Penile Cancer Early Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging Detection and Diagnosis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Testicular Germ Cell Tumors in Men with Down's Syndrome
Central Annals of Mens Health and Wellness Bringing Excellence in Open Access Research Article *Corresponding author Jue Wang, Director of Genitourinary Oncology Section, University of Arizona Cancer Center at Dignity Health Testicular Germ Cell St. Joseph’s, Phoenix, AZ, 625 N 6th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, Tel: 1602-406-8222; Email: Tumors in Men with Down’s Submitted: 23 March 2018 Accepted: 29 March 2018 Syndrome: Delayed Diagnosis, Published: 31 March 2018 Copyright Comorbidities May Contribute © 2018 Wang et al. OPEN ACCESS to the Suboptimal Outcome Keywords • Testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) 1 2,3,4 Emma Weatherford and Jue Wang * • Down’s syndrome (DS) 1Baylor University, USA • Delayed diagnosis 2Creighton University School of Medicine at St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, • Seminoma USA • Non seminomatous germ cell tumor; Orchiectomy 3 St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, USA • Chemotherapy 4Department of Genitourinary Oncology, University of Arizona Cancer Center at • Prognosis Dignity Health St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, USA Abstract Purpose: The main objective of this study was to determine the clinical features, treatment and prognosis of Down’s syndrome (DS) patients with testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT). Materials and methods: We conducted a pooled analysis of 43 Down’s syndrome patients diagnosed with TGCT published in literature between January 1985 and December 2016. Results: The median age was 30 years (range 2 – 50). A majority of tumors (67%) were seminomas. 26 (51%) patients were diagnosed as stage I, 14 (33%) and 7 (16%) as stage II and III, respectively. In the seminoma group, 18 patients (62%) were diagnosed with stage I, 9 (31%) with stage II and 2 (7%) with stage III. -
U.S. Cancer Statistics: Male Urologic Cancers During 2013–2017, One of Three Cancers Diagnosed in Men Was a Urologic Cancer
Please visit the accessible version of this content at https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/uscs/about/data-briefs/no21-male-urologic-cancers.htm December 2020| No. 21 U.S. Cancer Statistics: Male Urologic Cancers During 2013–2017, one of three cancers diagnosed in men was a urologic cancer. Of 302,304 urologic cancers diagnosed each year, 67% were found in the prostate, 19% in the urinary bladder, 13% in the kidney or renal pelvis, and 3% in the testis. Incidence Male urologic cancer is any cancer that starts in men’s reproductive or urinary tract organs. The four most common sites where cancer is found are the prostate, urinary bladder, kidney or renal pelvis, and testis. Other sites include the penis, ureter, and urethra. Figure 1. Age-Adjusted Incidence Rates for 4 Common Urologic Cancers Among Males, by Racial/Ethnic Group, United States, 2013–2017 5.0 Racial/Ethnic Group Prostate cancer is the most common 2.1 Hispanic Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander urologic cancer among men in all 6.3 Testis Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native racial/ethnic groups. 1.5 Non-Hispanic Black 7.0 Non-Hispanic White 5.7 All Males Among non-Hispanic White and Asian/Pacific Islander men, bladder 21.8 11.4 cancer is the second most common and 29.4 kidney cancer is the third most Kidney and Renal Pelvis 26.1 common, but this order is switched 23.1 22.8 among other racial/ethnic groups. 18.6 • The incidence rate for prostate 14.9 cancer is highest among non- 21.1 Urinary Bladder 19.7 Hispanic Black men. -
Testicular Cancer Fact Sheet
SEXUAL HEALTH Testicular Cancer What You Should Know What is Testicular Cancer? • A feeling of weight in the testicles Testicular cancer happens when cells in the testicle grow to • A dull ache or pain in the testicle, scrotum or groin form a tumor. This is rare. More than 90 percent of testicular • Tenderness or changes in the male breast tissue cancers begin in the germ cells, which produce sperm. Learn how to do a testicular self-exam. Talk with your health There are two types of germ cell cancers (GCTs). Seminoma care provider as soon as you notice any of these signs. It’s can grow slowly and respond very well to radiation and common for men to avoid talking with their doctor about chemotherapy. Non-seminoma can grow more quickly and something like this. But don’t. The longer you delay, the can be less responsive to those treatments. There are a few more time the cancer has to spread. When found early, types of non-seminomas: choriocarcinomas, embryonal testicular cancer is curable. carcinomas, teratomas and yolk sac tumors. If you do have symptoms, your doctor should do a physical There are also rare testicular cancers that don’t form in the exam, an ultrasound and a tumor marker blood test. You germ cells. Leydig cell tumors form from the Leydig cells may be referred to a urologist for care. This is a surgeon that produce testosterone. Sertoli cell tumors arise from the who treats testicular cancer among other things. Sertoli cells that support normal sperm growth. Testicular cancer is not diagnosed with a standard biopsy The type of testicular cancer you have, your symptoms and (tissue sample) before surgery. -
Highlighting the Importance of Sexually Transmitted Disease Testing Upon Diagnosis of Penile Cancer: a Case Report
Case Study Clinical Case Reports International Published: 15 Jun, 2020 Highlighting the Importance of Sexually Transmitted Disease Testing Upon Diagnosis of Penile Cancer: A Case Report Médina Ndoye1, Lissoune Cisse1, Mark LaGreca2, Timothy Phillips2, Mark Siden2* and Matthew Weaver2 1Department of Urology, Idrissa Pouye General Hospital, Senegal 2Department of Medicine, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, USA Abstract There is a well-known association between Human Papillomavirus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus with penile cancer. Yet, it is not the standard of care to screen for either of these sexually transmitted diseases upon diagnosis of primary penile cancer. We present a 50 year old male who had a confirmed diagnosis of penile cancer for 2 years prior to his presentation to our clinic in Dakar, Senegal. Outside institutions repeatedly failed to screen the patient for sexually transmitted diseases, namely HPV and HIV. We share this case to emphasize the importance of sexually transmitted disease screening upon diagnosis of penile cancer with hopes to increase awareness in both developed and developing nations. We call for consensus in sexually transmitted disease screening guidelines upon penile cancer diagnoses. Keywords: Penile cancer; HPV; HIV; STD screening Introduction Primary penile cancer is a rare malignant overgrowth of cells, typically located on the glans or the internal prepuce of the penis. It has a worldwide incidence of 1/100,000 and most commonly affects males between the ages of 50 years to 70 years. Delayed diagnosis often yields significant OPEN ACCESS morbidity and mortality [1,2]. While penile cancer is uncommon in Europe and North America, the developing world has much higher rates of incidence up to 8 cases per 100,000 in some countries *Correspondence: [3]. -
Penile Cancer
Guidelines on Penile Cancer O.W. Hakenberg (chair), E. Compérat, S. Minhas, A. Necchi, C. Protzel, N. Watkin © European Association of Urology 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Publication history 4 1.2 Potential conflict of interest statement 4 2. METHODOLOGY 4 2.1 References 5 3. DEFINITION OF PENILE CANCER 5 4. EPIDEMIOLOGY 5 4.1 References 6 5. RISK FACTORS AND PREVENTION 7 5.1 References 8 6. TNM CLASSIFICATION AND PATHOLOGY 9 6.1 TNM classification 9 6.2 Pathology 10 6.2.1 References 13 7. DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING 15 7.1 Primary lesion 15 7.2 Regional lymph nodes 15 7.2.1 Non-palpable inguinal nodes 15 7.2.2 Palpable inguinal nodes 16 7.3 Distant metastases 16 7.4 Recommendations for the diagnosis and staging of penile cancer 16 7.5 References 16 8. TREATMENT 17 8.1 Treatment of the primary tumour 17 8.1.1 Treatment of superficial non-invasive disease (CIS) 18 8.1.2 Treatment of invasive disease confined to the glans (category Ta/T1a) 18 8.1.2.1 Results of different surgical organ-preserving treatment modalities 18 8.1.2.2 Summary of results of surgical techniques 19 8.1.2.3 Results of radiotherapy for T1 and T2 disease 19 8.1.3 Treatment of invasive disease confined to the corpus spongiosum/glans (Category T2) 20 8.1.4 Treatment of disease invading the corpora cavernosa and/or urethra (category T2/T3) 20 8.1.5 Treatment of locally advanced disease invading adjacent structures (category T3/T4) 20 8.1.6 Local recurrence after organ-conserving surgery 20 8.1.7 Recommendations for stage-dependent local treatment of penile carcinoma. -
Testicular Cancer Patient Guide Table of Contents Urology Care Foundation Reproductive & Sexual Health Committee
SEXUAL HEALTH Testicular Cancer Patient Guide Table of Contents Urology Care Foundation Reproductive & Sexual Health Committee Mike's Story . 3 CHAIR Introduction . 3 Arthur L . Burnett, II, MD GET THE FACTS How Do the Testicles Work? . 4 COMMITTEE MEMBERS What is Testicular Cancer? . 4 Ali A . Dabaja, MD What are the Symptoms of Testicular Cancer? . 4 Wayne J .G . Hellstrom MD, FACS What Causes Testicular Cancer? . 5 Stanton C . Honig, MD Who Gets Testicular Cancer? . 5 Akanksha Mehta, MD, MS GET DIAGNOSED Landon W . Trost, MD Testicular Self-Exam . 5 Medical Exams . 5 Staging . 6 GET TREATED Surveillance . 7 Surgery . 7 Radiation . 7 Chemotherapy . 8 Future Treatment . 8 CHILDREN WITH TESTICULAR CANCER Get Children Diagnosed . 8 Treatment for Children . 8 Children after Treatment . 8 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Risk for Return . 9 Sex Life and Fertility . 9 Heart Disease Risk . 9 Questions to Ask Your Doctor . 9 GLOSSARY ................................. 10 2 Mike's Story Mike’s urologist offered him three choices for treatment: radiation therapy, chemotherapy or the lesser-known option (at the time) of active surveillance . He was asked what he wanted to do . Because Mike is a pharmacist, he was invested in doing his own research to figure out what was best . Luckily, Mike chose active surveillance . This saved him from dealing with side effects . Eventually, he knew he needed to get testicular cancer surgery . That 45-minute procedure to remove his testicle from his groin was all he needed to be cancer-free . Mike’s fears went away . For the next five years he chose active surveillance with CT scans, chest x-rays and tumor marker blood tests . -
A Current Update on Human Papillomavirus-Associated Head and Neck Cancers
viruses Review A Current Update on Human Papillomavirus-Associated Head and Neck Cancers Ebenezer Tumban Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-906-487-2256; Fax: +1-906-487-3167 Received: 16 September 2019; Accepted: 4 October 2019; Published: 9 October 2019 Abstract: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the cause of a growing percentage of head and neck cancers (HNC); primarily, a subset of oral squamous cell carcinoma, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The majority of HPV-associated head and neck cancers (HPV + HNC) are caused by HPV16; additionally, co-factors such as smoking and immunosuppression contribute to the progression of HPV + HNC by interfering with tumor suppressor miRNA and impairing mediators of the immune system. This review summarizes current studies on HPV + HNC, ranging from potential modes of oral transmission of HPV (sexual, self-inoculation, vertical and horizontal transmissions), discrepancy in the distribution of HPV + HNC between anatomical sites in the head and neck region, and to studies showing that HPV vaccines have the potential to protect against oral HPV infection (especially against the HPV types included in the vaccines). The review concludes with a discussion of major challenges in the field and prospects for the future: challenges in diagnosing HPV + HNC at early stages of the disease, measures to reduce discrepancy in the prevalence of HPV + HNC cases between anatomical sites, and suggestions to assess whether fomites/breast milk can transmit HPV to the oral cavity. Keywords: HPV; oral transmission; head and neck cancers; HPV vaccines; HIV and AIDS; head and neck cancer treatment 1. -
Prostate and Testicular Cancer Program
State of Illinois Pat Quinn, Governor Department of Public Health Damon T. Arnold, M.D., M.P.H., Director Prostate and Testicular Cancer Program Report to the Illinois General Assembly July 2009 Report to the General Assembly Public Act 90-599 – Prostate and Testicular Cancer Program Public Act 91-0109 – Prostate Cancer Screening Program State of Illinois Pat Quinn, Governor Illinois Department of Public Health Illinois Department of Public Health Office of Health Promotion Division of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control 535 West Jefferson Street Springfield, Illinois 62761-0001 Report Period - Fiscal Year 2009 July 2009 1 Table of Contents I. Background.………………………………………………………….…...3 . II. Executive Summary………………………………………………..……...3 III. The Problem……………………………………………….………….…...3 IV. Illinois Prostate and Testicular Cancer Program Components…….……...6 V. Screening, Education and Awareness Grants………………………….….6 VI. Public Awareness Efforts…………………………………….………..….9 VII. Future Challenges and Opportunities…..………………….………..…...10 2 I. Background The primary goal of the Illinois Prostate and Testicular Cancer Program is to improve the lives of men across their life span by initiating, facilitating and coordinating prostate and testicular cancer awareness and screening programs throughout the state. On June 25, 1998, Public Act 90-599 established the Illinois Prostate and Testicular Cancer Program, and required the Illinois Department of Public Health (Department), subject to appropriation or other available funding, to promote awareness and early detection of prostate and testicular cancer. On July 13, 1999, Public Act 91-0109 required the Department to establish a Prostate Cancer Screening Program and to adopt rules to implement the program. In addition, the Department received an appropriation of $300,000 “for all expenses associated with the Prostate Cancer Awareness and Screening Program.” The fiscal year 2009 appropriation was $297,000. -
NCCN Guidelines for Penile Cancer from Version 1.2019 Include
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Penile Cancer Version 2.2019 — May 13, 2019 NCCN.org Continue Version 2.2019, 05/13/19 © 2019 National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®), All rights reserved. The NCCN Guidelines® and this illustration may not be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of NCCN. NCCN Guidelines Index NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2019 Table of Contents Penile Cancer Discussion *Thomas W. Flaig, MD †/Chair Harry W. Herr, MD ϖ Sumanta K. Pal, MD † University of Colorado Cancer Center Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center City of Hope National Medical Center *Philippe E. Spiess, MD, MS ϖ/Vice Chair Christopher Hoimes, MD † Anthony Patterson, MD ϖ Moffitt Cancer Center Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/ St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital/ University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center The University of Tennessee Neeraj Agarwal, MD ‡ † and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute Health Science Center Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah Brant A. Inman, MD, MSc ϖ Elizabeth R. Plimack, MD, MS † Duke Cancer Institute Fox Chase Cancer Center Rick Bangs, MBA Patient Advocate Masahito Jimbo, MD, PhD, MPH Þ Kamal S. Pohar, MD ϖ University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center The Ohio State University Comprehensive Stephen A. Boorjian, MD ϖ Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital Mayo Clinic Cancer Center A. Karim Kader, MD, PhD ϖ and Solove Research Institute UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center Mark K. Buyyounouski, MD, MS § Michael P. Porter, MD, MS ϖ Stanford Cancer Institute Subodh M. Lele, MD ≠ Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/ Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center Sam Chang, MD ¶ Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Joshua J. -
Prognostic Significance of HPV and P16 Status in Men Diagnosed with Penile Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published OnlineFirst July 9, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0322 Review Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers Prognostic Significance of HPV and p16 Status in & Prevention Men Diagnosed with Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Freja Lærke Sand1, Christina Louise Rasmussen1, Marie Hoffmann Frederiksen2, Klaus Kaae Andersen2, and Susanne K. Kjaer1,3 Abstract It has been shown that human papillomavirus (HPV) of DSS, we included 649 men with penile cancer tested for and p16 status has prognostic value in some HPV-associ- HPV (27% were HPV-positive) and 404 men tested for p16 ated cancers. However, studies examining survival in men expression (47% were p16-positive). The pooled HRHPV of with penile cancer according to HPV or p16 status are often DSS was 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38–0.98], inconclusive, mainly because of small study populations. andthepooledHRp16 of DSS was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.30– The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to 0.69). In conclusion, men with HPV or p16-positive penile examine the association between HPV DNA and p16 status cancer have a significantly more favorable DSS compared and survival in men diagnosed with penile cancer. Multi- with men with HPV or p16-negative penile cancer. These ple electronic databases were searched. Twenty studies findings point to the possible clinical value of HPV and were ultimately included and study-specific and pooled p16 testing when planning the most optimal management HRs of overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) and follow-up strategy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(10); 1– were calculated using a fixed effects model. -
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer and the Human Papillomavirus
MONOGRAPH HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CANCER AND THE HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS: SUMMARY OF A NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE STATE OF THE SCIENCE MEETING, NOVEMBER 9–10, 2008, WASHINGTON, D.C. David J. Adelstein, MD,1 John A. Ridge, MD, PhD,2 Maura L. Gillison, MD, PhD,3 Anil K. Chaturvedi, PhD,4 Gypsyamber D’Souza, PhD,5 Patti E. Gravitt, PhD,5 William Westra, MD,6 Amanda Psyrri, MD, PhD,7 W. Martin Kast, PhD,8 Laura A. Koutsky, PhD,9 Anna Giuliano, PhD,10 Steven Krosnick, MD,4 Andy Trotti, MD,10 David E. Schuller, MD,3 Arlene Forastiere, MD,6 Claudio Dansky Ullmann, MD4 1 Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 3 Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio 4 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 5 Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 6 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 7 Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 8 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 9 University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 10 H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida Accepted 14 August 2009 Published online 29 September 2009 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/hed.21269 VC 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 31: 1393–1422, 2009* Keywords: human papillomavirus; head and neck squamous Correspondence to: D. J. Adelstein cell cancer; state of the science Contract grant sponsor: NIH. Gypsyamber D’Souza is an advisory board member and received For the purpose of clinical trials, head and neck research funding from Merck Co. -
Risk Factors for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis— Population-Based Case-Control Study in Denmark
2683 Risk Factors for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis— Population-Based Case-Control Study in Denmark Birgitte Schu¨tt Madsen,1 Adriaan J.C. van den Brule,2 Helle Lone Jensen,3 Jan Wohlfahrt,1 and Morten Frisch1 1Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Department of Pathology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam and Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology, PAMM Laboratories, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands;and 3Department of Pathology, Gentofte University Hospital, Niels Andersens Vej 65, Hellerup, Denmark Abstract Few etiologic studies of squamous cell carcinoma female sex partners, number of female sex partners (SCC) of the penis have been carried out in populations before age 20, age at first intercourse, penile-oral sex, a where childhood circumcision is rare. A total of 71 history of anogenital warts, and never having used patients with invasive (n = 53) or in situ (n = 18) penile condoms. Histories of phimosis and priapism at least 5 SCC, 86 prostate cancer controls, and 103 population years before diagnosis were also significant risk controls were interviewed in a population-based case- factors, whereas alcohol abstinence was associated control study in Denmark. For 37 penile SCC patients, with reduced risk. Our study confirms sexually tissue samples were PCR examined for human papil- transmitted HPV16 infection and phimosis as major lomavirus (HPV) DNA. Overall, 65% of PCR-examined risk factors for penile SCC and suggests that penile- penile SCCs were high-risk HPV-positive, most of oral sex may be an important means of viral transmis- which (22 of 24; 92%) were due to HPV16.