even If Device Was Flawed, Test Crossed A Threshold Weapon Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information. This information includes articles, papers and other documents addressing issues pertinent to US military response options for dealing with nuclear, biological and chemical threats and attacks. It’s our hope this information resource will help enhance your counterproliferation issue awareness. Established in 1998, the USAF/CPC provides education and research to present and future leaders of the Air Force, as well as to members of other branches of the armed services and Department of Defense. Our purpose is to help those agencies better prepare to counter the threat from weapons of mass destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation 4 May 2005
    NPT/CONF.2005/Misc.1 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation 4 May 2005 of Nuclear Weapons Original: English New York, 25 April-May 2005 PROVISIONAL LIST OF PARTICIPANTS (Subject to corrections) ∗ I. STATES PARTIES ALBANIA Address: Permanent Mission of the Republic of Albania to the United Nations 320 East 79th Street, New York, N.Y. 10021 Telephone: (212) 249-2059 Mr. Agim Nesho Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Permanent Representative to the United Nations Head of Delegation Mr. Lublin Dilja Minister Plenipotentiary Permanent Mission Alternate member Mr. Ilir Melo Minister Counselor Permanent Mission Alternate member Ms. Elvina Jusufaj Second Secretary Permanent Mission Alternate member __________________ ∗ Corrections to be submitted to Room S-3140. 05-33749 (E) 090505 *0533749* NPT/CONF.2005/Misc.1 ALGERIA Address: Permanent Mission of Algeria to the United Nations 326 East 48th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017 Telephone: (212) 750-1960 M. Hocine Meghlaoui Secrétaire Général du Ministère des affaires etrangères Chef de la délégation M. Abdallah Baali Ambassadeur Représentant Permanent auprès de l’ONU à New York Membre M. Noureddine Bendjaballah Commissaire à l’Energie Atomique Membre M. Abdelaziz Lahiouel Directeur des Affaires politiques Internationales au MAE Membre M. Mourad Benmehidi Ambassadeur Représentant Permanent Adjoint auprès de l’ONU à New York Membre M. Larbi Alioua Conseiller auprès du Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique Membre M. Mohamed Belaoura Sous-directeur du Désarmement et des Questions de Sécurité Régionale au MAE Membre M. Larbi El Hadj Ali Ministre Plénipotentiaire près la Mission Permanente auprès de l’ONU à New York Membre M.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Official Records Fifty-Sixth Session
    United Nations A/56/PV.65 General Assembly Official Records Fifty-sixth session 65th plenary meeting Tuesday, 27 November 2001, 3 p.m. New York President: Mr. Han Seung-soo ........................................ (Republic of Korea) In the absence of the President, Mr. Ouch (c) Strengthening of international cooperation and (Cambodia), Vice-President, took the Chair. coordination of efforts to study, mitigate and minimize the consequences of the Chernobyl The meeting was called to order at 3.10 p.m. disaster Agenda item 20 (continued) Report of the Secretary-General (A/56/447) Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian (d) Participation of volunteers, “White Helmets”, and disaster relief assistance of the United Nations, in the activities of the United Nations in the including special economic assistance field of humanitarian relief, rehabilitation and technical cooperation for development (a) Strengthening of the coordination of emergency humanitarian assistance of the United Nations Report of the Secretary-General (A/56/308) Reports of the Secretary-General (A/56/95, (e) Assistance to the Palestinian people A/56/307, A/56/384 and Corr.1) Report of the Secretary-General (A/56/123 and Note by the Secretary-General (A/55/649) Corr.1) Mr. Ling (Belarus) (spoke in Russian): The Draft resolution (A/56/L.14) debate under agenda item 20 (c), “Strengthening of international cooperation and coordination of efforts to (b) Special economic assistance to individual study, mitigate and minimize the consequences of the countries or regions Chernobyl disaster”, is taking place during this session of the General Assembly against the background of the Reports of the Secretary-General (A/56/158, fifteenth anniversary of the disaster at the Chernobyl A/56/264, A/56/269, A/56/338, A/56/361, nuclear power plant, a tragedy whose devastating A/56/389, A/56/412, A/56/470 and A/56/632) consequences continue, because of their very specific and long-lasting effects, to adversely affect the Draft resolutions (A/56/L.15, A/56/L.16) development of our country.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée Parlementaire
    Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE MEMBERS OF THE POLITICAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE Secretariat of the Parliamentary Assembly Sub-Committee on External Relations Synopsis N° 2006 / 06 24 October 2006 The Sub-Committee on External Relations (of the Political Affairs Committee) meeting in New York (United States of America) on 19 and 20 October 2006, with Mr Schieder (Austria, SOC) acting as Head of Delegation: - held exchanges of views with: Ambassador Johan L. LOVALD, Permanent Representative of Norway to the UN, Vice- Chairman of the Peace building Commission; Mrs Louise ARBOUR, UN High Commissioner of Human Rights; Mr Jean-Marie GUEHENNO, UN Under-Secretary General for Peacekeeping operations; Ms Angela KANE, UN Assistant Secretary General for Political Affairs; Mr Nicolas MICHEL, UN Under-Secretary General for Legal Affairs; Mr Rashid KHALIKOV, Director, UN Office for Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs; Mr Shashi THAROOR, UN Under-Secretary General for Communications and Public information; Mr Ilya Y. ROGACHEV, Deputy Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations; Ambassador Kenzo OSHIMA, Permanent Representative of Japan to the United Nations, President of the United Nations Security Council; Ambassador Juan Antonio YANEZ-BARNUEVO, Permanent Representative of Spain to the United Nations, Co-Sponsor of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy. cc Secretary General of the Parliamentary Assembly Director General and staff of the Secretariat of the Parliamentary Assembly
    [Show full text]
  • Resolutions and Decisions of the Security Council 1 August 2005
    S/INF/61 Resolutions and Decisions of the Security Council 1 August 2005 – 31 July 2006 Security Council Official Records United Nations • New York, 2006 NOTE The present volume of Resolutions and Decisions of the Security Council contains the resolutions adopted and the decisions taken by the Council on substantive questions during the period from 1 August 2005 to 31 July 2006, as well as decisions on some of the more important procedural matters. The resolutions and decisions are set out in parts I and II, under general headings indicating the questions under consideration. In each part, the questions are arranged according to the date on which they were first taken up by the Council during the period under review, and under each question the resolutions and decisions appear in chronological order. The resolutions are numbered in the order of their adoption. Each resolution is followed by the result of the vote. Decisions are usually taken without a vote. S/INF/61 ISSN 0257-1455 Contents Page Membership of the Security Council in 2005 and 2006 ................................................................................................................. vii Resolutions adopted and decisions taken by the Security Council from 1 August 2005 to 31 July 2006 .............................. 1 Part I. Questions considered by the Security Council under its responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security Reports of the Secretary-General on the Sudan.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Day
    THE JAPAN TIMES MONDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2016 5 United Nations Day A future of greener, cleaner and low-carbon growth Future challenges require growing role, global youth Ban Ki-moon threshold lies our best chance for greener, SECRETARY-GENERAL, THE UNITED NATIONS cleaner, low-carbon growth. Michiru Mekata tries (Japan, Germany, India The U.N. is also in transition, from its SPECIAL TO THE JAPAN TIMES and Brazil) made concerted ef- This year’s observance of eighth secretary-general to the ninth. I forts to reform the U.N. Security United Nations Day occurs have been honored to serve “we the peo- Tis year, Japan is celebrating 60 Council. Te following year at a time of transition for ples” for the past ten years. Together, we years of U.N. membership. On marked the 50th anniversary of the world and for the U.N. have put in place some solid foundations this occasion, U.N. Information Japan joining the U.N. and I have Humanity has entered for shared progress — which we must Centre Director Kaoru Nemoto fond memories of a commemo- the era of sustainability — build on by working even harder to em- met with Kenzo Oshima, a well- rative event, featuring the New with a global commitment power women, engage youth and uphold respected international fgure York Asian Symphony Orches- to fulfil the great promise human rights for all. But we have also suf- who has held senior positions at tra. It provided an opportunity of the 2030 Agenda for fered enormous heartbreak — including top-notch institutions in and for up-and-coming Japanese Sustainable Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Burmese Security Forces and Personnel Implicated in Serious Human Rights Abuses and Accountability Options
    Burmese Security Forces and Personnel Implicated in Serious Human Rights Abuses and Accountability Options (name redacted) Specialist in Asian Affairs Updated October 22, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R45388 SUMMARY R45388 Burmese Security Forces and Personnel October 22, 2018 Implicated in Serious Human Rights Abuses name redacted and Accountability Options Specialist in Asian Affairs [email protected] At least 17 different reports by United Nations (U.N.) entities and independent human rights organizations have been released containing allegations that certain Burmese security force For a copy of the full report, officers and units committed serious human rights violations dating back to 2011. These reports please call 7-.... or visit name nearly 40 individuals and over 100 security units as responsible for such gross human www.crs.gov. rights violations as murder, torture, rape and other forms of sexual violence, and forced labor. Some of these individuals, including Commander-in-Chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, were identified in four or more of the reports. Similarly, some of the security units, in particular Infantry Division 33 and Infantry Division 99, were cited by six or more of the reports. The reports suggest that the commission of human rights abuses by Burma’s security forces is pervasive, systematic, and endemic. CRS did not independently verify the credibility of these reports. The Trump Administration has labeled the alleged human rights violations as “ethnic cleansing” and has imposed “limited targeted sanctions” on five Burmese military officers and two military units it considers responsible for serious human rights violations against the Rohingya in Burma’s Rakhine State.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomacy in Action: Expanding the Un Security Council’S Role in Crisis and Conflict Prevention
    DIPLOMACY IN ACTION: EXPANDING THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL’S ROLE IN CRISIS AND CONFLICT PREVENTION RICHARD GOWAN N Y U CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL C I C COOPERATION May 2017 CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION The world faces old and new security challenges that are more complex than our multilateral and national institutions are currently capable of managing. International cooperation is ever more necessary in meeting these challenges. The NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC) works to enhance international responses to conflict and insecurity through applied research and direct engagement with multilateral institutions and the wider policy community. CIC’s programs and research activities span the spectrum of conflict insecurity issues. This allows us to see critical inter-connections between politics, security, development and human rights and highlight the coherence often necessary for effective response. We have a particular concentration on the UN and multilateral responses to conflict. TABLE OF CONTENTS DIPLOMACY IN ACTION: EXPANDING THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL’S ROLE IN CRISIS AND CONFLICT PREVENTION By Richard Gowan 1. INTRODUCTION: THE SECURITY COUNCIL’S LIMITATIONS 3 2. THE COUNCIL AND CRISIS DIPLOMACY: HISTORICAL PRECEDENTS 5 3. THE COUNCIL AND CRISIS DIPLOMACY: CURRENT SITUATION 8 4. THE SECURITY COUNCIL’S MISSING OPERATIONAL ROLE 12 5. RECOMMENDATIONS: INCREASING THE SECURITY COUNCIL’S OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS 14 ENDNOTES 17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The UN Security Council has the potential to play a greater direct role in crisis response and mediation not only in New York, but in the field. It has done so sporadically in the past. In its early years, the Council experimented with inter-governmental missions to investigate potential conflicts and undertake mediation in cases including the Balkans and Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayors for Peace Newsletter
    ayors for Peace NewsletterMayors for Peace MayorsMayors forfor PeacePeaceNewsletter NewsletterNewsletter Mayors for Peace Secretariat November 30, 2001 / No.16 To Build a 21st Century of Peace and Humanity From August 4 (Sat.) to 9 (Thurs.), the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki hosted the 5th World Conference of Mayors for Peace through Inter-city Solidarity. The theme was, “In order for Humankind to Live through the 21st Century - Toward Reconciliation between Humankind and Science and Technology.” This conference drew 200 participants representing 105 cities in 28 countries and two organizations, who came together to discuss the vast number of nuclear weapons that still threaten us as well as regional conflict, terrorism, hunger and poverty, and global environmental destruction. This year the special focus was on the film and electronic media environment with which our children must contend. Given the Mayor of Hiroshima, Tadatoshi Akiba delivering greetings recognition of myriad forms of violence, active debate ensued at the opening ceremony regarding the elimination of nuclear weapons, promotion of peace education, the peaceful resolution of conflict, and was deemed too long. It was changed to “Mayors for Peace,” preserving the global environment. The Hiroshima and which is shorter and easier to remember. Nagasaki Appeal adopted at the end of the conference The third issue was “an Overall Action Plan.” To make the expressed the results of this discussion. (see page 5). 21st “a century of peace and humanity,” the decision was This conference included 29 cities and 2 organizations taken to strengthen the activities of the Mayors for Peace. from nuclear-weapon states or suspected nuclear-weapon Reflecting the will of the participants, “an Overall Action states, the highest number ever.
    [Show full text]