DOCSLIB.ORG

CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Rights No 06 (74) 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN WOMEN’S NET WORK FOR SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND RIGHTS CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Rights No 06 (74) 2009 Table of contents: • Burning Issue • Regional Updates • Global Updates • Upcoming Events • Publications • Call For Applications BURNING ISSUE Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health in Poland. Anand Grover, the Special Rapporteur (SR) on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (the Right to Health) was in Poland from May 4 to May 12. The purpose of his mission was to assess how Poland implements the right to health. The visit was focused on three major issues: sexual and reproductive health rights, HIV and harm reduction, drug dependence treatments and relevant laws, policies and practices, and their impact on the enjoyment of the right to health. To understand all the elements of the problems considered, the SR met representatives of the Ministry of Health and Ministry for Foreign Affairs, health professionals' organizations, representatives of the international organizations, and NGOs. The Federation for Women and Family Planning organized the SR’s meeting with representatives of NGOs dealing with sexual and reproductive health and rights (abortion, in-vitro fertilization, delivery and sexual education), drug users, HIV/AIDS and LGBT. In the press release held after those meetings, Anand Grover listed criminalization of abortion, conscientious objection (impeding legal abortion and even access to contraception and emergency contraception), lack of comprehensive sexuality education, non-State actors’ interference with the access to legal and safe abortions as his main concerns regarding lack of access to sexual and reproductive health services in Poland. Despite the Polish Government's ratification of numerous human rights treaties, access of women to certain reproductive health services, such as contraception, pre-natal testing and abortion, is seriously impeded, he noted. Anand Grover’s full report on this mission will be presented at the 14 th session of the Human Rights Council, to be held in June 2010. This report will outline his analysis of the current situation concerning the enjoyment of the right to health in Poland and will make recommendations to the main actors, including the Government of Poland. Regrettably, this is not the first occasion when Poland’s endeavors in the area of sexual and reproductive rights and anti-discrimination policy are criticized by international body as it has just been put under infringement procedure for non-transposition of EU rules prohibiting gender discrimination in access to and supply of goods and services. The SR’s preliminary conclusions and observations are available here: http://www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/F1269CA5311CDAF3C12575B50041AEBE? opendocument REGIONAL UPDATES Commission Refers Poland to European Court of Justice on Gender Equality Legislation. Poland was referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for non-transposition of EU rules prohibiting gender discrimination in access to and supply of goods and services (Directive 2004/113/EC). Equal treatment is a fundamental right in the EU and this Directive is crucial to tackling discrimination on the basis of gender. The deadline to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive expired in 21 December 2007. The Commission sent the Polish authorities a Reasoned Opinion – the second stage of infringement proceedings – in June 2008, giving them two months to reply. They informed the Commission that they were in the process of preparing the necessary measures to fully transpose the Directive but have not yet communicated the adoption of these measures. Consequently, the Commission has decided to bring the case to the ECJ. Further information: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=420&langId=en Source: NEWW at http://www.neww.org/en/news/news/1,4904,3.html Germany to require three-day wait for abortions. The German parliament has voted to require a three-day waiting period before doctors authorize abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. The measure includes providing for more consultations and support for families with handicapped children who are considering abortion, the news service Deutsche Welle reported. The law will require women to receive counseling from a doctor about the medical and psychological consequences of abortion performed after the 20th week of pregnancy. Patients living with physically or mentally disabled children will be offered other means of support. In a vote of 612 parliamentarians, 326 delegates voted in favor of the measure, 234 voted against and 52 abstained. The law, set to come into effect in January 2010, will levy a fine of €10,000 for doctors who fail to comply. Abortion in Germany is legal in the first trimester of pregnancy, after the woman has received a certificate showing that she has received "counseling." Abortion is also permitted in certain cases after the first trimester. More: http://germany.angloinfo.com/countries/germany/abortion.asp Proposal to ban abortion after 24 weeks up for debate in Romanian Parliament. Abortion is currently prohibited in Romania after 14 weeks, with an exception granted where the health of the mother is at risk. The proposal up for debate in Parliament would disallow this exception after 24 weeks. The abortion would be criminally punishable for both the mother and the doctor. A new Criminal Code being prepared in Romania proposes to declare fetuses as persons once they have reached 24 weeks gestation, and to ban abortion after that stage of development. Romanian pro- choice organizations say the proposed changes to the law would be disastrous for the health of women, reports Le Courrier des Balkans. In a letter to members of Parliament on May 5, a group of NGOs wrote: Such a law would cause a significant decline of certain fundamental rights such as those to life, health, like the rights not to be subjected to inhuman or demeaning treatment and the right to non-discrimination on grounds of gender . 2 Source: http://www.anasaf.ro/en/index.html More: http://reproductiverights.org/en/press-room/romania-reconsiders-anti-abortion-amendment Attempts to limit access to abortion in Slovakia. Over the past few years there have been numerous attempts to limit access to abortion in Slovakia, including a constitutional court case brought by conservative MPs which sought to recognize that Slovakia's permissive abortion law is in violation of the right to life and a treaty with the Vatican on conscientious objection would have made access to abortion more difficult. The opposition's latest attempts have been to introduce amendments to the abortion law which while not outrightly banning abortion, create significant barriers for women and adolescents accessing abortion. These anti-choice amendments to the abortion law could have serious repercussions on women’s access to abortion. The Center for Reproductive Rights, Slovakia Pro-Choice, Citizen and Democracy together with other Slovak NGOs prepared letter to Slovak government officials and MPs s asking them not to pass the proposed amendments. Proposals of anti-democratic law amendments in Lithuania. Lithuanian government has proposed to amend the law on protection of children and if passed, it will criminalize public information of any kind on homosexuality or bisexuality. International Convention on the Rights of Child rules that States shall respect rights of a child without discrimination of any kind. Child shall have the right to freedom of expression, which includes freedom to receive information of all kinds. It is peculiar that this law which is meant to protect children actually will diminish their rights , said Michael Cashman, President of the European Parliament's Intergroup on Gay and Lesbian Rights grouping Members of European Parliament and their support staff working on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) equal rights issues. For further information visit the Intergroup’s website: http://www.lgbt-ep.eu New Youth Reproductive Health Information Center in Tbilisi. To achieve wider coverage on youth reproductive health and rights EU/UNFPA co-funded project “Reproductive Health Initiative For Youth in the South Caucasus” (RHIYC) opened Youth Reproductive Health Information Center at Ilia Chavhavadze State University and Youth Reproductive Health Medical-Information Center at “Tbilisi Family Medicine Clinic and Training Center” (TFMCTC). The event was dedicated to International Day of Family. Youth Reproductive Health Information center provides youth with quality information and IEC materials on S&RH and rights issues, as well as gives a possibility of free access to internet resources and friendly environment for discussions related to S&R health and rights. Related Link: http://www.messenger.com.ge/issues/1859_may_21_2009/1859_unfra.html National Parliamentary Forum on Youth Reproductive Health and Rights was held in Baku, Azerbaijan. Parliamentarians, key Government stakeholders and partner NGOs actively participated in the Forum to elaborate follow up plans on the EC/UNFPA funded Reproductive Health Initiative for Youth in the South Caucasus (RHIYC) project in Azerbaijan and to formulate strategies for the sustainable improvement of youth SRHR, including discussions on an ambitious draft law on reproductive health proposed by the Parliamentary group and currently in discussions in
Recommended publications
  • Reproductive Technology in Germany and the United States: an Essay in Comparative Law and Bioethics

    Reproductive Technology in Germany and the United States: an Essay in Comparative Law and Bioethics

    ROBERTSON - REVISED FINAL PRINT VERSION.DOC 12/02/04 6:55 PM Reproductive Technology in Germany and the United States: An Essay in Comparative Law and Bioethics * JOHN A. ROBERTSON The development of assisted reproductive and genetic screening technologies has produced intense ethical, legal, and policy conflicts in many countries. This Article surveys the German and U.S. experience with abortion, assisted reproduction, embryonic stem cell research, therapeutic cloning, and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. This exercise in comparative bioethics shows that although there is a wide degree of overlap in many areas, important policy differences, especially over embryo and fetal status, directly affect infertile and at-risk couples. This Article analyzes those differences and their likely impact on future reception of biotechnological innovation in each country. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................190 I. THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEXT.............................................193 II. GERMAN PROTECTION OF FETUSES AND EMBRYOS ...............195 III. ABORTION .............................................................................196 IV. ASSISTED REPRODUCTION .....................................................202 A. Embryo Protection and IVF Success Rates................204 B. Reducing Multiple Gestations ....................................207 C. Gamete Donors and Surrogates .................................209 V. EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH......................................211
  • A Comparative Analysis of a Pregnant Woman's Rights to Abortion: Notes

    A Comparative Analysis of a Pregnant Woman's Rights to Abortion: Notes

    A Comparative Analysis of a Pregnant Woman’s Rights to Abortion: Notes on Constitutional Courts’ Decisions of Abortion Laws in Germany and the United States, and their Implications for Korean Abortion Laws Sang Kyung Lee Kwangwoon University, Korea Abstract Contrasting the interesting decisions of two highest tribunals in Germany and the United States, this article suggests that two highest courts have dealt with the issue of abortion by applying a similar yardstick, namely, a balancing test. Both courts might have been under influences derived from each other, alluding that a pregnant woman has the right to abortion qua the right to privacy, which comes within the purview of the constitutional provisions, such as, Basic Law Article 2 (1) and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The German Federal Constitutional Court’s decisions and the United States Supreme Court’s decisions are compared in order to find similar constitutional jurisprudence between the two highest tribunals on abortion, rather than the differences. However, the Gonzales v. Carhart case, handed down by the United States Supreme Court in April 18, 2007, which may seriously erode the Roe-Casey line of precedent vis-à-vis a woman’s right to abortion, made the dissenting opinion voiced by Justice Ginsburg that the plurality opinion would chip away the core value of Roe v. Wade persuasive. Therefore, I am tempted to claim that the United States Supreme Court should remain with the distinctive traditions established by Roe and Casey, an effort to protect a pregnant woman’s right to abortion notwithstanding Gonzales v. Carhart, and the Korean Constitutional Court would be better off if it takes into account the converging rationale and yardstick applied to the abortion cases of the two influential highest courts save Gonzales v.
  • No 01 (180) 2019

    No 01 (180) 2019

    CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights No 01 (180) 2019 Table of contents: Burning Issue Regional Updates Resources Upcoming events BURNING ISSUE We won’t keep quiet! Solidarity statement with Slovakia As part of the international campaign of 16 days of activism against violence against women civil society in Slovakia gathered at a protest and march across Bratislava to voice its demands and protest against structural gender based violence, especially any steps limiting access to abortion. The march was called Nebudeme ticho! (We won´t keep quiet!) and was organised by Moznost Volby (ASTRA member organisation), ASPEKT, Bratislava bez náckov and Povstanie pokračuje. In May 2018, the far-right political party in the Parliament proposed an amendment to the abortion law. According to the new law, abortion would be accessible only in three cases: if woman´s life is in danger; if pregnancy was a result of crime and in cases of foetal damage. Only women with Slovak citizenship would be allowed to get abortion in Slovakia under the proposed law. The amendment was supported by the Catholic Church and some conservative politicians. The law did not get a second reading but not because of the content but because of the fascist political party itself. Other parties did not want to be associated with this group. However, as a result of this discussion an agreement among conservative politicians came about – they promised to prepare a new law, the one that would connect politicians in the coalition and opposition in the Parliament. In September, there was another law put forward – the content and consequences would be the same as in the first 1 case, just explanation and language of the law had been changed.
  • Roundtable XX-47

    Roundtable XX-47

    2019 Roundtable Editors: Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins and Diane H-Diplo Labrosse @HDiplo Roundtable and Web Production Editor: George Fujii Roundtable Review Volume XX, No. 47 30 July 2019 Dagmar Herzog. Unlearning Eugenics: Sexuality, Reproduction, and Disability in Post-Nazi Europe. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2018. ISBN: 9780299319205 (cloth, $39.95). URL: https://hdiplo.org/to/RT20-47 Contents Introduction by Lotte Houwink ten Cate, Columbia University ........................................................................ 2 Review by Susanne M. Klausen, Carleton University ............................................................................................ 6 Review by Danilyn Rutherford, The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research .......... 11 Review by Johanna Schoen, Rutgers University .................................................................................................. 15 Review by Katherine Sorrels, University of Cincinnati ....................................................................................... 18 Review by Moira Weigel, Harvard University ........................................................................................................ 22 Author’s Response by Dagmar Herzog, Graduate Center, City University of New York ....................... 26 © 2019 The Authors. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License. 1 | Page H-Diplo Roundtable XX-47 Introduction by Lotte Houwink ten Cate, Columbia University ccording to the historian Dagmar
  • CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights No 10 (189) 2019 BURNING ISSUE

    CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights No 10 (189) 2019 BURNING ISSUE

    CEE Bulletin on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights No 10 (189) 2019 Table of contents: Burning Issue Regional Updates From ASTRA members Resources BURNING ISSUE Slovak abortion law stays intact after an attempt of limiting access to abortion At the end of November, a draft of a bill limiting access to abortion in Slovakia was presented to the Slovak Parliament. The bill, presented to the Parliament by three members of a conservative Slovak National Party was drafted to oblige women and pregnant persons to undergo an ultrasound before terminating a pregnancy. It also banned advertising abortion services and forced doctors to enable the patient to listen to the heartbeat of the embryo or fetus. After a heated discussion in Slovak Parliament, several new amendments were introduced to the document, including: Prolongation of a mandatory waiting period from current 48 hours to 96 hours; The need for informing spouse/a man (the proponents of the draft amendment use: “father of the unborn”) about the existence of pregnancy and her intention to terminate her pregnancy; Reinstating prescriptions for emergency contraception. As a result of the proposal, a protest took place in Bratislava. Those in attendance declared their outrage by an attempt to limit access to abortion and protested against gender-based violence. Slovak Parliament voted on the bill on 5th December, with following results: Present: 124 Number of MPs who voted: 123 In favor: 59 Against: 24 Abstained: 40 Did not vote: 1 Therefore the bill did not pass the voting, although by majority that abstained from the voting rather than voting against proposed change.
  • A Health and Rights Approach to Abortion in Ireland Irish Family Planning Association

    A Health and Rights Approach to Abortion in Ireland Irish Family Planning Association

    Submission to the Citizens’ Assembly A health and rights approach to abortion in Ireland Irish Family Planning Association 16.12.16 Contents IFPA position on the Eighth Amendment .................................................................................... 4 Glossary of terms ............................................................................................................................... 6 About the IFPA .................................................................................................................................. 10 A leading provider of sexual and reproductive health services ...................................... 10 Vision .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Mission ............................................................................................................................................ 10 An advocate for the right to reproductive health ................................................................ 11 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Why does the IFPA believe the Eighth Amendment should be repealed? ............ 12 1.2 Why the IFPA is not in favour of reform that allows abortion only in exceptional cases ..............................................................................................................................................
  • Transnational Constitutionalism and Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments Rosalind Dixon

    Transnational Constitutionalism and Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments Rosalind Dixon

    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers Working Papers 2011 Transnational Constitutionalism and Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments Rosalind Dixon Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ public_law_and_legal_theory Part of the Law Commons Chicago Unbound includes both works in progress and final versions of articles. Please be aware that a more recent version of this article may be available on Chicago Unbound, SSRN or elsewhere. Recommended Citation Rosalind Dixon, "Transnational Constitutionalism and Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments" (University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 349, 2011). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Working Papers at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHICAGO PUBLIC LAW AND LEGAL THEORY WORKING PAPER NO. 349 TRANSNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONALISM AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS Rosalind Dixon THE LAW SCHOOL THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO May 2011 This paper can be downloaded without charge at the Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/publiclaw/index.html and The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. TRANSNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONALISM AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS Rosalind Dixon* Many courts,
  • Constitutionalizing Fetal Rights: a Salutary Tale from Ireland

    Constitutionalizing Fetal Rights: a Salutary Tale from Ireland

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Michigan School of Law Michigan Journal of Gender & Law Volume 22 Issue 2 2015 Constitutionalizing Fetal Rights: A Salutary Tale from Ireland Fiona de Londras Birmingham Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjgl Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Family Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Fiona de Londras, Constitutionalizing Fetal Rights: A Salutary Tale from Ireland, 22 MICH. J. GENDER & L. 243 (2015). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjgl/vol22/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Gender & Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONSTITUTIONALIZING FETAL RIGHTS: A SALUTARY TALE FROM IRELAND iona de ondras In 1983, Ireland became the first country in the world to con- stitutionalize fetal rights. The 8th Amendment to the Constitution, passed by a referendum of the People, resulted in constitutional pro- tection for “the right to life of the unborn,” which was deemed “equal” to the right to life of the “mother.” Since then, enshrining fetal rights in constitutions and in legislation has emerged as a key part of anti-abortion campaigning. This Article traces the constitu- tionalization of fetal rights in Ireland and its implications for law, politics, and women.
  • The Irish Journey – Women's Stories of Abortion

    The Irish Journey – Women's Stories of Abortion

    THE IRISH JOURNEY Women's Stories of Abortion 1 First published in 2000 by the IFPA © IFPA 2000 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or hereafter invented, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except for individual private use or use within Irish public sector educational institutions, without either the prior written permission of the Publishers or a licence permitting restricted copying in Ireland issued by the Irish Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, Irish Writers Centre, 19 Parnell Square, Dublin 1. Copies of this book have been placed with the Legal Deposit Libraries: Trinity College Dublin; The British Library; Oxford University Library; Cambridge University Library; National Library of Scotland; National Library of Wales. ISBN 0-903695-01-4 Artwork: Front Cover and Cycles by Jacqueline Duignan Time by Fiona Godfrey Printed in Ireland Irish Family Planning Association 5/7 Cathal Brugha Street, Dublin 1 Tel: 1850 49 50 51 Charity Number 5694. Registered in Ireland No. 028395 A Company whose Members' Liability is Limited By Guarantee Any net proceeds from the sale of this book will be used for the charitable purposes of the Publisher. 2 DEDICATION This book is dedicated to the women who so bravely contributed their stories of abortion and to all women who experience crisis pregnancy. 3 PREFACE BY SHERIE de BURGH DIRECTOR OF PREGNANCY COUNSELLING, IFPA The women at the support group were helpless with laughter as Jenny told this story. About ten days after her abortion, she was back in Ireland and feeling isolated and lonely.
  • Pathways for Conscience Protection in Law: German, American and Australian Perspectives

    Pathways for Conscience Protection in Law: German, American and Australian Perspectives

    PATHWAYS FOR CONSCIENCE PROTECTION IN LAW: GERMAN, AMERICAN AND AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVES PATRICK T. QUIRK (1696582) A THESIS SUBMITTED IN SATISFACTION OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE SCHOOL OF LAW 2020 To Peter R. Long and Paul F. L. Stenhouse M.S.C. (“Peter & Paul”) STYLE NOTE Each of the individual articles, which comprise part of this thesis, is presented in a distinct style. This is because each article, so far as possible, has been drafted in the house style of the journal in which it has been, or will be, published. Likewise, some variations in spelling and footnoting may occur due to country of publication for each article. TABLE OF CONTENTS Contextual Statement .....................................................................9 Paper One .....................................................................................22 Paper Two ....................................................................................64 Paper Three ................................................................................113 Paper Four ..................................................................................164 Bibliography ............................................................................. 200 ABSTRACT This thesis considers various interactions between law, conscience, and religion in three countries: Germany, the United States, and Australia. Looking in detail at recent controversies, including those over headscarves and crucifixes, and sometimes exploring philosophical
  • Submitted in Part Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Of

    Submitted in Part Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Of

    THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ABORTION LIMITING LEGISLATION IN SOUTH AFRICA by LIZETTE RAU submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF LAWS at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: DR D PRETORIUS NOVEMBER 1996 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ABORTION LIMITING LEGISLATION IN SOUTH AFRICA by L.RAU DEGREE : MAGISTER LEGUM PROMOTOR : DR D PRETORIUS SUMMARY: In terms of the common law abortion was justified in circumstances where the continued pregnancy constituted a threat to the life of the mother. Dissatisfaction with ·the state of the law lead to the promulgation of the Abortion and Sterilization Act, Act 2 of 1975. The Act allows abortion only on restricted grounds and only after strict procedural requirements have been met. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, states that the Constitution is the "supreme law of the Republic". Act 2 of 1975 has to conform to the Constitution in order to be valid. An interpretation of Section 8 (equality); Section 9 (life); Section 10 (human dignity); Section 11 (freedom); Section 13 (privacy) and Section 14 (religion) leads to the conclusion that the present abortion limiting legislation is unconstitutional and would probably be declared invalid if challenged in the Constitutional Court. KEY TERMS: Abortion; Common Law; The Abortion and Sterilization Act: Act 2 of 1975; The Constitution of South Africa: Act 200 of 1993; Equality; Right of Life; Human Dignity; Freedom; Privacy; Religion. INDEX PAGE BIBLIOGRAPHY...................................................................... I TABLE OF CASES.................................................................. IV TABLE OF. STATUTES •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••.• -............... VI A. INTRODUCTION •...•...............•......•......................•.•........ 1 Common Law........................................................................... 2 The Abortion and Sterilization Act, Act 2 of 1975.............................
  • The German Abortion Decisions and the Protective Function in German and Canadian Constitutional Law Vanessa Macdonnell

    The German Abortion Decisions and the Protective Function in German and Canadian Constitutional Law Vanessa Macdonnell

    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Volume 50, Issue 4 (Summer 2013) Article 9 The Voices at Work North American Workshop Guest Editors: Sara Slinn & Eric Tucker The German Abortion Decisions and the Protective Function in German and Canadian Constitutional Law Vanessa MacDonnell Jula Hughes Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Special Issue Article Citation Information MacDonnell, Vanessa and Hughes, Jula. "The German Abortion Decisions and the Protective Function in German and Canadian Constitutional Law." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 50.4 (2013) : 999-1050. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol50/iss4/9 This Special Issue Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. The German Abortion Decisions and the Protective Function in German and Canadian Constitutional Law Abstract In the First and Second Abortion decisions, the German Constitutional Court drew on earlier jurisprudence to hold that the state was under a constitutional duty to protect the fetus from deprivations of its interest in life by the pregnant woman. In this article, we suggest that Canadian constitutional law scholars and reproductive rights advocates would benefit from examining the German abortion decisions despite their highly controversial nature. In our view, the benefits ra e twofold. First, the German cases demonstrate that recognizing the protective function can help clarify constitutional doctrine by revealing the tensions that underlie many difficult constitutional cases. Second, a synthetic reading of the German and Canadian Courts’ abortion jurisprudence generates a more fulsome and nuanced analysis of the issues raised in the those cases, as well as additional critical commentary on the Courts’ analyses and conclusions.