DOCSLIB.ORG

Access to Abortion Services for Women in the EU

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Access to Abortion Services for Women in the EU IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS Requested by the FEMM committee Access to abortion services for women in the EU Slovakia Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 659.922– October 2020 EN Access to abortion services for women in the EU Slovakia Abstract This paper, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the FEMM Committee, provides basic information on access to abortion services in Slovakia. The legal status of abortions in the country is under permanent pressure despite the legally binding decision by the Constitutional Court back in 2007 which safeguarded women´s right to free choice. Eleven proposals to restrict abortion have been presented in the National Parliament, in the last two years. Medical abortion is not available in the country, and together with conscientious objection applied in health services and current COVID-19 pandemics access to abortion services is further limited. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Women’s rights and Gender Equality. AUTHORS Olga Pietruchova, independent gender equality expert, Slovakia ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE Martina SCHONARD EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Sandrina MARCUZZO LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU internal policies. To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe for updates, please write to: Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels Email: [email protected] Manuscript completed in October 2020 © European Union, 2020 This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. © Cover image from the authors database. The poster used in a campaign against an abortion ban in 2002 by the Proc-choice coalition Access to abortion services for women in the EU - Slovakia CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 4 LIST OF FIGURES 5 LIST OF BOXES 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 GENERAL INFORMATION ON SRHR IN SLOVAKIA 7 1.1. Abortion and SRHR debate in Slovakia 7 1.2. National laws relating to accessing abortion 8 1.3. Abortion incidence and contraceptive use in Slovakia 9 Abortion incidence 9 Contraceptive use 10 ACCESS TO ABORTION SERVICES 11 2.1. Procedure and methods available 11 2.2. Public insurance schemes 12 2.3. Conscientious objection 12 2.3.1. Conscientious objection by abortion providers 12 2.3.2. Conscientious objection in access to contraception 13 2.4. Access to abortion during the COVID-19 pandemics 13 3. CURRENT TRENDS AND ACTIVITIES 15 3.1. Civil society stakeholders 15 3.1.1. Anti-choice 15 3.1.2. Pro-choice 15 3.2. Recent legal proposals to restrict abortions 16 3.2.1. Response by the civil society and experts 18 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION TO EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 19 REFERENCES 20 ANNEX 21 I. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 21 Concluding observations on the combined fifth and sixth periodic reports of Slovakia in the area of health (CEDAW/C/SVK/CO/5-6, 20/11/2015) 21 PE 659.922 3 IPOL | Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CEDAW Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women CoE Council of Europe FIAPAC International Federation of Professional Abortion and Contraception Associates FIGO International Federation for Gynaecology and Obstetrics MEP Member of European Parliament MoH Ministry of Health MP Member of Parliament MS Member States NCZI National Health Information Centre OĽANO Obyčajní ľudia a nezávislé osobnosti, Ordinarly people and independent personalities (rulling party in Slovakia) SaS Sloboda a solidarity, Freedom and Solidarity (political party in Slovakia) SRHR Sexual and reproductive health and rights WHO Word Health Organisation 4 PE 659.922 Access to abortion services for women in the EU - Slovakia LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Development of general abortion and miscarriage rate in Slovakia 9 Figure 2 Development of contraceptive use in Slovakia 10 LIST OF BOXES Box 1 Main legal problems and challenges 11 Box 2 Main problems and challenges in access to abortion 13 PE 659.922 5 IPOL | Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Access to sexual and reproductive healthcare services is a fundamental component of sexual and reproductive rights. Under international human rights law and standards, European Union Member States should ensure access to safe and quality sexual and reproductive healthcare. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), sexual and reproductive rights is an umbrella term for four separate areas: sexual health, sexual rights, reproductive health, and reproductive rights (SRHR). The situation regarding SRHR in Slovakia does not only meet required international standards, but it has worsened in the last two decades. The legal status of abortions in the country is being constantly challenged despite the legally binding decision by the Constitutional Court back in 2007 which safeguarded woman’s rights to reproductive self-determination. Eleven proposals to restrict abortion have been presented in the National Parliament, in the last two years. As the abortion debate in the country is very emotional, it is often misused by some political parties to conceal more serious political problems. The general public in Slovakia is rather favourable in supporting the free choice of women when deciding about abortion. According to the latest opinion poll1, only 17% of the respondents want to tighten access to abortion for women. Nonetheless, the predominant role of the religious and conservative institutions and actors in the country and its influence on policymakers all-across the political spectrum hampers and obstructs any possible positive development. The best example is the unavailability of medical abortion, even though the pill was registered by the Slovak Drugs Agency back in 2013. Because of the lobbying of the Catholic Church by the Prime Minister, the Ministry of Health did not authorise its use in practice2. The relatively high financial cost of abortion (which equals the minimum living costs in the country) and contraception make it inaccessible for groups of women at risk of poverty and social exclusion, students, and women from the Roma community. Furthermore, the conscientious objection applicable in the health services sector and the currently ongoing COVID- 19 pandemics limit access to abortion services further, particularly in areas with a strong influence of the religious and conservative institutions and actors. Consequently, the civil society under the lead of some feminist NGOs can only focus on keeping the status quo instead of lobbying for positive development. On one hand, they are in such a situation loaded with advocacy activities; on the other hand, the government has de facto cancelled the financial support. Thus, the SRHR in the country is at risk as never before. Aim The aim of this paper if to provide comprehensive background information about SRHR, particularly abortion rights and services, in Slovakia. 1 http://www.ivo.sk/8705/sk/aktuality/vo-verejnosti-prevazuje-nazor-ze-sucasny-interrupcny-zakon-netreba-menit 2 https://spravy.pravda.sk/domace/clanok/323472-potratova-tabletka-na-slovensku-nebude/ 6 PE 659.922 Access to abortion services for women in the EU - Slovakia GENERAL INFORMATION ON SRHR IN SLOVAKIA Abortion debate started in Slovakia after the adoption and ratification of the Concordat with the Holy See (2000). During the two decades, several legal proposals have been discussed in the National Parliament to restrict access to abortion and family planning methods. 1.1. Abortion and SRHR debate in Slovakia In 2001, a group of conservative MPs filed a motion to the Constitution Court to examine the abortion law. It was a reaction to the failed attempt to ban abortions in an amendment to the Slovak constitution in 2001. Article 15 of the Slovak constitution says that everyone has a right to live and that human life is worth protecting even before birth. The abortion law, on the other hand, allows for abortions to be carried out up to the 12th week of pregnancy. The MPs who submitted the motion said that the act on abortions contradicts the sentence in the Constitution that says that human life is worth protection even before birth. They argued that in Slovakia, it is legal to perform abortions within the first three months without giving any reason. In 2007, the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic held abortion on demand of a pregnant woman in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy conforms with the right to life (including the clause stating that human life is worthy of protection even before birth) as set out in the Constitution.3 The court ruled that the procedure protects the foetus, as a woman must go through a tough procedure if she wants an abortion, under the law: filing a request, receiving a medical examination, going through an interview with a doctor, receiving a second approval of the decision, and paying for the surgery. The time limit of 12 weeks is associated with the physiology of the developing foetus. The court gave woman’s right to reproductive self-determination a full and equal standing in the constitutional order, using a balancing framework, according to which multiple constitutional rights and values are vindicated, none completely overruling any other, and favouring compromised rather than absolute regulation.4 Several attempts to restrict the access to abortion have been discussed in the National Parliament, since the Constitutional Court ruling.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No 01 (180) 2019
    CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights No 01 (180) 2019 Table of contents: Burning Issue Regional Updates Resources Upcoming events BURNING ISSUE We won’t keep quiet! Solidarity statement with Slovakia As part of the international campaign of 16 days of activism against violence against women civil society in Slovakia gathered at a protest and march across Bratislava to voice its demands and protest against structural gender based violence, especially any steps limiting access to abortion. The march was called Nebudeme ticho! (We won´t keep quiet!) and was organised by Moznost Volby (ASTRA member organisation), ASPEKT, Bratislava bez náckov and Povstanie pokračuje. In May 2018, the far-right political party in the Parliament proposed an amendment to the abortion law. According to the new law, abortion would be accessible only in three cases: if woman´s life is in danger; if pregnancy was a result of crime and in cases of foetal damage. Only women with Slovak citizenship would be allowed to get abortion in Slovakia under the proposed law. The amendment was supported by the Catholic Church and some conservative politicians. The law did not get a second reading but not because of the content but because of the fascist political party itself. Other parties did not want to be associated with this group. However, as a result of this discussion an agreement among conservative politicians came about – they promised to prepare a new law, the one that would connect politicians in the coalition and opposition in the Parliament. In September, there was another law put forward – the content and consequences would be the same as in the first 1 case, just explanation and language of the law had been changed.
    [Show full text]
  • CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights No 10 (189) 2019 BURNING ISSUE
    CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights No 10 (189) 2019 Table of contents: Burning Issue Regional Updates From ASTRA members Resources BURNING ISSUE Slovak abortion law stays intact after an attempt of limiting access to abortion At the end of November, a draft of a bill limiting access to abortion in Slovakia was presented to the Slovak Parliament. The bill, presented to the Parliament by three members of a conservative Slovak National Party was drafted to oblige women and pregnant persons to undergo an ultrasound before terminating a pregnancy. It also banned advertising abortion services and forced doctors to enable the patient to listen to the heartbeat of the embryo or fetus. After a heated discussion in Slovak Parliament, several new amendments were introduced to the document, including: Prolongation of a mandatory waiting period from current 48 hours to 96 hours; The need for informing spouse/a man (the proponents of the draft amendment use: “father of the unborn”) about the existence of pregnancy and her intention to terminate her pregnancy; Reinstating prescriptions for emergency contraception. As a result of the proposal, a protest took place in Bratislava. Those in attendance declared their outrage by an attempt to limit access to abortion and protested against gender-based violence. Slovak Parliament voted on the bill on 5th December, with following results: Present: 124 Number of MPs who voted: 123 In favor: 59 Against: 24 Abstained: 40 Did not vote: 1 Therefore the bill did not pass the voting, although by majority that abstained from the voting rather than voting against proposed change.
    [Show full text]
  • A Health and Rights Approach to Abortion in Ireland Irish Family Planning Association
    Submission to the Citizens’ Assembly A health and rights approach to abortion in Ireland Irish Family Planning Association 16.12.16 Contents IFPA position on the Eighth Amendment .................................................................................... 4 Glossary of terms ............................................................................................................................... 6 About the IFPA .................................................................................................................................. 10 A leading provider of sexual and reproductive health services ...................................... 10 Vision .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Mission ............................................................................................................................................ 10 An advocate for the right to reproductive health ................................................................ 11 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Why does the IFPA believe the Eighth Amendment should be repealed? ............ 12 1.2 Why the IFPA is not in favour of reform that allows abortion only in exceptional cases ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutionalizing Fetal Rights: a Salutary Tale from Ireland
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Michigan School of Law Michigan Journal of Gender & Law Volume 22 Issue 2 2015 Constitutionalizing Fetal Rights: A Salutary Tale from Ireland Fiona de Londras Birmingham Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjgl Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Family Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Fiona de Londras, Constitutionalizing Fetal Rights: A Salutary Tale from Ireland, 22 MICH. J. GENDER & L. 243 (2015). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjgl/vol22/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Gender & Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONSTITUTIONALIZING FETAL RIGHTS: A SALUTARY TALE FROM IRELAND iona de ondras In 1983, Ireland became the first country in the world to con- stitutionalize fetal rights. The 8th Amendment to the Constitution, passed by a referendum of the People, resulted in constitutional pro- tection for “the right to life of the unborn,” which was deemed “equal” to the right to life of the “mother.” Since then, enshrining fetal rights in constitutions and in legislation has emerged as a key part of anti-abortion campaigning. This Article traces the constitu- tionalization of fetal rights in Ireland and its implications for law, politics, and women.
    [Show full text]
  • CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Rights No 06 (74) 2009
    CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN WOMEN’S NET WORK FOR SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND RIGHTS CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Rights No 06 (74) 2009 Table of contents: • Burning Issue • Regional Updates • Global Updates • Upcoming Events • Publications • Call For Applications BURNING ISSUE Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health in Poland. Anand Grover, the Special Rapporteur (SR) on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (the Right to Health) was in Poland from May 4 to May 12. The purpose of his mission was to assess how Poland implements the right to health. The visit was focused on three major issues: sexual and reproductive health rights, HIV and harm reduction, drug dependence treatments and relevant laws, policies and practices, and their impact on the enjoyment of the right to health. To understand all the elements of the problems considered, the SR met representatives of the Ministry of Health and Ministry for Foreign Affairs, health professionals' organizations, representatives of the international organizations, and NGOs. The Federation for Women and Family Planning organized the SR’s meeting with representatives of NGOs dealing with sexual and reproductive health and rights (abortion, in-vitro fertilization, delivery and sexual education), drug users, HIV/AIDS and LGBT. In the press release held after those meetings, Anand Grover listed criminalization of abortion, conscientious objection (impeding legal abortion and even access to contraception and emergency contraception), lack of comprehensive sexuality education, non-State actors’ interference with the access to legal and safe abortions as his main concerns regarding lack of access to sexual and reproductive health services in Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Polic Es
    CENTRE DELÀS REPORT 36 GENDER AND SECURITY POLIC ES A feminist look into the impacts of militarization in the West Author: Nora Miralles Published by: Centre Delàs d’Estudis per la Pau Carrer Erasme de Janer 8, entresol, despatx 9 08001 Barcelona T. 93 441 19 47 www.centredelas.org [email protected] With the collaboration of Guillem Mases Galvadà With the support of the Agència Catalana de Cooperació al Desenvolupament Barcelona, January 2019 Design and layout: Esteva&Estêvão Cover photo: Adolfo Lujan; p. 5: Wikimedia Commons; p. 7, 12, 17, 22, 27: Adolfo Lujan; p. 9: brefoto; p. 19: Shaun Dawson; p. 30: Rafal Zambrzycki D.L.: B-19744-2010 ISSN: 2013-8032 INDEX Executive summary . 5 1 . Introduction . 7 2 . The government of insecurity and the crusade against gender . 9 2.1 Insecurity as a form of government ...............................9 2.2 Masculinity, white identity, security and power . .10 3 . Shaking the foundations: the feminist theories on security . 12 3.1 Everyday violence and the need for feminist security.............12 3.2 An introduction to the feminist theories on security..............13 3.3 The criticisms of human security on gender .....................14 4 . Methodology of case analysis . 17 4.1 Structure of the analysis and indicators..........................18 5 . The dimensions of gender insecurity in the west . 19 5.1 The United States of America, an army of 40 million of poor people ..................................................19 5.2 Gender insecurity in European fortes . 26 Conclusions . 35 Bibliography . 37 Annex . 39 GENDER AND SECURITY POLICIES 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The rights of women and of non-normative sexual and gender identities are found throughout the world, but also in the West, under a threat which has already begun to erode advances that we thought were solid and which could lead to an increase in gender inequalities in the short term - including the formal ones -, as well as direct and structural vio- lence and, in particular, the impunity that has sustained them up to now.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovakia: Fertility Between Tradition and Modernity
    Demographic Research a free, expedited, online journal of peer-reviewed research and commentary in the population sciences published by the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research Konrad-Zuse Str. 1, D-18057 Rostock · GERMANY www.demographic-research.org DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH VOLUME 19, ARTICLE 25, PAGES 973-1018 PUBLISHED 01 JULY 2008 http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/25/ DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.25 Research Article Slovakia: Fertility between tradition and modernity Michaela Potančoková Boris Vaňo Viera Pilinská Danuša Jurčová This publication is part of Special Collection 7: Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe (http://www.demographic-research.org/special/7/) © 2008 Potančoková et al. This open-access work is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 2.0 Germany, which permits use, reproduction & distribution in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author(s) and source are given credit. See http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/de/ Table of Contents 1 Introduction 974 2 Fertility trends 975 2.1 Fertility tempo and quantum: from early and high towards later 975 and lower fertility 2.2 Transition to motherhood and timing of births 979 2.3 Completed family size and childlessness 984 2.4 Fertility outcomes of women by educational attainment and 986 marital status 2.5 Roma population: contrasting reproductive behavior 990 3 Proximate determinants of fertility 992 3.1 Changes in family formation 992 3.2 Sexual behavior and contraceptive
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoned and Stigmatized the Impact of the Irish Abortion Law on Women
    ABANDONED AND STIGMATIZED THE IMPACT OF THE IRISH ABORTION LAW ON WOMEN ReproductiveRights.org ABANDONED AND STIGMATIZED THE IMPACT OF THE IRISH ABORTION LAW ON WOMEN © 2014 Center for Reproductive Rights Printed in the United States Any part of this report may be copied, translated, or adapted with permission from the authors, provided that the parts copied are distributed free or at cost (not for profit) and the Center for Reproductive Rights is acknowledged as the author. Any commercial reproduction requires prior written permission from the author. The Center for Reproductive Rights would appreciate receiving a copy of any materials in which information from this report is used. Center for Reproductive Rights 120 Wall Street, 14th Floor New York, NY 10005 United States Tel +1 917 637 3600 Fax +1 917 637 3666 [email protected] reproductiverights.org ReproductiveRights.org INTRODUCTION The experiences of women who are denied health care and information due to Ireland’s extremely restrictive abortion law, and who are consequently forced to travel abroad to access abortion services, are harrowing. The Center for Reproductive Rights (“Center”), an international non-governmental legal advocacy organization dedicated to promoting and defending women’s reproductive rights worldwide, is working closely with women in Ireland affected by the country’s extremely restrictive abortion law. The Center is representing two Irish women in cases pending before the Human Rights Committee (“HRC”) that challenge the denial of abortion services in Ireland to women that have received a diagnosis of fatal fetal anomaly. The extremely restrictive abortion law has had little impact on women’s need to access abortion services.
    [Show full text]
  • REPEALING the 8TH the 8TH Reforming Irish Abortion Law
    FIONA DE LONDRAS MMAIREADÁIRÉAD ENRIGHT REPEALINGREPEALING THE 8TH THE 8TH Reforming Irish abortion law WITH NEW POSTSCRIPT POLICY PRESSPOLICY & PRACT ICE FIONA DE LONDRAS MÁIRÉAD ENRIGHT REPEALING THE 8TH Reforming Irish abortion law POLICY PRESSPOLICY & PRACT ICE First published in Great Britain in 2018 by Policy Press North America office: University of Bristol Policy Press 1-9 Old Park Hill c/o The University of Chicago Press Bristol 1427 East 60th Street BS2 8BB Chicago, IL 60637, USA UK t: +1 773 702 7700 t: +44 (0)117 954 5940 f: +1 773 702 9756 [email protected] [email protected] www.policypress.co.uk www.press.uchicago.edu © Policy Press 2018 The digital PDF version of this title is available Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits adaptation, alteration, reproduction and distribution for non-commercial use, without further permission provided the original work is attributed. The derivative works do not need to be licensed on the same terms. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested. ISBN 978-1-4473-4751-4 (hardback) ISBN 978-1-4473-4752-1 (ePub) ISBN 978-1-4473-4753-8 (Mobi) ISBN 978-1-4473-4754-5 (OA PDF) The right of Fiona de Londras and Máiréad Enright to be identified as authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-University Centre for Human Rights and Democratisation Compatibility of Concordats with Democratic Constitutions Case Stud
    INTER-UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRATISATION COMPATIBILITY OF CONCORDATS WITH DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONS CASE STUDY OF SLOVAKIA 2012 Katarína Kopčíková INTER-UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRATISATION COMPATIBILITY OF CONCORDATS WITH DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONS Case Study of Slovakia E.MA Thesis Thesis Supervisor: Professor Zdzislaw Kedzia Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań Academic year 2011/2012 Katarína Kopčíková ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank Professor Kedzia for his valuable comments, my family for their never-ending support and my fellow masterini for making this year unforgettable. Abstract The thesis is focused on the question of compatibility of concordats with democratic constitutions. Roman Catholic religion represented by the Holy See as the head of Vatican City State is the only religion with international personality that provides means to inter alia conclude international treaties with other states. These treaties usually aim at securing rights of the Church and her members to govern themselves in particular country independently from the government. However, concordats can regulate also religious freedom for Roman Catholic believers and even some other rights. One such example is a proposed Draft Treaty between the Slovak Republic and the Holy See on the Right to Exercise Objection of Conscience. Despite the fact that this treaty guarantees the exercise of conscientious objection to everyone, such claim has to be based on Roman Catholic teaching on faith and morals. In addition, exercise of this right is insufficiently limited. Therefore, if adopted, the Draft Treaty will result in violation of a guarantee of fundamental rights principle of legally consistent state as well as state´s obligations undertaken by ratification of international human rights treaties.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Peter Boylan, FRCPI, FRCOG, MAO Joint Committee on the Eighth
    Dr Peter Boylan, FRCPI, FRCOG, MAO Position Paper Joint Committee on the Eighth Amendment Wednesday, 18 October, 2017 Thank you for your invitation to appear before the Joint Committee on the Eighth Amendment to speak on my concerns and issues arising from the recommendations of the Citizens’ Assembly. The content of this statement is rooted in over four decades of practice as an Obstetrician Gynaecologist caring for women in Ireland, the United Kingdom and America since I qualified as a doctor in 1974. I hope to assist you in your deliberations. I am currently Chairman of the Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Ireland. My medical training was at the National Maternity Hospital, Dublin and Queen Charlotte’s and the Chelsea Hospital for Women, London. After training, I was appointed to an academic post at the University of Texas Houston Medical Center for four years. I was Master of the National Maternity Hospital (NMH) from 1991-1997 inclusive, and Clinical Director of NMH from 2008-2014. In 2012-13 I served as a member of the committee of independent experts established by the Minister of Health to advise the Government on the implementation of the European Court of Human Rights judgment in respect of the X Case. The outcome was The Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act (2013). In 2013 I was the independent expert witness for the coroner in the inquest into the death of Savita Halappanavar. In 2014 I was an expert witness for the family in the case of PP v HSE in the High Court. The Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Ireland has not been asked to provide a position paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Synthesis Preventing Abortion in Europe
    Preventing Abortion in Europe: Guaranteeing the Social Right Not to Abort This document is a synthesis of the book published in French: “Droit et prévention de l’avortement en Europe” (LEH Editions, 2016). This synthesis was presented on the 22 nd of June 2017 during a European Seminar on the prevention of abortion at the COMECE in Brussels. The European Centre for Law and Justice hereby thanks all the contributors for their expertise. PART I: THE BASIS OF THE DUTY TO PREVENT ABORTION ................................................................................ 3 A. THE FUNDAMENTAL GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF THE OBLIGATION TO PREVENT ABORTION ........................... 3 1. PROTECTION OF THE FAMILY : THE RIGHT TO FOUND A FAMILY ....................................................................................... 3 2. PROTECTION OF MATERNITY .................................................................................................................................. 4 3. PROTECTION OF HUMAN LIFE ................................................................................................................................. 5 4. PROTECTION FROM SOCIETY ................................................................................................................................... 9 B. POSITIVE OBLIGATION TO PREVENT THE RECOURSE TO ABORTION ........................................................... 10 PART II: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DUTY TO PREVENT ABORTION AND GUARANTEE THE RIGHT NOT TO ABORT ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]