DOCSLIB.ORG

Jeffrey Eli Pearson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jeffrey Eli Pearson Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture By Jeffrey Eli Pearson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Erich Gruen, Chair Chris Hallett Andrew Stewart Benjamin Porter Spring 2011 Abstract Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture by Jeffrey Eli Pearson Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Erich Gruen, Chair The Nabataeans, best known today for the spectacular remains of their capital at Petra in southern Jordan, continue to defy easy characterization. Since they lack a surviving narrative history of their own, in approaching the Nabataeans one necessarily relies heavily upon the commentaries of outside observers, such as the Greeks, Romans, and Jews, as well as upon comparisons of Nabataean material culture with Classical and Near Eastern models. These approaches have elucidated much about this enigmatic civilization but have not always fully succeeded in locating specifically Nabataean motivations and perspectives within and behind the sources. To address this lacuna, my dissertation provides a critical re-reading and analysis of the ancient evidence, including literary, documentary, numismatic, epigraphic, art historical, and archaeological material, in order to explore the Nabataeans’ reaction to, effect upon, and engagement with, historical events and cultural movements during the period from 312 BCE, when the Nabataeans first appear in the historical record in the wake of the conquests of Alexander the Great, to the annexation of their territory by the Romans in 106 CE. I seek to properly acknowledge the ways in which the Nabataeans self-consciously shaped their own political and cultural destinies while interacting with the broader Mediterranean and Near Eastern worlds. While identification, analysis, and articulation of the Nabataean viewpoint guides the dissertation, the project also broadly challenges or qualifies several important assumptions about the Nabataean civilization. In treating the period from 312 BCE to the eastern settlement of Pompey in 63 BCE, I argue that the Nabataeans played a more important role in the Hellenistic world than has generally been acknowledged— especially for the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE—and I articulate the nature and significance of their position vis-à-vis their neighbors and rivals, both regional and further a-field, specifically from the Nabataean point of view. This analysis makes an important contribution to current discussions of the development of Nabataean identity and culture, and it can serve as a model for viewing other under-explored Hellenistic civilizations in the Near East. Events in the ensuing period, after 63 BCE, take place under the broad shadow of the extension of Roman power in the eastern Mediterranean, but by analyzing internationally important events of this period, such as the Roman expedition to Arabia ordered by Augustus, from a specifically Nabataean vantage point, I am able to show that 1 the Nabataeans’ self-interest often did not align with Roman objectives, and that their foreign policy flourished on its own merits. These conclusions appropriately acknowledge Nabataean individuality and autonomy, challenging the widely asserted notion that Nabataea fits a prescribed model of a client—or dependent—state of Rome. In examining the last generations of Nabataean independence, I argue against the traditional characterization that sees during these years a gradual political, economic, and cultural decline for the Nabataeans, culminating in their annexation by the Romans in 106 CE. I demonstrate that the period instead represents a time of increasing sophistication and self- confidence on the part of the Nabataeans, not one of resignation or submission to the inevitability of Roman domination. 2 Meis Parentibus i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements . iii List of Figures . iv Introduction . 1 Chapter 1: The Nabataeans and the Early Hellenistic Context . 5 Chapter 2: The Nabataeans and the Late Hellenistic Context . 24 Chapter 3: Aretas IV and the Nabataean Kingdom, 9 BCE to 40 CE . 42 Chapter 4: The Last Decades of Nabataean Independence, 40 to 106 CE . 64 Conclusion . 83 Bibliography . 85 Appendix: Map and Figures . 95 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I could not have completed a project of this scope without the considerable support, guidance, and encouragement I received along the way. I have been very fortunate in having so many outstanding teachers during the course of my academic studies. I begin by acknowledging my professors at Villanova University, especially Daniel Doyle, Ed Jaworowski, John Hunt, and the late Effie Coughanowr, and those at St. Andrews and Cambridge Universities, especially Christopher Smith, John Patterson, and Christopher Kelly. During my doctoral studies at Berkeley, I have studied and worked with many incredible professors, but I would like to particularly thank several for sharing some of the depth and breadth of their knowledge, for their infectious enthusiasm, and for their advice and counsel to me as an aspiring scholar: Sonia Shiri, Mark Griffith, Todd Hickey, Andrew Stewart, Chris Hallett, and Benjamin Porter. These latter three also served as members of my dissertation committee and provided me with invaluable feedback on various drafts of the project. All chapters in this dissertation also at some stage received careful scrutiny from a working group consisting of fellow PhD candidates in AHMA and Classics. During our colloquia, Nandini Pandey, Noah Kaye, Ryan Boehm, Tim Doran, Carolynn Roncaglia, Amy Russell, David Rosenberg-Wohl, Greg Smay, and Jason Schlude all helped to improve my arguments and to clarify my thinking with their careful readings, critiques, and insightful suggestions. I am extremely appreciative. My dissertation chair, Erich Gruen, presided over these meetings, generously opening up his house for the occasions and sharing his wisdom, experience, and great knowledge of the ancient world. He has been for me, as for so many others, both an exacting critic and a fierce advocate. I could not have wished for a better teacher and mentor. I also thank the Graduate Group in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology for its financial assistance, especially in the form of grants for archaeological work, language study, and travel in the Near East. The tireless members of the departmental staff, especially Janet Yonan and Nancy Lichtenstein, also have my fond appreciation for all the help, kind words, and advice they have provided over the years. Finally and most importantly, I am extremely grateful to my close friends and family. I give special mention here to Jason Schlude, Jordan Bulger, Ginelle Hustrulid, Nicole Robinson, to my brother Tommy, and to my parents, who know me best, who understand the true value of a good education, and who have always believed in me. iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Coin of Aretas III Philhellenos 96 Figure 2: Coin of Alexander Jannaeus 96 Figure 3: Coin of M. Scaurus with Aretas III 96 Figure 4: Coin of Obodas II 97 Figure 5: Coin of Aretas IV and Syllaios 97 Figure 6: Coin of Aretas IV with Laurel Wreath 97 Figure 7: Coin of Rabbel II 98 Figure 8: The Khazneh (the “Treasury”), Petra 98 Figure 9: Al-Dayr (the “Monastery”), Petra 99 Figure 10: Crenellated Tombs, Petra 99 Figure 11: Nabataean Painted Bowl from Phase 3b 100 iv INTRODUCTION For at least four centuries, from the days of the Successors of Alexander the Great in the late 4th century BCE until the last meaningful eastern expansion of the Roman empire under the emperor Trajan at the beginning of the 2nd century CE, a partially nomadic and highly prosperous civilization governed a capacious territory stretching at its height from the Hawran in southern Syria to the Arabian Hejaz and including large parts of the Negev, Sinai, and eastern Jordanian desert, while consistently occupying an important place in the ancient Mediterranean political, cultural, and economic landscapes. With such a resume, this people ought to be well known, understood, and appreciated, but replying “the Nabataeans” to a query about the subject of one’s dissertation will, more than likely, elicit a quizzical look from the interlocutor. Numerous recent museum exhibitions, cameo appearances of their monuments in modern cinema, increased access for archaeologists and tourists to remains of their culture in previously off-limits or politically fraught areas of Jordan, Syria, and even Saudi Arabia, and—not least—the recent designation of their ancient capital of Petra as one of the new seven wonders of the world, have certainly helped in raising the Nabataean profile. Still, while a serious academic discussion of ancient trade, water management, Semitic linguistics, or Alexandrian-inspired architecture might now be expected to include the Nabataeans, this fascinating civilization remains, even to the general scholar of the ancient Mediterranean world, highly enigmatic, perplexing, and often surprising. For both political and academic reasons, in particular the traditional (and largely artificial) boundaries that have often persisted between disciplines interested in the ancient Classical and Near Eastern worlds, the Nabataeans long languished in relative obscurity. This situation has fortunately
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visual Storytelling: Iconography and Manipulation of History on the Scaurus-Aretas Coins
    Visual Storytelling: Iconography and Manipulation of History on the Scaurus-Aretas Coins In 58 BCE, aedile Marcus Aemilius Scaurus minted a coin which named “Rex Aretas” and depicted him in a submissive posture. The intent of this iconography was to illustrate the victory of Pompey and Scaurus over the Nabataean King, Aretas III, during their campaigns in the Near East in the late 60s BCE. The image was completed with a camel standing in the background, confirming the foreign and exotic nature of King Aretas and his Nabataean Arabs (Figure 1). However, this posture of submission seems to be nothing more than creative storytelling. The historical record of Pompey and Scaurus’ victories over Nabataea is not clear and arguments can convincingly be made that Nabataea was never defeated by the Romans up to this point (Schmid 2009). While Pompey return to Rome to celebrate his third triumph, his general, Scaurus, was left behind with two legions as the governor of Syria and intended to ensure peace in the region after Pompey’s reorganization. In same year (62 BCE), Scaurus led his forces into Nabataean territory and attempted to seize the capital of Petra. He was largely unsuccessful, failing entirely to take the famous red-rock city. Aretas III was persuaded by Hyrcanus of Judea to pay Scaurus to withdraw – agreeing to give the Roman 300 talents of silver to leave the land unmolested further. Scaurus accepted the payment (or bribe) and withdrew. No evidence of any official surrender or subjugation exists. Scaurus went on to move up the cursus honorum and became aedile (58 BCE), praetor (56 BCE), and eventually propraetor (55 BCE).
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffrey Eli Pearson
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4dx9g1rj Author Pearson, Jeffrey Eli Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture By Jeffrey Eli Pearson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Erich Gruen, Chair Chris Hallett Andrew Stewart Benjamin Porter Spring 2011 Abstract Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture by Jeffrey Eli Pearson Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Erich Gruen, Chair The Nabataeans, best known today for the spectacular remains of their capital at Petra in southern Jordan, continue to defy easy characterization. Since they lack a surviving narrative history of their own, in approaching the Nabataeans one necessarily relies heavily upon the commentaries of outside observers, such as the Greeks, Romans, and Jews, as well as upon comparisons of Nabataean material culture with Classical and Near Eastern models. These approaches have elucidated much about this
    [Show full text]
  • Julia Wilker University of Pennsylvania
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 25 (2018): 127–145 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.18.007.8927 www.ejournals.eu/electrum BETWEEN EMPIRES AND PEERS: HASMONEAN FOREIGN POLICY UNDER ALEXANDER JANNAEUS Julia Wilker University of Pennsylvania Abstract: During the reign of Alexander Jannaeus (103–76 BCE), Judea underwent a number of signifi cant changes. This article explores one of them: the fundamental shift in foreign policy strategy. This shift becomes most apparent in the king’s decision to not renew the alliance with Rome, which had been a hallmark of Hasmonean foreign policy since the days of Judas Mac- cabaeus. However, a close analysis of Alexander Jannaeus’ policy regarding other foreign powers demonstrates that the end of the Judean-Roman alliance did not happen in a vacuum. It is shown that under Alexander Jannaeus, the Hasmonean state adopted a different strategy towards imperial powers by focusing on deescalation and ignorance rather than alliances. In contrast, interactions with other rising states in the vicinity, such as the Nabateans and Itureans, increased. This new orientation in foreign policy refl ected changes in Hasmonean identity and self-defi nition; Judea did not need imperial support to maintain its independence anymore but strived to increase its status as a regional power. Key words: Hasmoneans, Alexander Jannaeus, Jewish-Roman relations, foreign relations. The reign of Alexander Jannaeus (103–76 BCE) constituted a seminal period in the his- tory of Hellenistic Judea; his rule signifi es both the acme and a turning point of the Has- monean state. The length of his tenure as king – second only to that of his father, John Hyrcanus (135–105/104 BCE) – stands in signifi cant contrast to that of his predecessor, Aristobulus I, who died after having ruled for less than a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffrey Eli Pearson
    Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture By Jeffrey Eli Pearson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Erich Gruen, Chair Chris Hallett Andrew Stewart Benjamin Porter Spring 2011 Abstract Contextualizing the Nabataeans: A Critical Reassessment of their History and Material Culture by Jeffrey Eli Pearson Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Erich Gruen, Chair The Nabataeans, best known today for the spectacular remains of their capital at Petra in southern Jordan, continue to defy easy characterization. Since they lack a surviving narrative history of their own, in approaching the Nabataeans one necessarily relies heavily upon the commentaries of outside observers, such as the Greeks, Romans, and Jews, as well as upon comparisons of Nabataean material culture with Classical and Near Eastern models. These approaches have elucidated much about this enigmatic civilization but have not always fully succeeded in locating specifically Nabataean motivations and perspectives within and behind the sources. To address this lacuna, my dissertation provides a critical re-reading and analysis of the ancient evidence, including literary, documentary, numismatic, epigraphic, art historical, and archaeological material, in order to explore the Nabataeans’ reaction to, effect upon, and engagement with, historical events and cultural movements during the period from 312 BCE, when the Nabataeans first appear in the historical record in the wake of the conquests of Alexander the Great, to the annexation of their territory by the Romans in 106 CE.
    [Show full text]
  • A Criticism of the New Chronology of Paul. Ii. We
    351 A CRITICISM OF THE NEW CHRONOLOGY OF PAUL. II. WE have seen that the positive argument of 0. Holtzmann is worthless.1 Those of Harnack and McGiffert, in so far as they rest upon it, must of course be equally so. But is Holtzmann's negative argument trustworthy, which dis~ misses as unavailable all other synchronisms than his own'? for herein he is again followed by Harnack and McGiffert. If so, then we have no more to do than simply to weigh the authority of Eusebius in the form of text established by Harnack against the objections of Lightfoot, Schurer and others and decide accordingly. If, however, we are convinced, with Ramsay, that there is light to be had from the synchronisms of the older chronographers, when pro­ perly employed, our decision may be modified, or even wholly determined by these. A synchronism, for example, which might well seem utt~rly fatal to the Eusebian chronology, is that of 2 Corin­ thians xi. 32, 33, taken together with Acts ix. 23-25 and Galatians i. 18, and adjusted to the known facts regarding Aretas IV., surnamed no.v cni = 4itft..oft..ao~, king of the Nabateans, who reigned from B.c. 9 till A.D. 40. As to these facts we cannot do better than to transcribe from the careful excursus of Schurer (l.c. I. ii. p. 357) on the History of the N abatean Kings : " From the long reign of Aretas only a few incidents belonging to its latest period have come down to us. The tetrarch Herod Antipas had 1 Since the MS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armies of the Hasmonaeans and Herod
    Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum herausgegeben von Martin Hengel und Peter Schäfer 25 The Armies of the Hasmonaeans and Herod From Hellenistic to Roman Frameworks by Israel Shatzman J.C.B. Möhr (Paul Siebeck) Tübingen Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Shatzman, Israel: The armies of the Hasmonaeans and Herod : from Hellenistic to Roman frameworks / by Israel Shatzman. - Tübingen : Mohr, 1991 (Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum ; 25) ISBN 3-16-145617-3 NE: GT © 1991 J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) P.O. Box 2040, D-7400 Tübingen. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to re- productions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was typeset by Sam Boyd Enterprise in Singapore, printed by Guide-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper by Gebr. Buhl in Ettlingen and bound by Heinr. Koch in Tübingen. ISSN 0721-8753 MENAHEM STERN IN MEMORIAM Preface I became intrigued by the subject of this book in the course of my work on the military confrontation between the Jews and the Romans from the death of Herod to the War of Bar-Kokhva, which I was asked to contribute to Vol. VIII of the series The World History of the Jewish People: U. Rappaport (ed.), Judea and Rome (Masada Publishing Press, 1983, in Hebrew). While working on those chapters, I realized that no com- prehensive account had ever been written of the army of Herod, and as for the Hasmonaeans, there existed then only B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silver Mint of Damascus Under Demetrius III and Antiochus XII (97/6 BC–83/2 BC) Plates Oliver D
    AJN Second Series 20 (2008) pp. 00–00 © 2008 The American Numismatic Society The Silver Mint of Damascus under Demetrius III and Antiochus XII (97/6 BC–83/2 BC) Plates Oliver D. Hoover,* Arthur Houghton,** and Petr Veselý*** [abstract] Introduction In 1939, Edward T. Newell, one of the great presidents of the American Numis- matic Society and the father of systematic Seleucid numismatic study, presented his findings on the coinages of Demetrius III and Antiochus XII struck at Da- mascus as part of his monograph, Late Seleucid Mints in Ake-Ptolemaïs and Da- mascus. This important catalogue included twenty-two specimens for the reign of Demetrius III and three for that of Antiochus XII. Recent discoveries have now increased the number of known Damascene tetradrachms for these rulers more than fourfold. The existence of previously unknown silver fractions of Demetrius III has also been revealed. In light of these new developments it is useful almost seventy years after Newell to develop a full die study for these interesting late Seleucid coinages. *[email protected] 203 204 Oliver D. Hoover, Arthur Houghton, and Petr Veselý Die Usage The evidence of die usage for Demetrius III indicates that his Damascene tet- radrachms were a modest coinage for the period. A single obverse die is known for SE 216 (97/6 BC), possibly indicating that the reign of Demetrius III did not begin until late in the year. Counting all dies used in a particular year, five dies have been identified for SE 217 (96/5 BC), 3 for SE 218 (95/4 BC), 4 for SE 219 (94/3 BC), 2 for SE 221 (92/1 BC), 8 for SE 222 (91/0 BC), 3 for SE 223 (90/89 BC), 2 for SE 224 (89/8 BC), and 2 for SE 225 (88/7 BC).
    [Show full text]
  • ACOR Newsletter Vol. 27.1
    Volume 27.1 Summer 2015 �e Nabataean, Roman, Byzantine, and Early Islamic Site of Humayma: A Look Back on �ree Decades of Research John P. Oleson, M. Barbara Reeves, and Rebecca M. Foote Most motorists on their way to Wadi Ramm or Aqaba zoom by the unassuming turnoff to Humayma on the Desert Highway, unaware that Humayma is among Jordan’s most interesting and informative archaeological sites. Humayma is located in the northwest corner of the Hisma Desert approximately 80 km south of Petra and 80 km north of Aqaba. Today it can be reached by a 20-minute car or bus excursion offtheDesertHighway.Inancienttimes, the site was located on the ancient King’s Highway, rebuilt in the early 2nd century a.d. as the Via Nova Traiana. Aerial photo of Humayma looking north (photo by Jane Taylor); all images courtesy of the Humayma Excavation Project unless otherwise noted Since the 1980s, several teams of archaeologists have focused �eNabataeanthroughUmayyadse�lementsareconcentrated on Humayma’s ancient remains, each from a slightly differentpoint in a one kilometer square area on the desert plain bordered on the of view. Prehistoric sites on the surrounding jebels were studied by west and northwest by sandstone hills and ridges which were also Donald Henry’s team in the early 1980s, leading to the discovery used for human activities. From the 1st century b.c. until the mid-8th of many tool sca�ers and a new “Qalkhan assemblage.” century a.d., Humayma (in Nabataean, Hawara; in Greek, Auara; �e Nabataean through early Islamic se�lement on the plain in Latin, Hauarra; in Arabic, al-Humayma) was a bustling desert was �rstprobedbyJohnEadie,DavidGraf,andJohnP.Olesonin trading post, military strongpoint, and caravan waystation.
    [Show full text]
  • NABATEAN CIVILIZATION PROFILE Version 0.2, by Ismael Silva (A.K.A
    NABATEAN CIVILIZATION PROFILE Version 0.2, by Ismael Silva (a.k.a. Aghilas) and Atenmeses52 Email: [email protected] Civ Emblem: • Historical Period: Although the Nabataeans were literate, they left no lengthy historical texts. However, there are thousands of inscriptions still found today in several places where they once lived; including graffiti and on their minted coins. The first historical reference to the Nabataeans is by Greek historian Diodorus Siculus who lived around 30 BC, but he includes some 300 years earlier information about them. • The Twelve Sons of Ishmael: Nebaioth, Qedar, Adbeel, Mibsam, Mishma, Dumah, Massa, Hadad, Tema, Jetur, Naphish, Kedemah. • Civilization Overview: The Nabataeans, also Nabateans, were an Arab people who inhabited northern Arabia and the Southern Levant, and whose settlements, most prominently the assumed capital city of Raqmu, now called Petra, in AD 37 – c. 100, gave the name of Nabatene to the borderland between Arabia and Syria, from the Euphrates to the Red Sea. Their loosely controlled trading network, which centered on strings of oases that they controlled, where agriculture was intensively practiced in limited areas, and on the routes that linked them, had no securely defined boundaries in the surrounding desert.Trajan conquered the Nabataean kingdom, annexing it to the Roman Empire, where their individual culture, easily identified by their characteristic finely potted painted ceramics, became dispersed in the general Greco-Roman culture and was eventually lost. They were later converted to Christianity. Jane Taylor, a writer, describes them as "one of the most gifted peoples of the ancient world". • Notes on Warfare: Hence we come to a lightly armoured but swift-moving force which was used for raiding or fighting off raiders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nabateans in the Hauran Shimon Dar, Bar Ilan University
    The Nabateans in the Hauran Shimon Dar, Bar Ilan University Geography produce dedicatory inscriptions that mention their kings into the The Hauran is a basaltic region in the northeast of the Land of Roman period and after the annexation of their kingdom to the Israel, called in ancient sources Bashan. The Hauran is the most Roman Empire in 106 CE. fertile area in all of Transjordan, its rich soil and copious rainfall Over 70 Nabatean inscriptions have been found in the have enabled agriculture to flourish throughout the ages. Hauran, in some 50 settlements mainly in southern Hauran and The Hauran is divided into a number of sub-regions, including in the Hauran Heights (Starcky 1985: 174–176). The Nabateans the Golan, the Bashan Plain (el Nukra) the Hauran Heights or also sent settlers in the direction of the Golan, as evidenced by Bashan (Jebel Druz), and Trachon (Leja). Some scholars also a dedicatory inscription to the god Dushara found in the area include Iturea, which lies to the north of the Golan and includes of Susita-Hippos (Ovadiah 1981: 101). areas from the Hermon Mountains to the Beqa‘a Valley in Wars between Nabateans and Jews also involved Transjordan Lebanon (Fig. 103). and the Hauran (Negev 1983: 46–52). The main disputes, over control of territories and economic interests in Transjordan and Historical Background the Hauran, took place during the reign of the Hasmonean king During the Hellenistic period a wide variety of peoples and tribes Alexander Jannaeus and the Nabatean kings Obodas I and Aretas lived in the Hauran, speaking Aramaic, Arabic, Nabatean, Hebrew, III (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Herodian Marriage and the Construction of Identity James Windsor Donaldson BA (Hons), MA Qld; Gdipmusmst Deakin
    Herodian Marriage and the Construction of Identity James Windsor Donaldson BA (Hons), MA Qld; GDipMusmSt Deakin A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of History, Philosophy, Religion and Classics Abstract The Herodian family drew on multiple identities in order to consolidate their power and influence at home and abroad. This thesis investigates the family’s construction of identity through the institution of marriage. It is situated within the context of ongoing discussions over the nature of identity construction in the ancient world, the influence of Greek and Roman culture in Judea, and the way that Jewish marriage restrictions were understood and practised. Drawing upon Flavius Josephus as its primary source, this thesis uses prosopographical methods to collect and analyse marriage relationships in the Herodian family. While previous studies have touched on topics of alliance and family reconciliation, this research argues for marriage as the marker of complex individual and group identities. In doing so, it utilises new theories of identity construction that draw on code-switching, a phenomenon identified by the discipline of linguistics. This more nuanced approach to the family provides a better understanding of the religious, social and political implications surrounding individual marriages during the early empire. Herod I’s own marriages demonstrate his desire to construct a religious and social identity to legitimise his position as usurper. Equally, Herod I uses marriage as a tool both to draw together disparate ethnic groups in his kingdom and to make alliances with client kings. Marriage is also used to heal divisions amongst his diverse family.
    [Show full text]
  • Damascus: from the Fall of Persia to the Roman Conquest
    Dead Sea Discoveries 25 (2018) 299–318 brill.com/dsd Damascus: From the Fall of Persia to the Roman Conquest Paul J. Kosmin Harvard University [email protected] Abstract This contribution aims to provide an outline of the political dynamics, cultural devel- opments, and, ultimately, historical semantics of the city of Damascus for the circle(s) of its eponymous Document. Keywords Damascus – Seleucid empire – Ptolemaic empire – Damascus Document – urbanism 1 Introduction Damascus appears seven times in the Document that bears its name. “The land -is named as the dwelling of the “returners” or “con (ארץ דמשק) ”of Damascus from the land of Judah (CD 6:5). Four ( שבי ישראל) verts” or “penitents” of Israel times, “the land of Damascus” is the site where a new covenant was established or entered into (CD 6:19, 8:21, 19:33‒34, and 20:12). Finally, Damascus appears with reference to two biblical passages: in allusion to Amos 5:26‒27a—“I will exile the tents of your king and the foundation of your images beyond the tents ;(as the destination of displacement (CD 7:15—”(מאהלי דמשק) of Damascus and in an interpretation of Numbers 24:17—“A star has left Jacob, a staff has risen from Israel”—the star is identified as “the Interpreter of the Law who will CD 7:18‒20). The latter use is also) ”(דורש התורה הבא דמשק) come to Damascus attested in the Qumran manuscript 4Q266 3 iii 20. Damascus is the only loca- tion outside Israel or Judah to be mentioned in this Document; no other such references to the city are found in the extant Dead Sea Scrolls.
    [Show full text]