DOCSLIB.ORG

Excellence Together

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Excellence Together Excellence Together Hastings School, Madrid, Spain Cognita was founded in 2004 with a single school in the United Kingdom and a clear INDIVIDUAL vision for what defines teaching excellence. Since then, our Group has grown to over INTERNATIONAL 60 schools in seven countries and thanks to the efforts of our talented educators and COLLABORATIVE support staff, we have helped thousands of students achieve more than they believed possible. Providing excellent teaching and IMPROVEMENT supporting every student to achieve his or her full potential are the cornerstones of ACHIEVEMENT a Cognita education. We are proud of the diversity of our schools and we continue EXCELLENCE to celebrate and preserve the qualities that make each one special. Likewise, we are proud of our students, who work BILINGUAL hard to achieve the results that enable them to enter some of the world’s leading MODERN universities. As William Yeats once said, education is not the filling of a pail, but HERITAGE the lighting of a fire, so we will continue to inspire our educators to light the fire of TOGETHER learning in our students. Rees Withers WE ARE Chief Executive COGNITA Stamford American International School, Singapore School, International American Stamford INDIVIDUAL 01 INDIVIDUAL More than 60 schools in seven countries, yet no two are the same. More than 30,000 children in our care, yet every one of them is unique. Supporting the uniqueness of our schools, and the individuality of There is a common focus in our schools: to our students, is central to Cognita’s purpose. It is just as important provide a high-quality education firmly rooted today as it was when we began our journey with our very first school in the principles of building excellence and in 2004. We have more than 4,500 teaching and support staff seeking continuous improvement. working in our schools and offices, each bringing a different and We support and challenge children to valuable perspective. achieve more than they believe they can. That means our teachers are highly attuned Each school that chooses to join our Group has something unique to to the needs and capabilities of each offer, something parents value and cherish. That is why every Cognita individual child and able to personalise school, whether in Brazil, Chile, Singapore, Spain, Thailand, Vietnam or learning accordingly so that every student the UK, retains its own unique ethos, with curricula and programmes achieves his or her full potential. tailored to the needs of the parents and children it serves. St. Andrews International School, Sukhumvit 107, Bangkok, Thailand Bangkok, 107, Sukhumvit School, International Andrews St. INTERNATIONAL 02 INTERNATIONAL Today, Cognita is a truly international operator, with a growing family of schools in Asia, Europe and Latin America. From our early foundations in the UK, we have extended not only our students in our schools in Singapore, Thailand geographical reach, but also the range of curricula and education and Vietnam to develop their teamwork and programmes that our schools offer. leadership skills through regular sporting competitions both within the Asia region and International reach means an international outlook, and there is a strong further afield. Such opportunities broaden the focus within our schools on languages and on teaching that encourages experience and outlook of our students and students to embrace a global mindset. Cognita’s educators deliver a range teachers whilst offering an exciting way to build of internationally renowned curricula such as the International Baccalaureate linguistic, social and cultural skills. (IB) as well as the national curricula of leading education markets such as England and Wales, Australia and the United States of America. Indeed, a number of our schools offer multiple curricula as well as bilingual and trilingual programmes. We harness the diversity of our Group to enhance the learning opportunities for our students and teachers alike. ExPro, Cognita’s Exchange Programme, creates tailored international academic and cultural exchanges between our schools. The Cognita Asia Sports Association (CASA) encourages King’s School, Plymouth, United Kingdom United Plymouth, School, King’s COLLABORATIVE 03 COLLABORATIVE Together, we are stronger — more aligned and more effective. We capitalise on the diversity of practice and expertise within our global family. By encouraging constant dialogue between peers and between schools, we share best practice, which in turn raises standards and leads to the strongest possible outcomes for students. For Cognita, the relationship between each of our schools and its parent community is of paramount importance, as we believe in parents as co-partners in the education of their children and that strong collaborations of this kind are a major factor in high student attainment. For this reason, we ensure that each of our schools makes a firm commitment to listen to and act upon parent feedback in order to support continuous improvement, and we back this commitment through our Group-wide parent feedback programme ‘Help Us Grow’. Our approach to collaboration extends beyond the boundaries of our Group, and this is reflected in the strong tradition of philanthropy and volunteering within our schools. Together, Cognita schools raised over £175,000 for charitable projects between 2012 and 2014, a common theme being support for education and children in less fortunate circumstances. To provide more impact from these endeavours, Cognita became a corporate partner of the worldwide non-profit organisation The Global Fund for Children, which supports grassroots projects that help children to thrive, even in the most challenging circumstances. Such engagement with the wider world is a key way in which we develop our students’ understanding of themselves as global citizens. Downsend School, Surrey, United Kingdom United Surrey, School, Downsend IMPROVEMENT 04 IMPROVEMENT We don’t believe in standing still. We develop and improve the schools that join our Group. Cognita takes a systematic approach to raising standards because we understand Because we are a group, we are able how important academic rigour and student achievement are to the parents who to create professional development choose our schools. To ensure that our students achieve the strongest possible opportunities for teachers and their outcomes, we use external testing systems and a common framework to assess leaders that simply are not available in student potential and progress and to predict future grades. This allows our teachers standalone schools, such as internal to tailor the teaching for each student and create an individualised learning plan that conferences and specialist training to provides the correct challenge and support for each child. We monitor the impact fund postgraduate qualifications and our teachers have in helping students to achieve beyond expectation by setting them school management programmes for targets for their own teaching performance and professional development. our future school leaders. We also seek to enhance the quality of provision in our schools through targeting capital investments to meet specific school improvement and development objectives, be that investing in classroom infrastructure, sports facilities or technology such as one-to-one iPad programmes. We also invest in our teachers and school leaders through training and professional development programmes to enhance their pedagogical capabilities. ACHIEVEMENT We are proud of the achievements of Cognita schools and the students in our care. ACHIEVEMENT The high level of attainment in public examinations, from A Level to International Baccalaureate, Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank to Chile’s Prueba de Selección Universitaria (university selection test), reflects the commitment of our 05students and their teachers. Key curricula examinations such as these are, for many parents, the ultimate measure of academic quality, and our schools’ results are well above the relevant national or regional benchmarks. It’s no surprise then, that the students graduating from Cognita schools have high university acceptance rates. Destinations of recent Cognita graduates include the following top 100-ranked institutions*: Brown University University College London (UCL) Columbia University University of Bristol Cornell University University of British Columbia Duke University University of California, Berkeley Durham University University of California, Irvine Erasmus University Rotterdam University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) University of Cambridge Hong Kong University of Science and Technology University of Edinburgh Imperial College London University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign King’s College London University of Manchester Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) University of Melbourne London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) University of Michigan Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) University of Oxford McGill University University of Pittsburgh Michigan State University University of Queensland, Australia Monash University University of Southern California New York University (NYU) University of Sydney Pennsylvania State University University of Toronto Stanford University University of York Tufts University Yale University *Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2013-2014 IB Curriculum Average Diploma Point Scores 40 35 30 25 20 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Cognita
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Framework for Measuring Australian Higher
    A FRAMEWORK FOR MEASURING EQUITY PERFORMANCE IN AUSTRALIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Draft Framework Document V1.6 Tim Pitman and Paul Koshy, November 2014 Make tomorrow better. ncsehe.edu.au A Framework for Measuring Equity Performance in Australian Higher Education – Draft Framework Document Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 8 2. Overview of the Equity Performance Framework for Australian Higher Education ........ 10 Tier 1: Context (Pre-higher education) ............................................................................................ 11 Tier 2: Performance (Higher education) .......................................................................................... 12 Tier 3: Outcome (Post-higher education) ....................................................................................... 12 Comparisons by State and Territory ................................................................................................ 13 Comparisons with the General
    [Show full text]
  • The Evaluation of the Adult Migrant English Program (AMEP) “New Business Model”
    AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL OF TESOL ASSOCIATIONS SUBMISSION TO The Evaluation of the Adult Migrant English Program (AMEP) “new business model” March-April 2019 CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 RECOMMENDATIONS 9 Introduction 13 1. The goals of the Adult Migrant English Program (AMEP) 14 2. The goals of the Skills for Employment and Education (SEE) Program 16 3. Where does the AMEP belong? 18 4. Targeted Tuition Streams (requirement 1a) 20 4.1 Rationale 20 4.2 Overlap between the AMEP pre-employment stream and the SEE Program 23 4.3 ACTA Recommendations on streaming in the AMEP 23 5. Extra tuition hours - the Special Preparatory Program (SPP) and AMEP Extend (requirements 1b & c) 23 5.1 The SPP 23 5.2 AMEP Extend 26 6. Assessment – use of the Australian Core Skills Framework (ACSF) as a benchmark and to align the AMEP and SEE Program (requirements 1e and 4) 28 6.1 The stated rationale for mandating the ACSF 28 6.2 The ACIL Allen recommendation 29 6.3 The ACSF as “a tool for measuring language proficiency” 31 6.3.1 The ACSF: is it reliable? Implications for its role as the basis for a KPI 32 6.3.2 The ACSF: is it a valid tool for assessing English language proficiency and progress? 34 6.4 The ISLPR 38 6.5 The ACSF – facilitating greater [sic] pathways between the AMEP and other training programs and the tertiary education sector 41 6.6 Use of the ACSF in aligning the AMEP and SEE Program 43 7. Performance management (requirement 1f) 46 7.1 Engagement 47 7.1.1 Continuous enrolment/rolling intakes 47 7.1.2 Monitoring attendance and accounting for absences.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory Department of Education Submission
    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Northern Territory Department of Education Submission Inquiry into the Education of Students in Remote and Complex Environments The Northern Territory (NT) Department of Education seeks to provide a submission to the inquiry into the education of students in remote and complex environments, commissioned by the Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Training. The submission aims to highlight the unique circumstances experienced by students in NT remote and very remote communities and how the department is adapting its service delivery, using innovative approaches, to meet their needs. The NT Government recognises the critical role of culture, family, community and country in delivering better outcomes, particularly for Aboriginal people. There are a number of initiatives underway that target these core factors while balancing the complexities of delivering government services in remote and very remote communities. Remote and very remote Territory context The NT is the most remote jurisdiction in Australia, with approximately 245 000 people spread across one sixth of Australia’s land mass. Over 40 per cent of the population is considered to live in remote or very remote areas. The overwhelming majority of residents living in remote communities are Aboriginal Territorians, with a much younger population on average than other parts of Australia. Unemployment is high and there are significant health issues. Fifty-four per cent of remote households and 12 per cent of very remote communities speak English in the home. Most children attending school in remote or very remote communities only speak English at school, not in their community or in their home. The transitional nature of community life, and movement of families between communities can be disruptive to a child’s education, particularly when this movement occurs across multiple jurisdictions, such as the NT, Western Australia and South Australia borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing the Australian School History Curriculum: Ideology, High Politics and the History Wars in the Howard Years
    Chapter 2 Constructing the Australian School History Curriculum: Ideology, High Politics and the History Wars in the Howard Years Tony Taylor This chapter is a substantially revised and expanded version of a keynote address “Disputed Territory: Who Owns History in Schools?” given at the Australian National University Research School of Social Sciences’ conference “Governing by looking back” 12–14 December (2007). The relevant official government papers for the summit, including an edited transcript of proceedings, have been archived on the Department of Employment Education and Workplace Relations website at http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/ policy_initiatives_reviews/key_issues/Australian_History/ (as at July 2009) 2.1 Background to Policy and History Curriculum In 1996, a Liberal/National conservative coalition was victorious in the Australian March general election and coalition leader, John Howard, became the nation’s 25th prime minister. Howard’s accession, bolstered by a large majority, came following his own long and difficult political apprenticeship and after 13 years of Labour federal government. Although focused throughout his next three administrations on the big political issue including race relations, immigration policy, Middle East conflict, privatisation and industrial relations, Howard still kept time for history, which, after small beginnings, began to loom increasingly large in the prime minister’s con- sciousness. This incipient public attention to history began in 1996 in his Sir Thomas Playford memorial speech where he accused “cultural dieticians in our midst” of attempting to “rewrite Australian history in the service of a partisan political cause.”1 His comments were aimed at academics and others who favoured what had already been referred to by conservatively inclined historian Geoffrey Blainey as the “black armband” view of Australia’s past.
    [Show full text]
  • International Comparative Study: the Australian Curriculum and the Singapore Curriculum
    INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE STUDY: THE AUSTRALIAN CURRICULUM AND THE SINGAPORE CURRICULUM © Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) 2018 This work is copyright. You may only download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal non-commercial educational use or non-commercial educational use within your organisation. All other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: ACARA Copyright Administration Level 10 255 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 [email protected] 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................4 1 PROGRAM OF RESEARCH .............................................................8 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 8 2 CONTEXTUAL DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS ........................... 14 2.1 Preamble ......................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Demographic comparison: Australia and Singapore ........................................................ 15 2.3 Curriculum design principles and purpose ....................................................................... 31 2.3.1 Education Policy ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Navitas Submission
    Submission: Draft National Strategy for International Education About Navitas Navitas Ltd is an Australian global education partner providing pre-university and university programs, English language courses, migrant education and settlement services, creative media education, student recruitment, professional development and corporate training services to more than 80,000 students across a network of over 120 colleges and campuses in 27 countries. Navitas listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) in 2004 and is now an S&P/ASX Top 100 Company, employing more than 5,800 staff globally. General comments Navitas commends the Government for: Responding positively to, and adopting, all the recommendations of the report of the International Education Advisory Council, chaired by Michael Chaney AO, Australia – Educating Globally. Recognising the critical importance of international education to Australia, developing a national vision, strategy and approach, and establishing ‘a ministerially led coordinating council for international education’. Developing a 10-year market development strategy, Australia International Education 2025, to inform, support and focus investment and actions in delivering on the national strategy. Consulting with the international education sector, business and industry, and communities on the development of the strategies and their implementation. Navitas welcomes the support given by various levels of government to international and transnational education, and the recognition by governments of the contribution the international education sector makes to economies and societies, both in Australia and globally. In the Strategic Actions we endorse the progress that is being made on a whole of government effort, including current reviews and consultations into the student visa framework, ESOS Act and National Code, all of which are integral to an integrated regulatory and support framework for the sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Deciding to Implement the International Baccalaureate (Ib) Primary Years Programme: a Case Study
    DECIDING TO IMPLEMENT THE INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE (IB) PRIMARY YEARS PROGRAMME: A CASE STUDY Sanjay Lalwani Bachelor of Education (Primary) (Queensland University of Technology) Master of Educational Leadership (Leading Learning) (Australian Catholic University) A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Philosophy School of Education Faculty of Education & Arts Australian Catholic University 11 November 2019 Deciding to implement the International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme: A case study. i STATEMENT OF ORIGINAL AUTHORSHIP This thesis contains no material that has been extracted in whole or in part from a thesis that I have submitted towards the award of any other degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. No other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgment in the main text of the thesis. All research procedures reported in the thesis received the approval of the relevant Ethics/Safety Committees (where required). Signed: Sanjay Lalwani Date: 11 November 2019 Deciding to implement the International Baccalaureate (IB) Primary Years Programme: A case study. ii STATEMENT OF APPRECIATION The completion of this thesis has taken a few years. As I near the end, I have the opportunity to acknowledge the generosity of a number of people who have helped, supported and encouraged me. First, my appreciation goes to my supervisory team – Professor Brendan Bartlett and Associate Professor Lauren Stephenson (both formerly of the Australian Catholic University). The enriching conversations, valuable insights, effective critiques and guidance you have offered me have been invaluable. My particular thanks go to Associate Professor Janeen Lamb for assisting me in conceptualising the findings of the study and for assisting me to get this thesis ready for submission.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Change and Teachers' Responses: a NSW Case Study
    Curriculum change and teachers’ responses: a NSW case study Linda Merewyn Lorenza A thesis submitted for fulfillment requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The Sydney School of Education and Social Work Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University of Sydney 2018 i Statement of originality This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. Linda Merewyn Lorenza ii Abstract This thesis reports on the findings of a study into NSW Arts teachers’ perceptions of curriculum change in the Arts in the Australian context. From 2015 Australian schools began to engage with a national curriculum in the Arts. There are considerable implications for both practice and policy. Teachers’ willingness to adopt a new curriculum and adapt to change is a mitigating factor. This research focussed on NSW drama, music and visual arts teachers’ perceptions of curriculum change from the state curriculum they currently teach, to the incoming Australian arts curriculum. Research was qualitative and employed a case study approach (G. Thomas, 2010) including the use of in-depth interview and document analysis. The opinions of the case study participants in this particular study reflect some and oppose other views expressed in consultation reports, which reflect the wide consultation conducted by the Australian Curriculum Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA) during the development of the Australian arts curriculum.
    [Show full text]
  • P O Stgradu Ate Gu Id E 20 20
    Contact us Postgraduate guide 2020 1800 SYD UNI (1800 793 864) Teaching and Professional Education +61 2 8627 1444 (outside Australia) sydney.edu.au/ask We acknowledge the tradition of custodianship and law of the Country on which the University of Sydney campuses stand. We pay our respects to those who have cared and continue to care for Country. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC®) is a globally recognised certification overseeing all fibre sourcing standards. This provides guarantees for the consumer that products are made of woodchips from well-managed forests and other controlled sources with strict environmental, economical and social standards. Join us Where will postgraduate study lead you? ....... 2 Teaching Master of Teaching ..............................................4 Master of Teaching (Early Childhood) ............. 5 Master of Teaching (Primary) ............................6 Master of Teaching (Health and Physical Education) ....................... 7 Master of Teaching (Secondary) ....................... 8 Postgraduate guide 2020 and Education Professional Teaching Professional education Master of Education .......................................... 10 Master of Education (Digital Technologies) ...12 Master of Education (Educational Management and Leadership) .........................13 Master of Education (Educational Psychology) ................................. 14 Master of Education (International Education) ..................................15 Master of Education (Leadership in Aboriginal Education)..............16
    [Show full text]
  • Navitas Limited Full Year 2018 Financial Results
    Navitas Limited Full Year 2018 Financial Results Incorporating the requirements of Appendix 4E Navitas Limited Annual Report 2018 0 ASX APPENDIX 4E Results for announcement to the market Report for the full year ended 30 June 2018 $m Revenues from ordinary activities 931.0 down 2.5% Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT*) 1.1 down 99% Loss after tax from ordinary activities attributable to members (55.8) down n/a Dividend Information Amount Franked amount per share per share (cents) (cents) Interim 2018 dividend (paid 15 March 2018) 9.4 9.4 Final 2018 dividend (to be paid 17 September 2018) 8.0 5.6 Important dates for shareholders Ex-dividend date 31 August 2018 Record date 3 September 2018 Payment date 17 September 2018 The Company’s dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) will apply for the final dividend. The DRP will be offered at no discount to market. The last date for receipt of an election notice to participate in the DRP is by 5.00pm (AEST) on 4 September 2018. 30 June 2018 30 June 2017 Net tangible asset backing per ordinary security (103.8 cents) (70.6 cents) Additional Appendix 4E disclosure requirements can be found in the directors’ report and the 30 June 2018 financial statements and accompanying notes. This report is based on the consolidated financial statements which have been audited. This document comprises the information required by ASX Listing Rule 4.3A and is Navitas Limited’s preliminary final report including its 2018 Full Year Financial Results. All comparisons are with the reported results for the full year ended 30 June 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration DECEMBER 2019 Mparntwe (Pronounced M-Ban Tua) Is the Arrernte Name for Alice Springs
    Alice Springs (Mparntwe) Education Declaration DECEMBER 2019 Mparntwe (pronounced M-ban tua) is the Arrernte name for Alice Springs. The Aboriginal Arrernte (pronounced arrunda) peoples are the traditional custodians of Alice Springs and the surrounding region. This Declaration is made by all Australian Education Ministers: Ms Yvette Berry MLA Minister for Education and Early Childhood Development (Australian Capital Territory) The Hon Dan Tehan MP Minister for Education (Australian Government) Chair, Ministerial Council on Education The Hon Sarah Mitchell MLC Minister for Education and Early Childhood Learning (New South Wales) The Hon Selena Uibo MLA Minister for Education (Northern Territory) The Hon Grace Grace MP Minister for Education (Queensland) The Hon John Gardner MP Minister for Education (South Australia) The Hon Jeremy Rockliff MP Minister for Education and Training (Tasmania) The Hon James Merlino MP Minister for Education (Victoria) The Hon Suzanne Ellery MLC Minister for Education and Training (Western Australia) Contents Story Preamble 2 Ceremony, Karrinyarra by Nerine Tilmouth represents Water Dreaming (also called Kapi, The Education Goals for Young Australians 4 or Ngapa Tjukurrpa), from Karrinyarra and Central Mt Wedge, north of Goal 1: The Australian education system promotes Papunya in Central Australia. The circles excellence and equity 5 represent water holes, and this site is Goal 2: All young Australians become confident and strongly associated with rain making creative individuals, successful lifelong learners, ceremonies. Karrinyarra represents an and active and informed members of the community 6 important cultural point of intersection, where people come together to share in access to the resources, and to take A Commitment to Action 9 responsibility for the Country and its Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Printmgr File
    NOTICE THIS OFFERING MEMORANDUM IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO INVESTORS WHO ARE EITHER (1) QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 144A UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “U.S. SECURITIES ACT”) OR (2) NON-U.S. PERSONS WHO ARE OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATION S UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT (AND, IF INVESTORS ARE RESIDENT IN A MEMBER STATE OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA, A QUALIFIED INVESTOR). IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the Offering Memorandum following this notice, whether received by email or otherwise received as a result of electronic communication. You are advised to read this disclaimer carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the Offering Memorandum. In accessing the Offering Memorandum, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them, each time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. THE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN, AND WILL NOT BE, REGISTERED UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OR OTHER JURISDICTION AND THE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD WITHIN THE UNITED STATES EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE OR LOCAL SECURITIES LAWS. THE FOLLOWING OFFERING MEMORANDUM WILL BE ACCESSIBLE IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT AND YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU RECEIVED THIS OFFERING MEMORANDUM IN A FORM THAT MAY NOT BE FORWARDED OR DISTRIBUTED TO ANY OTHER PERSON AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER.
    [Show full text]