CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 F. No.CIC/YA/C/2016/000183 CIC/YA/C/2016/000184 Date of Hearing : 04.11.2016 Date of Decision : 04.11.2016 Appellant/Complainant : Shri Pramodesh Saxena, Ghaziabad (U.P.) Respondent : CPIO, North Delhi Municipal Corporation Through: Shri R K Madan, CPIO Information Commissioner : Shri Yashovardhan Azad Since common parties are involved in the present appeals, they are being clubbed together for hearing and disposal to avoid multiplicity of the proceedings. Relevant facts emerging from appeal: Case No. RTI filed on CPIO reply First appeal FAA order 2nd appeal filed filed on 0183 25.02.2015 No reply Did not file No order 10.06.2016 FA passed 0184 15.02.2015 No reply Did not file No order 10.06.2016 FA passed CIC/YA/C/2016/000183 Information sought and background of the case: The complainant vide RTI application dated 25.02.2015 sought information under 11 points regarding representation for regular promotion. CPIO did not reply to the RTI application. The complainant preferred first appeal. Feeling aggrieved the complainant approached the Commission. CIC/YA/C/2016/000184 Information sought and background of the case: The complainant vide RTI application dated 15.02.2015 sought information under 10 points regarding grant of benefit of increment upon the promotion to the next higher scale in r/o Medical Officers working in MCD. CPIO did not respond to the RTI application. Feeling aggrieved the complainant approached the Commission. Relevant facts emerging during hearing: The complainant is absent despite service of advance notice. The respondent is present and states that complainant sought information regarding promotion related representation/s by his wife Dr. Ritu Saxena. It has been submitted before the Commission that information has been provided to the complainant vide letter dated 23.06.2016 and despite being called for inspection, the Complainant has not availed of the option of inspecting the records. Decision: After hearing the respondent and perusal of record, the Commission finds that the information sought by the complainant has already been provided. The applicant has chosen neither to inspect the files nor to present the case before the Commission during the hearing today. The appellant happens to be seeking on behalf of his wife, but it seems he is not serious in his pursuit of the information. There appears no reason for any further action in these matters. Both the complaints are dismissed accordingly. (Yashovardhan Azad) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this Commission. (R.P.Grover) Designated Officer Copy to:- Public Information Officer under RTI Public Information Officer under RTI Nodal Officer – CED / HQ., Superintendent – RTI Cell / HQ., North Delhi Municipal Corporation, North Delhi Municipal Corporation, Central Establishment Department, RTI Department, Central Office, 13th Floor, Dr. S.P.M. Civic Centre, Dr. S. P. M. Civic Centre, Minto Road, New Delhi-110002. Minto Road, New Delhi-110002. Shri Pramodesh Saxena House No. : F-1054, Gaur Green City, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad-201010 (U.P.). .