Housing Land Requirements and Supply Briefing Note

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Housing Land Requirements and Supply Briefing Note Bolton’s Authority Monitoring Report 2016/17: Volume 2 Housing Land Requirements and Supply Briefing Note For more information contact: Planning Strategy Department of Place Town Hall Bolton BL1 1RU Tel: 01204 333216 Email [email protected] 1 Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 3 2. Five Year Housing Supply 2017-2022 ...................................................................... 5 3. Housing Trajectory ................................................................................................. 10 4. Overall Housing Supply (Allocated or with Planning Permission) ........................... 12 5. Sites under Construction ........................................................................................ 13 6. New Permissions ................................................................................................... 14 7. Housing Completions (Figure 2) ............................................................................. 16 8. Completions by House Type .................................................................................. 17 9. Registered Provider Development ......................................................................... 19 10. Previously Developed Land ................................................................................... 19 11. Housing Distribution ............................................................................................... 20 12. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 20 Appendix 1: Detailed Schedule of Sites Remaining in the Supply ..................................... 22 2 1. Introduction This briefing note sets out the housing land position in Bolton at 1st April 2017. It also provides information on new planning permissions, dwellings completions and allocated development land in the borough. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was published in March 2012 and sets out the need for Local Planning Authorities to boost significantly the supply of housing. In doing so the LPA is required to identify and update annually a supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide five years’ worth of housing against their housing requirements with an additional buffer of 5% (moved forward from later in the plan period) to ensure choice and competition in the market for land. Where there has been a record of persistent under delivery of housing, local planning authorities should increase the buffer to 20% (moved forward from later in the plan period) to provide a realistic prospect of achieving the planned supply and to ensure choice and competition in the market for land. To be considered deliverable, sites should be available now, offer a suitable location for development now, and be achievable with a realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years and in particular that development of the site is viable. Sites with planning permission should be considered deliverable until permission expires, unless there is clear evidence that schemes will not be implemented within five years, for example they will not be viable, there is no longer a demand for the type of units or sites have long term phasing plans. There is also a requirement to identify a supply of specific, developable sites or broad locations for growth, for years 6-10 and, where possible, for years 11-15. The Allocations Development Plan Document identifies further sites to satisfy this longer term supply. The National Planning Policy Framework does also allow an allowance to be made for windfall sites in the five-year supply where there is compelling evidence that such sites have consistently become available in the area and will continue to provide a reliable source of supply. At this time Bolton’s five year supply does not rely on the inclusion of a windfall allowance. However in an urban area like Bolton windfalls have historically played a significant part in the delivery of housing and their contribution will continue to be monitored. Bolton’s Allocations Plan progressed through its public examination in April/May 2014 and was adopted on 3rd December 2014. The housing figures within the 2014/15 report reflected adoption of the plan and also the Inspector’s key conclusions in his report dated September 2014. These were that: The Allocations Plan proposes sufficient housing site allocations to meet the overall requirement set out in the Core Strategy and is consistent with its planned distribution of housing across the Borough. There has not been persistent under delivery of housing. In terms of a five year supply of deliverable sites it is appropriate to apply an additional buffer of 5%. 3 The backlog of undersupply since 2008 should be addressed and in line with the national Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) should be dealt with in the first five years. The Borough contains significant areas of urban land where planning policy is generally positive towards the provision of new housing. There is clearly potential for at least some larger windfall sites to come forward, including in the short term. In addition the Council accepted at the hearings that it was reasonable to anticipate an average of 40 demolitions per year. However since production of the last AMR there has been a continued under-delivery of new housing against the Core Strategy targets. This results in a rise in the 5 year housing land requirement and the need to apply a 20% uplift to that increased requirement. In addition, the draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework, dated October 2016, sets out a new draft housing requirement for the period 2015-2035. This figure is based on considerable work on objectively assessed need, including building on recent national projections, and for Bolton proposes a housing requirement of 16,800 or 840 per annum. This is higher than the Core Strategy requirement of 694 dwellings per annum. The increase in the 5 year housing land requirement, coupled with a relatively static supply of deliverable housing sites, mean that Bolton can no longer demonstrate a 5 year supply of housing land. This is a situation that was confirmed by the appeal decision for housing development at Hill Lane, Blackrod, in April 2016. DCLG has recently issued a consultation document entitled “Planning for the right homes in the right places: consultation proposals”. This is proposing a national standard methodology for calculating housing need, the underlying basis for local plan housing requirements. In summary this uses national DCLG household projections coupled with affordability ratios to derive housing need figures. This year’s report therefore uses the figure supplied by DCLG as another illustrative base measure against which to assess the five-year supply. The next section of the report therefore considers the five year housing supply against requirements of the Core Strategy (which is now dated), the proposed DCLG standardised methodology figure and draft GMSF figures. In addition it uses a 20% buffer in its supply calculations. 4 2. Five Year Housing Supply 2017-2022 In this monitoring year the five year housing supply 2017-22 has been calculated against a range of requirements including the Core Strategy requirement, DCLG draft standard methodology and draft GMSF. Table 1 sets out 5 year dwelling requirements for 2017-2021/22 using these three underlying requirements. The most relevant position is that against the draft GMSF, the other two are for primarily illustrative purposes. In the case of the Core Strategy and Draft GMSF backlog is proposed to be met in line with national policy within the 5 year period (Sedgefield method) rather than over the remaining life of the plan, the calculation also uses the higher 20% buffer and a clearance allowance of 40 dwellings per annum. Taken together these factors inevitably increase the underlying 5 year requirement above that in previous reports as completions remain well below target levels. This results in a range of revised gross 5 year requirements between 5028 - 6568 dwellings. Table 2 shows the projected deliverable supply for 2017-2022 of 3390 dwellings. In line with advice in NPPF this includes the majority of large sites with permission and an allowance for small sites drawn from those with planning permission. Several Bolton town centre apartment led schemes have been excluded since viability concerns at the present time would suggest doubts over delivery in the short term. A contribution from Horwich Locoworks has been included within the five year supply and this site has will deliver a significant quantity of housing over the plan period. This largely explains the capacity differences between Table 2 and Table 4. The supply of 3390 dwellings is set against the residual requirements under the three scenarios and all result in under-supply ranging from 1638 to 3178 dwellings. These equate to between 52 and 67% of the necessary supply of ready to develop housing. This is the equivalent of 2.6 – 3.4 years, well short of the required 5 years. Against GMSF requirements there is only a 2.8 year supply. Table 1 - 5 Year Requirements Core Strategy Annual 694 Proposed DCLG standard 798 Draft GMSF 840 requirement 2008-2026 methodology 2016-2026 2015-2035 Years since 2008 9 Years since 2 2015 Plan requirement 2008- 6246 GMSF 1680 16/17 requirement since 2015 Net completions 2008- 4443 Net 951 16/17 completions
Recommended publications
  • Bus Franchising Scheme and Notice
    Public Document BUS FRANCHISING SCHEME & NOTICE – 30 March 2021 This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 1 TRANSPORT ACT 2000 The Greater Manchester Franchising Scheme for Buses 2021 Made 30/03/2021 ARRANGEMENT OF THE SCHEME 1. CITATION AND COMMENCEMENT…………………………………………………………………………………1 2. INTERPRETATION………………………………………………………………………………………………….……...1 3. THE FRANCHISING SCHEME AREA AND SUB-AREAS………………………………………………….…..2 4. ENTRY INTO LOCAL SERVICE CONTRACTS……………………………………………………………………..2 5. SERVICES UNDER LOCAL SERVICE CONTRACTS………………………………………………….………….3 6. EXCEPTIONS FROM THE SCHEME……………………………………………………………………….………..3 7. SCHEME FACILITIES………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..3 8. PLAN FOR CONSULTING ON OPERATION OF THE SCHEME……………………………………………4 ANNEXES TO THE SCHEME………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 ANNEX 1: SERVICES INCLUDED – ARTICLE 5…………………………………………………………………….………..5 ANNEX 2: SERVICES INCLUDED – ARTICLE 5.2.3………………………………………………………………………..11 ANNEX 3: EXCEPTED SERVICES – ARTICLE 6………………………………………………………………………………14 ANNEX 4: TEMPORARY EXCEPTIONS – ANNEX 3 PARAGRAPHS 1.2 AND 1.3……………………………..15 ANNEX 5: FRANCHISING SCHEME SUB-AREAS…………………………………………………………………………..18 Page 1 WHEREAS: A The Transport Act 2000 (as amended) ("2000 Act") makes provision for a franchising authority to make a franchising scheme covering the whole or any part of its area. The GMCA is a franchising authority as defined in the 2000 Act. B The GMCA gave notice of its intention to prepare an assessment of a proposed scheme in accordance with sections 123B and section 123C(4) of the 2000 Act on 30 June 2017. Having complied with the process as set out in the Act, the GMCA may determine to make the scheme in accordance with sections 123G and 123H of the 2000 Act. NOW, therefore, the Mayor on behalf of the GMCA, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 123G and 123H of the 2000 Act, and of all other enabling powers, hereby MAKES THE FOLLOWING FRANCHISING SCHEME (the "Scheme"): 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 968 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    968 bus time schedule & line map 968 Canon Slade H.s. - Bolton Via Moss Bank Way View In Website Mode The 968 bus line Canon Slade H.s. - Bolton Via Moss Bank Way has one route. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Bolton: 3:55 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 968 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 968 bus arriving. Direction: Bolton 968 bus Time Schedule 35 stops Bolton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:55 PM Canon Slade High School, Bradshaw Tuesday 3:55 PM Canon Slade School, Castle Hill Tonge Moor Road, Bolton Wednesday 3:55 PM Hall I'Th'Wood Station, Hall I Th Wood Thursday 3:55 PM Friday 3:55 PM Green Way, Hall I Th Wood Saturday Not Operational Eagley Brook Bridge, Hall I Th Wood Seymour Road, Astley Bridge Sunnymead Avenue, Astley Bridge 968 bus Info Direction: Bolton The Pineapple, Astley Bridge Stops: 35 Trip Duration: 35 min Sharples Park, Astley Bridge Line Summary: Canon Slade High School, Bradshaw, Canon Slade School, Castle Hill, Hall I'Th'Wood Station, Hall I Th Wood, Green Way, Hall I Th Wood, Cricket Club, Oldhams Estate Eagley Brook Bridge, Hall I Th Wood, Seymour Road, Astley Bridge, Sunnymead Avenue, Astley Bridge, The Temple Road, Halliwell Pineapple, Astley Bridge, Sharples Park, Astley Temple Road, England Bridge, Cricket Club, Oldhams Estate, Temple Road, Halliwell, Halliwell Road, Smithills, Forest Road, Halliwell Road, Smithills Barrow Bridge, Captains Clough Road, Doffcocker, Primary School, Johnson Fold Estate, Chorley Old Forest Road,
    [Show full text]
  • How to Register
    HOW TO REGISTER DISABLED ACCESS KEARSLEY The practice premises provides marked disabled MEDICAL CENTRE parking, wheelchair access, a disabled toilet, and The practice runs an open list to patients all patient facilities are available on the ground Jackson Street, Kearsley level. residing within the practice boundary. Bolton BL4 8EP Our boundary covers postcodes:- Telephone : 01204 462200 VIOLENT/ABUSIVE PATIENTS Fax: 01204 462744 The practice has a zero tolerance policy. Any BL4 (Kearsley, Farnworth) www.kearsleymedicalcentre.nhs.uk patient demonstrating threatening abusive/violent M26 (Stoneclough, Prestolee, Ringley, behaviour will be removed from the practice list. DOCTORS Outwood) COMPLAINTS/SUGGESTIONS The practice runs an in-house complaints M27 (Clifton up to M62 junction 16 slip road). procedure which is available if you are unhappy Dr George Herbert Ogden with any aspect of our service. Please contact MBChB MRCGP DRCOG DFFP surgery for details. I To register with the practice you will need Dr Liaqat Ali Natha If you have a suggestion, to improve our service the following: MBChB please ask the receptionist for a form. 1 New Patient Registration Pack, Dr Sumit Guhathakurta OUT OF HOURS EMERGENCIES completed together with 2 forms of ID MBChB MRCGP If you require urgent medical advice please ring 2 Appointment with practice nurse. 111 for assistance. If you require urgent medical Dr Charlotte Moran assistance when the surgery is closed, please Patients may specify the GP they wish to be telephone the surgery for further information. MBChB nMRCGP 999 should be dialled for medical emergencies registered with at registration, although the only Dr Rebecca Cruickshank choice of GP cannot be absolute, it depends on MBChB MRCGP availability, appropriateness and reasonable- USEFUL TELEPHONE NUMBERS Dr Molly Douglas ness.
    [Show full text]
  • Wayfarer Rail Diagram 2020 (TPL Spring 2020)
    Darwen Littleborough Chorley Bury Parbold Entwistle Rochdale Railway Smithy Adlington Radcliffe Kingsway Station Bridge Newbold Milnrow Newhey Appley Bridge Bromley Cross Business Park Whitefield Rochdale Blackrod Town Centre Gathurst Hall i' th' Wood Rochdale Shaw and Besses o' th' Barn Crompton Horwich Parkway Bolton Castleton Oldham Orrell Prestwich Westwood Central Moses Gate Mills Hill Derker Pemberton Heaton Park Lostock Freehold Oldham Oldham Farnworth Bowker Vale King Street Mumps Wigan North Wigan South Western Wallgate Kearsley Crumpsall Chadderton Moston Clifton Abraham Moss Hollinwood Ince Westhoughton Queens Road Hindley Failsworth MonsallCentral Manchester Park Newton Heath Salford Crescent Salford Central Victoria and Moston Ashton-underStalybridgeMossley Greenfield -Lyne Clayton Hall Exchange Victoria Square Velopark Bryn Swinton Daisy HillHag FoldAthertonWalkdenMoorside Shudehill Etihad Campus Deansgate- Market St Holt Town Edge Lane Droylsden Eccles Castlefield AudenshawAshtonAshton Moss West Piccadilly New Islington Cemetery Road Patricroft Gardens Ashton-under-Lyne Piccadilly St Peter’s Guide Weaste Square ArdwickAshburys GortonFairfield Bridge FloweryNewton FieldGodley for HydeHattersleyBroadbottomDinting Hadfield Eccles Langworthy Cornbrook Deansgate Manchester Manchester Newton-le- Ladywell Broadway Pomona Oxford Road Belle Vue Willows HarbourAnchorage City Salford QuaysExchange Quay Piccadilly Hyde North MediaCityUK Ryder Denton Glossop Brow Earlestown Trafford Hyde Central intu Wharfside Bar Reddish Trafford North
    [Show full text]
  • Classified Road List
    CLASSIFIED HIGHWAYS Ainsworth Lane Bolton B6208 Albert Road Farnworth A575 Arthur Lane Turton B6196 Arthur Street Bolton B6207 Bank Street Bolton A676 Beaumont Road Bolton A58 Belmont Road Bolton A675 Blackburn Road Turton and Bolton A666 Blackhorse Street Blackrod B5408 Blackrod by-Pass Blackrod A6 Blair Lane Bolton Class 3 Bolton Road Farnworth A575 Bolton Road Kearsley A666 Bolton Road Turton A676 Bolton Road Farnworth A575 Bolton Road Kearsley A666 Bolton Road Westhoughton B5235 Bow Street Bolton B6205 Bradford Road Farnworth Class 3 Bradford Street Bolton A579 Bradshaw Brow Turton A676 Bradshaw Road Turton A676 Bradshawgate Bolton A575 Bridge Street Bolton B6205 Bridgeman Place Bolton A579 Buckley Lane Farnworth A5082 Bury New Road Bolton A673 Bury Road Bolton A58 Cannon Street Bolton B6201 Castle Street Bolton B6209 Chapeltown Road Turton B6319 Chorley New Road Horwich and Bolton A673 Chorley Old Road Horwich and Bolton B6226 Chorley Road Blackrod A6 Chorley Road Westhougton A6 Chorley Road Blackrod B5408 Church Lane Westhoughton Church Street Little Lever A6053 Church Street Westhoughton B5236 Church Street Blackrod B5408 Church Street Horwich B6226 College Way Bolton B6202 Colliers Row Road Bolton Class 3 Cricketer’s Way Westhoughton A58 Crompton Way Bolton A58 Crown Lane Horwich B5238 Dark Lane Blackrod Class 3 Darwen Road Turton B6472 Deane Road Bolton A676 Deansgate Bolton A676 Derby Street Bolton A579 Dicconson Lane Westhoughton B5239 Dove Bank Road Little Lever B6209 Eagley Way Bolton Class 3 Egerton Street Farnworth A575
    [Show full text]
  • Communicating with the Neighbourhoods
    Communicating with the Neighbourhoods June 2018 This work was commissioned from Healthwatch Bolton by Bolton CCG as part of the Bolton Engagement Alliance Communicating with the Neighbourhoods - June 2018 1 Communicating with the Neighbourhoods - Abstract This report is based on conversations or responses freely given by members of the public. Where possible quotations are used to illustrate individual or collectively important experiences. Engagement officers collect responses verbatim and we also present these in our final report as an appendix. This is important in showing the accuracy of our analysis, and so that further work can be done by anyone wishing to do so. A full explanation of the guiding principles and framework for how we do engagement and analysis can be found online on our website www.healthwatchbolton.co.uk. HWB - Communicating with the Neighbourhoods - June 2018 2 Communicating with the Neighbourhoods - Disclaimer Please note that this report relates to findings observed and contributed by members of the public in relation to the specific project as set out in the methodology section of the report. Our report is not a representative portrayal of the experiences of all service users and staff, only an analysis of what was contributed by members of the public, service users, patients and staff within the project context as described. HWB - Communicating with the Neighbourhoods - June 2018 3 Communicating with the Neighbourhoods - Background This piece of work builds on Neighbourhood Engagement Workshops carried out in September and October 2017 by the Bolton Engagement Alliance. The reports of these workshops make a number of suggestions as to how individuals in the Neighbourhoods could be kept informed about developments in health and social care.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolton Neighbourhood Engagement Report 2017
    Bolton Neighbourhood Engagement Report 2017 Bolton Locality Plan and Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Devolution Contents Executive Summary .............................................3 Introduction .................................................12 Methodology ...........................................13 Individual Neighbourhood reports ............16 Central and Great Lever ..................16 Farnworth and Kearsley ...................24 Horwich and Blackrod .....................34 Chorley Roads ..............................47 Westhoughton ..............................55 Breightmet and Little Lever ..............62 Turton .......................................69 Crompton and Halliwell ..................75 Rumworth ..................................82 Executive Summary This report provides the main findings of Neighbourhood workshops aimed at bringing Bolton residents together to explore Bolton’s Locality plan and share ideas, experiences and opinions under the following key themes: What assets do communities have to manage their own health and wellbeing? What makes it difficult for residents to manage their own health and wellbeing? How do residents view the new roles in primary care? How can residents participate in service development? What are the next steps towards achieving outcomes that works for all? residents Key Statistics 262 Total number of people who took part in the workshops Participants in each Neighbourhood Although Blackrod and Horwich belong to the same GP cluster two separate workshops were conducted in this area 18% 17% 16% 47 44 41 11% 10 9% 7 30 7% % 4% 23 % 26 1% 19 19 10 3 Blackrod Breighmet/Little Lever Central/Great Lever Chorley Roads Crompton/Halliwell Rumsworth Farnworth/Kearsley Horwich Turton Westhoughton 92% said the workshops “I will use this information to explain to other met their expectations people I work with in my voluntary capacity and also people I live with in the area. Local people will not be aware of the term devolution itself and it needs to be explained in non-jargon terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester
    Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester Sub-Regional Assessment Appendix B – Supporting Information “Living Document” June 2008 Association of Greater Manchester Authorities SFRA – Sub-Regional Assessment Revision Schedule Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for Greater Manchester June 2008 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 August 2007 DRAFT Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 02 December DRAFT FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales 2007 Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Peter Morgan Alan Houghton Planner Head of Planning North West 03 June 2008 FINAL Michael Timmins Jon Robinson David Dales Principal Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Anita Longworth Alan Houghton Principal Planner Head of Planning North West Scott Wilson St James's Buildings, Oxford Street, Manchester, This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's M1 6EF, appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson United Kingdom accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, Tel: +44 (0)161 236 8655 or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-0411 Response by Greater Manchester Police
    GREATER MANCHESTER POLICE Ian Hopkins QPM, MBA Chief Constable Ms Joanne Kearsley HM Senior Coroner HM Coroner's Court The Phoenix Centre, L/Cpl Stephen Shaw MC Way Heywood OL191LR 28 February 2019 Dear Ms Kearsley Re: Regulation 28 Report following the Inquest touching upon the death of Gregory Rewkowski Thank you for your report sent by email dated 3 January 2019 in respect of Gregory Rewkowski (deceased) and pursuant to Regulations 28 and 29 of The Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 and paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. Having carefully considered your report and the matters therein, I reply to the concerns raised as follows: Extract from Regulation 28, point 1: There is a lack of acknowledgement of the role of the police when dealing with people who are taken on a Section 136 from their own home. The Court did not explore the numbers of Section 136 patients who are taken to a place of safety from their home address. The Court heard how Mr Rewkowski had been taken from his own home on the 1th September. Other agencies are clearly familiar with this process and how GMP facilitate this. However this was also used as an explanation as to why GMP may have been restricted in what they could do on the 2th and 2Efh October i.e. " ... there is nothing we can do if we attend at his own home. We have no powers." There appears to be a significant difference between the legal position and the practical reality of how police deal with such matters if they are called to a home address.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Manchester Green Belt: Additional Assessment of Sites Outside of the Green Belt
    Greater Manchester Green Belt: Additional Assessment of Sites Outside of the Green Belt Study Background In 2016, LUC was commissioned on behalf of the ten Greater Manchester Authorities by Manchester City Council to undertake an assessment of the Green Belt within Greater Manchester. The study provided an objective, evidence-based and independent assessment of how Manchester’s Green Belt contributes to the five purposes of Green Belt, as set out in paragraph 80 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (see Box 1 below). The original assessment also examined the performance of 58 potential additional areas of land that currently lie outside the Green Belt. Box 1: The purposes of Green Belt 1. To check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas. 2. To prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another. 3. To assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment. 4. To preserve the setting and special character of historic towns. 5. To assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land. In 2018, LUC were commissioned to undertake an assessment of 32 additional areas of land that do not lie within the Manchester Green Belt, to assess how they perform against the NPPF Green Belt purposes. The additional areas were identified by the authorities of Bolton, Bury, Oldham, Rochdale, Salford, Stockport and Wigan. The assessment was undertaken using the same assessment methodology used for the 2016 study which is detailed in Chapter 3 of the Greater Manchester Green Belt Assessment (July 2016). This methodology is not repeated here but as per the original study it involved both a desked based assessment and field visits to all of the areas of land.
    [Show full text]
  • See Over I T D O S O H D S a T E G G O E E
    Bolton.qxp_Bolton417000 08/07/2019 11:53 Page 1 417000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 6 5 4 2 1 9 3 O 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 O E 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Charter's Moss Plantation 3 R N F A I E L S L T D W O Edgworth A N H E S S Turton K Y B A Whittles W A Heights W A N Wayoh W H K Reservoir O R D O A A D E M G R H EE A N R S B A O R U M R S LA R . Top o' th' Meadow O A Plantation D B U R Y R STONES BANK ROAD O A D S 416000 416000 Hawkshaw Wood B D L EGERTON ROA A C K B Hall Shore U R N Cheetham Turton R Close LO O H Bottoms NG A I W D G OR H TH S RO T AD R T E E E E T R T S Chapeltown R Delph Dimple E L Reservoir A V K E R N A P A E T L L C P I W A IM R D C T H S O R X S K I E G D R D W A I E B S D E H U H R N Bra Y U d R sha R R E O w Y R I B A ro R U L D D O A S ok B C A N L D S E .
    [Show full text]
  • Bolton Schools 2020-2021
    School Bus Services in Bolton September 2020 to July 2021 Journeys in this leaflet operate on schooldays only, unless otherwise stated. Although provided primarily for school students, members of the public may use these services with the exception of Yellow School Buses. Services are listed alphabetically under school names. An introduction to School buses and concessionary fares for students in Greater Manchester Passengers can pay a fare to the driver for each journey shown on this timetable. However, students will need to show an IGO pass to travel at the concessionary (reduced) fare. If students do not have an IGO pass, they will have to pay a higher fare. Most of the journeys shown in this timetable are funded by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM). The majority of TfGM funded services charge a standard fare and also offer daily return tickets. In some cases, the return ticket can also be used for travel on other journeys which serve similar areas – even if it is provided by a different operator. On most services, students can also buy a weekly scholar’s ticket, which costs £7.60 These are ONLY valid on schooldays on school buses and are available from the bus driver on all services where they are applicable. To help the driver, please try to have the correct fare when buying your ticket. Carnet ticket (10 single trips) £10 – available to buy on the bus or at a TfGM Travel shop. A summary of fares and ticketing information on all school services included in this timetable can be found at https://www.tfgm.com/tickets-and-passes/bus-school-bus-services There are also a small number of TfGM funded services where the operator sets the fares.
    [Show full text]