Impact of Subprime Crises on Indian Banking Sector

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Impact of Subprime Crises on Indian Banking Sector IMPACT OF SUBPRIME CRISES ON INDIAN BANKING SECTOR By Dr. SANJAY SRIVASTAVA Director, Ansal Technical Campus, Lucknow. 2015 International E - Publication www.isca.me , www.isca.co.in International E - Publication 427, Palhar Nagar, RAPTC, VIP-Road, Indore-452005 (MP) INDIA Phone: +91-731-2616100, Mobile: +91-80570-83382 E-mail: [email protected] , Website: www.isca.me , www.isca.co.in © Copyright Reserved 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, reordering or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN: 978-93-84648-99-2 PREFACE The banking industry in India seems to be impervious to the global slowdown in the economy. This slowdown originated from United States in the last quarter of 2008. The astonishing fact came to surface that banks in India were least affected by the financial turbulence emanating from the West and seemed to be well supported by strong fundamental base. The Indian banking industry emerged well placed as compared to it’s western counterparts which are vying for government bailout and stimulus package. This research work characterized the study of insulation of Indian Banks to global financial crisis and means to augment the growth rate. Although , United States is the fastest growing country with highest stability , however currency exchange has suddenly started devaluating even in the home country as well as in the international market. This has initiated the economic crisis in the world market. Though the surface causes of it were known but it was required to explore in depth the causes of this decline. It was imperative to ascertain as to why Indian economy as a whole did not get much impact of it and at the same time find out new methods to be exercised in terms of regulation of Indian financial system so that Indian economy keeps growing with much faster rate. At the top are concerns of a direct impact on financial institutions in India. The Reserve Bank of India has clarified that the exposure of Indian banks and institution to the crisis is marginal. State bank of India, ICICI Bank, Bank of Baroda and Bank of India are set to bookmark market losses on their foreign offices to credit derivatives. The estimated total of these losses is around US$ 3 billion for the four banks put together and the provisioning made by these banks so far has been quite small. Given the size of the banks and their balance sheets, even if these figures were accurate, there would be little impact on the overall performance of the banks. In short the direct fallout effect of the collapse of the Subprime mortgages to institutions in India is likely to be quite insignificant. Public sector banks have been very proactive in there restructuring initiatives, be it in technology implementation or pruning their loss assets. While the likes of SBI have already made attempts towards consolidation, others are keen to take that direction. Incremental provisioning made for asset slippages have safe guarded the banks from witnessing a sudden impact on their bottom lines. Retail lending (especially mortgage financing) that formed a significant portion of the portfolios for most banks in the last two years lost some weightage on the banks portfolios due to the inherent risk. However, on the liabilities side, with better penetration in the semi urban and rural areas, the banks garnered a higher proportion of low cost deposits thereby economizing on the cost of funds. Apart from streamlining their processes through technology initiatives such as ATMs, telephone banking, online banking and web based product, banks also restored to cross selling of financial products such as credit cards, mutual funds and insurance policies to augment their fee based income. The strong economic growth in the past, low defaulter ratio, absence of complex financial products, regular intervention by central banks, adjustment of monetary policy coupled with close banking culture has turned the tables in favor of Indian banking industry. Thus this research has been carried out to ascertain the reason behind the sustainability of the Indian banking sector in global financial turmoil. Further a rigorous comparison between the Indian nationalized banks and the private multinational banks has been done. The rate of growth of Indian banking sector has been analyzed along with means to augment it. In order to sustain the growth of Indian banking in future certain methods have been suggested. It is an exploratory research and the basic aim of research is to gain familiarity with the Indian banking sector and to achieve new insight. So the study has tried to understand the feasibility of regulations imposed by RBI. Research work has been based on secondary data which was collected from text books, journals, newspapers, articles and web material. Summary reports of Indian Govt. and World bank were referred to. The data collection was carried out by means of Interview method and Questionnaire. This was done on the basis of personal interviews information in research work. The work embodied in the book entitled STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF TRANSITION METAL COMPLEXES OF SUBSTITUTED OXAZOLE AND THIAZOLE was carried out by Dr. SANJAY SRIVASTAVA for the Ph.D. in COMMERCE from DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, UNIVERSITY OF LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW (INDIA) under the esteemed supervision of PROF ARVIND KUMAR in the year 2012. *** iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The preparation and presentation of a research work is always a testing time for the researcher. During the course of research, I came across many problems. Like many others, it was not an easy task for me to complete the work without experience of facing constraints of time, resources and others. However, with the active help, proper guidance and support of my supervisor Dr. Arvind Kumar and my closed ones, this work could be accomplished. No mission of academic excellence can be achieved without the active help and guidance from the supervisor. I am obliged and highly indebted to my supervisor Dr. Arvind Kumar, Professor and Head, Department of Commerce, University of Lucknow, for the wholehearted cooperation and support he has extended for the achievement of my mission. Under the unique approach for his guidance, I have acquired the requisite knowledge in accomplishing the mission. In spite of his hectic schedule, he always had time for many discussions that were needed. Without his moral and intellectual support, this work could not have been completed. I, also take this opportunity to acknowledge my profound gratitude to every person who made this thesis possible for submission. I am grateful for the blessings of Almighty, my parents & my family who made me what I am today. I am extremely grateful to Prof. A. Chatterjee, Dean, Faculty of Commerce, Lucknow University, Lucknow who very kindly allowed me to peruse my studies in the department and has always been available to encourage me in my pursuit. I shall fail in my duties if I do not acknowledge the unstinting blessing, support, cooperation and guidance that I have received from all faculty members of the Department of Commerce, University of Lucknow, Lucknow. I owe a special thanks to Mrs. Rekha Agarwal, Librarian, Central Library, BBDGEI, Lucknow for her wholehearted support and cooperation in obtaining access to valuable materials. I am also thankful to Mr. Girish Srivastava for lending hand in completing my research work. I thank all those persons whose names could not be included in the acknowledgement. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary deserves special thanks for typing out the manuscript of this thesis. Last but not least, I remember Late. Babu Banarasi Das Gupta, Ex Chief Minister, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh and a Great Freedom Fighter for his vision. ”To provide an open opportunity to the young generation for evolving their core competencies and to build their career as world class professional with broad based foundation, in-depth knowledge & versatile personality to meet the challenge of Global Economy”. (Sanjay Srivastava) iv CONTENT Nomenclature Page No. 1. Chapter -1 Introduction 11 2. Chapter -2 Causes & effects of subprime mortgage crisis 27 3. Chapter -3 Historical Evaluation of Indian Banking System 38 4. Chapter -4 Performance of Indian banking sector’s in the post - 79 liberalization period with new approaches 5. Chapter -5 Banking Sector Impact of Sub Prime Crisis on 99 during 2005-08 6. Chapter -6 Findings, Conclusion, Suggestions 107 7. Bibliography v SUMMARY Chapter-1 begins with defining the subprime used in the lending industry to define a borrower who does not have a good credit history and hence is not able to qualify for best market rates vis-à-vis the prime category borrower. The term "subprime" reflects not the lending rate but the borrower's credit status. Potential sub- prime borrowers may comprise of financially troubled people, meaning thereby that the sub-prime lenders take a higher degree of risk. Hence to offset the risk to an extent the lenders increase the interest rates. Sub-prime lending may be utilized for sub-prime mortgages, sub-prime car loans, sub-prime credit cards etc. Subprime mortgages totaled $600 billion in 2006, accounting for about one-fifth of the US home loan market. The subprime mortgage crisis is a commonly used term to describe the international financial crisis that was initiated by problems in the U.S. mortgage market in early 2007. It all started in 2006 with US Market tumbling down due to defaults by the subprime borrowers. The doubled edged sword, increase in interest rates and simultaneously fall in property prices, hit the market leading to subprime mortgage crisis. Between the years 2000-2005, along with very low interest rates, property prices were also on a rising trend and the subprime borrowers were able to meet their obligations as they were building equity by selling the properties or getting the properties refinanced.
Recommended publications
  • (CASE NO. 12-12019) 12-12020-Mg Doc 548 Filed 06
    12-12020-mg Doc 548 Filed 06/30/12 Entered 06/30/12 18:13:30 Main Document Pg 1 of 241 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 : RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al., 1 : Case No. 12-12020 (MG) : : : (Jointly Administered) Debtors. : ---------------------------------------------------------------x SCHEDULES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FOR RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC (CASE NO. 12-12019) 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: Residential Capital, LLC (0738); ditech, LLC (7228); DOA Holding Properties, LLC (4257); DOA Properties IX (Lots-Other), LLC (3274), EPRE LLC (7974); Equity Investment I, LLC (2797); ETS of Virginia, Inc. (1445); ETS of Washington, Inc. (0665); Executive Trustee Services, LLC (8943); GMAC Model Home Finance I, LLC (8469); GMAC Mortgage USA Corporation (6930); GMAC Mortgage, LLC (4840); GMAC Residential Holding Company, LLC (2190); GMAC RH Settlement Services, LLC (6156); GMACM Borrower LLC (4887); GMACM REO LLC (2043); GMACR Mortgage Products, LLC (6369); GMAC-RFC Holding Company, LLC (3763); HFN REO Sub II, LLC (N/A); Home Connects Lending Services, LLC (9412); Homecomings Financial Real Estate Holdings, LLC (6869); Homecomings Financial, LLC (9458); Ladue Associates, Inc. (3048); Passive Asset Transactions, LLC (4130); PATI A, LLC (2729); PATI B, LLC (2937); PATI Real Estate Holdings, LLC (5201); RAHI A, LLC (3321); RAHI
    [Show full text]
  • March 29, 2011 at 9:45 Am (Eastern Time)
    HEARING DATE AND TIME: March 29, 2011 at 9:45 a.m. (Eastern time) OBJECTION DEADLINE: March 22, 2011 at 4:00 p.m.. (Eastern time) John Lewis Mealer, pro per (pro se) 6333 Gardenia Lane Show Low, Arizona 85901 [email protected], 928-532-8191 CREDITOR/CLAIMANT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, et al., ) Chapter 11 Case No. ) f/k/a General Motors Corp., et al. ) 09-50026 (REG) ) Debtor ) Jointly Administered ) ) ) ) ) (Creditor's Principal Brief) ) CREDITOR'S RESPONSE, OBJECTION and MOTION TO DENY THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN DEBTOR'S OBJECTION, DISAGREEMENT and MOTION TO DENY ENTRY OF ORDER DISALLOWING and EXPUNGING ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM NO. 70792 FILED BY JOHN L MEALER Creditor/Claimant/Plaintiff Mealer's Response, Disagreement, Objection and Motion is based on the attached Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed and timely served concurrently all pleadings and papers on file herein and such pleadings as filed in the Arizona District Court Case No: 3:10-cv-08172-JWS, which is integral to this complaint and attached hereto as Exhibits, and upon such oral and documentary evidence as may be presented at a hearing if necessary on this [responsive] principal brief Motion To Deny the Relief Requested in Debtor's Objection and Motion To Deny Entry of Order Disallowing and Expunging Administrative Claim No. 70792 Filed By John L Mealer.. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Relief Requested........................................................................................................... 2 II. Jurisdiction …............................................................................................................... 5 III. Preliminary Statement (Background of Mealer's Claims)............................................ 6 IV. Debtor's liability is clear and concise............................................................................. 7 V. Internet Postings (Doctrine of Accord and Satisfaction Improperly Applied).................9 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles in Defense of Private-Label
    ARTICLES IN DEFENSE OF PRIVATE-LABEL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES Brent J. Horton * I. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................828 II. MORTGAGE SECURITIZATION ....................................................835 A. Types of Private-Label MBS ...............................................835 B. Are Private-Label MBS Really Securities? .........................838 C. Why Securitize Mortgages?.................................................842 III. THE DEVELOPMENT OF GSE MBS ...........................................843 IV. THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE -LABEL MBS .........................846 A. Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984 ..........................................................................848 1. Allowing Forward Trading of Private-Label MBS...............................................................................849 2. Exempting Private-Label MBS from State Blue Sky Laws...............................................................853 3. Allowing National Banks to Invest in Private-Label MBS...............................................................................854 B. Rule 415 Shelf Registration .................................................856 C. REMIC Provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 .............857 V. GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE WITH PRIVATE -LABEL MBS.....859 A. GSEs Relegate Private-Label MBS Issuers to Securitizing Risky Mortgages ..............................................859 1. Payment-to-Income and Loan-to-Value Ratios .............861
    [Show full text]
  • Q1 2008 GMAC LLC Earnings Conference Call on Apr. 29. 2008
    FINAL TRANSCRIPT GMAC - Q1 2008 GMAC LLC Earnings Conference Call Event Date/Time: Apr. 29. 2008 / 9:00AM ET www.streetevents.com Contact Us © 2008 Thomson Financial. Republished with permission. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of Thomson Financial. FINAL TRANSCRIPT Apr. 29. 2008 / 9:00AM, GMAC - Q1 2008 GMAC LLC Earnings Conference Call CORPORATE PARTICIPANTS Susan Shank GMAC LLC - Director, IR Rob Hull GMAC LLC - CFO Jim Jones GMAC LLC - EVP, CEO, ResCap Bill Muir GMAC LLC - President Sam Ramsey GMAC LLC - CRO CONFERENCE CALL PARTICIPANTS Douglas Carson Banc of America Securities - Analyst James Leda Merrill Lynch - Analyst Mark Alter Credit Suisse - Analyst Monica Keany Morgan Stanley - Analyst Angelo Graci Merrill Lynch - Analyst Ryan O©Connell Citigroup - Analyst Barry Groveman Deutsche Bank - Analyst Peter Plott Imperial Capital - Analyst Brian Johnson Lehman Brothers - Analyst David Andrews PIMCO Equity Advisors - Analyst Adam Sklarr Monarch - Analyst Cyril Battini Credit Suisse - Analyst Ruben Cuthberg Redwood Capital Management - Analyst Eric Selle JPMorgan - Analyst Alexis Renault WestLB - Analyst www.streetevents.com Contact Us 1 © 2008 Thomson Financial. Republished with permission. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of Thomson Financial. FINAL TRANSCRIPT Apr. 29. 2008 / 9:00AM, GMAC - Q1 2008 GMAC LLC Earnings Conference Call Louise Pitt Goldman Sachs - Analyst David Knutson LGMA - Analyst Dave Miller Elliott Associates - Analyst PRESENTATION Operator Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the First Quarter 2008 GMAC Earnings Conference Call.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Financial Affairs for Homecomings Financial, Llc (Case No
    12-12020-mg Doc 636 Filed 06/30/12 Entered 06/30/12 19:43:20 Main Document Pg 1 of 71 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 : RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al., 1 : Case No. 12-12020 (MG) : : : (Jointly Administered) Debtors. : ---------------------------------------------------------------x STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL AFFAIRS FOR HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC (CASE NO. 12-12042) 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: Residential Capital, LLC (0738); ditech, LLC (7228); DOA Holding Properties, LLC (4257); DOA Properties IX (Lots-Other), LLC (3274), EPRE LLC (7974); Equity Investment I, LLC (2797); ETS of Virginia, Inc. (1445); ETS of Washington, Inc. (0665); Executive Trustee Services, LLC (8943); GMAC Model Home Finance I, LLC (8469); GMAC Mortgage USA Corporation (6930); GMAC Mortgage, LLC (4840); GMAC Residential Holding Company, LLC (2190); GMAC RH Settlement Services, LLC (6156); GMACM Borrower LLC (4887); GMACM REO LLC (2043); GMACR Mortgage Products, LLC (6369); GMAC-RFC Holding Company, LLC (3763); HFN REO Sub II, LLC (N/A); Home Connects Lending Services, LLC (9412); Homecomings Financial Real Estate Holdings, LLC (6869); Homecomings Financial, LLC (9458); Ladue Associates, Inc. (3048); Passive Asset Transactions, LLC (4130); PATI A, LLC (2729); PATI B, LLC (2937); PATI Real Estate Holdings, LLC (5201); RAHI A, LLC (3321); RAHI B, LLC (3553);
    [Show full text]
  • 108528831.Pdf
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION Denise Subramaniam, pro se Civil Case No. ____________ “ex rel.” on behalf of the Unites States (to be assigned by Clerk of the Court) (Enter Full name of plaintiff(s)) Plaintiff(s), COMPLAINT Jury Trial Demanded X v. Yes No D. Andrew Beal, Jacob Cherner, Molly Curl, MGC Mortgage, LVN Corporation, William Mynatt, David Allison, Ian Benedict, Mary Przybyla, Dovenmuehle Mortgage Inc., Beal Bank, Beal FInancial, et al; Ally Financial et al, Bruce Pardis, Tom Donatacci, Michael Carpenter, Mark F. Bole, Masse Adjety, Rosalyn Hall, Mary K. Olson, Diane M. Meistad, Minnesota Office of Secretary of State, Laura Herrera, Texas Office of the Secretary of State, Greg Sullins, Docx LLC, IBM Lender Business Process Services Inc, Seterus Inc. Virginia M Rometty, IBM et al, Lloyd Craig Blankfein, Goldman Sachs & Co. et al, Fidelity National Title Company, Fidelity National Financial, et al Litton Loan Servicing LP, Ocwen Financial Corporation et al, Debra Lyman, Betty Wright, Larry B. Litton Sr., Larry B. Litton Jr., Quality Loan Service et al, Suzanne Eaton, John Kee, Pamela Campbell, Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation et al, Prommis Solutions et al, Lorrie Womack, Monica Mora, Tina Jones, Josh Magnuson, Stephen A. Feinberg, John W. Snow, Cerberus Capital Management L.P., Greg Sullins, Sanford I. Weill, Phil Gramm, James E. Cayne, James Dimon, EMC Mortage, Bear Stearns, JP Morgan Chase et al, Kevin R. McCarthy, Theresa Russell, Stephen Routh, David E. Fennell, Northwest Trustee Services Inc et al, James Danforth Quayle, CT Corporation, CT Corporation Systems, Nancy McKinstry, Wolters Kluwer et al; Bernadette McDonnell; Lori Beddard; B.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy Update – Bill Roth
    Analyst & Investor Day Presentation New York Stock Exchange March 16, 2017 Introduction & Two Harbors Team – Tim Perrott Analyst and Investor Day 2017 Agenda Two Harbors’ Analyst and Investor Day 2017 Agenda Laurie Goodman, Senior Director of the Housing Finance Policy Center Two Harbors’ Management Presentation Tom Siering – Executive Overview Bill Roth – Investment Overview Brad Farrell – CFO Overview Closing Remarks and Q&A 3 Safe Harbor Statement FORWARD- LOOKING STATEMENTS This presentation includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ from expectations, estimates and projections and, consequently, readers should not rely on these forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Words such as “expect,” “target,” “assume,” “estimate,” “project,” “budget,” “forecast,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “believe,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward- looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results, including, among other things, those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, and any subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, under the caption “Risk Factors.” Factors that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited
    [Show full text]
  • The Industrial Organization of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Market
    arfe6Wallace ARI 20 October 2014 10:39 The Industrial Organization of the US Residential Mortgage Market Richard Stanton, Johan Walden, and Nancy Wallace Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720; email: [email protected], [email protected], wallace@haas. berkeley.edu Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 2014. 6:19.1–19.30 Keywords The Annual Review of Financial Economics is mortgage, securitization, network online at financial.annualreviews.org This article’s doi: Abstract 10.1146/annurev-financial-110613-034324 We show that the US residential single-family mortgage-origination Copyright © 2014 by Annual Reviews. market is highly concentrated once account is taken of the contractual All rights reserved coordination that arises from the correspondent- and warehouse- JEL code: G21 funding channels. We represent these channels as a network, using the flow of loans through three strata of the loan origination market: origination, aggregation, and securitization. We develop a network representation of the origination market and demonstrate that it is a small world, in that most nodes are close in the network. We then rank-order the interlinked aggregators and securitizers using ex post mortgage foreclosure rates as a proxy for performance. Our findings suggest that these significant interlinkages in the mortgage-origination network represent a previously underappreciated source of systemic risk. Many apparently atomistic mortgage underwriters are, in fact, coordinated to act in parallel because of their funding relationships with the large, too-big-to-fail bank holding companies. 19.1 arfe6Wallace ARI 20 October 2014 10:39 1. INTRODUCTION The US residential single-family mortgage market is large in terms of the number of employees and the dollar volume of annual mortgage origination.
    [Show full text]
  • First-Day Declaration
    19-10412-jlg Doc 2 Filed 02/11/19 Entered 02/11/19 04:28:17 Main Document Pg 1 of 141 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 Telephone: (212) 310-8000 Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 Ray C. Schrock, P.C. Sunny Singh Proposed Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in Possession UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- X : In re : Chapter 11 : DITECH HOLDING CORPORATION, et al., : Case No. 19-[_____] (___) : Debtors.1 : (Joint Administration Pending) : --------------------------------------------------------------- X DECLARATION OF GERALD A. LOMBARDO PURSUANT TO RULE 1007-2 OF LOCAL BANKRUPTCY RULES FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK I, Gerald A. Lombardo, make this declaration under 28 U.S.C. §1746. 1. I am the Chief Financial Officer of Ditech Holding Corporation (“DHCP”) and its affiliated debtors in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”). I have served in this role since February 2018, having previously served in other financial leadership positions at other companies with over 25 years of experience. 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, as applicable, are Ditech Holding Corporation (0486), DF Insurance Agency LLC (6918), Ditech Financial LLC (5868), Green Tree Credit LLC (5864), Green Tree Credit Solutions LLC (1565), Green Tree Insurance Agency of Nevada, Inc. (7331), Green Tree Investment Holdings III LLC (1008), Green Tree Servicing Corp. (3552), Marix Servicing LLC (6101), Mortgage Asset Systems, LLC (8148), REO Management Solutions, LLC (7787), Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedules of Assets and Liabilities for Gmac
    12-12020-mg Doc 685 Filed 07/03/12 Entered 07/03/12 16:26:26 Main Document Pg 1 of 623 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 : RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al., 1 : Case No. 12-12020 (MG) : : : (Jointly Administered) Debtors. : ---------------------------------------------------------------x AMENDEDSCHEDULESSCHEDULES OF ASSETS OF ASSETS AND AND LIABILITIES LIABILITIES FOR FOR GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC (CASE NO. 12-12032) 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: Residential Capital, LLC (0738); ditech, LLC (7228); DOA Holding Properties, LLC (4257); DOA Properties IX (Lots-Other), LLC (3274), EPRE LLC (7974); Equity Investment I, LLC (2797); ETS of Virginia, Inc. (1445); ETS of Washington, Inc. (0665); Executive Trustee Services, LLC (8943); GMAC Model Home Finance I, LLC (8469); GMAC Mortgage USA Corporation (6930); GMAC Mortgage, LLC (4840); GMAC Residential Holding Company, LLC (2190); GMAC RH Settlement Services, LLC (6156); GMACM Borrower LLC (4887); GMACM REO LLC (2043); GMACR Mortgage Products, LLC (6369); GMAC-RFC Holding Company, LLC (3763); HFN REO Sub II, LLC (N/A); Home Connects Lending Services, LLC (9412); Homecomings Financial Real Estate Holdings, LLC (6869); Homecomings Financial, LLC (9458); Ladue Associates, Inc. (3048); Passive Asset Transactions, LLC (4130); PATI A, LLC (2729); PATI B, LLC (2937); PATI Real Estate Holdings, LLC
    [Show full text]