DOCSLIB.ORG

Johnson Survey Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Johnson Survey Comments 5. Please share any other comments or concerns you have about the johnson Road Full Improvements Project. Response I favor the three lane option with one very la rge drainage pipe (along with other utilities) beneath 1. the center (turn) lane. Seems to me that such an arrangement might facilitate maintenance without ~ Respons~ the necessity of closing down the whole road. I don't understand how pedestrians are able too safely cross the roundabout. I don't see it planned here and I watched the presentation and didn't hear it addressed. Living east of keller Smithfield we had 4 stops signs to stop traffic to allow pedestrians to pass. how does this work with a 2. roundabout? Given children are to walk to high school within the 2 m ile limits they are going to [VieW Response] have to cross at johnson across Keller Smithfield to get to the high school. Were studies done to evaluate pedestrian and bicycle traffic across the round about? The round about near Walmart Is quite frightening as there are folks who don't know how a roundabout wor ks I can't see them slowing down for bike or walkers. 3. The best option is to keep continuity on johnson Rd from 377 to Keller Smithfield Rd. Three lanes ~Response] with closed drainage is safer & w ill a llow traffic to flow most efficiently. Do it right the first time. Our property currently sits at 1650 johnson Road. Big Bear Creek runs directly t hrough the middle of our property. Our concern after attending the meeting is that if all water is being moved to Big Bear Creek. you will not be improving the drainage as the presentation suggested but you will only be transferring a drainage issue to us as well as those homes upstream of us. We purchased our property last year understanding that we currently have Big Bear Creek running through it. however. never dreamed that the city would propose to transfer additional water through our property. I would like to show you video and still pictures of what happens as t he situation currently is when it rains at our property. In no way w ill Big Bear Creek be able to accept more 4. water with the current situation upstream. At this point out property was researched and through [VieW Response] our research has been working properly and never flooded our site or our immediate neighbors for over forty years. lfthere is not serious consideration or research done or videos seen of the current water running through the property you w ill flood our property without a doubt. Please allow us the opportunity to show you what happens currently and to explain what you w ill do to ensure that we w ill not experience a flood at the first ra in during or after construction. We have been consistently promised that the city would not make any decisions that would adversely affect a howmonwers property. Not sure that adequate research is being done to alleviate the issue instead of moving the issue to another part of johnson. Thank you Question 3: No curbs--there are too many cyclists and having a curb leaves the cyclist no where to go when being run off the road. Bar ditches are a bad idea as well because they get filled w ith rocks and debris and it's not a good place to wreck. Burying the utilit ies would not only benefit the trees by not having to be cut away from the lines but will benefit the cyclists as well by having one 5. less obstacle to deal with when being run off t he road .. and it happens a lot! I like the idea of [ View Response J sidewalks but would not be beneficial to me so I would at least want them on the south side for the school if the johnson Road residents don't support t hem. I real ize this is out of t he scope oft his proJect but making the intersection of Rufe Snow and johnson a round-about would keep traffic flowing smoother. 1/19 I am in favor of the single lane roundabout and the 3 lane johnson road improvement. I am concerned that a 10 foot trail included in the plan would not actually connect to anything which 6. would make it useless since the nearest completed trail is south of 1709. IView Response I Is there a project plan (including t ime frames) for the city's trail improvements? I've seen the current and master plans but there are no time tables on those maps. I'd like to see t ree impacts limited and acquisition of ROW minimized, but I also think it's important to maximize trail & sidewalk improvements while addressing the drainage issues. I am concerned about the capacity of the stream south of johnson & Rhonda to accommodate d rainage from the 7. IView Response I entire project. I am bothered by the presence of homes within the FEMA statutoryfloodway in that area as well. I would like to hear more about how the flow w ill be managed at that point and southward. Most of the homes in this area have acreage (with horses or cattle); therefore, it is imperative to maintain the country feel. In the nearly 10 years that I have lived here, I have only known of one 8. wreck (a teen hit a mail box while texting). I see no need for a turn lane and have never had a IView Response I problem exiting my driveway even during rush t imes. A wider road would only encourage speeding. There needs to be a sidewalk for public safety. Don't see the need for two sidewalks. But not overly opposed to having two. Don't need a 10 foot wide trail. 9. IView Response I Have already flipped riding mower once trying to mow the deepest part of my bar ditch. Keeping composure turning off mower as gasoline pours out gas cap vent onto me. Wait ing for blade to stop before pushing mower off me. Really want curb and gutter!!! I strongly urge the city to install enclosed drainage alongjohnson Road. Any other solution is 10. temporary, likely insufficient, requires higher ROW and contributes to the inevitable need for [YJeW Resp"OOSe] future repairs to the new roadway. Has anyone communicated wit h Southlake to f ind out what their plans are for johnson rod from 11. Pearson to FM 1938? If Southlake plans on widening the road it would make sense for Keller's plans [VieW Resp~ to match. Don't like the ideal of the round about. Can't get out of our driveway as it is at t imes now due to all t he traffic and cars that speed down our road going 50-60 mph. Stopping at the top of the hill to turn in our driveway is difficult, people behind don't want to stop for oncoming traffic to get past us. 12. IView Response I Please listen to your residents that live on johnson Rd and surrounding roads, work for us too. I have lived here for over 30 years and what is going on around my neighborhood saddens me. What happened to Keep Kel ler Country and Beautiful? johnson Rd is one of the prettiest roads in Keller and it's about to be destroyed. Please be sure to do additional studies to make sure the creek can handle the addit ional water 13. flow from whatever drainage solutions are selected before proceeding. The city owes it to those IView Response I property owners to not cause excessive flooding and damage to those properties johnson road from Randall Mill to Rufe Snow has got to be the worst roads in Keller. I have to 14. travel this road everyday several times a day and has so many potholes and patches. Th is road IView Response I needs a desperately need a new pavement o n both sides of the roads. I'm concerned with what w ill happen to the residents around Big Bear Creek at Rhonda Rd if you channel all of the drainage to there. Residents there have already expressed concern with the amount of water they already have during a normal storm. Adding more water to it sounds like it could be catastrophic to the surrounding properties. Something would need to be done to address 15. the creek's capacity. IView Response I I travel johnson road daily. While I agree something needs to be done to address all of your goals, I would hate to lose the beauty of the t rees and properties surrounding it. Preserve as much as you can, please. The round about is a must for this area. The4 way stop is not working anymore in the mornings 16. and afternoons. Too much traffic and people don't know hoe to yield right of way. For some reason [VleW Resp~ people pu ll up to the 4 way stop and can't remember how right of way works. Please do not add lanes and destroy the beautiful oak trees that have been there for years. Most ALL of the traffic issues are due to people going to/from work in Southlake/ Westlake· not due to 17. the residents of Keller. They need to use 1709 more. These people speed excessively and there is IView Response I never Keller police monitoring johnson Rd. One sidewalk would be good on whichever side that saves the most trees and does not im pact residents property.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roundabout Planning, Design, and Operations Manual
    Roundabout Planning, Design, and Operations Manual December 2015 Alabama Department of Transportation ROUNDABOUT PLANNING, DESIGN, AND OPERATIONS MANUAL December 2015 Prepared by: The University Transportation Center for of Alabama Steven L. Jones, Ph.D. Abdulai Abdul Majeed Steering Committee Tim Barnett, P.E., ALDOT Office of Safety Operations Stuart Manson, P.E., ALDOT Office of Safety Operations Sonya Baker, ALDOT Office of Safety Operations Stacey Glass, P.E., ALDOT Maintenance Stan Biddick, ALDOT Design Bryan Fair, ALDOT Planning Steve Walker, P.E., ALDOT R.O.W. Vince Calametti, P.E., ALDOT 9th Division James Brown, P.E., ALDOT 2nd Division James Foster, P.E., Mobile County Clint Andrews, Federal Highway Administration Blair Perry, P.E., Gresham Smith & Partners Howard McCulloch, P.E., NE Roundabouts DISCLAIMER This manual provides guidelines and recommended practices for planning and designing roundabouts in the State of Alabama. This manual cannot address or anticipate all possible field conditions that will affect a roundabout design. It remains the ultimate responsibility of the design engineer to ensure that a design is appropriate for prevailing traffic and field conditions. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose ...................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2. Scope and Organization ............................................................................... 1-7 1.3. Limitations ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Road to Resilience Delivering a Robust Local Roads Network
    Road to resilience Delivering a robust local roads network December 2018 Road to resilience | Delivering a robust local roads network 3 Foreword Local roads are often, rightly, described as the lifeblood of local Balfour Beatty has a proud history of working on roads of all sizes, economies across the country, keeping transport flowing around across the country. The local authorities we work with are doing towns and cities and supporting local supply chains. their utmost to ensure the resilience of their local roads and to repair the damage caused by the harsh winter. Indeed, according Unfortunately, they also bear the brunt of congestion, which can to the Local Government Association (LGA), local authorities fix a have a significant impact on the productivity – or otherwise – of pothole every 21 seconds1. Where our local authority partners have those local economies, and on air quality, due to the needless secured additional capital investment for their roads, we have emissions from vehicles waiting in queues. The difference seen a reduction on revenue expenditure, and public satisfaction between the condition of local roads and the Strategic Roads improving. The money announced at the Autumn Budget will Network (SRN) is now significant in some areas, and is noticeable therefore be extremely welcome. to motorists. It will of course be important to ensure that this much-needed The backlog of maintenance on these roads, due to years of extra money is made to go as far as it can – that advances in underinvestment, is made worse by pothole problems which technology are capitalised on and that local authorities and the arise after harsh winters, further squeezing already constrained industry work together as closely as possible to drive efficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Occurrence of Potholes and Washboards on Soil-Aggregate Roads EUGENE Y
    A Study of Occurrence of Potholes and Washboards on Soil-Aggregate Roads EUGENE Y. HUANG, Associate Professor of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois This report presents the results of a study aimed at determining some of the circumstances associated with the occurrence of potholes and washboards on soil-aggregate roads. The study consisted of a statistical analysis of the qualitative data obtained from a road condition survey involving road surfaces of the coarse-graded aggregate type composed of mineral aggregate such as gravel or crushed stone and some binder material. Results of the study indicate that the occurrence of potholes and washboards was definitely associated with the volume of traffic, the type of surface material, and the drainage condition of the road surface. Although the findings are admittedly limited to the types and conditions of the roads studied, it is hoped that the data may be of value in further understanding the formation of potholes and washboards. • THE OCCURRENCE of potholes and washboards has long been a serious problem in soil-aggregate surfaces. These formations, however, have not been fully explained. Potholes on road surfaces are irregularly occurring, well-defined holes consisting of fairly deep cavities up to about 5 in. (Fig. 1). Washboards are transverse or nearly transverse waves on road surfaces, generally about 1 to 1/4 in. in amplitude andspaced about 2 or 3 ft apart (Fig. 2), regardless of the nature of material in which they occur. (Although typical formations of potholes and washboards are readily distinguishable, there are, however, numerous possibilities of transitional forms between these two typical forms.) Both potholes and washboards are conducive to surface impact and vibration, which contribute in a great measure to the rapid deterioration of the road surface as well as the vehicle itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Viscosity Resin for Reinforcing Pothole Patching Materials
    NIST Civil Infrastructure Showcase 3-14-14 Gaithersburg, MD Development of High-Toughness, Low- Viscosity Resin for Reinforcing Pothole Patching Materials BruinPatch, Inc. A UCLA Startup for Improving National Infrastructure Larry Carlson UCLA Institute for Technology Advancement President, Bruinpatch, Inc. [email protected] (818) 970-5532 Engineering Institute for Technology Advancement Product Product: A long lasting pothole repair method that utilizes a low viscosity resin, a patented catalyst and UCLA’s patented approach Integrated Dual Phase Approach Porous asphalt with Top Phase: infiltrated DCPD layer • Moisture resistant • High toughness Interface • Durable, rutting resistant Densely compacted Bottom Phase: asphalt layer • Compacted standard materials • Low Cost Cross-section DCPD Resin Curing Schematic illustration of aggregate-asphalt mix Ring-opening Metathesis Polymerization infiltrated with DCPD and formed a hardened continuous network within • Capable of infiltrating into the voids, and Reduction of continuous and interconnected voids • Reinforce the continuous phase of the aggregate composites Curing Profile cold mix 160 'C Interface of cold mix and D2 mix 120 D2 160 'C 1.5 min 100 4 min 80 60 Surface of cold mix Temperature 'C 40 Resin added 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Time Minute Curing profiles were recorded by measuring temperature profile on the surface and at the interface of the porous mix and dense mix. Catalyst Development 180 160 180 C831 0 TPP 140 C831 160 -20'C to RT C727 0.03% TPP -11'C -3'C 140 120 0 TPP -5'C 120
    [Show full text]
  • Cornell Local Roads Program Town of Ticonderoga, NY 2016
    Cornell Local Roads Program Town of Ticonderoga, NY 2016 Colvin Chapman and Samuel Shelmidine Ticonderoga Highway Department 138 Racetrack Rd. Ticonderoga, NY 12883 Table of Contents I. Introduction………………………………………...………………....3 A. Background of Roads………………………………………....3 B. Fundamentals of good roads………………………………….6 II. CAMP­RS Process …………………………………………………..9 A. CAMP­RS Training…………………………………..……....9 B. Road Surveying ……………………………………………...9 C. Pavement Distresses………………………………………….10 D. Roads by Rank……………………………………………….15 E. Assign Repairs……………………………………………….16 III. Assessment Results…………………………………………………..18 IV. Recommendation…………………………………………………......19 V. Sources……………………………………………………………….19 Appendix A: Ticonderoga Local Roads Assessment Appendix B: Ticonderoga Map of Local Roads. Appendix C: CAMP­RS Asphalt Pavement Condition Survey Appendix D: CAMP­RS Unpaved Condition Survey 2 I. Introduction The Cornell Local Roads Program Center provides training, technical assistance, and information to municipal officials and employees responsible for the maintenance, construction, and management of local highways and bridges in New York State. This educational service has been widely used throughout New York State by many municipalities who wish to run their highway departments more effectively and efficiently. Part of the Cornell Local Roads Program (CLRP) is a cost analysis tool developed by Civil Engineers from Cornell University. The purpose of this tool is to generate a road database for prioritizing and recommending various repairs objectively. The basis of the program is to collect road condition data and catalog a detailed list of information through software known as the Cornell Asset Management Program ­ Roads & Streets (CAMP­RS). CAMP­RS functions chiefly by “Keeping good roads good” and consistently improving the conditions of subpar roads within the constraints of a limited budget. CAMP­RS outputs a prioritized list of repairs in order to efficiently raise the condition of all roads to an acceptable level.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling Infrastructure Version 1
    Cycling VERSION 1 infrastructure Cycling infrastructure In this chapter 01 Introduction 5 Kerbside activity 33 07 02 Choosing the right facility 6 General Design 35 08 2.1 Design parameters 6 8.1 Design controls 35 2.2 Types of cycle facility 8 8.2 Horizontal and vertical alignment 39 8.3 Widths and clearances 41 03 Approved facilities within the road reserve 11 8.4 Construction 45 3.1 Separated cycleway (busy, fast, or heavy traffic) 11 8.5 Drainage 46 3.2 Separated cycleway (low volume and slow traffic) 14 8.6 Signs and markings 47 3.3 Alternatives requiring specific approval 15 8.7 Lighting 48 3.4 Mixed traffic streets 16 3.5 Cycle streets 16 Ancillary features 49 09 3.6 Pedestrian priority areas (cycling and pedestrians) 17 3.7 Interim facilities 20 Design for maintenance 52 10 Appendix A 04 Other infrastructure 22 Cycle parking 53 4.1 Buffered cycle lanes 22 A.1 Introduction 53 4.2 Cycle lanes 23 A.2 Bicycle Parking General principles 54 4.3 Cycle lanes between other traffic lanes 23 A.3 Categories of bicycle parking 56 4.4 Shared paths 24 A.4 Types of bicycle parking 58 A.5 Types of bicycle stands 64 05 Off road cycle paths 25 A.6 Bicycle parking placement 67 A.7 Bicycle parking access 68 06 Intersections 26 A.8 Bicycle stand materials 68 6.1 Cycleway intersections 27 A.9 Signage and wayfinding for bicycle parking 68 6.2 Roundabouts 27 A.10 Bicycle parking demand 69 6.3 Signalised intersections 28 A.11 Bicycle parking at public transport terminals 70 6.4 Unsignalised intersections 30 A.12 Bicycle parking provisioning process 71 6.5 Midblock crossing 31 A.13 Building and installation 72 6.6 Vehicle crossings 32 A.14 Operation and maintenance 72 5794_20.04.21 2 TDM | ENGINEERING DESIGN CODE 3 Cycling infrastructure 01 Introduction PURPOSE Cycling infrastructure includes facilities that are dedicated for cycle use, as well as specific standards for general infrastructure to meet the needs of cycle users.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintenance and Pothole Projects in Wyandotte County Next Week
    IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 27, 2020 For more information: Kelly Kultala (785) 207-0715 [email protected] Maintenance and pothole projects in Wyandotte County next week The Kansas Department of Transportation will conduct maintenance projects and pothole patching starting, Monday, March 30 in Wyandotte County, weather permitting. Southbound U.S. 69/18th Street at Merriam Lane will be reduced to one lane for pipe maintenance and shoulder work on southbound U.S. 69/18th Street exit ramp, from 8 a.m., Monday, March 30 to Wednesday, April 1. Eastbound and westbound I-670, will have alternating lane closures on Monday, March 30, from I-70 to the Missouri state line, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., for pothole patching. Eastbound and westbound I-70 will have alternating lane closures on Monday, March 30, from KTA/61st Street to the Missouri state line, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., for pothole patching. Northbound and southbound I-635 will have the right lane closed on Monday, March 30, from the Wyandotte County line to State Line Road for pothole patching. Traffic will be controlled by mobile lane closures using traffic cones, trucks with arrow boards and digital message boards KDOT urges all motorists to be alert and obey the warning signs when approaching and driving through a highway work zone. To stay aware of all road construction projects across Kansas go to www.kandrive.org or call 5-1-1. Drive safely and always wear your seat belt. ### This information can be made available in alternative accessible formats upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • Bumpy Road Ahead: AMERICA’S ROUGHEST RIDES and STRATEGIES to MAKE OUR ROADS SMOOTHER
    Bumpy Road Ahead: AMERICA’S ROUGHEST RIDES AND STRATEGIES TO MAKE OUR ROADS SMOOTHER OCTOBER 2018 TRIPNET.ORG Founded in 1971, TRIP ® of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit organization that researches, evaluates and distributes economic and technical data on surface transportation issues. TRIP is sponsored by insurance companies, equipment manufacturers, distributors and suppliers; businesses involved in highway and transit engineering and construction; labor unions; and organizations concerned with efficient and safe surface transportation. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: KEY FACTS ABOUT OUR NATION’S URBAN ROADS Keeping the wheel steady on America's roads and highways has become increasingly challenging as drivers encounter potholes and pavement deterioration. One-third of the nation’s major urban roadways – highways and major streets that are the main routes for commuters and commerce – are in poor condition. These critical links in the nation’s transportation system carry 70 percent of the approximately 3.2 trillion miles driven annually in America. Road conditions could deteriorate even further as the rate of vehicle travel continues to increase and local and state governments find they are unable to adequately fund road repairs. In this report, TRIP examines the condition of the nation’s major roads, including pavement condition data for America’s most populous urban areas, recent trends in travel, the latest developments in repairing roads and building them to last longer, and the funding levels needed to adequately address America’s deteriorated roadways. For the purposes of this report, an urban area includes the major city in a region and its neighboring or surrounding suburban areas. Pavement condition data are the latest available and are derived from the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) 2016 annual survey of state transportation officials on the condition of major state and locally maintained roads and highways, based on a uniform pavement rating index.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundabout Maintenance Manual Indiana LTAP
    Indiana LTAP Roundabout Maintenance Manual Roundabout Maintenance Manual January 2015 INDIANA LTAP CENTER Purdue University Civil Engineering 3000 Kent Ave. Ste. C2-118 West Lafayette, Indiana 47906 Telephone: (765) 494-2164 Toll Free in Indiana: (800) 428-7639 Facsimile: (765) 496-1176 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................... 7 Section I: Winter Maintenance ........................................................................ 8 Snowplowing ......................................................................................................................................... 8 De-icing ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Equipment .............................................................................................................................................. 9 Section II: Summer Maintenance ................................................................... 10 Suggested Landscaping ..................................................................................................................... 10 Central Island Maintenance ............................................................................................................. 10 Splitter Island Maintenance ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Are Pothole Claims Handled?
    How Are Pothole Claims Handled? City streets have taken a beating these past years. Heavy rains, freezing temperatures, ice and snow have taken their toll. The resulting potholes and defects are usually considered road hazards. They are not due to negligence on the part of the City. Springfield Development and Public Works (DPW) uses a complaint driven system to address road defects such as potholes. DPW relies on reports from the public to locate road defects. Call the DPW operations division at 541-726-3761 to report potholes. Based on reports from the public, DPW will prioritize needed repairs. Is it a pothole? Potholes form when rainwater sinks through cracks in old or weakened asphalt. The water saturates the road’s aggregate base. Vehicles passing over the road force fine particles of the roadbed up and out of cracks in the asphalt (called pumping). Loss of fine particles from the aggregate base result in voids. These voids cause the aggregate base and the asphalt layer to sink. As the as asphalt sinks it eventually cracks under the continued impact of vehicle tires and chunks come loose. A sinkhole is a hole that reaches past the base of the roadway. Sinkholes are generally larger and deeper than potholes. They are usually caused by a source of water under the pavement, such as a broken pipe. The water causes the soil to wash away, creating a void under the pavement, and eventually the pavement gives away. Delaminations are formed when the upper asphalt concrete layer becomes detached and breaks apart from the underlying layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Continued Evaluation of Pothole Patching Equipment, Materials, and Processes
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADA Notice TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate TR0003 (REV 10/98) formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654-3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER CA14-2338 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE Continued Evaluation of Pothole Patching Equipment, 06/14/2014 Materials, and Processes 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Duane Bennett, Steven A. Velinsky UCD-ARR-14-06-30-03 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NUMBER Advanced Highway Maintenance and Construction Technology (AHMCT) Research Center Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering University of California, Davis 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER Davis, California 95616-5294 IA 65A0416, Task ID: 2338 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED Final Report 12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS July 2012 - June 2014 California Department of Transportation PO Box 942873, MS #83 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 Caltrans 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 16. ABSTRACT California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) maintenance crews repaired approximately 75,000 potholes from 2012-2013. Widely disbursed over 50,000 lane miles of highway, these potholes in most cases rendered conventional lane closures for safe access impractical. Instead, maintenance crews were typically resigned to capitalize on breaks in traffic to rapidly go out and place cold patch asphalt into a pothole and quickly retreat. After the deaths of two Caltrans workers who were patching potholes in 2006-2007, Caltrans tasked the Advanced Highway Maintenance and Construction Technology (AHMCT) Research Center with developing a safer and more efficient means of patching potholes.
    [Show full text]
  • Calls Raised Through Highways Telephone Help Desk Leeds City Council, Highways Services Recorded Against Dewsbury Road, Holbeck Between 02/04/2010 and 02/04/2012
    Calls raised through Highways Telephone Help Desk Leeds City Council, Highways Services Recorded against Dewsbury Road, Holbeck between 02/04/2010 and 02/04/2012 Request Type:Carriageway Fault: Potholes (W) CALL: roads-potholes-on dewsbury road opposite no. 10 ring road beeston there is a pothole on the eastbound road. 410740 Recorded:08/04/2010 Cleared: 15/04/2010 Request Type:Carriageway Fault: Potholes (W) CALL: roads-potholes-edge det outside house 553 to the end . pothole outside 551 .and outside 545 to 551 411232 Recorded:14/04/2010 Cleared: 23/04/2010 Request Type:Footpaths Fault: Broken Kerbs (W) CALL: footpaths-broken kerbs-low kerb outside house 559. 411244 Recorded:14/04/2010 Cleared: 23/04/2010 Request Type: Carriageway Fault: Potholes (W) CALL: roads-potholes- outside no 400 pothole in the road. 412472 Recorded:29/04/2010 Cleared: 12/05/2010 Request Type: Carriageway Fault: Potholes (W) CALL: roads-potholes- pothole on dewsbury road citybound just past the bridge and before the speed camera. between house no.s 524 and 522. 412663 Recorded:30/04/2010 Cleared: 12/05/2010 Request Type:Carriageway Fault: Potholes (W) CALL: roads-potholes- opp fire station at pelican crossing pothole also opp junction with waincliff mount pothole at box. 412839 Recorded:05/05/2010 Cleared: 07/05/2010 Page 1 of 24 Date produced: 03/04/2012 Calls raised through Highways Telephone Help Desk Leeds City Council, Highways Services Recorded against Dewsbury Road, Holbeck between 02/04/2010 and 02/04/2012 Request Type:Footpaths Fault: Broken Loose Flags(W CALL: footpaths-broken loose flags- junc tunstall road tactile paving proud side of legal world also outside legal world footway damaged.
    [Show full text]