C :i: Pr cotmc xii CITY AND COUNTY OF HON OLULU 530 SOUTH KING STREET, ROOM 202 , 96813-3065 TELEPHONE: (808) 768-5010 • FAX: (808) 768-5011

HEIDI TSUNEYOSHI CITY COUNCILMEMBER HONOLULU CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT II TELEPHONE: (808)768-5002 FAX: (808) 768-1222 EMAIL: htsuneyoshi(EhonoIuIuQy

October 29, 2020

TO: PEARLENE OTTO CLERK, COMMITTEEON ZONING, PLANNING& HOUSING

FROM: COUNCILMEMBERHEIDITSUNEYOSHI JF*4%’7

RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENTSTO THE KOOLAU LOASUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIESPLAN,ATTACHEDAS EXHIBITA TO BILL79 (2020)

Attached for consideration by the Zoning, Planning & Housing Committee are my proposed amendments to the Ko’olau Loa Sustainable Communities Plan attached to Bill79 (2020)

Thank you.

COUNCIL COM. 310 H

2 D W 2 a aD < 3

C C CD 0)

%uPofr0

C C C V -D C 0U)

[V WIII S aS 0 a, a 0 5 C It

-t It S

a cumin Ir oIC 0

0 0 — x

a a (0_ a0

— a S I) 0 ?LTh 0) C C) 0 3 a3 0 0 0 a -C C -C C

‘“1 0I C a0

-C

°1auP0k0 ‘I 0 0 I,

0-o 0 0(0 •0

I, 4

C C C fl C C ‘3 = 0) 0 JJ 0 a 0 SI & 0a C 0J 0 ‘C C)0 C) C 3 3 a3 3 ‘p 0 0 03 aC) z C) C C a C a C a

r m I 0> C a= z !1!1E10 0) ‘3 C 0 ‘C C = C 0) r

01 p

F I! 0) C) C 0 0’ C) 0 C -u 3 C C tC 3 03 0 C 0 03 C C C = C Si a -C a 0 03 33 C C) -C ‘C a0 C I03 -C a 03 zC -C r C C

I

I AMENDMENT FORM DEVELOPMENT PLAN (DP) AND NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) PLAN

TOTALPAGES: DATE: 29-Oct-20 COUNCILMEMBER: Heidi Tsuneyoshi STAFF & PHONE EXT: Michael Sakata/x85037

or MEASURE AMENDING SECTION OR AMENDMENT TEXT CLARIFICATION I PLAN TITLE PG NO DESCRIPTION! NO. (RES0IBILLIPLAN) EXHIBIT TITLE (RAMSEYER NEW LANGUAGE) COMMENTS FIGURE NO. DETAILS

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan Cover Replace cover photo Modernize cover photo and change cover color to match other rural SCP Consistency. DPP (2020) Sustainable covers (see attached replacement cover), recommendation, see D-682 Communities (2018). Plan Bill79 Ko’olau Lea Plan Inside Cover Replace inside cover Modernize inside cover photo to match other rural SCP covers (see Consistency. DPP (2020) Sustainable photo attached replacement inside cover), recommendation, see D-682 Communities (2018). Plan

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 3.1.2.2 Shoreline Areas 3-5 Add a new paragraph In October 2015. the State obtained a conservation easement and Updates the Plan to incorporate (2020) Sustainable after 2nd paragraph to restriction on development rights for lands at the Turtle Bay Resort pursuant the Turtle Bay Resort Communities recognize the to Act 121 (Session Laws of Hawaii 2015). The conservation easement and conservation easement of 2015. Plan acquisition of development restrictions protect, in perpetuity, lands for open space, DPP recommendation, see D shoreline resources at additional public park areas, and shoreline access from Kawela Bay to 682 (2018). Turtle Bay via a Kahuku Point. conservation easement

Bill 79 Koolau Loa Plan 3.3 Parks and Recreation 3-23 Add new paragraph In addition to the parks inventory described above, a 2015 Turtle Bay Resort Updates the Plan to incorporate (2020) Sustainable prior to Section 3.3.1 conservation easement agreement provides approximately 50 acres of land the Turtle Bay Resort Communities Policies: for additional City parks at Kawela Bay and at Kahuku Point, and conservation easement of 2015. Plan approximately 53 acres at Kawela Bay for State conservation land. DPP recommendation, see D 682 (2018).

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 3.5.2.3 Low Density 3-37 Revise first bullet Limit building heights to [throo ctorioc or ‘10foot, including roof form, with Revises height limitfor (2020) Sustainable Apartment heightc abovo 10 foot allowed only when warrantod duo] four stories with a consistency with Table 3-8. Communities maximum height of 60 feet, including roof form, but may vary according to DPP recommendation, see D Plan the required flood elevation, steep slope of the site, or the desire to protect 682 (2018). important natural features. Gabled or similar roof forms should be used to reflect a primarily rural residential design character. Bill79 Ke’elau Lea Plan 3.8.1 Turtle Bay Resort 3-51 to 3-52 Revise section Located at the north end of Ko’olau Loa, the existing complex of the Turtle Updates the Plan to incorporate (2020) Sustainable and Ceastline Bay Resort — withjits 500 room hotel, ocoan villas, townhouses and golf the Turtle Bay Resort Communities courcesj an existing 452-room hotel, a 57-unit condominium project known conservation easement of 2015. Plan as the Ocean Villas, 368 townhouse condominiums known as Kuilima DPP recommendation, see D Estates East” and “Kuilima Estates West,” and two golf courses — will 682 (2018). continue to be a major visitor accommodation in the area.

A State land use reclassification (Land Use Commission Docket A85-595), zone change (Ordinance 86-99). and [a] special management area use permit and shoreline setback variance (Resolution 86-308) [approved by the City in 1986 (Honolulu City Council Resolution 86 308, October 1, 1986)] allow the construction of up to five new hotels with 3,500 new [hotel and condominium] resort units at the nearly 900-acre Turtle Bay Resort property, providing expansion potential for the resort complex to include a total of six hotels with 4,000 total [coomsAmits] resort units (including the existing [500— mom] 452-room hotel).

[Kuilima Resort Company completed] In connection with the anticipated development of the Turtle Bay Resort property, an environmental impact statement (EIS) [for the prepesed development in 1085, as required by the City’s develepment approval process.] was prepared in 1985 by the then- owner of the property, Kuilima Resort Company. The EIS was accepted as final under the Hawaii Envirenmental Pelicy Act (HEPA). When a subdivision application in support of the resort expansion was submitted in 2005, a cealitien of community groups filed a civil lawsuit to require the resert [owners] owner to prepare [ac—tipda1ed]a supplemental EIS (SEIS). In April 2010, the Hawaii Supreme Court decided in favor of the community groups and ruled that an [updated-E-IS] SEIS was required under [state envirenmental law before any ground could be breken en the project. j HEPA. Accordingly, an SEIS was prepared in 2013 by then-ewner of the property, Turtle Bay Resort, LLC, and the SEIS was accepted as final under HEPA.

[ The State of Hawaii Supreme Court, in Unite Her& Locals v. City and County of Henelulu (Ne. 28602, April 8,2010), feund that the 1986 EIS centained a time frame that prejected project completion in three phases, with the last phase starting in 1996. In the majority opinion, tho Court noted that several elements ef the EIS did net address current environmontal cenditiens, such as the presence of Hawaiian monk scale and groan cop

+1 nIne, nnrI lrnff,r’ 1

To allay community concerns regarding environmental and infrastructural impacts associated with the full development permitted under the entitlements, in 2013 the then-owner of Turtle Bay Resort entered into negotiations with the State of HawaH, various community groups, and interested individuals to preserve portions of the Turtle Bay Resort area in perpetuity.13 In October of 2015, the parties arrived at an unprecedented conservation alternative to the plans for full development. The then-owner of Turtle Bay Resort: (1) transferred fee title to approximately 53 acres at Kawela Bay to the State of Hawaw, which was then leased back to the owner of Turtle Bay Resort for a term of 65 years; (2) transferred fee title to approximately 7.6 acres, also at Kawela Bay, to the City and County of Honolulu, which is currently managed by the owner of Turtle Bay Resort; and (3) encumbered approximately 568 acres of the Turtle Bay Resort property with a conservation easement that prohibits development in perpetuity. In effect, the owner of the Turtle Bay Resort agreed for itself and all future owners of the Turtle Bay Resort property to forego the opportunity to deyelop over 620 acres of land. As a result, almost two-thirds of the total Turtle Bay Resort property have been preserved as open space. and public access trails throughout the property have been established for future generations to enioy.

13 Until approximately 2013, many residents of Ko’olau Loa did not support the resort expansion due to concerns about traffic impacts on the two lanes of , the capacities of existing infrastructure systems and public services to accommodate the future proiected demand (such as water, wastewater. electrical systems, police and fire protection, and emergency services), and the potential impacts to archaeological, cultural, and natural resources. Labor force issues related to population growth, housing demand, and transportation, as well as a desire to preserve the undeveloped shoreline and scenic view planes, and maintain the region’s rural character, were also concerns. Although there was general support for existing hotel operations, community discussions about the future development of the resort continued, pending completion of an updated EIS. Community concerns about the proposed resort expansion included;

• Preserving the uninterrupted shoreline and scenic view plane, as well as the cultural and historic significance of the area for future generations;

4.-’,. .-,n,’.rnnrn+n nntr’,nn I .“,n,l n+kr,.. , ,nr.n tkn+ nv,-’n,-. • Proyiding for appropriate recreational and other uses that are compatible with existing land uses;

• Maintaining the yiability of the existing Turtle Bay Resort, restaurants, condominiums, and golf courses as an employment base for the region;

• Minimizing the impacts of future development;

• Providing for appropriate agricultural and other compatible uses in the mauka area. • Developing design guidelines for any proposed additional structures to assure their compatibility with the rural character of the region; and

• Acknowledging existing land use designations and development approvals that have already been granted.

Proponents of the resort expansion supported the creation of iobs and the regional economic benefits of additional visitors to the area, and the requirements to develop public shorline park improvements and worforce housing as conditions of the CitVs 1986 special management area use permit and shoreline setback variance approval.

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 3.8.1.1 Policies 3-52 Amend Policy section [This aroa] Plans to expand the resort should be maintained, with (2020) Sustainable surrounding areas to be preserved for open space and low impact Communities recreation. Resort expansion within the context of existing land use Plan approvals will provide a maior source of jobs for Koolau Loa and residents, significantly improve shoreline access and use ppportunities for residents, and include other amenities that may be enjoyed

. by residents and visitors alike. No further approvals resulting in an expansion of the existing resort beyond what is consistent with the already granted land use approvals should be granted.

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 3.8.1.2 Guidelines 3.52 Amend Guidelines Guidelines for the [usc of this prep should focus on preservation and low (2020) Sustainable section impact rocroation, within the context of existing land uco approvals.] resort Communities expansion should follow the approved Kuilima Resort Urban Design Plan, Plan which include the following:

• Shoreline Access - [Pcesecve] Enhance public access to the shoreline through the creation of two new major shorehne parks. Access through the main resort should also be retained with public parking provided.

• Natural Environment - Preserve and enhance existing features of topography, landscape, and views unique to [the-area] the various use districts within the resort.

• Views and Vistas - Site buildings and landscape areas in a manner that protects and emphasizes the dramatic coastal views from within the resort.

• Cultural Resources - Protect cultural resources and practices within the area.

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 5.7 Table 5-1 5-16 Amend Limit building heights to [three stories or ‘10foot, including roof form, with Consistency with Table 3-8 and (2020) Sustainable Policy/Guideline 85 for hoights abovo ‘10foot allowed only ‘.*on warrantod duo] four stories with a guideline stated in Section Communities Residential maximum height of 60 feet, including roof form, but may vary according to 3.5.2.3. DPP recommendation, Plan Communities — Low the required flood elevation, steep slope of the site, or the desire to protect see D-682 (2018). Density Apartment. important natural features. Gabled or similar roof forms should be used to reflect a primarily rural residential design character. Bill 79 Ko’olau Loa Plan Appendix A Open Space, Land A-2 Amend first paragraph The Community Growth Boundary defines, protects, and contains the (2020) Sustainable Use, and Public of Community Growth intended extent of the “built-up” or “settled” areas of rural communities. Its Communities Facilities Maps Boundary section to purposes are to provide adequate lands to support established Plan EXCLUDE a 50-acre communities, to protect such communities from more intense forms of area in north Laie development, and to preserve lands outside the boundary for agriculture or abbutting the existing other resource or open space values. Areas within this boundary industrial area, characteristically consist of relatively small, dispersed residential communities and towns. In Ko’olau Loa, the Community Growth Boundary includes the built areas of Kahuku, Lãie, Hauula, Punalu’u, Kahana, and Ka’a’awa[, and an approximately 50 acre aroa in north Lö’ic abutting thc oxisting industrial area at the municipal solid waste transfer station].

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan Appendix A Open Space, Land A-2 Amend the second At the area of Turtle Bay Resort, from west to east, the Community Growth (2020) Sustainable Use, and Public paragraph of the Boundary generally follows Kamehameha Highway, encompassing the Communities Facilities Maps Community Growth existing dwellings on the west side of Kawela Bay. Thereafter, it follows Plan Boundary section to: Kamehameha Highway towards the east, encompassing the Turtle Bay (1) DELETE reference Resort, and then north to the shoreline. The boundary circumscribes the to a 50-acre area in town of Kahuku and includes vacant areas for expansion of residential and north Laie abutting the industrial uses. On the mauka side of Kamehameha Highway, the boundary existing industrial includes [an approximate 50 acre vacant area in north Lãio adjacent to the area; and (2) existing industrial area at tho municipal solid waste transfer station] the Laie INCLUDE the Laie Corporation Yard and Convenience Center. Thereafter, it extends south, Corporation Yard and including the town of Lãie and the Brigham Young University-Hawaii and Convenience Center. vacant areas to support the expansion of Brigham Young University-Hawaii and the Polynesian Cultural Center. Thereafter, the boundary heads east to the shoreline at Laie Beach Park and includes the Lã’ie Town residential area makal of Kamehameha HIghway. Thereafter, the boundary circumscribes the rural communities of Hau’ula, Punalu’u, Kahana, Kaaawa.

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan Appendix A Open Space, Land A-4 Amend the first Single-family homes in country settings on medium-sized to large lots, on (2020) Sustainable Use, and Public paragraph of the Rural which rural development standards are employed and provisions for Communities Facilities Maps Residential section to pedestrian circulation, landscaping, and open space are emphasized. Rural Plan delete reference to Residential also contains minor pockets of existing apartments in Punalu’u smaller-sized single- and Turtle Bay, and [seme-sma#er-aie4-singte-family-lets-and-apactments- family lots and in north LYie, as well as] additional apartments for faculty and student apartment lots in north housing on the Brigham Young University-Hawaii campus to support its Laie. planned expansion.

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan Open Space Map, Appendix Maps Revise maps to reflect See attached sample Open Space Map, Land Use Map, and Public Amend Park, Resort, and Golf (2020) Sustainable Land Use Map, and Turtle Bay Facilities Map. Course designations. DPP Communities Public Facilities Map conservation recommendation, see D-682 Plan easement. (2018). Bill79 Ko’olau Loa — Plan Open Space Map, Appendix Maps Revise maps to See attached sample Open Space Map, Land Use Map, and Public (2020) Sustainable Land Use Map, and amend the Community Facilities Map. Communities Public Facilities Map Growth Boundary to: Plan (1) EXCLUDE approximately 50 acres of land within the northern boundary of the Laie Ahupuaa (the site is located adjacent to and east of the existing industrial designation); and (2) INCLUDE the Laie Corporation Yard and Convenience Center. AMENDMENT FORM DEVELOPMENT PLAN (DP) AND NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) PLAN

TOTAL PAGES: DATE: 29-Oct-20 COUNCILMEMBER: Heidi Tsuneyoshi

STAFF & PHONE EXT: Michael Sakata/x85037

SECTION or AMENDMENT MEASURE AMENDING SECTION OR AMENDMENT TEXT CLARIFICATION! PLAN TITLE EXHIBIT or PG NO. DESCRIPTION! NO. (RESO/BILL/PLAN) EXHIBIT TITLE (RAMSEVER NEW LANGUAGE) COMMENTS FIGURE NO. DETAILS

Bill79 Ko’olau Lea Plan 3.1.2.2 Shoreline Areas 3-6 Amend the 9th bullet • [Evaluate emerging policies relating to cilmate change and sea level DPP and OCCSR (2020) Sustainable in the section (3rd recommendation, see 0- rise-;] Incorporate best available science and information from the City Communities bullet on the page) 384 (2020). Climate Change Commission when evaluating updates to land use policies Plan and regulations relating to climate change and sea level rise.

Bill79 Ke’elau Lea Plan 3.1.2.4 Natural Gulches, 3-10 Update the 3rd bullet • Minimize soil erosion, and run:off of pesticides, fertilizers, and ether non DPP and OCCSR (2020) Sustainable Streams and recommendation, see 0- point source contaminants into streams, wetlands, and marine habitats with Cemmunities Drainageways 384 (2020). strategies such as stream setbacks, erosion control devices, integrated Plan management plans, and revegetatien of disturbed areas. Incorporate erosion control measures[;] and best management practices as recommended in the State of Hawaii Coastal Non-point Pollution Control

Program Management Plan[, Volume 1 (June 1096)] (October 2010), te prevent pollution of wetlands, streams, estuaries, and nearshore waters. ______

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 3.2 Agriculture 3-16 Update the last Under the State Constitution, the State is to identify important agricultural DPP recommendation, see D (2020) Sustainable paragraph of the lands (IAL). Once identified, these lands [cannot] may not be rezoned 384 (2020). Communities section except under a “super-majority’ yote. In 2005, Act 183 was adopted to Plan address this mandate, It established a two-step process: first, incentives to assure the long:term use and protection of IALare to be established, and second, with adequate state funding, the counties would prepare maps identifying IAL lands to be adopted by the State Land Use Commission. [Act 233 of] hi 2008, Act 233 adopted the incentive program. [As-ef-eacly 2012, the] The Department of Planning and Permitting [has bogun] began the mapping process in early 2012, resulting in the Honolulu City Council adopting Resolution 18-233, CD1, FD1, on June 5, 2019. Resolution 18- 233, CD1, FD1. recommended the designation of certain lands on as AL as required in Article XI, Section 3 of the State Constitution, and Chapter 205 of the Hawaii Reyised Statutes. Resolution 18-233. CD1, FD1. included maps and a list of tax map key numbers of lands proposed for IAL designation. The State Land Use Commission will make a final disposition of Dahu’s AL designation. Lands identified for agricultural purposes by this Sustainable Communities Plan [can sorvo as tho basic for the county mapping process] served as one of the criteria for identifying AL.

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 4.1 Transportation 4-2 Update the 7th According to the Oahu Regional Transportation Plan (ORTP) [2G3Q-(-OMPQ-DPP recommendation, see D (2020) Sustainable Systems paragraph of the Apri1-29Q6f] 2040 (OMPO, April 2016), there are no major improvement 384 (2020). Communities section (last projects [wNe}] that would involve increasing the capacity of Kamehameha Plan paragraph on the Highway. Planned highway improvements [in’:olvo] include a long-term page) bridge replacement program, shoreline reinforcement in areas such as Kaaawa, Punaluu, and Hauula where coastal erosion has impacted Kamehameha Highway, and safety and operational improvements such as the installation of turn lanes, guardrails, signage, and crosswalks at key intersections.

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 4.1 Transportation 4-3 Update the 10th Transit System. TheBus provides bus service island-wide, including the DPP recommendation, see D (2020) Sustainable Systems paragraph of the Koolau Loa community. On a normal weekday, nearly 40 percent of transit 384 (2020). Communities section (third full trips on TheBus are between home and work. More than 40 percent of the Plan paragraph on the weekday trips are for other home-based trips, such as to school or page) shopping. The remainder are non-home based trips and trips made by visitors. According to the ORTP [2030 (April 2006),] 2040 (OMPO, April 2016), TheBus system provides [9S] 108 numbered bus routes island-wide with a fleet of [525] 44 buses, including two bus routes (60 and 88A) that service the Koolau Loa region.

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 4.1 Transportation 4-4 Amend the last [Tho City DTS is in the procoss of updating the 1999 Honolulu Bicyclo DPP recommendation, seeD- (2020) Sustainable Systems paragraph of the Mastor Plan. While tho scope of the 1909 Plan is limitod to Honolulu’s 384 (2020). Communities section (last urban core botwoon Kahala and Pearl City, the updated plan willcover the Plan paragraph on the entiro island of Oahu.] The 2019 Oahu Bike Plan Update is an island-wide page) plan that proposes to add 575 miles of bikeway to the existing 211 miles of bike lanes. In Koolau Loa, the 2019 Bike Plan Update proposes the addition_of_38 miles of bikeway: a shoulder bikewav, and whenever possible, a parallel but separate shared use path along Kamehameha Highway and Farrington Highway. Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 4.2 Water Systems 4-7 Amends the third The State enacted the Water Code (HRS Chapter 174C) in 1987 to protect, DPP recommendation, see D (2020) Sustainable paragraph of the control, and regulate the use of the States water resources for the benefit of 384 (2020). Communities section its people and the environment. Under the Code, the City is responsible for Plan preparing the water use and development plan for the City and County of Honolulu. This plan, called the Oahu Water Management Plan (OWMP), [is] was prepared by the Department of Planning and Permitting with the assistance of the State Commission on Water Resource Management (CWRM) and the Board of Water Supply, and approved by the City Council following extensive public review and comment. The OWMP was adopted by the CWRM and the City Council in 1990. [The most recont revicion] Revisions of the Technical Reference Document for the OWMP (December 1998) [ineludes] include updated supporting data, analyses, and conclusions, which reflect the closing of Oahu Sugar Company and Waialua Sugar Company [and tho moot roccnt data and analytical rovicw]. Future revisions to the OWMP [shall] wUlbe submitted to the City Council for its review and approval.

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 4.2 Water Systems 4-7 Amends the fourth [T-he]Since 2013, the Board of Water Supply served as the primary agency DPP recommendation, see D (2020) Sustainable paragraph of the responsible for the implementation of the OWMP [ic ourrontly boing updatod 384 (2020). Communities section us4ng-the-watecshed-appceaeh-te--water-ceseucee-managemer4] to account Plan for [wator chod] watershed protection and water use and development. In 2016, the Board of Water Supply published the Water Master Plan (WMPL which has a planning horizon of 30 years. [To] In addition, to improve the integration of land use and water resources, [tho OWMP1 watershed planning has been divided into eight watershed management plans [(W.MP)], which coincide with the eight Development Plan and Sustainable Communities Plan areas. The goal of the [W-MR]watershed management jjj for each planning area is to formulate an environmentally holistic, community-based, and economically viable WMP balancing: (1) the preservation and managment of Oahu’s watersheds; and (2) sustainable ground and surface water use and development to serve present users and future generations. Each [W-MP-sha]1]watershed management plan will be submitted to the City Council for adoption by ordinance.

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan 4.5 Solid Waste Disposal 4-15 Amends the second The City’s Solid Waste Integrated Management Plan Update [(Octobor DPP recommendation, see 0- (2020) Sustainable and Handling paragraph of the 2008)] (November2019) outlines a comprehensive, unified approach to 384 (2020). Communities section such vital issues as landfill and disposal facility siting, expansion of existing Plan services and facilities, specialized waste disposal, waste reduction, and recycling strategies. Refuse generated by non-household sources is delivered to the H-POWER facility in Ewa. There is only one active landfill for Dahu (Waimanalo Gulch) in the Ewa area, which accepts municipal solid waste and H-POWER ash. The Waimanalo Gulch Santitary Landfill is operating on a limited term permit, and the City is [moving ahcad with planc to oxtond tho term of tho pormit. island wide rocycling and other waste divorcion programs aro boing inctitutod in an effort to oxtond tho ucoful lifo ef—this4andfilI]reguired to select an alternate location in anticipation of the closure of the landfill. Bill 79 Ko’olau Loa Plan Table 5-1 Implementation 5-8 Amend line item 14 of (Column #1) DPP recommendation, seeD- (2020) Sustainable Matrix Table 5-1 14. [Evaluato omorging policioc rolating to climate change and cop lovol 384 (2020). Communities ñse7] Incorporate best available science and information from the City Plan Climate Change Commission when evaluating updates to land use policies and regulations relating to climate change and sea level rise. (Column #2) TBD (Columns #3 and #4) [TBD TBD] QCCSR Advocate DPP Implementer, Regulator

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan Table 5-1 Implementation 5-22 Add a new line item (Column #1) i4i DPP recommendation, seeD- (2020) Sustainable Matrix 141 to Table 5-1 Plans to expand the resort should be confined to the resort owner’s 384 (2020). Communities agreement commitments, with surrounding areas to be preserved for open Plan space and low impact recreation. No further approvals resulting in an expansion of the existing resort beyond what is consistent with the already granted land use approvals should be granted. (Column #2) Conservation Easement, Subdivision Rules and Regulations, Project Review (Columns #3 and #4) DPP Regulator

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan Table 5-1 Implementation 5-22 In former line item 141 (Column #1) DPP recommendation, seeD- (2020) Sustainable Matrix of Table 5-1, amend [1-4-1-5]142. Preserve and enhance public access to the shoreline through 384 (2020). Communities the text in the first the creation of two new major shoreline parks. Public access through the Plan column main resort should also be retained with public parking provided. (Column #2) Project Review, Park Creation/Maintenance (Columns #3 and #4) [DPP Rcgulator/Advocatc] DPR Implementer DLNR Implementer

Bill79 Ko’olau Lea Plan Table 5-1 Implementation 5-22 Amend first column of (Column #1) [4-42T] DPP recommendation, see D (2020) Sustainable Matrix former line item 142 of 14 Preserve and enhance existing features of topography, landscapes. 384 (2020). Communities Table 5-1 (no changes and views unique to the area. Plan to ether columns)

Bill79 Koolau Lea Plan Table 5-1 Implementation 5-22 Add a new line item (Column #1) 144. DPP recommendation, see D (2020) Sustainable Matrix 144 to Table 5-1 Site and landscape buildings in a manner that protects and emphasizes the 384 (2020). Communities dramatic coastal views. (Column #2) Plan Project Review (Columns #3 and #4) DPP Reaulator Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan Table 5-1 Implementation 5-22 Amend first column of (Column #1) [1-4S] DPP recommendation, seeD- (2020) Sustainable Matrix former line item 143 of 145. Protect cultural resources and practices within the area. 384 (2020). Communities Table 5-1 (no changes Plan to other columns)

Bill79 Ko’olau Loa Plan Table 5-1 Implementation 5-22 Renumber Renumber line items from 144 through 225, as 146 through 227. DPP recommendation, seeD- (2020) Sustainable Matrix subsequent line items 384 (2020). Communities in Table 5-1 Plan

Bill 79 Ko’olau Loa Plan Public Facilities Map Appendix Map Add a Shared Use See attached sample Public Facilities Map. DPP recommendation, see D (2020) Sustainable Path between Kahuku 384 (2020). Communities and Laie. Also add a Plan Shared Use Path symbol to the map legend.