Retail Practice Eating out(side): the next normal

Our survey of US consumers suggests that indoor dining in may not return to precrisis levels for months—or possibly even years. That means full-service restaurant operators need a new economic model.

by Stacey Haas, Anne Kronschnabl, John R. Moran, and Pepijn van Kesteren

© Halbergman/Getty Images

August 2020 Months after COVID-19 first wreaked havoc on lives establishments rapidly pivoted to off-premise and livelihoods around the world, much of the US channels—primarily drive-through, delivery, and restaurant industry faces a deeply uncertain near- takeout—and were buoyed by a relatively swift, term future. In particular, many full-service restaurant if uneven, recovery in May and June. Then, as operators have had to adjust and readjust their plans states across the country reopened, street-side multiple times, and are unsure when—or if—they’ll and sidewalk dining blossomed in some cities. be able to reopen fully, given surges in COVID-19 Consumers, tired of at home and eager for cases in several regions. Even where indoor dining some return to normalcy, started eating out again. is permitted, consumers continue to be wary, as our By mid-June, overall restaurant sales had recovered recent survey of US consumers indicates. roughly 25 percentage points.

In such an unpredictable environment, how But the boost in business turned out to be short should restaurant operators plan ahead? What lived. The number of COVID-19 cases climbed in should their priorities be? We recommend two numerous states, and governors reissued shutdown focus areas: investing in the customer experience orders. For several segments of the restaurant and developing a model that acknowledges the industry—particularly full-service dining—the restaurant industry’s new economics. recovery has slowed (Exhibit 1).

In several states, the prospects for a full, A start-and-stop recovery unconditional reopening look dim. The Following the initial US lockdowns, in mid-March, unpredictability of the virus’s spread means that sit-down dining disappeared almost entirely some US restaurants may not have the option of across the country. Overall US restaurant-industry welcoming guests into their dining rooms for some revenues plunged by more than 50 percent through time to come. Local authorities could impose or April. Yet some chains adapted right away: many extend dining restrictions for months. Even in quick-service restaurants (QSRs) and casual-dining places where restaurants are reopening in limited

Web <2020> Exhibit <1> 1 of <5> Trends inin sit-downsit-down diningdining show show thatthat thethe on-premiseson-premises recoveryrecovery has slowed.slowed. Seated dining by key state, % year-over-year change (7-day rolling average)

20 Texas

Florida 0 US average

–20 California

New York –40

–60

–80

–100 Mar Apr May June July Aug

Source: OpenTable Source: OpenTable

2 Eating out(side): Restaurant dining in the next normal forms—for example, at partial capacity—some — close or active interactions with other customers, operators may decide that reopening at all would be either directly or indirectly—for example, unprofitable. Furthermore, even when restaurants standing or sitting near other customers, are permitted to reopen fully, consumers may still touching surfaces or items that other customers not feel safe dining in indoor public spaces. have touched, and using restroom facilities

— close or active interactions with employees—for Anxious consumers example, when servers take orders and when A McKinsey Pulse Survey conducted in June among they bring to the table more than 1,000 US adults who had visited QSRs or casual-dining restaurants within the past year — distant or passive interactions with other indicates that most consumers are anxious about people—for example, when entering and leaving sit-down dining in restaurants. More than 80 percent restaurants and when waiting to be seated of survey respondents reported medium to high anxiety levels about the idea of returning to dine-in The first type—close or active interactions with other restaurants—in fact, more than half said they would customers—is the biggest contributor to consumer be highly anxious. This is in sharp contrast with anxiety (Exhibit 3). consumer sentiment regarding drive-through dining, about which only 16 percent of respondents reported These survey results align with those of a similar high anxiety (Exhibit 2). McKinsey survey focused on consumer anxiety in grocery shopping, which showed that people were The survey asked consumers to rate their level of much more anxious about interacting with other anxiety regarding three types of dine-in interactions: shoppers than with store employees. Respondents

Web <2020> Exhibit <2> 2 of <5> More than 8080 percent of consumers are are anxious anxious aboutabout indoorindoor restaurantrestaurant dining.dining.

Consumer restaurant-dining anxiety,¹ % of respondents

NOT ANXIOUS Casual Quick-service dine in dine in 46

Low anxiety 17 18

Medium anxiety 41 40 38

16 ANXIOUS

High anxiety 42 42 Fast-food drive-through

¹N > 735; Question: “Given what you know today about COVID-19, what is your level of anxiety about dining in the following ways once states reopen?” Source: 2020 Contactless Journey Pulse Survey: Restaurants

Eating out(side): Restaurant dining in the next normal 3 Exhibit 3 The interactionsinteractions that cause thethe mostmost anxiety anxiety involveinvolve touchingtouching shared surfacessurfaces or proximity to to other other customers. customers. Customer anxiety about returning to dine-in restaurants

Distant/passive interaction Close/active interaction Touching things that other people touched/ with others with employees close proximity to other customers

Dining in a quick-service restaurant Dining in a casual restaurant

60 60 G 8 6 F 2 E 7 3 40 40 5 Patrons D Patrons 4 with above- with above- A C 9 average average anxiety B High-anxiety, anxiety 1 High-anxiety, level,¹ % H high-impact level,¹ % high-impact 20 journeys 20 journeys

0 10 20 30 0 10 20 30 Importance for overall Importance for overall dine-in anxiety level,² % dine-in anxiety level,² % l 1 Arriving at the restaurant l A Arriving at the restaurant l 2 Waiting to be seated l B Deciding what to order l 3 Being seated at a table l C Placing an order at the counter l 4 Placing your order l D Paying for your order at the counter l 5 Receiving your order l E Receiving your order l 6 Eating in the restaurant l F Eating in the restaurant l 7 Paying the check l G Using restaurant amenities l 8 Using restaurant amenities l H Leaving the restaurant l 9 Leaving the restaurant

¹Any level of anxiety above “somewhat anxious.” ²Derived importance using Johnson’s Relative Weights analysis. Source: 2020 Contactless Journey Pulse Survey: Restaurants

said that shopping for fresh produce—touching anxiety survey respondents indicated that they don’t fruits and vegetables that many other people may plan to return to dine-in restaurants “until a vaccine have touched—was one of the main drivers of is available and the virus is contained” or “until at anxiety during grocery-store trips. least 2021.”

By implementing new and safety measures, restaurants can likely attract customers who feel Implications for restaurant operators only low or medium levels of anxiety about indoor The takeaway: restaurants can’t count on indoor restaurant dining. Putting high-anxiety customers at dining to return to precrisis sales levels anytime ease, however, will prove more difficult. Some high- soon. In a scenario where the virus resurges in

4 Eating out(side): Restaurant dining in the next normal several US states, even if government interventions 2. developing a new long-term economic model, are partially effective, casual- and fine-dining including partial on-premises dining and an restaurant revenues might not fully recover until expansion of off-premises solutions 2023 or later (Exhibit 4). This scenario—localized virus recurrences and moderately effective policy Invest in the guest experience responses—is one of nine economic-impact Of , restaurants that decide to offer indoor scenarios1 that our colleagues developed in March; dining should adhere to the latest guidelines from it appears to be the one currently playing out across the Centers for Control and Prevention the country. (CDC), as well as all standards and directives from state and local authorities. But it will also be crucial Against this backdrop, what concrete steps can to introduce measures that reduce the anxiety restaurant operators take to protect people’s health of patrons. We surveyed consumers about what and safety while also strengthening the business? In interventions would most reduce their anxiety our view, two areas are of prime importance: about in-restaurant dining. As Exhibit 5 shows, the top anxiety-reducing interventions are increased 1. making the guest experience as safe and positive sanitization, particularly disinfecting dining surfaces as possible—and broadly communicating new between customers; limited occupancy to maintain health and safety measures—so that customers physical distancing; and requiring employees to feel comfortable returning to restaurants

Exhibit 4 The recoveryrecovery forfor casualcasual andand nefine diningdining is is projected projected to to taketake years.years.

Restaurant sales projection, index (0 = 2019)

0 Casual dining

–20 Fine dining

–40

–60

–80

–100 2020 2021

Source: Black Box Intelligence; company nancials; Datassential; expert interviews; Foursquare; industry reports; NPD; US Census Bureau; McKinsey analysis, in partnership with Oxford Economics; McKinsey COVID-19 US Consumer Pulse Survey

1 Kevin Buehler, Arvind Govindarajan, Ezra Greenberg, Martin Hirt, Susan Lund, and Sven Smit, “Safeguarding our lives and livelihoods: The imperative of our time,” March 2020, McKinsey.com.

Eating out(side): Restaurant dining in the next normal 5 Exhibit 5 Rigorous sanitization,sanitization, limited occupancy,occupancy, and personal protective equipmentequipment for employees are are the the most most effective eective anxiety-reducing anxiety-reducing interventions. interventions. Top 10 prompted interventions, % of respondents

Dining in a quick-service restaurant Dining in a casual restaurant

Disinfect all dining surfaces between customer use Disinfect all dining surfaces between customer use 27 31 Limit number of guests in restaurant Make hand sanitizer/wipes available to customers 25 24 Increase space between tables or restrict seating Limit number of guests in restaurant 21 24 Require employees to wear gloves/masks Require employees to wear gloves/masks 19 22 Make hand sanitizer/wipes available to customers Increase space between tables or restrict seating 18 19 Place 6-foot space markings in line/waiting areas Install additional separation between tables 14 14 Install additional separation between tables Require all to be digital, posted, or touchless 13 14 Increase visible (hourly) cleaning cycles Increase visible (hourly) cleaning cycles 12 13 Require temperature checks for employees Require temperature checks for employees 11 13 Require temperature checks for customers Require temperature checks for customers 11 11

Source: 2020 Contactless Journey Pulse Survey: Restaurants

wear personal protective equipment. It’s crucial for — making the delivery business profitable— restaurants not only to implement these measures for instance, by negotiating longer-term but also to communicate them broadly and make agreements with third-party delivery companies, them highly visible to customers. leveraging “ghost” , and developing in-house delivery capabilities in denser markets Develop a new economic model The COVID-19 crisis has changed the restaurant — re-architecting the and pricing to focus industry’s economics, perhaps irreversibly. on the optimal daypart mix and occasions, as Restaurants must therefore come up with a new well as finding the right balance of key value economic model to sustain the business over a items, specials or limited-time offers, and longer period of time than they might have initially high-margin items (such as appetizers, sides, planned for. For most restaurants, the key elements , and beverages) of such a model will include several of the following: — introducing new ways of providing value to — optimizing carryout, curbside, and drive- customers—for example, by offering grocery through operations, using the lens of customer products, take-home items, or shipped product experience—for instance, by reevaluating bundles through online food marketplaces (such staffing, traffic flow, food temperature, and as Goldbelly or Zingerman’s) food packaging

6 Eating out(side): Restaurant dining in the next normal Restaurants must come up with a new economic model to sustain the business over a longer period of time than they might have initially planned for.

— redefining and deepening customer relationships in the expectation of a relatively rapid recovery. through direct digital communication, loyalty The sooner they acknowledge and plan for the programs, and personalization industry’s new longer-term economics, the better their chances of surviving the crisis and thriving in — rethinking restaurant layout, flow, staffing, and the next normal. standard operating procedures to align with the new off-premises models, daypart mix, and customer experience In light of virus resurgence, anxious consumers, and — reviewing real-estate strategy in light of major continuing uncertainty, US restaurant operators have shifts in foot traffic and occupancy costs little choice but to become more agile and resilient than they’ve ever had to be. The brief recovery in May — making longer-term arrangements with and June offers strong evidence that consumers suppliers of foodstuffs, packaging and paper crave the restaurant experience and will return to goods, restaurant equipment, and other supplies eating in restaurant dining rooms as soon as they feel it’s safe to do so. In the meantime, operators will need No doubt, every restaurant operator has grappled to summon all their resourcefulness and creativity to with these issues during the past few months, but in serve customers profitably. many cases they’ve formulated short-term solutions

For brief commentary from the authors, see the videos accompanying this article on McKinsey.com.

Stacey Haas is a partner in McKinsey’s Detroit office; Anne Kronschnabl is an associate partner in the New Jersey office, where Pepijn van Kesteren is a consultant; and John R. Moran is an associate partner in the Boston office.

Designed by McKinsey Global Publishing Copyright © 2020 McKinsey & Company. All rights reserved.

Eating out(side): Restaurant dining in the next normal 7