Project № CB005.1.23.017 „Virtual Maritza

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project № CB005.1.23.017 „Virtual Maritza EUROPEAN UNION The project is co-funded by EU through the Interreg-IPA CBC Bulgaria–Turkey Programme 2014 - 2020 Project № CB005.1.23.017 „Virtual Maritza - Merich Cuisine“, Subsidy contract: РД- 02-29-61/20.03.2017, funded by EU through the Interreg-IPA CBC Bulgaria–Turkey Programme 2014 - 2020. This document has been produced with the assistance of the European Union through the Interreg-IPA CBC Bulgaria-Turkey Programme 2014 - 2020, CCI No 2014TC16I5CB005. The content of this document are the sole responsibility of RMA „Maritza“ and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union or the Managing Authority of the Programme. EUROPEAN UNION The project is co-funded by EU through the Interreg-IPA CBC Bulgaria–Turkey Programme 2014 - 2020 CONTENT INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 5 I.SURVEY DESIGN ............................................................................................................................... 6 1. Survey topic ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Purpose and tasks of the survey........................................................................................................... 6 3. Scope of the survey ............................................................................................................................. 6 4. Theoretical model of the survey .......................................................................................................... 7 4.1. Concept ............................................................................................................................................. 7 4.2. Terms ................................................................................................................................................ 7 5. Research toolbox. Methodology for data registration. ........................................................................ 8 5.1. Study of documents .......................................................................................................................... 8 5.2. Studying opinions ............................................................................................................................. 8 5.2.1. Inquiry ........................................................................................................................................... 8 6. Sampling methodology ........................................................................................................................ 9 7. Organization plan of the survey. ......................................................................................................... 9 II. TRADITIONAL REGIONAL CULINARY CULTURE AND TRADITIONAL CUISINE IN THE HASKOVO REGION ........................................................................................................................... 11 1. Specifics of Bulgarian national cuisine ............................................................................................. 11 2. Haskovo region – regional profile ..................................................................................................... 12 2.1. Cultural and historical heritage ...................................................................................................... 13 2.2. Traditional regional culinary culture and traditional cuisine. ......................................................... 15 2.3. Analysis of the information obtained through the inquiries and collected data from document sources. .................................................................................................................................................. 18 2.3.1. Summary of the survey results .................................................................................................... 18 2.3.2. Analysis of information obtained through online inquiries ......................................................... 20 2.3.2.1. Analysis of the information received through online inquiries from representatives of the community centers in Haskovo region .................................................................................................. 20 2.3.2.2. Analysis of the information collected through the online inquiry for physical persons ........... 26 2.3.3. Analysis of information collected by interviewer ....................................................................... 27 2.3.4. Study of documents ..................................................................................................................... 30 III. TRADITIONAL RECIPES OF HASKOVO REGION .................................................................. 32 1. Traditional recipes of Dimitrovgrad Municipality ............................................................................ 32 1.1. Shepherd’s gyuvetch, Gorski izvor village .................................................................................... 32 This document has been produced with the assistance of the European Union through the Interreg-IPA CBC Bulgaria-Turkey Programme 2014 - 2020, CCI No 2014TC16I5CB005. The content of this document are the sole responsibility of RMA „Maritza“ and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union or the Managing Authority of the Programme. EUROPEAN UNION The project is co-funded by EU through the Interreg-IPA CBC Bulgaria–Turkey Programme 2014 - 2020 1.2. Rabbit kapama – Raynovo village and Dobrich village ................................................................. 33 1.3. Osmyanka ....................................................................................................................................... 34 1.4. Bumbar ........................................................................................................................................... 34 1.5. Mashed beans with meat pieces, Dobrich village........................................................................... 34 1.6. Fish-tavaluk, с. Kasnakovo village ................................................................................................ 35 1.7. Tatlii, Gorski izvor village ............................................................................................................. 36 1.8. Thracian maslenitsa ........................................................................................................................ 36 1.9. Thracian baklava – Saraliya, Bryast village ................................................................................... 37 1.10. Puska from Yabalkovo ................................................................................................................. 37 2. Traditional recipes of Haskovo Municipality .................................................................................... 39 2.1. Katino meze, Klokotnitsa village ................................................................................................... 39 2.2. Soup of onions with cheese ............................................................................................................ 39 2.3. Soup of fresh garlic ........................................................................................................................ 40 2.4. Dock soup ....................................................................................................................................... 40 2.5. Dish with flat sausage and leek from Haskovo .............................................................................. 40 2.6. Keshkek, Voyvodovo village ......................................................................................................... 40 2.7. Tarkalatsi ........................................................................................................................................ 41 2.8. Tutmanik ........................................................................................................................................ 41 2.9. Smigdal ........................................................................................................................................... 42 3. Traditional recipes of Harmanli Municipality ................................................................................... 43 3.1. Bulgur soup .................................................................................................................................... 43 3.2. Green beans .................................................................................................................................... 43 3.3. Ripe beans with chickpeas.............................................................................................................. 44 3.4. Pork kebap, Polyanovo village ....................................................................................................... 44 3.5. Kebap in a clay pitcher ................................................................................................................... 44 3.6. Knuckle of pork in a pot ................................................................................................................. 45 3.7. Sesame buiscuits ............................................................................................................................. 45 4. Traditional recipes of Lyubimets Municipality ................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Commission Implementing Decision (Eu) 2017
    9.3.2017 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 63/177 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2017/417 of 7 March 2017 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of the highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (notified under document C(2017) 1614) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra- Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 (3) was adopted following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5 in holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, France, Croatia, Italy, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Sweden and the United Kingdom (‘the concerned Member States’) and the establishment of protection and surveillance zones by the competent authority of the concerned Member States in accordance with Council Directive 2005/94/EC (4). (2) Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 provides that the protection and surveillance zones established by the concerned Member States in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones in the Annex to that Implementing Decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in Each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds” Prepared at the Request of the CONT Committee
    STUDY Requested by CONT Committee The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds PRE-RELEASE Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs Authors: Willem Pieter DE GROEN, Jorge NUNEZ, Daina BELICKA, Roberto EN MUSMECI, Damir GOJSIC and Silvia TADI Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 679.107– January 2021 The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds PRE-RELEASE Abstract This report provides the preliminary findings of the study on “The Largest 50 beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds” prepared at the request of the CONT committee. It provides the results of an assessment of almost 300 systems for the public disclosure of the beneficiaries of the common agricultural policy (CAP) and cohesion policy. Moreover, it provides the preliminary results for the analysis of about 10 million beneficiaries of the CAP in 2018 and 2019 and more than 500 000 projects receiving cohesion funds between 2014 and 2020. Finally, it assesses the barriers to more data transparency and the possibilities to enhance the transparency. NOTE: This is a pre-release version of the study. Changes may occur based on the final results of the research. For internal use only. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control. It designated Ms Monika Hohlmeier to follow the study. AUTHORS Willem Pieter DE GROEN, CEPS Jorge NUNEZ, CEPS Daina BELICKA, CSE COE Roberto MUSMECI, CEPS Damir GOJSIC, CEPS Silvia TADI, CEPS The authors would like to thank Daniele Genta, Babak Hakimi and Xinyi Li for their valuable contributions to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Decisione Di Esecuzione (Ue)
    23.11.2018 IT Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea L 298/65 DECISIONE DI ESECUZIONE (UE) 2018/1842 DELLA COMMISSIONE del 22 novembre 2018 che modifica l'allegato della decisione di esecuzione (UE) 2017/247 relativa a misure di protezione contro i focolai di influenza aviaria ad alta patogenicità in alcuni Stati membri [notificata con il numero C(2018) 7911] (Testo rilevante ai fini del SEE) LA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA, visto il trattato sul funzionamento dell'Unione europea, vista la direttiva 89/662/CEE del Consiglio, dell'11 dicembre 1989, relativa ai controlli veterinari applicabili negli scambi intracomunitari, nella prospettiva della realizzazione del mercato interno (1), in particolare l'articolo 9, paragrafo 4, vista la direttiva 90/425/CEE del Consiglio, del 26 giugno 1990, relativa ai controlli veterinari applicabili negli scambi intraunionali di taluni animali vivi e prodotti di origine animale, nella prospettiva della realizzazione del mercato interno (2), in particolare l'articolo 10, paragrafo 4, considerando quanto segue: (1) La decisione di esecuzione (UE) 2017/247 della Commissione (3) è stata adottata in seguito alla comparsa di focolai di influenza aviaria ad alta patogenicità del sottotipo H5 in vari Stati membri («gli Stati membri interessati») e all'istituzione di zone di protezione e sorveglianza da parte delle autorità competenti degli Stati membri interessati in conformità all'articolo 16, paragrafo 1, della direttiva 2005/94/CE del Consiglio (4). (2) La decisione di esecuzione (UE) 2017/247 stabilisce che le zone di protezione e sorveglianza istituite dalle autorità competenti degli Stati membri interessati in conformità alla direttiva 2005/94/CE devono comprendere almeno le zone elencate come zone di protezione e sorveglianza nell'allegato di tale decisione di esecuzione.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Program Democracy
    Democracy Network Program DemNet II: Building Civil Society in Bulgaria Final Report Democracy Network Program DemNet II: Building Civil Society in Bulgaria 1998-2002 FINAL REPORT TO THE U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Cooperative Agreement No. 181-A-00-98-00320-00 Institute for Sustainable Communities 535 Stone Cutters Way, Montpelier, VT 05602 USA Phone 802-229-2900 | Fax 802-229-2919 [email protected] | www.iscvt.org April 2003 Photos, front and back inside covers: Bulgarian landscapes; next page: DemNet-supported activities of SO partners and NGOs working for positive change in Bulgaria. Table of Contents I. Executive Summary • 6 II. The Context • 8 III. Program Design & Goals • 9 IV. Strengthening the Capacity of SO Partners • 11 • SELECTING SUPPORT ORGANIZATION PARTNERS • ORGANIZATIONAL STRENGTHENING • DEEPENING PROGRAM IMPACT • KEY OUTCOMES IN DEMNET’S FUNCTIONAL AREAS V. SO Partner Performance Stories • 22 VI. Supporting a Vibrant NGO Sector & Strengthening Civil Society in Bulgaria • 24 • TARGETING UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS & IMPROVING SOCIAL SAFETY NETS • CREATING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY • NETWORKING & COALITION BUILDING FOR SUPPORT & SUSTAINABILITY • STRENGTHENING OUTREACH & PUBLIC RELATIONS • INCREASING CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN POLICY DIALOGUE VII. Lessons Learned • 27 VIII. Conclusion • 29 IX. Attachments A: DEMNET SO PARTNER PUBLICATION B: SO PARTNER SUMMARIES C: ORGANIZATIONAL STRENGTHENING & PERFORMANCE MONITORING COMPONENTS D: SERVICE QUALITY REVIEW REPORT E: DONOR SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY F: ENGAGE INITIATIVE REPORT G: TRAVEL NOTES PUBLICATION (ENGAGE INITIATIVE) H: VOICES FOR CHANGE PUBLICATION I: ADVOCACY INITIATIVE REPORT J: LEADING LIGHTS PUBLICATION K: SUMMARY OF NGO GRANTEES L: SENSE OF EMPOWERMENT VIDEO Acknowledgements The success of any project is in the hands of many people—the SO partners, the capable and dedicated ISC staff in Bulgaria, many excellent consultants who supported the program, and the Bulgaria USAID mission that provided sound support and counsel at critical junctures.
    [Show full text]
  • Сommunity- Led Local Development Strategy, 2014 – 2020
    СOMMUNITY-LED LOCAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY, 2014 – 2020 NGO „Local Action Group STAMBOLOVO – KARDZHALI 54“ February, 2017 CONTENTS AND STRUCTURE OF THE STRATEGY FOR CLLD (MANDATORY ELEMENTS) (font - Times New Roman 12, spacing 1,15) 1. Description of the LAG : (not more than 3 pages) 1.1. Data about the municipalities and the settlements, which are within the LAG territory: -list of the The Municipality of Stambolovo and the Municipality of Kardzhali municipalities, (54 settlements) part of the LAG; o The Municipality of Stambolovo (all 26 settlements): The village of Balkan, the village of Byal Kladenets, the village of Vodentsi, the village of Voyvodenets, the village of Gledka, the village of Golobradovo, the village of Golyam Izvor, the village of Dolno Botevo, the village of Dolno Pole, the village of Dolno Cherkovishte, the village of Zhalti Bryag, the village of Zimovina, the village of Kladenets, the village of Kralevo, the village of Lyaskovets, the village of Madzhari, the village of Malak Izvor, the village of Popovets, the village of Pchelari, the village of Patnikovo, the village of Rabovo, the village of Svetoslav, the village of Silen, the village of Stambolovo, the village -list of the of Tankovo and the village of Tsareva Polyana. settlements, part of the LAG; o The Municipality of Kardzhali (54 out of all 118 settlements): Bashtino, Beli plast, Bolyartsi, Byala polyana, Byalka, Visoka polyana, Gnyazdovo, Gorna krepost, Gaskovo, Dobrinovo, Dolishte, Dolna krepost, Ivantsi, Zhinzifovo, Zvinitsa, Zimzelen, Zvezdelina, Zvezden, Kaloyantsi, Kokiche, Konevo, Krin, Lyulyakovo, Maystorovo, Miladinovo, Most, Murgovo, Madrets, Nevestino, Oreshnitsa, Panchevo, Perperek, Povet, Propast, Rudina, Rani list, Sedlovina, Sestrinsko, Skalishte, Sokolyane, Strahil Voyvoda, Stremovo, Stremtsi, Svatbare, Solishte, Skarbino, Sipey, Tatkovo, Tri mogili, Chereshitsa, Chernyovtsi, Chiflik, Shiroko pole and Yastreb.
    [Show full text]
  • Pagina 1 Di 22 10/10/2014
    Pagina 1 di 22 Print Bluetongue, Bulgaria Close Information received on 01/09/2014 from Pr. Nikola T. Belev, OIE Delegate, OIE Regional Representation for Eastern Europe, Ministry of Agriculture and Food , SOFIA, Bulgaria Summary Report type Follow-up report No. 3 Date of start of the event 04/07/2014 Date of pre-confirmation of the 04/07/2014 event Report date 01/09/2014 Date submitted to OIE 01/09/2014 Reason for notification Reoccurrence of a listed disease Date of previous occurrence 27/03/2008 Manifestation of disease Clinical disease Causal agent Bluetongue virus Serotype 4 Nature of diagnosis Clinical, Laboratory (basic) This event pertains to the whole country Immediate notification (15/07/2014) Follow-up report No. 1 (07/08/2014) Follow-up report No. 2 (08/08/2014) Related reports Follow-up report No. 3 (01/09/2014) Follow-up report No. 4 (08/09/2014) Follow-up report No. 5 (24/09/2014) New outbreaks (156) Outbreak 1 Zlatograd, Zlatograd, Smoljan, SMOLJAN Date of start of the outbreak 14/07/2014 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Cattle 15 4 0 0 0 Outbreak 2 Kushla, Zlatograd, Smoljan, SMOLJAN Date of start of the outbreak 14/07/2014 Outbreak status Continuing (or date resolved not provided) Epidemiological unit Farm Species Susceptible Cases Deaths Destroyed Slaughtered Affected animals Goats 93 2 0 0 0 Outbreak 3 Tsatsarovtsi, Zlatograd, Smoljan, SMOLJAN Date of start of the outbreak 14/07/2014 Outbreak
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Energy 1/73 Fifth
    REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT ON BULGARIA’S PROGRESS IN THE PROMOTION AND USE OF ENERGY FROM RENEWABLE SOURCES Drafted in accordance with Article 22(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources on the basis of the model for Member State progress reports set out in Directive 2009/28/EC December 2019 1/73 REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENERGY TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS USED ..................................................................................................................................4 UNITS OF MEASUREMENT ............................................................................................................................5 1. Shares (sectoral and overall) and actual consumption of energy from renewable sources in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018) (Article 22(1) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ........................................................................6 2. Measures taken in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018) and/or planned at national level to promote the growth of energy from renewable sources, taking into account the indicative trajectory for achieving the national RES targets as outlined in your National Renewable Energy Action Plan. (Article 22(1)(a) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.a Please describe the support schemes and other measures currently in place that are applied to promote energy from renewable sources and report on any developments in the measures used with respect to those set out in your National Renewable Energy Action Plan (Article 22(1)(b) of Directive 2009/28/EC) ..................... 18 2.b Please describe the measures in ensuring the transmission and distribution of electricity produced from renewable energy sources and in improving the regulatory framework for bearing and sharing of costs related to grid connections and grid reinforcements (for accepting greater loads).
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Implementing Decision (Eu)
    23.11.2018 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 298/65 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2018/1842 of 22 November 2018 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (notified under document C(2018) 7911) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra- Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 (3) was adopted following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5 in a number of Member States (‘the concerned Member States’), and the establishment of protection and surveillance zones by the competent authority of the concerned Member States in accordance with Article 16(1) of Council Directive 2005/94/EC (4). (2) Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 provides that the protection and surveillance zones established by the competent authorities of the concerned Member States in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones in the Annex to that Implementing Decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1.4. Identified Sites in Terms Oftheir the Historical Periododi- Zation
    Седалище: 6300 Хасков о, у л. „Цар Осв ободител“ 4 Адрес за кореспонденция: Бизнес Инку батор, 6310 Клокотница, Община Хасков о тел: ++359 38 66 50 21; факс: ++359 38 66 48 69 e-mail: [email protected] o www.maritza.inf o ANNEX 1.4. IDENTIFIED SITES IN TERMS OFTHEIR THE HISTORICAL PERIODODI- ZATION PERIOD PREHISTORIC /2.5 million years ago - 3300/3000 BC./ Dolmen acropolis, Oryahovo village and Vaskovo village, Lyubimets Prehistoric Thracian Fortress "Golyamo Gradishte", Gorno Bryastovo village, Mineral bani Sunny Clock, Mineralni bani village, Mineral bani Dolmen, Studena village, Kapaklia, Svilengrad municipality Prehistoric and proto-historical yam complex, Kapitan Andreevo village, "Hausa" village, Svilengrad ANCIENT /3300/3000 BC until 800BC/ Thracian Dolmen, village of Zhelezino, Ivailovgrad Rock cult complex "Deaf Rocks", Dabovets village and Malko Gradishte village, Lyubimets municipality Thracian domed tomb, village of Valche pole, municipality of Lyubimets Step foot, village of Oryahovo, municipality Lyubimets Thracian Fortress and Sivri Dikme Shrine, Gorno Pole, Madzharovo Municipality The step of the Virgin Mary, village of Mineralni bani Antique and Medieval Settlement, Svilengrad, Hissarya near the Kanacliiski neighbourhood Tombstone Mound, village of Madjari, Stambolovo Rock Tomb, Popovets, Hambar Tash Area, Stambolovo Tombstone mound, Popovets village, Stambolovo Mogilen necropolis, Stambolovo village, "Dvete Chuki", municipality Stambolovo Mogilev necropolis, Stambolovo village, Illyraska gora municipality Stambolovo
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Club--Brucellosis Paper.Pdf
    Surveillance and outbreak reports I NVEST I GAT I ON OF THE SPREAD OF BRUCELLOS I S AMONG HUMAN AND AN I MAL POPULAT I ONS I N SOUTHEASTERN B ULGAR I A , 2 0 0 7 V Tzaneva ()1, S Ivanova2, M Georgieva2, E Tasheva2 1. University Hospital, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria 2. Regional Inspectorate for Public Health Protection and Control, Haskovo, Bulgaria Three human cases of brucellosis were reported in summer 2007 countries, representing a notification rate of 0.20 per 100,000. in the region of Haskovo in southeastern Bulgaria. Subsequently, Twelve countries reported zero cases. The highest notification rates the regional veterinary and public health authorities carried out per 100,000 were reported by Greece (1.1), Italy (0.78), Portugal investigations to determine the spread of infection in domestic (0.72) and Spain (0.3) [5]. animals and in the human population. As a result, over 90,000 animals were tested, and 410 were found infected with brucellosis. In Bulgaria, since 1903, only sporadic cases had been reported The screening of 561 people believed to have been at risk of in humans. However, during the last few years, the numbers infection yielded 47 positive results. The majority of these persons increased; 37 cases were reported in 2005 and 11 in 2006 had direct contact with domestic animals or had consumed [6,7]. In 2007, in the course of the investigations described in unpasteurised dairy products. The investigations revealed evidence this paper, 50 cases were identified in the province of Haskovo in of disease among animals in the region and a considerable risk to southeastern Bulgaria (Figure 1), which brought the total number humans, thus emphasising the need for effective prevention and of cases registered in the country to 57.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2017/247 of 9 February 2017 on Protective Measures in Relation to Outbreaks of Highly Path
    L 36/62 EN Official Journal of the European Union 11.2.2017 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2017/247 of 9 February 2017 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (notified under document C(2017) 1044) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra- Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in birds. Infections with avian influenza viruses in domestic poultry and other captive birds cause two main forms of that disease that are distinguished by their virulence. The low pathogenic form generally only causes mild symptoms, while the highly pathogenic form results in very high mortality rates in most species of birds. That disease may have a severe impact on the profitability of poultry farming. (2) In the event of an outbreak of avian influenza in a Member State, there is a risk that the disease agent may spread to other holdings where poultry or other captive birds are kept. As a result, it may spread from one Member State to other Member States or to third countries through trade in live poultry or other captive birds or their products.
    [Show full text]