2010 Academic Program Review Department Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2010 Academic Program Review Department Of Front Cover magnesium carbonate, synthesized by hot isostatic pressing at T=600oC, P=300 MPa (grain size = 1.1 m, SEM image by J. Newman, from Masters thesis research of N. Davis, 2005) Back Cover high-resolution seismic image of collapsed paleokarst system (from 3-D reflection survey, Y. Sun) 2010 Academic Program Review Department of Geology & Geophysics Texas A&M University Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Welcome from the Department Head .......................................................................... 1 1.2 Charge to Review Committee ..................................................................................... 3 1.3 Departmental Strengths and Challenges ...................................................................... 5 1.4 Schedule of Review ..................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 2 – Departmental Overview ............................................................................................ 11 2.1 History of Department ............................................................................................... 11 2.2 Statement of Department Mission & Goals .............................................................. 13 2.3 Summary of 2002 External Program Review ............................................................ 14 2.4 Changes since 2002 and Current State of the Department ........................................ 21 Chapter 3 - Departmental Administration and Management ........................................................ 33 3.1 Department Head ....................................................................................................... 33 3.2 Assistant Department Head ....................................................................................... 34 3.3 Department Meetings and Committees ..................................................................... 34 3.4 Geology and Geophysics Student Organizations ...................................................... 45 3.5 Administrative and Technical Services ..................................................................... 46 3.6 Financial and Academic Summary ............................................................................ 50 3.7 Faculty Endowments ................................................................................................. 58 3.8 Facilities .................................................................................................................... 59 Chapter 4 - Centers and Affiliations ............................................................................................. 61 4.1 Center for Tectonophysics ......................................................................................... 61 4.2 Berg-Hughes Center for Petroleum and Sedimentary Systems ................................. 62 i 4.3 Integrated Ocean Drilling Program ........................................................................... 63 4.4 Geochemical and Environmental Research Group ................................................... 64 4.5 Department of Oceanography ................................................................................... 64 4.6 Department of Geography ......................................................................................... 65 4.7 Water Management and Hydrological Sciences Program ......................................... 65 4.8 Industrial Partnerships ............................................................................................... 65 Chapter 5 - Undergraduate Programs ........................................................................................... 69 5.1 Program Goals ........................................................................................................... 69 5.2 Program Philosophy and Design ............................................................................... 69 5.3 Program Descriptions ................................................................................................ 70 5.4 Undergraduate Student Profiles ................................................................................. 81 5.5 Courses Offered to Non-Majors ................................................................................ 85 5.6 Administration ........................................................................................................... 86 5.7 Program Assessment and Outcomes ......................................................................... 87 5.8 Strengths and Challenges of Undergraduate Programs ............................................. 88 Chapter 6 - Graduate Program ...................................................................................................... 91 6.1 Program Goals ........................................................................................................... 91 6.2 Program Overview and Philosophy ........................................................................... 91 6.3 Degree requirements .................................................................................................. 92 6.4 Advising .................................................................................................................... 93 6.5 Recruitment and Admissions ..................................................................................... 93 6.6 Financial Support ...................................................................................................... 97 6.7 Graduate Student Profiles ........................................................................................ 100 6.8 Student Internships .................................................................................................. 104 6.9 Industry Contributions to Graduate Education ........................................................ 104 6.10 Program Assessment and Outcomes ....................................................................... 105 6.11 Strengths and Challenges of Graduate Programs .................................................... 106 Chapter 7 - Departmental Research ............................................................................................ 107 7.1 Research Strengths of the Department .................................................................... 107 7.2 Research Groups and Centers .................................................................................. 111 7.3 Research Facilities ................................................................................................... 115 ii 7.4 Research Publications .............................................................................................. 127 7.5 Research Grants and Contracts ................................................................................ 129 7.6 Faculty Recognition and Service ............................................................................. 132 Chapter 8 - Summary .................................................................................................................. 135 8.1 Status of Strategic Plan ............................................................................................ 135 8.2 New Initiatives and Planning .................................................................................. 138 iii Table of Figures Figure 2.1. Faculty and Staff in Department of Geology and Geophysics since Spring 2002 .... 25 Figure 2.2. Geology and Geophysics Student Enrollment since 2002. ....................................... 29 Figure 2.3. Undergraduate and Graduate Semester Credit Hours since 2002 ............................. 30 Figure 3.1. Total Research Funds for Calendar Years 2006 to 2009, and Annual Expenditures (including TAMRF, TAMU-RS, and TEES) for Department of Geology and Geophysics in Fiscal Years 2004-2005 to 2008-2009 ............................................... 55 Figure 4.1. Mutual Benefits of University-Industry Partnerships with Petroleum Companies. .. 66 Figure 5.1. Undergraduate Field Geology and Geophysics Methods Courses ............................ 78 Figure 5.2. Undergraduate Enrollment in Field Courses ............................................................. 79 Figure 5.3. Summer Field Geology (Geol 300) ........................................................................... 79 Figure 5.4. Undergraduate Enrollment in Department of Geology and Geophysics; Total Number of Majors and Geology (B.S. and B.A.) and Geophysics B.S. Students ..... 82 Figure 5.5. Nationwide Geoscience Student Enrollments (2009 AGI Geoscience Workforce Program) .................................................................................................................... 82 Figure 5.6. SAT Scores by Major (mean values and maximum/minimum scores of incoming freshman) ................................................................................................................... 83 Figure 5.7. Years to Complete Undergraduate Degrees .............................................................. 84 Figure 5.8. Diversity in Undergraduate Enrollment; Student Numbers shown by Year (Percentage of under-represented students among domestic students labeled) ........ 85 Figure 5.9. Undergraduate Enrollment by Gender. Student Numbers shown for Male and Female (and Total) Students by Year (Percentage of female students labeled) .................... 85 Figure
Recommended publications
  • Texas Co-Op Power • March 2017
    LOCAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE EDITION MARCH 2017 Blizzard of ’57 Spring Vegetable Salads Palo Duro Pageant 35 35on Brake-worthy stops on highway through co-op country THE TRACTOR THAT STARTED IT ALL. IS CHANGING IT ALL. Metal Hood, Fenders New Deluxe Seat** New Swift-TTaach Loader** New Grille Guard New Dash Panel & Operator Platform & Tilt Steering Wheel & Swift-Connect Backhoe & Front Hitch & Display ALL-NEWW KUBOTTAA BX80 SERIES Low-Rate, Long-TTeerm Financing 6 YYeear Goingg On Noww! Limited Powertrain Warrantyy* kubota.com *Only terms and conditions of Kubota’s standard Limited Warranty applyy.. For warranty terms, see Kubota’s Limited Warranty at www.kubota.com or authorized Kubota Dealers. **Only avvaailable on certain models. Optional equipment may be shown. © Kubota TTrractor Corporation, 2017 Since 1944 March 2017 FAVORITES 5 Letters 6 Currents 18 Local Co-op News Get the latest information plus energy and safety tips from your cooperative. 29 Texas History Panhandle Blizzard of 1957 By Dawn Stephens 31 Recipes Spring Vegetable Salads 35 Focus on Texas Photo Contest: In Motion 36 Around Texas List of Local Events 38 Hit the Road Texas on a Grand Stage in Palo Duro By Sheryl Smith-Rodgers Marker near the northern end ONLINE of Interstate 35 in Texas, just TexasCoopPower.com south of the Red River Find these stories online if they don’t appear in your edition of the magazine. FEATURE Texas USA Odessa Meteor Crater 35 on 35 8 Stops with fascinating food, history and popular By E.R. Bills culture lure travelers from the interstate as it weaves Observations through Texas from Mexico to Oklahoma Another Roadside Attraction Story and photos by Julia Robinson By Ryann Ford ROAD TRIP! See video and photos at TexasCoopPower.com NEXT MONTH Drones: An Overview Texas inno- vators, including electric co-ops, hone drones as tools of today.
    [Show full text]
  • Barringer Meteorite Crater, Coconino County, Arizona
    BARRINGERI' METEORITE CRATER, COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA Eugene Shoemaker CaliforniaInstitute of Technology David Roddy United States Geological Survey Carleton Moore Arizona State University Robert Dietz Arizona State University A one-day field trip will visit Barringer Meteorite Crater. Partici­ pants will depart from Tempe in the evening and spend the night in Flagstaff. The field trip will depart from Flagstaff to the Crater and will return to Flagstaff and Phoenix on the same day. At the Crater participants may choose from a number of guided or self-guided op­ tions to visit this interesting geologic feature. In addition to the road guide included here participants will be provided with a ''Guidebook to the Geology of Meteor Crater, Arizona" prepared for the 37th Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society. It has been reprinted and is available from the Center forMeteorite Studies, Arizona State Uni­ versity, Tempe, Arizona 85281. Access to the Crater is by the courtesy of the Barringer Crater Company and Meteor Crater Enterprises, Inc. Visitors must receive permission to enter nonpublic areas of the Crater. SYNOPSIS OF THE The Supai Formation consists of interbedded red and GEOLOGY OF METEOR CRATER yellow fine-grained argillaceous sandstone and subordinate by Eugene M. Shoemaker siltstone. It is more than 300 meters (1,000 feet) thick in REGIONAL SETTING this region (Pierce, 1958, p. 84), but not more than 100 Meteor Crater lies in north-central Arizona in the Can­ meters or so (a few hundred feet) have been penetrated by yon Diablo region of the southern part of the Colorado drill holes at the crater.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Page
    Contents Page Adventists and Genesis The Primary Time Theory Refuted By Paul Nethercott 2008 Contents Introduction Jehovah Witness Viewpoint Seventh Day Adventist Viewpoint The Age Of the Earth Is the Age Of Mankind Scientific Contradictions To The Book Of Genesis No Gap Between Genesis 1:1 and 1:3 Radioactive Dating Is Whole Rock Dating Radioactive Dating And Fossil Ages Radioactive Dating Of ‘Pre‐Cambrian’ Rocks Genesis Versus Radio‐Active Dating Chronology Controversy Over Radiometric Dating Methods The Days Of Creation Are Literal 24 Hour Days Ellen G. Whites Comments Gunter Faure Brent Dalrymple History Of Modern Creationism The Biblical Account Of Origins In the Beginning Where Did the Light on the First Day Come From? Light On The First Day Of Creation Loma Linda University Conclusions References www.CreationOnTheWeb.org Adventists And Genesis 1 Introduction The Men Behind The Idea The Founders Of The Primary Time Theory Pastor Russell Judge Rutherford Nathan Homer Knorr Jehovah’s Witnesses The Bible does not say how long a period elapsed between the beginning when God created the heaven and the earth, and the Jehovah’s Witnesses beginning of the creative week used in perfecting it for man: nor do Long before the beginning of those Jehovah’s Witnesses geologists agree amongst seven days the molten mass had “In the beginning God created the heavens and the themselves as to the period of this thrown off great quantities of mineral interval‐‐a few extremists indulge in Earth.” (Genesis 1:1) Just how long ago the starry substances in vapor form, and these heavens and the earth were created is not stated In wild speculations of millions of had formed into rings around the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Pecos Trail Newsletter Aug-2016
    Texas Pecos Trail Region Newsletter August 2016 TPTR Mission The Texas Pecos Trail Region develops and promotes heritage preservation and tourism throughout the richly diverse West Texas area. Inside this Issue: Pecos Trail Partners Event — 1 Midland TX, Petroleum Museum Pecos Trail Partners Event—Midland TPTR Partners Event, Cont’d 2 The Texas Pecos Trail Region held our bi-monthly Partners Event on Travel Itinerary: 2 July 21 in Midland TX at the Permian Basin Petroleum Museum. Guests Outlaws and Lawmen came from Brackettville, Crane, Eldorado, Junction, Langtry, McCamey, Get Ready for State Fair 3 Midland, Monahans, and Sonora. Jordan Resigns, New ED 3 Museum staff led attendees on a guided tour of the museum, which has been recently renovated with immersive, state-of-the-art exhibits to Preservation Spotlight: 3 Odessa Meteor Crater enhance the visitor experience. Attendees were introduced to the new Permian Sea diorama, historic photos and rare artifacts of the Permian Aug Calendar of Events 4 Basin oil fields and communities, oil and gas exploration technology, Contact Information 4 alternative energy sources, mid-20th-Century cultural life, and the near-futuristic Petrotrekker ride. At the business meeting we discussed recent travel guide promotions TPTR Board of Directors at regional events, funding for the current and upcoming fiscal years, and State Fair participation. The board approved heritage tourism grants to Bill Hodges (Chair) Rancher, Eldorado the George W. Bush Childhood Home in Midland for public reading Ellen Crossland (Vice Chair) programs and to the Kimble County Historical Museum for exhibit Mendoza Trail Museum, McCamey development in their new museum facilities in Junction.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OBSERVER the Astronomy Club of Tulsa’S NewsleEr Published Since 1937
    THE OBSERVER The Astronomy Club of Tulsa’s Newsleer Published Since 1937 RON WOOD NETA APPLE JOHN LAND JACK EASTMAN BRAD YOUNG ANN BRUNN FIND AThe BIT Astronomy OF HEAVEN Club IN ofOKLAHOMA Tulsa Prepares to Mark its 75th Year in a few Months! www.astrotulsa.com All Rights Reserved Copyright 2011 Astronomy Club of Tulsa. NOVEMBER 2011 EDITORS NOTES THE COVER About This Issue: Few things will no longer appear every month. One will be Actomart as this is a great secon we just are not selling enough to keep it up every month. It will show back up as we have items our members would like to sell. The other will be The Toy Box and this does not appear every month because a cern degree of research goes into this so we don’t just list items because they are new. Speaking of new we have added one new secon this month , Beginners Challenge and we just have wait and see what response it has. I will con‐ nue to try new things and always welcome and credit suggesons. Starng next month we will be adding NASA’s Spaceplace as a feature, but more about that next month. ASTRONOMER OF THE MONTH To Submit to the Observer: This month we go about 2,700 years forward and honor Carl Sagan. This should have been a easy Email your arcle or content with pictures to jer‐ one for many of you who have read his books and [email protected] please put newsleer in seen the acclaimed Cosmos TV Mini‐Series.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Upcoming Events
    Texas Pecos Trail Region Newsletter August 2015 TPTR Mission The Texas Pecos Trail Region develops and promotes heritage preservation and tourism throughout the richly diverse West Texas area. Inside this Issue: Pecos Trail Partners Event— 1 McCamey Pecos Trail Partners Event — McCamey TPTR Partners Event, Cont’d 2 The Texas Pecos Trail Region held our bi-monthly Partners Event on Travel Itinerary: 2 Natural Wonders July 16 in McCamey TX at the Santa Fe Depot and Park. Board members and guests from Brackettville, McCamey, Midland, Monahans, Rankin, and State Fair of Texas 3 Sonora attended. Heart of Texas-West 3 The group carpooled from the depot to downtown McCamey to visit Map Release Party the new Veterans Memorial, which features two large curving walls with Preservation Spotlight: 3 the names of local veterans, an eternal flame, and a large open space. Carmelite Monastery Everyone then trekked across the street to a florist/gift shop and drove a Aug Calendar of Events 4 couple of blocks further to see the Girl Scout Hut, a 1940 rock building and Contact Information 4 one of McCamey’s historic landmarks. The group returned to the depot to tour the Mendoza Trail Museum and the 1915 Adrian House. The board of directors and executive director discussed the recent TPTR Board of Directors billboard campaign, upcoming promotions, funding needs, and the Bill Hodges (Chair) participation agreement moving forward with the THC. Ellen Crossland of Sonora Main Street, Sonora McCamey was voted as the new Vice Chair of TPTR. Two small heritage Ellen Crossland (Vice Chair) Mendoza Trail Museum, McCamey tourism grants were awarded to the Friends of the Fort Clark Historic District and the George W.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Odessa Texas
    CityCity ofof OdessOdessaa Texas population 126,753 Director of Human Resources Odessa is looking for a Director of Human Resources whose expertise in human resource management “Platinum Leadership Circle Award” can help the City w/in the 2020 context. Our next Texas Comptroller , 2009 Director of Human Resources will guide the city in succession planning, training, and leadership / “Excellence Award for personnel development of 1,043 employees for one of the fastest-growing city in Texas! Management Innovations” Texas Municipal League , 2006 The Ideal Candidate: Visionary, Team Builder and Influencer Excellent Customer Servant Leader Excellent Collaborator & Recruiter Enthusiastic & Motivating Generationally-savvy, technically-skilled in Human Resources within the context of 2020 Apply before...May 8th WELCOME TO Odessa ,Texas History In 1885 C. W. Rathburn became the first postmaster of the newly established post office. The actual Odessa was founded in 1881 as a stop on the Texas platting of Odessa took place in 1886; 300 acres of the and Pacific Railroads. As the railways extended across original town site are now at the center of the city's the South Plains, there was a need to provide water downtown. Odessa became the county seat when for the steam engines. A local legend associates the Ector County was formally organized in January 1891. town name with a Native American princess who In 1927 Odessa incorporated as a city. wandered into the railroad camp of the Texas and The discovery of oil in 1926 brought an influx of Pacific Railroad but it was more likely named by the people and the local economy transformed from a railroad workers who thought the region’s shortgrass ranching base into an industrial one.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Contradictions to the Book of Genesis
    Scientific Contradictions To The Book Of Genesis www.CreationismOnline.com How Old Are Moon Rocks? According to Genesis 1:14-19 the Moon was made on day 4 of the creation week. According to radiometric dating methods the Moon is: Thorium - Lead Dating = 4.87 to 28.14 Billion Years Old. Uranium-Lead Dating = 5.06 to 10.28 Billion Years Old. Lead - Lead Dating = 5 Billion Years Old. Potassium-Argon Dating = 2.1 to 17 Billion Years Old. Earth And Planetary Science Letters, Volume 14, 1972, Page 281 – 304 The Moon was made on day 4 of the creation week. According to current consensus the Moon is about 5 Thousand Million years old. Science, Volume 167, January 30th, 1970, Page 461-483. Earth And Planetary Science Letters, Volume 14, 1972, Page 169-175, 281 - 304. Clyde Webster states that the Solar System is 4,500 million years old: “Is it possible that the beginning for the consolidation of our Solar System within the universe could have been 4,500 million years ago? Does that impact on scripture? If I understand scripture properly, I have to come back and say NO.”. Record, “A Scientist Talks About Creation”, March 11, 1995, Page 6-9. In an earlier book he states that the Solar System is only 6,000 years old: “These objections can be overcome if we interpret the fourth day of the creation week as addressing only our Solar System and not the entire Universe.” The Earth: Origins And Early History, Dr. Clyde Webster, North American Division Press, 1981, Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geological Record of Meteorite Impacts
    THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD OF METEORITE IMPACTS Gordon R. Osinski Canadian Space Agency, 6767 Route de l'Aeroport, St-Hubert, QC J3Y 8Y9 Canada, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT 2. FORMATION OF METEORITE IMPACT STRUCTURES Meteorite impact structures are found on all planetary bodies in the Solar System with a solid The formation of hypervelocity impact craters has surface. On the Moon, Mercury, and much of Mars, been divided, somewhat arbitrarily, into three main impact craters are the dominant landform. On Earth, stages [3] (Fig. 2): (1) contact and compression, (2) 174 impact sites have been recognized, with several excavation, and (3) modification. A further stage of more new craters being discovered each year. The “hydrothermal and chemical alteration” is also terrestrial impact cratering record is critical for our considered as a separate, final stage in the cratering understanding of impacts as it currently provides the process (e.g., [4]), and is also described below. only ground-truth data on which to base interpretations of the cratering record of other planets and moons. In this contribution, I summarize the processes and products of impact cratering and provide and an up-to-date assessment of the geological record of meteorite impacts. 1. INTRODUCTION It is now widely recognized that impact cratering is a ubiquitous geological process that affects all planetary objects with a solid surface (e.g., [1]). One only has to look up on a clear night to see that impact structures are the dominant landform on the Moon. The same can be said of all the rocky and icy bodies in the solar system that have retained portions of their earliest crust.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of the Geological Society of America December Meeting at Austin Andaltjsite in Californian Eocene Sediments Bt Victor T
    ABSTRACTS OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA DECEMBER MEETING AT AUSTIN ANDALTJSITE IN CALIFORNIAN EOCENE SEDIMENTS BT VICTOR T. ALLEN Californian Chico Cretaceous sandstones near Folsom and Pentz and at the type locality on Chico Creek lack pink andalusite. The overlying Eocene lone sandstones and correlated auriferous gravels contain pink andalusite derived from the bedrock series of the Sierra Nevada. If these Cretaceous and Eocene sediments were both derived from the same source, it appears that contact aureoles around Sierran intrusions with a grade of metamorphism sufficiently high to contain andalusite were not exposed by erosion until Eocene time. Under the Great Valley at several local­ ities a similar limitation of andalusite to the Eocene and younger sediments has been found. It is suggested that careful watch be kept by all investigators to check the possibility of using andalusite to separate Cretaceous from Eocene sediments in California. (Geological Society project.) JOINT PATTERNS IN HIGHLY FOLDED AND CRYSTALLINE ROCKS OF THE NORTHERN NEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS AND THEIR RELATION TO APPALACHIAN OROGENY BY ALFRED N . APPLEBY* Pre-Cambrian rocks predominate in the Highlands of northern New Jersey. Asso­ ciated with them are Paleozoic formations, the youngest of which are Devonian. All are highly folded and metamorphosed. The mantle is largely resultant from Pleisto­ cene glaciation. The rocks are well jointed. Most are shear joints caused by com­ pressive stresses. The observations were made in an area of approximately 200 square miles, between Dover and the New York State line and between Hamburg and Pompton Lakes. For purposes of comparison, some Triassic rocks to the east of this area were examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Index-1966.Pdf
    2 administered trine Metal ^nflsB tw^^t^tanMBM^ttma*^ ^H ^mmm)ttmmm\^mMrV\,9^* .jrepernesZ Jan 1, 1966 contents page 1 Summary of areas administered by the National Park Service 1 Areas administered by the National Park Service (alphabetical listing) 26 Authorized areas for which lands have not been acquired 28 National Historic Sites not owned by the Federal Government 29 Authorized areas which the National Park Service will not administer 30 Sites declared eligible for the National Registry of Natural Landmarks 31 Sites declared eligible for the Registry of National Historic Landmarks 44 Areas administered by the National Park Service (by category) SUMMARY OF AREAS ADMINISTERED BY THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE [Note: See page 44 for list of areas by category] LANDS WITHIN EX­ CATEGORY NUMBER FEDERAL LAND TERIOR BOUNDARIES TOTAL LANDS WITHIN (ACRES) NOT FEDERALLY EXTERIOR BOUND­ OWNED (ACRES) ARIES (ACRES) NATIONAL PARKS 32 13,619,099.36 207,068.32 13,826, 167.68 NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARKS 10 33,358.91 6, 259. 74 39,618.65 NATIONAL MONUMENTS 77 8,941,778.02 121,209. 13 9,062,987.15 NATIONAL MILITARY PARKS il 29,367.63 2,570.00 31,937.63 NATIONAL MEMORIAL PARK 1 69,000.34 1,435.66 70,436.00 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELDS 5 2,733.01 1,4%. 35 4,229.36 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARKS 4 7,162. 76 2,105.29 9,268.05 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD SITES 780.04 5.83 785. 87 NATIONAL HISTORIC SITES 23* 3,088. 95 281.56 3,370. 51 NATIONAL MEMORIALS 16 5,319.80 206.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Impact Structures- a Bibliography 1965-68
    Terrestrial Impact Structures- A Bibliography 1965-68 By JACQUELYN H. FREEBERG GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1320 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-650225 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 30 cents paper cover CONTENTS Page Abstract--------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction______________________________________________________ 1 Seria~----------------------------------------------------------- 2 Bibliography______________________________________________________ 3· Distribution and general characteristics of impact structures_________ 3: Impact sites___________________________________________________ 12: Agnak Island Oraters _ _ __ _ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ 1Z Aouelloul Crater___________________________________________ 12 Arn Valley Craters________________________________________ 12 Barringer Crater__________________________________________ 12 Bass Strait_______________________________________________ 13 Boxhole Crater____________________________________________ 14 Brent Crater______________________________________________ 14 Butare Crater_______________________________________ ------ 14 Campo del Cielo Craters----------------------------------- 14 Carswell Lake structure _________________________ . _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ 15 Chassenon
    [Show full text]