DOCSLIB.ORG

A Wheelchair Rider's Guide: San Francisco Bay and the Nearby Coast

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Wheelchair Rider's Guide: San Francisco Bay and the Nearby Coast Wheelchair FM pp i-xiv, 1 5/9/06 4:51 PM Page CVR-1 AWheelchairAWheelchair Rider’sGuideRider’sGuide San Francisco Bay and the Nearby Coast BONNIE LEWKOWICZ AA COASTALCOASTAL CONSERVANCY CONSERVANCY BOOKBOOK Wheelchair FM pp i-xiv, 1 5/9/06 4:52 PM Page i AWheelchairAWheelchair Rider’sGuideRider’sGuide San Francisco Bay and the Nearby Coast BONNIE LEWKOWICZ AA COASTALCOASTAL CONSERVANCY CONSERVANCY BOOKBOOK Wheelchair FM pp i-xiv, 1 5/9/06 4:52 PM Page ii THIS GUIDE IS AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE by calling 510/286-1015 and also on the Coastal Conservancy website: www.scc.ca.gov THE COASTAL CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION published this book with a grant from the Coastal Conservancy, a state agency that works with others to protect and restore coastal resources and improve public access along the California coast and on San Francisco Bay. Since 1976, the Conservancy has helped to open hundreds of miles of shoreline to the public and to preserve more than 185,000 acres of wetlands, dunes, wildlife habitat, parks, and farmland. Many trail improvements resulted from block grants from the Conservancy to the Bay Trail Project. The Coastal Conservancy Association is a nonprofit organization which assists the Conservancy with projects undertaken in keeping with the mandate of the California Coastal Act. Coastal Conservancy © 2006 Coastal Conservancy A much smaller book with the same title, by Erick Mikiten, was published by the Coastal Conservancy in 1990. Coastal Conservancy Publications 1330 Broadway, 11th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612 510/286-1015 ALSO AVAILABLE: A Wheelchair Rider’s Guide: Los Angeles and Orange County Coast, by Erick and Elisa Mikiten, published by Coast- walk with the Coastal Conservancy in 2001: www.coastwalk.org or www.scc.ca.gov ALTHOUGH WE HAVE DONE OUR BEST TO BE CLEAR and accurate in this guide, we cannot guarantee that we have always achieved our goal. Also keep in mind that trail conditions change. You are responsible for your own safety. Please exercise due caution. Neither the Coastal Conservancy, the Coastal Conservancy Association, nor the producers of this book assume any liability for any injury or damage arising out of, or in connection with, any use of this book or the sites described in it. Wheelchair FM pp i-xiv, 1 5/9/06 4:52 PM Page iii Table of Contents INTRODUCTION vii HOW TO USE THIS BOOK xi Marin Coast 2 POINT REYES NATIONAL SEASHORE 4 Bear Valley 5 Point Reyes Hostel 7 Abbotts Lagoon 7 Drakes Beach 8 Lighthouse Visitor Center 9 GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA (GGNRA): FORT BAKER AND MARIN HEADLANDS 10 Fort Baker 10 H. Dana Bowers Vista Point 12 Bay Trail and Battery Spencer 12 Point Bonita Lighthouse and Bird Island Overlook 13 Fort Barry, Fort Cronkhite, and Rodeo Beach 14 GGNRA: MUIR WOODS TO STINSON BEACH 16 Muir Woods and Muir Beach 16 Steep Ravine Environmental Cabins and Campground 18 Stinson Beach 19 San Mateo and Santa Cruz Coast 20 PACIFICA AND HALF MOON BAY 22 Pacifica Municipal Pier and Sharp Park Beach 22 Headlands Trail and Rockaway Beach 23 Point Montara Lighthouse Hostel 24 Pillar Point Harbor 26 Half Moon Bay State Beach—Francis Beach 28 Miramontes Point Trail 29 COWELL RANCH STATE BEACH TO AÑO NUEVO 30 Cowell Ranch State Beach 30 San Gregorio, Pomponio, and Pescadero State Beaches 31 Bean Hollow State Beach 32 iii Wheelchair FM pp i-xiv, 1 5/9/06 4:52 PM Page iv iv A WHEELCHAIR RIDER’ S GUIDE Pigeon Point State Historic Park and Lighthouse Hostel 32 Año Nuevo State Reserve 33 NORTHERN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 35 Natural Bridges State Beach and West Cliff Drive 35 Santa Cruz Wharf and Boardwalk 39 San Francisco and Northern Peninsula 42 SAN FRANCISCO COAST 44 Baker Beach 44 China Beach 45 Eagles Point 46 Fort Miley and Point Lobos Overlook 46 Sutro Heights Park 47 Cliff House 48 Ocean Beach 50 Fort Funston 51 BAYSIDE SAN FRANCISCO: NORTHERN WATERFRONT AND ALCATRAZ 53 China Basin to Pier 39 53 Alcatraz 56 Fisherman’s Wharf 58 Aquatic Park 59 Fort Mason 61 Fisherman’s Wharf Hostel 63 Marina Green and the Wave Organ 63 Crissy Field 64 Fort Point 67 SAN FRANCISCO SOUTHERN BAY WATERFRONT 69 Islais Creek 69 Heron’s Head Park 70 India Basin Shoreline Park 71 Candlestick Point State Recreation Area 71 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND NORTHERN SAN MATEO COUNTY 73 Brisbane Marina 74 Oyster Point Marina and Park 74 San Bruno Point Park 75 Bayfront Park 76 Bayside Park and Burlingame Lagoon 77 Anza Lagoon and Robert E. Wooley Peninsula Park 79 Coyote Point Recreation Area 80 Coyote Point to the San Mateo Bridge 82 Wheelchair FM pp i-xiv, 1 5/9/06 4:52 PM Page v TABLE OF CONTENTS v South Bay Shore 84 SAN MATEO BRIDGE TO SOUTHERN BAYLANDS 86 Foster City 86 Redwood Shores 89 Bayfront Park 92 Palo Alto Baylands Nature Preserve 94 Byxbee Park and Adobe Creek Trail 97 Shoreline at Mountain View 97 Sunnyvale Baylands Park 101 DON EDWARDS SAN FRANCISCO BAY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 102 Environmental Education Center and Mallard Slough Loop Trail 103 Visitor Center, Tidelands Loop Trail, and Newark Slough Trail 104 COYOTE HILLS REGIONAL PARK AND ALAMEDA CREEK TRAIL 106 Coyote Hills Regional Park 106 Alameda Creek Trail 110 East Bay Shore 112 HAYWARD AND SAN LEANDRO 114 Hayward Regional Shoreline Interpretive Center to West Winton Avenue 114 West Winton Avenue to Grant Avenue 115 Grant Avenue to the San Leandro Marina 116 San Leandro Marina and Park 117 Oyster Bay Regional Shoreline 119 ALAMEDA AND OAKLAND 120 Bay Farm Island to Crown Beach 121 Robert W. Crown Memorial State Beach 122 Martin Luther King, Jr. Regional Shoreline 124 Union Point Park to Jack London Square 127 Jack London Square 129 Lake Merritt 131 Middle Harbor Shoreline Park 134 Port View Park 136 EMERYVILLE AND BERKELEY 137 Emeryville Marina Park and Bay Trail Loop 138 César Chávez Park 139 Berkeley Marina, Pier, Shorebird Park, and Nature Center 140 ALBANY AND RICHMOND 142 Albany Waterfront Trail 143 Point Isabel Regional Shoreline to Shimada Friendship Park 144 Wheelchair FM pp i-xiv, 1 5/9/06 4:52 PM Page vi vi A WHEELCHAIR RIDER’ S GUIDE Vincent Park, Marina Bay Park, and Lucretia Edwards Park 146 Miller/Knox Regional Shoreline 148 Ferry Point Pier 149 Carquinez Strait and North Bay Shore 150 PINOLE 152 Point Pinole Regional Shoreline 152 Pinole Shores Regional Park 154 Pinole Bayfront Park 155 MARTINEZ AND ANTIOCH 156 Martinez Regional Shoreline 156 Antioch/Oakley Regional Shoreline 158 BENICIA 159 Benicia Marina and Pier 160 West Ninth Street Park 161 Benicia State Recreation Area 161 VALLEJO 163 Vallejo Marina 163 River Park 165 NAPA AND PETALUMA RIVERS 166 John F. Kennedy Memorial Park 166 Shollenberger Park 168 Marin Bay Shore 170 SAN RAFAEL TO CORTE MADERA 172 Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District 172 John F. McInnis County Park 173 McNears Beach 174 Pickleweed Park 175 Jean and John Starkweather Shoreline Park 177 Corte Madera Ecological Reserve 178 TIBURON PENINSULA AND ANGEL ISLAND 178 Paradise Beach County Park 179 Tiburon Peninsula Historic Trail 180 Angel Island State Park 182 SAUSALITO AND MILL VALLEY 185 Sausalito Waterfront 186 Bothin Marsh and Bayfront Park 188 RESOURCES 19 0 Wheelchair FM pp i-xiv, 1 5/9/06 4:52 PM Page vii A Wheelchair Rider’s Guide OST BAY AREA RESIDENTS consider themselves lucky to be Msurrounded by so much natural beauty, yet too few find the time to explore more than a few of the numerous parks, trails, and open spaces within easy reach of their homes. Those in need of a fairly level and firm traveling surface—be they wheelchair riders, parents wheeling strollers, or people with canes or walkers—tend to frequent places they already know. They remain unaware of the many delights they could enjoy elsewhere along the bay and ocean, from the Point Reyes National Seashore to the Santa Cruz Boardwalk, from San Francisco’s lively waterfront to the wide open marshes of the Don Edwards National Wildlife Refuge, to his- toric Benicia and Antioch on the Carquinez Strait, to the protected wet- lands on the Petaluma River. These and many other places are public, and you can visit many free of charge. This guide, produced as part of the Coastal Conservancy’s San Fran- cisco Bay Area Conservancy and access programs, is a greatly expanded sec- ond edition of the 1990 book by Erick Mikiten. A great many more areas have been made wheelchair-accessible in the past 15 years. We hope this book will encourage you and many others to venture to some of the places here described—more than 100 sites—and to discover others that we could not fit in, or that had yet to be built when we went to press. You may be amazed that so much public access to the shore exists in such a densely populated metropolitan region, despite the fact that real estate values are among the highest in the country. This is no accident. San Francisco Bay was saved from destruction by local citizens. Until the 1960s, its nearshore waters were widely considered to be prospective real estate. Some areas were subdivided already, though the lots were under water. Throughout the region, cities were filling the bay with garbage and rubble vii Wheelchair FM pp i-xiv, 1 5/9/06 4:52 PM Page viii viii A WHEELCHAIR RIDER’ S GUIDE to make more land for building. But then three women in Berkeley stopped all that by launching the Save the Bay movement in 1961, which led to leg- islation that established the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Develop- ment Commission (BCDC) in 1965 to prevent unnecessary filling of the bay and ensure public access.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Creeks of UC Berkeley
    University of California, Berkeley 2 A TOUR OF THIS WALKING TOUR is a guide to Strawberry STRAWBERRY Creek on the campus of the University of California, Berkeley. Strawberry Creek is a CREEK ON major landscape feature of the campus, with THE UC its headwaters above the UC Botanical Garden BERKELEY in Strawberry Canyon. This tour covers only the central campus and should last about an CAMPUS hour. It begins at Faculty Glade, follows the South Fork downstream, and ends at Giannini Hall along the North Fork. A map with indicated stops is located at the end of this booklet. A BRIEF HISTORY In 1860, the College of California moved from Oakland to the present campus site, pur- chasing the land from Orrin Simmons, a sea captain turned farmer. Strawberry Creek was one of the main reasons the founders chose Simmons’ tract. “All the other striking advan- tages of this location could not make it a place fit to be chosen as the College Home without this water. With it every excellence is of double value.” The creek was named for the wild strawberries that once lined its banks. The central campus at that time was pastureland and grain fields. Coast live oaks, sycamores, bay laurel trees, and native shrubs lined the banks of Strawberry Creek. Three forks of the creek meandered through the cam- pus. In 1882, the small middle fork draining the central glade was filled to build a cinder running track, now occupied by the Life Sci- ences Building Addition. By the turn of the century, urbanization had already begun to affect the creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda, a Geographical History, by Imelda Merlin
    Alameda A Geographical History by Imelda Merlin Friends of the Alameda Free Library Alameda Museum Alameda, California 1 Copyright, 1977 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 77-73071 Cover picture: Fernside Oaks, Cohen Estate, ca. 1900. 2 FOREWORD My initial purpose in writing this book was to satisfy a partial requirement for a Master’s Degree in Geography from the University of California in Berkeley. But, fortunate is the student who enjoys the subject of his research. This slim volume is essentially the original manuscript, except for minor changes in the interest of greater accuracy, which was approved in 1964 by Drs. James Parsons, Gunther Barth and the late Carl Sauer. That it is being published now, perhaps as a response to a new awareness of and interest in our past, is due to the efforts of the “Friends of the Alameda Free Library” who have made a project of getting my thesis into print. I wish to thank the members of this organization and all others, whose continued interest and perseverance have made this publication possible. Imelda Merlin April, 1977 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer wishes to acknowledge her indebtedness to the many individuals and institutions who gave substantial assistance in assembling much of the material treated in this thesis. Particular thanks are due to Dr. Clarence J. Glacken for suggesting the topic. The writer also greatly appreciates the interest and support rendered by the staff of the Alameda Free Library, especially Mrs. Hendrine Kleinjan, reference librarian, and Mrs. Myrtle Richards, curator of the Alameda Historical Society. The Engineers’ and other departments at the Alameda City Hall supplied valuable maps an information on the historical development of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • California Highways & Public Works, May-June 1962
    P ~Jmited States of America PgtOCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 07th CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 108 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, 1dIAY 21, 1962 1Vo, g0 A~~' en~Zx tragic to our economy and to our etFOrts to Fourth, ovr State highway commission is The California Highway Program remain apace with our population increases composed of dedicated and intelligent men if this. total highway construction program who are appointed for overlapping terms, in were seriouslq curtailed for any reason. order to provide continuity, and they are EXTENSION OF REMARKS Second. I want to say thaw I am convinced required by law to take a statewide and not os California's Department of Public Works and a sectional viewpoint. State law spells out Division of Highways cooperate fully, com- in detail the procedure to be fflllowed by HON. GEORGE P. MILLER pleCely, and in honesty with the T7.S. Bureau the State highway commission, including OF CALIf'ORNIA of Public Roads. The regional office of the the requirement that public hearings be held Bureau of Public Roads Yor certain Western IN THE HOIISE OF REPRESENTATIVES on a rather heavy schedule. I have insisted, States is In Ban FYancisco anfl the State office as Governor Snight and Governor Warren Tuesday, M¢y 8, 1962 of the Bureau o1 Public Roads is right here insisted, that members of the highway com- in Sacramento where there is daily contact Mr. GEORGE P. MILLER. Mr. mission be nonpartisan in their conduct o1 between the California highway people and highway policy matters. Our commission is Speaker,from time to time, from various the Federal highway people.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley Marina Area Berkeley Pier/Ferry Facility
    Berkeley Marina Area Specific Plan + Berkeley Pier/Ferry Facility Planning Study COUNCIL WORKSESSION February 16, 2021 Overview • Waterfront background and issues • Update on status of Pier/Ferry and BMASP projects • Discuss possible solutions and changes • Get City Council feedback History of Berkeley Marina COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 BERKELEY MARINA AREA specific plan 01/28/2021 page 3 Berkeley Marina History COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 BERKELEY MARINA AREA specific plan 01/28/2021 page 4 Existing Berkeley Marina COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 BERKELEY MARINA AREA specific plan 01/28/2021 page 5 Berkeley Waterfront Regulatory Agencies + Land Use Restrictions Land Use Restrictions • State Lands Commission – Tideland Grant Trust (1913) • BCDC - 100’ Shoreband Jurisdiction • BCDC – 199 Seawall Drive and Parking Lot – Fill Permit (1966) • City of Berkeley Measure L – Open Space Ordinance (1986) • Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) Grants – (early 1980) Regulatory Agencies • Army Corp of Engineers • BCDC • California Department of Fish and Wildlife • State Regional Water Quality Control Board • State Lands Commission COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 BERKELEY MARINA AREA specific plan 01/28/2021 page 6 Economics of Berkeley Marina Area Operating Revenues* Operating Expenses Berth Rental Fees (55%) Marina Operations Hotel Lease (21%) Waterfront Maintenance Other Leases (14%) Marina Capital Projects Other Boating Fees (5%) Fund Lease Management Youth Programming (2%) Recreation Programs Other (2%) Internal Service Charges Water-Based Recreation (1%) Debt Service Security Special Events *Based on FY19 revenue COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 BERKELEY MARINA AREA specific plan 01/29/2021 page 7 Marina Fund Challenges Reserves depleted in FY2022 Annual Change in Reserve Balance End of Year Reserve Balance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #1 BERKELEY MARINA AREA specific plan 01/29/2021 page 8 Marina Fund Challenges • Marina Fund was never set up to succeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.4 Biological Resources 3.4- Biological Resources
    SECTION 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4- BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section discusses the existing sensitive biological resources of the San Francisco Bay Estuary (the Estuary) that could be affected by project-related construction and locally increased levels of boating use, identifies potential impacts to those resources, and recommends mitigation strategies to reduce or eliminate those impacts. The Initial Study for this project identified potentially significant impacts on shorebirds and rafting waterbirds, marine mammals (harbor seals), and wetlands habitats and species. The potential for spread of invasive species also was identified as a possible impact. 3.4.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SETTING HABITATS WITHIN AND AROUND SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY The vegetation and wildlife of bayland environments varies among geographic subregions in the bay (Figure 3.4-1), and also with the predominant land uses: urban (commercial, residential, industrial/port), urban/wildland interface, rural, and agricultural. For the purposes of discussion of biological resources, the Estuary is divided into Suisun Bay, San Pablo Bay, Central San Francisco Bay, and South San Francisco Bay (See Figure 3.4-2). The general landscape structure of the Estuary’s vegetation and habitats within the geographic scope of the WT is described below. URBAN SHORELINES Urban shorelines in the San Francisco Estuary are generally formed by artificial fill and structures armored with revetments, seawalls, rip-rap, pilings, and other structures. Waterways and embayments adjacent to urban shores are often dredged. With some important exceptions, tidal wetland vegetation and habitats adjacent to urban shores are often formed on steep slopes, and are relatively recently formed (historic infilled sediment) in narrow strips.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Holocene Anthropogenic Depression of Sturgeon in San Francisco Bay, California
    Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology | Vol. 35, No. 1 (2015) | pp. 3–27 Late Holocene Anthropogenic Depression of Sturgeon in San Francisco Bay, California JACK M. BROUGHTON Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 ERIK P. MARTIN Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 BRIAN MCENEANEY McEaneaney Construction Inc, 10182 Worchester Cir., Truckee, CA 96161 THOMAS WAKE Zooarchaeology Laboratory, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles DWIGHT D. SIMONS Consulting Archaeologist, 2334 Tiffany Way, Chico, CA Prehistoric resource depression has been widely documented in many late Holocene contexts characterized by expanding human population densities, and has been causally linked to a wide range of other significant changes in human behavior and biology. Some of the more detailed records of this phenomenon have been derived from the San Francisco Bay area of California, including a possible case of anthropogenic sturgeon depression, but evidence for the latter was derived from limited fish-bone samples. We synthesize and analyze a massive ichthyoarchaeological data set here, including over 83,000 identified fish specimens from 30 site components in the central San Francisco Bay, to further test this hypothesis. Allometric live weight relationships from selected elements are established to reconstruct size change in white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) through time, and—collectively—the data show significant linear declines over the last 3,000 years in the relative abundance of sturgeon compared to all other identified fishes, as well as declines in the maximum and mean weights of the harvested fish. Both these patterns are consistent with resource depression and do not appear to be related to changes in the estuarine paleoenvironment.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Packet Is Available for Download at Weta.Sanfranciscobayferry.Com
    Members of the Board SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER EMERGENCY TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY James Wunderman, Chair BOARD OF DIRECTORS SPECIAL MEETING Jessica Alba Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. Jeffrey DelBono Anthony J. Intintoli, Jr. VIDEOCONFERENCE Monique Moyer Join WETA BOD Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89718217408 Meeting ID: 897 1821 7408 Password: 33779 Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) The full agenda packet is available for download at weta.sanfranciscobayferry.com AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVE FY 2022-2024 TITLE VI PROGRAM Action 4. PRELIMINARY FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 OPERATING AND CAPITAL Information BUDGETS 5. WETA BUSINESS PLAN CONCEPT AND ORGANIZATION Information ADJOURNMENT All items appearing on the agenda are subject to action by the Board of Directors. Staff recommendations are subject to action and change by the Board of Directors. CHANGES RELATED TO COVID-19 Consistent with Governor Gavin Newsom’s Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20, effective immediately and until further notice, meetings will be conducted through virtual participation to promote social distancing and reduce the chance of COVID-19 transmission. PUBLIC COMMENTS As this is a special meeting of the Board, public comments are limited to the listed agenda items. If you know in advance that you would like to make a public comment during the videoconference, please email [email protected] with your name and item number you would like to provide comment on no later than 15 Water Emergency Transportation Authority May 20, 2021 Meeting of the Board of Directors minutes after the start of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Northern California by Jean Richmond
    BIRDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Site Guides to 72 of the Best Birding Spots by Jean Richmond Written for Mt. Diablo Audubon Society 1985 Dedicated to my husband, Rich Cover drawing by Harry Adamson Sketches by Marv Reif Graphics by dk graphics © 1985, 2008 Mt. Diablo Audubon Society All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means without prior permission of MDAS. P.O. Box 53 Walnut Creek, California 94596 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . How To Use This Guide .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Birding Etiquette .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Terminology. Park Information .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 One Last Word. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 Map Symbols Used. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Map With Numerical Index To Guides .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 The Guides. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Where The Birds Are. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 158 Recommended References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 165 Index Of Birding Locations. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 166 5 6 Birding Northern California This book is a guide to many birding areas in northern California, primarily within 100 miles of the San Francisco Bay Area and easily birded on a one-day outing. Also included are several favorite spots which local birders
    [Show full text]
  • Farallon Islands and Noon Day Rock, Supports the Largest Seabird Nesting Colony South of Alaska
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Farallon National Wildlife Refuge Photo: ©PRBO Dense colonies of common murres and colorful puffins cloak cliff faces and crags, while two-ton elephant seals fight fierce battles for breeding sites on narrow wave-etched terraces below. Natural History Surrounded by cold water and plenty of food Pt. Reyes San Rafael G ulf o f Fa Golden ra ll Gate on s Bridge iles Oakland 28 M San Francisco C a li fo Fremont rn PACIFIC OCEAN ia San Jose Farallon National Wildlife Refuge, made up of all the Farallon Islands and Noon Day Rock, supports the largest seabird nesting colony south of Alaska. Thirteen seabird species numbering over 200,000 individuals Pigeon nest here each summer. Throughout the year, six species of marine mammals Guillemot breed or haul out on the islands. These islands are beside the cold California current which originates in Alaska and flows north to south, they are also surrounded Photo: © Brian O’Neil by waters of the Gulf of Farallons National Marine Sanctuary. Lying 28 miles west of San Francisco Bay the Refuge is on the western edge of the continental shelf. This area of Western gull the ocean plunges to 6,000 foot depths. Cold upwelling water brought from the depths as the wind blows surface water westward from the shoreline, and the California current flowing southward past the islands provides an ideal biological mixing zone along the continental shelf and around the San Francisco Bay area. Photos: © Brian O’Neil We stw ard Win ds Upwelling ent Mixing urr a C Deep rni lifo Ca Cold Water S N USGS Chart of seafloor Upwelling occurs notably in the spring depths around when these wind and water currents Farallon NWR work together and saturate ocean waters with nutrients brought up from Black the deep ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
    [Show full text]
  • Park Report Part 1
    Alcatraz Island Golden Gate National Recreation Area Physical History PRE-EUROPEAN (Pre-1776) Before Europeans settled in San Francisco, the area was inhabited by Native American groups including the Miwok, in the area north of San Francisco Bay (today’s Marin County), and the Ohlone, in the area south of San Francisco Bay (today’s San Francisco peninsula). Then, as today, Alcatraz had a harsh environment –strong winds, fog, a lack of a fresh water source (other than rain or fog), rocky terrain –and there was only sparse vegetation, mainly grasses. These conditions were not conducive to living on the island. These groups may have used the island for a fishing station or they may have visited it to gather seabird eggs since the island did provide a suitable habitat for colonies of seabirds. However, the Miwok and Ohlone do not appear to have lived on Alcatraz or to have visibly altered its landscape, and no prehistoric archeological sites have been identified on the island. (Thomson 1979: 2, Delgado et al. 1991: 8, and Hart 1996: 4). SPANISH AND MEXICAN PERIOD (1776-1846) Early Spanish explorers into Alta California encountered the San Francisco Bay and its islands. (Jose Francisco Ortega saw the bay during his scouting for Gaspar de Portola’s 1769 expedition, and Pedro Fages described the three major islands –Angel, Alcatraz, and Yerba Buena –in his journal from the subsequent 1772 expedition.) However, the first Europeans to record their visit to Alcatraz were aboard the Spanish ship San Carlos, commanded by Juan Manuel de Ayala that sailed through the Golden Gate and anchored off Angel Island in August 1775.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Plan
    San Francisco Bay Plan San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission In memory of Senator J. Eugene McAteer, a leader in efforts to plan for the conservation of San Francisco Bay and the development of its shoreline. Photo Credits: Michael Bry: Inside front cover, facing Part I, facing Part II Richard Persoff: Facing Part III Rondal Partridge: Facing Part V, Inside back cover Mike Schweizer: Page 34 Port of Oakland: Page 11 Port of San Francisco: Page 68 Commission Staff: Facing Part IV, Page 59 Map Source: Tidal features, salt ponds, and other diked areas, derived from the EcoAtlas Version 1.0bc, 1996, San Francisco Estuary Institute. STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2600 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 PHONE: (415) 352-3600 January 2008 To the Citizens of the San Francisco Bay Region and Friends of San Francisco Bay Everywhere: The San Francisco Bay Plan was completed and adopted by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission in 1968 and submitted to the California Legislature and Governor in January 1969. The Bay Plan was prepared by the Commission over a three-year period pursuant to the McAteer-Petris Act of 1965 which established the Commission as a temporary agency to prepare an enforceable plan to guide the future protection and use of San Francisco Bay and its shoreline. In 1969, the Legislature acted upon the Commission’s recommendations in the Bay Plan and revised the McAteer-Petris Act by designating the Commission as the agency responsible for maintaining and carrying out the provisions of the Act and the Bay Plan for the protection of the Bay and its great natural resources and the development of the Bay and shore- line to their highest potential with a minimum of Bay fill.
    [Show full text]