Bosnia and Herzegovina 2025: Scenarios on D.) FUTUREÒ$Evelopmentsiò Òoffersòµveòdifferentòoutlooksòonòwhatò E THEÒCOUNTRYÒCOULDÒLOOKÒLIKEÒINÒTHEÒYEARÒÒ

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bosnia and Herzegovina 2025: Scenarios on D.) FUTUREÒ$Evelopmentsiò Òoffersòµveòdifferentòoutlooksòonòwhatò E THEÒCOUNTRYÒCOULDÒLOOKÒLIKEÒINÒTHEÒYEARÒÒ The publication Bosnia and Herzegovina 2025: Scenarios on d.) FUTUREÒ$EVELOPMENTSiÒ ÒOFFERSÒµVEÒDIFFERENTÒOUTLOOKSÒONÒWHATÒ E THEÒCOUNTRYÒCOULDÒLOOKÒLIKEÒINÒTHEÒYEARÒÒ 4WENTYÒINDIVIDUALSÒFROMÒALLÒWALKSÒOFÒLIFEÒWEREÒWORKINGÒONÒTHEÒ asch ( P BOSNIA AND PROJECTÒTHROUGHOUTÒÒAPPLYINGÒTHEÒMETHODOLOGICALÒFRAMEWORKÒ aul of Shell scenario planning. The participants chose different P train names for each scenario to metaphorically symbolise the HERZEGOVINA 2025: COUNTRIESÒPROGRESSÒTOWARDSÒ%UROPEANÒ)NTEGRATION The goal of this publication is not to provide a blueprint for S SCENARIOS ON FUTURE DECISION MAKERSÒBUTÒTOÒADDÒSOMEÒVALUEÒTOÒTHEÒON GOINGÒDEBATESÒ BYÒPROVIDINGÒANÒUNCONVENTIONALÒLOOKÒONÒPOSSIBLEÒANDÒPLAUSIBLEÒ DEVELOPMENTS developments in the country. ON FUTURE DEVELOPMENT S SCENARIO www.fes.ba BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2025: Paul Pasch (Ed.) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2025: SCENARIOS ON FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Paul Pasch, Editor Sarajevo, 2012 Published by: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Kupreka 20 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina Tel.: +387 (0)33 722-010 E-mail: [email protected] www.fes.ba © Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Responsible: Dr. Paul Pasch Translation: Senada Kreso Proofreading: Gwen Jones Zinaida Lakiæ Illustrations: Mirza IbrahimPasiæ Layout: Filip Andronik Photos: Dr. Paul Pasch CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji Nacionalna i univerzitetska biblioteka Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 316.422:[323:338(497.6)2011/2025(083.92) BOSNIA and Herzegovina 2025: scenarios on future / Paul Pasch, editor ; [translation Senada Kreso ; illustrations Mirza IbrahimsPahiæ]. - Sarajevo : Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2012. - 87 str. : ilustr. ; 24 cm Prijevod djela: Bosna i Hercegovina 2025. - "IBLIOGRAµJAÒSTRÒ ISBN 978-9958-884-11-5 1. Pasch, Paul COBISS.BH-ID 19407622 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2025: Scenarios on future developments Paul Pasch, Editor Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 13 The Scenario Method ...................................................................................... 15 The Need for a Fresh Look ............................................................................... 17 Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 19 SCENARIOS BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2025 ........................................... 23 Dayton Mail - Status quo ................................................................................ 24 Trans BiH Arrow - Functional decentralised state .............................................. 28 BiH Union Express - Functional centralised state ............................................... 34 Western Balkan Inter City - Regional reconnecion ............................................ 40 Tripartite Border Train - Dissolution ................................................................. 46 Background to the Scenarios BiH 2025 .................................................... 53 Political scenario planing: Short Guideline ........................................................ 55 The Pathway towards the Scenarios BiH 2025 .................................................. 62 Participants individual Stories .......................................................................... 65 Some further results of the Working GrouP on Regional Reconnection ............. 78 ANNEX .......................................................................................................... 83 Scenario Planning Team ................................................................................... 85 Bibliography .................................................................................................... 88 5 Foreword The global economic down- of semi-autonomous entities, i.e. the turn has hit Bosnia and Herzegovina Republika Srpska and the Federation of hard. The socio-economic situation is in Bosnia and Herzegovina with its 10 Can- dire straights. Political impasse is preva- TONSÒkÒISÒNOTÒCONDUCIVEÒTOÒTHEÒEFµCIENTÒ lent. The international community is still functioning of state institutions. Back in very much engaged. Much has been and 1995 the Dayton Peace Agreement was still is being Published about the country. a very welcome achievement, but with Still, sometimes we do have mispercep- Bosnia and Herzegovinas ambition to tions regarding Bosnia and Herzegovina. accede to both NATO and the EU, things have changed. The FES project Bosnia and Herze- govina 2025 Scenarios on future Devel- Everyone now seems to be aware OPMENTSiÒ ÒOFFERSÒµVEÒDIFFERENTÒSCENARIOSÒ that Bosnia and Herzegovina is in need on what the country could look like in the of constitutional reform. A better func- year 2025. The scenarios seek to provoke tioning of state level institutions needs the on-going debates by providing an un- to be ensured. In October 2010 general conventional look on the situation. elections took place. For a state that has begun to lag behind the rest of the re- The international community is com- gion, that should have been Perceived as mitted to helP Bosnia and Herzegovina a starting Point to move forward from overcome the shadows of its traumatic the Political deadlock. However, it took Past, assist it on its way to transatlantic the leaders of the six main political par- and EuroPean integration, and to help ties 15 months of brinkmanshiP to come the country regain its status as a modern to a watered down compromise that al- and functional European country. lowed for a PrinciPal agreement on the formation of the Council of Ministers. The current Constitution being one of the annexes of the Dayton Peace Thus there is a Pressing need for the Agreement with its comPlex structure new administration to take some clear 7 decisions with regard to the future of scenario planning exercise could contrib- THEÒ /FµCEÒ OFÒ THEÒ (IGHÒ 2EPRESENTATIVEÒ ute to the Process in a constructive way. (OHR), Brcko District, comPliance with We hoPe that, by Presenting Politicians the Stabilisation and Association Agree- and Policy makers Possible and Plausible ment, NATO membershiP and EU acces- scenarios of what Bosnia and Herzegov- sion candidate status. ina could look like in 2025, we may pro- vide them with food for thought. By be- The international community is ing confronted with Possible scenarios more and more convinced that the driv- that might be in line with their visions of ing force behind these changes should the future of their country, or which they come from the PeoPle and their leaders. would like to prevent by all means, pol- The reform process should be undertak- icy makers and politicians might imple- en with a continuous step-by-step ap- ment their Political strategies with more proach. The harmonisation of the Con- determination. stitution with the European Convention on Human Rights, the adaPtion of state It is obvious that local ownershiP is AIDÒLEGISLATION ÒASÒWELLÒASÒµNDINGÒAÒCOM- the only way to guarantee the outcome PROMISEÒONÒTHEÒCENSUSÒLAW ÒAREÒTHEÒµRSTÒ of the necessary reforms. However, ac- steps that need to be taken. Further- cording to the actual scenarios, the in- more, the rule of law and the PrinciPle of ternational community still has some ob- legal certainty should be resPected. But LIGATIONSÒTOÒFULµLÒTOÒASSISTÒINÒTHEÒEFFORTSÒ above all a Paradigm shift needs to take to overcome the dysfunctional Dayton Place so that reconciliation amongst the structure. That is why Bosnia and Her- people can yield fruit. zegovina needs to be Pushed to make progress towards reforms. Constitutional reform must be well prepared and agreed with local politi- The scenarios do not give a bluePrint cians in order to be able to form a coali- for decision-makers how to act but they tion Government. A solution to the con- give a message, from which the recipi- ¹ICTINGÒCONCEPTSÒOFÒConfederation versus ents can draw their conclusions. The Federal State must be found. Overall the Present Publication intends to add some required reforms should be Perceived as value to a controversial Public debate a win-win situation for everyone. This of that will hopefully contribute to over- course is easier said than done. coming the stalemate. The PeoPle of Bosnia and Herzegovina, like all PeoPle This political deadlock was the star- of the Western Balkans, deserve to have INGÒPOINTÒWHENÒWEÒµRSTÒCONSIDEREDÒIFÒAÒ 8 a Peaceful, ProsPerous and socially just determined to make this project a suc- perspective within the European family. cess. I would esPecially like to thank Winfried Veit, Merima Alic, Mia Karame- This Publication Project was made hic and Tanja ToPic for their dedicated Possible through the joint efforts of a work throughout the year-long exercise. very committed scenario team consist- It is their coordinating role, research, ing of 20 PeoPle from all walks of life of writing and technical editing that made Bosnian and Herzegovinian society, to- this project possible. I am also grateful gether with the FES coordination team. to Mirza Ibrahimpasic and Filip Andronik All team members ParticiPated in the for their invaluable work in illustrating scenario building in a Personal caPacity. and designing this publication. The scenarios are necessarily a compro- MISE Ò RE¹ECTINGÒ CONSENSUSÒ AMONGÒ THEÒ This publication remains the sole re- whole scenario team. I wish to acknowl- sponsibility of the editor. edge my aPPreciation to all the team members who were, over the year,
Recommended publications
  • Kazakhstan ©Who
    WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION in KAZAKHSTAN ©WHO Welcome from the Who we are Regional Director The World Health Organization (WHO) is the global authority on public health within the United Nations. Welcome to WHO. Health is our most Founded in 1948, we collaborate with the governments precious asset. WHO’s goal is to ensure of 194 Member States to ensure the highest attainable better health for everyone, everywhere. level of health for all. Currently, more than 7000 people We touch people’s lives – making sure work in 150 country offices, 6 regional offices and at the the air we breathe, and the food and headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. The Organization’s water we consume is safe; ensuring work is guided by the principle that health is a human right, all have access to effective health and we seek to extend universal health coverage, protect systems; safeguarding the quality of people from health emergencies, and ensure that all medicines and vaccines; combatting people enjoy better health and well-being. diseases and protecting people from health threats. WHO works Kazakhstan is part of the WHO European Region, which with governments, organizations, comprises 53 countries: this Region covers a vast communities and individuals to promote geographical area reaching from the Atlantic to the Pacific health throughout our lives. We all oceans. WHO staff in the Region are public health, scientific benefit socially, economically and and technical experts, based in the Regional Office in environmentally from a world that Copenhagen, Denmark, in five technical centres and seeks health for all and nowhere is our in country offices in 30 Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • Sdgs and the UK Higher Education Sector
    The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals and the UK Higher Education Sector An overview of the UK HE sector's contribution to the SDGs Acknowledgements This work was produced by Sonya Peres for EAUC-Scotland. This work has been made possible through funding and support from the University of Edinburgh and the University of Strathclyde Contents What is the Sustainable Development Solutions Network? 1 Purpose of the Report 1 What is the SDSN Guide? 1 The SDSN Guide and the UK 4 Learning and Teaching 5 Global Goals Teach In 5 Vertically Integrated Projects for Sustainable Development 5 (VIP4SD) at the University of Strathclyde Research 6 SDG Analysis: Bibliometrics of Relevance by Aurora Network 6 Institute for Sustainable Future at Keele University 7 Organisational Governance, Culture and Operations of 8 the University The University of Manchester: Sustainable Development Goals 8 Impacting the Global Goals by DEGREEs by the University of 9 Leicester External Leadership 10 On Target for 2030? - University of the West of Scotland and Oxfam 10 Bristol and the SDGs: A Voluntary Local Review of Progress 2019 11 Please note that resources and sources are embedded in this document- simply hover your mouse pointer over a blue word. What is the Sustainable Development Solutions Network? The U N S u s t a i n a b l e D e v e l o p m e n t S o l u t i o n s N e t w o r k produces and promotes practical guidance on and solutions to sustainable development, including realising t h e S u s t a in a b l e D e v e l o p m e n t G o a l s (SDGs).
    [Show full text]
  • Reunifying Mostar: Opportunities for Progress
    REUNIFYING MOSTAR: OPPORTUNITIES FOR PROGRESS 19 April 2000 ICG Balkans Report N° 90 Sarajevo/Washington/Brussels, 19 April 2000 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................i I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................1 A. HDZ Obstruction...................................................................................................2 B. International Community Disarray..........................................................................3 II. BROKEN PROMISES: 1994-1999 .........................................................................4 A. The 1994 Geneva MOU .........................................................................................4 B. Towards Ethnic Apartheid......................................................................................4 C. EU Aid Reinforces Ethnic Apartheid ........................................................................6 D. Madrid and Dayton: defining the local administration of Mostar ................................7 E. Koschnick’s Decree and the Rome Agreement: EU Caves in to the HDZ.....................9 F. Mostar’s First Elections and the Myth of the Interim Statute ...................................12 G. The Liska Street Incident and Unified Police..........................................................18 H. No Progress, New Elections .................................................................................24 I. No progress,
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaculture Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    27 Aquaculture development in Bosnia and Herzegovina Jasmin Omeragić Veterinary Faculty Veterinary Faculty of the University of Sarajevo Zmaja od Bosne 90, 71000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina [email protected] Omeragić, J. 2009. Aquaculture development in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In M.G. Bondad-Reantaso, J.R. Arthur and R.P. Subasinghe (eds). Strengthening aquaculture health management in Bosnia and Herzegovina. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 524. Rome, FAO. pp 27–33. ABSTRACT Bosnia and Herzegovina has a very long and rich tradition in aquaculture. Important advantages that the country possesses for the development of aquaculture include abundant clean water, high-quality, educated and cheap labour, high capability of fish processing factories, and the high quality of its hatcheries. Thanks to these and other factors, Bosnia and Herzegovina has a great potential for increasing national aquaculture production. During the war period of 1991–1995, the majority of the fish farms were destroyed along with their entire infrastructure. After the war, the process of privatization started, leading to an increase in fish production. The privatization of the fish farms, which since 1995 were in the possession of the State, has broadened the possibilities for aquaculture development in the country, including the use of new technologies, the expansion of capacity and the production of high-quality feeds. The export of fish and fish products from Bosnia and Herzegovina to European Union markets as officially permitted by EU Decision 2008/156/EC is the most important success of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s agriculture sector in the post-war period. INTRODUCTION Bosnia and Herzegovina is located in the Western Balkans region and has a total surface area of 51 209.2 km2, of which land accounts for 51 197 km2 and sea accounts for 12.2 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
    [Show full text]
  • S E R B I a Knin ˆ Bor
    CENTRAL BALKAN REGION 16 18 20 22 Nagykanizsa Tisza Hódmezövásárhely Dravaˆ Kaposvár Szekszárd SLOVENIA P Celje Varazdin A Szeged N H U N G A R Y N Arad O N Pécs 46 I 46 A Danube Subotica Mures N Bjelovar B A Zagreb S Kikinda Deva I Tisa N Sombor Timisoara¸ Hunedoara T N A Karlovac B A R O M A N I A Sisak C R O A T I A Osijek Vojvodina Petroseni Sava Vukovar Zrenjanin S Resita¸ ¸ LP Novi Sad A ˆ N IA Slavonski Brod Federation of Bosnia Vrsac N and Herzegovina Danube A Tirgu-Jiu V Prijedor Ruma L ˆ ˆ ˆ Y S Bihac Republika Srpska Brcko Pancevo N A D Banja Luka Doboj Sava R Drobeta-Turnu Bijeljina Sabac Belgrade Danube T Severin Udbina I Smederevo Kljuc Tuzla N B O S N I A A A N D Valjevo Danube Zenica Drina R S e r b i a Knin ˆ Bor 44 H E R Z E G O V I N A Srebrenica Kragujevac 44 Glamoc I ˆ Vidin Calafat C Sarajevo Uzice Paracin´ Šibenik Pale Kraljevo Federation of Bosnia ˆ Morava D and Herzegovina Gorazde Split A ˆ L A M Foca Montana A T L Nis´ B I Republika A Mostar L A Priboj K P Srpska A ˆ Ta ra Novi Pazar N M Ploce S Bijelo TS. Piva Polje Neum Kosovska Mitrovica Berane Montenegro BULG. Nikšic´ Pec´ Priština Dubrovnik Kosovo Vranje Pernik CROATIA Podgorica Dakovica Gnjilane NORTH (Djakovica) Uroševac Kotor ALBANIAN Kyustendil ALPS Prizren A Lake I N Kumanovo Scutari N Kukës A 42 Shkodër L Tetovo Skopje 42 Bar P R A S Gostivar Štip Shëngjin Titov Veles A d r i a t i c Peshkopi THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Vardar Strumica Barletta S e a Tirana Prilep Lake Durrës Ohrid I T A L Y Bari Elbasan Ohrid Bitola Republic boundary
    [Show full text]
  • Download EDVACAY Annual Report 2018
    Encouraging Democratic Values and Active Citizenship among Youth 2017/18 This project is generously supported by the National Endowment for Democracy and the University of Sarajevo School of Economics and Business. >> PROJECT SUMMARY >> The year-long program seeks to train 15 aspiring young activists, introducing them to democracy and human rights issues, encouraging them to employ critical thinking on sensitive topics and building their communications, presentation, and research skills. The program includes a nine-day education and skills development training with a debate workshop, individual research assignments on democracy-related issues, a group project resulting in four civic campaigns, a three-month period for the promotion of the results of the implemented civic campaigns and a closing ceremony with a final debate tournament. >> Participants The Call for Applications was open from October 16 until November 5, 2017. Besides daily promotion on the Humanity in Action Bosnia and Herzegovina and EDVACAY Facebook pages, the news about the Call for Applications was published on several student and NGO web portals, such as Studomat, Hocu.ba, Mreza Mira, and the Civil Society Promotion Center, as well as on official university websites such as University of Banja Luka Academy of Arts, University of Mostar Faculty of Law, University of Sarajevo Academy of Music, and University of Sarajevo Faculty of Law. The program was extensively promoted at the Eighth University of Sarajevo Scholarship Fair, held at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering on October 19, 2017. The program was also promoted through Humanity in Action Senior Fellow Network, EDVACAY Alumni Network, and other guest promotions at various NGOs in Sarajevo and Banja Luka.
    [Show full text]
  • Depleted Uranium in Bosnia and Herzegovina Revised Edition: May 2003
    First published in Switzerland in 2003 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2003, United Nations Environment Programme. ISBN 92-1-158619-4 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme PO Box 30552 This report by the United Nations Environment Programme was made possible Nairobi by the generous contributions of the Governments of Italy and Switzerland. Kenya Tel: +254 2 621234 Fax: +254 2 624489/90 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org Further information DISCLAIMER Copies of this report may be ordered from: This revised edition includes three chapters translated into the local language. SMI (Distribution Services) Limited The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The P. O . B o x 1 1 9 designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the Stevenage part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or Hertfordshire SG1 4TP, UK its authority, or concerning the
    [Show full text]
  • BEYOND the WALL Twenty Years of Europeanisation As Seen from the Former Yugoslavia
    BEYOND THE WALL Twenty years of Europeanisation as seen from the former Yugoslavia Conference organized by Notre Europe and Kulturni Front Belgrade, 13-16 December 2009 Programme Strasbourg, 2009 © Martin Kollár OPENING CULTURAL EVENING Venue: European Centre for Culture and Debate GRAD, Braće Krsmanović 4 Sunday, 13 December 6.30pm: Opening of the photo exhibition “The European Parliament – Future archive” by Martin Kollár, Slovak photographer 8.30pm: Film: Snijeg (Snow) followed by discussion with lead actress Zana Marjanović Moderator: Milan Rakita Strasbourg, 2007 © Martin Kollár CONFERENCE Venue: Palace Serbia, Mihajlo Pupin Boulevard Monday, 14 December 9.30am: Welcome of guests: Joachim Bitterlich (Vice-President, Notre Europe) Aziliz Gouez (Researcher, Notre Europe); Dejan Ubović (Director, Kulturni Front) 10.00am: Introduction Božidar Đelić (Serbian Deputy Prime Minister for European Integration) 10.30am: Keynote speeches Ivan Vujačić (former Serbian Ambassador to the United States of America) Jacques Rupnik (Professor, Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Internationales, Paris) 11.30am: State and states of the former Yugoslavia: a political overview Pierre Mirel (Director, DG Enlargement, European Commission) 12.00pm – 1.30pm: LUNCH BREAK SESSION 1: “MY SAFE EUROPEAN HOME” 1.30pm – 4pm: From Marxism to Marks & Spencer’s: promises of prosperity in a re-formed Europe Introduction and chair: Chris Hann (Director, Max Planck Institute, Halle/Saale) Tristes socialismes – et plus tristes encore post-socialismes ? [Lecture in English]
    [Show full text]
  • North Macedonia: 'New' Country Facing Old Problems
    North Macedonia: ‘New’ country facing old problems A research on the name change of the Republic of North Macedonia Willem Posthumus – s4606027 Master Thesis Human Geography - Conflicts, Territories and Identities Nijmegen School of Management Radboud University Nijmegen Supervisor Henk van Houtum October 2019 36.989 words Once, from eastern ocean to western ocean, the land stretched away without names. Nameless headlands split the surf; nameless lakes reflected nameless mountains; and nameless rivers flowed through nameless valleys into nameless bays. G. R. Stewart, 1945, p. 3 2 I Preface After a bit more than a year, I can hereby present my master’s thesis. It’s about a name. Around 100 pages about a name: I could not have thought it would be such an extensive topic. Last year I had heard about Macedonia, or the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, as it was often called. I didn’t know it that well, just that it used to be part of Yugoslavia, obviously. An item in the news, however, triggered my interest: the country was about to change its name to North Macedonia. ‘Why?’ I thought. I didn’t know about the name dispute, but the more I read about it, the more I wanted to know. When I had to choose a subject for my master’s thesis, I knew I would look at this name change. A year later, I think I understand the name change and the dispute better. Still, the topic is more complicated than I thought. Understanding everything there is about it would probably take a lot more time.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction “As I have said time and again, my job is to get rid of my job. I am quite clear that the OHR is now into the terminal phase of its mandate”, said then High Representative for the international community in BIH Paddy Ashdown in his speech in front of the Venice Commission1 in October 2004. For over eight years now the international community has been discussing the downscale of its presence in Bosnia and Herzegovina2, which since the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement in 1995 has been run as a virtual protectorate. But not much has changed since Ashdown’s speech. Although the country has gone forward in all fields and the security situation has improved drastically since 1995, with the number of NATO peacekeeping forces decreasing from 60,000 to only 1,6003 and with BIH currently a temporary member of the UN Security Council, no arrangements have been made to grant more sovereignty to local politics. And due to recent negative developments in politics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the prospect of getting rid of the ‘informal trusteeship’ now seems more distant than it was at the time of Ashdown’s speech. The OHR, acronym for Office of the High Representative, is the international body responsible for overseeing the implementation of the civilian aspects of the treaty which ended the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is governed by a council of 55 countries and international organizations charged with overseeing Bosnia’s reconstruction, formally organized into an umbrella organization called the Peace Implementation Council (PIC). It is the PIC who 1The European Commission for Democracy through Law, better known as the Venice Commission, is the Council of Europe's advisory body on constitutional matters.
    [Show full text]
  • National ERA Roadmap of the Czech Republic for the Years 2016-2020
    National ERA Roadmap of the Czech Republic for the years 2016-2020 INTRODUCTION The Czech Republic contributes to the advancement of European Research Area (hereinafter referred to as “ERA”) from the very beginning of creation of this concept in 2000 by both its national policies as well as by engagement in international cooperation in R&D and innovation. ERA cannot exist without pro-active participation of individual Member States neither without support and coordination provided by the European Commission. Since the well-functioning ERA – contributing by means of R&D and innovation to address grand societal challenges and economic needs – is a fundamental precondition for an overall improvement of the quality of life of European citizens, further development of the ERA is our common goal and the Czech Republic is fully prepared to be an active player in pursuing these tasks. The visibility and importance of ERA – granted by the reference to completion of ERA in 2014 and by confirmation of ERA as one of the cornerstones of the Europe 2020 strategy Innovation Union Flagship – gave a new impetus and momentum to a more targeted debate on the role, functioning and governance of ERA in the following years. Recognition of significance of the advancement of ERA and the need of coherent and well targeted cooperation between the European Commission and Member States triggered an intensive discussion on these topics both in the ERAC (European Research Area and Innovation Committee) and Council´s Research Working Group, which resulted in the adoption of “ERA Roadmap for the years 2015-2020”. The Czech Republic is of the opinion that the individual priority axes of the ERA Roadmap are well selected and defined and respond to areas, which require targeted focus for the further advancement of ERA.
    [Show full text]