DOCSLIB.ORG

Venture Capitalists Listed by State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Venture Capitalists Listed by State Venture Capitalists Listed by State Provided by the University of Rochester Center for Entrepreneurship For more resources please visit http://www.rochester.edu/entrepreneurship/resources.html Alabama Advantage Capital Partners Greer Capital Advisors, LLC Harbert Management Corporation New Capital Partners Tullis-Dickerson & Co., Inc. Alaska Arizona Hercules Finance LLC Mayo Medical Ventures Research Corporation Technologies Solstice Capital Arkansas Arkansas Capital Corporation California Aberdare Ventures ABS Capital Partners Acacia Venture Partners Accel Partners Adams Capital Management, Inc. Advanced Technology Ventures Advent International Corporation Agilent Ventures Allegis Capital Alloy Ventures Alta Partners Altos Ventures AltoTech Ventures American River Ventures Ampersand Ventures Apax Partners, Inc. Asset Management Company August Capital BA Venture Partners Battery Ventures Bay Partners BCM Technologies, Inc. Benchmark Capital Bessemer Venture Partners Blue Chip Venture Company Burrill & Company CampVentures Canaan Partners Cardinal Partners Cardinal Venture Capital Cargill Ventures Catamount Ventures CB Health Ventures, L.L.C. Charles River Ventures Clearstone Venture Partners CMEA Ventures Compass Venture Partners L.P. ComVentures Crescendo Ventures Crosslink Capital Crosspoint Venture Partners CTTV Investments LLC Cutlass Capital CW Group, Inc Cypress Ventures De Novo Ventures DEFTA PARTNERS Delphi Ventures Doll Capital Management Domain Associates, L.L.C. Draper Richards, L.P. Earlybird East Gate Capital Management, LLC El Dorado Ventures Entrepia Ventures, Inc. FINAVENTURES Flagship Ventures Flynn Ventures L.L.C. Flywheel Ventures Focus Ventures Forward Ventures Foundation Capital FTVENTURES Gabriel Venture Partners Garage Technology Ventures Globespan Capital Partners Granite Ventures, L.L.C. Greylock GRP Partners Guidant Corporation Hamilton Apex Ventures, LP Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc Housatonic Partners Hummer Winblad Venture Partners IDG Ventures IGNITE Group Intel Capital InterWest Partners INVESCO Private Capital VP - Institutional Venture Partners JAFCO Ventures Kaiser Permanente Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers Kline Hawkes & Co. Latterell Venture Partners Legacy Venture Levensohn Venture Partners Lighthouse Capital Partners Lightspeed Venture Partners Matrix Partners Mayfield Menlo Ventures Mission Ventures Mobius Venture Capital Mohr, Davidow Ventures Montagu Newhall Associates, Inc Montreux Equity Partners Morgan Stanley Venture Partners Morgenthaler Motorola Ventures MPM Capital Needham Capital Partners New Enterprise Associates New Millennium Partners Newton Technology Partners NGEN Partners L.L.C NIF Ventures USA, Inc. Nokia Venture Partners, L.P. Norwest Venture Partners Nth Power Oak Investment Partners Odyssey Venture Partners Omron Advanced Systems, Inc. ONSET Ventures Opportunity Capital Partners Oxford Bioscience Partners Peninsula Equity Partners Pitango Venture Capital POSCO BioVentures Prospect Venture Partners Ridgewood Capital Rustic Canyon Ventures Saints Ventures Sanderling Ventures Schroder Ventures Life Sciences Selby Venture Partners Sevin Rosen Funds Shepherd Ventures Sienna Ventures Sierra Ventures Sigma Partners Sofinnova Ventures, Inc. Softbank Asia Infrastructure Fund Split Rock Partners Sprout Group Steamboat Ventures, L.L.C. Storm Ventures Summit Partners Sutter Hill Ventures TA Associates, Inc. TAT Capital Partners Ltd. Techfarm Ventures Technology Crossover Ventures Technology Partners Telos Venture Partners Texas Instruments The Angels' Forum The Grosvenor Funds Thoma Cressey Equity Partners Thomas, McNerney & Partners L.L.C. TL Ventures Trident Capital Trinity Ventures U.S. Venture Partners Unilever Technology Ventures UV Partners Vanguard Ventures VantagePoint Venture Partners Vector Capital Venrock Associates Ventana Capital Management, L.L.C. Venture Strategy Partners, L.P. Versant Ventures Vision Capital Walden International WaldenVC Warburg Pincus WestBridge Capital Partners WestBridge Ventures L.L.C. Western Technology Investment Weston Presidio Zone Ventures Colorado Advantage Capital Partners Altira Group LLC Appian Ventures BV-Cornerstone Ventures Centennial Ventures Cherry Tree Investments, Inc. Enterprise Partners Gefinor Ventures Management Inc. INVESCO Private Capital iSherpa Capital L.L.C. Mobius Venture Capital Sequel Venture Partners TeleSoft Partners Venture Capital Fund of America/VCFA Group Village Ventures Inc. Vista Ventures Advantage, LP Connecticut Alerion Partners Axiom Venture Partners, L.P. Blue Chip Venture Company Canaan Partners Collinson Howe & Lennox L.L.C. Connecticut Innovations, Inc. Conning Capital Partners Digital Power Capital, LLC Endeavor Capital Management FLAG Capital Management,LLC Foundation Medical Partners Oak Investment Partners Oxford Bioscience Partners Research Corporation Technologies Saugatuck Capital Company SI Ventures The Grosvenor Funds Trident Capital Tullis-Dickerson & Co., Inc. Delaware Inflection Point Ventures Key Principal Partners Washington D.C. Core Capital Partners Digital Power Capital, LLC NextPoint Partners, L.P. Nokia Venture Partners, L.P. Telecommunications Development Fund The Grosvenor Funds Florida Advantage Capital Partners Antares Capital Corporation Baird Venture Partners CrossBow Ventures Inflexion Partners Lee Munder Venture Partners Mayo Medical Ventures SI Ventures Georgia Accuitive Medical Ventures LLC Cordova Ventures EGL Holdings Kinetic Ventures, L.L.C. Research Corporation Technologies UPS Strategic Enterprise Fund Hawaii HMS Hawaii Management Idaho Illinois ABN AMRO Private Equity Adams Street Partners LLC Alpha Capital Partners Ltd. American Capital Strategies Ltd. Arbor Private Investment Co. LLC Arch Development Partners L.L.C. Arch Venture Partners Baird Capital Partners Baird Venture Partners Batterson Venture Partners Beecken Petty O'Keefe Co./2 William Blair Capital Partners William Blair New World Ventures Cambridge Capital Partners LLC Capital For Business Cardinal Growth L.P. CID Equity Partners CIVC Partners Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC DNJ Capital Partners LLC Duchossois TECnology Partners Essex Woodlands Health Ventures First Analysis Frontenac Co. Gaebler Ventures LLC Glencoe Capital LLC Goense Bounds & Partners GTCR Golder Rauner LLC High Street Capital Illinois Finance Authority/3 Inroads Capital Partners JK&B Capital KB Partners Kentco Capital Corp. Keystone Capital Inc. Lake Capital Lake Pacific Partners LLC Leo Capital Holding LLC Madison Dearborn Partners LLC Mesirow Financial Mid Oaks Investments LLC Midwest Mezzanine Funds Motorola Ventures New World Ventures North American Funds OCA Venture Partners L.P. Paradigm Group II LLC Pfingsten Partners LLC Polestar Capital Partners L.P. Portage Venture Partners Prairie Capital III L.P. Prism Capital Prospect Partners LLC Ravenswood Capital Venture Fund Roundtable Healthcare Partners SB Partners Signature Capital, L.L.C. Sterling Partners Svoboda Collins LLC Technology Crossover Ventures Thoma Cressey Equity Partners Transcap Associates Inc. Tricor Pacific Capital Trident Capital Vector Fund Management Waud Capital Partners William Blair Capital Partners Willis Stein & Partners Wind Point Partners Wynnchurch Capital Ltd. Indiana Blue Chip Venture Company Gazelle TechVentures Guidant Corporation Irwin Ventures SBIC, LLC Lilly BioVentures Twilight Venture Partners, LLC Village Ventures Inc. Iowa AAVIN Equity Partners, L.P. Kansas KTEC Kentucky Chrysalis Ventures Louisiana Advantage Capital Partners Maine CEI Community Ventures CEI Ventures, Inc./Coastal Ventures, L.P. Maryland Abell Venture Fund ABS Capital Partners Anthem Capital, L.P. Gabriel Venture Partners Highland Capital Partners Inflection Point Ventures Key Principal Partners Kinetic Ventures, L.L.C. MMG Ventures, L.P. Montagu Newhall Associates, Inc New Enterprise Associates Novak Biddle Venture Partners Sterling Venture Partners Massachusetts ABS Capital Partners ABS Ventures Adams Capital Management, Inc. Adams, Harkness Techventures Advanced Technology Ventures Advent International Corporation Alta Communications Ampersand Ventures Ascent Venture Partners Atlas Venture Battery Ventures Bessemer Venture Partners BioVentures Investors Boston Capital Ventures Boston Millennia Partners CambridgeLight Partners Castile Ventures CB Health Ventures, L.L.C. Charles River Ventures Commons Capital L.P. Commonwealth Capital Ventures Community Technology Fund Cutlass Capital Fidelity Ventures FLAG Capital Management,LLC Flagship Ventures Fletcher Spaght Ventures Globespan Capital Partners GrandBanks Capital Great Hill Partners,LLC Greylock Grove Street Advisors HarbourVest Partners, LLC HealthCare Ventures, L.L.C. Highland Capital Partners HLM Ventures Housatonic Partners IDG Ventures Inflection Point Ventures Ironside Ventures JAFCO Ventures Key Principal Partners Kodiak Venture Partners Lancet Capital Lee Munder Venture Partners Massachusetts Technology Development Corporation Mediphase Venture Partners, L.P. Motorola Ventures MPM Capital Needham Capital Partners NextPoint Partners, L.P. North Bridge Venture Partners North Hill Ventures, L.P. Oxford Bioscience Partners POD Holding Polaris Venture Partners Prism Venture Partners PureTech Ventures Rock Maple Ventures Schroder Ventures Life Sciences Seaflower Ventures Sigma Partners Solstice Capital Summit Partners TA Associates, Inc. TD Capital Ventures Techno Venture Management The Venture Capital Fund of New England Thoma Cressey Equity Partners Thomas, McNerney & Partners L.L.C. Venrock Associates
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HW&Co. Landscape Industry Reader Template
    TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA, & TELECOM QUARTERLY SOFTWARE SECTOR REVIEW │ 3Q 2016 www.harriswilliams.com Investment banking services are provided by Harris Williams LLC, a registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA and SIPC, and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Harris Williams & Co. is a trade name under which Harris Williams LLC and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd conduct business. TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA, & TELECOM QUARTERLY SOFTWARE SECTOR REVIEW │ 3Q 2016 HARRIS WILLIAMS & CO. OVERVIEW HARRIS WILLIAMS & CO. (HW&CO.) GLOBAL ADVISORY PLATFORM CONTENTS . DEAL SPOTLIGHT . M&A TRANSACTIONS – 2Q 2016 KEY FACTS . SOFTWARE M&A ACTIVITY . 25 year history with over 120 . SOFTWARE SECTOR OVERVIEWS closed transactions in the . SOFTWARE PRIVATE PLACEMENTS last 24 months OVERVIEW . SOFTWARE PUBLIC COMPARABLES . Approximately 250 OVERVIEW professionals across seven . TECHNOLOGY IPO OVERVIEW offices in the U.S. and . DEBT MARKET OVERVIEW Europe . APPENDIX: PUBLIC COMPARABLES DETAIL . Strategic relationships in India and China HW&Co. Office TMT CONTACTS Network Office UNITED STATES . 10 industry groups Jeff Bistrong Managing Director HW&CO. TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA & TELECOM (TMT) GROUP FOCUS AREAS [email protected] Sam Hendler SOFTWARE / SAAS INTERNET & DIGITAL MEDIA Managing Director [email protected] . Enterprise Software . IT and Tech-enabled . AdTech and Marketing . Digital Media and Content Services Solutions Mike Wilkins . Data and Analytics . eCommerce Managing Director . Infrastructure and . Data Center and . Consumer Internet . Mobile [email protected] Managed Services Security Software EUROPE Thierry Monjauze TMT VERTICAL FOCUS AREAS Managing Director [email protected] . Education . Fintech . Manufacturing . Public Sector and Non-Profit . Energy, Power, and . Healthcare IT . Professional Services . Supply Chain, Transportation, TO SUBSCRIBE PLEASE EMAIL: Infrastructure and Logistics *[email protected] SELECT RECENT HW&CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Technology & Services Market
    Market Update Education Key Highlights The top subsector stock performer in Q4 2019 Technology was digital educational content & services, up 13.7% year-over-year & Services On average, EBITDA multiples for the subsectors decreased 0.5x from the prior quarter and were Q4 2019 down 0.8x on a year-over-year basis 2020 Forecast…Sustained Robust Deal Activity Focused on High Quality Assets and Strong Outcomes-Driven Business Models For several years now, we have been predicting continued consolidation within the education technology and services market. Merger and acquisition activity of all types within the sector has been robust, with overall transaction volumes repeatedly surpassing year-over-year levels by healthy margins. Even with ongoing strategic consolidation in the space, ever-increasing private equity interest in the education sector has been the primary driver of continued strong transaction levels and increasing valuations. A record amount of available capital, or “dry powder,” and elevated interest in software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) business models were the primary underlying factors driving private equity interest levels in ed tech businesses. Interest in high quality education providers has also been robust, underpinned by strong outcome-driven theses behind businesses built to solve the “achievement gap” and/or “skills gap” problem with a keen focus on value proposition to the consumer. In the early childhood segment, activity levels remain high, driven by continued professionalization and consolidation within an otherwise highly fragmented global market. And in the proprietary postsecondary sector, after a “decade of pain,” M&A has made a comeback with several new investments by private equity investors seeking premium operators in markets with strong supply/ demand imbalances.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbourvest—China: the Intersection of Innovation and E-Commerce
    PRIVATE MARKETS INSIGHTS CHINA: THE INTERSECTION OF INNOVATION AND E-COMMERCE Q&A WITH HARBOURVEST PARTNERS’ BEIJING-BASED In the following interview, Beijing-based Managing Director Sally MANAGING DIRECTOR SALLY SHAN Shan discusses the ongoing evolution of China’s digital economy, and explores some of the more promising areas for investment. One of our core, long-term investment themes focuses on the wave of technology-driven innovation sweeping the globe. Day after day, new products and services emerge that disrupt China has evolved into a global hub for innovation traditional business models, and fundamentally change the and e-commerce in a very short period of time. What have been the key drivers? way people communicate with each other and consume and To understand where we are at today, it’s helpful to trace the pay for goods and services. Nowhere are these dynamics more path of China’s digital economy and how it has matured to at play than in China, where the internet and rising demand the point where it now plays a key role in private equity for mobile technology are creating fertile ground for private strategies. There have been two 10-year periods that have investment opportunities. brought us to this point. The first came between 1998 and 2008, when we had the arrival of personal computers As always, the key to private investing success in China is and the birth of the internet. Unlike in the US – where partnering with local experts who have access to the most people embraced PCs, bought them, and put them in their proven managers.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding for Social Enterprises in Detroit
    Funding for Social Enterprises in Detroit: ASSESSING THE LANDSCAPE PREPARED BY MARCH 2019 FUNDING FOR SOCIAL ENTERPRISES IN DETROIT: ASSESSING THE LANDSCAPE Preface Disclaimer Avivar Capital, LLC is a Registered Investment Adviser. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Avivar Capital, LLC and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. This website is solely for informational purposes. Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. Investing involves risk and possible loss of principal capital. No advice may be rendered by Avivar Capital, LLC unless a client service agreement is in place. The commentary in this presentation reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints and analyses of the Avivar Capital, LLC and employees providing such comments. It should not be regarded as a description of advisory services provided by Avivar Capital, LLC or performance returns of any Avivar Capital, LLC investments client. The views reflected in the commentary are subject to change at any time without notice. Nothing on this presentation constitutes investment advice, performance data or any recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Any mention of a particular security and related performance data is not a recommendation to buy or sell that security. Financing Vibrant Communities 2 FUNDING FOR SOCIAL ENTERPRISES IN DETROIT: ASSESSING THE LANDSCAPE The concept of integrating social aims with profit-making has been an emerging trend in the world for quite some time now, changing the way philanthropies think about impact and the way businesses operate. In fact, increasingly organizations “are no longer assessed based only on traditional metri- cs such as financial performance, or even the quality of their products or services.
    [Show full text]
  • Philadelphia Investment Trends Report
    Venture impact Technology investment in the Greater Philadelphia region Trends and highlights, January 2008 to June 2013 Innovation, investment and opportunity On behalf of EY, Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania and the Greater Philadelphia Alliance for Capital and Technologies (PACT), we are pleased to present this review 421 companies of technology investment trends and highlights in the Greater Philadelphia region. $4.1 billion The technology investment community in the Greater Philadelphia region includes a wide variety of funding sources supporting a diverse array of companies and industry sectors. In this report, Total investment since we’ve analyzed more than a thousand investment rounds and January 2008 exits that occurred in the Philadelphia region since 2008 – including investments from venture capital fi rms (VCs), angel investors (Angels), corporate/strategic investors, seed funds, accelerators and other sources of funding. As shown in this report, 2012 reversed a post-recession slowdown in venture funding in Greater Philadelphia, and to date, 2013 has brought a welcome increase in the amount of new funds available at regional investment fi rms. These are positive signs for our region’s technology companies, as are the increasing number of exits via IPO and acquisition, which serve as further validation of the investment opportunities created by our region’s growing technology sector. We encourage you to explore this report, and we hope that it will provide useful insights into the current state of
    [Show full text]
  • Reporting Tool
    REPORT 2018ESG ANNUAL REVIEW OF HARBOURVEST’S ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE ACTIVITIES CONTENTS 3 14 MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE SUPPORTING EMERGING AND MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE DIVERSE-LED MANAGERS IMPACT INVESTING, FEMALE-LED VC FUNDS 4 We’re driven by the APPROACH AND GOVERNANCE 20 belief that strong PROGRAM OVERVIEW, GLOBAL ESG COMMITTEE CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY financial returns and DIVERSITY, COMMUNITY, TALENT DEVELOPMENT, positive social change 6 OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS COMMITTED TO RESPONSIBLE INVESTING can be accomplished ESG INVESTMENT PROCESS, PRI ASSESSMENT, 24 in tandem. GP ESG RANKINGS OUTREACH AND EVENTS HARBOURVEST 2018 ESG REPORT / 1 MESSAGE FROM THE “ESG factors are becoming EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE more prominent in the We are pleased to present HARBOURVEST PARTNERS’ Perhaps our most gratifying highlight came in the form of an external investment decision-making 2018 ESG REPORT, our annual review of the initiatives validation of the progress we have made. Our ESG efforts are assessed process and will only grow in and activities we undertook in 2018 to support our independently each year by the PRI, and our most recent results across importance in the years ahead.” longstanding commitment to being conscientious three core categories—Strategy and Governance (A+), Indirect Investments investors and engaged corporate citizens. (A+), and Direct Investments (A)—were our best ever and placed us in the As a leading private markets manager and investor, as well as a proud top quartile of private equity managers (see p. 7). signatory to the Principles for Responsible Investment (“PRI”), we have a dual None of these achievements would be possible without our incredibly responsibility to continuously strengthen our own ESG capabilities, and to dedicated people.
    [Show full text]
  • European Technology, Media & Telecommunications Monitor
    European Technology, Media & Telecommunications Monitor Market and Industry Update Fourth Quarter 2012 Piper Jaffray European TMT Team: Eric Sanschagrin Managing Director Head of European TMT [email protected] +44 (0) 207 796 8420 Stefan Zinzen Principal [email protected] +44 (0) 207 796 8418 Jessica Harneyford Associate [email protected] +44 (0) 207 796 8416 Peter Shin Analyst [email protected] +44 (0) 207 796 8444 Julie Wright Executive Assistant [email protected] +44 (0) 207 796 8427 TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA &TELECOMMUNICATIONS MONITOR Market and Industry Update Selected Piper Jaffray 2012 TMT Transactions 2 This report may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed to any other person or published in whole or in part for any purpose without the written consent of Piper Jaffray. © 2013 Piper Jaffray Ltd. All rights reserved. TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA &TELECOMMUNICATIONS MONITOR Market and Industry Update Contents 1. Internet and Digital Media A. Trading Update B. Transaction Update C. Public Market Trading Multiples 2. Software and IT Services A. Trading Update B. Transaction Update C. Public Market Trading Multiples 3. Communications Technology And Hardware A. Trading Update B. Transaction Update C. Public Market Trading Multiples 4. Equity Capital Markets and M&A Update 3 This report may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed to any other person or published in whole or in part for any purpose without the written consent of Piper Jaffray. © 2013 Piper Jaffray Ltd. All rights reserved. TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA &TELECOMMUNICATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History of William H. Draper III
    Oral History of William H. Draper III Interviewed by: John Hollar Recorded: April 14, 2011 Mountain View, California CHM Reference number: X6084.2011 © 2011 Computer History Museum Oral History of William H. Draper III Hollar: So Bill, here I think is the challenge. There's been a great oral history done of you at Berkeley; and then you've written your book. So there's a lot of great information about you on the record. So what I thought we would try to— Draper: That's scary. I hope I say it the same way. Hollar: Well, your version of it is on the record, that's for sure. So I wanted to cover about eight areas in the hour and a half that we have. Draper: Okay. Hollar: Which is quite a bit. But I guess that's also a way of saying—we can go into as much or as little detail as you want to. But the eight areas that I was most interested in covering are your early life and your education; your early career—and with that I mean Inland Steel and meeting Pitch Johnson, and Draper, Gaither & Anderson, that section. Draper: Good. Hollar: Then Draper & Johnson—you and Pitch really getting into it together; then, of course, Sutter Hill and that very incredible fifteen-year period. Draper: Yeah, that was a good period. Hollar: A little bit of what you call "the lost decade." Draper: Okay. Hollar: Then what I call the Draper Richards Renaissance. Draper: Good. Hollar: And kind of the second chapter of venture capital for you.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Placement Activity Chris Hastings | [email protected] | 917-621-3750 3/5/2018 – 3/9/2018 (Transactions in Excess of $20 Million)
    Private Capital Group Private Placement Activity Chris Hastings | [email protected] | 917-621-3750 3/5/2018 – 3/9/2018 (Transactions in excess of $20 million) Trends & Commentary ▪ This week, 14 U.S. private placement deals between $20 million and $50 million closed, accounting for U.S. VC Average Deal Size by Series $516 million in total proceeds, compared to last week’s 10 U.S. deals leading to $357 million in total $ in Millions proceeds. This week also had 5 U.S. deals between $50 million and $100 million yielding $320 million, $35 compared to last week’s 4 deals resulting in $279 million in total proceeds. ▪ The U.S. VC average deal size has been significantly increasing for early and late stage VC deals. Late $30 stage VC has increased by 8.8% CAGR 2008 – 2017 while early stage VC has grown by 7.4% CAGR 2008 – 2017. (see figure) ▪ Southern Cross, a PE fund that invests in energy, pharmaceuticals and technology in Latin America, has $25 decided against restructuring its third fund after receiving some interest from its LPs. It is largely because its third fund has been a weak performer, the discount on fund stakes would have been steep and that the $20 fund wanted more time to exit. ▪ Univision has filed to withdraw its pending IPO due to “prevailing market conditions”. Univision initially filed $15 plans to IPO in 2015. ▪ New State Capital Partners has closed its second institutional fund on its $255 million hard cap. The fund $10 can invest more than $50 million equity per deal in sectors such as business services, healthcare services and industrials.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard County Retirement Plans Meeting Materials
    MEETING MATERIALS HOWARD COUNTY RETIREMENT PLANS April 29, 2021 Margaret Belmondo, CIMA®, Partner Will Forde, CFA, CAIA, Principal Francesca LoVerde, Senior Consulting Analyst BOSTON | ATLANTA | CHARLOTTE | CHICAGO | DETROIT | LAS VEGAS | PORTLAND | SAN FRANCISCO TABLE OF CONTENTS Page March Flash Report 3 Correlation & Stochastic Analysis 12 High Yield Search Book 19 2 MARCH FLASH REPORT NEPC, LLC 3 CALENDAR YEAR INDEX PERFORMANCE 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Mar YTD S&P 500 2.1% 16.0% 32.4% 13.7% 1.4% 12.0% 21.8% -4.4% 31.5% 18.4% 4.4% 6.2% Russell 1000 1.5% 16.4% 33.1% 13.2% 0.9% 12.1% 21.7% -4.8% 31.4% 21.0% 3.8% 5.9% Russell 2000 -4.2% 16.3% 38.8% 4.9% -4.4% 21.3% 14.6% -11.0% 25.5% 20.0% 1.0% 12.7% Russell 2500 -2.5% 17.9% 36.8% 7.1% -2.9% 17.6% 16.8% -10.0% 27.8% 20.0% 1.6% 10.9% MSCI EAFE -12.1% 17.3% 22.8% -4.9% -0.8% 1.0% 25.0% -13.8% 22.0% 7.8% 2.3% 3.5% MSCI EM -18.4% 18.2% -2.6% -2.2% -14.9% 11.2% 37.3% -14.6% 18.4% 18.3% -1.5% 2.3% MSCI ACWI -7.3% 16.1% 22.8% 4.2% -2.4% 7.9% 24.0% -9.4% 26.6% 16.3% 2.7% 4.6% Private Equity 9.5% 12.6% 22.3% 14.6% 10.4% 10.3% 21.0% 13.1% 17.2% 13.0%* - - BC TIPS 13.6% 7.0% -8.6% 3.6% -1.4% 4.7% 3.0% -1.3% 8.4% 11.0% -0.2% -1.5% BC Municipal 10.7% 6.8% -2.6% 9.1% 3.3% 0.2% 5.4% 1.3% 7.5% 5.2% 0.6% -0.4% BC Muni High Yield 9.2% 18.1% -5.5% 13.8% 1.8% 3.0% 9.7% 4.8% 10.7% 4.9% 1.1% 2.1% BC US Corporate HY 5.0% 15.8% 7.4% 2.5% -4.5% 17.1% 7.5% -2.1% 14.3% 7.1% 0.1% 0.8% BC US Agg Bond 7.8% 4.2% -2.0% 6.0% 0.5% 2.6% 3.5% 0.0% 8.7% 7.5% -1.2% -3.4% BC Global Agg 5.6% 4.3% -2.6%
    [Show full text]
  • In Eastern Partner Countries
    EU4Digital: supporting digital economy and society in the Eastern Partnership Market Assessment for Digital Innovation and Scale-up Initiative in Eastern partner countries Final report June 2020 1 About this study In early 2020, EU4Digital Facility launched activity ‘Market Assessment for Digital Innovation and Scale-up Initiative (DISC) in Eastern Partner Countries’ (hereinafter – study / research) The goal is to analyse the investment landscape for digital high tech companies in these countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine. The activity was inspired by Digital Innovation and Scale-up initiative (DISC) in Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe region (European Commission Factsheet). Based on the findings of this study, the European Commission will be able to adjust its plans to better serve the needs of the local markets, developing adapted financial support instruments. This research aims to: 1. Understand digital innovation and high-tech start-ups investment landscape and identify existing gaps on investment in Eastern partner countries. 2. Map the main private & corporate equity investors that provide financing to digital start-ups and fast growth companies in Eastern partner countries. 3. Map the main public sector investment programs in start-up / tech-oriented companies at the country-level. 4. Analyse micro-level data on private investments in start-up / tech-oriented companies in the region. 5. Provide recommendations to develop and use financial instruments for digital innovation and the scale-up of high-tech start-ups. The research focuses on start-ups at the creation and scale-up phases, rather than traditional SMEs on their path to digitalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Cleveland's Health Care Industry and Bioenterprise Initiative
    Overview of Cleveland’s Health Care Industry and BioEnterprise Initiative November 14, 2007 1 Overview • Regional Health Care Base: 2002 • Transformation: Role of State • BioEnterprise and Entrepreneurship • Lessons Learned 2 Cleveland Health Care Base Nationally-recognized leaders in clinical care and research … • > $450 Million in annual research • Numerous nationally-distinctive programs including: • Cardiovascular • Cancer • Neurology • Orthopedics • Surgery • Pediatrics • Medical imaging • Biomedical engineering • Stem cells & tissue engineering • Advanced materials • Molecular diagnostics • Anti-infectives • Prions • Destination for innovation and care 3 Cleveland Health Care Base … a broad industry base… • ~500 health care Biopharma- companies in region ceutical 16% • Five >$1 billion companies Device/ or divisions Equipment Other 68% • Over 20,000 employees 6% Health Care Services/IT 10% 4 Weak Commercialization …However, few companies were attracting growth equity CLEVELAND AREA CLEVELAND AREA HEALTH CARE VENTURE INVESTMENT HEALTH CARE VENTURE INVESTMENT $ Millions Companies Financed 6 33 5 8 2 01 02 0 0 0 001 2 2 2 20 5 Source: Dow Jones Venture Wire; Venture Source; BioEnterprise Broad Effort Required • Community- People wide effort Pipeline • Collaboration Growth Clinical • Connectedness … regionally Capital and nationally 6 2002: Commitment to Growth • Private • Renewed focus on entrepreneurs and innovation • Technology transfer culture capabilities significantly enhanced • Investment firms and professional services • Public
    [Show full text]