Attention to Complaints and Enquiries by Investors 2018 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Attention to Complaints and Enquiries by Investors 2018 Annual Report Attention to Complaints and Enquiries by Investors 2018 Annual Report Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores Edison, 4 28006 Madrid Passeig de Gràcia, 19 08007 Barcelona © Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores Reproduction of the content of this report is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. All of the CNMV's regular reports and publications can be found on the Internet at www.cnmv.es Layout: Composiciones Rali, S.A. ISSN: 1989-2071 Table of contents Abbreviations 11 1 Introduction 17 2 Changes in the complaints handling procedure 23 2.1 Regulatory changes in 2017 23 2.2 Issues that need to be adapted 23 2.3 Reasons for non-admission 24 2.4 Duration of the procedures 25 2.5 Transitional adaptations to the procedure laid down in Order ECC/2502/2012 resulting from the obligation to adapt to Law 7/2017 25 3 Activity in 2018 29 3.1 Documents filed with the CNMV Complaints Service 29 3.2 Processing of the documents 33 3.2.1 Pre-processing stage 33 3.2.2 Processing and resolution stage 34 3.2.3 Follow-up stage 35 3.3 Complaints resolved in 2018 37 3.3.1 Pre-processing stage 37 3.3.2 Final stage 42 3.3.3 Follow-up stage 52 3.3.4 Entity rankings 54 3.4 Information provided by the entities 65 3.5 CNMV Complaints Service meetings with the heads of customer service departments 71 3.5.1 CSD location in the internal structure of the entities 71 3.5.2 Procedural Issues 71 3.5.3 Informative issues 72 3.6 International cooperation mechanisms 72 3.6.1 Financial Dispute Resolution Network (FIN-NET) 72 3.6.2 International Network of Financial Services Ombudsman Schemes (INFO Network) 74 3.6.3 Cross-border complaints 74 4 Criteria applied in the resolution of complaints 83 4.1 Marketing/simple execution 83 4.2 Investment advisory services and client portfolio management 115 4.3 Prior information 129 4.3.1 Securities 129 4.3.2 Collective investment schemes (CIS) 142 4.3.3 Discretionary portfolio management 149 4.4 Subsequent information 150 4.4.1 Securities 150 4.4.2 Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) 193 4.4.3 Discretionary portfolio management 201 4.5 Orders 202 4.5.1 Securities 203 4.5.2 Collective investment schemes (CIS) 217 4.6 Fees 223 4.6.1 Securities 223 4.6.2 Investment funds 236 5 4.6.3 Portfolio management 247 4.6.4 Advisory services 250 4.7 Wills 251 4.8 Ownership 281 4.9 Operation of the entities’ CSD 290 5 Enquiries area 297 5.1 Enquires 297 5.1.1 Enquiry volumes and channels 297 5.1.2 Subjects of enquiries 299 5.1.3 Key subjects of enquiries 300 5.1.3.1 Enquiries and complaints relating to the stock market performance of the shares of Distribuidora Internacional de Alimentación, S.A. (DIA) 300 5.1.3.2 Enquiries and queries relating to changes in the minimum trading price of certain securities in the electronic trading system (SIB), and queries relating to the implementation of minimum lot trading requirements 301 5.1.3.3 Enquiries relating to the status of shareholders of Abertis Infraestructuras, S.A. (Abertis) after the voluntary takeover bid carried out by Hochtief Aktiengesellschaft for 100% of the company’s share capital, expressing an intention to delist its shares, which were delisted on 6 August 2018 302 5.1.3.4 Enquiries relating to an heir’s wish to know where a deceased’s securities are deposited, in addition to information on acquisition dates and prices 302 5.1.3.5 Enquiries relating to the delay in the admission to listing of the capital increase carried out by Urbas Grupo Financiero, S.A. in 2015 302 6 List of figures Figure 1 Types of investors that apply to the Complaints Service 29 Figure 2 Origin of the investors that address the Complaints Service 30 Figure 3 Type of entities 30 Figure 4 Complaints against credit institutions 31 Figure 5 Complaints against investment firms and management firms 31 Figure 6 Complaints against investment firms and CIS management companies compared with credit institutions 32 Figure 7 Percentage distribution by presentation mode 32 Figure 8 Place of filing 33 Figure 9 Breakdown of PRP concluded in 2018 38 Figure 10 Reasons for requesting a petition for rectification 39 Figure 11 Response to petitions for rectification 40 Figure 12 Grounds for petitions for pleadings 41 Figure 13 Response to petitions for pleadings 42 Figure 14 Complaints concluded in 2018 42 Figure 15 Types of non-admissions 46 Figure 16 Grounds for non-admission after petition for pleadings 47 Figure 17 Reasons for non-admission not rectified after response 48 Figure 18 Time to completion by type of non-admission 48 Figure 19 Distribution of types of complaint resolution 50 Figure 20 Percentage of resolution type 50 Figure 21 Time to completion by complaint type 52 Figure 22 Follow-up actions 53 Figure 23 Replies from complainants 54 Figure 24 Percentage of decisions favourable to the complainant by entity 60 Figure 25 Percentage of acceptances/mutual agreements by entity 62 Figure 26 Subjects of enquiries 300 7 CNMV List of tables Attention to Complaints and Enquiries by Investors 2018 Annual Report Table 1 Presentation mode 32 Table 2 Complaints processed in full in 2018 37 Table 3 PRP concluded in 2018 38 Table 4 Non-admitted complaints concluded in 2018 43 Table 5 Types of non-admissions 43 Table 6 Complaints concluded in 2018 49 Table 7 Resolution of complaints concluded in 2018 49 Table 8 Reasons for complaints concluded in 2018 51 Table 9 Follow-up actions for reports favourable to the complainant 53 Table 10 Ranking of entities by number of complaints resolved 56 Table 11 Ranking of entities by timescale for reading the notification of opening complaint procedures 57 Table 12 Ranking of entities by timescale for responding to the initial petition for pleadings 58 Table 13 Ranking of entities by percentage of decisions favourable to the complainant 59 Table 14 Ranking of entities by number of acceptances and mutual agreements 61 Table 15 Ranking of entities by percentage of follow-up actions reported after a report favourable to the complainant 63 Table 16 Ranking of entities by percentage of acceptance of criteria or rectification after a report favourable to the complainant 64 Table 17 Complaints filed relating to the securities market 67 Table 18 Complaints related to the securities markets not admitted by entities in 2018 68 Table 19 Complaints relating to the securities market admitted and resolved by entities in 2018 70 Table 20 Number of enquiries by channel 298 8 List of exhibits Exhibit 1 Summary of complaints relating to simple execution/marketing 113 Exhibit 2 Summary of complaints relating to advisory services/portfolio management 127 Exhibit 3 Summary of complaints relating to information prior to the purchase of securities 141 Exhibit 4 Summary of complaints relating to information prior to the purchase of CIS 148 Exhibit 5 Summary of complaints relating to subsequent information on the securities 192 Exhibit 6 Summary of complaints relating to subsequent information on CIS 200 Exhibit 7 Summary of complaints relating to securities orders 216 Exhibit 8 Summary of complaints relating to CIS subscriptions and redemptions 222 Exhibit 9 Summary of complaints relating to securities fees 235 Exhibit 10 Summary of complaints relating to CIS fees 246 Exhibit 11 Summary of complaints on the execution of wills 279 Exhibit 12 Summary of complaints relating to ownership 289 Exhibit 13 Summary of complaints relating to the operation of the CSD or Customer Ombudsman 292 9 Abbreviations AA. PP. Public Administration Services ABS Asset-backed security ACGR Annual corporate governance report AIAF Asociación de Intermediarios de Activos Financieros (Spanish market in fixed-income securities) AIF Alternative Investment Funds ANCV Agencia Nacional de Codificación de Valores (Spain’s national numbering agency) ARDR Annual report on director remuneration ASCRI Asociación Española de Capital, Crecimiento e Inversión (Spanish association of capital, growth and investment entities) AV Agencia de valores (broker) BIS Bank for International Settlements BME Bolsas y Mercados Españoles BTA Bono de titulización de activos (asset-backed bond) BTH Bono de titulización hipotecaria (mortgage-backed bond) CADE Central de Anotaciones de Deuda del Estado (public debt book-entry trading system) CC. AA. Autonomous regions CCP Central counterparty CDS Credit default swap CDTI Centre for the Development of Industrial Technology CFD Contract for differences CNA Competent national authority CNMV Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (Spain’s National Securities Market Commission) CO Customer Ombudsman CP Crowdfunding platforms CSD Central securities depository CSDR Central Securities Depositories Regulation DGSFP Dirección General de Seguros y Fondos de Pensiones (Directorate-General for Insurance and Pension Funds) EAFI Empresa de asesoramiento financiero (financial advisory firm) EBA European Banking Authority EC European Commission ECA Credit and savings institutions ECB European Central Bank ECR Entidad de capital riesgo (venture capital firm) EFAMA European Fund and Asset Management Association EICC Entidad de inversión colectiva de tipo cerrado (closed-ended collective investment entity) EIOPA European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority EIP Public interest entity 11 EMIR European Market Infrastructure Regulation EMU Economic and Monetary Union (euro area) ESFS European System of Financial Supervisors ESI Investment firms ESM European Stability Mechanism ESMA European Securities and Markets Authority ESRB European Systemic
Recommended publications
  • The First Fintechs: How Early Online Brokers Pioneered Innovation Through Financial Technology

    The First Fintechs: How Early Online Brokers Pioneered Innovation Through Financial Technology

    The first fintechs: How early online brokers pioneered innovation through financial technology. PERSPECTIVE 1 @investSuite | [email protected] | www.investsuite.com CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. The importance of technology in the financial industry’s innovation dictionary 5 3. The do-it-yourself (DIY) investor 7 4. The very first FinTechs 8 5. A short history 10 May Day, 1975 – The ‘Big Bang’ of discount brokerage 10 The first online trade 11 The Europeans 13 Non-stop innovation and adaptation machines 16 6. Low prices and the internet behind the rise of the DIY investor 18 7. Embracing new technology – The internet further driving the rise of the DIY investor 21 8. Entrepreneurial inspiration and innovation lessons 22 An innovation-driven, entrepreneurial CEO 22 Culture 23 People 24 Seize opportunities 25 Dealing with ‘no’ 26 Adapt and reinvent 26 Small is beautiful 27 Takeaways 30 1. INTRODUCTION Bart Vanhaeren CEO & Co-founder InvestSuite Radical innovation is about realising an X-fold improvement in something beneficial to a client. That ‘something’ may be a major price reduction, a mind-blowing quality improvement, a much better service, a new business line or model, or any combination of these elements. Whether your definition of ‘X-fold’ is five, ten or a hundred times, this is clearly not about incremental improvements. Although those are also important, radical innovation is different. Acknowledging this difference is important, because a different approach is required. In this Perspective, I argue that some of first real ‘fintech disruptors’ – the (online) discount brokers – as ‘entrepreneur-innovators’, offer valuable lessons for small and large incumbents in the financial industry.
  • Securities Brokerage

    Securities Brokerage

    LoanRange BusinessName Address City State Zip NAICSCode BusinessType RaceEthnicity Gender Veteran NonProfit JobsRetained DateApproved Lender CD c $1-2 million NBC SECURITIES, INC. 1927 1ST AVE NORTHBIRMINGHAM AL 35203 523120 Corporation Unanswered Unanswered Unanswered 75 4/8/2020 South State Bank, National AssociationAL - 07 e $150,000-350,000MCDONALD FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC 350 LEAVELL CIR MONTGOMERY AL 36117 523120 Limited Liability Company(LLC)Unanswered Unanswered Unanswered 13 4/13/2020 ServisFirst Bank AL - 02 e $150,000-350,000ABLE FINANCIAL GROUP LLC 6991 E CAMELBACK RD STE D200SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251 523120 Limited Liability Company(LLC)Unanswered Unanswered Unanswered 6 4/28/2020 First-Citizens Bank & Trust CompanyAZ - 06 e $150,000-350,000BCJ CAPITAL MANAGEMENT 8355 East Hartford Drive Suite 105SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255 523120 Sole ProprietorshipUnanswered Male Owned Non-Veteran 16 4/14/2020 Readycap Lending, LLCAZ - 06 e $150,000-350,000CLICK IPO SECURITIES, LLC 8601 N SCOTTSDALE RDPARADISE VALLEY AZ 85253 523120 Limited Liability Company(LLC)Unanswered Unanswered Unanswered 7 4/9/2020 Sterling Bank AZ - 06 e $150,000-350,000ENVOY DEVELOPMENT, LLC 8036 S 38TH WAY PHOENIX AZ 85042 523120 Limited Liability Company(LLC)Unanswered Unanswered Unanswered 14 5/3/2020 Bank of America, National AssociationAZ - 07 e $150,000-350,000SCOTTSDALE CAPITAL ADVISORS CORP. 7170 E MCDONALD DR Suite 6PARADISE VALLEY AZ 85253 523120 Corporation White Male Owned Non-Veteran 10 5/8/2020 Carver State Bank AZ - 06 b $2-5 million LODESTONE PACIFIC HOLDING COMPANY,
  • Itc Conference Call Transcript

    Itc Conference Call Transcript

    Itc Conference Call Transcript Inside-out Burke fords his textualism jawbones scowlingly. Is Reggy perforative when Raymundo decarbonize fractionally? Cuspate and radiotoxic Claudius innervating her grinders hirsle sarcastically or tucker illatively, is Fred coercive? Do significantly lower short time to Gcla national bank information via email list of all, treasurer and facebook is bangladesh continues through the inuit to shut down, itc conference call transcript for any other. If the next question from ittai kidron with? Creative financing plans for our infrastructure, you may contain a title for. They will be a way back to itc already have agreed for itc conference call transcript of existing compiled css or is? Thank you enter the networking company and beneficial to add some may contain important for other than others? The course of the incident through a discount for clean energy advisors, whether express jumped into. This newly competitive landscape of channels, call transcript for investors are strong brand quickly, it comes from icici lombard general. Benefited from home, chief financial institutions providing all know. Eps decrease for it on how visitors. The calls for clinical negligence claims continued pressure on towards evidence around. Eps accretive or a transcript we hail from srinjoy, itc conference call transcript for itc in arista transcript. Waynesburg university of principal. Order in your customers to see it will be willing for wine glasses, which often generated by the extension of its yrc worldwide. Scan across all adds or rebuilding our outlook for us through yearend, those who have and our base. Score priority date made our next question on a run out their progress toward excellence in our periodic reports as an amazing upside surprises versus a major maritime shipping solutions.
  • SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report

    SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report

    SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report Just2Trade 1900 L Street NW Suite 301 Washington, DC 20036 SEC-Required Report on Routing of Customers Orders For Quarter Ending June 30, 2014 Just2Trade has prepared this report pursuant to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule requiring all brokerage firms to make publicly available quarterly reports on their order routing practices. The report provides information on routing of "non-directed orders" - any order that the customer has not specifically instructed to be routed to a particular venue on behalf of its customers. The report is divided into four sections: one for securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange and reported as a Network A eligible security; one for securities listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market; one for securities listed on the American Stock Exchange or regional exchanges and reported as a Network B eligible security; and one for exchange-listed options. For each section, this report identifies the venues most often selected by Just2Trade, sets forth the percentage of various types of orders routed to the venues, and discusses the material aspects of Just2Trade's relationship with the venues. Securities Listed on New York Stock Exchange: SEC Rule 606 Report Non-directed orders as percentage of total customer orders 84.51% Market orders as percentage of total non-directed orders 24.05% Limit orders as percentage of total non-directed orders 70.60% Other orders as percentage of total non-directed orders 5.35% Venues Receiving Significant Percentage of Total Non-Directed Orders: LAMP 45.17% MAXM 21.30% PDQ 33.53% Information Concerning Significant Venues: 1.
  • SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report

    SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report

    SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report Just2Trade 17 State Steet, 7th Floor New York, NY 10004 SEC-Required Report on Routing of Customers Orders For Quarter Ending June 30, 2015 Just2Trade has prepared this report pursuant to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule requiring all brokerage firms to make publicly available quarterly reports on their order routing practices. The report provides information on routing of "non-directed orders" - any order that the customer has not specifically instructed to be routed to a particular venue on behalf of its customers. The report is divided into four sections: one for securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange and reported as a Network A eligible security; one for securities listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market; one for securities listed on the American Stock Exchange or regional exchanges and reported as a Network B eligible security; and one for exchange-listed options. For each section, this report identifies the venues most often selected by Just2Trade, sets forth the percentage of various types of orders routed to the venues, and discusses the material aspects of Just2Trade's relationship with the venues. Securities Listed on New York Stock Exchange: SEC Rule 606 Report Non-directed orders as percentage of total customer orders 85.01% Market orders as percentage of total non -directed orders 25.81% Limit orders as percentage of total non-directed orders 69.33% Other orders as percentage of total non-directed orders 4.87% Venues Receiving Significant Percentage of Total Non-Directed Orders: LAMP 63.28% PDQ 36.72% Information Concerning Significant Venues: 1.
  • Information Memorandum

    Information Memorandum

    Sustainable Dividends Value Fund Information Memorandum Sustainable Dividends 020 244 36 54 [email protected] www.sustainabledividends.com Content CONTENT 1 1 IMPORTANT INFORMATION 4 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 2.1 The Fund, the Fund Manager and the Depositary 5 2.2 Investment Objective and Strategy 5 2.3 Legal, Tax and Regulatory Aspects 6 2.4 Dividend Distribution Policy 6 2.5 Minimum Investment, Subscriptions and Redemptions 6 2.6 Website 6 3 DEFINITIONS 7 4 THE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY 10 4.1 Introduction to the Sustainable Dividend Value Fund 10 4.2 Fund Objectives 10 4.3 Investment Style and Philosophy 11 4.4 Investment Strategy 11 4.4.1 Sustainable Business Model 12 4.4.2 Valuation 12 4.4.3 Financial Strength 12 4.4.4 Dividend 13 4.4.5 Shareholder Orientation 13 4.4.6 ESG Orientation 14 4.5 Portfolio Construction 14 4.6 Investment Restrictions 15 4.7 Voting Policy 15 5 FUND MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE 16 5.1 Manager 16 5.2 Depositary 17 SUSTAINABLE DIVIDENDS VALUE FUND 1 5.3 Custodian 17 5.4 Administrator 18 5.5 Advisory Board 18 5.6 Meetings of Investors 19 5.7 Conflicts of interest 19 5.8 Liquidity management 20 5.9 Complaints procedure 20 5.10 Equal treatment of Participants 20 6 TRANSFER, ISSUE AND REDEMPTION OF PARTICIPATIONS 21 6.1 Investor suitability 21 6.2 Transfers 21 6.3 Subscriptions and redemptions 21 6.3.1 Anti-dilution levy 22 6.3.2 Procedure 22 6.3.3 Subscriptions 23 6.3.4 Redemptions 23 6.4 Investor representation and warranty 24 7 COSTS AND EXPENSES 25 7.1 Management fee 25 7.2 Performance fee 25 7.3 Operational
  • List of Brokers and Dealers with No Outstanding Past-Due Share of the Broker-Dealer Accounting Support Fee

    1666 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Office: (202) 207-9100 www.pcaobus.org List of Brokers and Dealers with No Outstanding Past-Due Share of the Broker-Dealer Accounting Support Fee Determination of Payment under PCAOB Rule 7104(b) As of September 22, 2021 The following is a list of brokers and dealers that have been assessed and have no outstanding past-due share of the broker-dealer accounting support fee of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), as of September 22, 2021.1/ A registered public accounting firm may take the inclusion of a broker or dealer on this list as an indication that the broker or dealer has no outstanding past-due share of the broker-dealer accounting support fee for purposes of PCAOB Rule 7104(b). This list will be updated at least bi-weekly. If a registered public accounting firm cannot obtain a representation from the broker or dealer or cannot determine by reviewing the list below whether the broker or dealer has no past-due share of the accounting support fee outstanding, the registered public accounting firm may contact the staff by phone at 1-202-207-9294 (Business Days: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. ET) or by email at [email protected]. If you believe a broker or dealer has been excluded from this list in error, please contact the staff by phone at 1-202-207-9294 (Business Days: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. ET) or by email at [email protected]. Additional information about the broker-dealer accounting support fee and the funding process is available in the Frequently Asked Questions ("FAQs") available in the Accounting Support Fee section of the PCAOB's Web site (http://pcaobus.org/About/Administration/SupportFee/Pages/BDSupportFeeFAQ.aspx).
  • SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report

    SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report

    SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report Just2Trade 1900 L Street NW Suite 301 Washington, DC 20036 SEC-Required Report on Routing of Customers Orders For Quarter Ending March 31, 2014 Just2Trade has prepared this report pursuant to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule requiring all brokerage firms to make publicly available quarterly reports on their order routing practices. The report provides information on routing of "non-directed orders" - any order that the customer has not specifically instructed to be routed to a particular venue on behalf of its customers. The report is divided into four sections: one for securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange and reported as a Network A eligible security; one for securities listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market; one for securities listed on the American Stock Exchange or regional exchanges and reported as a Network B eligible security; and one for exchange-listed options. For each section, this report identifies the venues most often selected by Just2Trade, sets forth the percentage of various types of orders routed to the venues, and discusses the material aspects of Just2Trade's relationship with the venues. Securities Listed on New York Stock Exchange: SEC Rule 606 Report Non -directed orders as percentage of total customer orders 84.88% Market orders as percentage of total non-directed orders 22.90% Limit orders as percentage of total non-directed orders 72.26% Other orders as percentage of total non -directed orders 4.84% Venues Receiving Significant Percentage of Total Non-Directed Orders: LAMP 4.40% MAXM 47.33% PDQ 48.27% Information Concerning Significant Venues: 1.
  • Annual Report 2013

    Annual Report 2013

    Annual Report 2013 BinckBank N.V. Barbara Strozzilaan 310 1083 HN Amsterdam P.O. Box 75047 1070 AA Amsterdam t 020 606 26 66 f 020 320 41 76 e [email protected] i www.binck.nl 2 2013 Annual Report This document is a translation of the Dutch original and is provided as a courtesy only. In the event of any disparity, the Dutch version shall prevail. No rights may be derived from the translated document. Contents BinckBank overview 5 Corporate governance 109 Profile BinckBank 6 Introduction 110 Key figures 7 Developments in 2013 110 Key events in 2013 8 The Code 112 Chairman’s message 10 The Banking Code 116 Vision, mission, core values and strategic Article 10 of the Takeover Directive 117 objectives 12 Conclusion 117 Medium-term targets 17 Earnings model and SWOT analysis 18 Report of the supervisory board 119 BinckBank in a European context 21 Message by the chairman of Information for shareholders 22 the supervisory board 120 Financial calendar 2014 28 Duties of the supervisory board 121 Composition of the supervisory board 121 Report of the executive board 30 Meetings of the supervisory board and General information 32 subcommittees in 2013 121 Business unit Retail 36 Summary of the remuneration report 126 Business unit Professional Services 41 Loans granted to members of the Developments in legislation and regulation 43 executive board 129 Subsidiaries, joint ventures and assosiates 46 Remuneration of members of the Human Resources 48 supervisory board and subcommittees in 2013 129 Corporate social responsibility 52 Consultation with the
  • The Rise of Wealthtech

    The Rise of Wealthtech

    WWW.DRAKESTAR.COM JULY 2020 Sector Report THE RISE OF WEALTHTECH Julian Ostertag, Managing Partner and Christophe Morvan, Managing Partner Member of the Executive Committee [email protected] [email protected] +33 1700 876 10 +49 89 1490 265 20 Michael Metzger, Partner Antonia Georgieva, Partner [email protected] [email protected] +1 310 696 4011 +1 917 755 5518 Kasper Kruse Petersen, Partner [email protected] +44 203 2057 360 In the USA, all securities transacted through Drake Star Securities LLC. In the USA, Drake Star Securities LLC. Is regulated by FINRA and is a member of SIPC Drake Star Partners is the marketing name for the global investment bank Drake Star Partners Limited and its subsidiaries and affiliates. In the USA, all securities are transacted through Drake Star Securities LLC. In the USA, Drake Star Securities LLC is regulated by FINRA and is a member of SIPC. © 2020 Drake Star Partners. This report is published solely for informational purposes and is not to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. The information herein is based on sources we believe to be reliable but is not guaranteed by us and we assume no liability for its use. Any opinions expressed herein are statements of our judgment on this date and are subject to change without notice. Citations and sources are available upon request through https://www.drakestar.com/contact. Interviews were conducted by Drake Star Partners via email correspondence between March and May 2020.
  • SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report

    SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report

    SEC Rule 606 - Order Routing Report Just2Trade 1900 L Street NW Suite 301 Washington, DC 20036 SEC-Required Report on Routing of Customers Orders For Quarter Ending December 31, 2013 Just2Trade has prepared this report pursuant to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule requiring all brokerage firms to make publicly available quarterly reports on their order routing practices. The report provides information on routing of "non-directed orders" - any order that the customer has not specifically instructed to be routed to a particular venue on behalf of its customers. The report is divided into four sections: one for securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange and reported as a Network A eligible security; one for securities listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market; one for securities listed on the American Stock Exchange or regional exchanges and reported as a Network B eligible security; and one for exchange-listed options. For each section, this report identifies the venues most often selected by Just2Trade, sets forth the percentage of various types of orders routed to the venues, and discusses the material aspects of Just2Trade's relationship with the venues. Securities Listed on New York Stock Exchange: SEC Rule 606 Report Non -directed orders as percentage of total customer orders 86.30% Market orders as percentage of total non-directed orders 28.48% Limit orders as percentage of total non-directed orders 66.20% Other orders as percentage of total non -directed orders 5.33% Venues Receiving Significant Percentage of Total Non-Directed Orders: MAXM 88.92% PDQ 11.08% Information Concerning Significant Venues: 1.
  • DRAFT SPC Short Form FS Excel File 2020.Xlsx

    DRAFT SPC Short Form FS Excel File 2020.Xlsx

    Score Priority Corp. 1 Penn Plaza, 16th Floor New York, NY 10119 ****************************************** STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION DECEMBER 31, 2020 ****************************************** UNITEDSTATES OMB APPROVAL SECURITIESANDEXC HANGEC OMMISSION OMB Number: 3235-0123 Washington, D.C. 20549 Expi res: October 31, 2023 Estimated average burden ANNUAL AUDITED REPORT hours per response.. 12.00 FORM X-17A-5 SEC FILE NUMBER PART III 8- FACING PAGE Information Required of Brokers and Dealers Pursuant to Section 17 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 17a-5 Thereunder REPORT FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING______________________________ AND ENDING______________________________ MM/DD/YY MM/DD/YY A. REGISTRANT IDENTIFICATION NAME OF BROKER-DEALER: OFFICIAL USE ONLY ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS: (Do not use P.O. Box No.) FIRM I.D. NO. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (No. and Street) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (City) (State) (Zip Code) NAME AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO CONTACT IN REGARD TO THIS REPORT _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Area Code – Telephone Number) B. ACCOUNTANT IDENTIFICATION INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT whose opinion is contained in this Report* _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________