The American Physical Society Celebrates Its 100Th

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The American Physical Society Celebrates Its 100Th he American Physical Society celebrates its 100th birthday in 1999. As part of this celebration the APS Centennial Committee recommended several Tprojects to inform the physics community, students, and the public about the achievements of physicists in the 20th century, including a Speakers Bureau to send hundreds of physicists and historians of phys- ics to lecture at universities and laboratories. 1998 APS President Andrew Sessler suggested that lec- tures on 20th century physics would be greatly en- hanced by pictures of the physicists whose theories and discoveries were being reviewed. This CD-ROM, welcome containing images of about 200 outstanding 20th century physicists with brief descriptions of their achievements, is the result. We hope it will be use- ful to anyone giving a survey talk on any aspect of modern physics, and that it will also be interesting to other physicists who want to see the faces that go with familiar names. How were the names chosen? The selection was done by a committee chaired by past President Sessler, consisting also of physicist-historians Stephen Brush, Gerald Holton, and Spencer Weart. Their pri- mary goal was to choose names likely to be men- tioned in lectures on 20th century physics. But there were two important limitations. First, the committee did not include anyone who died before 1900, although it included a few physicists (such as Boltzmann and Roentgen) whose most important contributions, while made before 1900, had a major impact on 20th century physics. Second, it excluded persons still alive at the end of 1997. Thus you will not find here pictures of Galileo, Newton, or Maxwell; nor, unfortunately, will you find women and minori- ties represented in the same proportion as in the current generation of active outstanding physicists. On the other hand, it interpreted the term “physicist” broadly, including several mathematicians, astronomers, chemists and earth scientists whose work is widely known and highly valued in the physics community. A third constraint was that the photos had to fit on a single CD-ROM. Thus it could not include every physicist recom- mended by one of the several groups consulted for suggestions. The committee used its own judgment to eliminate many names. While we are confident that all the persons included do in fact belong in this collection, it would be surprising if we did not receive complaints about some of the many omissions. We urge you to provide your reactions and suggestions concerning this project to the APS. We are especially in interested in learning how you found the CD-ROM useful and what changes would make it more so. The production of this CD-ROM was made possible by the resources and cooperation of the staff of the Center for History welcome of Physics at the American Center for Physics in College Park, Maryland, including the Emilio Segrè photograph collec- tion. Please note that you may use the images only for projection at lectures; permission to reproduce them in publications or in any other form must be requested from the copyright owner, indicated in the credit line for each photo. The Center for History of Physics, owns the world rights to many of these photos. To obtain permission for the remainder please contact the APS. We acknowledge also the invaluable assistance of Erika Ridgway and Elizabeth Buchan-Higgins, APS staff members, and Stephen Norton, a graduate student in the History and Philosophy of Science Program at the University of Maryland- College Park, for collecting information for the captions. Selection Committee: Andrew Sessler (chair), Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Stephen Brush, University of Maryland Celebrate Gerald Holton, Harvard University a Spencer Weart, Center for History of Physics Century of Physics SEARCH BY NAME A-L Alfvén, Hannes Olaf Gösta Bragg, William Henry Ehrenfest-Afanassjeva, T.A. Hertz, Gustav Ludwig Alvarez, Luis Walter Bragg, William Lawrence Einstein, Albert Hess, Victor Franz Anderson, Carl David Brattain, Walter Houser Ellis, Robert A., Jr. de Hevesy, George Appleton, Edward Victor Breit, Gregory Fairbank, William Martin Hilbert, David Aston, Francis William Bridgman, Percy Williams Fermi, Enrico Hodgkin, Dorothy Crowfoot Ayrton, Hertha Brillouin, Léon Nicolas Feynman, Richard Phillips Hofstadter, Robert L. Bainbridge, Kenneth T. Chadwick, James Fowler, William Alfred Houtermans, Fritz Georg Bardeen, John Chandrasekhar, Subrahmanyan Franck, James Hubble, Edwin Powell Barkla, Charles Glover Chapman, Sydney Frank, Ilya Mikhailovich Imes, Elmer Samuel Becquerel, Antoine-Henri Cherenkov, Pavel Alekseyevich Frank, Philipp Ioffe, Abram F. Bell, John Stewart Cockcroft, John Douglas Franklin, Rosalind Elsie Jensen, Johannes Hans Daniel Bhabha, Homi Jehangir Compton, Arthur Holly Frenkel Yakov Ilyich Joliot, Frédéric Bitter, Francis Condon, Edward Uhler Frisch, Otto Robert Joliot-Curie, Irène Blackett, Patrick Maynard Stuart Crookes, William Fukui, Kenichi Kamerlingh-Onnes, Heike Blau, Marietta Curie, Pierre Gabor, Dennis Kapitza, Pyotr Bloch, Felix Curie, Marie Sklodowska Gamow, George von Kármán, Théodore Blodgett, Katharine Burr Davisson, Clinton Joseph Geiger, Hans Wilhelm Kastler, Alfred Bogolyubov, Nikolai Nikolaevich DeBroglie, Louis Victor Gibbs, Josiah Willard Kemble, Edward Crawford Bohm, David Debye, Petrus Göppert-Mayer, Maria Kerst, Donald William Bohr, Niels Henrik David Dicke, Robert Henry Goudsmit, Samuel Abraham Klein, Oskar Benjamin Boltzman, Ludwig E. Dirac, Paul Adrien Maurice Grad, Harold Kramers, Hendrik A. Born, Max Du Mond, Jesse William Monroe Hahn, Otto Kurchatov, Igor Bose, Satyendra Nath Eddington, Arthur Stanley Hale, George Ellery Kusch, Polykarp Bouchet, Edward Alexander Ehrenfest, Paul Heisenberg, Werner Karl Land, Edwin Herbert SEARCH BY NAME L-Z Landau, Lev Davidovich Moseley, Henry Gwyn-Jeffreys Raman, Chandrasekhara Thomas, Llewellyn Landé, Alfred Mott, Nevill Francis Richardson, Owen Williams Thomson, George Paget Langevin, Paul Mulliken, Robert Sanderson Röntgen, Wilhelm Conrad Thomson, Joseph John Langmuir, Irving von Neumann, John Rossi, Bruno Tomonaga, Sin-itiro von Laue, Max Nier, Alfred Otto Carl Rutherford, Ernest Tuve, Merle Anthony Lawrence, Ernest Orlando Noether, Amalie Emmy Sabine, Wallace Clement Uhlenbeck, George Eugene Leavitt, Henrietta Swan Occhialini, Giuseppe Sakharov, Andrei Dmitrievich Urey, Harold Clayton Lehmann, Inge Onsager, Lars Salam, Abdus Van de Graaff, Robert J. Lemaître, Georges Oppenheimer, J. Robert Schiff, Leonard Issac Van Hove, Léon Libby, Willard Frank Patterson, Clair Cameron Schrödinger, Erwin Van Vleck, John H. Livingston, M. Stanley Paul, Wolfgang Schwarzschild, Martin Walton, Ernest Thomas Sinton London, Fritz Wolfgang Pauli, Wolfgang Schwinger, Julian Seymour Weyl, K.H. Herman Lonsdale, Kathleen Pauling, Linus Carl Segrè, Emilio Gino Wick, Gian-Carlo Lorentz, Hendrik Antoon Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia Serber, Robert Wideröe, Rolf Lyman, Theodore Peierls, Rudolf E. Shockley, William Wien, Wilhelm Mach, Ernst Perey, Marguerite Catherine Siegbahn, Karl Manne Georg Wiener, Norbert Marconi, Guglielmo Perrin, Jean Baptiste Slater, John Clarke Wigner, Eugene Paul Marshak, Robert Eugene Planck, Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Sommerfeld, Arnold Wood, Robert Williams Matthias, Bernd Teo Pockels, Agnes Spitzer, Lyman, Jr. Wu, Chien-Shiung McMillan, Edwin Mattison Poincaré, Jules Henri Stark, Johannes Yukawa, Hideki Meitner, Lise Powell, Cecil Frank Stern, Otto Zeeman, Pieter Michelson, Albert Abraham Prandtl, Ludwig Street, Jabez Curry Zel’dovich, Yakov B. Millikan, Robert Andrews Purcell, Edward Mills Strutt, John William Rayleigh Zernike, Fritz Minkowski, Hermann Rabi, Isidor Isaac Szilard, Leo Zwicky, Fritz von Mises, Richard Rainwater, Leo James Tamm, Igor Yevgenyevich HANNES OLAF GÖSTA Alfvén1908-1995 The Nobel Prize in Physics 1970 “for fundamental work and discoveries in magnetohydrody- namics with fruitful applications in different parts of plasma physics” Alfvén’s concepts such as magnetohydrodynamic waves and critical ionization velocity have also been useful in under- standing phenomena in the Earth’s ionosphere and else- where in the Solar System. AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives, Weber Collection LUIS WALTER Alvarez 1911-1988 The Nobel Prize in Physics 1968 “for his decisive contributions to elementary particle physics, in particular the discovery of a large number of resonance states, made possible through his devel- opment of the technique of using hydrogen bubble chamber and data analysis” Alvarez is well known to earth scientists as co-author of the theory that an asteroid struck the Earth about 65 million years ago, possibly resulting in the extinc- tion of dinosaurs and other species. AIP Meggers Gallery of Nobel Laureates CARL DAVID Anderson 1905-1991 The Nobel Prize in Physics 1936 “for his discovery of the positron” This confirmed Dirac’s prediction of the existence of an antiparticle for the electron. He also discovered, with S. H. Neddermeyer, the mu meson. AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives, W.F. Meggers Collection EDWARD VICTOR Appleton 1892-1965 The Nobel Prize in Physics 1947 “for his investigations of the physics of the upper at- mosphere, especially for the discovery of the so-called Appleton layer” AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives, E. Scott Barr Collection FRANCIS WILLIAM Aston1877-1945 The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1922 “for his discovery, by means of his mass spectrograph, of isotopes, in a large number of nonradioactive ele- ments, and for his enunciation of the whole-number rule” His determination of
Recommended publications
  • Igor Tamm 1895 - 1971 Awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1958
    Igor Tamm 1895 - 1971 Awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1958 The famous Russian physicist Igor Evgenievich Tamm is best known for his theoretical explanation of the origin of the Cherenkov radiation. But really his works covered various fields of physics: nuclear physics, elementary particles, solid-state physics and so on. In about 1935, he and his colleague, Ilya Frank, concluded that although objects can’t travel faster than light in a vacuum, they can do so in other media. Cherenkov radiation is emitted if charged particles pass the media faster than the speed of light ! For this research Tamm together with his Russian colleagues was awarded the 1958 Nobel Prize in Physics. Igor Tamm was born in 1895 in Vladivostok when Russia was still ruled by the Tsar. His father was a civil engineer who worked on the electricity and sewage systems. When Tamm was six years old his family moved to Elizavetgrad, in the Ukraine. Tamm led an expedition to He graduated from the local Gymnasium in 1913. Young Tamm dreamed of becoming a revolutionary, but his father disapproved . However only his mother was able to convince him to search for treasure in the Pamirs change his plans. She told him that his father’s weak heart could not take it if something happened to him. In 1923 Tamm was offered a teaching post at the Second Moscow University and later he was And so, in 1913, Tamm decided to leave Russia for a year and continue his studies in Edinburgh. awarded a professorship at Moscow State University.
    [Show full text]
  • James Chadwick: Ahead of His Time
    July 15, 2020 James Chadwick: ahead of his time Gerhard Ecker University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Wien, Austria Abstract James Chadwick is known for his discovery of the neutron. Many of his earlier findings and ideas in the context of weak and strong nuclear forces are much less known. This biographical sketch attempts to highlight the achievements of a scientist who paved the way for contemporary subatomic physics. arXiv:2007.06926v1 [physics.hist-ph] 14 Jul 2020 1 Early years James Chadwick was born on Oct. 20, 1891 in Bollington, Cheshire in the northwest of England, as the eldest son of John Joseph Chadwick and his wife Anne Mary. His father was a cotton spinner while his mother worked as a domestic servant. In 1895 the parents left Bollington to seek a better life in Manchester. James was left behind in the care of his grandparents, a parallel with his famous predecessor Isaac Newton who also grew up with his grandmother. It might be an interesting topic for sociologists of science to find out whether there is a correlation between children educated by their grandmothers and future scientific geniuses. James attended Bollington Cross School. He was very attached to his grandmother, much less to his parents. Nevertheless, he joined his parents in Manchester around 1902 but found it difficult to adjust to the new environment. The family felt they could not afford to send James to Manchester Grammar School although he had been offered a scholarship. Instead, he attended the less prestigious Central Grammar School where the teaching was actually very good, as Chadwick later emphasised.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project and Its Legacy
    Transforming the Relationship between Science and Society: The Manhattan Project and Its Legacy Report on the workshop funded by the National Science Foundation held on February 14 and 15, 2013 in Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Introduction 1 The Workshop 2 Two Motifs 4 Core Session Discussions 6 Scientific Responsibility 6 The Culture of Secrecy and the National Security State 9 The Decision to Drop the Bomb 13 Aftermath 15 Next Steps 18 Conclusion 21 Appendix: Participant List and Biographies 22 Copyright © 2013 by the Atomic Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this book, either text or illustration, may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, reporting, or by any information storage or retrieval system without written persmission from the publisher. Report prepared by Carla Borden. Design and layout by Alexandra Levy. Executive Summary The story of the Manhattan Project—the effort to develop and build the first atomic bomb—is epic, and it continues to unfold. The decision by the United States to use the bomb against Japan in August 1945 to end World War II is still being mythologized, argued, dissected, and researched. The moral responsibility of scientists, then and now, also has remained a live issue. Secrecy and security practices deemed necessary for the Manhattan Project have spread through the govern- ment, sometimes conflicting with notions of democracy. From the Manhattan Project, the scientific enterprise has grown enormously, to include research into the human genome, for example, and what became the Internet. Nuclear power plants provide needed electricity yet are controversial for many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Unerring in Her Scientific Enquiry and Not Afraid of Hard Work, Marie Curie Set a Shining Example for Generations of Scientists
    Historical profile Elements of inspiration Unerring in her scientific enquiry and not afraid of hard work, Marie Curie set a shining example for generations of scientists. Bill Griffiths explores the life of a chemical heroine SCIENCE SOURCE / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY LIBRARY PHOTO SCIENCE / SOURCE SCIENCE 42 | Chemistry World | January 2011 www.chemistryworld.org On 10 December 1911, Marie Curie only elements then known to or ammonia, having a water- In short was awarded the Nobel prize exhibit radioactivity. Her samples insoluble carbonate akin to BaCO3 in chemistry for ‘services to the were placed on a condenser plate It is 100 years since and a chloride slightly less soluble advancement of chemistry by the charged to 100 Volts and attached Marie Curie became the than BaCl2 which acted as a carrier discovery of the elements radium to one of Pierre’s electrometers, and first person ever to win for it. This they named radium, and polonium’. She was the first thereby she measured quantitatively two Nobel prizes publishing their results on Boxing female recipient of any Nobel prize their radioactivity. She found the Marie and her husband day 1898;2 French spectroscopist and the first person ever to be minerals pitchblende (UO2) and Pierre pioneered the Eugène-Anatole Demarçay found awarded two (she, Pierre Curie and chalcolite (Cu(UO2)2(PO4)2.12H2O) study of radiactivity a new atomic spectral line from Henri Becquerel had shared the to be more radioactive than pure and discovered two new the element, helping to confirm 1903 physics prize for their work on uranium, so reasoned that they must elements, radium and its status.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Nature of Matter: Made Easy (Lesson 3) Matter Behaving As a Wave? Ridiculous!
    Wave Nature of Matter: Made Easy (Lesson 3) Matter behaving as a wave? Ridiculous! Compiled by Dr. SuchandraChatterjee Associate Professor Department of Chemistry Surendranath College Remember? I showed you earlier how Einstein (in 1905) showed that the photoelectric effect could be understood if light were thought of as a stream of particles (photons) with energy equal to hν. I got my Nobel prize for that. Louis de Broglie (in 1923) If light can behave both as a wave and a particle, I wonder if a particle can also behave as a wave? Louis de Broglie I’ll try messing around with some of Einstein’s formulae and see what I can come up with. I can imagine a photon of light. If it had a “mass” of mp, then its momentum would be given by p = mpc where c is the speed of light. Now Einstein has a lovely formula that he discovered linking mass with energy (E = mc2) and he also used Planck’s formula E = hf. What if I put them equal to each other? mc2 = hf mc2 = hf So for my photon 2 mp = hfhf/c/c So if p = mpc = hfhf/c/c p = mpc = hf/chf/c Now using the wave equation, c = fλ (f = c/λ) So mpc = hc /λc /λc= h/λ λ = hp So you’re saying that a particle of momentum p has a wavelength equal to Planck’s constant divided by p?! Yes! λ = h/p It will be known as the de Broglie wavelength of the particle Confirmation of de Broglie’s ideas De Broglie didn’t have to wait long for his idea to be shown to be correct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Society Medals and Awards
    The Royal Society Medals and Awards Table of contents Overview and timeline – Page 1 Eligibility – Page 2 Medals open for nominations – Page 8 Nomination process – Page 9 Guidance notes for submitting nominations – Page 10 Enquiries – Page 20 Overview The Royal Society has a broad range of medals including the Premier Awards, subject specific awards and medals celebrating the communication and promotion of science. All of these are awarded to recognise and celebrate excellence in science. The following document provides guidance on the timeline and eligibility criteria for the awards, the nomination process and our online nomination system Flexi-Grant. Timeline • Call for nominations opens 30 November 2020 • Call for nominations closes on 15 February 2021 • Royal Society contacts suggested referees from February to March if required. • Premier Awards, Physical and Biological Committees shortlist and seek independent referees from March to May • All other Committees score and recommend winners to the Premier Awards Committee by April • Premier Awards, Physical and Biological Committees score shortlisted nominations, review recommended winners from other Committees and recommend final winners of all awards by June • Council reviews and approves winners from Committees in July • Winners announced by August Eligibility Full details of eligibility can be found in the table. Nominees cannot be members of the Royal Society Council, Premier Awards Committee, or selection Committees overseeing the medal in question. More information about the selection committees for individual medals can be found in the table below. If the award is externally funded, nominees cannot be employed by the organisation funding the medal. Self-nominations are not accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Famous Physicists Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh
    Fun Quiz FAMOUS PHYSICISTS HIMANSU SEKHAR FATESINGH 1. The first woman to 6. He first succeeded in receive the Nobel Prize in producing the nuclear physics was chain reaction. a. Maria G. Mayer a. Otto Hahn b. Irene Curie b. Fritz Strassmann c. Marie Curie c. Robert Oppenheimer d. Lise Meitner d. Enrico Fermi 2. Who first suggested electron 7. The credit for discovering shells around the nucleus? electron microscope is often a. Ernest Rutherford attributed to b. Neils Bohr a. H. Germer c. Erwin Schrödinger b. Ernst Ruska d. Wolfgang Pauli c. George P. Thomson d. Clinton J. Davisson 8. The wave theory of light was 3. He first measured negative first proposed by charge on an electron. a. Christiaan Huygens a. J. J. Thomson b. Isaac Newton b. Clinton Davisson c. Hermann Helmholtz c. Louis de Broglie d. Augustin Fresnel d. Robert A. Millikan 9. He was the first scientist 4. The existence of quarks was to find proof of Einstein’s first suggested by theory of relativity a. Max Planck a. Edwin Hubble b. Sheldon Glasgow b. George Gamow c. Murray Gell-Mann c. S. Chandrasekhar d. Albert Einstein d. Arthur Eddington 10. The credit for development of the cyclotron 5. The phenomenon of goes to: superconductivity was a. Carl Anderson b. Donald Glaser discovered by c. Ernest O. Lawrence d. Charles Wilson a. Heike Kamerlingh Onnes b. Alex Muller c. Brian D. Josephson 11. Who first proposed the use of absolute scale d. John Bardeen of Temperature? a. Anders Celsius b. Lord Kelvin c. Rudolf Clausius d.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Goudsmit
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SAMUEL ABRAHAM GOUDSMIT 1 9 0 2 — 1 9 7 8 A Biographical Memoir by BENJAMIN BEDERSON Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2008 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. Photograph courtesy Brookhaven National Laboratory. SAMUEL ABRAHAM GOUDSMIT July 11, 1902–December 4, 1978 BY BENJAMIN BEDERSON AM GOUDSMIT LED A CAREER that touched many aspects of S20th-century physics and its impact on society. He started his professional life in Holland during the earliest days of quantum mechanics as a student of Paul Ehrenfest. In 1925 together with his fellow graduate student George Uhlenbeck he postulated that in addition to mass and charge the electron possessed a further intrinsic property, internal angular mo- mentum, that is, spin. This inspiration furnished the missing link that explained the existence of multiple spectroscopic lines in atomic spectra, resulting in the final triumph of the then struggling birth of quantum mechanics. In 1927 he and Uhlenbeck together moved to the United States where they continued their physics careers until death. In a rough way Goudsmit’s career can be divided into several separate parts: first in Holland, strictly as a theorist, where he achieved very early success, and then at the University of Michigan, where he worked in the thriving field of preci- sion spectroscopy, concerning himself with the influence of nuclear magnetism on atomic spectra. In 1944 he became the scientific leader of the Alsos Mission, whose aim was to determine the progress Germans had made in the development of nuclear weapons during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physical Tourist Physics and New York City
    Phys. perspect. 5 (2003) 87–121 © Birkha¨user Verlag, Basel, 2003 1422–6944/05/010087–35 The Physical Tourist Physics and New York City Benjamin Bederson* I discuss the contributions of physicists who have lived and worked in New York City within the context of the high schools, colleges, universities, and other institutions with which they were and are associated. I close with a walking tour of major sites of interest in Manhattan. Key words: Thomas A. Edison; Nikola Tesla; Michael I. Pupin; Hall of Fame for GreatAmericans;AlbertEinstein;OttoStern;HenryGoldman;J.RobertOppenheimer; Richard P. Feynman; Julian Schwinger; Isidor I. Rabi; Bronx High School of Science; StuyvesantHighSchool;TownsendHarrisHighSchool;NewYorkAcademyofSciences; Andrei Sakharov; Fordham University; Victor F. Hess; Cooper Union; Peter Cooper; City University of New York; City College; Brooklyn College; Melba Phillips; Hunter College; Rosalyn Yalow; Queens College; Lehman College; New York University; Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences; Samuel F.B. Morse; John W. Draper; Columbia University; Polytechnic University; Manhattan Project; American Museum of Natural History; Rockefeller University; New York Public Library. Introduction When I was approached by the editors of Physics in Perspecti6e to prepare an article on New York City for The Physical Tourist section, I was happy to do so. I have been a New Yorker all my life, except for short-term stays elsewhere on sabbatical leaves and other visits. My professional life developed in New York, and I married and raised my family in New York and its environs. Accordingly, writing such an article seemed a natural thing to do. About halfway through its preparation, however, the attack on the World Trade Center took place.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riches of Uranium Uranium Is Best Known, and Feared, for Its Involvement in Nuclear Energy
    in your element The riches of uranium Uranium is best known, and feared, for its involvement in nuclear energy. Marisa J. Monreal and Paula L. Diaconescu take a look at how its unique combination of properties is now increasingly attracting the attention of chemists. t is nearly impossible to find an uplifting, and can be arrested by the skin, making found about uranium’s superior catalytic funny, or otherwise endearing quote on depleted uranium (composed mainly of 238U) activity may not be an isolated event. The Iuranium — the following dark wisecrack1 safe to work with as long as it is not inhaled organometallic chemistry of uranium was reflects people’s sinister feelings about this or ingested. born during the ‘Manhattan project’ — code element: “For years uranium cost only a few Studying the fundamental chemistry of name of the development of the first nuclear dollars a ton until scientists discovered you uranium is an exotic endeavour, but those who weapon during the Second World War. This could kill people with it”. But, in the spirit of embrace it will reap its benefits. Haber and field truly began to attract interest in 1956 rebranding, it is interesting to note that the Bosch found that uranium was a better catalyst when Reynolds and Wilkinson reported the main source of Earth’s internal heat comes than iron for making ammonia2. The preparation of the first cyclopentadienyl from the radioactive decay of uranium, isolation of an η1-OCO complex derivatives6. The discovery of thorium and potassium-40 that keeps the of uranium3 also showed uranocene electrified the field outer core liquid, induces mantle convection that, even though it is as much as that of ferrocene and, subsequently, drives plate tectonics.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 31-01-2018 Time: 60 Min
    8thAHMED BIN ABOOD MEMORIAL State Level Physics-Maths Knowledge Test-2018 Organized by Department of Physics Department of Mathematics Milliya Arts, Science and Management Science College, BEED Max. Marks: 50 31-01-2018 Time: 60 min Instructions:- All the questions carry equal marks. Mobile and Calculators are not allowed. Student must write his/her names, college name and allotted seat number on the response sheet provided. Student must stick the answer in the prescribed response sheet by completely blacken the oval with black/blue pen only. Incorrect Method Correct Method Section A 1) If the earth completely loses its gravity, then for any body……… (a) both mass and weight becomes zero (b) neither mass nor weight becomes zero (c) weight becomes zero but not the mass (d) mass becomes zero but not the weight 2) The angular speed of a flywheel is 3π rad/s. It is rotating at…….. (a) 3 rpm (b) 6 rpm (c) 90 rpm (d) 60 rpm 3) Resonance occurs when …. (a) a body vibrates at a frequency lower than its normal frequency. (b) a body vibrates at a frequency higher than its normal frequency. (c) a body is set into vibrations with its natural frequency of another body vibrating with the same frequency. (d) a body is made of the same material as the sound source. 4) The SI unit of magnetic flux density is…… (a) tesla (b) henry (c) volt (d) volt-second 5) Ampere’s circuital law is integral form of….. (a) Lenz’s law (b) Faraday’s law (c) Biot-Savart’s law (d) Coulomb’s law 1 6) The energy band gap is highest in the case of …….
    [Show full text]
  • Journal BAS ^ Association of Jewish Refugees the Rescue of Refugee Scholars
    VOLUME 9 NO.2 FEBRUARY 2009 journal BAS ^ Association of Jewish Refugees The rescue of refugee scholars eventy-five years ago, in 1933, Robbins on the spot. The AAC, which was the Academic Assistance Council, essentially mn from within the academic known from 1936 as the Society for community in Britain, then came into being the Protection of Science and very quickly. SLeaming, was founded. The AAC/SPSL was In May 1933, a letter signed by a list of a remarkable body that played a unique part leading figures in British university and in the rescue of scholars and scientists, intellectual life was published in The Times, mostly Jewish, who had been dismissed by proposing the establishment of an organi­ the Nazis from their posts at German and sation to rescue the careers and lives of Austrian universities and whose livelihoods, displaced academics. The Council's initial and lives, were endangered. declaration was signed by over 40 of Brit­ After the passing of the Gesetz zur ain's most eminent men of scholarship, Wiederherstellung des Bemfsbeamtentums including John Maynard Keynes, Gilbert of 7 April 1933, aimed at removing racially Murray, the Presidents of the Royal Society and politically undesirable persons from and the British Academy, and 9 Chancel­ the civil service, something like a quarter Esther Simpson OBE lors or Vice-Chancellors of universities and of the academic staff at German sciences), an extraordinary record of 7 Masters or Directors of colleges. The universities and research institutes were academic achievement. celebrated scientist Lord Rutherford became dismissed, of whom some 2,000, or about The two principal initiators of the AAC the AAC's first president.
    [Show full text]