EARLY CHILDHOOD INDICATORS OF PROGRESS: Minnesota’s Early Learning Standards 2005
FAMILY MEMBERS TEACHERS AND CAREGIVERS COMMUNITY MEMBERS POLICYMAKERS
A framework for understanding and communicating a common set of developmentally appropriate expectations for children in the preschool period of ages three to five, presented within a context of shared responsibility and accountability for helping children meet these expectations BACKGROUND AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Early Childhood Indicators of Progress: Minnesota's Early Learning Standards (2005) is a project of the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) and the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS). The first edition was printed under the title Minnesota Early Childhood Indicators of Progress: A Resource Guide in 2000 by the former Minnesota Department of Children, Families & Learning. An Early Childhood Indicators of Progress Task Force that included early childhood practitioners and members of the Minnesota Association for the Education of Young Children (MNAEYC) and the Min- nesota Association of Early Childhood Teacher Educators (MAECTE) developed it. It was widely reviewed at that time by many individuals representing a diversity of early childhood education and care programs.
This 2005 revision was drafted by an interagency committee working with early childhood consultant Gail Roberts and included: Lisa Backer, MDE, Early Childhood Special Education Karen Carlson, MDE, Early Learning Services Betty Cooke, MDE, Early Childhood Education/Early Childhood Family Education JoAnn Enos, DHS, Child Development Services Barbara O'Sullivan, MDE, Early Childhood Education/School Readiness Debbykay Peterson, MDE, Early Childhood Screening/Kindergarten Sandy Simar, MDE, Head Start Collaboration Deb Swenson-Klatt, DHS, Child Development Services Nancy Wallace, early childhood education consultant and author of the first edition/St. Francis Public Schools The following members of the original Early Childhood Indicators of Progress Task Force received the revised draft to review: Sharon Bahe, St. Paul Public Schools Sandra Benson, St. Francis Public Schools Denise Bryant, Child Care Marilee Christensen-Adams, Anoka-Hennepin Public Schools Lois Engstrom, MDE, Retired Linda Frost, Mankato Public Schools Lynn Galle, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Dan Gartrell, Bemidji State University Sharon Henry-Blythe, Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association Mary Jo Hensel, Lake Crystal-Wellcome Memorial School District Gretchen Irvine, Augsburg College Margie McMahon, White Bear Lake Public Schools Nancy Penn, St. Peter Public Schools Anita Segador Beaton, Metropolitan State University Melissa Shamblott, St. Paul Public Schools Kathy Simonson, Elk River Public Schools Vicki Thrasher Cronin, Ready4K The revised draft was also provided electronically for review and feedback on statewide list serves reaching hundreds of administrators, teachers, and caregivers in the following Minnesota early child- hood education and care programs: Child Care Centers/Family Child Care/Tribal Child Care Child Care Resource and Referral Early Childhood Family Education Early Childhood Screening Early Childhood Special Education/Part C Head Start School Readiness Members of MNAEYC and MAECTE also reviewed it, and MNAEYC passed a resolution in support of it.
Feedback was carefully reviewed by the interagency committee and incorporated into this final edition. The support and contributions of members from the early childhood education associations, staff from early childhood education and care programs, and many others who reviewed and provided feedback on this document are gratefully acknowledged. EARLY CHILDHOOD INDICATORS OF PROGRESS: Minnesota’s Early Learning Standards
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Potential Uses 4 Organization and Structure of Document 10 Early Childhood Indicators of Progress Domain Framework 11 Social and Emotional Development 13 Emotional Development 14 Self-Concept 16 Social Competence and Relationships 18 Approaches to Learning 19 Curiosity 20 Risk-Taking 22 Imagination and Invention 24 Persistence 26 Reflection and Interpretation 28 Language and Literacy Development 29 Listening 30 Speaking 32 Emergent Reading 34 Emergent Writing 36 Creativity and the Arts 37 Creating 38 Responding 40 Evaluating 42 Cognitive Development 43 Mathematical and Logical Thinking 44 Scientific Thinking and Problem-Solving 46 Social Systems Understanding 48 Physical and Motor Development 49 Gross Motor Development 50 Fine Motor Development 52 Physical Health and Well-Being 54 Early Childhood Indicators of Progress: Minnesota’s Early Learning Standards 55 Reference List 58 Additional Resources 60 EARLY CHILDHOOD INDICATORS OF PROGRESS: Minnesota’s Early Learning Standards
PURPOSE The primary purpose of this docu- ment is to provide a framework for understanding and communicating a common set of developmentally appropriate expectations for young children within a context of shared responsibility and accountability for helping children meet these expecta- tions.
The document was developed with five goals in mind: INTRODUCTION 1. To increase understanding of all areas of a child's development A large and growing body of research and to recommend strategies for supports the critical relationship supporting optimum development. between early childhood experiences and successful learning outcomes. 2. To expand understanding of the The responsibility for providing sup- multiple influences on the port systems and resources that education and life success of result in positive outcomes for young young children. children is a shared one. Families, early childhood teachers and care- 3. To support families by providing givers, community members, and pol- examples of strategies that icymakers all contribute to the well- facilitate and enhance children's being of children. development.
The Early Childhood Indicators of 4. To provide teachers, caregivers, Progress document recognizes the and administrators in early importance of this shared responsibili- childhood education and care ty and accountability in order to programs and settings with a achieve positive outcomes for chil- common conceptual framework dren. This document stresses the and guidelines for planning importance of collective efforts among curriculum, instruction, and families, early childhood education assessment of young children. and care, communities, and policy- makers in supporting the learning and 5. To provide a resource for development of children. The efforts community members and of each and every one of these policymakers to use in assessing groups are vital in the process of the impact of current policies and developing healthy, well-functioning resources on the optimal children. development of young children. 1 These goals are consistent with The Early Childhood Indicators of Strategies community members and reports from several national groups Progress were initially written in 2000 policymakers can use to promote and studying the development of state- and have been systematically support children's development are level early learning standards reviewed and revised using recently also included for each domain. These (NAEYC & NAECS/SDE, 2002; Scott- developed guidelines related to child strategies for community members Little, Kagan, & Frelow, 2003a; outcome standards (NAEYC & and policymakers are repeated for Shore, Bodrova, & Leong, 2004). NAECS/SDE, 2002; Shore, Bodrova, each component within a domain. Early learning standards express & Leong, 2004). The following criteria, shared expectations for young chil- based on national reviews (Scott-Lit- THE EARLY CHILDHOOD dren's learning and provide a com- tle, Kagan, & Frelow, 2003b, 2003c; mon language for measuring Neuman & Roskos, 2004), were used DEVELOPMENTAL PERIOD progress toward achieving these for the inclusion of specific indicators: The early childhood period of growth goals (Kendall, 2003; Kagan & Scott- and development spans the years Little, 2004). Research emphasizes 1. Research-based - Indicators are from birth to age eight (Bredekamp & the importance of brain development reasonably achievable and age- Copple, 1997). The Early Childhood and the early years for later develop- appropriate. Indicators of Progress are intended ment and learning (Shonkoff & as a guide for children in the pre- Phillips, 2000; Hyson, 2003). 2. Clearly written - Indicators are school period of ages three to five. Researchers have concluded that clear and coherent as to what The indicators are based on widely "Young children are more capable preschool-age children should held developmental expectations learners than current practices reflect, know and be able to do. observed in a child at approximately and good educational experiences in four years of age. It is expected that the preschool years can have a posi- 3. Measurable - Indicators reflect most children will meet the majority of tive impact on school learning" (Bow- observable behaviors, concepts, these expectations by the end of the man, Donovan, & Burns, 2000, p.2). and skills. pre-kindergarten year. Because nor- mal development varies greatly from 4. Comprehensive - Indicators child to child, the Early Childhood ORGANIZATION cover all domains of development Indicators of Progress document is AND STRUCTURE and provide sufficient breadth intended to be used as a flexible and depth of each area of guide in describing a child's individual The Early Childhood Indicators of development. progress. Progress document is divided into six domains that reflect the full range of 5. Manageable - There are a Child development progresses differ- child development as recommended reasonable number of indicators in ently for every individual child. Chil- by national guidelines (Kagan, Moore, each domain to comprehend. dren are influenced by their distinct & Bredekamp, 1995): experiences with the diverse values 6. Applicable - Indicators are and practices of their family, their cul- Social and Emotional broadly applicable to children from ture, and their community (National Development diverse linguistic, economic, and Association for the Education of Approaches to Learning cultural backgrounds and to Young Children, 1996). For these Language and Literacy children with variations in reasons, although children develop in Development developmental needs and abilities generally similar stages, their individ- Creativity and the Arts in different early childhood settings. ual life experiences are reflected in Cognitive Development greatly diverse patterns of behavior Physical and Motor Development Strategies that family members and and learning. Such individual differ- teachers and caregivers in early ences are normal and must be Each domain is further divided into childhood education and care pro- respected in order for children to three to five components that grams and settings can use to facili- maintain a sense of self-worth. designate areas of children's tate children's development are listed development within each domain. for each component. The strategies Indicators of children's progress in for family members and teachers and gaining concepts, knowledge, and caregivers are not intended to be all- skills within each component inclusive, but rather provide suggest- are then specified. ed learning activities to enhance children's development.
2 A NEW APPROACH The Early Childhood Indicators of Progress: Minnesota's Early Learning Standards provide a unique approach in the movement toward increased accountability. Especially at the early childhood level, children's develop- ment must be considered within the context of the family, early childhood education and care, and the commu- nity. These systems, along with poli- cymakers, share a role in being accountable for the optimal develop- ment of young children. The Early The Early Childhood Indicators of Childhood Indicators of Progress Progress are written intentionally to underscore the importance of shared include both typically and atypically responsibility and shared accountabil- developing children. Children with dis- ity for optimal development in terms abilities will make progress on the of both learning opportunities and knowledge, concepts, and skills that outcomes for children. By emphasiz- are described by the indicators, with ing the necessity for collaboration expected variations for each child. among families, early childhood edu- Recommendations for serving chil- cation and care, communities, and dren with special needs in inclusive policymakers, this document sug- early childhood settings are reflected gests that everyone must work in the suggested learning strategies together. This must be done in an (Sandall, McLean, & Smith, 2000). interdependent way if all children are to have optimal opportunities for The development of Minnesota's learning and development. Underlying Early Childhood Indicators of this work is the belief that only when Progress was informed by the follow- all stakeholders are both individually ing Guiding Principles, which are and collectively responsible and based on child development accountable for the learning and research: development of young children will all of Minnesota's children experience Young children are capable and achieve success. and competent. Development occurs in predictable patterns. Children are individuals who develop at different rates. Many factors influence a child's development. Children exhibit a range of skills and competencies within any domain of development. Expectations for children must be guided by knowledge of child growth and development. Young children learn through play, interaction with others, and active exploration of their environment. Families are children's first and most important caregivers and educators. 3 EARLY CHILDHOOD INDICATORS Minnesota’s Early OF PROGRESS: Learning Standards
POTENTIAL USES The Early Childhood Indicators of Progress: Minnesota's Early Learning Standards is to be used as a resource for family members, teachers and caregivers, community members, and policymakers in ways that are sup- portive of young children's develop- ment. Since the publication of the first edition in 2000, many individuals and groups from across the state have used the indicator document in many of the ways described in this section.
4 TO BUILD AWARENESS OF THE SYSTEMS NEEDED TO SUPPORT THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN Parents are the best advocates for their children. This document can be used to make concrete connections between actions by people and the quality of life for children and families. Parents can use strategies listed in this document to offer suggestions and promote various projects and activities within their communities. The document can also provide guid- ance to parents about what to look for as they choose programs for their young children.
FOR FAMILY MEMBERS FOR TEACHERS AND CAREGIVERS TO BUILD AWARENESS OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT The Early Childhood Indicators of TO GUIDE PLANNING Progress can be used to help parents FOR CURRICULUM CONTENT develop new ways of viewing their AND TEACHING STRATEGIES child's development. Many teachers The Early Childhood Indicators of and caregivers have summarized or Progress provide a common frame- adapted sections of the document for work for developmentally appropriate use with parents and family members. expectations for children who are One way this has been done is to approximately four years of age. It is develop a series of parent tip cards for expected that most children will specific domains with an emphasis on accomplish the majority of the indica- the strategies family members can tors by the end of the pre-kindergarten use to support their child's develop- year. In order to meet this expectation, ment (Minnesota Department of the indicators can be used as a guide Education, 2004b). for planning curriculum content and teaching strategies for children in the TO INVOLVE FAMILIES preschool period of ages three to five. IN LEARNING A high level of family involvement is The indicators provide a common lan- an indicator of a high quality program. guage for use across programs. A Children benefit when family members common language and framework are invited to participate in ongoing facilitates discussion and collaboration communication about what is happen- among home visitors, home-based ing in their child's early childhood edu- caregivers, school and center-based cation and care through discussions staff, and others. The domains and with caregivers, parent-teacher con- indicators included are consistent with ferences, open houses, parent-child the national Head Start Child Out- activity times, parent education, transi- comes Framework (Head Start tion-to-kindergarten sessions, and vol- Bureau, 2003). The use of the indica- unteer opportunities. Information tors can help programs align curricu- about widely held developmental lum, instruction, and assessment with expectations can be shared with par- both state and national outcome stan- ents during these times (Meisels, dards and guidelines (NAEYC & Marsden, & Stetson, 2000). Families NAECS/SDE, 2003). who are engaged in their child's edu- cation are better able to support their child's learning and development (Mueller, 2003). 5 Individual teachers and caregivers Fair to all cultures, language Examples of authentic assessments can develop curriculum with the indi- groups, and developmental levels include the Work Sampling System of cators in mind and plan assessment Reflect real-world classroom or Child Assessment, the Child Observa- appropriate to their setting and related family contexts tion Record, and the Creative Curricu- to the indicators. Teachers and care- Tied to children's daily activities lum Assessment System. The Work givers can focus their curriculum on and assess children's actual Sampling System is a curriculum- significant learning experiences to performance embedded, teacher-guided assess- support the concepts, knowledge, and Done in natural settings and ment that emphasizes the collection of skills described by the indicators. In situations that are non-threatening multiple sources of documentation this way, teachers and caregivers are to the child over time. The system involves the not locked into a set curriculum, but Inclusive of families and responsive child, family, teacher, or caregiver in rather can design activities within par- to cultural and linguistic variations the ongoing process of assessment ticular domains that will give children Use multiple sources of information and reporting (Meisels & Atkins-Bur- opportunities to practice the concepts, on multiple occasions nett, 2002; Dichtelmiller, Jablon, Dorf- knowledge, and skills identified by the Insure continuity and consistency man, Marsden, & Meisels, 2001). indicators. over time Supported by ongoing professional The Child Observation Record (COR) Each child's culture and language development to ensure skilled evaluates children's behavior during background, developmental level, observation and assessment normal learning activities and assess- learning style, and personal interests es broad areas of child development. must be taken into account as learn- In addition, assessment should bring Teachers and caregivers use the ing experiences are implemented about benefits for children, be con- observational records to report to fam- (Bredekamp & Rosegrant, 1992; Cop- nected to specific purposes, and value ilies and to create individual plans for ple, 2003). This approach to curricu- parents as sources and audiences for children (Schweinhart, 1993; lum supports exploration, innovation, assessment (Shepard, Kagan, & High/Scope, 1992). and individualization within a setting Wurtz, 1998). as opposed to a prescribed curriculum The Creative Curriculum approach (Bredekamp & Rosegrant, 1995). The Components of authentic assessment uses an assessment that includes framework promotes diversity and include: observation, observation teacher or caregiver observations and equity in terms of what children do, checklists, rating scales, portfolios, a checklist based on a developmental how children show what they know, and summary reports. These compo- continuum. This approach empha- and what constitutes success. nents may be used individually or in sizes the integration of curriculum and combination depending upon the assessment through teacher or care- desired purposes of the assessment giver planning and implementation. TO PROVIDE DIRECTION information. Observation includes the Parents are involved through confer- FOR AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT gathering and recording of information ences and the sharing of reports OF YOUNG CHILDREN by noting facts or occurrences of chil- (Dodge, Colker, & Heroman, 2002). The indicators can help teachers and dren's skills, abilities, and behaviors caregivers define the kinds of things (Jablon, Dombro, & Dichtelmiller, young children need to know and be 1999). Observational checklists, when TO PROVIDE A FRAMEWORK able to do. Once those are articulated, combined with observation notes and FOR PROGRAM STANDARDS teachers and caregivers need to con- samples of children's work, provide AND PROGRAM EVALUATION sider how to collect evidence of chil- reliable ways to understand growth Staff within early childhood education dren's learning through authentic and development of skills and behav- and care programs and settings can assessment. iors over time (Helm, Beneke, & use the Early Childhood Indicators of Steinheimer, 1998). Progress to frame questions for meet- Authentic assessment practices are ing program standards and conduct- those that are based on everyday One of the primary purposes of ing program evaluation. High quality learning experiences, provide for actu- assessment is to inform instruction programming provides opportunities al child performance, and involve chil- and help teachers and caregivers that support each child's developmen- dren in the evaluation process make decisions concerning children's tal stage and need to engage in play, (NAEYC & NAECS/SDE, 2003; San- subsequent learning experiences. In exploration, and active learning. tos, 2004; McAfee, Leong, & Bodrova, that way, a continuous cycle of plan- 2004). Authentic assessment methods ning, implementing, and evaluating for children should meet these criteria: children's learning experiences helps ensure that children are challenged appropriately to develop the concepts, knoweldge, and skills needed to reach their full potential. 6 Accreditation processes such as those established by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) and the National Association of Family Child Care (NAFCC) help assure that high quality standards are present. The NAEYC program standards specify ten areas for program evaluation: relationships, curriculum, teaching, assessment, health, teachers, family involvement, community partner- ships, physical environment, and leadership and management (National Association for the Educa- tion of Young Children, 2004). Spe- cific indicators in each of these ten areas are assessed as part of the accreditation procedures. The A first set of questions centers on the NAFCC process sets and assesses types of resources, activities, and standards for health, safety, and learning experiences provided. The personal and professional develop- requirements for the services children ment for family child care providers receive are generally referred to as (National Association of Family program standards. Program stan- Child Care, 1999). dards provide criteria for important program features such as adult-child A second set of questions about ratios, group sizes, teacher or caregiv- program evaluation focuses on the er qualifications, and curriculum actions staff take as they interact (Scott-Little, Kagan, & Frelow, 2003a). with other groups and programs Four major variables that impact within the community. These desired program outcomes are the inquiries lead to information about learning environment, interpersonal linkages to other agencies or relationships, daily schedules and rou- programs and the development of tine, and materials and activities common goals and expectations for (Harms, Clifford, & Cryer, 1998). children in the community. These components interact to support the desired learning opportunities and outcomes for children. The best pro- TO PROVIDE IDEAS gramming considers all of these vari- FOR STAFF TRAINING ables when planning, teaching, and AND DEVELOPMENT evaluating effectiveness. Teachers and caregivers can benefit not only from a concise framework The Head Start Program Performance of child development as provided in Standards provide a sound foundation this document, but also from an for achieving positive child outcomes understanding of how what they do (Head Start Bureau, 2004). The Head in early childhood settings impacts Start Program Performance Stan- child outcomes and school readi- dards provide for all aspects of early ness. A related document, Minneso- childhood development, health servic- ta Core Competencies, defines core es, family and community partner- competencies for teachers and care- ships, and program design and man- givers who work with young children agement. Child outcome information (Minnesota Association for the Edu- for groups of children becomes part of cation of Young Children, 2004). the data used to determine how well The Core Competencies describe programs are doing in meeting overall expectations for what the adults who goals and objectives.
7 work with young children need to Business leaders and employers are FOR POLICYMAKERS know and be able to do, similar to key players in helping communities the way these early learning stan- focus on the importance of early TO ASSESS THE IMPACT dards, the Early Childhood Indica- childhood education and care for the OF PUBLIC POLICIES tors of Progress, describe expecta- future economic development of the ON YOUNG CHILDREN tions for what young children need community (Committee for Econom- AND THEIR FAMILIES to know and be able to do. Teachers ic Development Research and Poli- Policymakers can use the Early and caregivers can identify any cy Committee, 2002; Rolnick & Childhood Indicators of Progress as number of areas in the Early Child- Grunewald, 2003). Community a reference for assessing the impact hood Indicators of Progress and members can also use county-by- of policy decisions on the lives of Core Competencies documents county information on key indicators children and their families. By pro- where they may need further infor- to assess how well their local com- viding consistent and reliable sup- mation and training. Some of these munity is doing in providing opportu- port and resources to families, a areas could include authentic nities for the healthy development of larger proportion of families with assessment, curriculum develop- young children (Kids Count, 2004). young children can participate in ment, teaching strategies and best opportunities that enhance learning practices in instruction, and program TO HELP ORGANIZE and development. Prevention and evaluation. They might also include ADVOCACY EFFORTS early intervention efforts to make advocacy with the community and WITHIN THE COMMUNITY sure that all children get a strong with policymakers, communication This document can be useful in and healthy start help reduce the with parents, and parent education helping various groups see the con- likelihood that children will need and involvement. tinuity of their efforts across home more intensive and costly help at a and program settings where there later age (Sandall, McLean, & Many of the institutions of higher are young children. This document Smith, 2000; Rolnick & Grunewald, education in Minnesota also use the provides concrete connections 2003). Early Childhood Indicators of between healthy child development Progress to help ensure that teach- and access to resources within the There are a number of ways to ers and caregivers enrolled in early community. Community members assess public policies and impacts. childhood education and related and policymakers can help assure State-level evaluation studies have courses understand these widely the optimal learning and develop- assessed the readiness of children held developmental expectations for ment of young children by making a for school (Minnesota Department of young children and the implications commitment to support early child- Education, 2003 & 2004a). Other for curriculum, instruction, and hood education and care efforts approaches provide ongoing assessment. (Child Trends, 2001; Committee for assessment, such as the state-by- Economic Development Research state profiles of child well-being pre- and Policy Committee, 2002). Com- pared annually and reported in the FOR COMMUNITY munities can support and strengthen Kids Count Data Book (Annie E. MEMBERS the resources available to support Casey Foundation, 2004). families with young children and TO PROVIDE A FRAMEWORK build stronger connections among FOR NEEDS ASSESSMENT the various programs and services WITHIN THE COMMUNITY that impact children's lives. The Early Childhood Indicators of Progress can serve as a guide for identifying the sources of support within the community that encour- age the healthy growth and develop- ment of young children. Community resources such as early childhood centers, family child care homes, playgrounds, libraries, recreational centers, and elementary schools all work together to contribute to chil- dren's development (National Asso- ciation of State Boards of Education, 1991).
8 TO IMPROVE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF APPROPRIATE EXPECTATIONS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND RESPONSIBILITY The Early Childhood Indicators of Progress enhance understanding of widely held developmental expecta- tions for young children from three to five years of age, along with the types of activities that provide meaningful learning experiences. Appropriate ways of documenting and assessing the performance and progress of young children should also be consid- ered (Shore, Bodrova, & Leong, 2004). The document provides a comprehensive framework for shared accountability and responsibility for children's development.
CONCLUSION Because a child's first and most important learning occurs in the con- text of the family, it is essential that families have the supports and resources needed to help their chil- dren develop in optimal ways. Fami- lies are better able to care for, nurture, and help their children succeed if early childhood teachers and care- givers, community members, and poli- cymakers share in the collective com- mitment to foster healthy development of all young children.
9 EARLY Minnesota’s Early Learning Standards CHILDHOOD INDICATORS Organization and Structure OF PROGRESS: of Document The Early Childhood Indicators of Progress: Minnesota’s Early Learning Stan- dards are intended to provide a framework for understanding and communicat- ing a common set of developmentally appropriate expectations for young chil- dren within a context of shared responsibility and accountability for helping chil- dren meet these expectations. It is divided into six domains that reflect the full range of child development as listed in the center box below:
Each domain is further divided into three to five components that describe indi- cators of children’s progress in gaining concepts, knowledge, and skills. (See domain components on next page.) Strategies family members and teachers and caregivers in early childhood education and care programs can use to faci- itate children’s development are listed for each component. The lists of strate- gies for family members and teachers and caregivers are not intended to be all- inclusive, but rather provide suggested learning activities for enhancing chil- dren’s development. Strategies community members and policymakers can use to promote children’s development are also included for each domain. The strategies for community members and policymakers are repeated for each component within a domain.
The Early Childhood Indicators of Progress are intended to be used as a guide for children in the preschool period of ages 3 to 5. The indicators are based on widely held developmental expectations observed in a child approximately four years of age. It is expected that most children will meet the majority of these expectations by the end of the pre-kindergarten year. Because normal develop- ment varies greatly from child to child, the Early Childhood Indicators of Progress document is intended to be a flexible guide in describing a child’s individual progress. 10 EARLY CHILDHOOD INDICATORS OF PROGRESS: Minnesota’s Early Learning Standards
Early Childhood
DOMAINS: SOCIAL & EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
DOMAIN Emotional Development COMPONENTS: Self-Concept
Social Competence and Relationships
11 Indicators of Progress Domain Framework
APPROACHES LANGUAGE & CREATIVITY COGNITIVE PHYSICAL & TO LEARNING LITERACY & THE ARTS DEVELOPMENT MOTOR DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT
Curiosity Listening Creating Mathematical and Gross Motor Logical Thinking Development Risk-Taking Speaking Responding - Number Concepts and Operations Fine Motor Imagination and Emergent Reading Evaluating - Patterns and Development Invention Relationships Emergent Writing Physical Health - Spatial Relationships/ Persistence and Well-Being Geometry Reflection and - Measurement Interpretation - Mathematical Reasoning
Scientific Thinking and Problem-Solving - Observing - Questioning - Investigating
Social Systems Understanding - Human Relationships - Understanding the World
12 DOMAIN I: Social and Emotional Development
This domain involves children’s feelings about themselves, as well as their interactions and relationships with peers and Respond to children’s emotional and physical adults. Included in this focus needs with warmth and reassurance are indicators that refer to Establish predictable family routines while being children’s views of themselves flexible to meet children’s needs as learners and their sense of Encourage children to talk about their feelings responsibility to themselves and the feelings of others and others. Particularly Positively reinforce children in coping important in this domain are constructively with frustration and conflict the skills children demonstrate Model appropriate conflict resolution strategies making friends, solving both verbally and nonverbally conflicts, and functioning Provide children with practice in thinking of effectively in groups. solutions and anticipating consequences Help children identify and understand emotions they feel