2676 HCO 2000/1-2 06 Kronieken
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE CATHOLIC-MALANKARA ORTHODOX DIALOGUE 145 zich tevens in voor de bevordering van THE CATHOLIC- godsdienstvrijheid in Griekenland. De orthodoxe Kerk van Griekenland MALANKARA ORTHODOX blijft zich op de voor haar sacrosancte DIALOGUE twee-eenheid van Griekendom en ortho- dox christendom baseren. De kerklei- The tenth round of talks between the ding blijft zich als de morele garant van theologians of the Catholic Church and de Griekse natie opstellen. Tevens geniet the Malankara Orthodox Church was zij grote financiële en sociale voorrech- held at the Spirituality Centre, Kot- ten die zij niet van plan is op te geven. tayam, Kerala from 26th to 30th Octo- Voor de moderne tijd staat zij veel te ber, 1998. It is a high time to make an weinig open en de gelijkwaardige behan- evaluation of the activity of the Joint deling van andere kerken en godsdien- International Theological Commission sten in Hellas houdt zij tegen. Deze constituted in 1988 by His Holiness houding komt haar niet alleen op felle Basileos Mar Thoma I, the Catholicos kritiek te staan (ook vanuit het buiten- of the Malankara Orthodox Church. land), maar levert ook veel stof op voor Griekse kranten, televisieprogramma’s The first round of talks was in 1989 en cabaretuitvoeringen, met name links (22-26 October) at the Sophia Centre in het politieke spectrum. of the Orthodox Church at Kottayam. Fr. E.R. Hambye († 1990) wrote a Bert Groen report about this meeting in the Chris- (Nijmegen) tian Orient.1 Among other things Fr. Hambye speaks of a dinner on the 26th at the Archbishop’s house, Changanacherry. ‘The chief guest was Matthews Mar Coorilos, Metropolitan of Quilon and the Catholicos Elect. The host, Mar Joseph Powathil, the Orthodox co-chairman of the meeting, Paulos Mar Gregorios and the chief guest spoke with such great ecumenical perception and fervour that one could almost believe that the communion between both the churches was just around the corner … Moreover, when the cake was brought on the table, the chief guest asked his neighbour, Fr. P. Duprey, to cut it together with him. Then, to the applause of all the guests, 1 Christian Orient, 10 (1989), 4, pp. 163-164. 146 KRONIEKEN and with a spontaneity that signified Persistent prejudices so much at the moment, Mar Coorilos In order that the theological dialogue (dia- put a piece of cake into the mouth of logue of truth) may be effective, dialogue the Vatican delegate. It was as if the of love (charity) must precede; it means marriage between both the churches that there must be the necessary prepara- was almost settled. Let us firmly hope tions before we start serious theological and sincerely pray that it may be so dialogue.4 Dialogue should be based on without too long an awaiting.’2 But so the following ecumenical principles: far after ten years, the ‘marriage between 1. Consider the dialoguing churches as both the churches’ is not yet settled. equal partners. 2. Avoid outdated and The hope of the author and others still meaningless discussions on unimportant remains as an objective, and the prayer issues. 3. Do not try to convert the part- for unity continues daily. ners; do not brood over the past, but look to the future mission and unity, try The Christological agreement to understand the Christian mysteries During the first meeting itself the Com- together. 4. Concentrate on those things mission prepared a joint statement on which promote the unity of the churches Christology. This common text con- and thus do service to the ecumenical.5 cerning the faith in the mystery of the Incarnate Word was submitted to the Prejudice still prevails in certain circles authorities of both churches and, after in Kerala. For example, some among their approval, was made public on June the Latin section of the Catholic Church 3, 1990.3 Many consider that it was still consider that the ancient St. Thomas the best Christological interchurch for- Christians were ‘Nestorian heretics and mulation recently agreed upon by schismatics’. They were brought to obe- churches. dience by the Goan Archbishop Dom Menezes at the Synod of Diamper in From the second up to the tenth meeting 1599. During the recent tenth meeting, After the first meeting, there was a joint one of their representatives vehemently meeting every year, preceded by sub- defended the western missionaries of committee meetings. But so far the Joint the sixteenth century and outrightly Commission could not produce any denounced the St. Thomas Christians as document of substantial quality which Nestorian heretics.6 The Latin Catholics could be presented to the churches for approval. There were three subcommit- 2 Ibid., p. 164. 3 tees: on church history, on theology and Christian Orient, 11 (1990), 4, pp. on common witness. The church his- 197-198. 4 Ecumenical Directory, 1993, nos 172- tory committee looked into the history 182. of Christianity in Kerala. The subcom- 5 Compare The Vienna Dialogue, booklet mittee on theology dealt with various no. 6 (1995), pp. 88-102. theological issues; and the third one 6 J. Ochranthuruth, The Synod of Diam- looked into ways and means of com- per and its Impacts on Kerala Church (Cali- mon witness. cut, 1998). THE CATHOLIC-MALANKARA ORTHODOX DIALOGUE 147 in Kerala are going to celebrate the not only in statements but also in prac- 400th anniversary of the Synod of tice. The oriental Catholic churches Diamper next year (1999) in a very must be examples for the Orthodox solemn way. This is a blow to ecu- churches. One should feel confident that menical understanding among the in the Catholic communion, no church churches in Kerala. His Holiness John will be sidelined, ignored or excluded Paul II has prohibited the usage ‘Nesto- or restricted as a church. They should rian’.7 One should not blame all the not be presented as churches living at the western missionaries and the whole of mercy of bigger churches. The Ortho- western Christianity on the basis of mis- dox look into the affairs of the oriental takes committed by some missionaries Catholic churches in India and it is not of the sixteenth century. Today the impe- a good example or model for them. rialist powers have gone. We live in a They know very well how the two ori- free world and to continue to denounce ental Catholic churches are territorially the present leadership for the mistakes restricted and systematically impeded of the sixteenth century is unwarranted for giving proper pastoral care to their and improper. own faithful outside Kerala. As long as the rights of the oriental Catholic An example and a fear churches are denied, no ecumenical dis- Even in the Catholic communion, one cussion will progress seriously in India. notices some indiscipline in Kerala at Ten years have taught us this basic les- present. Even though supreme author- son. ity is in the Catholic Church, the litur- gical problems in the Syro-Malabar The full truth Church risk causing great scandal to Ecumenical dialogues aim at the whole many and might harm the cause of and full truth. No agreement for the Christ. Secondly, in the Catholic com- sake of momentary understanding will munion, the two ancient oriental native ensure lasting peace and communion. apostolic Catholic churches in India are This holds good in regard to history restricted to a very tiny corner of India and theology. Biblical kerygma cannot and are in practice denied the basic be diluted and historical truths cannot rights of a church, namely, the pastoral care of their faithful and evangelization. 7 ‘All the Christian churches must hum- Thirdly, although there is more talk on bly acknowledge their grave responsibil- collegiality, there is still fear regarding the ity for the marginalization and the suffe- way certain big churches act towards rings endured by the Assyrian Church smaller churches. As long as there is no throughout the centuries: the pejorative firm assurance that the rights of the ori- epithet ‘Nestorian’ (often synonym of her- etical) with which they have referred to ental churches will be respected, no this church until recent times, is no lon- strong move for convergence will be ger acceptable and must be definitely made manifest. The numerically insignif- abandoned.’ (Service d’information: Con- icant oriental churches, however, deserve seil Pontifical pour la Promotion de l’Unité to be accepted and treated as churches, des Chrétiens, N. 91 (1996), 1-2, p. 26.) 148 KRONIEKEN be compromised. A re-examination of asked pardon for the mistakes on the history has the purpose sole of recon- part of the Catholic Church. ciliation. That means, it is to purify the memory. Times have changed, circum- The history stances too, the persons involved are no After the arrival of St. Thomas in India more. We have today a new life situa- in 52 A.D., the Church of the St. tion, a new mission and we confront Thomas Christians lived as one church new problems. We live at the dawn of and one society. It used the East Syrian a new millennium. Our time is fast (Mesopotamian) Liturgy. The leader of changing, fast moving and fast pro- the church was the archdeacon. It was gressing. We have no time to brood over the one holy Catholic and apostolic past mistakes, spend our energy on them church of Christ. At the time of the and remain sorrowfully buried among Portugese arrival the bishops present them. We have to forgive and look for- here were from Mesopotamia. The last ward and march forward, having our one, Mar Abraham, died in 1597. The sacred goal in front of us.