GEOCHEMICAL MINERALOGY by VLADIMIR IVANOVICH VERNADSKY and the PRESENT TIMES Boris Ye
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
98 New Data on Minerals. 2013. Vol. 48 GEOCHEMICAL MINERALOGY BY VLADIMIR IVANOVICH VERNADSKY AND THE PRESENT TIMES Boris Ye. Borutzky Fersman Mineralogical museum, RAS, Moscow, [email protected] The world generally believes that “the science of science” about natural matter – mineralogy – became obsolete and was replaced by the new science – geochemistry, by V.I. Vernadsky. This is not true. Geochemistry was and is never separated from mineralogy – its fundament. Geochemistry studies behaviour of chemical elements main- ly within the minerals, which are the basic form of inorganic (lifeless) substance existence on the Earth conditions. It also studies redistribution of chemical elements between co-existing minerals and within the minerals, by vari- able conditions of mineral-forming medium during the mineral-forming processes. On the other hand, owing to V.I. Vernadsky, mineralogy became geochemical mineralogy, as it took in the ideas and methods of chemistry, which enables to determine chemical composition, structure and transformation of minerals during the certain geological processes in the Earth history. 1 photo, 20 references. Keywords: Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky, mineralogy, geochemistry, geology, physics of solids, mineral-forming process, paragenesis, history of science. Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky’s remark- into several stages. Forming his personality of able personality and his input to the Earth sci- scientist-mineralogist and the main input into ences, first of all, to mineralogy – changing it reformation of Russian mineralogy and creation from the trendy mineral collecting hobby, of mineralogical science in Russia are related observation of mineral beauty, art and culture with the early, “Moscow” stage (1988–1909). areas into the mineralogical science, are not to At that time, on the recommendation of profes- be expressed. Even at present, over a century sor Alexey Petrovich Pavlov, Vladimir Ivano- since, his studies impress with its full of vich was invited to occupy the post of associate thought, unity, systematic character and wide professor in mineralogy at the mineralogical approach to investigation of natural objects, department at the Moscow State University, for deep analysis of previous publications in this giving lectures in mineralogy at the natural his- area. His activity amazes with unusual dedica- tory faculty (1890). Since 1891 he became a tion and uncompromisingness for organization director of Mineral cabinet and since 1892 research and fight with traditional conser- became the head of the department and started vatism, with solution of principal issues of sci- giving lectures in mineralogy, crystallography ence and with creation of progressive scientif- and natural history both at the natural depart- ic mineralogical school in Russia. Scientific ment of the physics-mathematical faculty and ideas by Vernadsky are actual at present not in mineralogy at the medical faculty and also less, but even more than 100 years ago, when (since 1901) – at the Moscow high women’s not all the mineralogists could accept and courses. During that time (1891) he defended understand them. According to Dmitriy Iva- his thesis for a mastery’s degree in geology and novich Scherbakov’s memoirs: “Vladimir Iva- geognosy, the topic is “On sillimanite group novich in his addictive aspiration forward was and the role of alumina in silicates” (Vernadsky, often taking the lead over scientific ideas of his 1891). Later he obtained his PhD on the theme epoch. Sometimes he was not understood and “Phenomena of sliding of crystal matter (phy- his thoughts were underestimated by his con- sics-crystallographic study” (Vernadsky, 1897). temporaries. But his outstanding scientific in- The fundament of those lectures (which tuition always lead him by the right way and his were later re-published as textbooks) and scien- clear-sightedness helped to create the number tific generalizations was strict unified method- of new leading courses with perspective future” ology, which was not accidental, sudden happy (Scherbakov, 1963, p. 34, 35). striking, but it resulted from the huge, purpose- ful work. Vernadsky analysed in detail what was Vladimir I. Vernadsky – as a mineralogist done by different scientists from different coun- tries to reveal trends in development of scientif- As to the memoirs by Boris Leonidovich ic ideas, collective input in the whole image of Lichkov (Lichkov, 1948; 1963), scientific cre- knowledge of construction and laws of the envi- ative work of V.I. Vernadsky could be divided ronment, of the Universe. We will not replicate Geochemical mineralogy by Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky and the present times 99 the scientist’s well-known biography facts, but Fig. 1. Vladimir will mention only those, which are necessary for Ivanovich Ver- nadsky. the topic of this paper and our grounds for us Photo 1905 year. characterizing mineralogy of Vernadsky as geo- chemical mineralogy and not geochemistry. As the basic documents we will cite scientific works by Vernadsky himself, his letters and tes- timonies of his contemporaries. First of all, Vladimir Ivanovich had brilliant teachers at the Saint-Petersburg University, which he was graduated from in 1885 at the nat- ural history department of physics-mathemati- cal faculty. His tutors were outstanding Russian scientists, who contributed a lot into the world science. The lecturer and examiner in chem- istry was Dmitriy Ivanovich Mendeleev – the creator of Periodic Table of chemical elements. Lectures in geology and mineralogy were given by Vassiliy Vassilyevich Dokuchaev – the founder of revolutionary new direction in soil science. Under his tuition Vernadsky practised in the fieldwork, studying soils of Nizhegorod- skaya and Poltavskaya provinces, with geologi- cal mapping; and also actively worked in Mi- neralogical cabinet of the University. Still being research should be learnt there, in advanced as a student, he was interested in problems of mi- to Russian development. neral genesis, which he described in Brockhaus After a short visit at the foreign correspond- and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary (Vernad- ing member of the Imperial Russian academy of sky, 1892). His tutor was also Sergey Fedoro- science, professor Archangello Skakki, Vladi- vich Glinka – who supported traditional views mir Ivanovich moved to Munich for visiting in mineralogy, however brilliant mineral expert. well-known mineralogist and crystallographer, After graduating from the University, Vla- professor Paul Groth and physicist crystallogra- dimir Ivanovich obtained a position of the keep- pher Leonard Zonke. At Groth’s laboratory er of the Mineral cabinet and after successful (1888–1889) he synthesised triethyl ester of passing his masters exam (1887) he was appre- trimesic acid, which seems to have nothing in ciated with the overseas trip (1988). common with mineralogy. But the essentials are It is usually considered that he was busy that Groth was the first who understood and with deep studying crystallography there and decided to express an idea that crystal can be since that sometimes “Moscow” stage is subdi- described simultaneously both as molecule of vided into two: crystallographic and mineralo- chemical compound (which until nowadays gical. But it is not quite, as we can read from the remains as empirical chemical formula of the Vernadsky’s detailed autobiographical abstract mineral) and endless three-dimensional pattern to the 4th edition of his lectures he gave at the with atoms in lattice points. At that time he was Moscow University in 1910–1912: “Almost all busy with this problem since 1870s and then mineralogy departments at the universities and was first who understood and promoted in self- high technical and medical schools were occu- founded magazine Zeitschrift für Krystal- pied with not mineralogists, but geologists… Me lographie the works by Evgraf Stepanovich Fe- myself, the follower of V.V. Dokuchaev and dorov, who was repelled in Russia and Arthur S.F. Glinka at the Petersburg University, got the Moritz Schoenflies. Later Groth was one of the scientific training in methods of research only initiators of X-ray analysis application in mine- abroad, in Munich and Paris” (Vernadsky, Kur- ralogy, after professor of physics Max von Laue batov, 1937, p. 38). This edition was prepared in proved the possibility of diffraction of X-rays on cooperation with Sergey Mikhailovich Kur- crystal lattice and in 1912 in presence of Groth batov under the title “The Earth silicates, alumi- and with assistance of Walter Friedrich and nosilicates and their analogues”. Paul Knipping obtained the first X-ray picture Thus, Vernadsky considered western coun- of halite. tries as providers of progressive trends in mine- Describing the fundamental changes in ralogy and crystallography and new methods of crystallography Vladimir Ivanovich wrote: “At 100 New Data on Minerals. 2013. Vol. 48 the end of the XIX and beginning of the XX cen- silicon and aluminium – the most important tury in crystallography there was formed new chemical elements on Earth. The latter was the precise geometrical conception about crystal, basis of his above mentioned Masters disserta- which replaced the previous idea about crystal tion (Vernadsky, 1891) and later this investiga- polyhedra. Crystal is considered to be an end- tion was the central one amongst his innovative less system of homologous points within space, studies of the huge group of petrologically which distribution meets the basic geometric important aluminosilicates,