DOCSLIB.ORG

An Incremental Strategy for Spacecraft Flight Software Reuse

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Incremental Strategy for Spacecraft Flight Software Reuse An Incremental Strategy for Spacecraft Flight Software Reuse Gary M. Heiligman, T. Adrian Hill, Robyn L. LeGrys, and Stephen P. Williams The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723-6099 mailto:[email protected] Abstract IDPU software is delivered with the instruments; C&DH and G&C software are provided with the spacecraft bus. This paper describes a process of spacecraft flight In 1997, JHU/APL completed the critical design review software development that reuses requirements, designs, (CDR) for the TIMED mission. Mission-level CDRs for and implementations. Beginning in 1997, The Johns three other flight projects followed in quick succession: Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory CONTOUR in 2000, MESSENGER in 2002, and STEREO (JHU/APL) developed the flight software for five different in 2003. The CDR for a fourth mission, New Horizons, space missions: (1) Thermosphere, Ionosphere, will also be held in 2003. Each of these missions requires Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED), (2) C&DH and G&C software; some require instrument COmet Nucleus TOUR (CONTOUR), (3) MErcury software as well. Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging As one of its unique capabilities, JHU/APL’s Space (MESSENGER), (4) Solar TErrestrial RElations Department provides experience and expertise in Observatory (STEREO), and (5) New Horizons, a mission developing and testing spacecraft flight software. A group to Pluto and beyond. JHU/APL met strict constraints of of less than 30 developers delivers the software for these budget and schedule by reusing products from each and future missions. Software reuse plays an important mission for the following one in a successively more role in the way the group creates these computer comprehensive fashion. Keys to the success of this reuse programs. are consistent external interface protocols, rigorous At JHU/APL, reuse consists of taking the requirements, requirements management, retention of the original designs, source code, and associated documentation from development documentation, use of a consistent past missions as the starting point for each new mission. development process, and a group organization that The developers of CONTOUR and later missions have fosters reuse. The reused packages include bootstrap, task succeeded in reusing incrementally greater portions of the scheduling, uplink, command handling, autonomy, and software from past missions in a process that we describe 1553 bus support. here. 2. Motivations for reuse 2.1. Reliability 1. Introduction Because failure of a critical computer program could The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics easily lead to the loss of the entire mission, reliability is Laboratory (JHU/APL) has been developing spacecraft paramount for spacecraft flight software. JHU/APL flight software ever since the first general-purpose therefore takes a conservative approach to the computers were flown on spacecraft [1]. This software is development of both hardware and software. For example, of three types. JHU/APL uses only space-qualified, radiation-hard (1) Command and data handling (C&DH) programs processors and memory in its spacecraft. The development process telecommands, transmit telemetry, and tools (compiler, locator, and operating system) must also provide onboard data storage. be highly reliable. “Flight heritage”—the proven (2) Guidance and control (G&C) programs determine the capability of an article to perform to specifications in the spacecraft’s attitude and trajectory and control them. harsh environment of space—is considered an asset in (3) Instrument programs control and take data from the both hardware and software. payload and usually run on a dedicated instrument In software, flight heritage is obvious when source data processing unit (IDPU). code is reused from previous missions. However, flight heritage is also valuable for designs and requirements, mission all affect the software in fundamental ways. The because correctness of these products is just as critical to different mission drivers, though, are often the most mission success as bug-free software. critical barriers to reuse, because they may dictate that a solution that worked for past missions is untenable for the 2.2. Volume new mission. They may affect the level of autonomy, the The C&DH and G&C programs for each mission timing constraints, or the basic assumptions under which require tens of thousands of lines of code. Starting in the software must function. 1997, JHU/APL has had to develop spacecraft flight 3.2. Focus on individual missions means limited software at a rate of approximately one new mission per year. Developing this much software anew for each effort for reuse per se mission would strain JHU/APL’s in-house capability even Flight software development at JHU/APL is funded if time were not a factor. almost entirely by the individual missions. Mission managers are understandably reluctant to devote precious 2.3. Time dollars allocated to their own mission to fund reusability Deep-space missions must be launched on a schedule improvements that primarily benefit future missions. And dictated by the dynamics of the Solar System. In order to missions not yet funded for implementation generally are be ready for launch, the software must be developed, unable to provide the resources to ensure that a flight integrated, and tested. Thus reuse often becomes essential software product is developed for reusability. Thus there is even if the developers would like to make changes (for no ready pool of money for reuse per se. The staff efficiency, maintainability, reusability, etc.), because there organization within JHU/APL takes on the responsibility is simply not enough time. of fostering reuse as a part of its primary goal of developing mission-specific software. 3. Barriers to Reuse 4. Framework for reuse 3.1. Differences in mission-level requirements dictate different solutions 4.1. Hardware architecture The most important barrier to reuse is the different The spacecraft before TIMED distributed the data requirements at the mission level that lead to different processing over hardware in several different ways and software architectures. The five missions discussed in this used a variety of processors and implementation paper are the following. languages. Since then, however, three features have (1) TIMED is the first mission in NASA’s Solar contributed to the stabilization of G&C and C&DH Terrestrial Probes program. It studies the Earth’s software. upper atmosphere with four remote-sensing 4.1.1. The integrated electronics module (IEM). On instruments. It has performed its scientific mission TIMED and all subsequent missions, a PCI backplane successfully since its launch on December 7, 2001. connects the command and data handling (C&DH) (2) CONTOUR was a Discovery-class mission to explore processor, solid-state recorder, and transponder interfaces the diversity of comets. It performed flawlessly for six in one physical box: the IEM. Consistency of uplink weeks of phasing orbits, but it was destroyed on protocols is in part a result of this decision. Most missions August 15, 2002, during the solid-rocket motor burn have two IEMs for full redundancy. that was to place it in heliocentric orbit. (3) MESSENGER is a Discovery-class mission to fly by 4.1.2. The UTMC SµMMIT chip. TIMED and all and orbit Mercury. It is manifested for launch on subsequent missions have used a consistent protocol and March 10, 2004. hardware set to communicate between the processor and (4) STEREO is the third mission in NASA’s Solar many system components: the MIL-STD-1553B Notice 2 Terrestrial Probes program. It consists of two bus and the SµMMIT integrated circuit family from identical spacecraft in different heliocentric orbits. UTMC. Consistency of this interface enables much of the Launch (from a single vehicle) will occur in external communication software to be reused. November 2005. 4.1.3. The power distribution unit interface. On (5) New Horizons is the first mission to Pluto-Charon and CONTOUR and all subsequent missions, electronics in the the Kuiper Belt of rocky, icy objects beyond. Launch power distribution unit provide the interface to the power is planned for January 2006. system electronics and some attitude control hardware We summarize the differences for these five missions (e.g., thrusters, sun-angle sensors, reaction wheels, and in the Appendix. The number and types of processors, solar-array drives). It translates 1553 bus messages into how they are interconnected, and the lifetime of the command signals to the hardware and translates data signals into 1553 bus messages. Consistency of this the developers reuse part or all of a product from an earlier interface also leads to software reuse. mission. Also, during the review of a partially reused design, the 4.2. Development methodology and language reviewers may find defects in a reused portion of the A shared methodology and language are essential for design. The corrective actions may apply to both the reuse. The flight software developers use a “waterfall” earlier and later missions; thus, corrective actions development methodology, as shown in Figure 1. themselves can be reused. Software Acceptance Requirements Requirements Test Plan Review Test Plan 4.4. Process documentation Definition Review (Each Build) Generation Each mission requires a software development Preliminary Preliminary Design Design management plan (SDMP) tailored to its unique needs. Review Large portions of this document are often reusable. Detailed Detailed Design Perhaps more importantly, consistency of the software Design Review modus operandi means that the developers need not learn Code a new way of doing business when they begin work on a Code Walkthroughs mission. It is particularly important that the graphical design notation not change, because these products are Unit Test both time-consuming to produce and nontrivial to review. Build 4.5. Development tools Integration Repeat for and Test Each Build For a mission to reuse the development products of a Acceptance Test preceding mission efficiently, paper copies are inadequate.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hayabusa2 and the Formation of the Solar System PPS02-25
    PPS02-25 JpGU-AGU Joint Meeting 2017 Hayabusa2 and the formation of the Solar System *Sei-ichiro WATANABE1,2, Hayabusa2 Science Team2 1. Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, 2. JAXA/ISAS Explorations of small solar system bodies bring us direct and unique information about the formation and evolution of the Solar system. Asteroids may preserve accretion processes of planetesimals or pebbles, a sequence of destructive events induced by the gas-driven migration of giant planets, and hydrothermal processes on the parent bodies. After successful small-body missions like Rosetta to comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, Dawn to Vesta and Ceres, and New Horizons to Pluto, two spacecraft Hayabusa2 and OSIRIS-REx are now traveling to dark primitive asteroids.The Hayabusa2 spacecraft journeys to a C-type near-earth asteroid (162173) Ryugu (1999 JU3) to conduct detailed remote sensing observations and return samples from the surface. The Haybusa2 spacecraft developed by Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) was successfully launched on 3 Dec. 2014 by the H-IIA Launch Vehicle and performed an Earth swing-by on 3 Dec. 2015 to set it on a course toward its target. The spacecraft will reach Ryugu in the summer of 2018, observe the asteroid for 18 months, and sample surface materials from up to three different locations. The samples will be delivered to the Earth in Nov.-Dec. 2020. Ground-based observations have obtained a variety of optical reflectance spectra for Ryugu. Some reported the 0.7 μm absorption feature and steep slope in the short wavelength region, suggesting hydrated minerals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Messenger
    10th anniversary of VLT First Light The Messenger The ground layer seeing on Paranal HAWK-I Science Verification The emission nebula around Antares No. 132 – June 2008 –June 132 No. The Organisation The Perfect Machine Tim de Zeeuw a ground­based spectroscopic comple­ thousand each semester, 800 of which (ESO Director General) ment to the Hubble Space Telescope. are for Paranal. The User Portal has Italy and Switzerland had joined ESO in about 4 000 registered users and 1981, enabling the construction of the the archive contains 74 TB of data and This issue of the Messenger marks the 3.5­m New Technology Telescope with advanced data products. tenth anniversary of first light of the Very pioneering advances in active optics, Large Telescope. It is an excellent occa­ crucial for the next step: the construction sion to look at the broader implications of the Very Large Telescope, which Winning strategy of the VLT’s success and to consider the received the green light from Council in next steps. 1987 and was built on Cerro Paranal in The VLT opened for business some five the Atacama desert between Antofagasta years after the Keck telescopes, but the and Taltal in Northern Chile. The 8.1­m decision to take the time to build a fully Mission Gemini telescopes and the 8.3­m Subaru integrated system, consisting of four telescope were constructed on a similar 8.2­m telescopes and providing a dozen ESO’s mission is to enable scientific dis­ time scale, while the Large Binocular Tele­ foci for a carefully thought­out comple­ coveries by constructing and operating scope and the Gran Telescopio Canarias ment of instruments together with four powerful observational facilities that are now starting operations.
    [Show full text]
  • New Voyage to Rendezvous with a Small Asteroid Rotating with a Short Period
    Hayabusa2 Extended Mission: New Voyage to Rendezvous with a Small Asteroid Rotating with a Short Period M. Hirabayashi1, Y. Mimasu2, N. Sakatani3, S. Watanabe4, Y. Tsuda2, T. Saiki2, S. Kikuchi2, T. Kouyama5, M. Yoshikawa2, S. Tanaka2, S. Nakazawa2, Y. Takei2, F. Terui2, H. Takeuchi2, A. Fujii2, T. Iwata2, K. Tsumura6, S. Matsuura7, Y. Shimaki2, S. Urakawa8, Y. Ishibashi9, S. Hasegawa2, M. Ishiguro10, D. Kuroda11, S. Okumura8, S. Sugita12, T. Okada2, S. Kameda3, S. Kamata13, A. Higuchi14, H. Senshu15, H. Noda16, K. Matsumoto16, R. Suetsugu17, T. Hirai15, K. Kitazato18, D. Farnocchia19, S.P. Naidu19, D.J. Tholen20, C.W. Hergenrother21, R.J. Whiteley22, N. A. Moskovitz23, P.A. Abell24, and the Hayabusa2 extended mission study group. 1Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA ([email protected]) 2Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Kanagawa, Japan 3Rikkyo University, Tokyo, Japan 4Nagoya University, Aichi, Japan 5National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan 6Tokyo City University, Tokyo, Japan 7Kwansei Gakuin University, Hyogo, Japan 8Japan Spaceguard Association, Okayama, Japan 9Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan 10Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea 11Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan 12University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan 13Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan 14University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan 15Chiba Institute of Technology, Chiba, Japan 16National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Iwate, Japan 17National Institute of Technology, Oshima College, Yamaguchi, Japan 18University of Aizu, Fukushima, Japan 19Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA 20University of Hawai’i, Manoa, HI, USA 21University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA 22Asgard Research, Denver, CO, USA 23Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ, USA 24NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA 1 Highlights 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Shock Connectivity and the Late Cycle 24 Solar Energetic Particle Events in July and September 2017
    Shock Connectivity and the Late Cycle 24 Solar Energetic Particle Events in July and September 2017 J.G. Luhmann1, M.L. Mays2, Yan Li1, C.O. Lee1, H. Bain3, D. Odstrcil4, R.A. Mewaldt5, C.M.S. Cohen5, D. Larson1, Gordon Petrie6 1Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley. 2CCMC, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. 3NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center. 4George Mason University. 5California Institute of Technology. 6NSO. Corresponding author: Janet Luhmann ([email protected]) Key Points: Observer shock connectivity explains the SEP observations during the July and September 2017 events. The July and September 2017 solar and SEP events had similar characteristics due to similar source region and eruptions. The July and September 2017 events seemed to arise in conjunction with the appearance of a pseudostreamer, a possible alternate ICME source. This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1029/2018SW001860 © 2018 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved. Abstract As solar activity steadily declined toward the cycle 24 minimum in the early months of 2017, the expectation for major Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) events diminished with the sunspot number. It was thus surprising (though not unprecedented) when a new, potentially significant active region rotated around the East limb in early July that by mid-month was producing a series of coronal eruptions, reaching a crescendo around July 23. This series, apparently associated with the birth of a growing pseudostreamer, produced the largest SEP event(s) seen since the solar maximum years.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Science Division Status Report
    Planetary Science Division Status Report Jim Green NASA, Planetary Science Division January 26, 2017 Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory CommiBee Outline • Planetary Science ObjecFves • Missions and Events Overview • Flight Programs: – Discovery – New FronFers – Mars Programs – Outer Planets • Planetary Defense AcFviFes • R&A Overview • Educaon and Outreach AcFviFes • PSD Budget Overview New Horizons exploresPlanetary Science Pluto and the Kuiper Belt Ascertain the content, origin, and evoluFon of the Solar System and the potenFal for life elsewhere! 01/08/2016 As the highest resolution images continue to beam back from New Horizons, the mission is onto exploring Kuiper Belt Objects with the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) camera from unique viewing angles not visible from Earth. New Horizons is also beginning maneuvers to be able to swing close by a Kuiper Belt Object in the next year. Giant IcebergsObjecve 1.5.1 (water blocks) floatingObjecve 1.5.2 in glaciers of Objecve 1.5.3 Objecve 1.5.4 Objecve 1.5.5 hydrogen, mDemonstrate ethane, and other frozenDemonstrate progress gasses on the Demonstrate Sublimation pitsDemonstrate from the surface ofDemonstrate progress Pluto, potentially surface of Pluto.progress in in exploring and progress in showing a geologicallyprogress in improving active surface.in idenFfying and advancing the observing the objects exploring and understanding of the characterizing objects The Newunderstanding of Horizons missionin the Solar System to and the finding locaons origin and evoluFon in the Solar System explorationhow the chemical of Pluto wereunderstand how they voted the where life could of life on Earth to that pose threats to and physical formed and evolve have existed or guide the search for Earth or offer People’sprocesses in the Choice for Breakthrough of thecould exist today life elsewhere resources for human Year forSolar System 2015 by Science Magazine as exploraon operate, interact well as theand evolve top story of 2015 by Discover Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Lindley Johnson (NASA HQ) – NASA HEOMD – – NASA STMD – Tibor Balint (NASA HQ) – SSERVI – Greg Schmidt (NASA ARC) 19
    September 4, 2014: Planetary Science Subcommittee Nancy Chabot, SBAG Chair 11th SBAG Meeting • July 29-31, 2014: Washington, DC • Highlights of SBAG meeting presentations from major projects • Discussion of findings • New steering committee members • Future meetings 1 NEOWISE Reac,va,on • Reac,vated in Dec 2013, NEOWISE is observing, discovering, and characterizing asteroids & comets using 3.4 and 4.6 µm channels • 7239 minor planets observed, including 157 near-Earth objects (NEOs). • 89 discoveries, including 26 NEOs and 3 comets. • NEO discoveries are large, dark • First data delivery from Reac9vaon: March 2015 to IRSA: • hp://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/Missions/wise.html • All data from prime WISE/NEOWISE mission are publicly available through IRSA and team Comet P/2014 L2 NEOWISE papers; derived physical proper9es heading to PDS Dawn prepares to encounter Ceres PI: Alan Stern (SwRI) New Horizons Status PM: JHU-APL • Spacecraft is healthy & On-Course for Pluto (Radio) § 1.3x more fuel available for KBO Extended (High-E Plasma) NH Payload Mission phase than originally expected • Payload is healthy and well-calibrated § Finishing final Annual Checkout (ACO-8) • First Pluto OpNav Campaign conducted (UV Spectral) § See image below • Enter final Hibernation on Aug 29th (Vis-Color + IR Spectral) • Pluto Encounter begins on 2015-Jan-15 (Low-E Plasma) • Pluto Closest Approach: 2015-Jul-14 (Pan Imager) Intensive searches with ground-based facilities over the past Pluto OpNav Campaign: 2 years have not yet yielded a KBO target for NH. A 194- Cleanly separate Pluto & orbit Hubble program was started in June; below Charon shows the first potentially targetable KBO found.
    [Show full text]
  • MARS SCIENCE LABORATORY ORBIT DETERMINATION Gerhard L. Kruizinga(1)
    MARS SCIENCE LABORATORY ORBIT DETERMINATION Gerhard L. Kruizinga(1), Eric D. Gustafson(2), Paul F. Thompson(3), David C. Jefferson(4), Tomas J. Martin-Mur(5), Neil A. Mottinger(6), Frederic J. Pelletier(7), and Mark S. Ryne(8) (1-8)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109, +1-818-354-7060, fGerhard.L.Kruizinga, edg, Paul.F.Thompson, David.C.Jefferson, tmur, Neil.A.Mottinger, Fred.Pelletier, [email protected] Abstract: This paper describes the orbit determination process, results and filter strategies used by the Mars Science Laboratory Navigation Team during cruise from Earth to Mars. The new atmospheric entry guidance system resulted in an orbit determination paradigm shift during final approach when compared to previous Mars lander missions. The evolving orbit determination filter strategies during cruise are presented. Furthermore, results of calibration activities of dynamical models are presented. The atmospheric entry interface trajectory knowledge was significantly better than the original requirements, which enabled the very precise landing in Gale Crater. Keywords: Mars Science Laboratory, Curiosity, Mars, Navigation, Orbit Determination 1. Introduction On August 6, 2012, the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) and the Curiosity rover successful performed a precision landing in Gale Crater on Mars. A crucial part of the success was orbit determination (OD) during the cruise from Earth to Mars. The OD process involves determining the spacecraft state, predicting the future trajectory and characterizing the uncertainty associated with the predicted trajectory. This paper describes the orbit determination process, results, and unique challenges during the final approach phase.
    [Show full text]
  • New Horizons Pluto/KBO Mission Impact Hazard
    New Horizons Pluto/KBO Mission Impact Hazard Hal Weaver NH Project Scientist The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Outline • Background on New Horizons mission • Description of Impact Hazard problem • Impact Hazard mitigation – Hubble Space Telescope plays a key role New Horizons: To Pluto and Beyond The Initial Reconnaissance of The Solar System’s “Third Zone” KBOs Pluto-Charon Jupiter System 2016-2020 July 2015 Feb-March 2007 Launch Jan 2006 PI: Alan Stern (SwRI) PM: JHU Applied Physics Lab New Horizons is NASA’s first New Frontiers Mission Frontier of Planetary Science Explore a whole new region of the Solar System we didn’t even know existed until the 1990s Pluto is no longer an outlier! Pluto System is prototype of KBOs New Horizons gives the first close-up view of these newly discovered worlds New Horizons Now (overhead view) NH Spacecraft & Instruments 2.1 meters Science Team: PI: Alan Stern Fran Bagenal Rick Binzel Bonnie Buratti Andy Cheng Dale Cruikshank Randy Gladstone Will Grundy Dave Hinson Mihaly Horanyi Don Jennings Ivan Linscott Jeff Moore Dave McComas Bill McKinnon Ralph McNutt Scott Murchie Cathy Olkin Carolyn Porco Harold Reitsema Dennis Reuter Dave Slater John Spencer Darrell Strobel Mike Summers Len Tyler Hal Weaver Leslie Young Pluto System Science Goals Specified by NASA or Added by New Horizons New Horizons Resolution on Pluto (Simulations of MVIC context imaging vs LORRI high-resolution "noodles”) 0.1 km/pix The Best We Can Do Now 0.6 km/pix HST/ACS-PC: 540 km/pix New Horizons Science Status •
    [Show full text]
  • The Van Allen Probes' Contribution to the Space Weather System
    L. J. Zanetti et al. The Van Allen Probes’ Contribution to the Space Weather System Lawrence J. Zanetti, Ramona L. Kessel, Barry H. Mauk, Aleksandr Y. Ukhorskiy, Nicola J. Fox, Robin J. Barnes, Michele Weiss, Thomas S. Sotirelis, and NourEddine Raouafi ABSTRACT The Van Allen Probes mission, formerly the Radiation Belt Storm Probes mission, was renamed soon after launch to honor the late James Van Allen, who discovered Earth’s radiation belts at the beginning of the space age. While most of the science data are telemetered to the ground using a store-and-then-dump schedule, some of the space weather data are broadcast continu- ously when the Probes are not sending down the science data (approximately 90% of the time). This space weather data set is captured by contributed ground stations around the world (pres- ently Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute and the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Czech Republic), automatically sent to the ground facility at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Phys- ics Laboratory, converted to scientific units, and published online in the form of digital data and plots—all within less than 15 minutes from the time that the data are accumulated onboard the Probes. The real-time Van Allen Probes space weather information is publicly accessible via the Van Allen Probes Gateway web interface. INTRODUCTION The overarching goal of the study of space weather ing radiation, were the impetus for implementing a space is to understand and address the issues caused by solar weather broadcast capability on NASA’s Van Allen disturbances and the effects of those issues on humans Probes’ twin pair of satellites, which were launched in and technological systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Aerojet Boosters Set to Lift New Horizons Spacecraft
    January 15, 2006 Five Aerojet Boosters Set to Lift New Horizons Spacecraft Aerojet Propulsion Will Support Both Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft for Mission to Pluto SACRAMENTO, Calif., Jan. 15 /PRNewswire/ -- Aerojet, a GenCorp Inc. (NYSE: GY) company, will provide five solid rocket boosters for the launch vehicle and a propulsion system for the spacecraft when a Lockheed Martin Atlas® V launches the Pluto New Horizons spacecraft January 17 from Cape Canaveral, AFB. The launch window opens at 1:24 p.m. EST on January 17 and extends through February 14. The New Horizons mission, dubbed by NASA as the "first mission to the last planet," will study Pluto and its moon, Charon, in detail during a five-month- long flyby encounter. Pluto is the solar system's most distant planet, averaging 3.6 billion miles from the sun. Aerojet's solid rocket boosters (SRBs), each 67-feet long and providing an average of 250,000 pounds of thrust, will provide the necessary added thrust for the New Horizons mission. The SRBs have flown in previous vehicle configurations using two and three boosters; this is the first flight utilizing the five boosters. Additionally, 12 Aerojet monopropellant (hydrazine) thrusters on the Atlas V Centaur upper stage will provide roll, pitch, and yaw control settling burns for the launch vehicle main engines. Aerojet also supplies 8 retro rockets for Atlas Centaur separation. Aerojet also provided the spacecraft propulsion system, comprised of a propellant tank, 16 thrusters and various other components, which will control pointing and navigation for the spacecraft on its journey and during encounters with Pluto- Charon and, as part of a possible extended mission, to more distant, smaller objects in the Kuiper Belt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Ballistics Analysis of the Deep Impact Ejecta Plume: Determining Comet Tempel 1’S Gravity, Mass, and Density
    Icarus 190 (2007) 357–390 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus A ballistics analysis of the Deep Impact ejecta plume: Determining Comet Tempel 1’s gravity, mass, and density James E. Richardson a,∗,H.JayMeloshb, Carey M. Lisse c, Brian Carcich d a Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA b Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA c Planetary Exploration Group, Space Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, USA d Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Received 31 March 2006; revised 8 August 2007 Available online 15 August 2007 Abstract − In July of 2005, the Deep Impact mission collided a 366 kg impactor with the nucleus of Comet 9P/Tempel 1, at a closing speed of 10.2 km s 1. In this work, we develop a first-order, three-dimensional, forward model of the ejecta plume behavior resulting from this cratering event, and then adjust the model parameters to match the flyby-spacecraft observations of the actual ejecta plume, image by image. This modeling exercise indicates Deep Impact to have been a reasonably “well-behaved” oblique impact, in which the impactor–spacecraft apparently struck a small, westward-facing slope of roughly 1/3–1/2 the size of the final crater produced (determined from initial ejecta plume geometry), and possessing an effective strength of not more than Y¯ = 1–10 kPa. The resulting ejecta plume followed well-established scaling relationships for cratering in a medium-to-high porosity target, consistent with a transient crater of not more than 85–140 m diameter, formed in not more than 250–550 s, for the case of Y¯ = 0 Pa (gravity-dominated cratering); and not less than 22–26 m diameter, formed in not less than 1–3 s, for the case of Y¯ = 10 kPa (strength-dominated cratering).
    [Show full text]
  • Stardust Sample Return
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Stardust Sample Return Press Kit January 2006 www.nasa.gov Contacts Merrilee Fellows Policy/Program Management (818) 393-0754 NASA Headquarters, Washington DC Agle Stardust Mission (818) 393-9011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. Vince Stricherz Science Investigation (206) 543-2580 University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. Contents General Release ............................................................................................................... 3 Media Services Information ……………………….................…………….................……. 5 Quick Facts …………………………………………..................………....…........…....….. 6 Mission Overview …………………………………….................……….....……............…… 7 Recovery Timeline ................................................................................................ 18 Spacecraft ………………………………………………..................…..……...........……… 20 Science Objectives …………………………………..................……………...…..........….. 28 Why Stardust?..................…………………………..................………….....………............... 31 Other Comet Missions .......................................................................................... 33 NASA's Discovery Program .................................................................................. 36 Program/Project Management …………………………........................…..…..………...... 40 1 2 GENERAL RELEASE: NASA PREPARES FOR RETURN OF INTERSTELLAR CARGO NASA’s Stardust mission is nearing Earth after a 2.88 billion mile round-trip journey
    [Show full text]