DOCSLIB.ORG

XUNWU CHEN/ Global Justice and Duty to Humanity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
XUNWU CHEN/ Global Justice and Duty to Humanity GLOBAL JUSTICE AND DUTY TO HUMANITY —A PHENOMENOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE Xunwu Chen Abstract: This essay is devoted to exploring global justice as duty to humanity. The essay first explores humanity as the universal substance of all humankind, indicating that if a person loses a quality, s/he is not alienated or less than himself/herself; but if a person loses his/her humanity, s/he is alienated and absurd. Second, the essay demonstrates that the idea of humanity as the universal substance of all humankind is necessary to make senses those operating norms and principles of global justice in our time, including human rights, crimes against humanity and toleration. Third, essay indicates that global justice is the way of human living because it is consistent with humanity as the universal substance of all humankind. Therefore, the essay concludes that global justice is giving due to humanity as a substance. We can hardly talk about global justice today without mentioning the concepts of the law of humanity, human rights, crimes against humanity, and global cultural toleration. What are conspicuous also follow. First, we search for global justice of, for, and by all humankind in the globe, not justice for all beings—humans and non-humans included. We aim at global principles of justice that normalize all humankind on the earth, not principles of justice that regulate all beings, humans and non-humans alike. Second, if there should be global justice of, for, and by all humankind on the earth, all humankind must share some commonalities. Third, the global human community formally declares the norms of human rights, crimes against humanity, and cultural toleration as the norms of global justice recognized in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 and the Rome Statute of International Criminal Courts in 2002. Therefore, the following normative question arises: What necessary condition(s) must be met if the norm of human rights, the laws of crimes against humanity, and the norm of global cultural toleration are applicable to all human persons, institutions, and practices Dr. XUNWU CHEN, Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy & Classics, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249. E-mail: [email protected]. Journal of East-West Thought 22 XUNWU CHEN in the world? Therefore, in this essay, it is argued that in order for us to make better sense of the concept of global justice, we must have a concept of humanity that can account for: (1) humankind in whole is an entity that can be an object of criminal injury; (2) humankind in whole is a sovereign entity that has legitimate legal authority to which those who commit crimes against humanity or offence to the law of humanity and human rights must be answerable for their activities and responsibilities; and (3) humankind in whole is a sovereign entity of legitimate legal authority in whose name juridical laws (such the Roman Statute of International Criminal Court are established and issued, just as America is a political community of legal sovereign in whose names such constructs such as “the American Constitution” and “American Laws”) come into existence. In short, we must have a concept of humanity as an entity with legitimate authority, power, and rights to make claims. What kind of entity can, and should, humanity be in this context? A quality, virtue, or a substance? Without further introduction, I present my case below. I. Let us start with the concept of humanity as the universal substance or the Aristotelian secondary substance of all humankind. The concept implies three ideas: (1) all human beings belong to the same species or family of beings called “humankind” named by humanity; 2) humanity is not merely a quality, but an entity-subject that underlies all human activities and is embodied in all human persons; and (3) the most justified way of living for humankind, consistent with humanity as a substance, is universal and necessary to all humankind. The term “humanity” can name a species or family of beings, not merely a quality. In English, the term “humanity” is often synonymous to such terms as “the human race” or “mankind” (Mazlish 2009, 1). A substance is a subject or entity that possesses qualities or that is predicated by qualities. A quality is a property possessed by an entity. To claim that a being is a substance is not the same as claiming a being is a material entity or a being has a physical body. In reality, we can indulge ourselves in the view that there can be non-material or non-bodily substance, e.g., mental substance. Thus, for example, one can reasonably claim that God is a substance without meaning that God has a physical body or is a physical being. It is not unreasonable for us, and it does make sense for us, to claim that God is a spiritual substance, or to claim that the mind is a Journal of East-West Though GLOBAL JUSTICE AND DUTY TO HUMANITY 23 mental substance. Similarly, to claim that humanity is the universal substance of all human beings is not to claim that humanity is a physical or bodily entity, which occupies a physical space in human beings. Similarly, to claim that a tomato is a substance is not to claim that tomato is a physical entity that occupies a physical space or has a physical body. As Aristotle points out, a substance underlies, and is the subject of, properties, conditions, and activities. That is to say, a substance is not merely a property, but a substantive subject of which properties, conditions, and activities are predicates. As Aristotle sees it, substances divide between primary and secondary ones. A primary substance is an individual entity that “is neither predicable of a subject nor present in a subject.”(Aristotle 1941, 9) A primary substance is not a predicate to another subject, but can only be a subject, which is predicated by qualities, quantities, conditions, and activities. In comparison, a secondary substance refers to species and genus to which primary substances belong and which signifies an entity qualitatively differentiated (Ibid, 12). For the purpose of this study, we should focus on the concept of the secondary substance here. While a secondary substance is asserted of or embodied in a family of primary substances, it does not “merely indicate quality, like the term ‘white’.”(Ibid.) Instead, a secondary substance is also an entity that underlies and is the subject of properties, conditions and activities. Thus, apple is not merely a quality or property of particular Fuji apples, and differs from sweetness as a quality or property of them. Instead, apple indicates a substance qualitatively differentiated from tomato or potato. The humanity of Barbara Stanwyck and Cary Grant differs from goodness, beauty (handsomeness), specific height, and weight that are qualities of these two persons. Their humanity is an entity of which reason, equality, human dignity and free will are properties. Their humanity is a substance designating a family of beings wherein human status and human rights exist. For conceptual clarity, three points warrant repetition. First, an Aristotelian secondary substance is substantially constitutive of a primary substance. That is to say, it is part of the substance of a primary substance in whole. An Aristotelian secondary substance necessarily presents in the substances of primary substances themselves, not their properties or virtues. Proper primary substances necessarily embody the secondary substance as part of its substance or otherwise it is an alienated substance. No wonder, when a person loses his/her humanity substance, s/he is an alienated person and thus becomes absurd. In comparison, if a person loses a quality, s/he is not alienated or less than they are self, but simply lacks the Journal of East-West Thought 24 XUNWU CHEN lost quality. Second, an Aristotelian secondary substance is a substantive subject or entity that has predicates, though it is embodied in a family of primary substances. In particular, humanity is a substantive subject or entity of which human rights, human status, human dignity, and reason are predicates. It is a subject or entity, which can be both a possible object of legal criminal injury and a sovereign being with the legitimate legal authority to define what a legal offence is. Third, the way of an Aristotelian secondary substance’s existence is universal and necessary to all members of the family named by this secondary substance. Moreover, we can understand that humanity is the universal substance of all humankind further as follows. First, humanity has as its functions a set of human feelings such as love, hate, compassion, shame, and repugnance. Meanwhile, humanity itself is not the functions of love, hate, compassion, shame, or repugnance. This differs from that when love functions as love, it is itself; when hate functions as hate, it is itself; when shame functions as shame, it is itself; or when repugnance functions as repugnance, it is itself. Second, it singles out a set of universal values such as dignity, autonomy, liberty, and personal integrity as its properties and predicates. That is to say, these properties or attributes become valuables for humanity, by humanity, and of humanity. Third, it singles out a set of properties or qualities as virtues, e.g., courage, wisdom, propriety, consistence, and the like. Again, these virtues can be predicates of humanity, but humanity is not identical to any of them. Though Kant never uses the concept of humanity as a substance, we can read Kant as asserting the following: (1) all humankind share a common mind which is rational by nature; this universal mind is of definite faculty; and (2) all human beings share a common humanity that has an intrinsic valued called “dignity”, and that is not, and must not be, merely means to other beings, but also an end in itself.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thomas Aquinas: Soul-Body Connection and the Afterlife Hyde Dawn Krista University of Missouri-St
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Theses Graduate Works 4-16-2012 Thomas Aquinas: Soul-Body Connection and the Afterlife Hyde Dawn Krista University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Krista, Hyde Dawn, "Thomas Aquinas: Soul-Body Connection and the Afterlife" (2012). Theses. 261. http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis/261 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thomas Aquinas: Soul-Body Connection and the Afterlife Krista Hyde M.L.A., Washington University in St. Louis, 2010 B.A., Philosophy, Southeast Missouri State University – Cape Girardeau, 2003 A Thesis Submitted to The Graduate School at the University of Missouri – St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Philosophy April 2012 Advisory Committee Gualtiero Piccinini, Ph.D. Chair Jon McGinnis, Ph.D. John Brunero, Ph.D. Copyright, Krista Hyde, 2012 Abstract Thomas Aquinas nearly succeeds in addressing the persistent problem of the mind-body relationship by redefining the human being as a body-soul (matter-form) composite. This redefinition makes the interaction problem of substance dualism inapplicable, because there is no soul “in” a body. However, he works around the mind- body problem only by sacrificing an immaterial afterlife, as well as the identity and separability of the soul after death. Additionally, Thomistic psychology has difficulty accounting for the transmission of universals, nor does it seem able to overcome the arguments for causal closure.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2014 Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy Bradley Taylor University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Bradley, "Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy" (2014). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1468. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1468 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1468 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy Abstract ABSTRACT HUMAN BEINGS AND THE MORAL LAW: MORAL PRECARIOUSNESS IN KANT'S ETHICAL PHILOSOPHY Bradley M. Taylor Dr. Paul Guyer This dissertation is an examination of human moral precariousness in Kant's ethics. Human beings are in a state of moral precariousness insofar as they are ever-capable of transgressing the moral law and are often uncertain of the moral worth of their actions. Put another way, in this dissertation I argue that the basic relationship between human beings and the moral law, in Kant's moral philosophy, is, most fundamentally, one of tenuousness and vacillation. This relation is the fundamental characteristic of the human moral condition because such a relation is built into Kant's account of human moral agency. We have a tenuous relation to the moral law because we always have at least the possibility of conflict between our desire for happiness (i.e. the satisfaction of our inclinations) and the requirements of the moral law.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotelian Phronãªsis, the Discourse of Human Rights, And
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Political Science Faculty Research and Scholarship Political Science 2013 Aristotelian Phronêsis, the Discourse of Human Rights, and Contemporary Global Practice Stephen Salkever Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/polisci_pubs Part of the Political Science Commons Citation Salkever, Stephen, "Aristotelian Phronêsis, the Discourse of Human Rights, and Contemporary Global Practice" (2013). Political Science Faculty Research and Scholarship. Paper 25. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/polisci_pubs/25 This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/polisci_pubs/25 For more information, please contact [email protected]. DRAFT—NOT FOR QUOTATION OR CITATION. Aristotelian Phronêsis , the Discourse of Human Rights, and Contemporary Global Practice Stephen Salkever Bryn Mawr College August, 2013 (A version of this paper was presented at a conference on Practical Wisdom and Globalizing Practice held in November 2012 at Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. For questions and comments I thank my fellow conferees and especially the conference organizer, Prof. Xu Changfu of the SYSU Philosophy Department.) In this paper, I will outline some fundamental differences between the evaluative and explanatory language of Aristotelian practical reason based on his empirical psychological
    [Show full text]
  • Deriving Morality from Politics: Rethinking the Formula of Humanity Author(S): Japa Pallikkathayil Source: Ethics, Vol
    Deriving Morality from Politics: Rethinking the Formula of Humanity Author(s): Japa Pallikkathayil Source: Ethics, Vol. 121, No. 1 (October 2010), pp. 116-147 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656041 . Accessed: 13/01/2011 10:19 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ethics. http://www.jstor.org Deriving Morality from Politics: Rethinking the Formula of Humanity* Japa Pallikkathayil Kant’s Formula of Humanity famously forbids treating others merely as a means.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventing 'Humanity': Early- Modern Perspectives
    [Intellectual History Archive 5, 2018] Kontler, Inventing ‘humanity’ INVENTING ‘HUMANITY’: EARLY- MODERN PERSPECTIVES László Kontler1 Central European University I. Introduction This essay addresses a crucial chapter in the development of the modern concept of humanity (mankind , humanité, Menschheit) in European culture. 2 It is not an empirical study based on primary research, rather an attempt to sketch an analytical framework for approaching and understanding a broad array of specific historical topics and phenomena within the parameters of an encompassing theme. The methodological assumption at its heart is trivial: our concept of ‘humanity’ is not an intrinsic one, but a contextually defined cultural product shaped by processes of philosophical, historical, social-anthropological and political self-reflection, and of encounter with ‘others’ in modern times, which all raised important and disturbing questions about the differentiae specifica of the human kind. In tackling some of these questions and significant answers to them during the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries, I focus on early-modern versions of three important intellectual frameworks that determined the consideration of the diversity versus unity, and diversity within unity, of mankind. These are, first, the temporalization of human difference: the notion that such difference is largely a matter of patterns in the development of human faculties and relations both among men and between them and their environment across (virtual) time. Second, the historicization of nature: the study of nature on the basis of the collection and ordering of data about phenomena as they actually exist in space as well as in time. Third, the naturalization of man: the study of humans without the ascription of a special status to them, with the approach of the naturalists, as coequal from the methodological point of view with any other product of the Creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Humanity As a Justification for Human Rights Claims Simon Hope
    Common humanity as a justification for human rights claims Simon Hope I Anyone familiar with the modern language of human rights will have heard the phrase human rights are held in virtue of our common humanity. In this chapter, I want to examine this phrase further; or rather, one sense thereof, for the claim under consideration is ambiguous – in virtue of the “in virtue of” clause – and this ambiguity must be cleared up. The claim might be deployed in a descriptive sense: human rights track certain features of our common humanity, but are justified on entirely different grounds (by, say, appeal to what would be chosen under certain con- straints in an idealized thought experiment.)1 However, the claim that human rights are held in virtue of our common humanity has appealed to many defenders of human rights as a justificatory claim: we can iden- tify features of our common humanity that count as reasons for some conception of human rights. It is the justificatory claim that I consider here. More precisely, my target is the following thought, basic to many philosophical conceptions of human rights: that, by appealing to the moral significance of features of human nature that all of us – of course – share, human rights can be justified by a conception of the human good that is accessible to all. My complaint will be that these bold invo- cations of common humanity idealize away the depth and breadth of moral diversity, and so cannot give a satisfactory account of the intelli- gibility of moral reasons in the face of this diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Modern Asia Can We Speak of an ‘Early Modern’ World?
    > Comparative Intellectual Histories of Early Modern Asia Can we speak of an ‘early modern’ world? To speak of an ‘early modern’ world raises three awkward problems: the problem of early modernity, the problem of comparison and the problem of globalisation. In what follows, a discussion of these problems will be combined with a case study of the rise of humanism. Peter Burke (rationality, individualism, capitalism, distance’, it is probably best to describe ered at the end of the 15th century). Fol- The ethical wing has been discussed by and so on). the early modern period as at best a lowing the shock of the French invasion Theodore de Bary and others who note The Concept A major problem is the western ori- time of ‘proto-globalisation’, despite the of Italy in 1494, some leading human- the concern of Confucius (Kongzi) and The concept ‘early modern’ was origi- gin of the conceptual apparatus with increasing importance of connections ists, notably Machiavelli, shifted from a his followers and of ‘neo-confucians’ nally coined in the 1940s to refer to a which we are working. As attempts to between the continents, of economic, concern with ethics to a concern with like Zhu Xi with the ideal man, ‘princely period in European history from about study ‘feudalism’ on a world scale have political and intellectual encounters, politics. man’ or ‘noble person’ (chunzi) and also 1500 to 1750 or 1789. It became widely shown, it is very difficult to avoid circu- not only between the ‘West’ and the On the other side, we find the philolo- with the cultivation of the self (xiushen).
    [Show full text]
  • Bhagat Puran Singh a SERVA N T of the PEOPLE
    Bhagat Puran Singh A SERVA N T OF THE PEOPLE As Assessment by — S. Bhagat Singh (Retd. Judge) — Diwan Anand Kumar M. A. —S. Narain Singh M. A. —V. N. Narayanan — P. P. S. Gill —S Khushwant Singh —Bibi Amrit Kaur —I. J. Singh —Usha Pratap Singh Whatever you have received more than others in health, in talents, in ability, in success, in a pleasant childhood, in harmonious conditions of home life, all this you must not take as a matter of course. In gratitude for your fortune, you must render in return some sacrifice of your own life for other lives. —Albert Schweitzer. Publisher Dr. INDERJIT KAUR President ALL INDIA PINGALWARA SOCIET¥(Regd.) ASR. ■ ? a ™ 1 ^■^niMiailih.nra FOREWORD This booklet contains a number of articles, relating to Bhagat Puran Singh Ji which were written during his life time by eminent intellectuals and writers like Diwan Anand Kumar, Ex-Vice Chancellor, Punjab University; Sh. V. N. Narayanan, Editor-in-chief, Daily Tribune; S. Khushwant Singh and several others. The service and dedication of Bhagat Puran Singh to the suffering humanity influenced these authors so deeply that their pens were impelled to laud the , Bhagatji for his great mission he embarked upon. This great Samaritan is no more amongst us today, yet Pingalwara Ashram—a godly aegis for hundreds of destitutes and incurably sick people - is carrying on the ideals of Bhagatji under the super­ vision of his successor and present President, Dr. Inderjit Kaur with the same fervour and enthu­ siasm as was seen formerly. She is assisted and co­ operated in this great task by her colleagues who are equally devoted to this momentous cause.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spiritual W Ay of Life
    A Spiritual W ay of Life Bibi Dr. Inderjit Kaur Publisher : Dr. Inderjit Kaur, President All India Pingalwara, Charitable Society (Regd.) Amritsar (1) A Spiritual W ay of Life by Bibi Dr. Inderjit Kaur August : 2010 Publisher : Dr. Inderjit Kaur, President All India Pingalwara, Charitable Society (Regd.) Amritsar Printer Printwell 146, Industrial, Focal Point, Amritsar (2) Preface When a selfless person like Dr. Inderjeet Kaur puts down her thoughts on significant humanitarian topics, one sits up to take notice. Having worked with leprosy patients for 30 years only with Gurbani Guidance and God's grace, I can easily feel how as a successor of Bhagat Puran Singh, she feels the interminable wish to remain engrossed in the service of the down-trodden. Also her Gurbani-oriented exposition on death is heartening. Let me first dilate on the capacity of a selfless worker in terms of the message of Guru Granth Sahib. The worker is not, in my view, only a social worker but is a servant of Guru Nanak having no hiatus between what he says and what he does. Then, as I said in a London magazine some years ago, a Sikh is an Ambassador of love to humanity. Add to this the insatiable hunger for self-annihilation. Entrenched in the service and rememberance of the Lord and His creation, he always symbolizes the qualities of the Lord himself. My impression is that Dr. Inderjeet Kaur has beautifully encompassed the attributes of a selfless Servant of Humanity in her life and thoughts imbibed from the work and teachings of 'Bhagat Puran Singh'.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Nature According to Saint Thomas Aquinas
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1942 Human Nature According to Saint Thomas Aquinas Virginia Moore Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Moore, Virginia, "Human Nature According to Saint Thomas Aquinas" (1942). Master's Theses. 665. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/665 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1942 Virginia Moore HUMAN NATURE ACCORDIID TO SAINT THOMAS AQUINAS BY v:riG INIA MOORE A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFIT.I:MFm OF THE REQ.UIRJiJmN!'S FOR THE DIDREE OF MASI'ER OF .ARTS IN LOYOLA UNIVERSITY AIDUST 1942 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page INTRODUCTION . iii I. r!ATERI.AL BEIIDS • 1 II. SPIRITUAL SUBSTANCES 25 III. THE NATURE OF MAN • . 42 IV. CONCLUSION . 81 v. REFERENCES . 84 VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY . 85 INTRODUCTION In the teachings of St. Thomas, philosophy is not a salve to theology. He demonstrates by the principles of reason, many propositions forming a doctrine separate from theology, strictly speaking. He teaches a philosophy distinct from theology; the former, solving problems by the natural resources of the human mind; the latter, seeking its proofs in divine revelation. Both can happen to meet on the ground of the same truths, but each conserves its physiognomy, its means of research, and of argumentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability of Moral Traits (Justice and Humanity) in Emerging Adults: a Longitudinal Analysis
    Stability of Moral Traits (Justice and Humanity) in Samantha Jacobson, Julia DeVere, Maddie Grigg, Mikayla Emerging Adults: A Longitudinal Analysis Logue, Lazarus Scarbrough, Mícheál D. Roe Presented at the Annual SPFC Research Conference 2019 Seattle Pacific University Introduction Materials • Emerging adulthood is a developmental time period characterized Demographic questionnaire Justice at Time 1 was not a significant predictor of Humanity at Time 2. In by identity formation, focus on the self, and wide-ranging opportunities VIA Survey of Character Strengths (Peterson & Seligman, 2004) contrast, Humanity at Time 1 was a significant predictor of Justice at Time 2; for exploration (Arnett, 2007). It is considered a particularly important • Six Virtues: Wisdom, Courage, Humanity, Justice, Temperance, and however, this relationship was in the negative direction (See Table 3) period for seeking life roles that provide a sense of purpose or Transcendence meaningfulness. It is also considered a critical formative period for moral • 24 Strengths (e.g., Spirituality, Humor, Love of Learning) maturity in adulthood, and for personality changes that relate closely to Table 3 character development (Noftle, 2015). Calling and Vocation Questionnaire (CVQ; DiK, Eldridge, Steger, & Duffy, 2012) Time 1 Predictors of Justice at Time 2 • Character traits are stable and universal personality characteristics that • Scales: Presence, Search influence thinking, feeling, willing, and action (Niemiec, 2013). Virtues • Subscales: Transcendent Summons, Purposeful Work, Prosocial Orientation Variable β t p value with their associated strengths (e.g., wisdom with creativity and Justice Time 1 .99 5.31 .000 curiosity) are considered positive character traits (Peterson & Seligman, Procedures 2004). Informed consent materials were explained and signatures collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Humans and Nature: Finding Meaning Through Metaphysics Justin Stone [email protected]
    Rollins College Rollins Scholarship Online Master of Liberal Studies Theses 2013 Humans and Nature: Finding Meaning through Metaphysics Justin Stone [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.rollins.edu/mls Part of the Metaphysics Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Stone, Justin, "Humans and Nature: Finding Meaning through Metaphysics" (2013). Master of Liberal Studies Theses. 42. http://scholarship.rollins.edu/mls/42 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Rollins Scholarship Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Liberal Studies Theses by an authorized administrator of Rollins Scholarship Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Humans and Nature: Finding Meaning Through Metaphysics A Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Liberal Studies by Justin S. Stone May, 2013 Mentor: Dr. Hoyt Edge Reader: Dr. Robert Vander Poppen Rollins College Hamilton Holt School Master of Liberal Studies Program Winter Park, Florida Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1 – Ancient Thought: Plato and Aristotle 7 Chapter 2 – Medieval Philosophy: From Augustine to Aquinas 22 Chapter 3 – The Scientific Revolution: Descartes and Bacon 34 Redefine Nature Chapter 4 – Spinoza: God in the Machine 48 Chapter 5 – Heidegger: Return of Metaphysics 56 Conclusion 67 Index of References 72 1 Introduction Such, in outline, but even more purposeless, more void of meaning, is the world which Science presents for our belief. Amid such a world, if anywhere, our ideals henceforward must find a home. That man is the product of causes which had no provision of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental collisions of atoms… - Russell Bertrand Before the 19th Century, individuals who studied the natural world were called natural philosophers.
    [Show full text]